SASHA LATYPOVA: Injection of something and ingestion of the same thing are vastly different in terms of safety

This is basic medicine. Any medication given as an injection is significantly more potent than one given by mouth. https://t.co/ZSsNz2dSqV

— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) December 20, 2024

MAHA lives or dies based on understanding this single truth: injections ("vaccines") are the cause of the chronic disease epidemic. Food is a—very distant—secondary concern. "Injection of something and ingestion of the same thing are vastly different in terms of safety." Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Iron Will (@IronWillRpt) how ingesting proteins or toxins is "vastly different" than injecting proteins or toxins in terms of safety. Latypova, referencing the work of 1913 Nobel Prize–winner Charles Richet, notes that this is why it is of paramount importance to stop "vaccinating" people if we wish to stop the chronic disease epidemic.
"Everybody must understand, and this is also not taught in medical schools usually...that injection of something and ingestion of the same thing are vastly different in terms of safety," Latypova says. She notes that "it's not necessary to have toxins injected. You can inject things that are considered safe to eat, such as...regular food proteins—[like] milk, soy, corn, gelatin, [or] casein, which is a milk product," and still cause a negative, or even deadly, reaction. Latypova notes that GRAS—or substances that are "generally regarded as safe"—including the aforementioned proteins are now "used both in food and in...vaccines." Latypova notes the following as an illustrative example: "You can ingest snake poison. You can ingest trace amounts of metals, and it's not a big problem. Your body will reassemble these proteins or just pass through the toxins through your liver and kidneys, and you will get rid of them. This happens with all proteins that we consume. [But] if you inject raw organic milk into somebody's bloodstream, you can kill them with anaphylaxis immediately, or you can set off a lifelong allergy, which is lactose intolerance." Latypova goes on to note that allergies are "not benign." She adds, "Food allergies especially are hard to detect, [and] it takes decades to realize what you're allergic to. Over time, they destroy your digestive tract. They cause dysbiosis, meaning the replacement of beneficial bacteria with some other species or just a complete die-off. And that sets off, downstream, all kinds of other issues such as metabolic problems, obesity, diabetes, and cancers, because your gut creates neurotransmitters. [Other problems include] all sorts[, like] Alzheimer's, dementia, Parkinson's, all those neurodegenerative diseases. They're also related to the gut and destruction of your gut." "On top of [that]," Latypova says, "vaccinations continue, so people keep getting more and more vaccines. So if maybe the first few didn't do it, eventually, something will do it. So it's like a Russian roulette. And so now we have this chronic epidemic of obesity, diabetes, heart conditions, neurodegenerative cancers, even in younger people. And when it's so explosive in younger people, it's all vaccination related.

"So that's why it's so important to learn about Charles Richet, about his work, and that's why I wrote this article so that people can understand what's going on and stop vaccinating." 

TRUTH SEEKER: Palantir aired this commercial during the Army vs Navy game showing drones being released from a ship..... Further proof this is all a psyop...

Told ya. This is the naval drone weapons platform they are testing right now over NJ and NY. https://t.co/pBGnof3wZ8

— HealthRanger (@HealthRanger) December 16, 2024

MAHEK MISHRA: Yes, colostrum contains a higher concentration of vitamin K then mature milk, making it an important source during the newborn phase. Vitamin K is essential for blood clotting and preventing bleeding disorders in newborns who naturally have low vitamin K levels at birth

So give your baby colostrum, not a vitamin K vaccine.  Taking shortcuts can destroy your baby's life for the rest of his life. 

Is There Vitamin K In Colostrum? Here’s What You Need To Know! @ChildrensHD https://t.co/qwCYX4tmSc pic.twitter.com/gLRfaLAOvV

— Mary Holland (@maryhollandnyc) December 11, 2024

BABIES ARE BORN WITH LOW VITAMIN K FOR A REASON

At birth, cord blood is full of stem cells that go to any damaged sites in the baby where any trauma may have happened during birth.  If babies had high levels of vitamin K at birth, the cord blood wouldn't reach these necessary areas. 

This is one of the reasons why delayed cord clamping is so important!

Additionally colostrum contains higher concentrations of vitamin K than mature breast milk.  This isn't a mistake or coincidence; it's part of the body's natural design!

