Showing posts with label 2026. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2026. Show all posts

Friday, November 6, 2026

ANNA D. WEST: This is what modern Hollywood films present us instead. Interfaith dialogue and a Saladin who respects the cross more than....the Crusaders. This is how you end up with CAIR endorsed candidates winning office.

from Anna D. West,

When Saladin took Jerusalem, 1187, he destroyed all the crosses, including the relic of the True Cross which the Muslims took in battle. They paraded them before Christians before destroying them, even urinating on some of them.  
He had 200-300 Christian Knights beheaded while he watched. He had 8000 women and children enslaved that day alone, including noble women and nuns forced into concubinage. Muslims enthusiastically described the deflowering and r*pe of the Christian women. Through his entire campaign it's estimated that 40-50k Christians were enslaved. This is what modern Hollywood films present us instead. Interfaith dialogue and a Saladin who respects the cross more than....the Crusaders.

This is how you end up with CAIR endorsed candidates winning office. A population fed CAIR-endorsed films like this one. 

The 1935 film, directed by Cecil B. De Mille, is titled, The Crusades.

Raynald of Chatillon, 1125-1187.

SCOTT MECHKOWSKI: Plenty never showed up at all. Immigration judges issued 485,456 removal orders in fiscal 2025, and according to the Congressional Research Service, 306,557 of them were in absentia. ICE is funded through 2029.

from Scott Mechkowski,

Start with the law itself. The Immigration and Nationality Act is one of the thickest statutes Congress has ever passed. Look at the grounds that make someone removable from this country, and you’ll find the criminal ones are a small slice: section 212(a)(2) on the inadmissibility side and section 237(a)(2) on the deportability side. Nearly everything else is non-criminal. Entering without inspection. Overstaying a visa. Visa fraud. Falsely claiming to be a citizen. Violating the terms of the visa you came in on.

That’s by design. Removal is a civil process. Congress never wrote an immigration law that only applies to criminals, and no president of either party has ever enforced one. The Obama administration removed 438,421 people in fiscal 2013. In 2014, Janet Murguía, head of the pro-amnesty National Council of La Raza, branded Obama the “deporter-in-chief” and complained that people with no criminal record were being sent home. She called the label a fact. She was right, and she made my point for me. Under the same law ICE enforces today, a Democratic president removed people who had never been convicted of anything, and Democrats in Washington kept writing the checks.

Talk about your due process.  It's endless.

Here’s what the word leaves out. A final order of removal is the end of the line, not the beginning. The alien was served a Notice to Appear with the charges and a hearing date. An immigration judge heard the case. He could bring a lawyer, present evidence, and apply for asylum, withholding of removal, protection under the Convention Against Torture, or cancellation of removal. If he lost, he could appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals and then to a federal circuit court. He could file motions to reopen and ask for a stay. Many were free on release the whole time, on the promise they’d show up and comply.   
Plenty never showed up at all. Immigration judges issued 485,456 removal orders in fiscal 2025, and according to the Congressional Research Service, 306,557 of them were in absentia. The alien didn’t come to court. Not for the hearing, and not for the asylum claim; many of them filed themselves. 
That’s how you end up with roughly 1.6 million aliens on ICE’s non-detained docket with final orders, up from 1.29 million in October 2023. These aren’t people waiting on a decision. The decision was made. They decided it didn’t apply to them.  
And a lot of these “non-criminals” aren’t even that. Entering the country illegally is a federal misdemeanor under 8 U.S.C. 1325. Willfully failing to depart after a final order is a federal crime under 8 U.S.C. 1253. In the headlines, “non-criminal” usually means never charged, not never broke the law. A man who has spent ten years defying an immigration judge’s order is a fugitive. If an American walked away from a court judgment for a decade, nobody would call his record clean.

Democrats won both houses of Congress on Tuesday, and they’ll spend the next two years holding hearings about “non-criminals.” Fine. Hold them. But section 241 of the INA directs the government to detain and remove aliens under final orders, and gives it 90 days to do it. ICE is funded through 2029. If Congress wants a criminals-only immigration law, it can try to pass one. Until then, ICE enforces the one on the books.

STEVEN WELLIEVER: Lenin [1920] insisted that in a struggle against the 'Left', Communists needed to conform to the character of the religious structures in each country for a successful revolution. Why rely on Rogan when Lenin made the plan 106 years ago?

