TREASON! TREASON! THE PREP ACT IS TREASONOUS. Unfortunately, no lawsuits are coming because--what do you know!--all the corporate law firms are tied to the Defense Department

But, yeah, treason is levying war against the United States or adhering to their enemies.  I'm looking at it . . . "giving them aid and comfort within the United States while owing allegiance to the United States."  --Katherine Watt

The PREP Act, which has allowed for the C19 death jabs to be made available to slaughter Americans en masse, IS LITERAL TREASON

Katherine Watt: "Congress...[overthrew] the U.S. Constitution and laws by passing the PREP Act and by not repealing it."

TREASON. TREASON. TREASON.… pic.twitter.com/cUBiMFjYN5

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) April 28, 2025

00:00.  Would you just really clearly outline to my audience how the people who push these COVID measures committed treason and how many did it knowingly?

00:15.  I don't know how many did it knowingly but I tend to think it's a lot more than I used to think since I read that December 21, 2005 Senate record because within 2 days of it being slipped into that Defense Appropriations Bill, they already had a very good legal analysis that said, this is clearly unconstitutional.  This is clearly a violation of the separation of powers between the different branches of the federal government and clearly a violation of the Federalist separation of powers between the federal government and the states, and they voted for it anyway.  So everyone who gave his speech certainly knew that they were committing treason.  Everyone who heard the speech or read the letter that Edwin Chemerinsky wrote also knew that what they were doing was committing treason.  And as for people who have been voting on some of the measures since then, I don't know; it depends how much they understood and how much they were just like, "I'm here in Congress.  I do whatever they tell me to do.  I vote when they tell me to vote, and I vote in the way that they tell me to vote."  But, yeah, treason is levying war against the United States or adhering to their enemies.  I'm looking at it . . . "giving them aid and comfort within the United States while owing allegiance to the United States."  And to whatever extent people can start to examine the actions of the members of Congress and the president and the cabinet secretaries and the judges as far as who do you owe allegiance to if this is what you think is what you should be doing and watching what they do clearly they are not thinking of themselves as owing allegiance to the United States they think they owe allegiance to somebody else and that's why they are making war against the people of the United States.

OATH OF OFFICE IS AWOL FOR HIGH-LEVEL PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICIALS

02:11.  Yes, interestingly, a law firm, a law firm that we've talked to you before, they FOIA'd the records of oath of office for a bunch of high level official. In the Biden Administration, in the first Trump Administration and the Biden Administration, so they FOIA'd like other records of their Properly Executed Oath of Office.  Most of them did not have it.  Like Rochelle Walensky didn't have it.  Javier Becerra didn't have it.  There's a bunch of, you know, of these health and related high level officials did not have those Oaths of Office executed while they were doing this.  And that may be because they knew that they were committing treasonous Acts.

02:55.  There are several laws related to that main treason one, like it is also a crime if you know of treason not to disclose it.  It's also a crime to incite rebellion, which you can construe with the HHS secretaries have been doing as form of rebellion or seditious conspiracy.  And then there is another one that prohibits advocating the overthrow of the US Government Constitution and laws, and Congress basically did that overthrow the US Government Constitution and laws by passing the Prep Act and by not repealing it.  Like every day that goes by that they are sitting in there and they know about this, which they do, and they don't put forward bills to repeal it, they're adding their own ratification of the treason.  And that's the ones who are there now, even if the ones who were there in 2005 are out of office now. 

The full interview.

SASHA LATYPOVA: most high profile law firms or any large corporate law firm even mid-size they are all conflicted they all work for the federal government and most of them work for the Department of Defense

9:58.  So I wondered between 2022, as I kept working on it, I kept writing about it, and April of 2022, I sent the information, because the reader suggested that I send it, I sent it to Aaron Siri.  I got no response from him.  I got a cursory response from Elizabeth Frame, who is one of his colleagues and then I didn't hear anything else. And by the middle of 2023, I came to the conclusion that they weren't talking about it either because they were totally in support of the overthrow, and they just want to get their piece of the financial whatever money is to be made in the process of continuing to fool people into thinking that the constitution is still operative, they wanted to get their piece.  Or they were so terrified by the implications of what it was and thought that there was nothing beneficial to be done, so they didn't even try.  They didn't speak up.  They didn't file cases.  They didn't, they just thought close your eyes, put your head in the sand, keep your mouth shut because this is too big and not to talk about it.  So those are my two guesses at this point about why the legal profession to whatever extent you can think of it as a monolithic thing, most of the prominent legal firms do not talk about this and I think that's why.

11:24.  In addition to that most high profile law firms or any large corporate law firm even mid-size they are all conflicted they all work for the federal government and most of them work for the Department of Defense, too, and they will not take these cases because the Department of Defense is behind this separation.  Also, besides being conflicted, even the individual practitioners will for the small individual practitioners, money, access to money and funding these cases is the first thing that comes to mind to prevent them from taking them because they see it and they're like you know there's no way I can raise so much money.  This takes hundreds of thousands of dollars and some cases might take millions of dollars to prosecute.  So they look at it, and say no way.  Large legal firms that have resources are conflicted and finally everyone is incentivized to ignore the Prep Act on both sides.  I just published an article this morning about 25 States, or 23 States and two governors, suing HHS and Kennedy for clawbacks of the COVID pandemic. 

