Tuesday, May 31, 2022

The W.H.O.'s Pandemic Treaty

 

Couple of important links from Tom's show notes:

“States must pre-emptively nullify any WHO international pandemic regulations,” Daniel Horowitz


“The WHO is commiting a power grab,” Eva Vlaardingerbroek




Posted by at No comments:

They were buying assets via QE and simultaneously sucking the money back out via reverse repo

Posted by at No comments:

Once the party of workers' rights and anti-discrimination, Democrats today are all for corporate power

Posted by at No comments:

MADNESS

Posted by at No comments:

Sussman Acquitted Because of a Partisan DC Jury. And Because the FBI Colluded With Sussman From the Beginning

So Sussmann admits to lying and gets acquitted . . . for lying?  

Sussmann was charged under 18 U.S.C. 1001 with lying to the FBI during a meeting with then-FBI general counsel James Baker when he came forward with what he claimed was evidence of possible covert communications between the Trump organization and Alfa, a Russian bank. Sussmann allegedly concealed that he was representing the Clinton campaign, which he billed for his efforts.

Posted by at No comments:

Senator Barack Obama? Money Laundering? Ukraine BioLabs? 2005?

Posted by at No comments:

They're either coming for your money, coming for your children, or coming for your guns . . .

Posted by at No comments:

Monday, May 30, 2022

TRUDEAU BANS LEGAL OWNERSHIP OF GUNS TO CANADIANS

Can we expect some breakaway provinces?   

Canadian Prime Minister, "Black Face," Justin Trudeau is going the way of Pol Pot. 

Posted by at No comments:

A little Monday evening beauty

Mosaic floor of 3rd-4th century CE. Paphos Archaeological Park, Cyprus


 

Posted by at No comments:

MARKETS A LOOK AHEAD. By Gregory Mannarino

Posted by at No comments:

With one of the world's harshest lockdowns, and despite a relatively young low-risk population, Peru reports the highest covid mortality in the world.

Posted by at No comments:

Sustained intake of cranberry over a 12-week period produced significant improvements in memory and neural function in older adults who were cognitively healthy

Cranberry juice is a diuretic, which means you might eliminate more amounts of it rather than absorb it.  For greater absorption, try the concentrate tablets. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Do Gov't Sanctions Have the Opposite Effect of Their Stated Intention?

Posted by at No comments:

Quercetin + curcumin + nattokinase + EGCG[from green tea] + resveratrol all disaggregate amyloid fibrils.

Posted by at No comments:

Major lawsuits challenge illegal drop boxes in Wisconsin, criminal charges brought against mules in Arizona, and election law reforms pass Arizona

Posted by at No comments:

80% of people do not have the psychological and moral resources to defy an authority's order?

Posted by at No comments:

Sunday, May 29, 2022

"We're gonna lose a major war."

Posted by at No comments:

The Sussmann trial is exposing the FBI for what it is: A bizarre mixture of unimaginable corruption and unfathomable incompetence.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

The gunman in the Texas school rampage was shot and killed by a Border Patrol agent who rushed to the scene without waiting for backup

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

“The root of malevolence, and you see this in Cain and Abel, is the desire for revenge against God for creation itself"

Posted by at No comments:

RED MEAT IS RICH IN ESSENTIAL MINERALS--IRON, SELENIUM, & ZINC

Posted by at No comments:

The Drug War On Your Kids


Thanks to Drug Awareness.  Are you understanding that phrase "War on Drugs" a bit better now that you've been vaccinated or do you think the vaccines have nothing to do with the War in Drugs?  So between your ears all you hear is the Nancy Reagan prescription of "just say no"?  Every government foray into medicating its citizens has been a complete and utter failure ti its citizens.  To those running these public medication programs, why, it's been a great boon.  But you'll forget.  You'll forget.  You'll repeat history.  The propaganda will come along and claim some new disaster that you'll get in line for, effectively over your personal sovereignty and body integrity to some public health official.  You've always gotten in line.  You're good at getting in line and standing patiently in line, tucked in between others who, like you, love the anonymity of getting lost in line.  It's been some of your best work.  

When Richard Nixon announced his refrain of the ongoing war on drugs in 1971, he by no means started it.  The drug war predates the 20th century, is, in fact, the gears of the Progressive movement, it's takeover and transformation of the United States at about the time of the Civil War.

Looking for an interesting history on the drug war?  Check out this article by Mark Thornton.

When I went to the Oxford Union debates this past summer I was told by a veteran of the debates that I must have a joke in order to win over the audience. My attempt to win over the British audience was a success, but unfortunately my opening remarks are too close to the truth and in retrospect, are really not that funny:

Mr. Chairman, I want to thank you for the opportunity to debate the War on Drugs in this forum. Mr. Chairman, as you probably know, the War on Drugs was not a response to calls from experts, it was not in response to recommendations from the medical community, or even the law enforcement community. Mr. Chairman, the War on Drugs was started by the agitation of racists, bigots, religious fanatics, believers in eugenics, extremist politicians, and power hungry diplomats. In other words, Mr. Chairman, the average ordinary American.

The War on Drugs was initiated by legislation that was passed not to help drug addicts and protect the innocent, but rather was designed to control and marginalize minority groups and to push the United States into a leadership role in world diplomatic affairs.

The War on Drugs is 100 years old today. It kills thousands of people, destroys untold number of lives, and wastes hundreds of billions of dollars every year. Plus it prevents us from using three of the most miraculous plants on the planet, even for their “legitimate” uses.

