SETH GRUBER: they won't define marriage, therefore they won't protect it. They won't define a woman, therefore they won't protect them. They won't define the unborn, therefore they won't protect them.

He’s not wrong! We are sadly allowing this to happen! https://t.co/GqFHS8br7i

— Silverbell4you (@Silverbell4you2) October 25, 2026

Seth Gruber.

Why does it feel like America is falling apart?

Why can't we define what a woman is?  Because for 52 years we've been pretending that we don't know what a baby is.  They won't def--they won't define marriage, therefore they won't protect it.

They won't define a woman, therefore they won't protect them. 

They won't define the unborn, therefore they won't protect them.

Pay attention.  

John Locke says he who defines the words defines the world Language shapes the way we think and it colors the way we see the world if we're not willing to use the correct words and make the right arguments on this most fundamental of all issues we will continue to surrender every other freedom that we have taken for granted in this Republic.

So when we stand for the unborn we're not just obeying God's Commandment that we find in Leviticus 20 to speak up.  He says if you sacrifice children to Moloch or you let them and you pretend not to see, I'll cut you off from the people. I'll cut you off from your tribe.  I'll cut you off from Israel.  For what?  For killing babies?  No, no, no, no, no.  It says, it says "for looking at those who sacrificed their children to Moloch and not doing anything." So this issue is not important just because God says it is; it's important because if we can't get it right and we can't answer those questions, you can kiss America and your freedoms goodbye because we're dealing with the question, "What does it mean to be human?  What does it mean to be a person?  And do we all share those rights equally?"

LINUXHIPPIE: an Operative that was trained by the Islamic Movement. There are tens of thousands of them in the U.S. These incidents will increase exponentially in the coming years.

You're watching an Operative that was trained by the Islamic Movement. There are tens of thousands of them in the U.S. These incidents will increase exponentially in the coming years.

— Linuxhippie (@linuxhippie) October 26, 2026

The jihadi mentions the Jinn and the shayatin.  These are very dark, demonic people who have a penchant for violence.  Though the representatives within your own country will tell you they're from a peaceful religion.

KEVIN MCKERNAN: Psilocybin has a much larger therapeutic index than IVM.

I suspect your trolling the means.. But in case you’re not, psilocybin has a much larger therapeutic index than IVM. The therapeutic index (TI) is a ratio that compares the toxic dose (usually TD50 or LD50) to the effective dose (ED50) of a drug. A higher TI means a wider margin of safety. Here’s a side-by-side comparison: Psilocybin •ED50 (effective dose): ~6–10 mg orally in humans •LD50 (lethal dose): ~280 mg/kg in rats (oral) •Estimated human LD50 extrapolated: >17,000 mg for a 70 kg adult (very high) •Therapeutic Index: >1000 •Notes: •Extremely low toxicity; no known fatal overdose from pure psilocybin. •Primary risks are psychological (e.g., panic, psychosis) rather than physiological. Ivermectin •ED50 (effective antiparasitic dose): ~150–400 µg/kg (human standard dose) •LD50 (lethal dose): ~10–30 mg/kg in mammals •Therapeutic Index: ~50–100 depending on species and route •Notes: •High safety margin in antiparasitic use. •Neurotoxicity becomes a concern at very high doses or in certain dog breeds lacking MDR1 gene; rare in humans at therapeutic levels. Summary •Psilocybin has a much higher therapeutic index (>1000), reflecting its extremely low physical toxicity. •Ivermectin has a high but lower TI (~50–100), still considered safe within prescribed doses.

— Kevin McKernan (@Kevin_McKernan) May 10, 2025

I suspect your trolling the means. But in case you’re not, psilocybin has a much larger therapeutic index than IVM. The therapeutic index (TI) is a ratio that compares the toxic dose (usually TD50 or LD50) to the effective dose (ED50) of a drug. A higher TI means a wider margin of safety. Here’s a side-by-side comparison: PSILOCYBIN •ED50 (effective dose): ~6–10 mg orally in humans •LD50 (lethal dose): ~280 mg/kg in rats (oral) •Estimated human LD50 extrapolated: >17,000 mg for a 70 kg adult (very high) •Therapeutic Index: >1000 •Notes: •Extremely low toxicity; no known fatal overdose from pure psilocybin. •Primary risks are psychological (e.g., panic, psychosis) rather than physiological. IVERMECTIN •ED50 (effective antiparasitic dose): ~150–400 µg/kg (human standard dose) •LD50 (lethal dose): ~10–30 mg/kg in mammals •Therapeutic Index: ~50–100 depending on species and route •Notes: •High safety margin in antiparasitic use. •Neurotoxicity becomes a concern at very high doses or in certain dog breeds lacking MDR1 gene; rare in humans at therapeutic levels. SUMMARY •Psilocybin has a much higher therapeutic index (>1000), reflecting its extremely low physical toxicity. 

