Showing posts with label Stephanie Weidle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephanie Weidle. Show all posts

Sunday, April 27, 2025

SASHA LATYPOVA: most high profile law firms or any large corporate law firm even mid-size they are all conflicted they all work for the federal government and most of them work for the Department of Defense


9:58.  So I wondered between 2022, as I kept working on it, I kept writing about it, and April of 2022, I sent the information, because the reader suggested that I send it, I sent it to Aaron Siri.  I got no response from him.  I got a cursory response from Elizabeth Frame, who is one of his colleagues and then I didn't hear anything else. And by the middle of 2023, I came to the conclusion that they weren't talking about it either because they were totally in support of the overthrow, and they just want to get their piece of the financial whatever money is to be made in the process of continuing to fool people into thinking that the constitution is still operative, they wanted to get their piece.  Or they were so terrified by the implications of what it was and thought that there was nothing beneficial to be done, so they didn't even try.  They didn't speak up.  They didn't file cases.  They didn't, they just thought close your eyes, put your head in the sand, keep your mouth shut because this is too big and not to talk about it.  So those are my two guesses at this point about why the legal profession to whatever extent you can think of it as a monolithic thing, most of the prominent legal firms do not talk about this and I think that's why.

11:24.  In addition to that most high profile law firms or any large corporate law firm even mid-size they are all conflicted they all work for the federal government and most of them work for the Department of Defense, too, and they will not take these cases because the Department of Defense is behind this separation.  Also, besides being conflicted, even the individual practitioners will for the small individual practitioners, money, access to money and funding these cases is the first thing that comes to mind to prevent them from taking them because they see it and they're like you know there's no way I can raise so much money.  This takes hundreds of thousands of dollars and some cases might take millions of dollars to prosecute.  So they look at it, and say no way.  Large legal firms that have resources are conflicted and finally everyone is incentivized to ignore the Prep Act on both sides.  I just published an article this morning about 25 States, or 23 States and two governors, suing HHS and Kennedy for clawbacks of the COVID pandemic. 

Saturday, April 26, 2025

SASHA LATYPOVA: Masking induces acidosis within 30 minutes, and that triggers positives for PCR. So the numbers of COVID PCRs went up to give the impression that the pandemic was real

This clip of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova () is taken from a recently posted interview with Feds for Freedom (@feds4freedomusa).

Do you know why they were so set on masking?  They were so, you know, masking was like one of the most important pillars of this whole thing because we just now, we're just now finding out from another collaborator who is working on identifying all these PCR tests, and so forth.  So masking induces acidosis because you are re-inhaling your own CO2.  In fact, it induces acidosis within like 30 minutes of masking.  You re-inhale your own CO2, and depending on your own health status and vulnerability, age, and so forth, and it's more prevalent in children and in the elderly.  You are going to get dehydrated and you're going to get acidified, and your mouth and nose are going to get acidified, and that triggers positives for PCR.  That's, that's the thing that PCR measures is acidity levels.  So that's how they were getting the, that was their mechanism to . . . and it also can trigger, you know, in a vulnerable state and during winter for some people, it can trigger the cold.  So actually it is the mechanism to induce common cold and also to undo it.  It is to de-acidify quickly.  So that's a demonstrated in clinical studies.  And so they knew it, and that was the mechanism to make people sick and also trigger false positives for those people who were not sick.

Full interview.  Feds for Freedom.

Tuesday, September 3, 2024

STEPHANIE WEIDLE: I don't trust, support, or respect the senior leaders of the military anymore...I think as time progressed over and over and over again, I witnessed some of the most unethical, hypocritical, and really disappointing decision-making on the part of senior leaders

🚨U.S. Army Captain Says U.S. Military Leadership Is Lying About Military's Readiness; Leadership Claims It's 90% Ready But Is Only 65% Ready🚨 Rebecca Tummers (), a Captain in the U.S. Army, describes for Stephanie Weidle () on a Feds for Freedom () podcast how U.S. military leadership is lying to Congress about its readiness. Tummers, who was injured by the COVID injection, notes that she no longer "trusts, supports, or respects the senior leaders of the military." "I've seen them lie about personnel readiness. I've seen them lie about equipment readiness," Tummers says. "They say we're 90% ready, and we're sitting at about 65% readiness at any given point. And that goes the same for our equipment." Partial transcription of clip: "I don't trust, support, or respect the senior leaders of the military anymore...I think as time progressed over and over and over again, I witnessed some of the most unethical, hypocritical, and really disappointing decision-making on the part of senior leaders. And, I mean, the COVID shot was part of that, the mandate was part of that, nobody standing up for anybody or at least making sure people didn't get kicked out. That was part of it, but there were tons of other instances of, you know, watching fraud, waste, and abuse, watching people do some pretty self-serving things, watching people lie. and they were in positions, you know, where their decisions meant life or death for people and they lied. "I've seen them lie about personnel readiness. I've seen them lie about equipment readiness. Anytime there's a CTC rotation, these, you know, brigade commanders and division commanders are touting to Congress that we're 90% ready, that 90% of our personnel are deployable right now, and it's a lie. It's maybe hovering around 65, 70%, but they will say and they'll drag all these people down there that are non-deployable. They'll drag them down to GRTC, and get them the attendance. As soon as the attendance is taken by FORSCOM, [1973-Present], they send all of those kids who never should have been down there back home.