Is There Vitamin K in Colostrum? Here's What You need to Know," by Mahek Mishra. 

Yes, colostrum contains vitamin K, an essential nutrient that plays a crucial role in blood clotting and preventing bleeding disorders in newborns. The concentration of vitamin K in colostrum is higher than in mature milk, making it a significant source of this vitamin during the early days of a newborn’s life.

DR. JANE RUBY: The cockroach sued me and @AmericanMD for $25 million in a fake defamation case that got tossed by a federal judge is now going after Katherine Watt & @sasha_latypova for establishing evidence that the Covid shots were

.@RWMaloneMD TRIES TO DAMAGE GOOD PEOPLE AND HIDE THE TRUTH

The cockroach sued me and @AmericanMD for $25 million in a fake defamation case that got tossed by a federal judge is now going after Katherine Watt & @sasha_latypova for establishing evidence that the Covid shots were… pic.twitter.com/VNsgNjJvfQ

— DR JANE RUBY™️ (@RealDrJaneRuby) December 10, 2024

THERESA M. LONG, MD: The JAG at the Pentagon was ensuring that . . . accountability for the murder and destruction of our national defense via the vax fell on lower level

from Theresa M. Long, MD,

Where to start here....when a JAG attorney confronted a senior JAG at the Pentagon about Frago 5...in which the responsibility was pushed to commanders to ensure there were enough "FDA approved vaccines" for all servicemembers, the Pentagon senior leaders knew NO FDA-approved vaccines were ever going to be available. The JAG at the Pentagon was ensuring that . . . accountability for the murder and destruction of our national defense via the vax fell on lower level

Don’t forget that VADM Chris French was the Legal Counsel to the fmr Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley. pic.twitter.com/Zn1G8hFRHb

— Rob Green (@RobGreen1010) December 7, 2024

from Rob Green,

Sources within the Pentagon report that VADM Chris French, the Navy’s Judge Advocate General, has submitted his resignation to

@SECNAV

, Carlos Del Toro, and that the SECNAV has already accepted his resignation. This comes only 92 days after taking command from now-retired Vice Admiral Darse Crandall. VADM French was one of the driving forces behind Navy COVID policy and the legal defense of Trident Order #12 which was declared unlawful by a federal court in Texas in 2022. 

It is also reported that VADM French engaged in other conduct unbecoming and may be the subject of future investigations. 

SASHA LATYPOVA on UNITED HEALTHCARE CEO BRIAN THOMPSON'S MURDER: My speculation on this is he was either going to testify or was compelled to testify as part of this, and it was going to bring down some very powerful individuals who are behind his company

(2/6) In May of this year, UnitedHealthcare Group CEO Andrew Witty testified before Congress regarding the ransomeware attack. Change Healthcare, the hacked division of UNH, processes $1.5 TRILLION in medical claims annually.

Witty—the CEO of the company that had revenues of… pic.twitter.com/700HrmbbCP

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) December 6, 2024

"My speculation on [UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson's murder] is he was either going to testify or was compelled to testify as part of [an ongoing DOJ investigation], and it was going to bring down some very powerful individuals who are behind his company." (1/6) Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) speculates on a recent episode of The Shannon Joy Show (

@ShannonJoyRadio

) as to the real reason UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was recently murdered. Highlighting a gargantuan ransomware attack that targeted the health insurance and benefits corporation—which is a subsidiary of UnitedHealthcare Group—earlier this year, Latypova notes that "there's ongoing...litigation about that," which has already cost the company "several billion dollars"—not including whatever forthcoming settlement there may be. "[Thompson's] the CEO of the company that processes most of the Medicare and Medicaid claims, all kinds of insurance claims, in the United States," Latypova notes. "About a year ago, there was a breach of data. They got hijacked, ransomware. They had to pay a ransomware bribe and that also went sideways. There was a data breach exposed, about a hundred million Americans [had] their healthcare data, their Social Security numbers [exposed]. And so there's litigation ongoing about that. They already spent several billion dollars on that litigation, and that's before even the settlement." Latypova goes on to say that UnitedHealthcare is "also under investigation by the Department of Justice, which [is] also looking into all of this. And so [Thompson] was meeting with the investors, walked out in the morning, and then was gunned down right after that." The pharma insider adds, "My speculation on this is he was either going to testify or was compelled to testify as part of this, and it was going to bring down some very powerful individuals who are behind his company."

