CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: Pregnant women were not a part of the original COVID vaccine clinical trials, yet millions of pregnant women were encouraged to get vaccinated.

Just like with every vaccine recommended to pregnant women. No carcinogenicity or teratogenicity studies done and they are left out of the original trials. Then later because so many shots are given, they deem it safe. https://t.co/p1g683r543

— Dr Suzanne Humphries (@DrSuzanneH7) August 13, 2026

MARY HOLLAND:🔥"The PREP Act, it...displants all law, and that can't be right...we absolutely have to get rid of the PREP Act. We have to get rid of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and we have to restore true prior free and informed consent."

🔥"The PREP Act, it...displants all law, and that can't be right...we absolutely have to get rid of the PREP Act. We have to get rid of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and we have to restore true prior free and informed consent." (1/2)

Children's Health Defense… pic.twitter.com/UvdrXMMlC4

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) September 29, 2024

"The PREP Act, it...displants all law, and that can't be right...we absolutely have to get rid of the PREP Act. We have to get rid of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and we have to restore true prior free and informed consent." (1/2) Children's Health Defense CEO Mary Holland (@maryhollandnyc) describes for retired pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas how the PREP Act—which provides immunity from liability, except for willful misconduct, for entities involved in the development, manufacturing, distribution, and administration of medical countermeasures during a public health emergency declared by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service—must be repealed. "The PREP Act, it...displants all law, and that can't be right...we absolutely have to get rid of the PREP Act," Holland says. She notes that the latest wildly egregious usage of PREP Act cover occurred in Vermont, where the state's supreme court ruled that the Windham Southeast Supervisory Union that oversees the public school system was immune from legal challenges brought by parents of a child who was "accidentally" given a COVID injection. See the story link in tweet two. Furthermore, Holland says that "We have to get rid of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and we have to restore true prior free and informed consent." Partial transcription of clip: "A terrible decision just came down from the Vermont Supreme Court that in a case where parents, said that they didn't want their child to get a COVID shot, but the COVID shot was given anyway at school. The case that the court dismissed it, saying, "Well, it's the PREP Act." The PREP Act, it suggests that it displants all law, and that can't be right. And that's one of the things it's a stepping stone in that fight against the PREP Act. But we absolutely have to get rid of the PREP Act. We have to get rid of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and we have to restore true prior free and informed consent. People need to be able to make their own health decisions on an individual basis. "We are not all the same. The idea that everybody gets the same I mean, so crazy, It's so at odds with everything else in medicine. Right? What's your weight? 

What's your height? What's your What's your medical history? That's normal medicine or used to be normal. And then they come out with a chemical that's in a bottle that you can't test, and they wanna have it be one size fits all. It's absurd." 

Story Link. 

Complete interview with Dr. Paul Thomas and Mary Holland.

"In the women aged 20 to 24 who were in the clinical trials who did get pregnant, they had a spontaneous miscarriage rate... of 25%. That's a staggeringly high rate. A background rate in the U.S. it's 10-15%." For Gardisil 9 [the Gardisil shot made for nine to 45 year-olds] it was 27.4%

"Even in the clinical trials [for the HPV jab]... some [women] did get pregnant, their miscarriage rates were staggeringly higher than what are considered the background rates... For Gardisil 9 [the jab made for 9 to 45YOs] it was 27.4%."

President of Children's Health Defense… pic.twitter.com/ZJlNJR6vmi

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) December 15, 2023

NEVRADAKIS, 11:46.  Michael because you're involved in a lot of these lawsuits that are currently in progress against Merck which is the pharmaceutical company that produces Gardasil before we talk about where these lawsuits are at the moment, and there are a lot of them that have already been completed, settlements and payouts.  You've dug into the numbers you've looked at the evidence what data have you found in terms of the number of injuries deaths Adverse Events connected to Gardasil 9 in the United States and worldwide.

BAUM, 12:26.  The first thing I'd start with is we've done most of our research on the Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome and premature ovarian failure.  For both of those, if you do an analysis of the reporting of Adverse Events over time and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, there is about a 20 times greater rate of POTS, Postural Orthostatic  Tachycardia Syndrome, compared to all other vaccines over time.  So it means it's got more POTS than any of these other vaccines EVER.  Very similar with the premature ovarian failure it's up to 50 times greater rate premature ovarian failure or premature ovarian insufficiency among girls that were given Gardasil.