America Had the Most COVID Deaths in the World: "It's Hard to Understand Why Anthony Fauci Is a Hero"
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) March 21, 2023
• The U.S. has 4.2% of the global population — and almost 16% of worldwide COVID deaths.
• America had a COVID death rate of about 3,000 per million; Nigeria had a death rate… pic.twitter.com/lZB35aQfpp
Interesting. Dr. Bryan Ardis said that death totals in the U.S. were higher than 16%, that they were actually 24% of all COVID deaths.
Dr. Bryan Ardis: Man Has Discovered How to Punch Holes in the Blood-Brain Barrier
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) March 1, 2023
"The one part of the body God put the greatest protection around, man has figured out how to actually deteriorate it and punch holes in it to be able to deliver aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, any… https://t.co/cHz28AAcQd pic.twitter.com/aNfAqd6a1L
In May 2020 Dr Fauci lied about the 2019 Remdesivir Ebola trial in Africa and he lied about
— RefugeOfSinners (ROS) (@RefugeOfSinner5) February 11, 2023
the 3 month Remdesivir Covid trial March 2020.
It was approved.
Then Drs in New York said,
"We have never seen this amount of acute kidney failure when we treat a respiratory virus"
Hmmm pic.twitter.com/uqIAPoIEbj
This is Dr. Bryan Ardis' defense of his claim that COVID-19 is not a virus source, but rather it is snake venom poisoning. You'll have blood coagulation and anti-coagulation. The 19 in COVID-19 does not refer to 2019 as has been drilled into our heads. According to Ardis, the 19 refers to the 19 snake venom sequences.
He is being attacked in the blogosphere with everybody dismissing his claim that COVID-19 is a King Cobra venom poisoning. You may be tired of thinking or hearing about COVID-19, the spike proteins, Dr. Fauci, etc. But you should know that this claim is not new. And there is a way to stop the effects of venom poisoning in your body. The product? Nicotine. Because nicotine blocks the snake venom inside the spike protein and keeps it from lodging in nACH Receptors. He gives the etymology of the word virus. Apparently, the COVID-19 refers to Corona venom 19.
#coincidence https://t.co/BxOKFYABkF
— Jennifer Depew, RD (@deNutrients) April 13, 2022
Look. It AIN'T F*KCING SNAKE VENOM FOLKS.
— Walter M Chesnut (@Parsifaler) April 12, 2022
No need to keep sending me the video. I appreciate the enthusiasm and thought. I watched it.
However, IT MIMICS SNAKE VENOM. https://t.co/5IoPpvZGIy pic.twitter.com/nt3FuaI81J
One scientist I follow, Walter Chestnut, says that there is no snake venom per se, but rather the spike protein ACTS like snake venom. Chestnut calls the protein an epitope, which are antigens that
And by this, I mean it's common epitopes that mimic. Not literal snake venom. Absurd.
— Walter M Chesnut (@Parsifaler) April 12, 2022
Good to know that there are remedies to snake venom poisoning.
Cobra venom protein sequence in C19, possibly the med. that begins with R. Be ready when time comes. Beware the V. This Tweet needs no warning, it is a warning. pic.twitter.com/q5CbqzZxdz
— DCGreenZone1 (@DCGreenZone) April 12, 2022
It's important to take nicotine lozenges. Why? Because nicotine blocks the snake venom inside the spike protein and keeps it from lodging in nACH Receptors.
*switched to lozenges. The patch can cause skin irritation https://t.co/HDBsGNrFi2
— Jennifer Depew, RD (@deNutrients) April 12, 2022
Dr. Ardis is one of the American doctors
Bioweapon is designed to target heart and muscle tissue. The only authorizied drug to
19:54 The mRNA vaccines dramatically increase 1) heart inflammation leading to myocarditis, 2) increasing blood clot disorders, 3) increasing heart disease, 4) increasing strokes and other cardiovascular events immediately following the vaccines. And they published the resulting damage to the heart after the Pfizer shot, we are observing as the American Heart Association, that they're seeing that these are long-lasting side effects and they're staying for at least two and a half months after the second shot. So this is their warning. So the spike proteins, just so you know, judge, jury . . . have been designed to target and stop hearts of people around the world. Remdesivir is known to cause heart failure, kidney failure, liver failure, which causes death and increases death and likelihoods of mortality with the drug Remdesivir.