"Because it's such a huge company, such huge data that they're processing, they have to be connected to the same cabal...that's running this whole global thing," Latypova adds, referencing the ongoing global COVID operation (my term). 

SASHA LATYPOVA: the federal and most of the state governments are captured. Whatever is running the federal gov agencies really intends to kill you, or at least substantially injure you, damage your reproductive capacity and repossess your assets in the process.

Overall characterization of what is going on: the federal and most of the state governments are captured. Whatever is running the federal gov agencies really intends to kill you, or at least substantially injure you, damage your reproductive capacity and repossess your assets in the process. The aim is to reduce the population and terrorize the survivors enough to establish a totalitarian control over much of the world’s territory. Nobody is coming to save you, your survival and that of your children is in your hands only. Do not comply.” --Sasha Latypova, 2021

90-minute interview.

Kash Patel was working at the NSA at the time of the lockdowns, the agency responsible for the military lockdown.

10:50. As far as this whole global military operation, it didn't change; it continues, and it continues because there is very little recognition besides myself you and a couple of other small commentators in this space.  None of us went on Tucker Carlson or Joe Rogan podcasts.  It was only the suppressed and banned freedom leaders that go on Tucker. 

11:35. Very few people like myself and Katherine and you and a few other journalists less than 10 people who have ever picked up this message and looked at it seriously and found the evidence recently I shared with you this article by Debbie Lerman who's a journalist who writes for Brownstone and has her own sub stack.  She wrote this article I provided some information for her and we're going to continue collaborating on this we just provided additional evidence that the military operation was run not just in the United States but also in European countries Germany and the Netherlands there is very open evidence even the minister of health and the Netherlands admitted that all these mRNA shots were NATO commitments.  So the purchase of the shots were NATO commitments.  Do you know what NATO commitments mean?  It means it's weapons because all the NATO Allied countries are committed to buying standardized weapons from the same military contractors and military suppliers.  That's what the Joint Defense Alliance means, and so the shots, the MRNA shots, are weapons just as I've written about the last two years.  I pointed to the contracts, to the DOD contracts, how they were ordered, funded through Operation Warp Speed, OWS, [thanks, Donald Trump], and I said clearly this shows that these are weapons; these are not medicines. 

13:13.  Can we talk about that revelation that you primarily broke.  It was your interview with RFK, Jr over 2 years ago with your evidence.  And I think you worked with Katherine Watts on that project, and Sasha found the government documentation, the orders, the documents that determine that the shots were countermeasures and that the deployment of lockdown, the determination of non-essential and essential workers, the protocols, and of course, Operation Warp Speed, the creation of the deadly the deadly mRNA technology, was a military operation.  This was confirmed actually in Brooke Jackson's case, when it was dismissed.  Essentially, the reason it was dismissed was because Pfizer came back and said, "Hey, listen, it's not us.  We didn't commit any fraud.  We just delivered fraud that the government ordered, that the military ordered from us," and the judge was like, okay.  

ALEKSANDAR SVETSKI: The opposite of excellence is not ‘bad’, but average.

Bullseye, again! Collectivist ideologies are designed to perpetuate the average. That’s why I am weary of the unironic use of the word “humanity”. There is no humanity, there are individual humans who must strive to improve themselves, to get away from the cancer of average.

- Sasha Latypova

Read on Substack

from "The Cancer of Average," 

The opposite of excellence is not ‘bad’, but average. This is one of the key distinctions that makes modern civilian and martial collectives so fundamentally different. Collectivist ideologies such as socialism, communism and of course, the most insidious, democracy, are all the politics of “average”. They encourage people to trade excellence and personal potential for a ‘share in a faceless whole’ in which they are merely cogs.  

SASHA LATYPOVA: somebody starts having respiratory illness around you, usually it's seasonal, and there's very, very good data showing how it's correlated with sunlight.

"I see a lot of evidence that...seasonal respiratory illness didn't exist until they started mass vaccinating in the first place...So it is associated with people's immune systems beings attacked via injections."

Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova)… pic.twitter.com/7oqkXNflOM

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) November 10, 2024

What the narrative of mythology wants you to believe is that from just minor casual contact with somebody, some aerosol droplets flying around, you can get infected and have this deadly disease. That's total nonsense," Latypova says. She adds that "It's very hard to infect people by inhalation or ingestion or skin contact. It's very hard because we have so many defenses in our bodies that reject non-self biology, non-self biological matter."

01:22  Also, it's very hard to infect people by inhalation, ingestion, or skin contact because we have so many defenses in our bodies that reject non-self biology, non-self biological matter.  So if you inhale something, your area of exposure is very very small, it's just here, nose and mouth, and there's mucosal defenses, numerous layers of mucosal defenses.  By the time anything gets to your bloodstream if at all, probably won't get to the bloodstream, but by the time something gets there it's very small.  It's been denatured and it's been kind of weakened by your own [immune] system. That's why all of these biological weapons activities have been going on for quite some time.  They've never been able to create something that self-spreads.  So nothing spreading . . . they can't even demonstrate spreading between animals in a cage.

02:20  Based on all that, take me one step further, what do you attribute what appears to be seasonal colds or flus that run through geographic reasons or whatever, seasonal come and go, are people producing a lot of this toxic, you know, their bodies getting rid of toxic stuff, so those around them get affected by the toxic shedding . . . am I close?  

02:52  There's something to it.  I can't say that I've figured it all out.  I see a lot of evidence that, first of all, seasonal respiratory illness didn't exist until they started mass vaccinating in the first place.  So it is associated with people's immune systems being attacked via injections because as I said, by inhalation it's hard to get somebody infected.  Now, seasonal, if you're not vaccinated, but a bunch of people around you are . . . or somebody starts having respiratory illness around you, usually it's seasonal, and there's very, very good data showing how it's correlated with sunlight.  So, yes, the lack of sunlight in the winter, in the northern hemisphere is almost a perfect correlation with the seasonality of these respiratory illnesses, or . . . .  So there's something to it.  We have less vitamin D in our bodies and at the same time with these mass vaccination campaigns, people start shedding these byproducts, and there are mechanisms by which we coordinate in close proximity.  For example, there is a very well-known phenomenon that nobody can explain by the way in biology, of women living in the same household will synchronize their periods.

04:24  Yeah, there are a lot of different reasons for this but what you've laid out is that it makes it really important for us to shut down mRNA production . . .

Always best to consume animal-sourced foods and vitamins, mainly for greater absorption.

COUNTRY LIFE Vitamin D3 10000 IU, 60 CT https://t.co/6ZTsA7P8pq via @amazon

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) November 10, 2024

SASHA LATYPOVA: GOOD NEWS! Blue Cross employee who was fired for refusing COVID-19 shots based on religious beliefs has prevailed in court with a $12M awarded by the jury.

Here's the report, "Michigan Jury Awards Millions to a Woman Fired After Refusing to Get a COVID-19 Vaccine," Ed White, APNews, November 8, 2024.  Vaccine is the wrong word, but the media is in line, lock, stock, and barrel, with the big pharma's language.  Think of it as going to Starbucks and you want to order a medium cup of coffee.  No, no, dear patron: it's called a "grande."

from Sasha Latypova. 

Good news!  A Blue Cross employee who was fired for refusing COVID-19 shots based on religious beliefs has prevailed in court with a $12M awarded by the jury. 

“DETROIT (AP) — A jury awarded more than $12 million Friday to a woman who lost her job at a Michigan insurance company after declining to get an apnews.com/article/flu-…

Much of the award — $10 million — is for punitive damages against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, according to the verdict form. 

Lisa Domski, who worked at Blue Cross for more than 30 years, said she was a victim of religious discrimination.  The company in 2021 did not grant an exemption from its vaccine policy, despite her insistence that it clashed with her Catholic beliefs. 

Domski's attorney, Jon Marko, said she worked 100% remotely as an IT specialist during the pandemic; 75% before COVID-19 hit in 2020. 

Even without the vaccine, "she wasn't a danger to anybody,” Marko said in an interview after the trial. 

Besides punitive damages, the jury in Detroit federal court awarded Domski about $1.7 million in lost pay and $1 million in noneconomic damages. 

Blue Cross denied any discrimination. In a court filing earlier in the case, the insurer said Domski lacked a sincerely held religious belief.

LAURA DEMARAY: We had a small but mighty win yesterday together in Caldwell, Idaho.

