SASHA LATYPOVA: most high profile law firms or any large corporate law firm even mid-size they are all conflicted they all work for the federal government and most of them work for the Department of Defense

9:58.  So I wondered between 2022, as I kept working on it, I kept writing about it, and April of 2022, I sent the information, because the reader suggested that I send it, I sent it to Aaron Siri.  I got no response from him.  I got a cursory response from Elizabeth Frame, who is one of his colleagues and then I didn't hear anything else. And by the middle of 2023, I came to the conclusion that they weren't talking about it either because they were totally in support of the overthrow, and they just want to get their piece of the financial whatever money is to be made in the process of continuing to fool people into thinking that the constitution is still operative, they wanted to get their piece.  Or they were so terrified by the implications of what it was and thought that there was nothing beneficial to be done, so they didn't even try.  They didn't speak up.  They didn't file cases.  They didn't, they just thought close your eyes, put your head in the sand, keep your mouth shut because this is too big and not to talk about it.  So those are my two guesses at this point about why the legal profession to whatever extent you can think of it as a monolithic thing, most of the prominent legal firms do not talk about this and I think that's why.

11:24.  In addition to that most high profile law firms or any large corporate law firm even mid-size they are all conflicted they all work for the federal government and most of them work for the Department of Defense, too, and they will not take these cases because the Department of Defense is behind this separation.  Also, besides being conflicted, even the individual practitioners will for the small individual practitioners, money, access to money and funding these cases is the first thing that comes to mind to prevent them from taking them because they see it and they're like you know there's no way I can raise so much money.  This takes hundreds of thousands of dollars and some cases might take millions of dollars to prosecute.  So they look at it, and say no way.  Large legal firms that have resources are conflicted and finally everyone is incentivized to ignore the Prep Act on both sides.  I just published an article this morning about 25 States, or 23 States and two governors, suing HHS and Kennedy for clawbacks of the COVID pandemic. 

LATYPOVA: When there's a CDC rep waltzing into your hospital room to your loved one, kick them out of there. The CDC rep is not their healthcare provider. Your loved one in the hospital does not have to speak with them.

Pay attention here https://t.co/qlXjs6Y9nS

— Brook Jackson 💜 (@IamBrookJackson) June 3, 2024

Part of it was that lawsuit that the 15 attorneys general of the states abandoned it should be refiled by somebody.  And I'm hoping that we can find an attorney general of a state that will work on this because it violates the Constitution and violates due process.  They name you a pre-communicable, and you have no ability to defend yourself.  So they name you pre-communicable based on the test that they design, that they keep secret, that they that have never produced evidence of or validation, and then they put you in the detention camp and you can appeal to them only.  So it is as Orwellian and as tyrannical as it gets.  

1:00. When you look at some of the wording of this order where Lisa Rotz, MD, Deputy Director of the Division of Global Migration and Quarantine Centers for CDC.

CDC has determined that you are a high-risk contact to a family member who tested positive for infection with COVID-19.  The last date of high risk exposure was March 23, 2020 the date that you last had contact with the infected family member, and, accordingly, quarantine for you is extended by 14 days from the date of the last known high-risk exposure, which was March 23, 2020.  This notice will be accompanied by a rescission allowing you to agree to serve the remainder of the quarantine at your residence subject to certain stipulations. 

1:43. Like you said Sasha, don't answer any questions; don't consent to track and trace; don't give names of anybody you've been with.  They could scare you into doing that though because it says you were in contact with a family member family, a member who had a big mouth disclosed it (I'm going to put my own editorializing in), for infection with COVID-19.  The last date of high-risk exposure was March 23, 2020, the date that you last had contact and that, accordingly, quarantine for you is extended by 14 days from the date of last known risk exposure.  Some people might argue and say, "Well, back then we all just stayed home.  Nobody took us to a quarantine camp."  

What Sasha is warning is they can do any of this at any time.

And all of Katherine's work is to inform people that they can pull this out again.  This is living law.  It hasn't gone anywhere,  although you don't hear about COVID too much anymore.  It's living, breathing law that's ready at any moment, right?

2:45. Yeah, and I think, specifically the Grand Princess and The Diamond Princess were the test runs for them, for the HHS because then they later refer to that in their motions to dismiss cases that were challenging their authority to do so.  They said, "We already did it.  You see, we did it, and it's totally legal." That's the precedent that they set up as early as they could in the pandemic lockdown by taking these 2 cruise ships and the people from these two cruise ships.  

PLAN OF ACTION

So I would advise people what you can do is a couple of things. First, you have to be aware of this.  When you are aware of this, mass awareness is a deterrent when enough people know this.  When there's a CDC rep waltzing into your hospital room to your loved one, kick them out of there.  The CDC rep is not their healthcare provider.  Your loved one in the hospital does not have to speak with them.  All of this is voluntary.  They come in and they say, "Well, you know, you need to answer these questions for our survey . . . ."  No.  No.  And because people are nice and they think "I'm in the hospital.  This is all related to my care."  It's not related to your care.  It's related to this, the CDC's Quarantine Extension.  So kick them out.  Don't answer their questions.  Secondly, don't go on a cruise ship . . . .  If anybody approaches you with these kinds of things, wherever you are traveling, beware of what they're trying to do.  

And finally, an important aspect of this is to work with local state authorities and legislators in your state to nullify these laws.  Katherine is drafting a lot of document templates on nullification.  So you can read that on her substack, Bailiwick News, and you will see a bunch of proposed notifications of those laws so the state legislators can do it.  Any state can nullify any federal law. 

FAUCI'S EMAILS & BOTH THE FDA & HHS KNEW ABOUT SHEDDING - DR. RICHARD FLEMING

"The virus inconsistent with evolutionary theory."  In other words, this is not naturally evolving.  Meaning it's man-made inside one of Fauci-funded, NIH [meaning American-tax-funded laboratories].  Good to know that the FDA and HHS [the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services] both knew that viral shedding from the vaccines existed.  In fact, they knew this back in 2015.  It is just amazing how every single one of the government agencies involved in health are out to kill Americans.  Huh.  

If you're looking for the best information on COVID-19 or COVID-19 vaccines, spike proteins, the legal and practical approach to Fauci's fraud is to read Dr. Richard Fleming.  He is one of the most ethical doctors I've heard yet on the internet.  

What's interesting is that at the 4:41 mark is that Fleming cites the work done by Luc Montagne, pointing out that Montagne discovered the HIV gene sequences in the SARS-CoV-2 virus.  So there are genetic splices into that virus, making it more infectious and more lethal that in effect can turn the body's immune system on so that it attacks its tissue, like multiple sclerosis.