20:47 "The vaccines are," published by the American Heart Association "to directly cause heart attacks, strokes, and blood clots. That's what it does. The entire plandemic, the entire plandemic and the medical protocols and then restricting certain drugs like chloroquine that Anthony Fauci said was proven to be cardiotoxic, leading to death of COVID-19 patients in May of 2020, I just showed you The Cardiovascular Toxicology Journal says that Remdesivir is FAR MORE heart toxic than Chloroquine. Yet two months later, the FDA ignores that. The NIH ignores that. Then in December they go ahead and publish their updates. And the update is "Only Remdesivir is FDA approved." Still. There is an outright attempt to murder people and kill people, and they are going after the elderly first. Now they're targeting the young, and I'm going to show you, and this is when I showed them, and this is when Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, and if you just watch his face, he couldn't believe it. And I know the world needed to know it, so I needed to take the world's audience through this.
21:50 With all the information I've given to you about Remdesivir and its toxic effects on the human body, the FDA in America on January 21, 2022, just three weeks ago, now has authorized, and I pulled up the document and I read the title, "The FDA Is Now Extending the Emergency Use Authorization" and they're saying that Remdesivir is the only authorized to treat all COVID-19 pediatric-age people. And it says, right here in the title, "It starts with newborns 7 pounds heavy." So any baby, 3.5 kilograms, and anyone older than that . . . . I said, so now they're taking babies, who are born to women in hospitals, are taking them to the nursery and they tell you to PCR test them. If it comes back positive, insert intravenously and pump that baby three days full of Remdesivir. And then it says, in the actual EUA, there is no alternative approved treatment for pediatric patients except for Remdesivir. And I said, "I have to make the world know what it says in here because it is only an emergency use authorization, not an approval by the FDA. And it says that. So I took them through, and your audience should know this too.
So you're going to have babies; they're going to come out looking normal, and when they turn 18, 19, 20-years-old, they're not going to have any eggs to actually get pregnant with because these chemicals in these shots are known to be toxic to the developing eggs inside the ovaries of the developing females, . . .
The title of this video is Depopulation
by Any Means: Dr. Bryan Ardis, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg.
At the 23:17 mark, Dr. Aris refers everybody to Thomas Renz's site. America's Front Line Doctors. MyFreeDoctor.com.
32:00 Lawsuit filed on July 19 against the federal government was an injunction to stop the EUA of the vaccines. Because one of the reporting services for CMS, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, there was a whistleblower who came forward and her statistical review of the data--just in CMS--shows from just 3 days after the shot is 45,000 deaths in that database alone. And they have not extended the search out yet to 4 days post-vaccine, 5 days post-vaccine but they're going to do it. That's what this actual lawsuit is about.
The important thing is that in the FDA document published on October 22, 2020, they actually stated that they were going to be doing a rapid assessment of reporting coming in from injuries from the vaccines. And they were going to be using this and they stated in that FDA document, "We're going to be trusting the CMS data to give us the best information that we can relay to the American public on these vaccines being safe and effective." Do you know what system that was? The CMS system and no one ever talked about that 45,000 deaths that were reported in the first 3 days of the shot reported into Medicare, which is typically the older generation in America, and Medicaid which are the impoverished individuals in America in just that 1 out of 11 reporting systems. VAERS reported over 12,000 which is the reporting system into the Health and Human Services. This whistleblower said that all of the numbers being reported are off by a factor of five. She's a mathematician, 25 years of doing algorithm and health databases. She said that the total count is off by a factor of FIVE.
