Showing posts with label Toby Rogers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Toby Rogers. Show all posts

Sunday, January 25, 2026

The biological colonial argument that Jeffrey alluded to goes something like this.  For the last 500 years, if you are a nation that wanted to get rich, the way you did it was you'd build a bunch of ships, load them full of soldiers and guns and horses, and you'd sail from Europe to the new world, and you took their stuff you took their gold, you enslaved their people, you forced people to work in the gold mines, and that sort of thing.  That's how Europe got rich.  That's how the UK got rich.  And so that's the historical pattern for 500 years.  500 years of colonialism.  And then later there was neo-colonialism with unfair trade deals that kept enriching Europe and the United States and then more recently with the backing of the US Military we can get 3rd world nations to produce stuff for us at low cost that make us feel rich.  At some point, here's the problem at some point there were no new lands left to conquer what the so what the ruling class decided was that where the money is the peasants to be exploited were the middle class in the United States and throughout the developed world and how do you extract well from the middle class you do it through iatrogenic injury so if you can get the entire population to inject their kids 72 times during childhood and then get all the rest of the population and the kids to take covid shots and you can injure them you can enslave them for life to chronic illness so in my research I showed that autism lifetime care costs for autism are in the range of $5 million to $7 million per kid.  It goes to the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital industrial complex, and the ruling class.  And so with COVID shots what we have is . . . so picture a middle-aged woman in Orange County, California

Over the next 5 to 10 years of her life, her healthcare costs are going to be in the range of $2 million, and that all goes to Pharma, doctors, and other services under the pharma-industrial complex.

If this same woman was enslaved in a gold mine in South America, you could only get about $20,000 worth of labor out of her at the most, if you worked her to the bone and she would eventually perish.  The old model of colonialism, right?  But in 5 to 10 years in the U.S., you can squeeze $2 million out of this one person through iatrogenic in jury, through a COVID shot that causes myocarditis that sends her in and out of the hospital for 10 years of treatment.  So the insurance company pays, the government pays, she mortgages her house, her family pays, it extracts all wealth out of her and her family, and then after 10 years the pharmaceutical industry allows her to perish.  So the crisis that we're in right now and why we're all just traumatized all the time is that Western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth out of the middle class, the working class, and the lower classes in the United States to enrich the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury.  That's the crisis we're in right now.  It was already happening with autism and other chronic illnesses in children before, and then it just blossomed in size during the COVID epidemic and the response and the junk science COVID shots.

Thursday, January 30, 2025

"A healthy person has a thousand dreams, a sick person has only one."

from Toby Rogers

Democrats think that the key to healthcare is "access". But the proper question is "access to what?" If you have access to a doctor who is going to poison you in return for a kickback from Big Pharma, then access is worse than nothing at all. That's the system that we have now. 

And

I'll say this: Democratic Senators are definitely NOT shouting at the CEOs who are poisoning kids — Big Pharma, Big Pesticide, Big Food, and Big Plastic. Nope, they are shouting at the guy who is actually trying to keep toxic chemicals out of kids' bodies.
🤔

 
 

Friday, June 3, 2022

Who needs data when you’ve got regulatory capture?

From Dr. Meryl NassMay 30, 2022

Toby Rogers @ substack, "FDA Announces Updated Schedule for June Meetings Regarding Five Pivotal Vaccine Decisions," Toby Rogers, May 28, 2022

Who needs data when you’ve got regulatory capture?

I. The June FDA meetings

This week the Washington Post copied and pasted from a Pfizer press release to announce yet another scientific miracle(TM) that will completely fail in practice. In the process WaPo also got some quotes from the FDA who have now nailed down the schedule for the 4 meetings in June in which they intend to assemble the final pieces for Pharma’s permanent dominance over the American people.

THE NEW VACCINE SCHEDULE IS AS FOLLOWS

June 7, Novavax 
June 14, Moderna in kids 6 to 17 years old
June 15, Moderna in kids 6 months to 5 years AND Pfizer in kids 6 months to 4 years
June 28, “Future Framework” (the plan to skip clinical trials in perpetuity)

There is a lot to parse in the WaPo’s brief article.

Contrary to the breathless headline, THEY STILL DON'T HAVE ANY DATA. 

Pfizer and BioNTech said the 80 percent efficacy finding was preliminary and based on 10 cases of Covid-19 in the study population as of the end of April.  Once 21 cases have occurred, the companies will conduct a more formal analysis of efficacy . . . Pfizer and BioNTech said they plan to finish filing data with the FDA this week—and warned that the efficacy number was fluid because results are still arriving.

Let’s recap how we got here:

🚩 The Pfizer clinical trial in kids under 5 failed in December 2021.

🚩 So Pfizer added a third dose and that trial also apparently failed in February (which is why Pfizer was forced to withdraw its application on February 10).

🚩 Now Pfizer is describing a jerry-rigged trial of a third dose in 1,678 kids ages 6 months to four years old. Pfizer did not disclose how the kids were divided between the treatment and control group so it is impossible to run our own calculations on efficacy. Out of that sample, 10 developed Covid — although it is not clear how the 10 were distributed between the    treatment and control group. (I suppose some quant on Twitter will figure out how to work backwards from Pfizer’s claims to calculate the numbers in each of these categories but needless to say, this is not the proper way to do science.) Of course Pfizer also failed to describe the contents of the “placebo.”

As always with “publication by press release” the announcement raised more questions than answers:

“the efficacy finding was preliminary”; just 10 cases; “the companies will conduct a more formal analysis” next month; “the efficacy number was fluid because results are still arriving” — so you’re saying that these numbers are NOT statistically significant and in fact you have no
valid “results” at all? Got it.

How exactly will Pfizer double the number of Covid-19 cases in the clinical trial in the next month given that 74.2% of kids already had natural immunity in February which means that nearly 100% of children likely have natural immunity by now?

Also, is the FDA seriously considering basing national policy, that impacts 18 million children, by relying on a study with only 10 cases?  It appears that the FDA is not even pretending to care about science anymore.

What’s perhaps most troubling about this so-called clinical trial is that Pfizer is NOT looking at health outcomes in the real world (because there are none). Instead, all of their claims are based on antibodies in the blood. That’s strange because the members of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee unanimously acknowledged on April 6 that there are “no correlates of protection” in connection with Covid-19 shots (this means that there are no valid proxy measures, such as antibody counts, that can determine whether someone who has received this shot is immune to the virus or not.)

WaPo dutifully copied Pfizer’s disingenuous description:

While the adult trials recruited tens of thousands of volunteers and waited to see if vaccinated people were better protected, the children’s vaccine trials were primarily designed to measure immune responses using blood tests

No they were not “primarily designed to measure immune responses using blood tests.” The studies were intentionally undersize to hide harms from the shots in addition to other tricks that they use to skew the results (such as kicking you out of the trial if you call 911 or go to the emergency room). But when one shrinks the sample size, surprise! it becomes impossible to detect actual health benefits from the shots (the signal would have been tiny if at all, but when one uses a sample that small then any
positive signal can also disappear into statistical insignificance.) . . . 

Click here for the full report.