Sunday, October 31, 2021

This may be the most horrific thing I've ever seen.

Changing the Definition of Gain-of-Function to Protect Fauci

NASA scientists & engineers at JPL are protesting against the White House vaccine mandate Monday, November 1, 2021

DR. ARIYANA LOVE: Transfecting Humans Into New Species. Targeting nerve cells and embryonic cells in humans, causing neurodegenerative reactions, like prion.

These COVID-19 vaccines contain the Lentivirusgenus of retroviruses  that cause chronic and deadly diseases characterized by long incubation periods, in humans and other mammalian species.[1] The genus includes the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which causes AIDS.

Who is Dr. Ariyana Love?  Start at her website and be sure to check out her Facebook page.  I made this post on Sunday, October 32, 2021, and by Thursday, November 4, maybe earlier, Dr. Ariyana Love's FB page was taken down.  Why and by whom, I don't know.    

Peters opens by citing indirectly his interview with Dr. Carrie Madej who reported seeing under a microscope a hydra vulgaris in both the J & J vaccine and the Moderna vaccine, the prominent vaccines distributed in the U.S.  Folks I've spoken to who've been vaccinated were vaccinated with either of these two; the third vaccine is, of course, Pfizer's Biotech.  No one I know took the Pfizer vaccine.  So here Peters is working on chasing down more information on the hydra vulgaris.  He explains that they are fresh water parasites.  And as he introduces Dr. Ariyana Love, he explains that she is a holistic doctor from Finland and explains that Dr. Love affirms the presence of parasites in the vaccines and that they are being used to turn people, turn human beings into a new hybrid species.  

Okay, not a bad opening.  But what Peters fails to ask is what are the characteristics of the new species that we're all supposed to become?  The subheading in Peters presentation reads, "HYDRAS CREATE HYBRIDS."

1.  How are they able to survive in storage temperatures of 70° below Fahrenheit?  Dr. Love did not have answer; said that she doesn't know. 

2.  The hydras are first genetically modified in a lab in the University of Kiev, and they are transfected; so these are not natural organisms anymore.  That's an important point and distinction, because when I first learned of the hydra vulgaris, I understood them to be naturally occurring and that with that characteristic they could somehow be dealt with.  The fact that they are genetically modified changes everything.  

3. How did you find out that these hydras were being genetically modified from that specific lab?  People are going to ask, "Where's your proof?"  She explains that she's read through peer-review journals on gain-of-function, loss-of-function, research and reports that were funded by the NIH, Anthony Fauci, and partly by DARPA.  

PETERS:  Okay, so these are open-sourced documents that people can find . . .  can you send them to me so that I can post them at StewPeters.tv

This article states that Dr. Love is a former Pfizer employee and current analyst for pharmaceutical and medical device industries."  If she's a former Pfizer employee, why would the documentation on this transfection be so difficult for her?  

4.  How do you supposed a fresh-water organism is surviving in the human blood stream, for obviously the human blood stream is not fresh water?  She couldn't answer that question, but just said that the hydras and their characteristics are in all these studies.  What studies?  I even when to the StewPeters.tv sites and couldn't find them there either.  In fact, I left that question on this particular presentation.  Haven't heard back . . . as of 2:45pm  October 31, 2021.  The studies openly admit the presence of hydras.  as well as the mechanism, er, their operating system, [operating system?  Sounds like a computer.], how they work, yeah.  

PETERS, 3:08: You claim that hydras are specifically there to create hybrid human beings.  What do you mean by that? 

LOVE:  Yeah, they're used to transfect humans.  They're carriers, they're carrying, . . . well, the human genome project started in 2000, and hydra vulgaris is used in the genome assembly, the human genome assembly, which is for transfecting humans.  And what they've done is transfected the hydras and parasites for cross-species genomics at the University of Kiev, and they're transfecting the hydras with the Lentivirus.  They're also using Laciferous or Luciferase.  And basically, the Lentivirus is the spike protein that everyone is talking about.  It is the most deadly bioweapon, gain-of-function bioweapon ever created: and that's SARS, MERS, HIV1 thru 3, and SRV1, or Simian Retrovirus I, which induces AIDS.

PETERS: So, are you saying that people who receive this inoculation are actually being given these viruses--SARS, MERS, HIV, AIDS? 

She nods in the affirmative.  They're not only being given it, they're being transfected with it.  So basically, the hydra and parasite species with their new genetic coding is being fused into the tissue of humans, and they're becoming one.  They also figured out a way to get the cell signaling to match and to harmonize so that--it's called cantoning signaling--so that humans become a new genetically-modified organism. 

PETERS:  Insane.  