34:00 Dr. Zelenko, Dr. Mercola, they're all convinced that the counting is off by TEN or even a HUNDRED times. About these reporting systems, the University of Harvard in 2010 did a review of all reporting systems on vaccine injuries into the United States' agencies. After a 3-year review, they found that it is less than 1%. I hear that doctors and other people in the media that the counting is upwards of only 10% or less. No, it's not. The actual number in the document from Harvard Pilgrim--it's less than 1% of all reported. So it doesn't matter what number you hear reported on deaths, it doesn't matter how many miscarriages or demyelinating diseases, or auto-immune diseases or Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), or how many hundreds now of Bell's Palsy that's been reported, you can add 2 ZEROS for every one of those figures to get close to what Harvard said is the actual data.
35:35 VIVIANE FISCHER Because some people [meaning medical care workers, people who do the reporting] think that they are with the vaccination program performing a vital and valuable service on behalf of society, that they might not report the adverse effects of the vaccines for fear of its disasters could bring the vaccine campaign to a halt. We had problems too at a convalescent home in Berlin, where out of 13 people who were vaccinated 8 died. That was never reported. I mean who died shortly after vaccination.
ARDIS In that document from Harvard, it actually states that the #1 cause for underreporting was that the medical professionals didn't know anything about the [reporting] system. #2 was that if they wrote it down in their records, the doctor would have to go down to the VAERS data system and actually report it a second time and it got in the way of the workflow experience in the office for the doctors. When Harvard approached the CDC at the end of the 3 years, they asked them to allow Harvard to help them develop a better system of reporting. The CDC took the consultant away from the Harvard Review study and told them, "No more that we're going to assist Harvard and all in that initiative." So there's been no change since then. And I will say that you guys have had some frontline American doctors on there, Dr. Lee Merritt, who said that it was very obvious that a patient who had just received a vaccine, a teenager, immediately went into Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). And she looked at the doctor who was trying to get the teenager up onto the gurney and this doctor is the one who is treating this patient, she said, "When did she receive her vaccine?"
DOCTOR: It was just an hour earlier.
38:00 And she said, "This is Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). This is the first listed side-effect on the FDA's guide in October. And she looked at the doctor, who is a colleague of hers, and asked, "Are you going to report this to VAERS?"
And his response was, "What's VAERS?"
So, yes, there is a huge amount of underreporting, for sure. I would suspect, for sure, based on this whistleblower coming out, that Thomas Renz has filed this lawsuit on behalf of America's Frontline Doctors, that when it's a factor of FIVE, you have to estimate that it's at least a [factor of] TEN. For sure, the actual numbers are 45,000 just within 3 days of getting the shots.
WOLFGANG WODARG: I just spoke about the incentives for the doctors to tell something or not to tell it. And that depends on what to charge for it and it depends on whether they feel they have made a mistake, then they would not like to say it. If they gave a vaccination, they would not like so much to tell it to anybody if something happens. So there are such problems, which distort all statistics, and we have to keep this in mind. And I mam very sure that we have much more side effects with this so-called vaccination than we have in the numbers and the statistics in all administrations
39:30 In Germany, it wouldn't be just the doctor who does the vaccination who would need to report this but if a doctor has a patient, just what we heard earlier from Ardis, so if someone comes to the doctor and says, "I just had a vaccination, and I have a rash or headache or something, the doctor at a vaccination clinic would also have to report in fact.
