[Roberto] Speranza has been charged with murder in Italy for covering up the side effects of the COVID vaccines and forcing them on the country regardless.

Speranza has been charged with murder in Italy for covering up the side effects of the COVID vaccines and forcing them on the country regardless.

Italy is the only country in Europe where even mainstream media are covering the COVID vaccine debacle and the World Stealth… https://t.co/RRFYoT0P4W

— MERYL NASS, MD (@NassMeryl) April 6, 2024

Why not pivot from Jagger's emaciated mealy-mouthed lyrics and Keith Richard's creviced mug to compliant little bitches promoting a bioweapon on behalf of the surveillance state?

Rolling Stones to fans on Covid19 vaccines: "We've all had the shot and you better get one too" pic.twitter.com/Or0kHLMUvS

— Wittgenstein (@backtolife_2023) December 15, 2022

“Put the mask over your nose.”

Why not?  Their career is over.  In fact, their career has been over for a very long time.  It's just taken a while for the dope-addled late-boomers to notice.  They thought they could enjoy one last toke, one last hoorah, one last concert in the long goodbye.  

"Safe and effective"

But now it's official:  the insane Wango Tango 70s, rock 'n' roll's version of Helter Skelter and short-term thinking and decisions suggested by Stephen Stills' "Love the One You're With" to destroy American conservative life is over.  America's youth today has porn, and that's no match for running down to Music Plus, buying concert tickets from TicketMaster, and going to the old Inglewood Forum behind Hollywood Park.  

Is it a case of the cognitively impaired boomers are no longer capable of watching octogenarians prancing and prattle on stage has come to an end?  

SARS-CoV-2

And in today's easy access to almost any commodity, the "You Can't Always Get What You Want" ethic is no longer true?  So, why not pivot?  Why not pivot from Jagger's emaciated mealy-mouthed lyrics and Keith Richard's craggy rebel mug to compliant little bitches promoting a bioweapon on behalf of the surveillance state?  

"The new normal"

They've rocked.  And they've rolled.  Now it's time to gather the "green" or the moss, while calling us all to join them and go gently into that good night, a kind of a nostalgic, lyrical call to eugenics.  You know the murdering monsters at MI6 wrote the script for their commercial, the murdering bastards.

"The CDC says . . ."

Mick Jagger is almost 80 years old.  Young and old people like their music, not the performance of old men prancing on stage.  Ain't that a picture? 

"Did you get Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson?"

Keith Richards is 78, again almost 80 years old.  Why attend the concert of octogenarians?  Buy an album or CD and play their music at your birthday party if you like them so much.  So they've got nothing left to say musically, so they've opted to come out as pimps for the COVID warfare.  Nice guys, eh?

"15 Days to Flatten the Curve"

Ronnie Wood is 75, so he's done.  Or should have been done.  Who knows how much methamphetamine they required to make live performances.  I am sure that MI6 did much of their marketing.

       "We're all in this together"

The founder, Brian Jones, was lost in 1969.   

"Unprecedented times"

Charlie Watts checked out due to a "heart procedure surgery."  Hmm, I wonder from what.  It could not have been from the smoking alone . . . .

"I am Science"

IP6 UPREGULATES THE P53 GENES, THE GUARDIANS OF THE GENOME

If IP6:

➡️Increases N. Killer Cell activity
➡️Sequesters iron from viruses so can't replicate
➡️Up-regulates p53
➡️Ameliorates lung inflammation
➡️Stops β-Amyloid aggregation
➡️& people swear they never get sick while taking it

What could IP6 do to protect us from Covid? 🤔🕵🏼‍♀️ https://t.co/vtQ8MeHBcY

— Natural Immunity FTW (@NaturallyFTW) November 3, 2022

Here's what IP6 does to the protein 53 gene,

IP6 has been shown to desirably alter the expression of proteins produced by the p21 and p53 genes (these are cancer suppressing genes) that control cancer growth,

p53 is short for TP53, which stands for Tumor Protein 53.  TP53 is the name given to this particular protein in people.  In mice, it's labeled trp53. Biologically, the TP53 is pretty important to human life.  In fact, it's referred to as the Guardian of the Genome, so pretty dang important.  Wikipedia explains,

The p53 proteins (originally thought to be, and often spoken of as, a single protein) are crucial in vertebrates, where they prevent cancer formation.^[6] As such, p53 has been described as "the guardian of the genome" because of its role in conserving stability by preventing genome mutation. 

So if the spike protein inserted in the COVID-19 vaccines causes the p53 genes to down regulate, meaning to become less responsive, and suppress your immune system, IP6 switches that and up-regulates your p53 genes so that they are more responsive.  

IP6 Gold has come recommended.

Who needs data when you’ve got regulatory capture?

From Dr. Meryl Nass, May 30, 2022

Toby Rogers @ substack, "FDA Announces Updated Schedule for June Meetings Regarding Five Pivotal Vaccine Decisions," Toby Rogers, May 28, 2022

Who needs data when you’ve got regulatory capture?

Here is Dr. Toby Rogers' Substack profile.

May 29

I. The June FDA meetings

This week the Washington Post copied and pasted from a Pfizer press release to announce yet another scientific miracle(TM) that will completely fail in practice. In the process WaPo also got some quotes from the FDA who have now nailed down the schedule for the 4 meetings in June in which they intend to assemble the final pieces for Pharma’s permanent dominance over the American people.

