Bravo! Now please call for the shots to be pulled as you can’t leave something like this on the market to be injected into children while you “investigate”. It’s not ethical. https://t.co/z6mJU0FwEt
— Dr. Janci (@JanciToxDoc) April 10, 2024
Shane Jett, Oklahoma Senator.
Former @pfizer Employee and Former @Project_Veritas undercover agent, @justintegrity_ whistle blows on BOTH organizations for Pfizer premeditated atrocities and PV withholding life-saving information and millions of babies and children could have been spared this dangerous… pic.twitter.com/CWS1zVSPvI
— DR JANE RUBY (@RealDrJaneRuby) March 30, 2024
Here is Leslie's documentary, Project Whistleblower. Wow!
Pfizer makes Midazolam?! https://t.co/mUFFB1b46x
— Amazing Polly Isn't Here to Compromise (@FringeViews) February 13, 2024
You should know by now that when hospitals and doctors prescribe or give you Midazolam, they're preparing you for that lane to the great beyond.
Y’all meet Peter Tontonoz, MD, PhD. He sold his myocarditis research data for $14M. Pfizer bought it and buried it! The DOJ was tipped off in 2022 by an auditor/whistleblower—he’s still waiting to hear back from them. https://t.co/yL5Pzx8tUa pic.twitter.com/0VD0t0VCoh
— Brook Jackson 💜 (@IamBrookJackson) October 24, 2023
See the Pfizer building in the background at the 00:31 mark. Unbelievable.
: Pro-Israel demonstrators call for genocide from the streets of New York City. pic.twitter.com/lVcxeHht2w
— The General (@GeneralMCNews) October 10, 2023
This is from the 1996 meningitis outbreak in Kano, Nigeria, which means that a lot of the adults seen in this 2009 news clip were children in 1996. I covered this last December 2022.
Oh, so Pfizer has your back. Whew, for a minute there I think Pfizer was using the DNA tests as a kind of indemnity. Thank God, we're working with such an ethical company. Funny that Pfizer invents "outbreaks," "pandemics," and "epidemics." That's their business model. In this case here in Nigeria, the "outbreak" was meningitis. Oh, wait, we've got a vaccine for that! We even have one for hangnails! Got a hangnail? We got you.
I don't know how anybody can trust any of these vaccine manufacturers.
From African Arguments,
In 2007, the Nigerian federal government and Kano State government filed criminal and civil suits against Pfizer and eight other defendants, asking for $7 billion in damages. The suit charged that the company had tested an unapproved and experimental drug on children with neither informed consent from parents nor approval from the Nigerian government. Pfizer countered that such approval wasn’t necessary. In 2001, had uncovered that a document Pfizer claimed to prove ethical approval by Nigerian authorities for the trial appeared to be falsified and back-dated.
11/200 children died, others had organ failure, brain damage, and paralysis 
.
Excuse me? This would be utterly monstrous. Pfizer would never do such a thing! Would they? https://t.co/d1EwVGAaFi
— Alex (Sasha) Krainer (@NakedHedgie) August 4, 2023
In the late 1970s, 11 babies died of SIDS in one area of Tennessee. They'd had the same vaccine from the same batch. You can argue whether the vaccine was the cause, but what's interesting is Wyeth's (now Pfizer) response. Call an emergency meeting with the scientists to determine if something had gone wrong with the batch and led to the deaths? Hell, no. Their response was to stop sending a single batch to a single area, instead splitting batches across the country, so no clusters like the Tennessee cluster could be noticed again. (If you think Pharma execs are more moral now than then ... well, enjoy that belief.)
In the late 1970s, 11 babies died of SIDS in one area of Tennessee. They'd had the same vaccine from the same batch. You can argue whether the vaccine was the cause, but what's interesting is Wyeth's (now Pfizer) response. Call an emergency meeting with the scientists to… pic.twitter.com/QKC1Co3LL5
— Tom Naughton (@TomDNaughton) July 5,
More on how the baby vaccines cause SIDS.