40:35 On the FDA slide #16, in October 22, 2020, there is a side effect listed on there. It is called Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in Children, MIS-C, a brand new disease that's only been created and given a diagnostic code since 2020. We all know that COVID, or SARS-CoV-2, was a very little threat to children and to pregnant women. We already knew that. but there were very rare occurrences where the spike protein of the Coronavirus could create this Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in Children. It's a known side effect of the vaccine. The FDA knew it. by definition, if you look up the Mayo Clinic's definition of what Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in Children, it is a severe inflammation of multiple organs in the body, including the brain, the kidneys, the spleen, the gastrointestinal tract, the eyes, the skin. This is all part of that. If you look up complications on their definition of this actual syndrome, it can be deadly. Now, in VAERS, I have not seen a single one of these reported into VAERS, but if you go to CDC.gov.com, there are already reports recorded since the shots have started. There have already been 4,200 cases reported to the CDC of occurrences of Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in Children, and already over 40 deaths of children, reported to the CDC. [Ardis does not touch on the fact that since June 2020, scores of cases of Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in adults, MIS-A, in adults have also been reported. Oh, God.] And this is what you want to push on all the masses of children in America and across the world to allow them to go to school? I find this atrocious and disgusting. And everyone needs to know that this is a known side-effect because the mRNA, and the spike protein in the shots or anything else that might be in those shots, are going to cause this debilitating, horrible reaction of inflammation in multiple organs at one time in the body of children. There have been trials by, like Stanford. Stanford has been setting up a study to allow vaccination of 6-month-olds, 2-year-olds, so you're seeing some of these being given to children, pushed out to children. So these have actually already started to be corresponded (meaning that they're being recorded and evaluated?).
TRANSMISSION
44:00 Also, you're going to see what Wolfgang can talk about: transmission, shedding from the vaccinated parents to their children. Oh, God. You're seeing reports that all MIS-C started spiking. You can actually look on CDCgov, the spike for MIS-C starts in December 2020, spikes in January, and continues to go up. The chart below is a 7-day moving average.
45:15 I call it transmission, you call it shedding, but when you put in 50 billion particles of mRNA, you're going to get 50 billion spike proteins. You're going to get more than that in antibodies. And the human body is going to start to shed these things. You're going to transmit it through coughing, through sweating, through urine, through semen. You have to excrete it out of your body, this is not healthy; it's an overabundance of immune reactions. So the body is going to try to shed the spike proteins, it's going to try to shed the antibodies. We already know how detrimental these antibodies are. The antibodies themselves have already been proven with the Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca shot, those actual antibodies against double-stranded DNA, which is what is in those shots--the transgenes--we already know they cause Systemic lupus erythematosus, which I referenced earlier. You're going to see auto-immune diseases come from the shots. You're going to see the shedding of antibodies and spike proteins in other people. It's just a horrible thing. They knew this was going to happen. It's in the FDA documents, and the FDA logo is on every slide. These side-effects are permanent and lifelong?
48:00 When we came out in October of 2020 with the FDA document myocarditis was listed as one of the known side effects. Now, what are you hearing reported by all the teenagers that are now being given the shots? You're hearing hundreds of thousands of reports of myocardidits. And some of these athletes and teenagers are dying in high schools, high school ages. But the FDA already knew this. What's incredible to me is that the FDA said this week, "Because of the concerns about myocarditis in children before they start putting this into all children in America, we want Pfizer literally to expand how many children they put in the trial. Why would you want to give any more children a shot that is causing myocarditis, whether it's in a trial of any kind or to the masses? Why would you encourage any more children, or risk their life for health, over an experimental shot?
49:40 Also, all pregnant women need to beware--there is polyethylene glycol 2000 in the Pfizer and Moderna shots; there's polysorbate 80 in the Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca shots; there's graphene oxide that's been determined to be inside of the Pfizer shot. If you're pregnant with a female baby, there are two trimesters in which the female body's ovaries, inside your baby, will be creating all the eggs it will ever have for its whole life. Infertility that's going to be coming from this is not in this generation--your babies are going to be born unable to have children of their own. So you're going to have babies; they're going to come out looking normal, and when they turn 18, 19, 20-years-old, they're not going to have any eggs to actually get pregnant with because these chemicals in these shots are known to be toxic to the developing eggs inside the ovaries of the developing females. So you're going to look back and say, "You know what--that shot didn't cause any harm to my child. I got the vaccines when I was pregnant with you. At 10-years-old, you're fine; at 20-years-old, you're fine; and then you go to get pregnant and try to have children, you never will be able to. This is a great attempt to try to sterilize and infertilize the world, it appears. Every pregnant woman should be warned that they should never take these shots. Outside of the miscarriages that are being reported within days of the shots, think about the baby inside.