THE NEW VACCINE SCHEDULE IS AS FOLLOWS: 

June 7, Novavax 
June 14, Moderna in kids 6 to 17 years old
June 15, Moderna in kids 6 months to 5 years AND Pfizer in kids 6 months to 4 years
June 28, “Future Framework” (the plan to skip clinical trials in perpetuity)

There is a lot to parse in the WaPo’s brief article.

Contrary to the breathless headline, THEY STILL DON'T HAVE ANY DATA. 

Pfizer and BioNTech said the 80 percent efficacy finding was preliminary and based on 10 cases of Covid-19 in the study population as of the end of April.  Once 21 cases have occurred, the companies will conduct a more formal analysis of efficacy . . . Pfizer and BioNTech said they plan to finish filing data with the FDA this week—and warned that the efficacy number was fluid because results are still arriving.

Let’s recap how we got here:

🚩 The Pfizer clinical trial in kids under 5 failed in December 2021.

🚩 So Pfizer added a third dose and that trial also apparently failed in February (which is why Pfizer was forced to withdraw its application on February 10).

🚩 Now Pfizer is describing a jerry-rigged trial of a third dose in 1,678 kids ages 6 months to four years old. Pfizer did not disclose how the kids were divided between the treatment and control group so it is impossible to run our own calculations on efficacy. Out of that sample, 10 developed Covid — although it is not clear how the 10 were distributed between the    treatment and control group. (I suppose some quant on Twitter will figure out how to work backwards from Pfizer’s claims to calculate the numbers in each of these categories but needless to say, this is not the proper way to do science.) Of course Pfizer also failed to describe the contents of the “placebo.”

As always with “publication by press release” the announcement raised more questions than answers:

“the efficacy finding was preliminary”; just 10 cases; “the companies will conduct a more formal analysis” next month; “the efficacy number was fluid because results are still arriving” — so you’re saying that these numbers are NOT statistically significant and in fact you have no
valid “results” at all? Got it.

How exactly will Pfizer double the number of Covid-19 cases in the clinical trial in the next month given that 74.2% of kids already had natural immunity in February which means that nearly 100% of children likely have natural immunity by now?

Also, is the FDA seriously considering basing national policy, that impacts 18 million children, by relying on a study with only 10 cases?  It appears that the FDA is not even pretending to care about science anymore.

What’s perhaps most troubling about this so-called clinical trial is that Pfizer is NOT looking at health outcomes in the real world (because there are none). Instead, all of their claims are based on antibodies in the blood. That’s strange because the members of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee unanimously acknowledged on April 6 that there are “no correlates of protection” in connection with Covid-19 shots (this means that there are no valid proxy measures, such as antibody counts, that can determine whether someone who has received this shot is immune to the virus or not.)

WaPo dutifully copied Pfizer’s disingenuous description:

While the adult trials recruited tens of thousands of volunteers and waited to see if vaccinated people were better protected, the children’s vaccine trials were primarily designed to measure immune responses using blood tests. 

No they were not “primarily designed to measure immune responses using blood tests.” The studies were intentionally undersize to hide harms from the shots in addition to other tricks that they use to skew the results (such as kicking you out of the trial if you call 911 or go to the emergency room). But when one shrinks the sample size, surprise! it becomes impossible to detect actual health benefits from the shots (the signal would have been tiny if at all, but when one uses a sample that small then any
positive signal can also disappear into statistical insignificance.) . . . 

Click here for the full report. 

COVID-19 refers to Corona venom 19.

This is Dr. Bryan Ardis' defense of his claim that COVID-19 is not a virus source, but rather it is snake venom poisoning. You'll have blood coagulation and anti-coagulation. The 19 in COVID-19 does not refer to 2019 as has been drilled into our heads. According to Ardis, the 19 refers to the 19 snake venom sequences.  

He is being attacked in the blogosphere with everybody dismissing his claim that COVID-19 is a King Cobra venom poisoning.  You may be tired of thinking or hearing about COVID-19, the spike proteins, Dr. Fauci, etc.  But you should know that this claim is not new.  And there is a way to stop the effects of venom poisoning in your body.  The product?  Nicotine.  Because nicotine blocks the snake venom inside the spike protein and keeps it from lodging in nACH Receptors.  He gives the etymology of the word virus.  Apparently, the COVID-19 refers to Corona venom 19.  

Snake venom toxin in the spike protein? Nicotine blocks spike from lodging in nAChReceptors

It was from Dr. Bryan Ardis where I'd first learned about Remdesivir, about a hospital advocate, and about how the spike proteins behaved like parasites and that people should be on anti-parasitics.  So I've loved his research abilities, his activism, and his network of professionals like Thomas Renz, Leigh Dundas, and others.  I've relied on other doctors, too, but Ardis' tenacity is inspiring.     

There were four sections of this interview that I found compelling.  

