Showing posts with label Pfizer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pfizer. Show all posts

Monday, December 2, 2024

AARON SIRI to SCOTT GOTTLIEB, MD: The plummeting decline in childhood health from the early 1980s (from less than 13% with chronic disease to now well over 50%) continued unabated while you were FDA commissioner

Pfizer board member, @ScottGottliebMD, you look foolish attacking @RobertKennedyJr on CNBC (links to clips below) because it’s clear you lack basic knowledge regarding vaccines. For example:

--Your claim that in “early 2000s … FDA reformulate[d] the existing MMR vaccine to take some of the preservatives out,” is false. Never happened. You are likely thinking about the removal of thimerosal in the early 2000s from various vaccines but as even CDC explains, “Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccines do not and never did contain thimerosal.” cdc.gov/vaccine-safety --Your claim that a child “can’t get vaccinated [for MMR] until age 2” is simply false. MMR is routinely given at one year of age and sometimes even earlier. cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/i --Your claims regarding pertussis vaccines nonsensically ignore the fact that these products do not prevent transmission of the pertussis bacteria – they only provide, at best, personal protection. As a recent consensus paper of industry pertussis vaccine “experts” explained, “aPVs [pertussis vaccine] … cannot avoid infection and transmission. … aPV pertussis vaccines do not prevent colonization. Consequently, they do not reduce the circulation of B. pertussis and do not exert any herd immunity effect.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333640/ --Your claims regarding polio nonsensically ignore the fact that the last wild case of polio in the U.S. was in 1979 and that the only polio vaccine used in the U.S. for the last 24 years only provides, at best, personal protection and does not prevent transmission of the polio virus. As CDC explains: “IPV [inactivated polio vaccine] … does not stop transmission of the virus.” cdc.gov/poliovirus-con --You claimed that “we [Pfizer] don’t make the pediatric vaccines, Pfizer is not in that market” to deflect the claim that, as a board member of Pfizer, you have a serious conflict of interest in attacking RFK Jr. regarding pediatric vaccines. But, as you no doubt know, Pfizer does sell pediatric vaccines, including the Prevnar vaccine given to babies at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months of age, which was one of Pfizer’s top three selling products in 2023.

pfizer.com/sites/default/

claim is either a lie or reveals deep ignorance. --Your claim regarding measles mortality is based on dubious and unreliable data and ignores the facts that (1) approximately 400 people total died annually in the U.S. in the years before the first measles vaccine in 1963 (amounting to around 1 death for every 500,000 Americans), and (2) mortality from measles declined by over 98% from 1900 to 1960 before the vaccine and was continuing to decline. stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/6200. In any event, you dutifully ignore the fact that RFK Jr. has made clear he has no intention of taking away vaccines from anyone who wants them. --You claim RFK Jr. will cost lives, but I would argue that ignorance regarding vaccine products does and has cost lives. I welcome a public debate in which we can discuss the number of lives ignorance about vaccines has cost versus your speculations about those RFK Jr. will supposedly cause (a man who has actually devoted his life to saving the lives of children). Your knowledge regarding these products is only matched by your track record as a public “health” official. The plummeting decline in childhood health from the early 1980s (from less than 13% with chronic disease to now well over 50%) continued unabated while you were FDA commissioner. Respectfully, you lack authority or a track record, let alone basic knowledge, to speak on the subjects you address in this interview (let alone to discuss this topic with Senators to dissuade them from confirming RFK Jr.) If you were being honest, you would reveal that your real concern, as a board member of Pfizer, is that Pfizer's golden gooses – Covid-19 vaccines, Prevnar vaccines, RSV vaccines, etc. – will have to face the reality of the devastating harms they have caused to families across America. Your interview stinks of self-interest. The time for selling out America's children so pharma and its leaders, like you, can line their pockets has come to an end. The above response to a recent CNBC segment on which you recently appeared and which you tweeted out in two parts: x.com/ScottGottliebM

Friday, November 8, 2024

PFIZER: Pfizer failed to warn patients that its injectable contraceptive drug, Depo-Provera, can increase the risk of developing a brain tumor, a lawsuit filed Monday alleges.

