Pretty good video exposing how the media has been weaponized against Whites (Americans). It is about 12 minutes long.
— Mofobian (@Mofobian) April 11, 2026
Try to watch at least 5 minutes to understand what it is explaining. It leads up to Marxism, and it uses black individuals as a prop to criminalize Whites at… pic.twitter.com/FCyZR7jvgA
Food Remedies
Traditional cultures prioritised fat above protein for a reason. --Sama Hoole
Saturday, April 11, 2026
MOFOBIAN: It leads to Marxism, and it uses black individuals as a prop to criminalize Whites at Obama rallies by showing their weapons and not their faces.
The Reform Party
If you were ever tempted to vote Reform, this will cure you. pic.twitter.com/5zUI3ydsko
— Jared Taylor (@RealJarTaylor) April 11, 2026
DR. ANTHONY CHAFFEE: they were actually measuring a bunch of Native Americans on the Great Plains, and these guys were largely meat eaters . . . the tallest human beings alive on earth at the time.
"Tallest in the World: Native Americans of the Great Plains in the Nineteenth Century," Richard H. Steckel and Joseph M. Prince, 2001.
They were the tallest human beings alive on earth at the time. There's a study in 2001 called tallest in the world, and they looked at original source data where they were actually measuring a bunch of Native Americans on the Great Plains, and these guys were largely meat eaters. They were eating buffalo year-round. They were the tallest human beings alive on Earth at the time. The really interesting part of that study was says very clearly that the young men were the shortest in the entire tribe. The fathers were taller. Grandfathers were even taller. If we did the study 100 years ago, this would be way different, this average height would be well above 6 ft tall. And when the study was done, when those measurements were done, was after the bison were wiped out and they were put on reservations. So that was that transition period. You saw it in three generations.
JORDAN PETERSON: No, you should be capable of it, but that doesn't mean you should use it. "Those who have swords and know how to use them but keep them sheathed will inherit the world."
Competent and dangerous? Why dangerous?
Because it's the alternative to being weak and weak is not good.
By dangerous that implies I should be ready to threaten someone to hurt somebody.
No, you should be capable of it, but that doesn't mean you should use it. "Those who have swords and know how to use them but keep them she will inherit the world." That's a way better way of thinking about it. There's nothing to you otherwise. If you're not a formidable force, there's no morality In yourself control. If you're incapable of violence, not being violent isn't a virtue. Capacity for danger and the capacity for control is what brings about the virtue. Otherwise, you confuse weakness with moral virtue. I'm harmless, therefore I'm good. No, that isn't how it works at all. If you're harmless, you're just weak, and if you're weak you're not going to be good. You can't be because it takes strength to be good. It's very difficult to be good.
CAMUS: Two patients got a poop transplant for C. diff… and suddenly started growing hair again.
Two patients got a poop transplant for C. diff… and suddenly started growing hair again.
— Camus (@newstart_2024) April 11, 2026
That unexpected result hooked Dr. Sabine Hazan.
She saw alopecia areata disappear after fecal transplants from healthy donors — and in other cases, it appeared. So she started digging: is… pic.twitter.com/K14R4r3CpQ
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)