The Harrison Narcotics Act

As written, the Harrison Narcotics Act of 1914 was legislation that established a tax and registration requirement on narcotics and cocaine. Politicians and journalists openly targeted Chinese immigrants, Southern blacks, and Mexicans with outrageous propaganda. The real priority of the legislation, however, was to comply with the first international drug control treaty, the International Opium Convention of 1912.

As implemented, the legislation quickly evolved into an outright prohibition. Enforcement bureaucrats argued that doctors prescribing narcotics for drug addiction was an illegitimate medical practice. The courts ruled in their favor and addict-maintenance medical practices and addiction clinics were forced to close.

Marijuana prohibition went national with the passage of the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937. It too quickly changed from a measure to tax and regulate into an outright prohibition. Even hemp, the non-intoxicating form of cannabis was banned! When propaganda claiming that marijuana was deadly and caused insanity, violence, and criminal behavior was debunked (aka Reefer Madness), the “gateway theory” was born to fill the void. The gateway theory posits that while marijuana might not be addictive or dangerous, it would lead the user to try the hard drugs, such as heroin. This theory became the prevailing view in the second half of the twentieth century.

Continue reading . . . 

 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, May 27, 2022

"Sweden, the country that eschewed strict lockdowns, had some of the lowest mask usage anywhere on earth . . ."

Posted by at No comments:

"Hey, Beto, how do you feel exploiting dead kids?"

Posted by at No comments:

RFK, Jr: YOU CAN'T STOP TYRANNY BY COMPLYING

Posted by at No comments:

"No major media outlet has called out these dystopian plans for total control,"

Thanks to Martin Armstrong. 

The self-proclaimed elites have gathered in Switzerland at the World Economic Forum (WEF). One of the newest ideas is a microchip in pill form. No, this is not a conspiracy theory. The president of Pfizer spoke publicly about a pill that would dissolve in the stomach and send an immediate signal to all storing your data that you complied and took the pill. “Imagine the implications of that – the compliance!” Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla daydreamed.

The WEF crowd has publicly shared their ideas to build a total surveillance system and microchip human beings to gain ultimate control. “Once you can hack something, you can also engineer it,” Yuri Harari, Schwab’s top mouthpiece, said in 2018.

No major media outlet has called out these dystopian plans for total control, and any mention of the topic will result in an instant ban from all social media platforms. Microchips are NOT a conspiracy theory; rather, it is a plan that they are currently devising and will implement once the opportunity presents itself. Do not comply.

 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

LOOKS LIKE THE DIFFERENCE IN EXECUTION HAS MORE TO DO WITH CASH, COVID CASH

Clearly there was just too much COVID money in circulation, the law enforcement that did not act the other day in Uvalde, Texas had simply become addicted and more deferential to control and command and sluggish authority.  

Posted by at No comments:

DAMNING: more people died because bureaucrats followed the *political* science, not the past 50 years of real science, which always confirmed masks don’t stop viruses.

Posted by at No comments:

RAT LIOTTA DID COMMERCIALS FOR PFIZER & TOOK THEIR PRODUCT

And who manufactures Chantix? 

That's right, Pfizer. 

Oh, you're good. 

Posted by at No comments:

Dr. Tau Braun on Venomation of COVID-19 Spike Protein

Interesting interview. Refreshing to hear Jany Ruby at 28:13 say about McCullough and Dr. Kory, whom I've liked, that "these are people running opposition."  That's a pretty damning indictment for a guy that has been anointed as the antidote to Fauci.  Turns iut that McCullough is just a foil to Fauci.  The interview gets quite interesting at the 26:30 mark. He says to avoid milk sugars and to consume nothing that ends in "ose," dextrose, lactose, etc.  Do not discount information that is odd or out of the ordinary.  Sift through the information but don't discount it.

Dr. Tau Braun is a Counter BioTerrorism expert.

Ivermectin works because it binds to the same receptors as the snake venom gene does.  He makes that point here.  By the way, his envenomation information corroborates what Dr. Brian Ardis pointed out back in April and got slammed for.  

The SARS-CoV-2 is resistant to copper.  The bats grew up in copper mines and are resistant to it, says Dr. Braun.  He adds that you cannot take zinc without copper.  I've never heard that before.  I've heard that zinc must be taken with magnesium and vitamin D, selenium, and vitamin E, but never heard that about copper.  

I take that back.  I actually did read this article on zinc by Bill Sardi back when it was published in 2017. 



This is just phenomenal.  

Sardi says that “overlooked is the importance of zinc in acting as a mimic of insulin and in maintaining mental acuity.”  Wished I’d known.  

But Dr. Braun continues at 21:41, saying, "This is a mutant of a pathogen.  This pathogen has got death written all over it, all sorts of death mechanisms, including prion disease that people know from deer wasting, from mad cow disease.  It's got these [kinases? inaudible] in it that cut up the body.  It's got an HIV insert that makes the body react to.  It's got an antigen that the body reacts to in terms of . . . it's perceived as a pathogen so the body fights it.  And then it's got venom mechanisms where the venom allows certain mechanisms to take place.  It can trip cells.  The big thing with mRNA, the technology, is that it is using venom to trick cells to accept it, and then it gets into the cell and the cell replicates it.  It's like a handcuff key that gains access, little ways that trips the body and then hijack the cell . . . a trick in the cells to open."  

24:06  I believe the government is trying to kill us.  When Dr. Brian Ardis said "the government is purposely putting this in the water to kill people," um, that would make no sense in terms of the economy of a country, in terms of the strength of a country, ah, nobody has the ability to be an intentional killer and goes out and does things without being specific.  So intentional violence is targeted.  So the target in the U.S. is no different than a culling that people would do in an animal population. 24:55 

Okay, so the venom peptides can be synthesized.  