Wednesday, August 21, 2024

BLOOMBERG: Note that Trump doled out: $2.5B to Moderna; $2.5B to Sanofi & GSK; $1.95B to Pfizer


THE FEDERAL PLAN ON VACCINE DISTRIBUTION
OWS released a document in mid-September outlining how it would distribute vaccine doses. It has a military tone; the title is From the Factory to the Frontlines. General Paul Ostrowski, Perna’s deputy, has said the goal is to begin delivery within 24 hours of any approval or emergency use authorization, with distribution centralized and farmed out mainly through McKesson Corp., a Texas drug distributor that had an existing contract with the CDC to deliver vaccines. To track where every dose goes, OWS is building an integrated computer system that brings in the CDC’s existing systems. OWS says it expects to have as many as 75,000 injection sites across the country. States have sent the CDC proposals for how to manage distribution locally, but in mid-October the bipartisan National Governors Association submitted a long list of questions to the Trump administration about everything from funding to storage, making it clear the states don’t see a workable federal plan in place.  

Thursday, June 27, 2024

AARON SIRI: [Peter Marks] sat, as I would expect, as a partner with Pfizer, defending them from their misconduct. He should have been outraged. He should have said, "Why didn't you report this?" irrespective of why you thought this was related. You had an obligation to tell us of all injuries"

Though Dr. Peter Marks concedes that the COVID-19 vaccine causes a 5-fold increase of myocarditis in children, he still pushes the vaccines.

Saturday, March 30, 2024

JUSTIN LESLIE whistle blows on BOTH . . . Pfizer's premeditated atrocities and [PROJECT VERITAS's] withholding of life-saving information and millions of babies and children could have been spared this dangerous poison.

Justin Leslie is a former employee and a former
@Project_Veritas undercover agent. Like so many of these pharma employees, many are growing a biting conscience.

Here is Leslie's documentary, Project Whistleblower.  Wow!

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

PFIZER MAKES MIDAZOLAM, THE DRUG USED TO SEDATE PATIENTS IN PREPARATION FOR VENTILATION

You should know by now that when hospitals and doctors prescribe or give you Midazolam, they're preparing you for that lane to the great beyond. 

Tuesday, October 24, 2023

Y’all meet Peter Tontonoz, MD, PhD. He sold his myocarditis research data for $14M. Pfizer bought it and buried it! The DOJ was tipped off in 2022 by an auditor/whistleblower

Wednesday, October 11, 2023

STUNNING: Jews on the Streets of NY standing in front of Pfizer Building Calling for Genocide.

See the Pfizer building in the background at the 00:31 mark.  Unbelievable.  

Friday, August 4, 2023

PFIZER, WHICH DENIES ALL WRONG-DOING, EVEN THOUGH IT'S AGREED TO PAY OUT $75 MILLION DOLLARS, SAYS THE DNA TEST IS DESIGNED TO GUARD AGAINST FRAUDULANT CLAIMS.

This is from the 1996 meningitis outbreak in Kano, Nigeria, which means that a lot of the adults seen in this 2009 news clip were children in 1996.  I covered this last December 2022.

Oh, so Pfizer has your back.  Whew, for a minute there I think Pfizer was using the DNA tests as a kind of indemnity.  Thank God, we're working with such an ethical company.  Funny that Pfizer invents "outbreaks," "pandemics," and "epidemics."  That's their business model.  In this case here in Nigeria, the "outbreak" was meningitis.  Oh, wait, we've got a vaccine for that!  We even have one for hangnails!  Got a hangnail?  We got you.

I don't know how anybody can trust any of these vaccine manufacturers.  

From African Arguments,

In 2007, the Nigerian federal government and Kano State government filed criminal and civil suits against Pfizer and eight other defendants, asking for $7 billion in damages. The suit charged that the company had tested an unapproved and experimental drug on children with neither informed consent from parents nor approval from the Nigerian government. Pfizer countered that such approval wasn’t necessary. In 2001, an investigation by the Washington Post had uncovered that a document Pfizer claimed to prove ethical approval by Nigerian authorities for the trial appeared to be falsified and back-dated. 

11/200 children died, others had organ failure, brain damage, and paralysis 🙁.