PREP Act is a license to kill

PREP Act is a license to kill: https://t.co/Y58wFVwTKI https://t.co/F4jpWHoJwo

— sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" (@sasha_latypova) November 12, 2024

John Beaudoin.   

サーシャラティポワ氏はジェーン・ルビー博士のところに出ていたようだ。重要な指摘をしている。
『元製薬研究開発担当役員のサーシャ・ラティポワ(@sasha_latypova
)は、ジェーン・ルビー博士(@RealDrJaneRuby
)ジェーン・ルビー博士のショーでは、次期トランプ政権、特にRFK… https://t.co/i9Zc4yySq3

— trender FW (@TrenderF75892) November 12, 2024

Here is that one-page memo to which Sasha refers.

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 1986.  Thanks, Reagan.

MARY HOLLAND:🔥"The PREP Act, it...displants all law, and that can't be right...we absolutely have to get rid of the PREP Act. We have to get rid of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and we have to restore true prior free and informed consent."

🔥"The PREP Act, it...displants all law, and that can't be right...we absolutely have to get rid of the PREP Act. We have to get rid of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and we have to restore true prior free and informed consent." (1/2)

Children's Health Defense… pic.twitter.com/UvdrXMMlC4

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) September 29, 2024

"The PREP Act, it...displants all law, and that can't be right...we absolutely have to get rid of the PREP Act. We have to get rid of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and we have to restore true prior free and informed consent." (1/2) Children's Health Defense CEO Mary Holland (@maryhollandnyc) describes for retired pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas how the PREP Act—which provides immunity from liability, except for willful misconduct, for entities involved in the development, manufacturing, distribution, and administration of medical countermeasures during a public health emergency declared by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service—must be repealed. "The PREP Act, it...displants all law, and that can't be right...we absolutely have to get rid of the PREP Act," Holland says. She notes that the latest wildly egregious usage of PREP Act cover occurred in Vermont, where the state's supreme court ruled that the Windham Southeast Supervisory Union that oversees the public school system was immune from legal challenges brought by parents of a child who was "accidentally" given a COVID injection. See the story link in tweet two. Furthermore, Holland says that "We have to get rid of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and we have to restore true prior free and informed consent." Partial transcription of clip: "A terrible decision just came down from the Vermont Supreme Court that in a case where parents, said that they didn't want their child to get a COVID shot, but the COVID shot was given anyway at school. The case that the court dismissed it, saying, "Well, it's the PREP Act." The PREP Act, it suggests that it displants all law, and that can't be right. And that's one of the things it's a stepping stone in that fight against the PREP Act. But we absolutely have to get rid of the PREP Act. We have to get rid of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and we have to restore true prior free and informed consent. People need to be able to make their own health decisions on an individual basis. "We are not all the same. The idea that everybody gets the same I mean, so crazy, It's so at odds with everything else in medicine. Right? What's your weight? 

What's your height? What's your What's your medical history? That's normal medicine or used to be normal. And then they come out with a chemical that's in a bottle that you can't test, and they wanna have it be one size fits all. It's absurd." 

Story Link. 

Complete interview with Dr. Paul Thomas and Mary Holland.

LATYPOVA: . . . for practical purposes, homocide, as long as it's committed by the vaccine approved by CDC, is legal.

the laws have been amended and new ones have been introduced such that we have this now what she characterizes as the perfect legal cage in which nobody needs to be in on anything and no real corruption is really necessary.  --Sasha Latypova

Laws have been subverted, criminality has been legalised
Check out my latest podcast with @sasha_latypova pic.twitter.com/FB4EZ0d8Zy

— Dr Ahmad Malik (@DocAhmadMalik) March 20, 2024

So the laws have been amended and new ones have been introduced such that we have this now what she characterizes as the perfect legal cage in which nobody needs to be in on anything and no real corruption is really necessary.  Because for practical purposes, homocide, as long as it's committed by the vaccine approved by CDC, is legal.  That's the net effect of these laws.  So the combination of public health emergency declaration, and use of EUA countermeasures, which only exist under active public health emergency declaration, which is the PREP Act Declaration, issued by HHS Secretary.  So as long as they use those, they can kill and injure as many people as they want.  And they can never be prosecuted because they've been given almost blanket liability protection with this PREP Act with the exception of willful misconduct.  And the way that willful misconduct is defined in their legal opinion letters published on their website.  It says that as long as you follow our orders, it's not willful misconduct.  In fact, they are prosecuting people for not following HHS orders, for not using Remdesivir that shuts down kidneys and kills people, for not using ventilators, for not doing all those atrocities.  If they refuse, they get prosecuted.  But if they don't refuse it and follow the orders, it's not willful misconduct and you can't really prosecute . . . .