JOHN GUANDOLO: Until Americans . . . actually recognize we're in a war. What you're seeing right now is the Islamic movement / communist movement seizing real overt power in the United States.

Stella Escobedo opens with a reference to the midterms.  But I can't find this particular video on her YouTube channel.  Like John says, "We aer working on getting it back to you in another medium."  

The midterms are over.  Big loss for the GOP.  John Guandolo, is a former FBI Special Agent, National Security expert.  Is the Iran War to blame? 

No.  The enemy is to blame.  This is like 9/11.  Until Americans pull their heads out of their backsides, and actually recognize we're in a war.  And the election process is one line of operation of many in this war.  What you're seeing right now is the Islamic movement / communist movement seizing real overt power in the United States.  And besides Iran, you can't you can't on one hand wage war against Iran and talk about how evil they are and then kiss the ass of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and do business with them and pretend like they're our friends.  Or have the vice president of the United States say, "We love Pakistan," while Pakistan's ISI is running intense intelligence operations against your Administration to get the nitwit we call the vice president to make a comment like that.

Everyday and moment that Tucker Carlson and the rest of the toxic people spent talking about Israel, they literally took their eyes off the prize. Am I right?

You're right.  It's not the Iran War.  It's not "there aren't enough McDonald's in Yemen."  It's not "the Muslims aren't educated enough."  It's there is a war that is being waged by hostile foreign powers: China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Qatar, UAE, Turkey, and others using thousands of US-based proxies.  

JOHN GUANDOLO: CAIR is a Hamas organization. By not identifying CAIR as a terrorist organization you give Hamas room to operate in your community while simultaneously lying to the American people who read your publication about the grave threat it poses to the communities in which it operates.

from John Guandolo, 

Stephanie, as a journalist standards of professional conduct require you to do at least some due diligence before merely calling CAIR a “muslim advocacy” group. CAIR was founded by the US Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee which is Hamas. CAIR is a Hamas organization. Hamas is a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization. A partial statement of facts can be found below. By not identifying CAIR as a terrorist organization you give Hamas room to operate in your community while simultaneously lying to the American people who read your publication about the grave threat it poses to the communities in which it operates. #CAIRisHamas 

"CAIR Is Hamas," John Guandolo, 2016.  CAIR was founded in 1994 by the US Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee, which is Hamas.

SOLZHENITSYN: “Liberty destroys equality; indeed, that is one of liberty’s roles. Equality restricts liberty; otherwise, it could not be achieved.”

“The French Revolution unfolded in the name of a contradictory and unattainable slogan: liberty, equality, fraternity.”

“Liberty destroys equality; indeed, that is one of liberty’s roles. Equality restricts liberty; otherwise, it could not be achieved.” Solzhenitsyn  

The Gulag Archipelago: An Experiment in Literary Investigation, Complete 3 Volumes 1, 2, & 3, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, 1973.

Darializa Avila Chevalier, a Democratic congressional candidate, made the statement, "I forgot to get napkins so I just wiped my hand on the American flag behind me," in a now-deleted tweet from 2019.

On Twitter (now X), on December 23, 2019. Darializa Avila Chevalier (then using the account @darializabonet) posted: “I forgot to get napkins so I just wiped my hand on the American flag behind me .” The post is archived on the Wayback Machine (status ID 1209247594439946243). Screenshots of it show a timestamp of around 3:01 PM that day. The account was a personal one she used before entering politics; she later deleted it (around May 2022). The tweet resurfaced in 2026 during her successful Democratic primary campaign for New York’s 13th Congressional District and was confirmed as authentic by Snopes and other fact-checker.  She has since addressed the backlash, 

expressing regret over the pain it caused while framing it in the context of her feelings at the time. 

That doesn't sound like an apology for her actions or conduct or disrespect.  It sounds like she's trying to claim that she's got religious powers over people's feelings and the power to wash away hurt feelings.  Bring back witch burnings. 

LINUXHIPPIE: This is happening in every state. At the heart of all the Revolutions is the modern era---Lawyers.

🇺🇸 Nancie Givens, former executive director of the Arkansas Supreme Court’s Office of Professional Programs, was charged Thursday with 65 counts of tampering with a public record. Authorities allege she altered bar exam scores across at least 8 administrations from July 2020 to July 2025, moving points between examinees so some reached the 270 passing threshold while at least 1 passing score was lowered to failing.

