Tuesday, August 31, 2021

Resistance To "Vaccine Passports" Is Massive & Worldwide

Monumental Difference Between Being Anti-Vax and Opposing Vaccine Passports

Harvard Epidemiologist Says the Case for COVID Vaccine Passports Was Just Demolished

A 32-year-FDA veteran is quitting the agency due to the WH politically strong arming their decision making

Monday, August 30, 2021

LEE MERRITT, MD: What Is VAERS and What Does It Show?

Messianic Rhetoric of School Boards Isn't Holding

KEVIN KILEY: California vaccine passport bill, AB 455, is dead for the year.

I like it: she understands that regardless what the board of ed says, you have more authority over your children than anyone does

Medical professionals are suing Biden administration over a mandate requiring doctors to perform transgender surgeries in violation of their religious beliefs or medical judgment.

U.S. spy agencies rule out possibility the coronavirus was created as a bioweapon

Previous Covid Prevents Delta Infection Better Than Pfizer Shot

"acknowledge [that] natural immunity from prior infection exists and it outperforms vaccine immunity."

No.  No mandates at all.  No one wants the government to tell them how to take care of their bodies.  People can read health sites.  Take harmless vitamins and minerals.  Don't make mandates conditional or optional.  Understand that the very existence of mandates is essentially government rule or coercion.  

Louisiana reinstated a mask mandate, while neighboring Arkansas and Mississippi didn’t. Yet all three states turned down at the exact same time regardless.

The masks don't work.  But you go ahead and wear them if they make you feel like you're doing your part of the "we're all in this together."

Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Don't Die of COVID-19 in the Hospital; They Die of Incentivized CDC Protocols That the Hospitals Administer

Conservative Florida radio host, Marc Bernier, died recently.  That’s how it should read, but the article declares from the get-go that Bernier, who was an anti-vaxxer, died of COVID.  

Marc Bernier, a talk radio host in Daytona Beach for 30 years, died after a three-week battle with COVID-19, WNDB and Southern Stone Communications announced on Twitter Saturday night.

But how can the reader know that?  I say prove it.  Does the author of the piece, Mark Harper of the Daytona Beach News-Journal, post a copy of the death certificate?  Was an autopsy done?  The author doesn't say.  So the piece is not an investigative piece, but instead a propaganda piece that you can find from two dozen or more other news outlets.  

We learn that he was hospitalized because of COVID but you can’t presume that it was COVID that killed him.  So instead of doing even the slightest dive on what killed him, Harper instead puts at the heart of the article Marc Bernier's political position on vaccines, 

He also was an outspoken opponent of vaccinations. 

Shamelessly, Harper is using Bernier's convictions about health to make him out to be a man who died because of some conspiracy theory that vaccines are dangerous.  This is the politics driving the COVID narrative, and Mark Harper, and his editors, make sure that he does not meander too far off of the reservation. 

The message of the article is, "Isn't it a tragedy that he let his conspiratorial beliefs get in the way of life-saving vaccines?" It's also designed to suggest how naive conservatives are. 

The piece sticks to the narrative that it was COVID that killed Bernier.  But did it?  Harper writes, 

Prior to the news that Bernier had succumbed to his illness, The News-Journal interviewed several other friends, colleagues, and listeners.  

So this eulogy of sorts turns into a hit piece on Bernier.  The fact that he's a talk radio host, the hit is against free speech.  How dare he have convictions of health that challenge vaccines!  

The piece attacks his politics: he's a conservative.

The piece attacks choice.  Is it not okay to try some other treatment besides vaccines? 

 ". . . succumbed to his illness"?  Was it the illness or the treatment that killed him?  The effects of his hospital treatment are nowhere near the margins of the article.  In today’s politically charged pandemic where hospitals are incentivized to claim every death a COVID death, one ought to be a little curious if not suspicious of the causes of death coming out of hospitals.  We're certainly made to feel sorry for hospitals and their staff due to being "overwhelmed."  That, too, is a lie.  

What is important to know is that it is the CDC that dictates hospital protocol for treating COVID patients around the country.  What this means is that patients will receive whatever treatment for COVID that the CDC dictates.  No alternative remedies are allowed to be tried while a patient is hospitalized.  So what are the COVID protocols for hospitalized patients?  What medicines are approved?  The FDA has approved

. . . the antiviral drug Veklury (remdesivir) for adults and certain pediatric patients with COVID-19 who are sick enough to need hospitalization. Veklury should only be administered in a hospital or in a health care setting capable of providing acute care comparable to inpatient hospital care. 