Wednesday, July 5, 2023

IT'S NOT SCIENCE. IT'S A CRIMINAL RACKET

In the late 1970s, 11 babies died of SIDS in one area of Tennessee. They'd had the same vaccine from the same batch. You can argue whether the vaccine was the cause, but what's interesting is Wyeth's (now Pfizer) response. Call an emergency meeting with the scientists to determine if something had gone wrong with the batch and led to the deaths? Hell, no. Their response was to stop sending a single batch to a single area, instead splitting batches across the country, so no clusters like the Tennessee cluster could be noticed again. (If you think Pharma execs are more moral now than then ... well, enjoy that belief.)

More on how the baby vaccines cause SIDS. 

Thursday, June 22, 2023

Pfizer tested three versions of their product in the rat study and selected the one that increased the miscarriages the most.

To summarize, are you telling me that these jobs these Covid vaccines when given to pregnant women you're giving them an experimental drug to the unborn child?

Yes.

This goes against medical ethics this goes against the Nuremberg code.  We never experiment on children.  We never experiment on pregnant women.  We don't experiment on unborn children.

Yep.  But the pregnant women and babies are the specific Target of these programs both of them Pfizer and Moderna. Advisor in Moderna I reviewed their contracts I reviewed their clinical packages, I know it for a fact.  I can prove it in court.  If we ever get into court.  Nobody will ever get into court.  And they both targeted the . . . and the contracts came from the Department.  The Department of Defense specifically targeted pregnant women in these programs and specifically requested GLP compliance studies for the reproductive toxicity. So they wanted to make sure that data is reliable.  Pfizer tested three versions of their product in the rat study and selected the one that increased the miscarriages the most. 

Here is the full interview.

14:35. It's like taking the most toxic chemotherapy that you can imagine and start pushing it on pregnant women and children the rest of the population.

The larger the molecule, the more unstable it is.  mRNA is made up of 4,300


Sunday, June 4, 2023

NOW WE'RE GETTING SOMEWHERE: Lawsuit filed against the DOD by family of a 24-yo man killed by Pfizer-made-DOD designed, ordered, financed shot.

The correct defendants are named! Finally a case that does not bark up the “Pfizer-Pfizer-Pfizer” diversion tree, but goes for the head of the Monster via its important vital organ! The DOD and Austin (also Gen Perna who was formally COO of OWS) directed pharma to produce weapons whether the executives and underlings understood it or not is somewhat irrelevant, they were commandeered under the Defense Production Act.  --Sasha Latypova

This is a very important case to watch. The family of George Watts, Jr. a 24-year-old man who died from COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), the Chief Operating Officer of Operation Warp Speed at the time that George received 2 doses of Pfizer injections. 

Latypova continues, 

Ray Flores, the attorney filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the DOD and Lloyd Austin III in his official capacity as defense secretary.

The lawsuit alleges the DOD engaged in “willful misconduct” by continuing to exclusively allow distribution of the stockpiled version of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that had been authorized for emergency use even after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted full approval to a different vaccine, Comirnaty.

The complaint states that the DOD engaged in ‘bait and switch’ fraud,” misleading the public that Comirnaty “approval” meant that the Emergency Use authorized injections were the same and thus “safe and effective”. The vast majority of the public, including health professionals today to not understand the distinction and do not know that the injections administered to the public are still only EUA. No approved versions have been made available. Also, very few people realize that both EUA and BLA versions are “countermeasures”.

The DOD did this despite being fully aware that drugs granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) cannot legally be marketed as “safe and effective” because the FDA standard for EUA is only that drugs “may be effective.”

As a result, the lawsuit alleges, George Watts Jr. was misled into taking the investigational vaccine which lead to his death from myocarditis.

The victim’s family went through the “correct” process, applying to the Countermeasures compensation fund and not receiving a response. To date, the fund paid out a whopping $8K in 3 claims. There is an autopsy conclusion that the victim was indeed killed by the shots. 

Tuesday, May 2, 2023

"we now know that this was a big massive fraud, but the FDA has never acknowledged that it was a fraud"

Brook Jackson's complaint against Pfizer is headed to the Appeals Court.

6:02. We now know that Pfizer was secretly funding organizations to mandate their vaccine, their so-called vaccine, their drug. They were hiding their sourcing their support of it by funding organizations with other names.