A team of expert and compassionate doctors and scientists whose names may be familiar — Ryan Cole, Peter McCullough, Renata Moon, David Wiseman, Christina Parks, James Thorp, and John Tribble — met with the Idaho Southwest District Health Board on 10/22/24 (7 members representing 6 counties in Idaho). The big names were backed by a medical freedom team who worked so hard to make this meeting come together and end with an amazing outcome.

Timestamps:

2:25 meeting start

3:58-30:58 Perry Jansen, MD

31:15-41:36 John Tribble, MD

41:57-46:48 Christina Parks, MD

47:00-1:03:35 Ryan Cole, MD

1:04:00-1:08:10 Peter McCullough, MD

1:08:30-1:14:20 James Thorp, MD

1:14:50-1:31:06 David Wiseman, PhD

1:32:25-1:37:36 Renata Moon, MD

1:37:56-1:42:55 Perry Jansen, MD

1:42:55-1:46:22 John Tribble, MD

1:47:00-2:07:15 Board discussion

2:07:15-2:08:08 Vote

They are starting to open Covid-19 vaccination clinics again. 💉 DON'T BE A SLAVE.

They are starting to open Covid-19 vaccination clinics again. 💉

This victim went to the pop-up clinic in the mall, received his shot, then collapsed to the floor.   https://t.co/MfYxVTAowH  https://t.co/aP3LIjMRlj https://t.co/tib3tLCtaJ pic.twitter.com/KqFKs1TDWE

— “Sudden And Unexpected” (@toobaffled) October 18, 2024

RAMESE SANDERS: In 1976 in Bogota, Columbia medical doctors went on strike for 52 days, with only emergency care available. The death rate dropped by 35%.

In 1976 in Bogota, Columbia medical doctors went on strike for 52 days, with only emergency care available. The death rate dropped by 35%.

It wasn’t just in Columbia either. In the same year, a similar doctors' strike in Los Angeles County resulted in an 18% drop in mortality.…

— Ramese Sanders (@RameseSanders) October 15, 2024

Thank you to Sasha Latypova.   

SASHA LATYPOVA: And, in summary, I can say none of it is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates [the vaccines], and that's been the case since forever...

"None of it [vaccines] is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates these things, and that's been the case since forever...up until 1973 there were no regulations and no standards for manufacturing...[then] in '86 there was [The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act]."… pic.twitter.com/iqX6py1O3a

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) October 9, 2024

"None of it [vaccines] is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates these things, and that's been the case since forever...up until 1973 there were no regulations and no standards for manufacturing...[then] in '86 there was [The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act]." Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Dr. Drew (

@drdrew

) how "vaccines" are not actually regulated in the U.S. by the FDA but rather only "pretend regulated." The pharma insider notes that the injections were entirely unregulated prior to 1973, and then, by 1986, protected by The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act—meaning there's no liability and thus, in effect, still no regulations. "My colleague, Katherine [Watt], traced the relevant US law all the way back to late 1700s. And so, we now have a better understanding of the regulatory frameworks in the US as it applies to all vaccines in general, and then, a much greater understanding about the COVID shots, which are EUA countermeasures and how that's regulated," Latypova says. "And...in summary, I can say none of it is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates these things, and that's been the case since forever..." "In the US, the vaccines have not been under FDA mandate until 1973," Latypova adds. "Many people don't realize that. They were not regulated at all as pharmaceuticals. They were manufactured essentially by public health service, which is predecessor of CDC, the US government, public health service." "After 1973, they technically came under FDA purview. And as you know, in '86, there was [The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and] that shielded all the manufacturers from liability; that was under Reagan." "Since then, the manufacturers of vaccines [have] had no liability. And if you have no liability for injuries or deaths that you cause, then it's as if regulations don't exist for you because you have no consequences," Latypova notes. Partial transcription of clip: "So the manufacturing, those remain great concerns. In fact, I've I've gotten additional information that it's even worse, than I thought, and the problem actually goes a long time back. Even my colleague, Katherine [Watt], traced the relevant US law all the way back to late 1700s. And so, we now have a better understanding of the regulatory frameworks in the US, as it applies to vaccines, all vaccines in general, and then, a much greater understanding, about the COVID shots, which are EUA countermeasures and how that's regulated. And...in summary, I can say none of it is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates these things, and that's been the case since forever... "So the law research is ongoing, and, Katherine and one of the colleagues are writing a big report on relevant law tracing back to, as I said, late 1700s when, you know, vaccination as we kind of know it in a modern world has, started being used more or less in mass subjects. Now, in the US, the vaccines have not been under FDA mandate until 1973. Many people don't realize that. They were not regulated at all as pharmaceuticals. They were manufactured essentially by public health service, which is predecessor of CDC, the US government, public health service. And, they were sort of, you know, you could order order the samples or whatever you needed, the box. You could even, like, order it in the mail from the US government, and they would send it to you. "And so up until 1973, there were no regulation and no standards for manufacturing, for purity testing, for contaminants, for, characterizing what you have made in the pharmaceutical process, which is standard for anybody who works in pharma making drugs. That didn't exist, really. It wasn't anything codified. After 1973, they technically came under FDA purview. And as you know, in '86, there was a national vaccine, I forget the correct name of the law, but basically, the act that came in that, shielded all the manufacturers from liability that was under Reagan. "And since then, the manufacturers of vaccines had no liability. And if you have no liability, for injuries or deaths that you cause, then it's as if regulations don't exist for you because you have no consequences."