There's just one problem with that, meaning Remdesivir: it doesn't work to prevent death.  LiveScience explains that 

The antiviral drug remdesivir does not reduce deaths among COVID-19 patients, as compared with standard care, according to the results of a large, international trial. 

Clearly, the FDA is not a reliable source of information when it comes to treating your illness.  And why would it be given the fact that the FDA receives upwards of 70% of its drug regulatory budget from the companies it is supposed to regulate?  The FDA offers up other treatments, like monoclonal antibody treatments, equally ineffective, if for no other reason to highlight their default recommendations of vaccines, 

This product [meaning monoclonal antibody treatment] is not a substitute for vaccination against COVID-19

. . . as though the vaccines are the premier option for you in your time of need.  But you have more effective options.  Intravenous vitamin C to start, but hospitals don't do that because the CDC does not approve vitamin C, or zinc or vitamin D, as a preventative of COVID.  No.  Only the FDA's approved list or their unapproved list, like their EUA drugs.  Talk about your cartel.  

The point is that when you read a headline or an article that states that the patient died of COVID, look a little closer.    

"It is people like Judge Shapiro who will create an armed revolution"

By Martin Armstrong

This is an unbelievable story of a rogue Judge James A. Shapiro who has just proven he is UNQUALIFIED to be a judge and should be removed from the bench FORTHWITH!!!! In a stunningly illegal decision that is 100% against the Constitution and everything the United States stood for, this crazy judge, Sua sponte (Latin for “of one’s own accord; voluntarily”), in the most unprecedented legal decision I have ever heard, stripped a mother of all parental rights over her son because she was NOT vaccinated. This judge presides at Chicago’s Daley Center, stripped Rebecca Firlit of custody because she refuses to get a vaccination shot. Worse is the fact that the judge simply asked her if she was vaccinated on his own accord. It was never brought up [as a concern] by her ex-husband. [Even the ex-husband's lawyer] admitted he was surprised but now defends the judge, showing [that] he too should be disbarred.

A [judge] is to listen to a dispute between two people. He is not allowed to Sua sponte raise a defense that was not presented. This shows he was not acting as a legal adjudicator but [operating on personal] BIAS and is obviously incompetent to think for himself and strips a mother of her right to see her 11-year-old son BECAUSE he believes in vaccines. Her husband should have made such an argument and then you get to put on a defense. Here, her husband made no such request and the judge denied her Due Process of Law for she was never allowed to put on defense against getting a vaccination.

It is people like Judge Shapiro who will create an armed revolution, for the purpose of a court [is] to maintain civilization by providing a forum for two parties to present their case. When that is denied, then the ONLY recourse is to an armed revolution. Civilization is about rules that we all follow. Tyranny is when there are no rules and those in power just do as they like which is what he has ruled in this case.

Edward Gibbon wrote of Emperor Commodus (177-192AD) with who historian agree began the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, that his abuse of the legal system denied any ability to obtain Due Process of Law. In the end, the ONLY recourse was a revolution because they simply assassinated him which h then cast the Roman Empire into civil war.

distinction of every kind soon became criminal. The possession of wealth stimulated the diligence of the informers; rigid virtue implied a tacit censure of the irregularities of Commodus; important services implied a dangerous superiority of merit; and the friendship of the father always insured the aversion of the son. Suspicion was equivalent to proof; trial to condemnation. The execution of a considerable senator was attended with the death of all who might lament or revenge his fate; and when Commodus had once tasted human blood, he became incapable of pity or remorse  (Book 1, Chapter 4).

That day is coming. This tyranny will not be accepted and the tyrants who think they can simply do whatever they like, will discover that history is not on their side.  

UPDATE

Sunday, August 29, 2021

COVID Madness Is Brought to You by Stanley Milgram

Thank you, Lew Rockwell.  Of the 37 men ordered executed at Nuremberg, 7 were medical doctors.  The speaker here is Patrick Coffin.

What happened to India? They were dying in the streets a month ago . . .

