DAVID FRIEDBERG: there is nothing illegal or fraudulent going on. In fact, the system is operating exactly as intended it has been set up, structured anyway that with the right construct you can get an individual appointed, not elected, but appointed to a particular role in government under a "free election" in California.

🚨 Friedberg on Los Angeles ‘Elections’

“Your rights to have an election are gone. You are a citizen of those who tell you who your overseers are … So enjoy the ones that have been made appointed by those who have constructed the matrix.” pic.twitter.com/6lBAE22UJv

— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) June 13, 2026

David Friedberg leads this discussion.

2:03.  And, Nick if you'll just pull up the map which is I think worth taking a look at, basically the concentrations of incremental votes that Nithya Raman got came around the Skid Row area in Los Angeles.  And look I'm not an election denier.  I'm not someone who's historically believed the idea that elections are fraud and people have stolen votes. But when you look at the basic statistics of what happened in-person, mail-in before and after Election Day, it becomes a real statistical quagmire on how did this sort of social political shift happen in such a way that it did?

Los Angeles Voter fraud EXPOSED

Skid row denizen admits she was paid $5 to vote for Karen Bass ..

Says they come multiple times a week to get people to vote for Bass or Raman ! @USAttyEssayli …

Video from https://t.co/JvBLzInCFy pic.twitter.com/rLzDBn2Lxc

— Make L.A. Great Again 🇺🇸 (@lalovestrump) June 9, 2026

Friedberg continues, 

Now, there was a report published, Nick, if you could pull this up, by the US House of Representatives Committee on House Administration.  This was published in May of 2020 and they highlighted the 2018 California midterm elections and the challenges they saw arise in that midterm elections because of some of the legislative changes that were made.  First, California Assembly Bill 1921 legalized the practice of unlimited ballot harvesting in the state this was passed around 2018 around the midterms is that any individual has the right to go and collect ballots from any other individuals regardless of relationship, fill them out, and send them in. California 2 years later, 18 months later also passed a law that made it permanent that every person registered in the state of California would get a ballot.  So tens of millions of ballots then get mailed out.  Then there was another series of laws that were passed that said anyone can register to vote.  You don't need to prove your citizenship.  You can use a gym membership card as an example.  So anyone can register to vote. There is no proof of ID when you get a ballot.  There is no demonstration at the person who fills out has anything to do with the individual who is supposed to be voting that ballot.  And it is legal for an individual to go out and collect hundreds or thousands of ballots, ship them in, and they will all qualify in these kind of mail-in ballot voting procedures. So there is nothing illegal or fraudulent going on in fact the system is operating exactly as intended it has been set up, structured anyway that with the right construct you can get an individual appointed Not Elected but appointed to a particular role in government under a "free election" in California.  This is a foundational destruction of our rights to vote for people in a free democracy I feel it's been eroded slowly over time to such an extent now and I'm not some crazy MAGA mfer or whatever people want to classify me as for pointing this out but you can go down the list they are all written out in this document every one of these laws that were passed in California overtime that in aggregate create the environment and the construction for elections to become appointments and no longer free Democratic elections where the principal very importantly the principal should be: one individual, one vote.  And if you opt to not vote, your vote should not be counted.  So I think that there is no fraud yeah I think this is not the way the laws are set up. 

GB UKJ0N GB: Following the horrific stabbing of a 17-year-old girl in Brierfield. Alex Phillips has a powerful message for Keir Starmer.

They will deploy the Army against the population that continues to object to their own destruction.  There will be no voting their way out of this, our Gov'ts won't let us.  Folks should embrace the horror and get to work. --Linuxhippie

Following the horrific stabbing of a 17-year-old girl in Brierfield.

Alex Phillips has a powerful message for Keir Starmer.

Well said.@ThatAlexWoman @talktv pic.twitter.com/4xeuwXgztp

LINUXHIPPIE: Next up, they will deploy the Army against the population that continues to object to their own destruction. There will be no voting their way out of this, our Gov'ts won't let us. Folks should embrace the horror and get to work.

7 min interview w/ former head of MI5. No mention of immigration, no mention of Marxism, no mention of Islam.

Neither mention foreigners that the British Gov't imported to do exactly what those foreigners ARE doing to British Subjects.

It's always the external threat. Does… https://t.co/qnzP4oCJDM pic.twitter.com/Fz4QrrtN9v

— Linuxhippie (@linuxhippie) June 13, 2026

7 min interview w/ former head of MI5. No mention of immigration, no mention of Marxism, no mention of Islam. Neither mention foreigners that the British Gov't imported to do exactly what those foreigners ARE doing to British Subjects. It's always the external threat. Does not mention the obvious "ongoing" threat to the British people from their own leadership that has "prioritized" the replacement of British subjects with Islam. Reduces current leadership to the level of "student activists" (completely under-inclusive to the threat they are) and refers to this a "left wing of the Labour Party" dispute (as if the entire Labour isn't Marxist). This is the UK Counter-State completing the opposite side of the dialectic. Close the circle to churn the British population into non-existence. He knows exactly what he's doing and his language was carefully chosen (al la Discourse Theory praxis) to close the circle of allowable opinion in order to paint those citizens who seek to defend themselves from annihilation by their own Gov't as "extreme". Next up, they will deploy the Army against the population that continues to object to their own destruction. Remember the SPLC case? It's happening in the Ireland / UK right now. If the people don't commit, go all in, they will be crushed and doomed to the fate their King has set for them. There will be no voting their way out of this, our Gov'ts won't let us. Folks should embrace the horror and get to work. US Politicians do the same thing see slides below.