So pick yourself up some nicotine lozenges.  

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, May 26, 2022

BUSINESSES ARE NOT ABOVE THE LAW . . . they can't make you take a line of cocaine as a condition of coming into the store . . . [They're] not your own legislative body.

John Jay Singleton is a consultant from Orange County, Florida.  His website is called Ace of Coins.  You'll find a "Help" link on that page where you write a message to John.  
Laws are not written to give you rights.  Laws are written to restrict those from violating your rights.  --Peggy Hall
 

To be clear, Peggy makes a joke when she says that companies can do anything, hey, they're a private company. A few conditions with that. One, when a company claims to be private, what they're claiming is that they're not government-owned the way some are under communism. Two, privately owned does not mean they're a private club that requires annual or monthly dues and access is only to men or to white men or rich men.  Three, businesses are not above the law or cannot violate their own law in their own corporate charter. 

Here is a 56-page guide on how to sue Sprouts. 

7:00. "Grocery store won't let you in?  Okay, that's false imprisonment."   

Don't have to sue Sprouts but you can put them on notice. 

12:55. "You have a right to rely upon the law.  . . . you want to pick a fight and win it."  There's a money interest behind everything we're seeing.  Sprouts is the bad boy.  Let's see who is out there that's going to make the rest of us pay.  Fine.   

14:09. Put them on notice.  1.  Notify the Chief Counsel.

So many holes in their scam that if they succeed in what they're doing, it's on us. There's no reason why they should prevail in this . . . the moneyed interests who want us to submit. 14:47.  

16:30. Document what's going on. 

17:22. It's illegal to stop you.  It's illegal to stop your path.  It's illegal to touch you.  Illegal to prevent you from continuing to walk.  

18:14. If you're walking into any business that is open to the public, and they try to stop you it's a crime.  It's known as unlawful restraint or false imprisonment to prevent you from going somewhere. Even if you have the freedom to leave that area, your liberty to go into that store available to anyone else has been strained against your will and that's a crime.  The person doing that to you can be arrested.

18:50. Making a scene is not our solution.  Documenting it is where we win.  

18:55. Understanding your right when you walk in the store no matter what anyone says to you.  You can ignore them and keep on walking.

19:02. You don't have to tell them anything.  If they physically restrain you, that's another issue. 

19:27. If Sprouts intends to deny services to you, you'll be informed of that.  The manager will tell you.  What happens when the manager sends over their monkees?  He and his friend both got banned from Sprouts.  That's not winning.  

20:04. My manager said I can't sell this to you.  

Are you denying me service because of the disability I have? 

MGR: No, we're not doing that because you won't comply with the law!

20:12. Well, I just want to get confirmation that I'm being denied services because I have a disability. (Get that admitted somehow; have that discussion)

And I got his name, that's important too.

NOTICE OF DISCRIMINATION, an incident report form. Not a legal document but it's very satisfying.  Date, person's name, what they look like, this is the name of the store, here's what went on, serve it to the person, snap a photo of it, so you have a record and a document.  

21:38. Get them to acknowledge it in some way.  Incident report becomes an element in a cause of action.  A Cause of Action means you CAN sue them, but you don't have to.  Include a one-half-page letter to the CEO, the Chief Counsel, this is an attorney now and his job is to manage risk for the ENTIRE COMPANY.  He measures out the insurance rates, consults with the insurance companies, and tells the store what its policy should be regarding . . . spills.  

Document it and you're halfway there.  But you also want to get the person who is responsible for that facility, for the premises at that time.  You'd be surprised.  We went ti Planet Obstacle recently and the cashier want me and my 2 little girls to wear masks.  And I asked, "Are you the manager for this facility right now?"  He says yeah.  I said are you responsible for the entire facility at this time?  Then he weighed it and said yeah.  That means something to these people.  Okay, you're requiring medical intervention for me and my two daughters.  So if I act upon your medical intervention and have them wear a mask like you're saying, and they go out and play and you've not conducted any medical examination, so you don't know their medical history at all, nor are you competent . .  is there a physician on-site?  So are you willing to accept the responsibility and liability if one of my daughters collapses in an unconscious state?  Do you have insurance for this?  

He said, look, you guys don't have ti do all that stuff.  He was going to let us come in for free.  

I'll pay.  I just want to see where we are here with liability.  Next thing he knew, all the kids in the place took their masks off and had a good time.  Parents took their masks off because they saw my family without their masks on, so . . . .

24:09.  So bring the store manager over and get that person to identify, and admit, that he or she is responsible for that entire property.  Then you get them to say, "Okay, are you denying me services now?" and Because the reason is that I am unable to wear a mask, or am unwilling because it violates my religious convictions.  And no matter what, no matter what they, they're going to deny you the service, you're done.  Then leave.  You don't have to push it to where the police come.  

24:45  The other day, the police did show up because the manager was flustered.  While he called the police, other customers heard the conversation and they came out and said, "Yeah, this is crazy.  We shouldn't be doing this."  this was at Sprouts.  I went with a client, who was in the area.  Cop arrives and asks if they're the guys the manager called about, and he said yeah, and the cop said, well, have a nice day.  

25:35  ***If the police are called, that is cause for more damages.  The cause is exacerbating the situation unnecessarily.  He didn't need to do that.  There was no . . . 

25:50  When a business is open to the public, it has its own policies.  They can make their own policies, but they still have to be within the confines of the law.  They can't run, which they're trying to do, a demonic cult, right?  They can't make you take an aspirin or a line of cocaine as a condition of coming into the store, right?  They can't make those kinds of policies obviously.  Sure you guys can make whatever policy you want but you still can't break the law.  You're not your own legislative body.   