12:00  mm   

14:55  January 21st of this year, just two months ago, the FDA decided to authorize Remdesivir as the only drug to be used on newborns [newborns with COVID?] in this country.  The screenshot at 15:14 of "FDA Approves Veklury [Remdesivir] for the Treatment of Non-Hospitalized Patients at High Risk for COVID-19 Disease Progression" comes directly from a press release found at Gilead's website.  "I can't even fathom the men or women in charge who would actually do that.  So now it's been moved out of hospitals into in and out-patient care for children as the only treatment for as young as newborns, seven-pounds heavy, through the 18-year pediatric age range.  It's the only authorized drug.  There is nothing else that they're allowing for COVID-19 treatment.  I find that incredibly evil.  

#coincidence https://t.co/BxOKFYABkF

— Jennifer Depew, RD (@deNutrients) April 13, 2022

Also, now they've canceled monoclonal antibody uses throughout the United States and all U.S. territories for COVID-19 early treatment, and they're moving Remdesivir to the fusion centers where they were using monoclonal antibodies as the only IV infusion drug allowed. At the 15:55 mark, the screenshot contains the Forbes headline, "U.S. Pauses Distribution of Monoclonal Antibody Treatments that Proved Ineffective Against Omicron," Zachary Snowdon Smith, December 23, 2021. I have been moved with one singular purpose since May of 2020 when I read Anthony Fauci's memo about Remdesivir, I felt this spark inside of me that I now had to go voice to the world a warning to try to protect as many as possible innocent lives from being killed.  

16:40  It all started with a text.  There's a medical doctor that I admire and love that has had since the beginning of COVID the ability to project information

29:10  People are buying snake venom and mixing it with the same preparation as what is listed on the fact sheet of Velkury.  His screenshot does not provide a source.  Okay, what's his point?  To take Cobra venom, or any other kind of venom, and inject it into horses to create monoclonal antibodies.  When you read the EUA for Remdesivir, it states from January 21, that every practitioner who administers this to a COVID patient pediatric or not, you have to evaluate for thrombin time.  

29:36.  If it increases the prothrombin time, it means it's taking your blood's ability to coagulate and making it longer.  So it thins your blood; you can't clot.  You will internally bleed to death.  With Remdesivir it is stated on the Emergency Use Authorization, that every patient has to have its Prothrombin Time before you give Remdesivir and during treatment.  Do you know what King Cobra venom does to the blood?  

It makes it so that it can't clot. 

It makes it so that it can't clot.  Do you know what the other emphasis is?  It's prothrombin time.  And if you look at the CDC and NIH's websites, it actually says it increases prothrombin time, which is exactly what King Cobra venom does to the human body.  And Remdesivir is a lyophilized peptide-protein from King Cobra venom.  The University of Arizona published last summer a paper when they actually evaluated the blood samples and tissues of people who died, hundreds of them, from two different hospitals after being treated for COVID which means they got what drug--Remdesivir.  When they evaluated their blood, the title of their published article is "Like Venom Coursing the Through the Body: Researchers Identify Mechanism Driving COVID-19 Mortality," Rosemary Brandt, College of Agriculture and Life Science, August 24, 2021.

32:55  And then they take you through all of the elevated enzymes from the blood samples of these people that are naturally found in rattlesnake venom and viper venom that are at levels they've never seen before.  Do you want to know how they got there?  5-10 days of Remdesivir.  They've known since 2005 that if you inject a mouse with Cobra venom, like they're doing with Remdesivir injecting it into your veins, . . . [citing this article, "Histopathological Alterations Induced by Naja naja Crude Venom on Renal, Pulmonary and Intestinal Tissues of Mice Model, Md. Abdulla Al Mamun, et al., 2015. Here are Histological Changes] it actually causes a cytokine storm in all of the animals.  I am convinced that COVID-19 is not a respiratory virus of any kind.  It is actually venom poisoning.  It is actually, I believed, synthesized peptides and proteins from venoms of snakes, and they're administering them and targeting them to certain people.  The amazing thing about these 19 toxins found in Cobra venom is they're specifically sequenced to target specific organs, like the pancreas in a diabetic, like the heart in a heart-diseased patient, like the liver in a Hepatitis patient.  

33:55  So if I die because I am . . .  And then use mRNA technology that they've been isolating from snake venom for years that they knew were unusually stable, more stable than any other mRNA they've isolated from natural organisms for decades.  In 2015, they took mRNA from Cobra venom, krait venom they wrapped the mRNA in nanoparticle hydrogel "Nanofibrous Snake Venom Hemostat," ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2015;1(12):1300-1305.  DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00356. Epub 2015 Oct 20.  And they made it even more stable.  Then they actually added dynabeads to those nanoparticles surrounding the mRNA of snake venom and it made it even more stable.  It made it last longer.  It made it to get inside your cells.  Dynabeads are magnetic metals nanoparticles.  

36:54  Cites Season 4, Episode 15 of The Blacklist, 2016, called "The Apothecary."  Peptides found in krait venom poisoned Raymond "Red" Reddington.  In the show, you learn that he was poisoned by drinking from his drink.  Then I realized something.  I realized how they've been spreading this.  Odd that the CDC's website has a wastewater page with COVID tracker.  

45:00   

49:00 

Well, you'd think that new information like what Dr. Ardis presents here with Peters would bring ah-ha moments, and it does for his audience.  It did for me.  I'd heard that the spike proteins contain a genetic sequence of snake poison.  What I thought was interesting was how specific Ardis was by pointing out the King Cobra and the Chinese   Oh, and by the way, I am all for men like Ardis, who is a chiropractor by trade, to insert his research findings onto other fields.  This is how insights come about.  Now it's up to the scientific community to verify or deny it.   