LOVE:  She nods in the affirmative. 

PETERS, 4:54:  So hydras are small, but they aren't a single-celled organism. they're several millimeters in length, so how exactly are these things rewriting people's DNA?   

LOVE:  Okay, the embryos are double-celled organisms, and that's what they transfect.  And they grow into a larger size and they multiply in the body when they come into contact with graphene oxide.  They will multiply rapidly.  So they're using this technology called CRISPR-Cas9 and BLAST and they use a process called [transfection] electroporation, using electrodes on programmable gold nano-bots.  And this is how they're targeting the cell organelles of the nuclei.  

PETERS, 5:40:  Who's is manufacturing these gold nanobots?  

LOVE:  I don't know who's manufacturing that.  I can look into it a bit more, but I know who funded it--and that's Anthony Fauci, the NIH, and partly DARPA.  

PETERS:  So you have receipts showing that Anthony Fauci is funding the production of these gold nanobots?  Isn't the purpose of an electrode just to conduct electricity?  How is it rewriting DNA? 

LOVE, 6:05:  Yeah, see I am not a scientist, so the actual process of transfection . . . was very hard for me to grasp this, but I somehow managed to get this far.  So there's one other thing that's really important that needs to be mentioned, and that's that in these studies, I found that they're targeting nerve cells and embryonic cells in humans, so this is why we're seeing the neurodegenerative and auto-immune reaction to the vax, which is prion.  But they're also targeting the embryonic cells in the testes and ovaries.  Which means they are transfecting and cloning the offspring of the vaxxed as well.  And this means that they're basically producing a new hybrid species using humans.  

PETERS, 6:55:  So, if Tom is vaccinated and he procreates with Jane, and they have a child, that child is not human? 

LOVE:  They are gene-silencing.  So they're silencing, turning off certain genetics that they don't want in the human and programming and coding new genetics that they do want there.  So, they're also wiring a new brain and a new nervous system in humans, and a third strand to the DNA.  So they're taking the 2.0 organic humans and transfecting them into 3.0 hybrids.   

PETERS:  Coming up, we'll be talking to Melissa Mcatee.  She's a Pfizer employee, a whistleblower for the manufacturing department.  I want to ask you, How is it that they're able to get away with all of this?  Are the people working at Pfizer in the manufacturing department, for example, or the people working at Moderna, J & J, millions of people outside, world leaders and government officials complicit in this, this lock-step effort, do they all know this and they're all staying quiet?  Or are they not aware of what they're purposing and for what agenda they're serving?  And I know you don't know this definitively, but I am just asking, what is your feeling on that?  Why are people remaining silent on this, I mean the people putting this together, working for Pfizer and all these other companies I just mentioned, do they know what they're manufacturing and they're doing it anyways?  

LOVE, 8:40:  I think the ones at the top have to know, of course.  They developed the technology.  But not everybody knows.  Not everybody in government knows.  Not all of the doctors know.  It's hard to fathom; it's hard to comprehend it, the evil agenda that this is.  This is not a vaccine, it's a weapons system and we're under biological attack.  And we have no option but to resist, and I think the people who have been vaccinated have a moral obligation not to produce any offspring.  Because their kids are not human; they do not carry the God-given genetics that humans have.  And they will be a new species, and they can mix and match.  With the Luciferase, they can 24/7 track, eh, trace these humans, or these genetically-modified humans.  They can upgrade, up-regulate and down-regulate genetics externally at will.  They can change people's genetic codes using the internet.  [how is that done?]  And it's through the eukaryotic genome annotation pipeline.  It's a website, an external database that monitoring and controlling transgenic humans.  All of this is out in the open and online.  

PETERS, 9:55:  What made you as a holistic doctor made you began looking into this?  Were you treating patients who were having adverse reactions, side-effects, or what I now refer to as intended consequences from being jabbed with this serum? 

LOVE:  People started coming to me and asking me for help.  I realized that my knowledge was needed, so I just stepped up and began researching anything that could help to detoxify graphene oxide toxicity from the body and to help protect your body from this biological attack.  So people saw what I was doing and they started reaching out to me and it snowballed from there.   

PETERS:  I've seen movies that depict stuff like this; I never thought I'd be living in times having legitimate conversations on a platform like this one, or that I would be hosting a platform where we were talking seriously about transfection and repurposing humans, giving them a new genetic code through a shot that is being mandated for the world.  I'll give you the final word. 

LOVE:  People need to understand that we need to be responsible: no more shots.  No more vaccines.  No more jabs.  No more of these PCR nasal probes because they're gathering DNA to continue this vicious assault.