MJ MURPHY: That's the technique because most arguments aren't actually arguments, they're collisions. They're collisions between different definitions.

The Most Powerful Debate Technique pic.twitter.com/HBTJjats7o

— MJ Murphy (@hothingsgirlsay) June 13, 2026

I have spent years studying psychology, NLP, persuasion, influence, and the most powerful debate technique I have ever found isn't it a comeback, it isn't a fact, it isn't an argument.  It's a question. The most powerful debate technique ever is a question. And the funny thing is almost nobody uses it because it doesn't feel as satisfying as attacking someone.  It doesn't feel as satisfying as proving someone wrong.  And it definitely doesn't feel as satisfying as winning.  The most powerful debate technique is this, I'm going to tell you.  Ask people to define their terms.  That's it. That's the technique because most arguments aren't actually arguments, they're collisions.  They're collisions between different definitions.  Take almost any controversial issue that people spend hours arguing, days arguing, years arguing, and then eventually you discover they are using the same word to mean completely different things.  Words like freedom, justice, equality, rights, violence, man, woman, harm.  Nobody stops to ask, "What exactly do you mean by that?"  And until you answer that question, the debate can't even begin.  One person is playing chess and the other person person is playing checkers.  And both think they're winning.  The reason this technique is so powerful is because definitions expose assumptions.  They expose assumptions the moment someone defines a word. They reveal the hidden beliefs underneath it. Suddenly you're no longer arguing about conclusions, you're examining the foundation those conclusions were built on.  And sometimes something amazing happens.  You discover that you don't actually disagree about the facts; you disagree about the meaning of a single word.  So most people think debate is about having better answers.  I think great debate is about asking better questions.  And one of the best questions you can ever ask is "What do you mean by that?"  Because clarity is Kryptonite to manipulation.  If you're trying to think more clearly in a world full of propaganda, persuasion, and psychological manipulation, check out my guide, Breaking the Spell.

ANDREW BRANCA: A world-class Medical examiner in [Zimmerman] trial testified that the beating was "absolutely likely to inflict death or serious bodily injury." That makes it a deadly force attack, justifying Zimmerman's deadly force defense.

from Andrew Branca.

He's like, oh, let's look at all these poor black victims. Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman was acquitted.

Tamir Rice: no indictment. Michael Brown: no indictment.

Philando Castile: officer was acquitted.

Freddie Gray: officers were acquitted or charges dropped.

Terrence Crutcher: officer was acquitted.

Sylville Smith: officer acquitted. 

Chikei "Rick" Chao was found not guilty after the shooting death of 14-year-old Cyrus Carmack-Belton in South Carolina.

The "returning wallet" case could not be verified, but many people confuse it with Ralph Yarl, the black teen shot after going to the wrong house.  In that case, the shooter later pleaded guilty, so it was not a not-guilty verdict.

00:31.  And it's a mystery to her.  The reason these people were not convicted or sentenced must be racism.  It has to be racism.  All these poor black boys.  All these poor black boys.  It must be racism.  Well, let's take a look, shall we, Genius?

Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman was acquitted. George Zimmerman went to trial on a charge of malice murder.  Here is what he looked like at the scene. Trayvon Martin was trying to murder him to beat his head through a sidewalk.  Those are pictures of George Zimmerman's face.  His nose is broken sideways on his face.  The back of his head was against the sidewalk, so every punch was actually two blows: the punch to the front of his face with Trayvon Martin mounted on top of him, and then the blow of the back of his skull against the sidewalk.  George Zimmerman's face and the back of his head immediately after Trayvon Martin stopped trying to beat Zimmerman to death by beating Zimmerman's skull through a concrete sidewalk stopped Trayvon Martin was stopped only because of a 9 millimeter round shot by Zimmerman through Martin's demonic little heart murderous, little heart.  Zimmerman's nose was broken sideways on his face.  By the way, when the media printed these photos for the public, did you know they printed them in black and white, so you wouldn't know what you were seeing was blood?  Contemptible eyewitness testimony describe Trayvon Martin mounted on top of a fallen Zimmerman, beating him viciously.  The witness testified, "MMA ground and pound style."  Testified Zimmerman was screaming for his life, for help that never came.  A world-class Medical examiner in the trial testified that the beating was "absolutely likely to inflict death or serious bodily injury."  That makes it a deadly force attack, justifying Zimmerman's deadly force defense.  

Did Karmelo Anthony suffer a beating like this or anything everyone is testifying to the contact of Austin Metcalf to Carmelo characterized it as a "soft push."  And they were not in the dark alone they were surrounded by dozens of people including many black people we're supposed to believe we're supposed to believe that Carmelo Anthony had a reasonable belief that Austin Metcalf and Hunter Metcalf we're going to be allowed to be him to death in front of all those black people?

What about Tamir Rice?  Tamir Rice was a 12-year-old in Cleveland shot dead by police.  And you might be thinking to yourself, "Oh my God!  That sounds . . . how could police officers do that?  And there wasn't even an indictment?"  They shot a 12-year-old black boy, a little child . . .