BREAKING: Tina Peters, the gold star mom and former clerk of Mesa County, Colorado, has just been sentenced to 9 years in prison by a corrupt judge for preserving records on the Dominion voting machines before they could delete everything

Thank you to Sasha Latypova. 

BREAKING: Tina Peters, the gold star mom and former clerk of Mesa County, Colorado, has just been sentenced to 9 years in prison by a corrupt judge for preserving records on the Dominion voting machines before they could delete everything

This is in the same state that loves… pic.twitter.com/iy7vOMJ37l

— George (@BehizyTweets) October 3, 2024

SASHA LATYPOVA: Once you're protected from any liability, it's as if regulations don't exist for you because you don't have liability

one nanogram of DNA in a vaccine can cause cancer.  --Dr. Andrew Lewis

What is the FDA regulatory limit?  10 nanograms.  --Sasha Latypova

"Vaccines are not regulated at all. They're fake regulated...[the FDA says] even 1 nanogram of DNA in a vaccine can cause cancer. What is the FDA regulatory limit? 10 nanograms...[in the] COVID vaccines [there are] 2,000 nanograms...it's all intentional."

Retired pharma R&D… pic.twitter.com/BPDhcEKDD3

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) October 3, 2024

Vaccines are not regulated at all. They are fake regulated.  

As a result of the 1986 Act that President Reagan signed they no longer have any liability.

Well, starting there.  So the reason that Act went into place was because up until 1973 they were not regulated at all.  They were not even under FDA mandate, they were just cooked up by CDC these poisons.  That's what I'm saying, it's all intentional and it's been going on since like 200 years ago.  The CDC, a private corporation, was cooking them, up forcing them on everyone, and privatizing the returns.  In 1973, they came under FDA regulation mandate.  In about 5 years, I don't know how long it takes to put a new law in place, but let's say in about 5 years they realize, "Uh-oh.  If we have to comply with these things, it's not going to work."  So they introduce this law to protect themselves from liability.  Once you're protected from any liability, it's as if regulations don't exist for you because you don't have liability.  And then proceeded to remove systematically remove requirements that existed on the drug side for the vaccine side.  So nobody actually tests them for anything.  For example, we uncovered an office, an office on the FDA web page, it says it's headed by Dr. Andrew Lewis, who is by our estimates at least 90 years old if he is alive.  But he is the head of this office, fake head, the office when you read the description of what they do they found that even one nanogram of DNA in a vaccine can cause cancer.  What is the FDA regulatory limit?  10 nanograms.  So, the FDA says that it's okay for you to have 10 times more material injected that we know causes cancer because . . . reasons.  Now, what, in fact, was found in COVID-19 vaccines by Kevin McKernan and his colleagues is up to 2000 nanograms, so 200 times over the regulatory limit is being injected into Pfizer jabs and has been for years now.  And all the regulators actually know about it this because everybody's been notified.  The Epoch Times interviewed them even, and they all said, "Yes, we know, and it's not a problem.  Continue injecting."  You tell me this is not intentional.

