Tuesday, November 3, 2026

VISEGRAD 24: When South Africa’s President says, “There are no killings of White farmers in South Africa,” and the liberal media dismisses this as a racist conspiracy, spare a thought for Attie and Wilna Potgieter and their beautiful baby girl, Wilmien.

Their daughter, 2-year-old Wilmien, was shot in the back of the head. The Potgieter family were brutally murdered on their farm in the Free State, South Africa in 2010. The father, Attie, had 151 stab wounds. A pathologist said he had been tortured to death. His wife, Wilna, suffered lacerations to her head and was shot in the neck. Their two-year-old girl, Wilmien, had a cut to her head made with a sharp instrument before she was shot in the back of the head at close range. When South Africa’s President says, “There are no killings of White farmers in South Africa,” and the liberal media dismisses this as a racist conspiracy, spare a thought for Attie and Wilna Potgieter and their beautiful baby girl, Wilmien.

They deserved so much better. 

PAT CONDELL: We're aware that [Islamophobia is] a poisonous lie peddled by islamists and leftists for the purpose of censoring the ugly truth about Islam and bludgeoning people into guilt-ridden silence. And we're aware that it's a sneaky way for a fascist ideology to depict itself as a victim and not as what it actually is: a predator.

From Pat Condell.  His YouTube channel.

00:11.  I think it's important to be aware of islamophobia, don't you?  Not the concept obviously, because that doesn't exist, but the word, which does exist and has been growing like a tumor on the language for some years now.  Happily the last two decades of relentless Muslim grievance mongering and knee-jerk offense have made many of us keenly aware of the word islamophobia as a cynical weapon of cultural terrorism and an outrageous attempt to portray common sense as a mental illness.  We're aware that it's a poisonous lie peddled by islamists and leftists for the purpose of censoring the ugly truth about Islam and bludgeoning people into guilt-ridden silence.  And we're aware that it's a sneaky way for a fascist ideology to depict itself as a victim and not as what it actually is: a predator.  We're also aware that the word leaves an ugly stain on the character of everyone who uses it because each time it is used a transparent and deliberate lie is told.  However, islamophobia is not the only thing that we are aware of not anymore because thanks to those same two decades of shameless privilege seeking and groundless complaining we've become aware that many Muslims have, well, special needs in that they're psychologically chained to a raft of appalling double standards that we have to indulge if we are to avoid tantrums and violence.  We're also aware of the default Islamic grievance mongers position that only their feelings are important and nobody else's feelings are worth a damn.  We're aware of all this and we take it on board, of course, we do.  Yeah, right.  However, we're also aware that Islamic doctrine with its disdain for freedom, its primitive view of women and gay people, its anti-semitism, and general hatred of all things non-muslim is entirely incompatible with all our fundamental beliefs and values unfortunately.  We are also aware that Islamic values are aggressively non-negotiable, which essentially offers us a choice between submission and permanent conflict.  Thanks for that. We are aware that the arrival of Islam in the West has not enriched our society in the slightest; it has poisoned it and set us at each other's throats over fundamental freedoms we used to take for granted.  And we're aware that Islam is being imposed upon us in the name of diversity but it hasn't brought diversity.  It's brought division and mistrust, and every time we hear the word islamophobia the divide gets wider and the mistrust grows.  We are aware that there are far fewer violent physical attacks on Muslims than there are by Muslims on gay people and Jews.  And that thanks to repeated unprovoked attacks by ignorant and uncivilized Muslim immigrants, Jews and gays no longer feel safe in several European countries but nobody wants to do anything about it because it might be Islamaphobic.  We're aware that the professional complainers of Islam are quick to be offended by a movie trailer nobody has ever seen but not when a young girl is shot in the head for wanting an education nor by the thousands of other disgusting Muslim crimes against women.  Aod we're aware that that makes them look like callous opportunistic hypocrites which in turn makes it impossible for us to take seriously anything they say.  That's such a shame, isn't it?  Muslims who find that their religion is viewed negatively should have the good grace to stop skulking behind this slanderous word.  Show a little honesty for once and admit that your religion is the problem because it is.  It's a religion that doesn't preach universal brotherhood but a universal Islamic domination, and there's a huge difference.  It preaches hatred and violence in its holy scriptures not just once or twice but page after page.  It shows open contempt for other beliefs and values.  It defines itself in aggressively divisive terms between Muslims and infidels who must be conquered and converted between the house of Islam and the House of War no less.  It urges Muslims not to take infidels as friends to force their social values into the lives of those around them and to shove their religion down everybody's throat as soon as they're strong enough to do so.  It's ultra sensitive to the point of paranoia on a permanent hair trigger the possible imagined offense and many of its followers regard violence as a legitimate response to criticism, yet we're the ones with the mental illness?  I don't think so.  Hearing about the poor downtrodden Muslims as victims of Islamophobia is enough to bring tears to your eyes, tears of laughter at the brazen effrontery of it.  Islamophobia is no more real then Nazi phobia.  There are very good reasons to be aware of both ideologies and they are the same reasons.  Far from being an oppressed minority, the evidence shows that Muslims are a pushy and aggressive minority, and when they're in a majority they quickly become enthusiastic about oppressors driven by a laughable delusion of divinely ordained Supremacy in which itself would be offensive if it wasn't such a sick joke because frankly Islam is equipped to rule the world the way Mike Tyson is equipped to run NASA.