Not only that.  We now know that Pfizer was involved because the contract required that [the vaccine] could only be approved, and they could only receive it, if there was no available alternative because it took the PREP Act terms, the Emergency Use Authorization, EUA, terms and explicitly put them in the contract

Pfizer knew there were alternatives that worked.  So, Pfizer was working behind the scenes to prevent anybody from knowing there were alternatives that worked, using their power in the big pharmaceutical industry to do so.

So we now know that this was a big massive fraud, but the FDA has never acknowledged that it was a fraud.  The FDA is still saying it's, still saying it's effective, still saying it's a vaccine, still saying--a little bit less now--that it's for the prevention of COVID-19, and they're saying that they don't believe Brook Jackson's complaints. They're trusting Pfizer's lies.  Well, in that case, we get to pursue our case.  We only don't get to pursue our case if Pfizer says, if the FDA says "Oh, we know Pfizer's lying.  We know it's dangerous.  We know it's ineffective.  We know it's not a vaccine."  They've never said that.  The judge got the law completely wrong.  It was lazy judges by a lazy law clerk that were working for him or just ild fashion cowardice."  

Wednesday, March 22, 2023

Pfizer claim that mRNA vaccines were “Safe and Effective” in pregnancy was based on 44 French rats . . .

Monday, March 6, 2023

"Pfizer makes El Chapo look like a street corner drug dealer. No Mexican cartel could have imagined having the deleterious and damaging and destructive effect that Prizer has had"

KRISTIN PECK: Former Pfizer Employee, Now CEO of Zoetis, & Currently Sits on the BlackRock Board. She is lobbying the Biden regime to vaccinate every US chicken against bird flu

Well, no more rotisserie chicken for you. 

In partnership with the BMGF.  At this stage, is an affiliation with the BMGF all you need to know?

She's like Bill Gates coming for your children.  

Wednesday, January 11, 2023

Maddie de Garay's Story

You've probably heard of her. You've probably seen her on television or at Ron Johnson's Advisory Hearing back in October 2021.  But her name is Maddie de Garay and she was severely injured by the Pfizer vaccine.  Here's more testimony on Maddie's condition and her parents' grief.  The dad is in the medical field and her mom is an engineer who states that they both have faith in science.  Yes, science can be beneficial but you can't ignore the personal agency of the purveyor of that or any science.  We've all been set up by the deceit.  For the doctors to dismiss her symptoms as nothing and then as some fleeting side effect that will get better over time is proof that we're all alone when it comes to government-sponsored medical procedures.  No apologies.  No explanation.  No compensation.  No restoration.  Fine.  Then let us take the approach: Never forget.  Never forgive.  Hold the line.    

Friday, December 2, 2022

Pfizer Develops a Product But Doesn't Know How It Works? But They Know for Sure That It Is "Safe and Effective".

Thursday, October 27, 2022

Pfizer Declares an Epidemic in a Region, then Takes It Upon Itself to Test the Efficacy of an Experimental Drug? By whose authority? They Act Like a Government

After learning of the meningitis epidemic, Pfizer decided to use it as an opportunity to test the efficacy of Trovan in pediatric settings. So they just took it upon themselves?  By whose authority?

Kids and adults in Nigeria have to take a DNA test to prove they were injured by a failed drug trial by pharmaceutical company named Pfizer 15 years ago in Kano state, Nigeria.  

Why have we come to accept pharmaceutical vaccines and their drug trials on human beings as just a matter of course?  Where's the questioning, the conversation, the debate? 

11 people were killed and several more were injured when Pfizer tested an antibiotic drug called Trovan in 1996.  Now, 26 years ago.  Pfizer tested out the drug on 200 children, supposed to treat [what does 'treat' mean, you know, in the vaccine maker's dictionary?  For clearly, the everyday person does not operate on the same meanings of words that vaccine makers operate on and yet we're supposed to abide by their definitions and meanings.  Oh, what fun.] a deadly regional outbreak [so it's confined?] of meningitis.  [what do they mean by 'outbreak'?  These terms refer to specific amounts of people with the disease, so what is the amount for an outbreak, 3% of the population, 5%, 7%?  The media fails to inform; dare it say it, they misinform?]  Pfizer agreed to pay $75 million dollars in compensation in 2009 but they introduced DNA testing as part of the process for qualifying for the payment.  