26:45  Peggy:  Police show up and say, "Store policy, store policy."  I never want to hear that again.  Bring the NOTICE OF DISCRIMINATION WITH YOU WHENEVER YOU ARE GOING OUT.  Add the name of the manager.  You're very calm, you're polite, and you say, "Hey, I just want to be sure that you're requiring a medical intervention, so are you the physician on staff?" and they'll go "No."  Can I talk to the person in charge of the facility?  They come over and you confirm, "So, you're in charge of the entire facility at this time?" and they will either say yes or no.  You get their name as well and say "I just want to see where we are here with liability because you're requiring me and my kids to wear a mask, and you know, you're not their doctor, you haven't examined them, so I want to make sure that if something bad happens--do you have the liability to handle this?  Don't blow it out of proportion.  Hopefully, it's not going to escalate to where the police come.  If they deny you, you fill out that INCIDENT REPORT, which you will use when you do the CAUSE OF ACTION, which might be suing, it might not, but if they call the police, that actually makes your case even stronger because that was an unnecessary action.  If they charge you with trespassing and they ask you to leave, it's a good idea to leave.  You don't want to damage your stance by being belligerent, or by causing a public nuisance, but you want to have the strongest course of action possible.  If you are being harassed . . . I've had a Healthy American member who was being pelted with walnuts in bulk, someone taking a clump of them and throwing them at them.  That's assault.  And that's when you call the sheriff and you say I'm reporting a crime in progress.  

30:15  Think of it as a Slip and Fall.  That's exactly the liability that that property owner or manager has.  Now sometimes they're covered, and sometimes they're not because there's an issue of negligence for which they would not be covered.  An example would be breaking the law and resulting in an injury.  So here's an example.  I walk into a store, and the guy with a mask says, "You must have a mask or else you can't come in here," and he blocks my way.  Okay, that's a crime right there.  What crime?  Because the moment I have a civil cause of action, I also have a criminal cause of action.  

31:00  Florida statutes, 687 or 681, if you're wearing a mask, usually that's not a problem.  In some jurisdictions, or in some cases, that is a problem to wear a mask, or it used to be.  If you're wearing a mask now, and you're doing a certain thing, that is literally a crime.  [Okay, John, I need specifics here.]  That's a 2nd-degree misdemeanor in Florida.  So a person who's an employee of a business who is standing at the entrance, who gets in your way and says you can't come in here unless you do a thing, whatever that is, that's a crime.  It's also an assault.  I'm not saying these people need to be prosecuted, but just realize what your rights are and what their obligations are, and realize what the law is.  It's assault when you feel intimidated by someone wearing a mask.  That's the definition of assault.  That's a trespass on you.  It's called a TRESPASS ON THE PERSON.  There are a lot of trespass issues, so let me explain how that works.  

32:24  When you're walking into a retail place of businesses open to the public, it is not a private membership association; it's not a private club.  It's open to everybody, whoever you are.  Obviously, you've got to wear clothes, right?  Obviously, there are standards that we have: you have to have shirts and shoes.  It is not trespass when you're in a public building and the manager tells you to leave for any reason.  If the manager calls the cops, and the cops tell you to leave, the cop can then give you a trespass warning . . . .  They can make it to where you can never go back there unless you want to be arrested.  That has to do with how the legislature wrote the language in the statute.  You can get out of that, but you have to argue the case.  You've got to be in court.  I recommend avoiding that but understand this: when you go into a store, you have an irrevocable license to be there.  Why?  Because it's open to the public.  It's an irrevocable license.  A license is the privilege of being there.  The privilege was extended by all the investors, store owners, and managers that opened the store up and said, "Hey, guys, come on in and buy our stuff."  That's the privilege.  Now, if I go over to my neighbor's house next door and open the door and walk into his kitchen, open the fridge and get some pudding or something, that I don't have a privilege for.  He can shoot me for that.  

34:00  I do have that privilege at Publix.  So, for someone to come along and impose illegal requirements or act in an unlawful way is a trespass against you.  You are not trespassing.  Now because you have an irrevocable license does not mean that you can do anything you want.  If you disrupt the business or you hassle people, make a scene . . . you have to really hassle people.  If you call the manager for help on something, that's not really harassing anybody even though the manager may not want to talk to you.  But because you have an irrevocable license, it's not trespass unless there is a violation, and that's a keyword.  For example, if someone calls the cops on you, the cops understand this part of it.  they're trained differently.  Sometimes you can talk to them if you want to talk to them.  Understand that you have an irrevocable right to be there, so if the cops show up . . . and let's say that you were shopping and someone decides to call the cops on you even though you've done nothing, if the police say, "Look, the manager called us and says that you're trespassing,  [35:11] and he wants you to leave, your response would be "Has there been a violation?"  And you'll watch the police officer--he knows what that is.  You're trying to persuade anyone; I'm not trying to win an argument with a cop.  What you're trying to do is document what is going on here.  "I talked to Officer Jones, on this date, at this time, apparently the manager called the police on me while I was shopping.  At the time, the store was open to the public, as they always are, and I asked the officer if he had any evidence of any violation, "Do you have evidence of any violation?"  Am I being accused of violating the public peace, breaching the peace, harassing anyone, what type of violation is it, Officer?  Now, you're not trying to be flippant with him or anything.  You literally want to know.  See what his response is and make a record of this.  You've got to write it down, take a picture, do a voice recording onto your phone.   If there's been no violation, there is no trespass.  There is no trespass unless there's a violation.  