51:38 Two things should be disturbing to people, I think, especially in America. We've been raised to trust this one agency to do its due diligence, to approve things to be safe and effective medically. That's called the FDA. They do this FDA approval process. Why in the world has any American been okay with the fact that they mandated, the NIH didn't, Anthony Fauci didn't, a never FDA-approved to be the only treatment for COVID? It has been FDA-approved in October only after they already killed 500,000 Americans. But it was never FDA approved when the pandemic started because the Ebola study proved that it was not safe and effective, and the FDA was not going to approve it. Why then the next step--a vaccine that's never been tried on humans before. And it's never been FDA-approved. Why in the world did we drop all common sense and respect for what we thought was an agency that was doing some kind of review on medical devices and drugs to determine if they were safe and effective? Why didn't we just throw that out the window and just trust you to just throw anything you want at us? They've used every cultic tactic that they could think of through the media. 53:00
Thanks to Walter Riley @ Lew Rockwell.
In May 2020, when Fauci and the NIH put out their mandates for treating hospitalized patients, I knew that based on the drug they assigned hospitals to use in their protocols to treat COVID patients, Remdesivir, would turn out to be Fauci's genocide.
3:50 It was going to be how Antony Fauci was going to kill hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of Americans in hospitals treated around the country and I have not gotten off of this ever since.
The truth is that in the memo when Fauci stated was that there was one drug and one drug only that "was found to be effective and a viral trial against Ebola virus a years earlier. And this experimental, anti-viral drug, called Remdesivir, that at that time had never been FDA approved, he said it was proven safe and effective against the Ebola virus and that now we were going to use it in America as the only treatment for all hospitalized, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 infected people.
And so I had never heard of Remdesivir, but I had selected the actual hyperlink on NIH.gov's website, the National Institutes of Health, and this is important for . . . you mentioned you have audiences all around the country--it really doesn't matter how big your audience is or how small it is or where it is. It doesn't matter if there is only 1 person in that audience, they all have loved ones and family members--they all need to be warned of this same message, so I was going to take on and have been ever since, to take on any audience no matter how big their platform is to warn as many people as possible of the ill-advised protocols that were going to do more harm and cause more death than the SARS-CoV-2 infection by itself, and that still stands true a year and a half later.
On the May 1st, 2020 memo, Fauci claimed that the Remdesivir, on the Ebola trial, proved it to be safe and effective against the Ebola virus, this drug called Remdesivir. So I clicked the link to read the study, which I've read studies for the last 20 years being in practice, only to find out that not only was the drug not found to be safe, it definitely was not found to be effective. It was the least effective and had the highest death rate of the 4 experimental drugs that were in that trial.
5:50 So halfway through this trial with the Ebola patients in Africa, the Safety Independent Board found that Remdesivir had a mortality rate of 53.1%. In fact, it was the only drug that had a death rate of over half of everyone they gave it to. So the drug was found to be so dangerous that the Independent Board in August 2019 pulled Remdesivir from the study and said "No other Africans could get this drug. It wasn't safe or effective against the Ebola virus." It was only proven to be the most deadly. Then I knew Antony Fauci was lying in his memo that he sent out to all hospitals that this was the only drug that you're going to use. Don't use anything else, like Hydroxychloroquine in the memo. He goes on to state in that memo that Hydroxychloroquine was proven in COVID-19 patients to cause heart attacks and deaths, so it's not approved for COVID-19. And I just thought that was odd because Hydroxychloroquine has been approved for 70 years, safe and effective over the world, over-the-counter safe for most of the world. So I knew something was wrong with that, but I didn't care about that as much as I wanted to know more about Remdesevir.
