BREAKING: Lindsay Clancy lawyer says 1 man on the jury is holding out and refuses to join the other 11 who believe she is Not Guilty pic.twitter.com/xh4pEcvC1q
Wait, 11 of the 12 jurors thought Lindsay Clancy was not guilty, even after she admitted to strangling her babies? So the one man is a lone holdout against madness?
every dispute immediately gets routed through institutional mediation. We've lost the capacity for what de Waal observed in male chimpanzee interactions. Direct conflict, clear resolution, and then rapid reconciliation. Instead we get proxy conflicts that never truly resolve because the underlying tensions are never directly confronted. --Liam DeBoer
We were told that a more feminized society would result in less conflict. But reality has determined that a lie.
Frans de Waal, 1948-2024, spent decades studying chimpanzees social dynamics at Arnhem Zoo and discovered something that revolutionized our understanding of primate politics. Most conflicts aren't initiated by the strongest males. They're orchestrated by females who recruit others to do the actual combat. The pattern is observable. A female approaches a male screaming and gesturing in the direction of her opponent until she's aroused him to such a pitch that he launches a furious attack on the other animal. The instigator herself never directly participates in the ensuing fight. This pattern of behavior is our new normal.
The sequence is always the same:
1) Identification of Target,
2) Signal of Distress,
3) Recruitment of enforcement, then
4) Withdrawal during consequences.
The instigator is the most influential player in the entire drama but she never lifts a hand. The fighting happens through proxy.
Now look at every feminized Institution in Western societies and watch how conflicts unfold. University bias reporting where students identify "harmful" content, file a complaint, then withdraw while administrative process investigates and punishes. Corporate HR systems where an employee signals distress about workplace behavior, appeals to HR, then steps back while investigation proceeds through company policy. Social media moderation, where users flag offensive content, appeal to platform authorities, then withdraw while algorithmic review systems determine violations and deliver consequences. The pattern is identical across all domains: Identify Target, signal distress, appeal to Authority, withdraw while the system delivers consequences. This is the feminine conflict mode operating through bureaucracy. We haven't gotten rid of conflict, we've simply delegated it.
We are creating systems that amplify female initiated coalition behavior at civilizational scale. The result is societies that cannot handle direct confrontation because every dispute immediately gets routed through institutional mediation. We've lost the capacity for what de Waal observed in male chimpanzee interactions. Direct conflict, clear resolution, and then rapid reconciliation. Instead we get proxy conflicts that never truly resolve because the underlying tensions are never directly confronted. The promise was that feminization would reduce violence and create more Cooperative societies. Instead, we got surveillance states where disagreement becomes a compliance issue routed through bureaucratic systems that monitor and punish rather than resolve. What de Waal observed in a zoo enclosure we've made the organizing principle of Western Civilization: the scream, the point, the appeal to Authority, the withdrawal, while others handle enforcement. The only difference is scale, and scale is everything.
Eagles and birds of prey get a lot of airtime as it relates to the carnage at solar and wind sites. But what about the bats?
Dead bats are found all over the ground below wind turbines. Why?
Turns out the pressure drop behind a passing blade bursts a bat's lung without them ever colliding with the turbine.
Whereas the birds found under the turbines sustain blunt trauma, broken wings, and broken necks, the bat bodies are littered all over the ground, peacefully.
A University of Calgary team led by Erin Baerwald decided to start dissecting.
As the article below stated:
"The team then necropsied 75 of the freshest carcasses in the field, and the pattern inverted. Only 32 of the 75 had obvious external injuries. But 69 of them, nine out of ten, had hemorrhaging inside the chest or abdomen: blood that had burst out of vessels and pooled in the body cavity. Under the microscope, lung tissue told the same story, with every one of the 17 bats examined histologically showing pulmonary lesions."
Solar and wind are torturing animals on a scale you're not familiar with. Why is that scale so big? It has to do with energy density. Since solar and wind generate such intermittent amounts of energy, they need a scale of land to even mildly "function." Along the way, the foreign companies make more money building at scale as well.
Tens of thousands of acres are taken out to build these ecologically catastrophic complexes.
Animal carnage is so bad that ORES knows to tell the developers they will have to "pay to mitigate" the deaths. As if money is going to magically resurrect these animals.
This is an evil, sick experiment being conducted on the wildlife of our state. I am disgusted by it. All who are responsible for the cover-up of its true environmental damage must be held accountable.