37:00  When the cops come out, you can be removed if there is a violation or if there is no violation.  And if you want to challenge it, there are causes of action that are civil.  You can also challenge it by going the route of getting arrested, which I don't recommend. Not sure you'd win the case if you allowed yourself to get arrested . . .because it's not necessary.  It's a civil matter but you can win on the fact that there's been no violation. 

37:25  And the judge might say to you like, "What's the problem?  Why don't you just leave?  You're in the right but why didn't you just leave?  For example, one store wouldn't let us in, so we left and just shopped elsewhere.  We sued them.  

38:00  So the judge asked, "You sued them, why did you go back there?"  Use your head a little bit and be rational.  So just because you are right, don't act righteously.  Yes, you're right.  I know they're wrong.  Just be patient.  This might take a few months.  Work gets around.  Just 3 people led 15 people.  Here's where we win guys: identify to the organization the financial risk. It's not about like what you see in the movies, where you win a case and like civil action and the jury finds in your favor, and . . . it's not going to happen.  It doesn't work that way.  Most cases do not end up before a jury, and most cases in this country do not go to trial. Most cases are resolved in summary judgment.  So, you document what's going on.  You get the responsible people.  If there's an issue of trespass, realize where there is a trespass.  It's a trespass to the person if you're being threatened or intimidated by someone with a mask.  It's an irrevocable license if you go into a business that's open to the public.    

39:36  There has to be a violation before there is a trespass.   And what's interesting is that there needs to be 2 witnesses.  A cop would be a witness and the store manager.  If there's a violation, there needs to be a witness.  You don't want to be a witness against yourself.  So by engaging in something that is disruptive, you become a witness [40:00] . . . against yourself.  Why do that, right?  [Oh, God.  Had never put that idea into those terms.  Wow.]  Live your life, go through the process, and if you encounter this, understand what your rights are and document what is happening, and then you can take it to the responsible people.  So the next level would be, you would leave the store.  In a lot of places that are providing services would be like a barber shop . . . it's different than a store because they'll tell me to wear a mask at a store, but I'll ignore them.  I mean I'll go in there to buy my stuff and they deny me services; there are only one or two stores that deny me services.  But in a barber shop, the barber can just say, "I'm not going to cut your hair."  It's not so easy; it's not like I'm just going to pick something off the shelf, right?  So in a case like that, if you really like the place, like my dentist, like Peggy did a great thing with the dentist thing . . . I haven't tried that yet.  You talk to the people rationally, "I already took my temperature, I already talked to the dentist, I'm just going to walk down the hallway . . . I'm not going to wear a mask, I feel it's the mark of the beast, or whatever.  

41:00  [PEGGY]  It's not just about the masks.  The reason we're talking about the masks is that you will be denied entry.  This is a test case, a trial balloon.  And somehow, Sprouts raised its hand, and was selected, or appointed to be the most militant of the retail grocery stores, because some are really easy-going.  I've never been denied in Ralph's.  One sweet little girl was following me around, she looked so scared to tell me.  They're being paid to enforce these unenforceable laws.  [Just as hospitals get incentives from Medicare and Medicaid to record a death as COVID and diagnose the flu as COVID, retailers get paid by the government to enforce illegal rules on its paying customers.  It's bigger than the mask.  It's about freedom.  We have free and equal access to public places, to the courts, to schools, health clinics, hair salons, and dentists.  I'm going through it with our local swimming pool and they want to take your temperature.  

Why do you want to take the temperature?  
We're following the guidelines . . . 
And you know the guidelines aren't law, right?  
Yes, we know, but it's our duty to keep everyone safe.  
Oh, safety!!  I have an idea to make it even more safe!!  You don't want me showing up if I have a fever, do you?  
No, that's why we take your temperature.  
How about if I take my own temperature at home?  And if I have a fever, I won't show up.  Wouldn't it be horrible if someone took my temperature and there I was standing in front of them with a fever?  Breathing on them?       

They don't know what to say.  You caught them on it.  If you want to do this Gustapo safety thing, I will give you safety!  Because I'm relentless like you are John, and I'm never going to give up.  If you say this, I'm going to find that.  If they say do X, I'm going to do X.  One of my adages is that there's always another way, and I'm going to find it.  There's always another way.  If you're afraid about the temperature, then I'll take my own temperature.  No, no, we have to see it.  Well, I will take my own temperature with a thermometer that I bought at CVS.  Because I do not give you permission to undertake a medical intervention.  Now, it is a little tricky at the doctor.  The last time I went to the doctor was about a year ago, they did take my temperature and they also took my blood pressure, because I was at the doctor's office.  That, to me, is not as egregious as going to the dentist.  So I called the dentist and gave them the same schpiel, and they said, "Ah, that totally makes sense."  One of them said, "Why don't you just snap a picture of the temperature reading on your phone and send it in?"  That would be more sanitary if I have to sneeze than a mask would be. [45:39]    

Don't lose your cool.  Don't act righteously even though you're in the right.  Because this is about the long game.  I am astonished that people.  46:30  Got to plan in advance.  Got to know which stores are friendly, which ones are not.  The bigger issue is to not let a business trample over your rights under some pretend banner of "We have the right to refuse service."  Yes, they do but they can refuse you service only if there is an incident.  Don't surrender your rights up freely.  Do not comply.  There is a way to be defiant that will actually serve you.

47:35  

1.  Document what is going on. 

2.  You have an irrevocable license for a place of business.  

3.  There has to be a violation of trespass. 

4.  Don't argue with the cop.  This isn't the place to do it.  

5.  You need 2 witnesses.  


They need it to prosecute a case, but you're never going to get there.  You just want to document everything, and then get out of there.   