It's too big to bust because what they need is to have some [privacy?].

Every normal person listening to me is saying, "I know lady what you're saying.  I know you're not crazy, but this is just not possible.  I can't imagine the evil this big."

The origins of the nanotechnology narrative. by Sasha Latypova

Repetitive messaging is the only technology ever needed for mind control. Seductive sci-fi narratives are a particularly insidious version of this "technology".

Read on Substack

Debbie Lehrman's comment was very good, 

Thank you Sasha for this excellent overview of what I would describe as a "mass psychosis" phenomenon, akin to the condition we witnessed during Covid, and for the same reason: fear of death. It's all the same, whether you believe you can insert "code" into human cells that will make them do something you want them to do without bad side effects, or nonsensical ideas about loading one's "mind" (how do they even define that?) to the "cloud," and the nanobot-5G-chemtrails-internet-of-bodies thing that I can never get anyone to actually explain to me (how does it work? what are the mechanisms? what is the science? no answer!). In my experience, a lot of it has to do with little to no education in/understanding of biology, chemistry, physics nor any exploration of philosophy, literature, religion, etc.  I also agree that it seems like the vehemence with which this nonsense is being promoted on both sides (globalists vs the rest of us) feels like a psy-op. But I do not discount the mass formation tendencies we witnessed during Covid.

 

If there isn't enough evidence and information surrounding the dangers and illegalities of not just the code injection but all injections that are falsely called vaccines it may be important to take a new look at the term anaphylaxis a term normally reserved for a serious allergic reaction that has a rapid onset and is life-threatening and requires immediate medical attention, or so we've been told.  But hold on.  In reviewing the work of 1913 Nobel Prize winner, Charles Richet, biotech expert and analyst, Sasha Latypova, and legal expert Katherine Watt have a broader take on this condition because they believe it may be at the center of what is injuring people and killing them in this mass genocide operation.  Let's take a closer look and welcome once again to the show Sasha Latypova.  

2:25. How did you and Katherine Watt get interested to even dig into this topic, and why do you think it's important right now?

2:30.  Katherine has been working on a very large project going back through vaccine-related laws of the United States all the way back to the 1700s, so she and another collaborator are writing what she calls "a beast of a" report on how all these laws and this entire framework have been put in place and specifically looking at definitions.  As you know, definitions are very important, like what is a vaccine?  What is a virus? etc, because definitions in law are basically everything.  So that work is ongoing, and as part of this work, she came across Richet's Nobel Prize and she sent me originally his Nobel Prize acceptance speech, a lecture, which I read and I was shocked by it.  And then I decided to research it further, and I actually went into the archives and I found his book that he published in 1913, he published his book, and I provided several screenshots from it on my sub stack when I wrote about this so I read his book and I kind of understand what he did and the conclusions that he made he also sites other authors working on the same area at the same time.

4:00. Who was this guy was he a scientist was he a money guy Charles Richet?

4:07. Yeah at the turn of the 20th century I would classify him as a sort of there were a lot of these gentleman scientists so people who had independent financial means and they were interested in different topics of science so he seemed to have been very well connected of the original story says that the Prince of Monaco invited him on his yacht which was a huge ship that was traveling in the Mediterranean and he went to research the jellyfish, the Man of War, the very dangerous jellyfish and so from then on when they returned he started working with different poisons that he made from similar things so getting them out of War was kind of difficult so he created what he himself called virus of Actinaria.  Turns out, the virus of Actinaria is basically the tentacles of a sea anemone dissolved in glycerine.  At that time, the definition of "virus" was poison.  So he made poison, and he described how he made it, and he called it a virus, which was the scientific nomenclature at the time and this whole methodology this particle that infects and flies around and you get it from casual contact.  That wasn't there.  It was already well understood that that doesn't happen, and viruses are something you inject to poison.  That's what he was doing in his laboratory experiments he mostly worked on dogs he poisoned a lot of dogs and other people that he collaborated with or knew about who worked with rodents, rabbits, guinea pigs, and sometimes other animals. Turns out white mice and some breeds of rats do not experience anaphylaxis.  Isn't it surprising that they are the staple of pharmaceutical research?