7:00 So I learned very quickly in the New England Journal of Medicine from the Ebola virus trial that Anthony Fauci LIED. Remdesivir was not safe and effective against the Ebola Virus, so then I wanted to know what else he was lying about, so I clicked the 2nd study that he was referencing and this was called a cohort study, totally funded and carried out by Gilead, which owns Remdesivir's patent. And in March 2020, Gilead decided to treat 53 people from Japan, Canada, and America that were COVID-19 positive. And they gave them the Remdesivir drug for 10 days. And this is significant because the Ebola trial was published in December 2019. Just 3 months later, in March 2020, Gilead is going to give Remdesivir to a new trial COVID group with 53 people. In the Ebola trial, they gave Remdesivir for 28 days and the other drugs. And at 28 days, Remdesivir was found to be the deadliest of the 4 experimental drugs. So now 3 months after that Ebola trial is wrapped up and is finished, in March 2020, Gilead is like let's just give these COVID-19 patients, 53 of them, 10 days of Remdesivir, and see what happens. And their actual conclusions were 23% of all 53 people they gave the drug to, Remdesivir for 10 days, 23% of them had acute kidney failure, liver failure, multiple organ failure, 8% had to be taken off the drug by Day 10 because they had such severe liver failure or kidney failure; they needed kidney transplants, they were doing to die. That's 31% of everybody they put that drug on in that 53-person trial. Now he lied about the efficacy of the Ebola trial. Now I know this drug is super dangerous and causes acute kidney failure in 30% of everyone you give that drug to. And then 2 months later, on May 1, 2020, Anthony Fauci is saying that this is the one proven drug, safe and effective for all Americans, and I knew he was lying, and I knew he was setting up a hospital protocol with a very dangerous drug, called Remdesivir, not proven safe or effective. And that this one drug was going to be the cause of most deaths from supposedly COVID-19, that they would call COVID-19 deaths in hospitals, when in fact it was death by Remdesivir poisoning. Remdesivir causes acute kidney failure in 30% of everybody you give it to within 5 days. What happens then when you have someone on an IV bag, you continue to fill their body with water, their kidneys are diseased and shut down, they can't excrete water from the body in the form of urine. So your bowels retain the water, then water goes and surrounds your heart, and then it floods into your lungs and you're drowning these people to death, and in every hospital in America, they're drowning your loved ones to death by shutting down their kidneys, flooding their lungs with water, and you're calling it Secondary COVID Pneumonia, and it is not. And since May 2020, I've been telling every loved one of anyone in the hospital from here on out--you need to make sure the hospital does a sputum test to determine if it's really bacterial or viral pneumonia they're saying that your loved one has and if they're saying it's not hospital protocol, you know they're lying to you about the pneumonia. That IS hospital protocol. It's the only way you define if it's viral or bacterial pneumonia. There's no other way: an X-Ray is not definitive for pneumonia. But that's all they're doing, so they're getting away with lying to you, when in fact, they have pulmonary edema. They flooded your loved one's lungs with water with a drug proven to shut down your kidneys.
10:35 Just so you know, I have been in the media non-stop ever since. And I've been telling people to avoid hospitals at all costs. Stay home.
Let's use some common sense here. How many people around the world, Sir, have been infected with COVID-19, and what is the death rate from that infection?
I don't have the exact number.
ARDIS: It's less than 1% of the entire world. But the mortality rate, the death rate of Remdesivir in the Ebola trial when they gave that drug, 53% of all people died on that drug. Why would you select a drug that had a higher mortality rate than the infection you decided to treat. Let me tell you right now that Anthony Fauci in May 2020, asked our federal government to buy up all the reserves of Remdesivir from Gilead, and then asked our federal government not to share Remdesivir with another country until the end of 2020.