The property rights issue we're talking about here is a testing ground to see how many people will give up their rights.  These are property rights, these are not constitutional rights.   You don't have a Constitutional right.  48:22  The Constitution is supposed to restrain government.  We had rights like that before they had written laws.  If we don't stop this, and we don't find those testing grounds, like Sprouts, get them, and put a stop to it now, they're going to conclude that their model is working and all we need to do is spread it out now.  We need to jump on those, and that's why I am doing this.  

48:47  Property Rights.  Okay, this is where most of society is being taxed out of existence.  It's through taxing people's intangible property rights.  An intangible property right is something like deciding what I am going to wear today.  Also, my right for no one to hear a conversation I am having unless I want them to.  That's called a Privacy Right.  Privacy is a property right.  It doesn't come from a law.  It's a human right.  But who defends human rights?  That's why we have all of these written statutes, like the Patients' Bill of Rights.  These are basically telling the insane people, like corporations, right, what rights people already have and what restrictions you have, you insane corporation.  BTW, corporations are defined as insane persons.   

PEGGY, 49:50  Laws are not written to give you rights.  Laws are written to restrict those from violating your rights.  

We're all born with God-given rights.  Property rights [your body] and privacy right [preference for exclusion].  And these other Bill of Rights are there to explain to others clearly so they understand where the line is and they may not violate those rights.  

We're not just trying to cause trouble in society.  There's something else going on here, and we realize that.  Viruses are not contagious between people anyways.  COVID-19 is not a virus; it doesn't exist.  it's never been isolated.  There are no documents on it.  Someone has patented it, I believe this CDC, has patented the genetic material that they modified and they called it COVID-19.  The human body has about 18 Coronaviruses.  The human body makes coronaviruses to clean itself.  They cannot, do not, travel in the air, they're not in a place, you don't have to wipe everything down all the time, don't wash your hands with sanitizers.  Ther's methanol in that; that'll kill you.  About 70 to 90 brands have methanol in them.  That's the other part of this: COVID-19 is not a contagious virus.  and viruses are not contagious between people, bacteria are but not viruses.  A virus is a cleaning agent made by your human body.  It's like saying, "Ooh, we found that everybody has red blood cells."  

52:40 PEGGY  Take away cholesterol, and it induces Alzheimer's.  My dad died at the hands of medical terrorism.  The reason it's important to explain this stuff, friends, is there's a larger agenda at work, and we have to be on our toes, be on our toes about the medicine, about the science, about the social implications, and our focus today is on the legal remedies.  [This is a Florida department] 