PETERS:  So when a doctor swabs, you, anybody else, a nurse, with the failed PCR test that's been recalled, the DNA that's on there is then sent elsewhere for a study?  

LOVE:  Yeah, absolutely.  It's being harvested . . . collected by Israel.  As Karen Kingston, former Pfizer employee and biotech analyst, revealed earlier, the Israeli Zionist agents own the patents . . . are owning many of these patents.  So, yeah, it's a new world order system, and they are working together to take over.  They don't want humans anymore.  This is an anti-human agenda.  

Peters concludes by saying don't be fearful after he's just scared the shit out of any conscientious being.  

Peters recommended Dr. Vladimir Zelenko's COVID protocol, but I thought that COVID had a 99.8% survival rate.  Why all the panic for medical intervention on COVID-19?  Can Zelenko's protocol treat the vaccinated or how about the unvaccinated who've suffered what Dr. Judy Mikovits called the "Vaccinated COVID" via shedding from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated?  

At the 3:45 mark in Peters' interview with Dr. Ariyana Love, she mentions Luciferase.  I thought that Dr. Carrie Madej did a good job explaining this, so I've linked her video here and my transcription of that follows. 


Elon Musk, Ray Kurzweil, these guys are proponents of Humans 2.0.  

Moderna was one of the frontrunner for the COVID-19 vaccine.  Moderna was founded by a guy from Harvard, Derek Rossi, and this researcher was successful in taking some modified RNA and reprogrammed a stem cell in the body and changed the function of a stem cell.  He actually made it genetically modified.  He proved that you can genetically modified something by using genetically modified RNA.  So Rossi and his investors founded the company Moderna on this concept.  It's kind of a new kid on the block.  Okay, it's not been around that long.  In fact, Moderna has not made any vaccine for a human before.  It's made no medicine for humans before.  This will be their first-run.  Moderna was in the news recently because it fast-tracked its vaccine, going from Phase I to Phase II very, very quickly.  In fact, it's gone from Phase I to Phase III in its experiments from March of 2020 until currently [say, December 2020 or January 2021].  That's unbelievable; usually it takes 5 to 6 years.  How were they able to do this with safety and efficacy data that we need.  In Phase II, they're only using between 30 and 45 humans.  In Moderna's test study, they only used 45 humans, and with the high-dose vaccine in Group A, 100% of those people got systemic side-effects.  100%.  That's only in the short-term side-effects profile.  In the low-dose vaccine, 80% got short-term systemic side-effects.  Now, we don't even know the long-term side-effects from that.  We would need a lot longer time, right, maybe years.  But we do know based on previous animal studies that using this technology that you can expect increased cancer rates, increased mutant genes (mutagenisis), increased auto-immune reactions.  In some of the ferret studies, they found that when the ferret was introduced to the virus that they were trying to protect the ferret from that the ferret had an exaggerated immune response that actually hurt the ferret that the ferret had more lung inflammation, more lung fluid, and some problems with their liver.  It actually hurt them; they had a poorer response.  Those were longer-term reactions but we don't know . . . we haven't seen the data yet, so it's not without risks. 

How are they doing this?  

Well, they're actually suggesting to use a platform, how will they administer the vaccine?  There's an idea called Microneedle Platform developed by MIT. They said it can be easily produced, and mass produced, which is why they're proposing this technology because millions of vaccines can be made quickly.  They can also be administered by yourself.  The idea is to get a band-aid you buy at the drug store, it's shipped to you by Amazon, take it out of the package, and put it on your hand, take the sticker off, and voila, you've been vaccinated.  How is that possible?  Well, in this band-aid there are little tiny spicules, designed after a snake, viper-fang bite.  [6:32] so little snake bites.  So anyway, in these tiny little spicules, they claim that you really won't feel it that much.  So there's a little hydrogel, it's a material called hydrogel, would be a Luciferase enzyme as well as the vaccine itself.  Okay, so what is all that?  So first of all you're getting the vaccine--it's modified RNA or modified DNA--Moderna, modified RNA.  In that modified RNA, the idea is that it would the microneedles would puncture into your cell membrane, and this synthetic piece of an RNA, it's a code, it's a part for the virus where they could use a synthetic DNA, the code for the part of the virus would go into your nucleus.  Your body would start transcribing it, it would start reading it and make more of that part of the virus [7:31].  

Every single word of this!

Mercola interviews Catherine Austin Fitts

Dr. Mercola interviews Catherine Austin Fitts, who references her article titled, "The Injection Fraud," posted over at Children's Health Defense.  

The discussion turns on informed consent at the 10:45 mark, and they showed how informed consent is impossible given the fact that the ingredients in the vaccines are unknown. Oh, it's true that a list of ingredients exists but there are lots of ingredients in the vaccines that are not on the list.  So it's impossible to give consent when you don't know all of the ingredients in the vaccines.  