Do you want to know why at the end of 2020 America had 550,000 dead Americans and no other country was even close to that death total? Because we were the only country that had the majority of 95% of their COVID patients/victims they died in hospitals, in ICUs, and in those ICU's they were only treating them with Remdesivir. No other country was doing. They were poisoning all Americans with this drug, convincing all of Americans that it's a deadly COVID infection, and it never was. It was a deadly poison drug in hospitals that they were using to kill you. And then they needed that narrative that [COVID] was deadly because they needed to sell you on the coming vaccines as a savior. And they needed the American population to buy into it. At the end of 2020, we had 550,000 dead. We only have 4.5% of the world's population. 95% of humans live outside the U.S. But at the end of 2020, the entire world, 7 billion-plus people have had COVID-19 go in and out of them. And American which has 4.5% of the world's population, had 25% of all dead COVID-19 people in the world. How is that possible? How did we have 25% of all COVID-19 deaths? We only have 4% of the entire world's population. I thought this thing was super deadly around the whole world. The only thing that was different was that America was using Remdesivir to poison people in hospitals. They never died from COVID-19. They died from kidney failure, liver failure, secondary lung, pulmonary edema. And when your lungs fill with water, they have to put you on a vent to force air into your lungs and they're just drowning your loved ones to death and that's what they've been doing. 13:27
It’s easy to find protocols to take
for someone who has COVID: vitamin D, C, and zinc, for the most part. And depending on severity, one can up the
dose on the D and the C, but go easy on the zinc. Then there are the prescription drugs—Ivermectin,
and others.
But I selected this interview
because I was interested in what folks who’ve been vaccinated can take to
address, or redress, some of the symptoms that they’re experiencing, like
shortness of breath, heart problems, liver problems, and others. Find other resources by Dr. Bryan Ardis here. The lymphatic system is attached to your sinus pressure. If that pressure is there, he recommends taking Milk Thistle. It improves the infection by removing the mucous. If ALT aline aminotransferase goes up? Milk Thistle and Hepatrophin PMG. Ardis says if your lower leg is swelling it's your liver shutting down that can cause blood stagnation. He says that the body takes 2 to 3 months to repair tissue damage. Post-infection, post-hospital stay, post-vaccine. Taurine improves heart function, hair, and nerve function. Your kidneys need 2 things; phosphoric acid and AC Carbamide. Standard Process.
Find more resources from Dr. Ardis here.
UPDATE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 31, 2023
The video embedded here has been removed from YouTube, and when I first tried to relocate it I couldn't find it and so thought that it was gone for good. But that's not true. Someone else uploaded it. Here is that video from Vokalnow. But what I did do with the original is that I did transcribe much of Dr. Ardis' and Michelle Rowton's conversation that you can see and read below. She has a healthcare provider for children, kind of neat, called wmwsanctuary. Check it out.
Dr. Ardis interviews Attorney Thomas Renz https://t.co/5vu6Kc408S
— Mike Walgenbach (@mwalgen44) September 20, 2021
Dr. Ardis has a site here. At the beginning of the interview, he referenced this site, called myfreedoctor.com.
You’ll see them put you on a
feeding tube or an IV and people will think that with the IV their loved one is
getting what you need. Except that you’re
not getting any calories in that IV. If
you’re not getting any calories, you’re not eating. If they don’t have a feeding tube in or
calories through the IV, you’re not being fed.
So they’re starving you to death.
And if your body is too weak from
no nutrients, you know this, all my doctors are telling me this, if you don’t
eat, you’re weak. And if you’re weak and
you’re sick, well, you’re going to die. Really one of the most egregious things ever.
Palliative care. They’ll take someone who’s still got a chance
of turning it around and they’ll put you on palliative care. Palliative care in a hospital means they’re
preparing you for death. If you let them
put you on palliative care, it basically means they’re going to quit treating
your loved one in any shape or form and they’re just going to prepare them to
die. So once you put them on palliative
care, the odds of you turning them around are roughly zero.