They specifically targetted pregnant women
— Dr Ahmad Malik (@DocAhmadMalik) June 21, 2023
One of many shocking revelations in this interview with Sasha Latypova - visit https://t.co/NbfwoOMeED to listen and find links to Spotify and Apple podcast - please RT pic.twitter.com/vlea2nkcG1
To summarize, are you telling me that these jobs these Covid vaccines when given to pregnant women you're giving them an experimental drug to the unborn child?
Yes.
This goes against medical ethics this goes against the Nuremberg code. We never experiment on children. We never experiment on pregnant women. We don't experiment on unborn children.
Yep. But the pregnant women and babies are the specific Target of these programs both of them Pfizer and Moderna. Advisor in Moderna I reviewed their contracts I reviewed their clinical packages, I know it for a fact. I can prove it in court. If we ever get into court. Nobody will ever get into court. And they both targeted the . . . and the contracts came from the Department. The Department of Defense specifically targeted pregnant women in these programs and specifically requested GLP compliance studies for the reproductive toxicity. So they wanted to make sure that data is reliable. Pfizer tested three versions of their product in the rat study and selected the one that increased the miscarriages the most.
14:35. It's like taking the most toxic chemotherapy that you can imagine and start pushing it on pregnant women and children the rest of the population.
The larger the molecule, the more unstable it is. mRNA is made up of 4,300
The correct defendants are named! Finally a case that does not bark up the “Pfizer-Pfizer-Pfizer” diversion tree, but goes for the head of the Monster via its important vital organ! The DOD and Austin (also Gen Perna who was formally COO of OWS) directed pharma to produce weapons whether the executives and underlings understood it or not is somewhat irrelevant, they were commandeered under the Defense Production Act. --Sasha Latypova
Lawsuit filed against the DOD by family of a 24 yo man killed by Pfizer-made-DOD designed, ordered, financed shot. Link in the tweet below. pic.twitter.com/g4dSoNV4ue
— sashalatypova.substack.com (@sasha_latypova) June 4, 2023
Latypova continues,
Ray Flores, the attorney filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the DOD and Lloyd Austin III in his official capacity as defense secretary.
The lawsuit alleges the DOD engaged in “willful misconduct” by continuing to exclusively allow distribution of the stockpiled version of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that had been authorized for emergency use even after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted full approval to a different vaccine, Comirnaty.
The complaint states that the DOD engaged in ‘bait and switch’ fraud,” misleading the public that Comirnaty “approval” meant that the Emergency Use authorized injections were the same and thus “safe and effective”. The vast majority of the public, including health professionals today to not understand the distinction and do not know that the injections administered to the public are still only EUA. No approved versions have been made available. Also, very few people realize that both EUA and BLA versions are “countermeasures”.
The DOD did this despite being fully aware that drugs granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) cannot legally be marketed as “safe and effective” because the FDA standard for EUA is only that drugs “may be effective.”
As a result, the lawsuit alleges, George Watts Jr. was misled into taking the investigational vaccine which lead to his death from myocarditis.
The victim’s family went through the “correct” process, applying to the Countermeasures compensation fund and not receiving a response. To date, the fund paid out a whopping $8K in 3 claims. There is an autopsy conclusion that the victim was indeed killed by the shots.
🚨MORE UPDATES: If I told you the court clerk refused to accept our Motions from Friday would you believe it? They did.
— Brook Jackson 💜 (@IamBrookJackson) May 2, 2023
Like that’s going to stop us! So we fired back w/another Motion to Appeal. Stay tuned. https://t.co/8Erb69jelO
6:02. We now know that Pfizer was secretly funding organizations to mandate their vaccine, their so-called vaccine, their drug. They were hiding their sourcing their support of it by funding organizations with other names.
Not only that. We now know that Pfizer was involved because the contract required that [the vaccine] could only be approved, and they could only receive it, if there was no available alternative because it took the PREP Act terms, the Emergency Use Authorization, EUA, terms and explicitly put them in the contract
Pfizer knew there were alternatives that worked. So, Pfizer was working behind the scenes to prevent anybody from knowing there were alternatives that worked, using their power in the big pharmaceutical industry to do so.