53:30  JOHN, We can do this at any place where you're having this problem.  You can do this with anyone.  There is always an intake form for the Department of Health.  Now the Department of Health is behind this scam.  But the Department of Health is supposed to police situations where people who are not authorized or licensed are giving medical advice.  Brief story:  we went to Applebee's the other day, and we couldn't sit down without wearing a mask.  Of course, I'm not going to do that.  I'll never do that, so my wife just called up another Applebee's and we went to the other one and we were fine.  So I do the thing I always do, I ask for the floor managers, but in this case, the guy was the General Manager.  Got him to admit, yeah, you can't wear a mask.  So I documented all that.  So I filed a complaint with the Department of Health on their own form, explaining that there's an employee at AppleBee's restaurant who is requiring patrons to undertake a medical intervention as a condition of patronizing the restaurant.  So I filled out this form and sent it to the DOH, they called me a couple days later to ask "What's up with the complaint at Applebee's?  I said it concerns a restaurant.  She said for that I would have to contact the Department of Business and Professional Regulation [This is a Florida department.]  Well, I already know that.  And I know who I'm supposed to be calling.  Well, actually this concerns Section 456.065, and she goes "Oh, really?"  I said yeah, there's an individual at the store who is imposing medical interventions as a condition for patronizing the restaurant.  And she goes, "Well, we definitely need to see all the facts on that."  So she goes, "Let us review everything and let us get back to you."  So the DOH is behind pushing this, and so is the Department of Business.  They're probably doing that in your state too.  It's not just the DOH, [55:34] they're using other agencies.  And now they're supposed to prevent people from giving medical advice who are not trained and qualified, insured, and licensed and all this stuff.  Do you know why there's licensing?  To get licensing, you're affecting the public.  You don't need a license to cut grass, but you do need a license to advertise to cut grass for someone else because you're open to the public because there's a risk to the public, so licensing allows the government body to regulate it, it also allows insurance carriers to gauge [56:08] their risk.  Because you've succeeded in getting a license, therefore, you must be insurable.  It all works together.  It really works well.  Sometimes, I don't like the licensing issue, it does work pretty well as long as it's not abused.  So when you have someone who is completely not licensed, who would never qualify for a license who's engaging in this, it would be like a person who is playing with fire at a daycare center.  That's how insurance looks at it.  [56:32]  So by filing a complaint with the Department of Health over violations of unlicensed practicing medicine, also denying you informed consent in that situation is another legal violation.  I don't know if it's an "unlicensed to practice medicine," but it is a legal violation in the medical area.  Informed consent requires that you be informed before you are given a chance to consent or not.  So you cannot be informed of a medical procedure unless you've been given all the pertinent information that's available to the physician who is going to consult with you.  You cannot have informed consent unless there's a licensed physician.  So a store manager, a restaurant owner, not going to [cut] do it, so you're already denied informed consent.  Along with the illegal medical intervention.  I mean that's a big issue.  Informed consent, you can slam on that all day long.  It's a big liability.  So now you've got a particular license to engage in, they have permission, to sell a thing to people in general.  But they're engaged in this activity over here where thes another set of licensing that they don't have, and they don't have qualifications.  [57:51] The other issue is that they have no duty, a restaurant has no duty to protect the public.  You want to point that out to them.  This is another item you want to bring up to "the attention of," and you'll see this in the letter.  You bring that to the attention of the Risk Manager, the Chief Counsel for the Organization.  They have no duty to protect the public, but yet they're acting in that capacity.  Moreover, they don't just have zero duty to protect the public, they don't even have the capacity to protect the public.  And that language I am telling you right now comes from case law.  Go see the case law.  This is what judges have been saying for 50 years or a 100 years.  You have to have a duty to protect the public.  You have to have the capacity to protect the public.  That means you have to have the funding, the training, the equipment, and you have to be insured really.  The qualifications to engage in that activity.  If I saw a fire in my neighborhood, I couldn't just go over there and start putting it out . . . I mean I probably could but I really shouldn't.  I'm not qualified.  I don't understand all that stuff.  I'm not a fireman, so . . . that's why we have these restrictions.  Even if there was a pandemic, the law is still the same.  It doesn't repeal laws.  See, they have a problem.  You have the Dept of Health which is supposed to police the unlicensed practice of medicine yet they're pushing the unlicensed practice of medicine.  [59:16] We need to follow many, many complaints.  Because here's what happens.  You have an insurance liability for the one who is doing it for the entire business on that property, again, it's like a slip and fall, maybe a little bit worse.  But then you have a liability for your county and your state, probably your city, because they have a liability for pushing this.  They're part of it.  And I don't know what that liability is yet, but we're going to talk about how to address that too.  [59:47]  Okay, so now you have a Civil Liability where you get into the issue of  . . . religious convictions where you cannot be denied services because of a religious convictions.  You can't be denied services because of a disability if you're in a wheelchair, whatever.  So we all know that.  You have your different state laws.  And, of course, they're actionable.  There's a private right of action, which means you can sue under that particular statute, like in California like Peggy is talking about.  It's California Civil Code 51.  We have one here, it's Florida Statute 760, almost word for word.  And you can sue under that.  The way you sue though is that you don't just sue somebody.  You have to document it and then you have to try to work it out.  So you got to send them a letter, and tell them, "Hey guys, you messed up.  I'll give you a chance to fix it, let's work this out."  [100:35]  But you also need to send a letter to the administrative agency that is supposed to oversee this type of violation.  Normally, it'll be the Human Rights Commission, and you'll see my example here in these notes.  So there's a letter here . . . I didn't do a screenshot.  Like in the Sprouts example, we can bring in the state's . . . .  Page 5.  The subject of the letter is "Complaint for Unlawful Discrimination."  If you state your case properly, you're probably going to get the remedy you want without going to court.  They don't want to go to court.  I mean they don't want to go to court any more than you do.  It's expensive.  For them, it's really expensive.  If you go to court by yourself, you might pay like $500 in filing fees over a period of a year.  For those guys, it's literally like $50,000.  And as much as I don't like to, sometimes I win just because of the cost of litigation, and I would really like to win on the merits of the case.  But this will work in our favor, so you present it like this.  Here's my general statement here.  I went and got their own policy.  I copied the pertinent sections.  [102:15]  I printed every single page and put it in a binder.  If you have to do this, let's do this, right?  It was fun.  It was empowering.  I'd go in there with a binder.  The store manager runs over.  We had this conversation.  I said okay, "So you guys have a policy about mask-wearing?  He goes "Yeah."  I said, "Can you show me which page it is?"  It's like he couldn't believe I had . . . you know.  So he goes, "It's not in there."  So I said, "Can I see your updated one?" So he comes back with a piece of paper.  He's waving a piece of paper.  In black and white it says, "All Customers Must Wear a Mask."  I have to take it at face value.  So then I asked him, "This says that.  This is your policy.  This part of your policy says that you have to respect these issues, which are here."  Of course, he didn't respond to that; I didn't want to argue with the guy.  Why not bring a case against them, not for violating your civil rights, I mean we all know you have civil rights and stuff like that.  But why not get an injunction against them for something that they already admit to?  Why not bring a case where there really shouldn't be a dispute once the store sees the case and the case is I am suing you so that you all have to comply with your own policy?  So what are they going to say, "That's not our policy.  It's secret?" If you have a secret policy, that's not a store policy.  It has to be public because you're open to the public.  Just like the vaccine court.  Or the FISA Court.  Those are not courts even though they call them courts.  It's because they're secret.  There's no such thing as a secret court.  So there's no such thing as an unwritten or secret policy when it comes to issues from public business.  So when you sue them for an injunction against violating their own policy that incorporates all the laws they're supposed to follow, it makes it into one single issue which allows you the chance to win on summary judgment.  A Siummary Judgment says to the judge, "Hey Judge, you knliow what?  They've already admitted they have this certain policy, they've already admitted that thy've violated it, so I just want a sumary judgment because there's no controversy here."  

[104:47]  To confirm, John, an Injunction means that they will stop doing this action.  That's what an injunction is.  

[104:52]  Yeah, it enjoins them from breaking their own policy, they've violated their own policy, so the court would order them to comply with their own policy.  And don't ask for money.  I mean you can, but I would recommend not.  I don't think you should.  I just think that you should get Equitable Relief, which is an injuction.  And I think you can do it within 90 days.  We'll see.  I'am about to file one against Sprouts.  Is that the one where you brought your own handbook?  Yeah.  I told them, "Hey, I'll meet you down there on Monday, I want to document eerything."  I thought we were going to get out of there with our groceries.  I thought I was going to get some black cherry juice stuff and other things.  Now we have a perfect case.  We've got all the facts, and the case is basically what you're seeing here.   