So you’ve got to advocate for your
loved ones in the hospital. They’re
killing people right and left. And they’re
doing it because Fauci and his crew of monsters, these garbage scumbags at NIH
and CDC they’re pushing these protocols for hospitals to murder people. Because then they can drive up the death
numbers from what is essentially the flu.
Don’t let them lie to you: palliative care is going to make your sister,
brother, mother better. it’s we’re going
to get them ready to die comfortably.
10:15 Palliative care is “we’re going to put your
loved one on hospice. We’re just going
to let them go peacefully, attend to them once or twice a day, etc. . . .
“You need to consider putting him
on a morphine drip which reduces his pain and . . . ."
ICUs use morphine, not as
palliative care, this is how they kill and murder your loved ones because morphine,
an opioid that paralyzes the diaphragm and stops your loved one from breathing,
and over time, say a 2 to 4 hour period, the length of a morphine drip, that
morphine is going to paralyze the heart’s ability to beat, and you will
die. This is what their palliative care
is. 11:43 It’s not palliative care. If you’re annoying enough, they’ll want to
kill you to get rid of you from the hospital because you’ve become
annoying. There’s no bigger time for you
to become annoying if you’ve watched my show on September 1st with Michelle Rowton. She had to fight to get
her dad out of the hospital during COVID.
She drove an hour and a half to Dallas and the night-time supervisor
told her “Can we just wait until the morning to get your dad out of here?”
What kind of mentality do you have to have to get the hospitals to listen to you?
She said, “I had to be a raging bitch.” You need to become a defender of that loved one’s life.
Michelle Rowton is excellent, particularly her listing out the sequence of steps to advocate for your loved one at a hospital. I'd wished I'd known these steps almost 12 years ago when my mother passed. Her stories about advocacy are priceless and start at the 58-minute mark. If this video gets removed, the title of it is "Dr. Ardis interviews Michelle Rowton, MS, Neonatal Practioner, and Patient Advocate."
HOSPITAL CHAIN OF COMMAND
The first thing--ask for the Charge Nurse. Tell her that you are not okay with your loved one being alone. We ARE going to have a visitor in her room 24 hours a day, and I need you to contact your next chain of command and get back to me in 40 minutes. It's easy to deal with people not in person. Start with the Charge Nurse.
Next up the chain of command
is the Nursing Manager. Above her is the Director. Above him is the
Administration. So you just keep going up the chain of
command.
At night or on weekends, it goes:
Charge Nurse > House Supervisor [the busiest person in the hospital at all times] (because there's no Nursing Manager there), then to Administration. Offer a 12 to 24-hour turnover for visitors.
USE THESE APPROPRIATE WORDS
"I am uncomfortable. My father is not safe in your facility. You have committed medical kidnapping. And I am not getting informed consent for medical procedures because nobody is calling me or if they are, I haven't actually been with this person to give informed consent because informed consent also involves eyes and we all know that, and if we can't get this taken care of in the next couple of hours I have already contacted my family's team of lawyers to help me handle this for me."
Hospitals actually have PATIENT ADVOCATES, and they are required to post a phone number, a contact number around the hospital that you can call so that if you feel like you're being bullied or you're not having good medical care or that you're not being listened to, they have to provide you with a private patient advocate.
Well, why would I even bother with that if they're hired by the hospital to begin with?
Her answer is this: most people don't know that that exists. So just by asking for that makes everybody perk up especially to legal consequences. Because anytime you have somebody actually requesting a patient advocate from the hospital, you have a very high chance that this situation is going to go to litigation if you don't get it chilled out quick. And at that point, I tell them, "If all of this does not work, I have hired my own private advocate. This is her name. And so we will do this by conference, but she is also willing to come by the hospital as well." She says she's only had to go up to a hospital NICU twice in 8 years. IF they get down to the nitty-gritty and say I've hired Michelle Rowton as my patient advocate,
It took her 56 hours to get her dad out of the hospital. 65% of that hospital was empty.