Death toll from COVID-19 in Oregon is climbing so rapidly in some counties that the state delivers 1 refrigerated truck to hold the bodies until the transport vehicle arrives

 

Friday, August 27, 2021

Sirhan Sirhan Paroled

901 deaths actually took place over a period of more than four weeks.

Thursday, August 26, 2021

Israel reported more cases yesterday than on any other day since the beginning of the panic, despite vaccinating 80% of adults and boosting 20%.

UPDATED VERSION of Robert Barnes' Objection Letter Against Vax Mandates

Here is Barnes' original.  You can find the below letter at VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com

Dear Boss, 

First, I request a religious exemption. "Each of the manufactures of the Covid vaccines currently available developed and confirmed their vaccines using fetal cell lines, which originated from aborted fetuses. ( https://lozierinstitute.org/an-ethics-assessment-of-covid-19-vaccine-programs/ ) For example, each of the currently available Covid vaccines confirmed their vaccine by protein testing using the abortion-derived cell line HEK-293. (https://lozierinstitute.org/an-ethics-assessment-of-covid-19-vaccine-programs/). Partaking in a vaccine made from aborted fetuses makes me complicit in an action that offends my religious faith. As such, I cannot, in good conscience and in accord with my religious faith, take any such Covid vaccine at this time. In addition, any coerced medical treatment goes against my religious faith and the right of conscience to control one’s own medical treatment, free of coercion or force. Please provide a reasonable accommodation to my belief, as I wish to continue to be a good employee, helpful to the team.

Equally, compelling any employee to take any current Covid-19 vaccine violates federal and state law, and subjects the employer to substantial liability risk, including liability for any injury the employee may suffer from the vaccine. Many employers have reconsidered issuing such a mandate after more fruitful review with legal counsel, insurance providers, and public opinion advisors of the desires of employees and the consuming public. Even the Kaiser Foundation warned of the legal risk in this respect. (https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/issue-brief/key-questions-about-covid-19-vaccine-mandates/).

Three key concerns: first, informed consent is the guiding light of all medicine, in accord with the Nuremberg Code of 1947; second, the Americans with Disabilities Act proscribes, punishes and penalizes employers who invasively inquire into their employees' medical status and then treat those employees differently based on their perceived medical status, as the many AIDS related cases of decades ago fully attest; and third, international law, Constitutional law, specific statutes, and the common law of torts all forbid conditioning access to employment, education or public accommodations upon coerced, invasive medical examinations and treatment, unless the employer can fully provide objective, scientifically validated evidence of the threat from the employee and how no practicable alternative could possibly suffice to mitigate such supposed public health threat and still perform the necessary essentials of employment. As one federal court just recently held, the availability of reasonable accommodations like accounting for prior infection, antibody testing, temperature checks, remote work, other forms of testing, and the like suffice to meet any institution’s needs in lieu of masks, public shaming, and forced injections of foreign substances into the body that the FDA admits we do not know the long-term effects of.

For instance, the symptomatic can be self-isolated. Hence, requiring vaccinations only addresses one risk: dangerous or deadly transmission, by the asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic employee, in the employment setting. Yet even government official Mr. Fauci admits, as scientific studies affirm, asymptomatic transmission is exceedingly and "very rare." Indeed, initial data suggests the vaccinated are just as, or even much more, likely to transmit the virus as the asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic. Hence, the vaccine solves nothing. This evidentiary limitation on any employer's decision-making, aside from the legal and insurance risks of forcing vaccinations as a term of employment without any accommodation or even exception for the previously infected (and thus better protected), is the reason most employers wisely refuse to mandate the vaccine. This doesn't even address the arbitrary self-limitation of the pool of talent for the employer: why reduce your own talent pool, when many who refuse invasive inquiries or risky treatment may be amongst your most effective, efficient and profitable employees?

This right to refuse forced injections, such as the Covid-19 vaccine, implements the internationally agreed legal requirement of Informed Consent established in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. (http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/). As the Nuremberg Code established, every person must "be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision" for any medical experimental drug, as the Covid-19 vaccine currently is.