[106:22]  You have the Human Rights Commission, or whatever it is in your state.  Send your letter there.  Articulate the thing.  Use my letter.  Use the language.  That is what you do when you send the company the pre-suit medication notice.  The note that says, "Hey, I was just at your store.  You did this thing.  It was wrong I thought.  And I'm sending you this letter to see if you can work this out.  And send it to the Chief Counsel and send it to the store manager.  Then send your report to the Department of Health, and send a letter to the Human Rights Commission, your state agency.  My recommendation on that is that you DON'T let the Chief Counsel of the organization, or the store manager, know that you're complaining to the State, like the Department of Health.  Don't let them know that because I think that it's in your interest that you want them to make a decision quickly.   And if they see that you've sent a letter to a state agency, the attorney might just say, "I"m going to wait and see what happens there," because a lot of them are afraid to make a decision.  So I want them to make a decision as soon as possible and in the background, I'm going to file these complaints where I can these letters, okay?  

BUSINESSES MEASURING OXYGEN LEVELS?  [107:25] The other health issue is that and it has been demonstrated [and you guys can look for this through the internet] you'll see where people have been measuring the oxygen levels and the mask-wearing.  There's a letter back from 2007, that was sent to OSHA, and an enforcement officer was talking about the science behind a particular regulation that I mention here.  This is an OSHA reg that covers the process by which an employer would make an employer or organization would make someone wear a mask on site.  29CFR.1910.134.  Certain precautions that have to be taken.  A physician has to be involved.  The person being told to wear a mask has to give his consent.  Even then you still can't make someone wear a mask.  

[108:17]  Peggy:  They're testing us.  They're seeing that people are compliant.  They're doubling down.  It's like California is one of the test states for the nation, like Hawaii is, New York, and others.  The other thing is they want to see . . . they have all of this written down, too.  They've told us that they're going to use test cases.  That they're going to say who is compliant and who is going to push back and all of that is in writing.  And the beauty of this is even with all of these regulations, and California is the leader in regulations, is you've made the bed.  You've given us all of this.  And your idea of filing the violations with the Health Department is brilliant because they are the very ones who are supposedly giving out the guidelines, and I believe that some of these health officers are going to start back peddling or they're resigning.  We've seen many of the Department of Health Directors resign in California.  I think it was Ohio, Connecticut, Oregon, and Colorado.  They've been falling like dominoes. And Healthy Americans, helps me, how many state and county health officers in your state have resigned or have just been appointed?  Many of these . . . when they realize they're placeholders, they don't want to go to prison.     

[110:00]  These guys are going down.  I just reported every member of my City Council for disaster fraud. 

[110:00]  All of these documents Peggy has at the Healthy American.  These are the tools you're going to use going forward: you're going to use them against vaccination, you're going to use them against contact tracing, you're going to use it against testing, you're going to use it at your workplace.  What about the courts who require you  to wear a mask inside the courtroom?  Understand property rights, privacy rights, irrevocable rights, and places of public accommodation.  

[112:30]  The Chief Judge is the person responsible for the courthouse.  And you want to in advance send a letter to the Chief Judge and let him know that he is accepting liability and responsibility, and that I have a whole list of things that he's going to be liable for.  You just put him on notice.  You don't need his consent at all.  You just tell him.  

[112:55] This is the OSHA regs.  29CFR.1910.134.  OSHA spent decades, since the 1970s, studying the science behind keeping workers safe mostly. And that has to do with wearing equipment that restricts air flow or oxygen. 

[113:10] Immediately when you put a mask on, it violates OSHA Safety Regulation the moment you put it on .  And the longer you keep it on, you increase the chance of you getting bacterial infections, like pleursy Legionairre's Disease and Streptococcus.  You're goint to see a lot of people with welts and infeections on their face.  This in itself is a safety violation.  Imagine if you file a copmlant with the DOH for them to puportedly requiring them to violate healtha nd safety laws and theyre in charge of health and safety, who's above the Department of Health?  More than likely it's going to be your State Attorney Gernal's office, and that's the person who prosecutes people for crimes.  That's the person who would prosecute somebody for dumpring toxic waste or polluting the water, you know, things like that.  So your next step up is the AG's office.  You need to document what's going on and you need to notify the DOH.  I mean all of us on this call could file 10 of these this week.  Just go to DOH, look for "Unlicensed Practice of Medicine," download the form, fill it out . . . .  Mail it in.  Just flood them with it.  

[114:36]  Peggy:  And that's going to go agaisnt Sprouts, the swimming pool manager, local hair salon, your dentist, mechanic, We're trying to get the Dept. of Health to stop breathing down your neck.  

How to Sue Sprouts or Other Businesses.  This is the only way to get businesses to abide by the law, by your civil rights, and maintain some civility in society.  Sad but these companies commit terrible acts.  

LETTERS

Notice of Discrimination. 

To start the preliminary documentation and preliminary notifications to a company, start with these letters.  

Discriminated against?  It can happen to the best of us.  See Item #3 here. 

Okay, when it comes to defending your civil rights, what you're doing is relying on the federal code 1964 U.S. Civil Rights law. 

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is federal civil rights legislation that prohibits discrimination in numerous settings including employment, education, voting, and public accommodations.

“SEC. 201. (a) All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.

See if this advances your understanding, your actions, and your strategy.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)