11,400 related files were also deleted or made unavailable. 

Thursday, November 5, 2026

PETE HEGSETH:

WHAT THE DIRECTIVE ACTUALLY ACTIVATED

The September 22 memorandum, publicly announced September 28, directed the Department of War to use:

  • U.S. Cyber Command to identify and counter foreign cyber threats.

  • The NSA and other defense intelligence agencies to collect information about foreign interference.

  • Joint operations with the Department of Homeland Security to counter cyber threats.

It did not order troops to polling precincts. Axios specifically reported that the directive did not direct military personnel to the polls.  Axios+2

WHAT ASSURANCES WERE GIVEN ABOUT TROOPS?

There were two important developments:

  1. August 31: Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dan Caine said the military had no plans to send federal military personnel or federalized National Guard members to polling places, or to seize ballots or voting machines.  Investing.com+1

  2. October 1: The Pentagon gave Senator Elissa Slotkin written confirmation that it had no plan to deploy active-duty troops or federalized National Guard to polling sites.  Senator Elissa Slotkin

WHAT HAPPENED ON NOVEMBER 3 2026?

The reporting published November 3 and 4 indicates:

No reported military deployment at polling places
  • USA Today reported that armed federal authorities had not appeared at polling places to question voters or seize election materials.  AOL

  • The Washington Post reported November 4 that there were no reports of military troops or ICE agents being deployed to polling places.  The Washington Post

  • The Justice Department did deploy more than 900 election monitors to approximately 120 jurisdictions in all 50 states. These were monitors, not military enforcement troops.  The Washington Post+1

WHAT ABOUT THE LAW?

Federal law, 18 U.S.C. § 592, generally makes it a federal offense to station troops or armed federal personnel at a place where an election is being held, subject to a narrow exception involving armed enemies of the United States.

My conclusion: Hegseth's plan was put into action as a military intelligence and cybersecurity initiative. The available reporting does not show that it was implemented by placing military enforcement troops at voting precincts. 

remember your heritage

ISIDORE OF SEVILLE: "To commit a crime is to kill the soul, but to despair is to fall into hell."

"Despair Is a Sin for a Reason: The Only Way Out Is Through, and You Gotta Build Through It," The American Tribue, March 10. 2026. 

Despair is a sin for a reason: it is an outgrowth of faithlessness. Further, it is a political sin, for a man who believes nothing can be saved generally stops trying to save anything. Aquinas held it was not the gravest sin but the most dangerous, because of what follows. "When hope is given up," he wrote, "men rush headlong into sin, and are drawn away from good works." Isidore of Seville put it harder: "To commit a crime is to kill the soul, but to despair is to fall into hell."

Much is said about realism. Realism can be good. Realism that gives way to despair is not. 

Wednesday, November 4, 2026

DIVERSITY RISING LIKE A HYDRA

AMJAD TAHA: When the mullahs in Iran took over, socialists helped them, and later, the Islamists killed them all. This is the most dangerous moment for Western civilization.

J. MICHAEL WALLER: Enough votes among the states to abolish the electoral college, and transition America toward a one-party regime?

MJ MURPHY: 4 States Protect Women's Teams and Athletes, bringing total to 31 States.

LINUXHIPPIE: Embrace the horror gentleman and know that it is your time to endure. If you aren't thinking about these events with reference to the above, you will find yourself a tool of the very thing you seek to fight.

from Linuxhippie,
Do not despair. "If there be not an excess of tyranny it is more expedient to tolerate for a while the milder tyranny than, by acting against the tyrant, to be involved in many perils which are more grievous than the tyranny itself" (De Regime Principum, III, ch. 10). "A tyrannical government is not just, because it is directed, not to the common good, but to the private good of the ruler… Consequently there is no sedition in disturbing a government of this kind, unless indeed the tyrant's rule be disturbed so inordinately, that his subjects suffer greater harm from the consequent disturbance than from the tyrant's government." (ST II-II, Q. 42, A. 2, ad 3) Resistance is not per se seditious, but it becomes so when the violence of the overthrow inflicts more harm on the common good than the tyranny itself. The tyrant, not the resisters, is the true seditious party: "it is the tyrant rather that is guilty of sedition, since he encourages discord and sedition among his subjects, that he may lord over them more securely." "The remedies against the evils of tyranny rather lie in the hands of public authority than in the private judgment of individuals." Where the people have the constitutional right to elect a ruler, they have the correlative right to depose him."