Look. It AIN'T F*KCING SNAKE VENOM FOLKS.

No need to keep sending me the video. I appreciate the enthusiasm and thought. I watched it.

However, IT MIMICS SNAKE VENOM.  https://t.co/5IoPpvZGIy pic.twitter.com/nt3FuaI81J

— Walter M Chesnut (@Parsifaler) April 12, 2022

One scientist I follow, Walter Chestnut, says that there is no snake venom per se, but rather the spike protein ACTS like snake venom.  Chestnut calls the protein an epitope, which are antigens that 

And by this, I mean it's common epitopes that mimic. Not literal snake venom. Absurd.

— Walter M Chesnut (@Parsifaler) April 12, 2022

Good to know that there are remedies to snake venom poisoning.

Cobra venom protein sequence in C19, possibly the med. that begins with R. Be ready when time comes. Beware the V. This Tweet needs no warning, it is a warning. pic.twitter.com/q5CbqzZxdz

— DCGreenZone1 (@DCGreenZone) April 12, 2022

It's important to take nicotine lozenges.  Why?  Because nicotine blocks the snake venom inside the spike protein and keeps it from lodging in nACH Receptors.

*switched to lozenges. The patch can cause skin irritation https://t.co/HDBsGNrFi2

— Jennifer Depew, RD (@deNutrients) April 12, 2022

"YOU CANNOT PROVE 'VIRAL' CAUSATION WITH EPIDEMIOLOGY" --DR. TOM COWAN

Here is the document he refers to at the 13:10 mark: 

Dear Editor

“The best decisions are based on the best science”, the article quotes.

However, the CDC states on page 39 of its 13th July 2020 document entitled,’ CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only Instructions for Use’ (1) :

“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen”.

What does this mean? And is it the “best science”?

(1) https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

And here is the document he refers to published in EuroSurveillance.  As a preface to reading from the article, Cowan explains that a virus is a thing, like a fork. We're not talking about a thought or a feeling but rather a thing, like a chair or a fork.  If you say no quantifiable virus, you've never isolated the virus from anybody with COVID-19.  Further prefacing, he adds that Christian Drosten other virologists who were tasked with developing a test for this new Coronavirus were caught in a dilemma because they found nothing despite reports around the globe of vital contagion.  So let's see what they say.  Cowan reads the first sentence under "Background,"

The ongoing outbreak of the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) poses a challenge for public health laboratories as virus isolates are unavailable . . . . 

Then he reads the stated Aim of the study.  Jaw-dropping.  I recommend you read it twice.  

We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available. 

They had no virus to make a test to find a piece of the virus.  Therefore, the PCR test, the test which is being used all over the world to document cases, is a complete fraud.  They have never isolated a virus and said, "This is a unique piece of that virus," because they have no virus. 

Ah, are they the only ones? 

Then he quotes from a Pfizer document about making their mRNA vaccine.  

To build an RNA vaccine, scientists do not need the actual virus.  

In other words, Pfizer admits they have no virus with which to make a vaccine against.  They call it an actual virus as opposed to, I guess, a theoretical virus.  Now, I would change the word "theoretical" to say "an imaginary virus" or "a make-believe virus."  So they're using a make-believe virus, which they have never isolated, they don't know the sequence of, they don't know the components of to make a vaccine against this virus and God only knows what they're making a vaccine against.  

Here's another one, a paper published in Nature, which was one of the first papers published describing a novel coronavirus.  And a friend of mine, named Torsten Engelbrecht, asked him because he said he isolated the virus.  People have sent me about 20 different peer-reviewed articles, claiming they isolated the virus.  When you look at the paper, it's very clear that nobody has ever isolated the virus.  It's a fraud.  And we asked him, "Did you isolate the virus?" and he said, 

We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification. 

In other words, they didn't do what every peer-review journal, article has to do, which is to say, "Here are the steps we did.  Here's the pictures showing we have an isolated virus, . . ."  They didn't even take a picture and they admit they didn't isolate the virus.  

Here's another one.  Same thing: identification of a coronavirus isolate from a patient in Korea with COVID-19.  This was published by the Korean Center for Disease Control and Prevention, called the KDCA for Korean Disease Control Agency.  Essentially, it's the CDC of Korea.  So, we asked him, did you isolate the virus, because that's what it says in the title.  The answer was, "We could not estimate the degree of purification because we did not purify and concentrate the virus."  In other words, they have no virus.  

Here's another one.  Again, Isolation of the New Virus, "We showed seven virus particles not purified one.  The Canadian Health Ministry in a Freedom of Information Request, "Do you have any information on an isolation of this virus?"  Having completed a thorough search, we regret to inform you that we are unable to locate any records responsive to your request."  None of these groups who are organizing this have any example of an isolated virus.  If you've never isolated the virus, you have no way of knowing whether it causes disease.  Period.  And the test to identify a virus that you've never isolated, it's not false positive or false negative, it's just good, old-fashioned false.  It's meaningless.  So that's where we are.  I could go into how they misled themselves into thinking that they have this virus, but this is a scientific fraud.  And interestingly just three days ago, a group of European virologists and pathologists dissected this Drosten study and said this--the basis of using this study, which is the basis of all the PCR tests, all the testing is pure scientific fraud and they demanded that this journal retract the article.  