Saturday, October 30, 2021

Does the Country Need a Dose of DeSantis?

New Zealand finally awakens today against their authoritarian Prime Minister

Because of this gem, . . . 
Folks take to the streets . . . as they should.  

Then and Now . . .

"We are insane."

. . . as his 14-year-old son was hooked up to heart monitors after his [2nd Pfizer] shot, Dr. Shane Huntington says "I have a 9-year-old [and] he’ll be getting vaccinated as well.” Dear God . . .

Friday, October 29, 2021

Who’s more corrupt: Pfizer, unethical doctor, or media?

COVID-19 SYMPOSIUM [FEBRUARY] 2021: DR BYRAM BRIDLE, VIRAL IMMUNOLOGIST, UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH

This YouTube video was published back on February 14, 2021. 

Those being vaccinated now are part of Phase III clinical experiment, and the companies have openly acknowledged this to the agencies, regulatory agencies because . . . for example, there's a minimum of time for which they have to track things like, ah, safety of the vaccine.  Indeed, they've even indicated . . . so most people . . . we're used to . . . as scientists to being able to see published scientifically peer-reviewed data before the vaccines are rolled out and this won't happen probably for about two more years, and the reason for this is that it's going to take that long to complete the Phase III clinical trials.  A Phase III clinical trial cannot be declared complete until they have monitored the safety of the vaccine for multiple years.  This is important to keep in mind.  So as a consequence, these have been approved in a remarkable time but that alone has raised legitimate questions that are unique to these coronavirus vaccines.  And I also want to highlight the nature of the virus itself and I'll get into this in a little bit.  And as well, some perplexing decisions about the rollout have legitimate questions.  COVID-19 vaccines have indeed raised hopes that the pandemic is nearing an end.  I, like all others, am hopeful that this is the case, because we'd all like to get out of these severe lockdowns or isolation.  But I want to highlight some potential sticking points.  As an academic scientist and a public servant, I hope the end is near, but if the vaccine rollout does not go as planned, I don't want anybody asking the question, "Why didn't anybody tell me that there was a possibility of a failure with the rollout?"  So I just want to   

POTENTIAL STICKING POINTS TO THE VACCINES [Remember, these were questions raised back on February 14, 2021]

As a viral immunologist who develops immunization strategies to prevent infectious diseases and treat cancers, I would like to highlight outstanding questions I have been repeatedly asked about the emergency use of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which is the causative agent of the coronavirus disease that emerged in 2019 (COVID-19).

1.  What is the long-term safety of COVID-19 vaccines? 
2.  COVID-19 vaccines are being distributed with uniquely short safety profiles (months-worth).  These didn’t exist three months ago.   Safety assessment starts in Phase I, but need to be confirmed in Phase III. 
3.  Short-term safety profiles of the approved COVID-19 vaccines looks good.  You have to do your own risk assessment of the value of the vaccines. 
4.  However, induction of anaphylactic reactions in a very small percentage of vaccine recipients hasn’t helped the optics for those with vaccine hesitancy.
5.  Some questions have also arisen about vaccinating the frail elderly:
6.  23 frail elderly individuals in Norway died shortly after receiving the Pfizer vaccine.
7.  UK open letter: increase in non-COVID deaths in long-term care homes compared to before the vaccines.  It is difficult to ascertain the reason for these deaths; they may have had nothing to do with the vaccines.
8.  However, too many unpredicted severe long-term side-effects accruing over time could be cause for withdrawal of approval for a vaccine.  

“In the entire history of mankind there has never been a political elite sincerely concerned about the wellbeing of regular people"

The Regime Provides a Fix for Every Problem That Ails Them

Thursday, October 28, 2021

Three Ohio judges "die unexpectedly" in nine-day span after vaxx mandate in Cuyahoga County

The Catholic Church Is Irrevocably Lost

Thank you, Becky Akers @ Lew Rockwell

The incident took place at St. Frances Cabrini Parish in Lakewood, Washington state.  Apparently, there was an undefined conflict between the parishioner and the priest, which led to a few remarks on the Church's Facebook page, 

Your priest and congregation should repent. Evil was brought into the light,' sad another Facebook user.

All he did was kneel down and start praying and your priest pointed at him and said he is trespassing. Pure evil in your church. Then your members instead of peacefully speaking with him violently removed him and swarmed him. 

It does seem to me that the church is following state mandates in direct violation of the Church's brand of helping the sick and poor.   