So we now know that this was a big massive fraud, but the FDA has never acknowledged that it was a fraud. The FDA is still saying it's, still saying it's effective, still saying it's a vaccine, still saying--a little bit less now--that it's for the prevention of COVID-19, and they're saying that they don't believe Brook Jackson's complaints. They're trusting Pfizer's lies. Well, in that case, we get to pursue our case. We only don't get to pursue our case if Pfizer says, if the FDA says "Oh, we know Pfizer's lying. We know it's dangerous. We know it's ineffective. We know it's not a vaccine." They've never said that. The judge got the law completely wrong. It was lazy judges by a lazy law clerk that were working for him or just ild fashion cowardice."
#Placentagate Pfizer claim that the mRNA vaccines were “Safe and Effective” in pregnancy is based on 44 french rats.. And the study was done by... 🥁
— Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News 🙌 (@unhealthytruth) March 22, 2023
-from WoofMelb pic.twitter.com/5MT6splXv5
Attorney Robert Barnes (@barnes_law): It's Time for Trump to Recognize He Was Lied to By Pfizer
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) March 6, 2023
The contract between the Trump admin and Pfizer repeatedly stated that Pfizer would develop a preventative tool for COVID-19.
"That's where if President Trump fully appreciates the… https://t.co/AKytWp3Mqt pic.twitter.com/YyU87fGbXe
Well, no more rotisserie chicken for you.
This is Kristin Peck
— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) March 6, 2023
She used to work at Pfizer & is now CEO of Zoetis, a Pfizer spinoff and the largest animal vax manufacturer in the world
She sits on the BlackRock board & is lobbying the Biden regime to vaccinate every US chicken against bird flu
Say her name pic.twitter.com/L76argnomi
In partnership with the BMGF. At this stage, is an affiliation with the BMGF all you need to know?
This is Kristin Peck, former Pfizer exec & CEO of the largest animal vaccine maker Zoetis, promoting her project to vaccinate African livestock in partnership w/the **Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation**
— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) March 6, 2023
She’s on the BlackRock board & is lobbying the Biden regime to vax US chickens pic.twitter.com/XnaB1Cz9dd
She's like Bill Gates coming for your children.
“Once you vaccinate a bird…most countries will not allow that bird into their markets”
— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) March 6, 2023
Think about this
Kristin Peck, the CEO of the biggest animal vaccine maker, wants to vax US chickens even though other countries ban those birds from being imported
Then why do it here?! https://t.co/ttvBtd3nOL
You've probably heard of her. You've probably seen her on television or at Ron Johnson's Advisory Hearing back in October 2021. But her name is Maddie de Garay and she was severely injured by the Pfizer vaccine. Here's more testimony on Maddie's condition and her parents' grief. The dad is in the medical field and her mom is an engineer who states that they both have faith in science. Yes, science can be beneficial but you can't ignore the personal agency of the purveyor of that or any science. We've all been set up by the deceit. For the doctors to dismiss her symptoms as nothing and then as some fleeting side effect that will get better over time is proof that we're all alone when it comes to government-sponsored medical procedures. No apologies. No explanation. No compensation. No restoration. Fine. Then let us take the approach: Never forget. Never forgive. Hold the line.Pfizer's trial only vaccinated 1,131 children so a single serious injury would have made the vaccine too dangerous.
— Pierre Kory, MD MPA (@PierreKory) January 11, 2023
Maddie's story shows just how far medicine will go to betray and gaslight patients who threaten its narrative. We may never know who else was swept under the rug. pic.twitter.com/4ONwty5Hu6
🔥 Pfizer: "The exact immunologic mechanism that confers protection against SARS-CoV-2 is unknown."
— Ben (@USMortality) December 1, 2022
They developed a product, but do not understand how it works! Crazy! pic.twitter.com/1GybSvgMhq
After learning of the meningitis epidemic, Pfizer decided to use it as an opportunity to test the efficacy of Trovan in pediatric settings. So they just took it upon themselves? By whose authority?
😡😡😡 pic.twitter.com/ymW4pYuYs8
— NiCoLeEliSei (@NiCoLeEliSei1) October 27, 2022
Kids and adults in Nigeria have to take a DNA test to prove they were injured by a failed drug trial by pharmaceutical company named Pfizer 15 years ago in Kano state, Nigeria.
Why have we come to accept pharmaceutical vaccines and their drug trials on human beings as just a matter of course? Where's the questioning, the conversation, the debate?