Embrace the horror gentleman and know that it is your time to endure. If you aren't thinking about these events with reference to the above, you will find yourself a tool of the very thing you seek to fight.
 

Tuesday, November 3, 2026

VISEGRAD 24: When South Africa’s President says, “There are no killings of White farmers in South Africa,” and the liberal media dismisses this as a racist conspiracy, spare a thought for Attie and Wilna Potgieter and their beautiful baby girl, Wilmien.

Their daughter, 2-year-old Wilmien, was shot in the back of the head. The Potgieter family were brutally murdered on their farm in the Free State, South Africa in 2010. The father, Attie, had 151 stab wounds. A pathologist said he had been tortured to death. His wife, Wilna, suffered lacerations to her head and was shot in the neck. Their two-year-old girl, Wilmien, had a cut to her head made with a sharp instrument before she was shot in the back of the head at close range. When South Africa’s President says, “There are no killings of White farmers in South Africa,” and the liberal media dismisses this as a racist conspiracy, spare a thought for Attie and Wilna Potgieter and their beautiful baby girl, Wilmien.

They deserved so much better. 

PAT CONDELL: We're aware that [Islamophobia is] a poisonous lie peddled by islamists and leftists for the purpose of censoring the ugly truth about Islam and bludgeoning people into guilt-ridden silence. And we're aware that it's a sneaky way for a fascist ideology to depict itself as a victim and not as what it actually is: a predator.

From Pat Condell.  His YouTube channel.

00:11.  I think it's important to be aware of islamophobia, don't you?  Not the concept obviously, because that doesn't exist, but the word, which does exist and has been growing like a tumor on the language for some years now.  Happily the last two decades of relentless Muslim grievance mongering and knee-jerk offense have made many of us keenly aware of the word islamophobia as a cynical weapon of cultural terrorism and an outrageous attempt to portray common sense as a mental illness.  We're aware that it's a poisonous lie peddled by islamists and leftists for the purpose of censoring the ugly truth about Islam and bludgeoning people into guilt-ridden silence.  And we're aware that it's a sneaky way for a fascist ideology to depict itself as a victim and not as what it actually is: a predator.  We're also aware that the word leaves an ugly stain on the character of everyone who uses it because each time it is used a transparent and deliberate lie is told.  However, islamophobia is not the only thing that we are aware of not anymore because thanks to those same two decades of shameless privilege seeking and groundless complaining we've become aware that many Muslims have, well, special needs in that they're psychologically chained to a raft of appalling double standards that we have to indulge if we are to avoid tantrums and violence.  We're also aware of the default Islamic grievance mongers position that only their feelings are important and nobody else's feelings are worth a damn.  We're aware of all this and we take it on board, of course, we do.  Yeah, right.  However, we're also aware that Islamic doctrine with its disdain for freedom, its primitive view of women and gay people, its anti-semitism, and general hatred of all things non-muslim is entirely incompatible with all our fundamental beliefs and values unfortunately.  We are also aware that Islamic values are aggressively non-negotiable, which essentially offers us a choice between submission and permanent conflict.  Thanks for that. We are aware that the arrival of Islam in the West has not enriched our society in the slightest; it has poisoned it and set us at each other's throats over fundamental freedoms we used to take for granted.  And we're aware that Islam is being imposed upon us in the name of diversity but it hasn't brought diversity.  It's brought division and mistrust, and every time we hear the word islamophobia the divide gets wider and the mistrust grows.  We are aware that there are far fewer violent physical attacks on Muslims than there are by Muslims on gay people and Jews.  And that thanks to repeated unprovoked attacks by ignorant and uncivilized Muslim immigrants, Jews and gays no longer feel safe in several European countries but nobody wants to do anything about it because it might be Islamaphobic.  We're aware that the professional complainers of Islam are quick to be offended by a movie trailer nobody has ever seen but not when a young girl is shot in the head for wanting an education nor by the thousands of other disgusting Muslim crimes against women.  Aod we're aware that that makes them look like callous opportunistic hypocrites which in turn makes it impossible for us to take seriously anything they say.  That's such a shame, isn't it?  Muslims who find that their religion is viewed negatively should have the good grace to stop skulking behind this slanderous word.  Show a little honesty for once and admit that your religion is the problem because it is.  It's a religion that doesn't preach universal brotherhood but a universal Islamic domination, and there's a huge difference.  It preaches hatred and violence in its holy scriptures not just once or twice but page after page.  It shows open contempt for other beliefs and values.  It defines itself in aggressively divisive terms between Muslims and infidels who must be conquered and converted between the house of Islam and the House of War no less.  It urges Muslims not to take infidels as friends to force their social values into the lives of those around them and to shove their religion down everybody's throat as soon as they're strong enough to do so.  It's ultra sensitive to the point of paranoia on a permanent hair trigger the possible imagined offense and many of its followers regard violence as a legitimate response to criticism, yet we're the ones with the mental illness?  I don't think so.  Hearing about the poor downtrodden Muslims as victims of Islamophobia is enough to bring tears to your eyes, tears of laughter at the brazen effrontery of it.  Islamophobia is no more real then Nazi phobia.  There are very good reasons to be aware of both ideologies and they are the same reasons.  Far from being an oppressed minority, the evidence shows that Muslims are a pushy and aggressive minority, and when they're in a majority they quickly become enthusiastic about oppressors driven by a laughable delusion of divinely ordained Supremacy in which itself would be offensive if it wasn't such a sick joke because frankly Islam is equipped to rule the world the way Mike Tyson is equipped to run NASA.