So, explain to me what's going on.  There are case reports, death reports, how all this happening and being reported on if there's not a virus? 

First of all, what are these people seeing at the site?  What is a virus?  So that's where it gets very interesting because that's where it leads you into understanding what is going on because in certain cases, like Chicken Pox, you do see these particles--I can show you a picture of them if you want--and they are at the site of the disease.  But we already know that just because you have strep in your throat, doesn't mean it's causing disease.  In order to prove causation, you have to isolate the virus, you have to take the Chicken Pox out, you have to prove you don't have anything else in there--no poisons, no snot, no nothing--just the virus, expose an animal to it.  They did that for 20 years and couldn't make any animal sick.  So the question is, "What is it doing there?" and it's a very interesting question because it gets into the question of how do we even know that it's coming from the outside?  Because it turns out when you have tissue, as I've described earlier, and you starve it and poison it, it packages up little pieces of degraded DNA and packages them up in particles as a detoxification and communication strategy.  In other words, if you break down the tissue, there's a poison-relief mechanism that we have erroneously called viruses.  They're coming from the inside: they're called exosomes, or intracellular vesicles.  Now, there's an article in a journal called Viruses, which looked at this question--how do we know that these are from the outside and not from the inside?  And they said something very interesting, "However, to date, a reliable method that can guarantee a separation of exosomes from viruses does not exist."  Everything that's a thing can be separated and isolated from every other thing.  If I had a fork here, I can separate it from a spoon because they're different.  There's only one reason I can't separate an exosome, which is a detoxification strategy from the inside from a pathogenic virus from the outside and that's because they're the same thing.  Something is poisoning the tissue.  The tissue packages up this degraded genetic material, and we mistakenly call those pathogenic viruses.  

FASCINATING

And here's where it gets interesting because we now know that those pieces of genetic material can resonate out into the world as a signal to other organisms that something bad has happened, that poisoning has happened and you should defend yourself.  This is how trees communicate.  If you get beetles eating a tree, they put out chemicals and other signals that communicate to the other trees that there are beetles around and you should defend yourself.  This is because the Darwinian model of evolution based on mutations and survival of the fittest is pure nonsense because it's way too slow.  If you were exposed to Glyphosate and one person had a mutation that allowed them to survive from that exposure, do you know how long that would take to spread through the whole population?  Like 10,000 years, if that even from Boston, for God's sake.  So, nature has another mechanism, which is called viruses, or exosomes.  So you package up this genetic material.  The DNA and RNA have a resonance just like women who communicate with their menstrual cycles through resonance.  A lot of unseen energy communicates through resonance.  That's what we call life.  And then the other organisms can make the same piece of genetic material and turn that into proteins to defend themselves.  So viruses are the mechanism of evolution.  They're the mechanism of adaptation.  A war on viruses is basically a war on evolution and adaptation.  It's a war on life.  So the question now is what is poisoning us?  Now when you look at the symptoms of the disease called COVID-19 and you forget about the virus--because the virus has never been isolated--it's basically imaginary.  So any therapeutics, or so-called maneuver, wearing a mask or social distancing or washing your hands to get rid of something that hasn't even been proven to exist is just nonsense.  It doesn't work at all, it just makes you sicker.

So what do we know about the disease?  Most of it are what are being called "Cases" are just PCR tests which mean nothing.  And I mean, mean nothing.  There are no false positives here because you cannot use that test without having compared it to an intact virus.  So a case means nothing.  Now, there are sick people.  Now, most of the sick people are just the usual sort of sick people.  But there are some sick people who are hypoxic and what's called a hyper-inflammatory state.  Now, how do they get hypoxic, it has nothing to do with viruses--viruses don't make you hypoxic.  But we do know from clear, scientific research, going back to the 1970s, the Naval Intelligent Research Institute did this, the Soviets did it.  There are recent papers on it . . . that if you expose a place to millimeter waves, otherwise known as 5G, three things will happen: one, you'll degrade the oxygen in the atmosphere, so you're essentially, this one ER doctor said, it's like these people are walking up the Himalayas.  His name is Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell, [who seemed to spot problems early on] he said they're in a low-oxygen environment, but they're in New York City or Wuhan or on a cruise ship that just had 5G installed.  And what's happening is the millimeter waves are degrading the oxygen in the atmosphere, so it's actually like they're on top of a mountain.  The second thing is 5G interferes with certain pathways in your mitochondria, which are organelles in your tissues that use oxygen to make fuel [energy].  We know this again, going back to research in the 1970s.  So you become tissue hypoxic, you're starving of oxygen because a) there's less oxygen in the atmosphere, and b) you can't use the oxygen that you do have and turn it into fuel which is the whole point of oxygen in the first place.  Exposure to millimeter waves, along with aluminum in the air, air pollution, fear, bad food, lots of things.  But millimeter waves is the new kid on the block.  And the third thing it does is that we know that it creates a hyper-inflammatory response, otherwise known as a cytokine storm, which is the body's way of getting rid of diseased tissue.  It's not a disease, but if you . . . basically, we're talking about radiation sickness.  So you radiate the tissue with millimeter waves, it breaks down, the body says "I have to get rid of this," it uses the same mechanism that we use to get rid of cigarette smoke or splinters.  You create an inflammatory response, which the unfortunate doctors, alternative and otherwise, say, "Oh, you have too much inflammation.  That's your disease."  Inflammation is your body's way of getting rid of dead and diseased tissue, but it can be so overwhelming that it actually kills you.  So you die from hypoxia and an over-enthusiastic inflammatory response and that is exactly what fits with COVID-19 from millimeter waves.  Now, I would point out that we have the epidemiology for this, we have the mechanism which I just went through, but people have criticized me for being very particular about viral causation.  We know that the virus has never been isolated, so you can't possibly know if caffeine is causing high blood pressure if you've never isolated the virus and never made any animal or person sick. So we know that's not the case, and I actually think we should do clear research to show once and for all whether millimeter waves, otherwise known as 5G, hypoxia and inflammatory, cytokine storms as basically the reason for this problem.  