11 people were killed and several more were injured when Pfizer tested an antibiotic drug called Trovan in 1996. Now, 26 years ago. Pfizer tested out the drug on 200 children, supposed to treat [what does 'treat' mean, you know, in the vaccine maker's dictionary? For clearly, the everyday person does not operate on the same meanings of words that vaccine makers operate on and yet we're supposed to abide by their definitions and meanings. Oh, what fun.] a deadly regional outbreak [so it's confined?] of meningitis. [what do they mean by 'outbreak'? These terms refer to specific amounts of people with the disease, so what is the amount for an outbreak, 3% of the population, 5%, 7%? The media fails to inform; dare it say it, they misinform?] Pfizer agreed to pay $75 million dollars in compensation in 2009 but they introduced DNA testing as part of the process for qualifying for the payment.
The reporter continues,
Back at home, survivors like Shamsu who was crippled and their families feel the DNA test was designed to deny them of the compensation money. Many say they've already provided Pfizer with documents proving their children were part of the trial. Shamsu's father explained that "In the claim that we filled, it stated clearly 'that only when we undergo the DNA test, they will pay the compensation.'"
The Pfizer rep explained it this way, Pfizer, which denies all wrong-doing even though it's agreed to pay out $75 million dollars, said the DNA test is to guard against fraudulent claims. Wow, Pfizer really mistrusts the very people they've promised to serve. Some conflict of interest right there, I'd say.
David Odiwo, of Pfizer's Victims Trust Fund, explains that
As we're talking, we have about . . . we've collected samples from 547 people, and only 200 people participated in this study, so what do we do?
[BBC REPORTER, YVONNE NDEGE] But many of the victims are poor and illiterate. They don't understand what DNA testing is and fear it's another attempt by Pfizer to make them guinea pigs in a new drug trial. Some victims abandoned their claims when DNA testing was introduced as a condition of receiving payment. Some of the compensation money released by Pfizer has gone into building this $25 million dollar medical research and disease control center. The hope is that one day locals will be able to deal with things like outbreaks of disease and medical epidemics themselves.
Wait, isn't that exactly what they were doing before Pfizer showed up and started injecting kids with Trovan?
It may go someway to healing the wounds of Pfizer's and benefit the survivors who are simply too afraid to go for DNA testing.
If the victims of Pfizer's drug trials got $75 million in damages, how much did the governments of the african nations get paid from Pfizer to agree to have their citizens DNA tested where the device for the test could make them sick and the test is designed to collect DNA and biological dara for future drug creation by Pfizer?
From the Brookings Education,
Vaccinations are essential to responding to epidemics, and the current COVID-19 pandemic is no exception.
No, they're not. Where's the proof of that, that vaccinations are essential to responding to epidemics? Even the suggestion that some corporate body has to respond to a natural event to suddenly stop seeing people as individuals to overnight seeing people as a mass of insects that need to be dealt with through a biological agent en masse should tell you something about the ethics of that organization and to brace yourself, meaning protect yourself, against their self-imposed authority and their self-anointed expertise.
Yet, globally, many choose not to get vaccinated for reasons that have, only recently, gained attention among researchers, policymakers, and the wider public.
Yeah, people don't want them. They choose not to get vaccinated because public vaccination programs are abysmal failures. People die. People get injured. This information isn't quickly or soon forgotten. Death has a way of lodging in one's mind. Plus, with the advantage of the internet and videos, like this one, we get reminders of how horrific vaccines can be. And you wonder why people don't want to be gifted with poison? Huh. And without skipping an unethical beat, the author writes,
In 1996, Nigeria experienced one of the worst meningitis epidemics in its history with 109,580 cases and 11,717 deaths. Bacterial meningitis is an infection of the lining of the brain that is especially virulent in children. Northern Nigeria is also a majority-Muslim region, with around 99% of residents in Kano state identifying as Muslim. At a hospital in Kano, Doctors Without Borders treated children with chloramphenicol, a well-known antibiotic endorsed by the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) to treat bacterial meningitis.
So Doctors Without Borders was working with Pfizer? Good to know.
Over the same period, Pfizer, a U.S. pharmaceutical company, tried to launched a new antibiotic drug, Trovan. While Pfizer had tested the drug on adults, it had not yet been tested on children.