Becky Akers @ Lew Rockwell penned the following remarks, 

I’m not a Roman Catholic, but the physical fight one diaperless man of courage sparked at the very altar of this church should infuriate every Christian with its sacrilege. The “priest” and accomplices from the congregation would rather beat and then bodily remove a victim who dared show his face as God created it than worship the Lord. Indeed, they’ll even interrupt their service for such evil.

Everlasting shame on these apostates (and they’re not only apostates but cowards: 15 or so of these Neanderthals pile onto a lone man. Oh, and this is a “woke” assembly: at least one woman joins them in their assault). Our Lord reprimanded those who tried to keep little children from Him, let alone “outcasts” such as the Jabbed hope to make of the Unjabbed. But heretics brawling near His body and blood plunges this wickedness to new and fathomless depths.

The gentleman who sent me this video did so with a note expressing his contempt for the mendacious medical profession:

I’m at the point where I’m so disgusted that I never want to see another doctor again.  My wife’s doctor tried to talk her into getting the gene therapy.

She asked him, “What are the results of the long-term studies?”  He had no answer.  I wonder how much he gets paid for every person he talks into getting this crap?

I feel the same about traditional physicians but extend it to the “church” under Parson Goat as well. I will never again attend any parish that cooperates in any way with the Satanic Marxism of the plandemic. But these hypocrites, roughing up guests brave enough to defy COVIDCon …  well, may these sinners fall into the hands of a God far angrier than I can ever be. 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST OF CRIMINAL PROPORTION: FDA Committee Reviewing Pfizer Vaccine for Children Have Worked for Pfizer. BIG SURPRISE THERE

 Authored by Patrick Howley via National File,


The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee is holding a virtual meeting Tuesday, October 26 to discuss authorizing a Pfizer-BioNTech Coronavirus vaccine for children between the ages of 5 to 11 years old.

This committee has a lot of sway with the FDA and their findings will be relevant, considering the Biden administration is getting ready to ship vaccines to elementary schools and California has already mandated the vaccine for schoolchildren pending federal authorization.

But the meeting roster shows that numerous members of the committee and temporary voting members have worked for Pfizer or have major connections to Pfizer.

Members include a former vice president of Pfizer Vaccines, a recent Pfizer consultant, a recent Pfizer research grant recipient, a man who mentored a current top Pfizer vaccine executive, a man who runs a center that gives out Pfizer vaccines, the chair of a Pfizer data group, a guy who was proudly photographed taking a Pfizer vaccine, and numerous people who are already on the record supporting Coronavirus vaccines for children. Meanwhile, recent FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb is on Pfizer’s board of directors

HERE’S THE MEETING ROSTER: Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee October 26, 2021 Meeting Draft Roster.

Acting Chair Arnold S. Monto was a paid Pfizer consultant as recently as 2018.

Steven Pergam got the Pfizer vaccine: Building trust in safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines (fredhutch.org)


Committee member Archana Chatterjee worked on a research project related to vaccines for infants between 2018-2020, and the research project was sponsored by Pfizer.



Myron Levine has mentored some U.S. post-doctoral fellows, and one of his proteges happens to be Raphael Simon, the senior director of vaccine research and development at Pfizer.



James Hildreth, a temporary voting member, made a financial interest disclosure for this meeting in which he disclosed more than $1.5 million in relevant financial interests, including his work as president of Meharry Medical College, which administers Pfizer Coronavirus vaccines.

Geeta K. Swamy is listed as the chair of the “Independent Data Monitoring Committee for the Pfizer Group B Streptococcus Vaccine Program,” a committee sponsored by Pfizer Duke University states that “Dr. Swamy serves as a co-investigator for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trial.”

Gregg Sylvester previously served as a vice president for Pfizer Vaccines, where he launched Pfizer vaccines including one for children.

Among the meeting’s “temporary voting members,” Ofer Levy, Boston Children’s Hospital, is for the Pfizer vaccine for children, Eric Rubin is pro-vaccine for children, Jay Portnoy supports authorizing Coronavirus vaccines for kids, and Melinda Wharton complained over the summer about how orders for the CDC’s “Vaccines For Children” program dropped.

FDANews stated last December: “FDA advisory committee members in the past have frequently been the target of heavy politicking by industry representatives of whatever drug they were considering for a recommendation at in-person meetings. That process has been somewhat altered by the fact that during COVID-19, meetings are being held virtually. But it’s likely that behind-the-scenes pressuring still goes on. The industry defends the attempts to influence committee members as simply efforts to best present their case.”

In short, a staggering conflict of interest . . . 