I really think it's time that the word islamophobia was put out of his misery once and for all, because, frankly, it's getting embarrassing now. That word is just so discredited and so provably statistically false that anyone still using it with a straight face merely shows the depth of their own dishonesty and they're absolute contempt for the intelligence of everyone else.  I still think an awareness month would be a good idea.  I just think it would be more helpful to call it something else, like a Cultural Terrorism Awareness Month, or, even better, a "Hatred and Violence in the Quran Awareness Month," because unlike islamophobia that's something that really does exist in black and white for everyone to read.

RON ARMSTRONG: And if [Chuck Schumer] indeed goes against the DSA, which is now in charge of the Democratic Party, just understand this isn't maybe what they believe personally, but it's what is necessary because moving forward it will not be tolerated for you to be middle of the road Democrat any longer.

SECURING AMERICA: 11/03/26 Frank is joined by Ron Armstrong of Stand Up Michigan, Dr. Karen Siegemund of the American Freedom Alliance, and Dr. David Wurmser to discuss Michigan’s Senate race, election integrity and education, and Israel’s coalition challenges amid regional threats. Ron discusses the Michigan Senate race between Republican Mike Rogers and Democrat Abdul El-Sayed, saying the contest is close and that recent events could influence voters who have not yet cast ballots. He describes former Democratic primary candidate Haley Stevens’s endorsement of Rogers after a dispute with El-Sayed’s campaign and estimates that even a small shift in votes could affect the result. The conversation also covers COVID-era restrictions, freedom of speech, and what they describe as threats to constitutional rights, connecting the Michigan race to broader divisions within the Democratic Party and the potential impact on control of the Senate. Karen expresses concerns about election integrity and says educational institutions influence students’ values, knowledge, and sense of national identity. She discusses Chinese and Qatari involvement in education, the role of Confucius Institutes, and the effects of schools taking on responsibilities she believes belong to parents. The conversation also addresses the impact of school policies on children’s identities and family relationships. David analyzes Israel’s recent election and the difficulty of forming a governing coalition. He discusses the Arab parties’ role, possible paths including another election or a national unity government, and the pressures Israel faces from Iran, Gaza, Hezbollah, and other regional issues. He considers reported contacts among Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan, and argues that Turkey and Qatar are working together. He says the central question regarding possible U.S. action against Iran is whether the aim would be regime change, and whether Israel would be included in the planning. @Wurmserscribit


Schumer is doubling down and backing Abdul El-Sayed instead of the actual Democratic Party.  And I think that we're seeing this because he wants to maintain, if they take the Senate, a chance to stay in leadership.  And if he indeed goes against the DSA, which is now in charge of the Democratic Party, just understand this isn't maybe what they believe personally, but it's what is necessary because moving forward it will not be tolerated for you to be middle of the road Democrat any longer.  And that is what basically Chuck Schumer said is through Haley under the bus for what she stood for even though he supposedly has so defended the Jewish community . . .

If you're a Christian, it is absolutely your civic responsibility to vote.
ONE JUDGE IN D.C. JUST HANDED CALIFORNIA ELECTION OFFICIALS A GET-OUT-OF-JAIL-FREE CARD Judge Boasberg's ruling should bother you even if you never think about ballot procedures.
He sits in Washington, D.C. The officials in question work in California, nearly 3,000 miles away. No one has been charged. No indictment is in front of him. And yet he has effectively told DOJ what it may and may not threaten to prosecute.
That isn't his job. Deciding who gets investigated and charged belongs to the executive branch. Deciding guilt belongs to a judge and jury in the district where the case is brought. A chief judge in D.C. doesn't get to pre-clear conduct for officials on the other side of the country.
Legally, his opinion binds no other court. There are more than 650 district judges in this country, and not one of them has to agree with him. Practically, the damage is done. Most of these statutes require that a defendant acted knowingly or willfully. Now every official who gets charged will walk into court waving a federal judge's opinion and say, "How could I have known? A chief federal judge told the government to back off."
Good luck proving willfulness after that.
He didn't need to issue a verdict. He just poisoned the well before a single case was filed. 

#Boasberg #ElectionIntegrity #RuleOfLaw #SeparationOfPowers #JudicialOverreach #California