SASHA LATYPOVA: most high profile law firms or any large corporate law firm even mid-size they are all conflicted they all work for the federal government and most of them work for the Department of Defense

9:58.  So I wondered between 2022, as I kept working on it, I kept writing about it, and April of 2022, I sent the information, because the reader suggested that I send it, I sent it to Aaron Siri.  I got no response from him.  I got a cursory response from Elizabeth Frame, who is one of his colleagues and then I didn't hear anything else. And by the middle of 2023, I came to the conclusion that they weren't talking about it either because they were totally in support of the overthrow, and they just want to get their piece of the financial whatever money is to be made in the process of continuing to fool people into thinking that the constitution is still operative, they wanted to get their piece.  Or they were so terrified by the implications of what it was and thought that there was nothing beneficial to be done, so they didn't even try.  They didn't speak up.  They didn't file cases.  They didn't, they just thought close your eyes, put your head in the sand, keep your mouth shut because this is too big and not to talk about it.  So those are my two guesses at this point about why the legal profession to whatever extent you can think of it as a monolithic thing, most of the prominent legal firms do not talk about this and I think that's why.

11:24.  In addition to that most high profile law firms or any large corporate law firm even mid-size they are all conflicted they all work for the federal government and most of them work for the Department of Defense, too, and they will not take these cases because the Department of Defense is behind this separation.  Also, besides being conflicted, even the individual practitioners will for the small individual practitioners, money, access to money and funding these cases is the first thing that comes to mind to prevent them from taking them because they see it and they're like you know there's no way I can raise so much money.  This takes hundreds of thousands of dollars and some cases might take millions of dollars to prosecute.  So they look at it, and say no way.  Large legal firms that have resources are conflicted and finally everyone is incentivized to ignore the Prep Act on both sides.  I just published an article this morning about 25 States, or 23 States and two governors, suing HHS and Kennedy for clawbacks of the COVID pandemic. 

This is a genocide – it’s an intended one, the plan has been around for a long time. I’m sure you’re a student of the agenda for the 21st century. It has 3 primary goals.  The elimination of private property rights, that’s called communism. The elimination of borders, that’s called loss of sovereignty- and last, a massive depopulation of the planet. All 3 of those things are being accomplished by this same operation, and it is a genocide.  --Attorney Todd Callender, 2022

Everyone needs to learn and accept that the United States is under a medical martial law that was just extended to 2029

If you don't see the real problem, you'll never find the right solution. Atty and human rights defender Todd Callender explains @VaxxCHOICE pic.twitter.com/aA6syDC0Dg

— DR JANE RUBY™️ (@RealDrJaneRuby) March 27, 2025

Constitutional rights are being suspended.  President Trump declared a National Emergency [its reach and limits] on 13 March 2020.  When he did that, it had the effect of consolidating power into the Executive Branch of the government.  And when the public health emergency was declared, COVID-19 became a military operation.  So the reason why all of our [legal] cases got dismissed out, all of our federal cases related to COVID-19 got dismissed.  Why?  Because the courts said we're not going to hear your case because the military is prosecuting a war.  We're not going to second guess them in the middle of a war.  That's not exactly what they said, but this was the conclusion we had to draw.  The same applies here.  The courts are saying, "Well, there was a national emergency declared.  There was a public health emergency declared.  We're not sure that we even have jurisdiction to hear this case."  And so this is the point.  The Executive Branch is operating as a dictatorship, because they were given the power to do that with the Declaration of the National Emergency, followed by the public health emergency.  It's medical martial law.  What people don't understand is that all the power of our government rests actually in the Department of Defense, which is now, by the way, effectively the private army of the W.H.O.  It's a war on Humanity, and what they've done is they've hired or engaged the world's biggest, most lethal killing machine, otherwise known as the U.S. DoD, to be their thugs, to be there enforcement.

LATYPOVA: there is such a category of premeditated murder called depraved indifference—it's when you knowingly inflict harm

🚨"[T]he Department of Defense was...fake relabeling and substituting smaller batches...within a million-dose batch...they would throw in 30,000 doses of relabeled [jabs]...So that could be introduction of more toxic, smaller lots into larger lots and relabeling them."

Retired… pic.twitter.com/GU8pxzk57h

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) May 11, 2024

[T]he Department of Defense was...fake relabeling and substituting smaller batches...within a million-dose batch...they would throw in 30,000 doses of re-labeled [jabs]...So that could be the introduction of more toxic, smaller lots into larger lots and relabeling them."

Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for James Delingpole (@JMCDelingpole) how the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) has "fake relabeled" COVID-19 injection batches and included them in much larger batches. Latypova notes that these batches may be "more toxic" than the rest of the batches in which they're included.

"[W]ith these poisons...there were many instances of clusters of deaths...and we just don't know what particular toxicity means, it could mean there are more deadly ingredients," Latypova says, referring to the variance in toxicity between COVID injection batches. The pharma exec notes that Craig Paardekooper, a pharmaceutical sciences student at Kingston University in England, "identified, at least in Europe, it was the freshness of it [the COVID injection vials]" that determined toxicity level.

"So Belgium was kind of like, a ground zero, it was highest toxicity in Belgium, because the plant is in Belgium. And then as you move away from Belgium, you have lower and lower [toxicity]," Latypova says. She notes succinctly: "If it's fresh, it's definitely deadly."

Perhaps most alarmingly, Latypova notes that she and her colleagues "found that the Department of Defense was also fake re-labeling and substituting smaller batches." She explains that "within a million-dose batch, they would throw in 30,000 doses of re-labeled [jabs], God knows where it's coming from, so they were doing that too. So that could be introduction of more toxic, smaller lots into larger lots and relabeling them."

"Nobody got prosecuted for this," Latypova adds.

"At this point, I call it murder," the retired pharma executive says. "I call it premeditated murder because there is such a category of premeditated murder called depraved indifference—it's when you knowingly inflict harm. And now we have them for several years, knowing that these products cause excessive death, and injury, and all they do is deny and continue. Deny and continue. So it is a premeditated murder."