Second, demanding employees divulge their personal medical information invades their protected right to privacy, and discriminates against them based on their perceived medical status, in contravention of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (42 USC §12112(a).) Indeed, the ADA prohibits employers from invasive inquiries about their medical status, and that includes questions about diseases and treatments for those diseases, such as vaccines. As the EEOC makes clear, an employer can only ask medical information if the employer can prove the medical information is both job-related and necessary for the business. (https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/questions-and-answers-enforcement-guidance-disability-related-inquiries-and-medical). An employer that treats an individual employee differently based on that employer’s belief the employee’s medical condition impairs the employee is discriminating against that employee based on perceived medical status disability, in contravention of the ADA. The employer must have proof that the employer cannot keep the employee, even with reasonable accommodations, before any adverse action can be taken against the employee. If the employer asserts the employee’s medical status (such as being unvaccinated against a particular disease) precludes employment, then the employer must prove that the employee poses a “safety hazard” that cannot be reduced with a reasonable accommodation. The employer must prove, with objective, scientifically validated evidence, that the employee poses a materially enhanced risk of serious harm that no reasonable accommodation could mitigate. This requires the employee's medical status to cause a substantial risk of serious harm, a risk that cannot be reduced by any another means. This is a high, and difficult burden, for employers to meet. Just look at the all prior cases concerning HIV and AIDS, when employers discriminated against employees based on their perceived dangerousness and ended up paying millions in legal fees, damages and fines.

Third, conditioning continued employment upon participating in a medical experiment and demanding disclosure of private, personal medical information may also create employer liability under other federal and state laws, including HIPAA, FMLA, and applicable state tort law principles, including torts prohibiting and proscribing invasions of privacy and battery. Indeed, any employer mandating a vaccine is liable to their employee for any adverse event suffered by that employee. The CDC records reports of the adverse events already reported to date concerning the current Covid-19 vaccine.(https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vaers.html)

Finally, forced vaccines constitute a form of battery and the Supreme Court long made clear "no right is more sacred than the right of every individual to the control of their own person, free from all restraint or interference of others." (https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/141/250)

With Regards,

Employee of the Year,
Thomas Paine

 

Almost 1 in 8 U.S. nurses haven’t gotten the COVID vaccine

ALBERT BOURLA, PFIZER CEO: "I might die. It's not recommended to get vaccination."

PAGE 70 MODERNA QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT: Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA"

NYC's largest police union plans to sue if COVID vaccine is mandated for NYPD

 As a footnote, Chicago’s police union ain’t going the way of the vax either. 

And Yet People Are Still Rushing to Get a Vaccine

Wednesday, August 25, 2021

More than 600,000 young adults picked up smoking during the first lockdown

[Moderna and J & J] lose their Emergency Use Authorizations, right?

It's a game the Biden admin is playing around mandates & trying to moot lawsuits about the EUA vaccines

The French Protest Vaccine Passports

There is no *available* FDA approved licensed vaccine.

San Diego

COVIDian Mindset

Noem Won’t Back GOP Bill Banning Vaccine Mandates: They Can Work Elsewhere

Tuesday, August 24, 2021

Why Vaccine Passports Are Illegal in Canada

Thank you, Martin Armstrong

Oregon Ghoul Governor Brown Mandates Masks

The comments in this tweet are excellent.  

Four newborn babies in Australia who needed heart surgery were denied due to COVID-related restrictions, and died.

Rushed polio vaccines killed many needlessly & likely created HIV/AIDS?

Rushed polio vaccines killed many needlessly & likely created HIV/AIDS."  Okay, I'd not heard that connection made before.  This is interesting.  So polio vaccines administered in the 1950s caused changes in DNA that brought about an immune deficiency?   

[admitting] that it doesn't matter what kind of mask you wear underscores the fact that mask mandates are not based on any science. Only your compliance matters

[Premier of Ontario, Doug Ford] spent 82 TIMES MORE locking down the province "responding" to C-19 than the cost to treat C-19

Anti-vaccine passport protesters trying to enter Google HQ in London

Then this from Martin Armstrong, "People Storm the London Press Over Fake News":

Resistance is not futile. A group of protestors has stormed the entrance of the headquarters of ITV News (Independent Television News) and Channel 4 News in London. They are protesting the misinformation and fakes news about COVID that the media [broadcasts] concerning the vaccines and the pandemic. Europe is up in arms more so than the United States because there the head of state can shut down the entire country. In the USA, President Biden has no such power. That belongs to the state governor.