CNN SCUM: Meltdown as They Attempt to Ban Dr. Mercola's Book on COVID-19

Living inside CNN’s head for free, watch the latest Anderson Cooper meltdown attempting to ban my book on Amazon. https://t.co/ZVAmQFFuKa

— Dr. Joseph Mercola (@mercola) October 5, 2021

The title is The Truth About Covid19: Exposing the Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal, Dr. Joseph Mercola, April 2021.

A strong immune system is your best mask. Vitamin D delivers that strong immunity. Fauci takes 8,000 to 9,000 IUs of vitamin D3

Thanks to Robert Wenzel.

This presentation is a full hour.  This YouTube version is only 29 minutes long.  To watch the full presentation, please open this Rumble link.  The presenter is pathologist and MD, Dr. Ryan Cole.  His credentials are here: 

Dr. Cole is a board-certified dermatopathologist (AP & CP) and the CEO/Medical Director of Cole Diagnostics. He has worked as an independent pathologist since 2004. Some highlights from his CV: Ackerman Academy of Dermatopathology (July 2002-June 2003): Dermatopathology Fellowship (Chief Fellow). Mayo Clinic (July 1997-June 2002): Resident in Anatomic and Clinical Pathology. Chief Fellow, Surgical Pathology Fellowship. Medical College of Virginia (1993-1997): Researched immunology. Served as President of Student Family Practice organization. Coordinated activities and seminars on the practice of family medicine and rural medicine. Earned MD in 1997.

Fauci takes 8,000 to 9,000 IUs of vitamin D3.  But what's his message?  Wear a mask, maybe two.  Why isn't his message to take 10,000IU of vitamin D?

Dr. Cole praises the effectiveness of Ivermectin, calling it an immune modulator and anti-viral medication.  And if anyone has had any one of the vaccines and experiences a cytokine storm, he says that Ivermectin may be your best choice for quelling that storm.  That, and vitamin D. 

"Tony Fauci couldn't possibly have made his claim, that COVID-19 is 10 times more deadly than the flu, with any scientific basis."

Give this a full listen when you have a chance. 

Robert Wenzel has been posting terrific updates and sound, meaning logical, latest news on the COVID-19 and the government enflaming the concern.  Wenzel writes

The [above] interview of Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor of medicine at Stanford University, by Peter Robinson, is awesome.

They begin by discussing the problems with current testing that I have been highlighting here and the fact that Trump's adviser Tony Fauci couldn't possibly have made his claim, that COVID-19 is 10 times more deadly than the flu, with any scientific basis.

Be sure to watch at least the first 9 minutes.

It is also good to know that Bhattacharya is about to start properly designed general population serological tests, which he discusses later in the clip. 

Until then, load up on vitamin D.

VITAMIN D SUPPLEMENTATION REDUCES THE RISK OF RESPIRATORY INFECTION [HINT: THAT'S THE COVID-19]

Secret weapon against coronavirus?https://t.co/WEQ7oxxvo7

— Fox News (@FoxNews) March 23, 2020

Thanks to Steve Bartin.

This should not come as a secret or a surprise to any visitors to this site.  Unfortunately, Former CDC Director, Tom Frieden was interviewed by John Roberts, long-time CBS Anchor.  The problem is that Roberts leads the questioning and the answers that Frieden gives are standard: stay at home, quarantine a person infected, etc., etc., etc., ad infinitum.  Is he talking to 6-year-olds?  Anyone old enough, from a 9-year-old child to an octogenarian, knows that if you're sick with anything that you stay home.  Now it is true that though high school kids may know this they don't heed this warning because they've got friends to attend to, they've got games and projects that need their hands on.  So it's true that some people need to have this message droned into their head, but if you're at all conscientious you're not going to want to get people sick and sabotage their productivity.  

So take your daily vitamin D for the reasons that Dr. Frieden states here,

Vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of respiratory infection, regulates cytokine production and can limit the risk of other viruses such as influenza. A respiratory infection can result in cytokine storms – a vicious cycle in which our inflammatory cells damage organs throughout the body – which increase mortality for those with COVID-19. Adequate Vitamin D may potentially provide some modest protection for vulnerable populations. 