"They say we're 90% ready, and we're sitting at about 65% readiness at any given point. And that goes the same for our equipment. We regularly oversell how ready we are on an equipment perspective, and you just get tired of the lies. And people are lying to kind of get a good eval pin on their next rank, and nobody's willing to stand up and say this is not true. All of these brigade commanders, all of these division commanders, are aligned. We're not 90% ready. We're 65% ready, but no commander is willing to say that because that means that they will not get promoted." 

The complete interview:

Thursday, August 29, 2024

JAMES LYONS-WEILER: autism...it often involves an autoimmune reaction...but it's simply the body's intolerance of toxins and the brain becomes overwhelmed

"Adults who were exposed to too much mercury because they ate fish from the Bay of Minamata... They started hand-flapping, they stopped talking...we call that mercury poisoning over [there], but if you poison a kid with mercury to their toxic level of tolerance, it's autism."

Scientist, CEO, author, and human rights advocate James Lyons-Weiler () describes for Stephanie Weidle (@ActiveSinger24) on a Feds for Freedom () podcast about how autism is caused by "a long list" of environmental toxins, which he refers to as "autismogens." "Like there are many carcinogens, there are many autismogens," Lyons-Weiler says. "These autismogens include any number of organic pollutants [including] mercury of both types." The scientist highlights the Minamata disaster in Japan, which saw citizens in the 1950s, in the city of Minamata, Kumamoto Prefecture, fall prey to mercury poisoning following the release of methylmercury into the ocean from industrial wastewater from a chemical factory. The methylmercury bioaccumulated in shellfish and when citizens subsequently ate them, they were poisoned. "Adults that were exposed to too much mercury because they ate fish from the Bay of Minamata after the Minamata disaster...[they] stopped making eye contact. They started hand-flapping, and they stopped talking, it's a one-to-one correspondence. We just call that mercury poisoning over here. But if you poison a kid with mercury to their toxic level of tolerance, it's autism, if it's mercury-based." Partial transcription of clip: "All of the literature up to 2015 showed environmental toxins that are associated with autism. It's a long list. "Like there are many carcinogens, there are many autismogens. These autismogens include any number of organic pollutants. They include mercury of both types. And proof of this is the Minamata disaster in Japan. Adults that were exposed to too much mercury because they ate fish from the Bay of Minamata after the Minamata disaster, [and] well, let's go through the symptoms of autism: you stop making eye contact; you can't speak; you lose the ability to speak; you don't interact with people socially; you act like they're not there in the room If it's severe, you might hand flap and do repetitive motions. "Anybody can identify a kid with autism that way or an adult. The adults that were exposed to high levels of mercury stopped making eye contact. They started hand flapping, and they stopped talking, it's a one-to-one correspondence. We just call that mercury poisoning over here. But if you poison a kid with mercury to their toxic level of tolerance, it's autism, if it's mercury-based.

The reference to Dr. Russel Blaylock's Chronic Microglial Activation.
So autism...it often involves an autoimmune reaction...but it's simply the body's intolerance of toxins and the brain becomes overwhelmed, can't do the things that the brain needs to do. "What happens in the brain if a brain cell dies due to the toxins that are present of any kind, it actually activates, it sends out cytokines that activate microglial cells, which are the scavengers and the immune cells of our brain. And those microglial cells will pick up the cellular debris and clean it up. They also do pruning of the brain during neurodevelopment and they have two roles. They're the trash collectors of the brain and they prune the brain for neurodevelopment. Well, if you fill the brain with toxins to the point where these microglia are so busy taking out the trash all day long, they can't build the brain properly. So we have altered neurodevelopment due to toxins. "So please, let's stop with, okay, for the greater good, you're taking on risks for to protect other kids, and what about these kids? What about these kids' rights to live in a world free from the ravages of pharmaceutical toxins to save some other kid from a mild childhood illness. That's where the balance of ethics should be and we need to revisit that as a society.