I am WARNING all journalists, if you do NOT start rebelling against your own editorial management which has been bought off, the mob will start dragging journalists out and hanging you. This is how ALL revolutions unfold and you better wake up to what history tells you. When you are in the pocket of the government, you become the enemy of the people. It is time to boycott your editors to save humanity.

 

 

Pro-Vaccine Trump Loses % of Alabama Base

"the man who keeps the vital Vaccine Safety Datalink, and all the medical information it leads to, shut down and away from independent investigators, is . . . Anthony Fauci"

by Jon Rappoport

August 23, 2021

In this explosive 12 minute Theo Von video interview with Robert Kennedy Jr. [1], we get details of the 2016 Trump-Kennedy meeting, at which Trump gave Kennedy the go-ahead to investigate vaccine dangers.

This isn’t simply “setting the record straight” on what went down. The latest official figures on autism? 1 in 54 American children are autistic. So we are talking about the MASSIVE destruction of life, and the ongoing internal destruction of the country.

Investigating and detailing the role vaccines play in this horrific reality should be the highest priority.

Robert Kennedy, in the video interview, explains that shortly after Trump was elected in November of 2016, the new president contacted him (Kennedy) and invited him for a meeting at Trump Tower in New York.

During the two-hour sit-down with Trump, Kennedy explained that a comprehensive investigation of vaccines could be done without any heavy lifting by government. There was a well-known Vaccine Safety Datalink [2] [2b] [2c] [2d] which, when opened, would give independent researchers access to a vast trove of US medical records. From those records, a convincing case could be made about vaccine safety/dangers.

Trump gave Kennedy the green light to move ahead.

However, roadblocks then appeared.

Access to the Vaccine Safety Datalink and the medical records was severely limited. Two independent investigators were confined to one room—with only pencil and paper—to study medical records. The room was intentionally overheated to a temperature of 105. No copying-machine use was permitted.

Then Pfizer made a million-dollar contribution to Trump’s inauguration.

Then Trump made two grotesque appointments to his new administration—Scott Gottlieb as FDA commissioner, and Alex Azar as head of Health and Human Services. Both men had heavy pharmaceutical industry connections. Azar had served as chief of US Eli Lilly and had sat on the board of the pharma trade group, the Biotechnology Innovation Organization. Scott Gottlieb was a director at Tolero Pharmaceuticals [acquired by Sumitomo] and the giant drug company, Daiichi Sankyo. He also worked for Glaxo; and now, in 2021, after his stint as FDA commissioner, Gottlieb sits on the board of Pfizer.

Robert Kennedy’s vaccine investigation was shut down.

Did Kennedy then reach out directly to President Trump, to try to reignite the vaccine probe? The video interview doesn’t address this.

Did Trump ever explain why he allowed Kennedy’s investigation to crash and burn? Or why, at the 2016 New York meeting, he told Kennedy to announce the formation of the vaccine investigation, instead of announcing it himself, as the new President? Not to my knowledge.

One other thing. In this video interview, Kennedy says the man who keeps the vital Vaccine Safety Datalink, and all the medical information it leads to, shut down and away from independent investigators, is . . .

Anthony Fauci.

Once upon a time in the Empire, all roads led to Rome. Now they lead to the Good Doctor, and onward to Bill Gates.

Monday, August 23, 2021

Vaccine Mandate Objection Letter via Robert Barnes

Employer Letter Example: Vaccine Mandate Objection

No authorship claim or copyright asserted . . . A letter that also came to me via a route like a letter in a bottle.

Dear Boss,

First, I request a religious exemption. "Each of the manufactures of the Covid vaccines currently available developed and confirmed their vaccines using fetal cell lines, which originated from aborted fetuses. (https://lozierinstitute.org/an-ethics-assessment-of-covid-19-vaccine-programs/) For example, each of the currently available Covid vaccines confirmed their vaccine by protein testing using the abortion-derived cell line HEK-293. (https://lozierinstitute.org/an-ethics-assessment-of-covid-19-vaccine-programs/) Partaking in a vaccine made from aborted fetuses makes me complicit in an action that offends my religious faith. As such, I cannot, in good conscience and in accord with my religious faith, take any such Covid vaccine at this time. In addition, any coerced medical treatment goes against my religious faith and the right of conscience to control one’s own medical treatment, free of coercion or force. Please provide reasonable accommodation to my belief, as I wish to continue to be a good employee, helpful to the team.