Follow Patrick on Twitter @HowleyReporter and at gab.com/patrickreports

 

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: scientific evidence that covid is crime against humanity

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: scientific evidence that covid is a crime against humanity

Thank you to Lew Rockwell

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts"

NIH ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS: 89% of preclinical experiments can’t even be reproduced—which is fundamental to good science—resulting in an annual waste of $28 billion.

Good to see that PETA has been on the attack of Fauci and Collins for a while, for experiments like these.   

90% of studies on animals ultimately fail to produce viable medications for humans. Yet, half of NIH funding goes toward experiments on animals.  She said that animals are cheap, universities and agencies receive large amounts of funding to carry out these “experiments,” and most of them are done in secrecy.


Thanks to Martin Armstrong.  

(From PETA’s website: “To keep driving the message home, PETA supporters in giant blow-up dinosaur costumes have been following the president to various events carrying signs that read, ‘Biden: Don’t Appoint Another NIH Dinosaur.’”

PETA has finally spoken out against Dr. Fauci’s cruel experiments on beagle puppies. When the news was first released, the agency was banning anyone who tweeted them about Fauci, but now, PETA is calling upon the Biden Administration to fire all National Institute of Health heads. Although PETA certainly has [its] own extremist views on other topics, they are making valid points about how utterly unnecessary these very expensive tests have been.

PETA Vice President Kathy Guillermo appeared on Tucker Carlson’s show in 2019 and explained how 90% of studies on animals ultimately fail to produce viable medications for humans. Yet, half of NIH funding goes toward experiments on animals. She said that animals are cheap, universities and agencies receive large amounts of funding to carry out these “experiments,” and most of them are done in secrecy.

Newsmax directly asked Guillermo if she thought Fauci should resign, and without hesitation, she said, “Yes!” As a reminder, the Food and Drug Administration does not require animal testing to pass new drugs. PETA has raised the flag and called for NIH Francis Collins to resign for conducting similarly cruel experiments. Fauci’s experiments “amounted to lies,” and Guillermo is now calling on Americans to urge President Biden to remove Fauci from office.

Billions of taxpayer dollars are going toward these experiments that have not produced any significant improvements toward human life. PETA’s page to remove Collins notes, “Eighty-nine percent of preclinical experiments can’t even be reproduced—which is fundamental to good science—resulting in an annual waste of $28 billion.” An annual waste of $28 billion is beyond alarming. Fauci has moved on to testing drug concoctions on humans, and we need to wake up and realize that we have become the new sample group.

Tuesday, October 26, 2021

REPORTING FROM CMS: Number one cause for underreporting was that the medical professionals didn't know anything about the [reporting] system.

So you're going to have babies; they're going to come out looking normal, and when they turn 18, 19, 20-years-old, they're not going to have any eggs to actually get pregnant with because these chemicals in these shots are known to be toxic to the developing eggs inside the ovaries of the developing females, . . .

The title of this video is Depopulation by Any Means: Dr. Bryan Ardis, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg.

At the 23:17 mark, Dr. Aris refers everybody to Thomas Renz's siteAmerica's Front Line Doctors.  MyFreeDoctor.com.  

32:00  Lawsuit filed on July 19 against the federal government was an injunction to stop the EUA of the vaccines.  Because one of the reporting services for CMS, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, there was a whistleblower who came forward and her statistical review of the data--just in CMS--shows from just 3 days after the shot is 45,000 deaths in that database alone.  And they have not extended the search out yet to 4 days post-vaccine, 5 days post-vaccine but they're going to do it.  That's what this actual lawsuit is about.  

The important thing is that in the FDA document published on October 22, 2020, they actually stated that they were going to be doing a rapid assessment of reporting coming in from injuries from the vaccines.  And they were going to be using this and they stated in that FDA document, "We're going to be trusting the CMS data to give us the best information that we can relay to the American public on these vaccines being safe and effective."  Do you know what system that was?   The CMS system and no one ever talked about that 45,000 deaths that were reported in the first 3 days of the shot reported into Medicare, which is typically the older generation in America, and Medicaid which are the impoverished individuals in America in just that 1 out of 11 reporting systems.  VAERS reported over 12,000 which is the reporting system into the Health and Human Services.  This whistleblower said that all of the numbers being reported are off by a factor of five.  She's a mathematician, 25 years of doing algorithm and health databases.  She said that the total count is off by a factor of FIVE.