Frieden is downplaying the effectiveness of vitamin D because as a former government agent, he has to stay on the plantation narrative of "shelter in place," "accept martial law," "self-quarantine," "wear a mask," "wash your hands," etc., etc., etc.  

Check out what Dr. John Cannell, owner of the Vitamin D Council site, has to say about what vitamin D does for you.  Then check out what Creighton University professor, Robert P. Heaney says about the protective effects of vitamin D, which go way beyond strengthening your immune system.  Need more evidence?  Scroll down this page about 2/3 to find other vitamin D experts to see what they say about what it does and how it can restore your health.  Like I said, I've covered the powerful effects of vitamin D several times.  It's too important a supplement not to have in your daily arsenal.  

I've had good results with this brand.  And the price is not bad either.

AUTHORITIES ARE UNABLE TO DISTINGUISH WHO DIED AS A RESULT OF [COVID-19] . . . OR OTHER SERIOUS DISEASES

In the commentary below, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee, discusses problems with the COVID-19 tests that are going on and the general panic surrounding the Coronavirus.  As of March 18, 2020, 1.2 million people have watched this presentation.

Thanks to Robert Wenzel and Karen DeCoster.  At TargetLiberty, Wenzel points out that 

that positive deceased patients have an average of over 80 years - 80.3 to be exact - and are essentially predominantly male (Women are just 25.8 percent).

And he noted:

The majority of the dead were carriers of chronic diseases.

At present, in fact, the authorities are unable to distinguish those who died as a result of the virus, from those who were mostly carriers of other serious diseases and who, therefore, would not have died from Covid-19," he said.

VIRUSES ARE LIKE LITTLE GREASE-NANOPARTICLES. SOAP DISSOLVES THE FAT MEMBRANE AND THE VIRUS FALLS APART OR BECOMES INACTIVE.

Here is an elegant explanation of why the simple but important task of washing your hands is effective in destroying germs, viruses, and bacteria. The pharmaceutical industry will claim that washing is not enough, that you will need some limousine prescription to fight that cold.  The following is a Twitter thread by Palli Thordarson, professor, School of Chemistry UNSW.  Bob Wenzel highlighted key points of the thread in [bold]:

1/25 Part 1 - Why does soap work so well on the SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus and indeed most viruses? Because it is a self-assembled nanoparticle in which the weakest link is the lipid (fatty) bilayer. A two-part thread about soap, viruses and supramolecular chemistry #COVID19

2/25 The soap dissolves the fat membrane and the virus falls apart like a house of cards and "dies", or rather, we should say it becomes inactive as viruses aren’t really alive. Viruses can be active outside the body for hours, even days.

3/25 Disinfectants or liquids, wipes, gels and creams containing alcohol (and soap) have similar effects but are not really quite as good as normal soap. Apart from the alcohol and soap, the “antibacterial agents” in these products don't affect the virus structure much at all.

4/25 Consequently, many antibacterial products are basically just an expensive version of soap in terms of how they act on viruses. Soap is the best but alcohol wipes are good when soap is not practical or handy (e.g. office receptions).

5/25 But why exactly is soap so good? To explain that, I will take you through a bit of a journey through supramolecular #chemistry, nanoscience, and virology. I try to explain this in generic terms as much as possible, which means leaving some specialist chemistry terms out.

6/25 I point out to that while I am expert in supramolecular chemistry and the assembly of nanoparticles, I am not a virologist. The image with the first tweet is from an excellent post here which is dense with good virology info:

7/25 I have always been fascinated by viruses as I see them as one of the most spectacular examples of how supramolecular chemistry and nanoscience can converge. Most viruses consist of three key building blocks: RNA, proteins, and lipids.

8/25 The RNA is the viral genetic material -it is very similar to DNA. The proteins have several roles including breaking into the target cell, assist with virus replication and basically to be a key building block (like a brick in a house) in the whole virus structure.

9/25 The lipids then form a coat around the virus, both for protection and to assist with its spread and cellular invasion. The RNA, proteins, and lipids self-assemble to form the virus. Critically, there are no strong “covalent” bonds holding these units together.

10/25 Instead the viral self-assembly is based on weak “non-covalent” interactions between the proteins, RNA, and lipids. Together these act together like a Velcro so it is very hard to break up the self-assembled viral particle. Still, we can do it (e.g. with soap!).

11/25 Most viruses, including the coronavirus, are between 50-200 nanometers – so they are truly nanoparticles. Nanoparticles have complex interactions with surfaces they are on. Same with viruses. Skin, steel, timber, fabric, paint, and porcelain are very different surfaces.

12/25 When a virus invades a cell, the RNA “hijacks” the cellular machinery like a computer virus (!) and forces the cell to start to makes a lot of fresh copies of its own RNA and the various proteins that make up the virus.

13/25 These new RNA and protein molecules, self-assemble with lipids (usually readily present in the cell) to form new copies of the virus. That is, the virus does not photocopy itself, it makes copies of the building blocks which then self-assemble into new viruses!

14/25 All those new viruses eventually overwhelm the cell and it dies/explodes releasing viruses which then go on to infect more cells. In the lungs, some of these viruses end up in the airways and the mucous membranes surrounding these.