Equally, compelling any employee to take any current Covid-19 vaccine violates federal and state law, and subjects the employer to substantial liability risk, including liability for any injury the employee may suffer from the vaccine. Many employers have reconsidered issuing such a mandate after more fruitful review with legal counsel, insurance providers, and public opinion advisors of the desires of employees and the consuming public. Even the Kaiser Foundation warned of the legal risk in this respect. (https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/issue-brief/key-questions-about-covid-19-vaccine-mandates/)

Three key concerns: first, informed consent is the guiding light of all medicine, in accord with the Nuremberg Code of 1947; second, the Americans with Disabilities Act proscribes, punishes, and penalizes employers who invasively inquire into their employees' medical status and then treat those employees differently based on their perceived medical status, as the many AIDS-related cases of decades ago fully attest; and third, international law, Constitutional law, specific statutes, and the common law of torts all forbid conditioning access to employment, education, or public accommodations upon coerced, invasive medical examinations and treatment, unless the employer can fully provide objective, scientifically validated evidence of the threat from the employee and how no practicable alternative could possibly suffice to mitigate such supposed public health threat and still perform the necessary essentials of employment. As one federal court just recently held, the availability of reasonable accommodations like accounting for prior infection, antibody testing, temperature checks, remote work, other forms of testing, and the like suffice to meet any institution’s needs in lieu of masks, public shaming and forced injections of foreign substances into the body that the FDA admits we do not know the long-term effects of.

For instance, the symptomatic can be self-isolated. Hence, requiring vaccinations only addresses one risk: dangerous or deadly transmission, by the asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic employee, in the employment setting. Yet even government official Mr. Fauci admits, as scientific studies affirm, asymptomatic transmission is exceedingly and "very rare." Indeed, initial data suggests the vaccinated are just as, or even much more, likely to transmit the virus as asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic. Hence, the vaccine solves nothing. This evidentiary limitation on any employer's decision-making, aside from the legal and insurance risks of forcing vaccinations as a term of employment without any accommodation or even exception for the previously infected (and thus better protected), is the reason most employers wisely refuse to mandate the vaccine. This doesn't even address the arbitrary self-limitation of the pool of talent for the employer: why reduce your own talent pool, when many who refuse invasive inquiries or risky treatment may be amongst your most effective, efficient, and profitable employees?

This right to refuse forced injections, such as the Covid-19 vaccine, implements the internationally agreed legal requirement of Informed Consent established in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. (http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/). As the Nuremberg Code established, every person must "be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior forms of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision" for any medical experimental drug, as the Covid-19 vaccine currently is.


Second, demanding employees divulge their personal medical information invades their protected right to privacy and discriminates against them based on their perceived medical status, in contravention of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (42 USC §12112(a).) Indeed, the ADA prohibits employers from invasive inquiries about their medical status, and that includes questions about diseases and treatments for those diseases, such as vaccines. As the EEOC makes clear, an employer can only ask for medical information if the employer can prove the medical information is both job-related and necessary for the business. 

(https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/questions-and-answers-enforcement-guidance-disability-related-inquiries-and-medical). An employer that treats an individual employee differently based on that employer’s belief the employee’s medical condition impairs the employee is discriminating against that employee based on perceived medical status disability, in contravention of the ADA. The employer must have proof that the employer cannot keep the employee, even with reasonable accommodations, before any adverse action can be taken against the employee. If the employer asserts the employee’s medical status (such as being unvaccinated against a particular disease) precludes employment, then the employer must prove that the employee poses a “safety hazard” that cannot be reduced with reasonable accommodation. The employer must prove, with objective, scientifically validated evidence, that the employee poses a materially enhanced risk of serious harm that no reasonable accommodation could mitigate. This requires the employee's medical status to cause a substantial risk of serious harm, a risk that cannot be reduced by any other means. This is a high, and difficult burden, for employers to meet. Just look at all prior cases concerning HIV and AIDS, when employers discriminated against employees based on their perceived dangerousness and ended up paying millions in legal fees, damages, and fines.