34:00  Dr. Zelenko, Dr. Mercola, they're all convinced that the counting is off by TEN or even a HUNDRED times.  About these reporting systems, the University of Harvard in 2010 did a review of all reporting systems on vaccine injuries into the United States' agencies.  After a 3-year review, they found that it is less than 1%.  I hear that doctors and other people in the media that the counting is upwards of only 10% or less.  No, it's not.  The actual number in the document from Harvard Pilgrim--it's less than 1% of all reported.  So it doesn't matter what number you hear reported on deaths, it doesn't matter how many miscarriages or demyelinating diseases, or auto-immune diseases or Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), or how many hundreds now of Bell's Palsy that's been reported, you can add 2 ZEROS for every one of those figures to get close to what Harvard said is the actual data. 

35:35  VIVIANE FISCHER  Because some people [meaning medical care workers, people who do the reporting] think that they are with the vaccination program performing a vital and valuable service on behalf of society, that they might not report the adverse effects of the vaccines for fear of its disasters could bring the vaccine campaign to a halt.  We had problems too at a convalescent home in Berlin, where out of 13 people who were vaccinated 8 died.  That was never reported.  I mean who died shortly after vaccination.

ARDIS  In that document from Harvard, it actually states that the #1 cause for underreporting was that the medical professionals didn't know anything about the [reporting] system.  #2 was that if they wrote it down in their records, the doctor would have to go down to the VAERS data system and actually report it a second time and it got in the way of the workflow experience in the office for the doctors.  When Harvard approached the CDC at the end of the 3 years, they asked them to allow Harvard to help them develop a better system of reporting.  The CDC took the consultant away from the Harvard Review study and told them, "No more that we're going to assist Harvard and all in that initiative."  So there's been no change since then.  And I will say that you guys have had some frontline American doctors on there, Dr. Lee Merritt, who said that it was very obvious that a patient who had just received a vaccine, a teenager, immediately went into Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).  And she looked at the doctor who was trying to get the teenager up onto the gurney and this doctor is the one who is treating this patient, she said, "When did she receive her vaccine?"  

DOCTOR:  It was just an hour earlier.  

38:00  And she said, "This is Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).  This is the first listed side-effect on the FDA's guide in October.  And she looked at the doctor, who is a colleague of hers, and asked, "Are you going to report this to VAERS?"

And his response was, "What's VAERS?"

So, yes, there is a huge amount of underreporting, for sure.  I would suspect, for sure, based on this whistleblower coming out, that Thomas Renz has filed this lawsuit on behalf of America's Frontline Doctors, that when it's a factor of FIVE, you have to estimate that it's at least a [factor of] TEN.  For sure, the actual numbers are 45,000 just within 3 days of getting the shots.  

WOLFGANG WODARG:  I just spoke about the incentives for the doctors to tell something or not to tell it.  And that depends on what to charge for it and it depends on whether they feel they have made a mistake, then they would not like to say it.  If they gave a vaccination, they would not like so much to tell it to anybody if something happens.  So there are such problems, which distort all statistics, and we have to keep this in mind.  And I mam very sure that we have much more side effects with this so-called vaccination than we have in the numbers and the statistics in all administrations 

39:30  In Germany, it wouldn't be just the doctor who does the vaccination who would need to report this but if a doctor has a patient, just what we heard earlier from Ardis, so if someone comes to the doctor and says, "I just had a vaccination, and I have a rash or headache or something, the doctor at a vaccination clinic would also have to report in fact.  

40:35  On the FDA slide #16, in October 22, 2020, there is a side effect listed on there.  It is called Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in Children, MIS-C, a brand new disease that's only been created and given a diagnostic code since 2020.  We all know that COVID, or SARS-CoV-2, was a very little threat to children and to pregnant women.  We already knew that.  but there were very rare occurrences where the spike protein of the Coronavirus could create this Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in Children. It's a known side effect of the vaccine.  The FDA knew it.  by definition, if you look up the Mayo Clinic's definition of what Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in Children, it is a severe inflammation of multiple organs in the body, including the brain, the kidneys, the spleen, the gastrointestinal tract, the eyes, the skin.  This is all part of that.  If you look up complications on their definition of this actual syndrome, it can be deadly.  Now, in VAERS, I have not seen a single one of these reported into VAERS, but if you go to CDC.gov.com, there are already reports recorded since the shots have started.  There have already been 4,200 cases reported to the CDC of occurrences of Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in Children, and already over 40 deaths of children, reported to the CDC.  [Ardis does not touch on the fact that since June 2020, scores of cases of Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in adults, MIS-A, in adults have also been reported.  Oh, God.]  And this is what you want to push on all the masses of children in America and across the world to allow them to go to school?  I find this atrocious and disgusting.  And everyone needs to know that this is a known side-effect because the mRNA, and the spike protein in the shots or anything else that might be in those shots, are going to cause this debilitating, horrible reaction of inflammation in multiple organs at one time in the body of children.  There have been trials by, like Stanford.  Stanford has been setting up a study to allow vaccination of 6-month-olds, 2-year-olds, so you're seeing some of these being given to children, pushed out to children.  So these have actually already started to be corresponded (meaning that they're being recorded and evaluated?).