The reporter continues, 

Back at home, survivors like Shamsu who was crippled and their families feel the DNA test was designed to deny them of the compensation money.  Many say they've already provided Pfizer with documents proving their children were part of the trial.  Shamsu's father explained that "In the claim that we filled, it stated clearly 'that only when we undergo the DNA test, they will pay the compensation.'" 

The Pfizer rep explained it this way, Pfizer, which denies all wrong-doing even though it's agreed to pay out $75 million dollars, said the DNA test is to guard against fraudulent claims.  Wow, Pfizer really mistrusts the very people they've promised to serve.  Some conflict of interest right there, I'd say.  

David Odiwo, of Pfizer's Victims Trust Fund, explains that 

As we're talking, we have about . . . we've collected samples from 547 people, and only 200 people participated in this study, so what do we do?

[BBC REPORTER, YVONNE NDEGE] But many of the victims are poor and illiterate.  They don't understand what DNA testing is and fear it's another attempt by Pfizer to make them guinea pigs in a new drug trial.  Some victims abandoned their claims when DNA testing was introduced as a condition of receiving payment.  Some of the compensation money released by Pfizer has gone into building this $25 million dollar medical research and disease control center.  The hope is that one day locals will be able to deal with things like outbreaks of disease and medical epidemics themselves.  

Wait, isn't that exactly what they were doing before Pfizer showed up and started injecting kids with Trovan? 

It may go someway to healing the wounds of Pfizer's and benefit the survivors who are simply too afraid to go for DNA testing.  

If the victims of Pfizer's drug trials got $75 million in damages, how much did the governments of the african nations get paid from Pfizer to agree to have their citizens DNA tested where the device for the test could make them sick and the test is designed to collect DNA and biological dara for future drug creation by Pfizer?  

From the Brookings Education

Vaccinations are essential to responding to epidemics, and the current COVID-19 pandemic is no exception. 

No, they're not.  Where's the proof of that, that vaccinations are essential to responding to epidemics?  Even the suggestion that some corporate body has to respond to a natural event to suddenly stop seeing people as individuals to overnight seeing people as a mass of insects that need to be dealt with through a biological agent en masse should tell you something about the ethics of that organization and to brace yourself, meaning protect yourself, against their self-imposed authority and their self-anointed expertise.  

Yet, globally, many choose not to get vaccinated for reasons that have, only recently, gained attention among researchers, policymakers, and the wider public. 

Yeah, people don't want them. They choose not to get vaccinated because public vaccination programs are abysmal failures.  People die.  People get injured.  This information isn't quickly or soon forgotten.  Death has a way of lodging in one's mind.  Plus, with the advantage of the internet and videos, like this one, we get reminders of how horrific vaccines can be.  And you wonder why people don't want to be gifted with poison?  Huh.  And without skipping an unethical beat, the author writes,

In 1996, Nigeria experienced one of the worst meningitis epidemics in its history with 109,580 cases and 11,717 deaths.  Bacterial meningitis is an infection of the lining of the brain that is especially virulent in children.  Northern Nigeria is also a majority-Muslim region, with around 99% of residents in Kano state identifying as Muslim.  At a hospital in Kano, Doctors Without Borders treated children with chloramphenicol, a well-known antibiotic endorsed by the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) to treat bacterial meningitis.   

So Doctors Without Borders was working with Pfizer?  Good to know.  

Over the same period, Pfizer, a U.S. pharmaceutical company, tried to launched a new antibiotic drug, Trovan. While Pfizer had tested the drug on adults, it had not yet been tested on children. 

So, wait.  Pfizer tested a drug on kids out in the field without having tested the drug on kids in a trial?  Pfizer and the rest of the pharmaceutical companies see you and your kids as lab rats.  They have no limiting principle. 

Additionally, early testing on adults had shown some serious side effects of the drug, including liver problems and cartilage abnormalities.  After learning of the meningitis epidemic, Pfizer decided to use it as an opportunity to test the efficacy of Trovan in pediatric settings.  

So they just took it upon themselves?  By whose authority?

Pfizer set up a site beside the Doctors Without Borders testing area and over two weeks, selected a sample of 200 children between 3 months and 18 years old to participate.  A month later, 11 of the children that had participated were dead.  Additionally, numerous parents of children involved in the trials reported disabilities among their children, including paralysis and liver damage.