6:10. You also mentioned that he was at that turn of the century the group of eugenicists, he wasn't doing this to help mankind, or did he find out I guess, did anybody have success stories in terms of health so that those mice, the animals that do not experience that abrupt serious allergic reaction, why?  Do they have something that we don't have?

6:40. They did not know.  I think they just figured out that these breeds don't experience anaphylaxis, and said, well, we're not going to work with them because we are interested in the anaphylaxis.  In addition to his interest in anaphylaxis and vaccination or early attempts at vaccination, he was a committed eugenicist.  He thought that black people were inferior, and he was actually a president of a Eugenics Society in Europe, I think in France.  At that time, eugenics was a fashionable conservative position in high society, so almost everybody, if you read the literature which I do from the early 20th century, you will see that high society, well-to-do social economic classes are all eugenicists and this is acceptable; it's considered a proper conservative point of view.

7:38. I agree with you I've been inspired by the work of Scott Shara who's done a whole bunch of work originally to avenge his daughter's Grace's hospital murder.  But he ends up stumbling and digging into finding that this was all part of the greater eugenicist movement.  It was a very proper thing to do.  You wanted a healthier race.  People just missed that whole, they fell into it, the masses, thinking that it was going to be something good for them.  

8:10. Right it's a little bit of a digression but it's important to understand this stems from Darwinism by the way and there was a lot of scientific debate at the time it wasn't a centrally so the concern of these rich people was how do we prevent these poor classes that were dirty and inferior from overbreeding.  That was their main concern and actually, Darwin was against that not because he was some humanitarian his position was that if we prevent them from over-breeding then we don't have the competitive evolutionary selection if you read the literature at that time it's really fascinating but it shows where these ideas come from yes it came from the richer classes the more well-to-do classes, who called themselves "well-bred" from trying to limit and prevent over breeding of poor classes, which they associated with infectious diseases, epidemics, general dirty stuff, crime, that was their attempt to limit it.  So they devised all these methods and Richet was working in it although in the book at least he doesn't say explicitly his goals, he just lays out the scientific stuff.  I think they were working on how they can figure out how, we can prevent epidemics and limit the reproduction of the dirty classes.

1964, Merck produced Adjuvant 65 that contained 65% peanut oil plus Arlasel A, aluminum stearate. Beginning in the 1970s, INJECTING peanut oil became common in vaccines

“History, Stephen said, is a nightmare from which I am trying to awake.”  James Joyce, Ulysses

☝️Vaccines are 100% responsible for all food allergies. Anaphylactic state is created by injecting common proteins, such as derived from peanuts, wheat, soy, corn, etc. In majority of cases it's not a shock, but slow-burning allergy that makes all food containing these proteins…

— sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" (@sasha_latypova) September 8, 2024

Dr. Wakefield on the Mumps vaccine

Dr. Wakefield on the Mumps vaccine. pic.twitter.com/7EgtyFlO3u

— Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪 (@catsscareme2021) September 4, 2024

Another example is mumps.  Let's take mumps.  The mumps vaccine does not work.  So what we are seeing is outbreaks of mumps around the world in populations who've received two, three, four doses of the mumps vaccine.  The mumps vaccine does not work, and why it doesn't work is another issue that we can go into and how Merck acted to cover that up is an issue of current interest.  But we don't need to go into that for the moment.  Mumps was historically contracted at around the age of five to seven by children who then developed lifelong immunity.  Mumps in children is a trivial disease.  It's acknowledged to be a trivial disease, and indeed the CDC and the Department of Health in the UK determined there was no need for a mumps vaccine because it was so mild and its complications were not serious.  But nonetheless, for commercial reasons, I believe a mumps vaccine was foisted on to the population and has been made mandatory for many.  Now because the vaccine does not work in enough people or for long enough, then what we see is the re-emergence of mumps in older populations, in teenagers and college students and the problems arise because moms is a much more serious disease in, for example, post-pubertal males, where they can develop testicular inflammation, orchitis, and sterility.  So a mumps vaccine that doesn't work is not only a useless vaccine, it's a dangerous vaccine because it destroys natural herd immunity, that is the exposure of individuals when the disease is mild and displaces it up to a susceptibility to disease at a time when the disease is severe or more severe.  So not only have we destroyed natural herd immunity to the mumps with vaccination, we have made mumps a much more dangerous disease than it was historically.