•Ivermectin has a high but lower TI (~50–100), still considered safe within prescribed doses. 

Duck Eggs vs. Chicken Eggs

https://t.co/aO9LVd96BK

— SGAnon (@TheQNewsPatriot) October 25, 2026

Duck eggs have a harder shell so they last a lot longer on your counter than chicken eggs.

Ducks lay all through the winter, and they can give you 250 to 350 + eggs in a year, which is more than a chicken.

Making a coop for [ducks] is so much easier than the ones you have to make for chickens.  You don't need all these roosting boxes or purchase.  They just lay their eggs on the ground in here.  So it's a lot simpler.

Ducks are more disease resistant than chickens, and especially if you feed them red pepper flakes that keeps the parasites down and egg production up. 

Way more protein in one duck egg than you would in a chicken egg, and the yolk is so rich.  As long as you keep clean water and a good feed for them, then their eggs taste exactly like chicken.

Ducks also eat bugs and slugs off of your garden.

Ducks are like less dramatic.  They don't fight like chickens do.

Ducks lay eggs for 5+ plus years; that's longer than chickens who slow down at 2 to 3 years.

NATHAN VERGIN: There is a big difference between I don't have the ideal setup and I can't start. Those are two separate things.

A 19 year old with no land and no money built a 40-cow dairy on somebody else's farm. 300 families were buying milk off that rented ground before he ever paid for an ad. Nathan Vergin got in by managing one of Joel Salatin's rental farms in Virginia: income off the beef herd, an apartment, access to equipment and a shop. He found customers before he had a parlor. He called everybody he knew, told them he was starting a raw milk herd share, and asked them to pass it on. No ads. A list. About 30 said yes. While the parts sat in transit he milked five cows by hand for five days straight, by himself. The parlor: old tie stall stanchions bolted to a hay wagon chassis, a vacuum pump hooked to a lawnmower engine, a box around the engine to keep the weather off. He pulled it into the field, fired it up, milked into a bucket, carried the milk to the cooler. It was ugly as a mud fence. It milked cows. There is a big difference between I don't have the ideal setup and I can't start. Those are two separate things. Word of mouth did the marketing. Somebody drank the milk, told a friend. He bought another cow, needed more ground, more people called, more cows. No five year plan. Demand pulled him forward one cow at a time. Virginia won't let raw milk sit on a store shelf, so the herd share is the road in. Customers own a slice of the herd and pay a boarding fee. The milk is theirs as owners. Nobody handed him a farm. He found the grass, then the customers, and the customers set his size. That is a business a middleman cannot shut off. Your rancher, Jason Hanley | 208-714-0478

— AcmeAcres.us (@idahobeef) October 25, 2026

A 19 year old with no land and no money built a 40-cow dairy on somebody else's farm. 300 families were buying milk off that rented ground before he ever paid for an ad. Nathan Vergin got in by managing one of Joel Salatin's rental farms in Virginia: income off the beef herd, an apartment, access to equipment and a shop. He found customers before he had a parlor. He called everybody he knew, told them he was starting a raw milk herd share, and asked them to pass it on. No ads. A list. About 30 said yes. While the parts sat in transit he milked five cows by hand for five days straight, by himself. The parlor: old tie stall stanchions bolted to a hay wagon chassis, a vacuum pump hooked to a lawnmower engine, a box around the engine to keep the weather off. He pulled it into the field, fired it up, milked into a bucket, carried the milk to the cooler. It was ugly as a mud fence. It milked cows. There is a big difference between I don't have the ideal setup and I can't start. Those are two separate things. Word of mouth did the marketing. Somebody drank the milk, told a friend. He bought another cow, needed more ground, more people called, more cows. No five year plan. Demand pulled him forward one cow at a time. Virginia won't let raw milk sit on a store shelf, so the herd share is the road in. Customers own a slice of the herd and pay a boarding fee. The milk is theirs as owners. Nobody handed him a farm. He found the grass, then the customers, and the customers set his size. That is a business a middleman cannot shut off. Your rancher, 

Jason Hanley | 208-714-0478