So, wait. Pfizer tested a drug on kids out in the field without having tested the drug on kids in a trial? Pfizer and the rest of the pharmaceutical companies see you and your kids as lab rats. They have no limiting principle.
Additionally, early testing on adults had shown some serious side effects of the drug, including liver problems and cartilage abnormalities. After learning of the meningitis epidemic, Pfizer decided to use it as an opportunity to test the efficacy of Trovan in pediatric settings.
So they just took it upon themselves? By whose authority?
Pfizer set up a site beside the Doctors Without Borders testing area and over two weeks, selected a sample of 200 children between 3 months and 18 years old to participate. A month later, 11 of the children that had participated were dead. Additionally, numerous parents of children involved in the trials reported disabilities among their children, including paralysis and liver damage.
Watch as Pfizer executive Janine Small admits to EU parliament that Pfizer did not test the vaccine for preventing transmission of Covid prior to it being made available to the public.
— True North (@TrueNorthCentre) October 11, 2022
Small says, “We had to really move at the speed of science. We had to do everything at risk.” pic.twitter.com/FvTn01zv3J
Her name is Janine Small, and she is the President of International Developed Markets at Pfizer.
Her audience is the EU Parliament, so this is like singing to the choir. Her interrogator is Rob Roos, an MEP.
Roos: Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market? If not, please say it clearly. If yes, are you willing to share the data with this committee? And I really want straight answer, yes or no, and I am looking forward to it. Thank you very much.
Small, 0:35: Um, regarding the question around, um, "Did we know about stopping immunization before it entered the market?" No [she laughs]. We had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what [was] taking place in the market.
Moving at the speed of fraud
— Dr Aseem Malhotra (@DrAseemMalhotra) October 11, 2022
And from that point of view, we had to do everything at risk. I think it was Dr. [Albert] Bourla, even though he's not here, would turn around and say to you himself that "If not us, then who?" Dr. Bourla actually felt the importance of what was going on in the world. ["felt"?] And therefore, as a result of that, we actually spent $2 billion dollars at risk of self-funded money from Pfizer [I believe countries around the world indemnified the vaccine manufacturers, meaning no risk to them] to be able to manufacture . . . first of all, research, develop, and manufacture at risk to be able to make sure that we were in a position to be able to help with the pandemic. And I think that's why I feel very good when a recent paper from the Imperial College [and here, and owned and operated by Bill Gates' money] stated that in the first year of the rollout of vaccines we saved 4 million people. So from that point of view, I feel, actually that we were there. (Could she be more vague; could she say less than nothing by saying more than wanted?) when the world needed us. (Wow, I don't remember thinking that I needed her or Pfizer or the Imperial College, do you?) to be able to make sure that we were able to help people around the world with vaccination as well as oral treatment. I would hate to imagine what situation we would be in the world right now if companies like ours did not take those risks, did not do clinical research [you didn't do clinical research] and development at scale in order to have a vaccine that we could rollout to the world. I understand your frustrations, I really do, but I also hope that at some point, somewhere you also do appreciate what pharmaceutical companies have done to rollout and deliver vaccines at such speed and scale.
Since we're talking about scale, Ms. Small, did Imperial College or Dr. Bourla inform you these numbers, these global numbers?
— The Seer (@theseer1000) October 11, 2022
PSA: The popular "Emergen-C" vit C drink is owned by Pfizer & contains GMOs! 🤢🤮 pic.twitter.com/p8TtV8qJ0v
— Natural Immunity FTW (@NaturallyFTW) October 2, 2022
The corrupt begin to fight among themselves. “BREAKING: Moderna Suing Pfizer Over COVID Vaccine”
— Kevin Shipp (@Kevin_Shipp) August 26, 2022
https://t.co/c28lAXG88P
Contains an HIV drug with a black-box warning. Has not been studied in vaccinated patients. Costs taxpayers $530+. Toxic to the liver and kidneys. What could possibly go wrong?
Paxlovid, an antiviral pill, is made by Pfizer. I wonder who is on the board of Directors at Pfizer. Any familiar names? I am sure that you're familiar with Dr. Albert Bourla.
— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) June 30, 2022