I really think it's time that the word islamophobia was put out of his misery once and for all, because, frankly, it's getting embarrassing now. That word is just so discredited and so provably statistically false that anyone still using it with a straight face merely shows the depth of their own dishonesty and they're absolute contempt for the intelligence of everyone else.  I still think an awareness month would be a good idea.  I just think it would be more helpful to call it something else, like a Cultural Terrorism Awareness Month, or, even better, a "Hatred and Violence in the Quran Awareness Month," because unlike islamophobia that's something that really does exist in black and white for everyone to read.

RON ARMSTRONG: And if [Chuck Schumer] indeed goes against the DSA, which is now in charge of the Democratic Party, just understand this isn't maybe what they believe personally, but it's what is necessary because moving forward it will not be tolerated for you to be middle of the road Democrat any longer.

SECURING AMERICA: 11/03/26 Frank is joined by Ron Armstrong of Stand Up Michigan, Dr. Karen Siegemund of the American Freedom Alliance, and Dr. David Wurmser to discuss Michigan’s Senate race, election integrity and education, and Israel’s coalition challenges amid regional threats. Ron discusses the Michigan Senate race between Republican Mike Rogers and Democrat Abdul El-Sayed, saying the contest is close and that recent events could influence voters who have not yet cast ballots. He describes former Democratic primary candidate Haley Stevens’s endorsement of Rogers after a dispute with El-Sayed’s campaign and estimates that even a small shift in votes could affect the result. The conversation also covers COVID-era restrictions, freedom of speech, and what they describe as threats to constitutional rights, connecting the Michigan race to broader divisions within the Democratic Party and the potential impact on control of the Senate. Karen expresses concerns about election integrity and says educational institutions influence students’ values, knowledge, and sense of national identity. She discusses Chinese and Qatari involvement in education, the role of Confucius Institutes, and the effects of schools taking on responsibilities she believes belong to parents. The conversation also addresses the impact of school policies on children’s identities and family relationships. David analyzes Israel’s recent election and the difficulty of forming a governing coalition. He discusses the Arab parties’ role, possible paths including another election or a national unity government, and the pressures Israel faces from Iran, Gaza, Hezbollah, and other regional issues. He considers reported contacts among Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan, and argues that Turkey and Qatar are working together. He says the central question regarding possible U.S. action against Iran is whether the aim would be regime change, and whether Israel would be included in the planning. @Wurmserscribit


Schumer is doubling down and backing Abdul El-Sayed instead of the actual Democratic Party.  And I think that we're seeing this because he wants to maintain, if they take the Senate, a chance to stay in leadership.  And if he indeed goes against the DSA, which is now in charge of the Democratic Party, just understand this isn't maybe what they believe personally, but it's what is necessary because moving forward it will not be tolerated for you to be middle of the road Democrat any longer.  And that is what basically Chuck Schumer said is through Haley under the bus for what she stood for even though he supposedly has so defended the Jewish community . . .

If you're a Christian, it is absolutely your civic responsibility to vote.