Third, conditioning continued employment upon participating in a medical experiment and demanding disclosure of private, personal medical information, may also create employer liability under other federal and state laws, including HIPAA, FMLA, and applicable state tort law principles, including torts prohibiting and proscribing invasions of privacy and battery. Indeed, any employer mandating a vaccine is liable to their employee for any adverse event suffered by that employee. The CDC records reports of the adverse events already reported to date concerning the current Covid-19 vaccine.   (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vaers.html)


Finally, forced vaccines constitute a form of battery, and the Supreme Court long made clear "no right is more sacred than the right of every individual to the control of their own person, free from all restraint or interference of others."   (https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/141/250)


With Regards,

Employee of the Year,
Thomas Paine

 

ISRAEL: [M]andatory booster shots every 6 months?

"For your safety, guards will be patrolling the streets, the air, and the playgrounds for happy children . . ."

Abrien Aguirre shares what he witnessed which is shocking to say the least.

Find comments on the topic here.

In three separate COVID units, he shares what he witnessed which is shocking, to say the least.

Update: Abrien was officially fired from his job on August 19 for sharing his truth with us!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZUsFl7WG4ThX/

Abrien sacrificed his occupation to bring us this truth. You can help him pay for his legal fees by donating to the links below:

To Contact Abrien:
aabrien@gmail.com
Donate / Help Abrien and his family
https://gofund.me/059ce994
Also PayPal @abrienaguirre

Occupational therapists are healthcare professionals who work with people of all ages with various health issues. They work to adapt surroundings and tasks to help people live better with disabilities, injuries, or illnesses. They work in many different settings such as clinics, hospitals, and nursing facilities.

Puppet Governor Ige’s dictatorial vaccine mandates have backfired on the COVID narrative as state and federal employees, healthcare workers, hotel industry workers, and other folks risk losing their jobs for not wanting to get the experimental gene therapy injection. A lot of people are starting to come out and expose the greatest scam of the 21st century as they are forced to move to a freer state on the mainland to work and support their families. The medical tyranny here in Hawaii is coming to a state/city near you. God bless the whistleblowers!

PFIZER'S FDA APPROVAL: no public hearing; no transparency; no open review of vaccine data

The FDA receives upwards of 70% of its drug regulatory budget from the companies it is supposed to regulate.

Here is further support of this perverse arrangement

It just gets more and more absurd.  The scientific community is a farce.  From The Conversation

The Food and Drug Administration has moved from an entirely taxpayer-funded entity to one increasingly funded by user fees paid by manufacturers that are being  regulated. Today, close to 45% of its budget comes from these user fees that companies pay when they apply for approval of a medical device or drug.

Sunday, August 22, 2021

Australian former NBA star Andrew Bogut says he was offered money to promote lockdowns

[Ivermectin] has saved untold people from going blind; its discoverers won the Nobel Prize.

Also, Ivermectin is inexpensive.

"What's happening in Australia almost defies belief. Profound respect for these dissidents"

Spike Proteins Are the Toxin; They Blow Out the Mitochondria of Your Cells

Two conditions you'll need to manage for the rest of your life.  One, clotting.  For blood clots, you'll need to take Nattokinase.  It is an enzyme and the most effective anti-clotting agent on the market without a prescription.  It works well on fibrin clotting as well.  My concern is that the urgency to remedy these clots will create shortages.  This week already, I've seen Swanson's Nattokinase product rise in price from $9 to $12, which tells me the demand is high.  The second concern is two-fold: inflammation and blood vessel integrity.  For both, you'll need vitamin C and Resveratrol.  These reduce the production and effects of spike proteins by 98%.  It's not 100% but until ethical nutritional companies develop a product or combination of compounds that stop their development and their poisonous effects, these are your best options. 

It looks like Camostat, an anti-androgen hormone prevents spike proteins from entering your cells.  

 

"It's All About Freedom. Either You're Free or You're Not . . . Those Who've Been in Prison Are Terrified of Freedom"

Saturday, August 21, 2021

It's the Hospital Protocols That Are Killing People

Thank you, Campbell, at LRC, who writes,

Should you get sick, do every single thing you can to not end up in a hospital. Hospitals will test for Covid ($$$$) and run the PCR at a high cycle threshold so that it will come back with “Covid positive.” Therein begins the deceit. You are the hospital’s next revenue center.

I can tell you from firsthand experience that she is absolutely correct about how these events occur. This is happening, and chances are high that a hospital and its legion of monkey-see-monkey-do doctors will kill you should you end up in ICU with any respiratory distress.

Doctors have become protocol-following killing machines.