TRANSMISSION

44:00  Also, you're going to see what Wolfgang can talk about: transmission, shedding from the vaccinated parents to their children.  Oh, God.  You're seeing reports that all MIS-C started spiking.  You can actually look on CDCgov, the spike for MIS-C starts in December 2020, spikes in January, and continues to go up.  The chart below is a 7-day moving average.   

Children, toddlers, babies being vaccinated?  Oh, yeah, there are reports of 2-year-olds having menstruating blood clots after an hour of their parents being vaccinated?  This is already being reported in 2-year-old, 4-year-old, 6-year-old daughters.  In girls, this is the attempt in those female bodies to remove the toxic effects they're being exposed to by their vaccinated parents, or whom ever they're around.  

45:15  I call it transmission, you call it shedding, but when you put in 50 billion particles of mRNA, you're going to get 50 billion spike proteins.  You're going to get more than that in antibodies.  And the human body is going to start to shed these things.  You're going to transmit it through coughing, through sweating, through urine, through semen.  You have to excrete it out of your body, this is not healthy; it's an overabundance of immune reactions.  So the body is going to try to shed the spike proteins, it's going to try to shed the antibodies.  We already know how detrimental these antibodies are.  The antibodies themselves have already been proven with the Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca shot, those actual antibodies against double-stranded DNA, which is what is in those shots--the transgenes--we already know they cause Systemic lupus erythematosus, which I referenced earlier.  You're going to see auto-immune diseases come from the shots.  You're going to see the shedding of antibodies and spike proteins in other people.  It's just a horrible thing.  They knew this was going to happen.  It's in the FDA documents, and the FDA logo is on every slide.  These side-effects are permanent and lifelong?  

48:00  When we came out in October of 2020 with the FDA document myocarditis was listed as one of the known side effects.  Now, what are you hearing reported by all the teenagers that are now being given the shots?  You're hearing hundreds of thousands of reports of myocardidits.  And some of these athletes and teenagers are dying in high schools, high school ages.  But the FDA already knew this.  What's incredible to me is that the FDA said this week, "Because of the concerns about myocarditis in children before they start putting this into all children in America, we want Pfizer literally to expand how many children they put in the trial.  Why would you want to give any more children a shot that is causing myocarditis, whether it's in a trial of any kind or to the masses?  Why would you encourage any more children, or risk their life for health, over an experimental shot?  

49:40  Also, all pregnant women need to beware--there is polyethylene glycol 2000 in the Pfizer and Moderna shots; there's polysorbate 80 in the Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca shots; there's graphene oxide that's been determined to be inside of the Pfizer shot.  If you're pregnant with a female baby, there are two trimesters in which the female body's ovaries, inside your baby, will be creating all the eggs it will ever have for its whole life.  Infertility that's going to be coming from this is not in this generation--your babies are going to be born unable to have children of their own.  So you're going to have babies; they're going to come out looking normal, and when they turn 18, 19, 20-years-old, they're not going to have any eggs to actually get pregnant with because these chemicals in these shots are known to be toxic to the developing eggs inside the ovaries of the developing females.  So you're going to look back and say, "You know what--that shot didn't cause any harm to my child.  I got the vaccines when I was pregnant with you.  At 10-years-old, you're fine; at 20-years-old, you're fine; and then you go to get pregnant and try to have children, you never will be able to.  This is a great attempt to try to sterilize and infertilize the world, it appears.  Every pregnant woman should be warned that they should never take these shots.  Outside of the miscarriages that are being reported within days of the shots, think about the baby inside.   

51:38  Two things should be disturbing to people, I think, especially in America.  We've been raised to trust this one agency to do its due diligence, to approve things to be safe and effective medically.  That's called the FDA.  They do this FDA approval process.  Why in the world has any American been okay with the fact that they mandated, the NIH didn't, Anthony Fauci didn't, a never FDA-approved to be the only treatment for COVID?  It has been FDA-approved in October only after they already killed 500,000 Americans.  But it was never FDA approved when the pandemic started because the Ebola study proved that it was not safe and effective, and the FDA was not going to approve it.  Why then the next step--a vaccine that's never been tried on humans before.  And it's never been FDA-approved.  Why in the world did we drop all common sense and respect for what we thought was an agency that was doing some kind of review on medical devices and drugs to determine if they were safe and effective?  Why didn't we just throw that out the window and just trust you to just throw anything you want at us?  They've used every cultic tactic that they could think of through the media.  53:00