15/25 When you cough, or especially when you sneeze, tiny droplets from the airways can fly up to 10 meters (30 ft)! The larger ones are thought to be main coronavirus carriers and they can go at least 2 m (7 ft). Thus – cover your coughs & sneezes people!

16/25 These tiny droplets end on surfaces and often dry out quickly. But the viruses are still active! What happens next is all about supramolecular chemistry and how self-assembled nanoparticles (like the viruses) interact with their environment!

17/25 Now it is time to introduce a powerful supramolecular chemistry concept that effectively says: similar molecules appear to interact more strongly with each other than dissimilar ones. Wood, fabric and not to mention skin interact fairly strongly with viruses.

18/25 Contrast this with steel, porcelain, and at least some plastics, e.g. Teflon. The surface structure also matters–the flatter the surface the less the virus will “stick” to the surface. Rougher surfaces can actually pull the virus apart.

19/25 So why are surfaces different? The virus is held together by a combination of hydrogen bonds (like those in water) and what we call hydrophilic or “fat-like” interactions. The surface of fibers or wood, for instance, can form a lot of hydrogen bonds with the virus.

20/25 In contrast steel, porcelain or Teflon do not form a lot of hydrogen bonds with the virus. So the virus is not strongly bound to these surfaces. The virus is quite stable on these surfaces whereas it doesn’t stay active for as long on say fabric or wood.

21/25 For how long does the virus stay active? It depends. The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is thought to stay active on favorable surfaces for hours, possibly a day. Moisture (“dissolves”), sunlight (UV light) and heat (molecular motions) all make the virus less stable.

22/25 The skin is an ideal surface for a virus! It is “organic” and the proteins and fatty acids in the dead cells on the surface interact with the virus through both hydrogen bonds and the “fat-like” hydrophilic interactions.

23/25 So when you touch, say, a steel surface with a virus particle on it, it will stick to your skin and hence get transferred onto your hands. But you are not (yet) infected. If you touch your face though, the virus can get transferred from your hands and on to your face.

24/25 And now the virus is dangerously close to the airways and the mucus type membranes in and around your mouth and eyes. So the virus can get in…and voila! You are infected (that is unless your immune system kills the virus).

25/25 If the virus is on your hands you can pass it on by shaking someone’s else hand. Kisses, well, that's pretty obvious…It comes without saying that if someone sneezes right in your face you are kind of stuffed. Part 2 about soap coming next (25 post limit reached)!

26/39 Part 2 about soap, supramolecular chemistry, and viruses. 

So how often do you touch your face? It turns out most people touch the face once every 2-5 minutes! Yeah, so you at high risk once the virus gets on your hands unless you can wash the active virus off.

27/39 So let’s try washing it off with plain water. It might just work. But water “only” competes with the strong “glue-like” interactions between the skin and virus via hydrogen bonds. The virus is quite sticky and may not budge. Water isn’t enough.

28/39 Soapy water is totally different.  Soap contains fat-like substances knowns as amphiphiles, some structurally very similar to the lipids in the virus membrane. The soap molecules “compete” with the lipids in the virus membrane. 

29/39 The soap molecules also compete with a lot of other non-covalent bonds that help the proteins, RNA and the lipids to stick together. The soap is effectively “dissolving” the glue that holds the virus together. Add to that all the water.

30/39 The soap also outcompetes the interactions between the virus and the skin surface. Soon the viruses get detached and fall apart like a house of cards due to the combined action of the soap and water. The virus is gone!

31/39 The skin is quite rough and wrinkly which is why you do need a fair amount of rubbing and soaking to ensure the soap reaches every crook and nanny on the skin surface that could be hiding active viruses.

32/39 Alcohol-based products, which pretty includes all “disinfectants” and “antibacterial” products contain a high-% alcohol solution, typically 60-80% ethanol, sometimes with a bit of isopropanol as well and then water + a bit of soap.

33/39 Ethanol and other alcohols do not only readily form hydrogen bonds with the virus material but as a solvent, are more lipophilic than water. Hence, alcohol does also dissolve the lipid membrane and disrupt other supramolecular interactions in the virus.

34/39 However, you need a fairly high concentration (maybe +60%) of the alcohol to get a rapid dissolution of the virus. Vodka or whiskey (usually 40% ethanol), will not dissolve the virus as quickly. Overall alcohol is not quite as good as soap at this task.

35/39 Nearly all antibacterial products contain alcohol and some soap and this does help killing viruses. But some also include “active” bacterial killing agents, like triclosan. Those, however, do basically nothing to the virus!

36/39 To sum up, viruses are almost like little grease-nanoparticles. They can stay active for many hours on surfaces and then get picked up by touch. They then get to our face and infect us because most of us touch the face quite frequently.

37/39 Water is not very effective alone in washing the virus off our hands. Alcohol-based products work better. But nothing beats soap – the virus detaches from the skin and falls apart very readily in soapy water.

38/39 Here you have it–supramolecular chemistry and nanoscience tell us not only a lot about how the virus self-assembled into a functional active menace but also how we can beat viruses with something as simple as soap.

39/39 Thank you for reading my first thread. Apologies for any mistakes in the above. I might have some virology details wrong here as I am not a virologist unlike @MackayIM who I am a big fan of! But I hope this inspires you not only to use soap but to read up on chemistry!