The 11th Amendment to the PREP Act Justifies "uninterrupted medicalized martial law nationwide, as directed by HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, effective May 11, 2023"

Fine.  So when the government begins to push the vaccines or boosters in the fall of 2023, stay OUT OF DATE, NOT UP TO DATE.  Meaning, no more vaccines.  They're not vaccines, right?   

Thank you to Katherine Watt @ Bailiwick News.

‘Vaccines’ are not medicines. They are camouflaged weapons of covert war.

Brook Jackson’s False Claims Act case, from her first report to the Food and Drug Administration on Sept. 25, 2020, about clinical trial fraud she witnessed, through her formal report to the Department of Defense on Dec. 14, 2020, to the order of dismissal filed by a federal judge on March 31, 2023, has revealed that all products labeled and promoted by the US Government (military and health officials) as ‘vaccines’ are presumptively biochemical weapons manufactured by pharmaceutical companies, to war department (DoD) specifications, to intentionally injure recipients, under military weapons procurement contracts.

Vaccines for the fall of 2023 have already been prepared, and by prepared, I mean the legal shields have been set up, the propaganda campaign has been tested, and the rollout with start without a glitch.  

The next round of heavily-pushed toxic injections will probably be the Fall 2023 Covid-flu-RSV formulation, which has been PREP-Act supported (for manufacturer and batterer impunity from criminal prosecution for medical battery and homicide) by the most-recent Public Health Emergency declaration formulation. 

Did you know that we are in the middle of uninterrupted medical martial law in the United States even though Joe Biden declared the COVID-19 threat was over back in June 2023?

The eleventh amendment to the original, March 10, 2020 declaration under the PREP Act for medical countermeasures against COVID-19, identifies “the burden on healthcare providers caused by coterminous seasonal influenza infections and COVID-19 infections” as the “category of disease, health condition or health threat” justifying uninterrupted medicalized martial law nationwide, as directed by HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, effective May 11, 2023. 

So, what, then, can we do?  The best we can do is to stay out of date, instead of staying up to date with any vaccine.  Why, oh, why, please do tell.  

Please, heed Katherine Watt's advice:

I, therefore, urge readers to stay out of date.

Steer clear of the men and women stationed in retail pharmacies. They are military mercenaries camouflaged in scrubs and white coats, armed with vials and hypodermic syringes of poison.

This is not medical advice.

This is self-defense advice.

‘Vaccines’ are not medicines. They are camouflaged weapons of covert war.

The bear is already in the house.

ISRAEL: MADE SECRET DEAL WITH PFIZER

Does this mean that all countries where the vaccine is being implemented in lieu of more effective and less toxic substances also made deals with the different vaccine manufacturers?  I wonder when we're going to hear about the deals that Pfizer, Moderna, J & J, and others made with the United States.  Actually, the PREP Act gives total immunity to Pfizer's vaccines from any liability to vaccine damages.  Brazil and Argentina, both willing to throw their citizens under the bus, put up as collateral military bases and bank reserves.  From the Greg Reese video in the above link:

The companies would not be responsible for adverse effects, or their own negligence—fraud or malice.  Pfizer then demanded that the nation’s bank reserves, military bases, and embassy buildings as collateral against future vaccine damages.  In brazil, Pfizer asked for vast money reserves to be put into foreign bank accounts, that Pfizer be exempt from the law of the land, and be exempt from any side effects and all civil liability.  In the United States, the Public Readiness & Emergency Preparedness Act, or PREP Act, gives total immunity to Pfizer and all manufacturers of experimental jabs.  So there’s no reason to threaten any government agency in the U.S.  They always knew how dangerous the radical and experimental mRNA jabs actually are.  It’s what the science says.  The only ones who say otherwise are the bureaucrats and pop culture media agents working for Big Pharma.  By every measure, this is the greatest crime ever committed by Big Pharma out of a long list, their magnum opus for the dark arts, death, and depopulation.  And they were setting up governments to take the fall so that the bankers can have their great reset without any resistance.

If this isn't one more example of full-proof evidence that your government has never sought your best interests but only your demise on your dime and then blaming you, well, I don't know what else I can offer.  For a general warning as to what government is about, I highly recommend that you read Murray Rothbard's 1974 essay, "Anatomy of the State."  And when you finish that, get yourself a copy of R. J. Rommel's 1994, Death by Government: Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1900.  

I'm back. Twitter saw the light. Israel did make a secret deal with with Pfizer. Here are more deets.  https://t.co/NJeYYv1JdC

— James Lyons-Weiler (@lifebiomedguru) January 8, 2022

Christine Anderson of the European Parliament has already reminded us.  Forget no longer.  Never forget.  Never forgive.  Hold the line.   

Must Watch Very Powerful.

“In the entire history of mankind there has never been a political elite sincerely concerned about the wellbeing of regular people. What makes any of us think that it is different now. - Christine Anderson European Parliament.” pic.twitter.com/oSVYzg81p5

— Sikh For Truth (@SikhForTruth) October 29, 2021