1,800 [NIH] scientists had taken $193 million dollars in royalties

3:42  I think all of America should be appalled that America’s doctor, the leading expert on COVID and public health doesn’t want to divulge information, doesn't want to divulge his communications with Big Tech. But it goes even beyond that. The last time I had him in a hearing, we told him that through FOI that 193 NIH scientists . . . no, it was 1,800 scientists had taken $193 million dollars in royalties. And his response was, “Not that I’ll look into it and reveal it,” but his response was “By law, we don’t have to tell you which companies gave us how many royalties and to which scientists.” So, this is a guy whose modus operandi is to cover up and not allow any sunshine on any of his activities. That should be a tip off as to his motives.”

It sure does. And we’re going to get a good look at those emails and if he doesn’t comply, he has to pay a price, and this is a court order. Now, this is new, the FBI has secretly been pressuring Americans to sign away their constitutional right to buy and own firearms? This is according to internal documents that the Daily Caller News Foundation got. The FBI was showing up to people’s homes with national instant criminal background checks and forcing people to sign away their second Amendment, saying “You know, list yourself as a danger to yourself or others and say that they don’t have the capacity to manage your lives, put your name down on this form and you’re never gonna be able to buy a gun again. Now this happened at least 15 times between 2016 and 2019. The FBI says they’re not doing this anymore. I don’t know if I believe them, do you?

5:48 There’s a certain irony to say to someone that you have to be mentally competent to sign this statement that says, “you’re not mentally competent to own a gun.” So, there is that. There might be a quandary if you get into a court of law how someone is mentally incompetent to own a gun could be competent to sign away their gun rights. But the whole problem we have right now is that there’s a burden upon the FBI to prove to the American public that they’re not partisan. This goes back to 2016 when they used a foreign intelligence warrant to go after Donald Trump and his campaign, a foreign intelligence warrant which should be used on foreigners and a secret court was used to go after a major presidential candidate. Now we have two weeks ago, or in the last week, an FBI agent has been let go because he was hiding evidence that Hunter Biden’s laptop was legitimate. So, I think there’s a burden on the FBI, whether it’s this, whether it’s guns, or anything else to prove to us that they’re not acting in a political way. And I’ve had this conversation with Christopher Wray before. He doesn’t seem to be troubled at all by using a foreign intelligence warrant on an American. That’s why he just doesn’t simply get it.

from 95% effective to 12% effective to “I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection"

It's not just that they lie but the aesthetics of how they lie that makes me sick.  It's like dramatic irony where the audience knows details about the drama yet the characters continue to pretend and to lie that what you know doesn't exist or is the source of fake news or some right-wing conspiracy when in truth its all out in the open. 

Just to confirm, who was it that were on the White House COVID-19 Task Force?  To government, narrative is everything.  Wikipedia certifies some of it:

Also referred to as the President's Coronavirus Task Force, it was established on January 29, 2020, with Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar as chair.  On February 26, 2020, U.S. vice president Mike Pence was named to chair the task force, and Deborah Birx was named the response coordinator. 

Odd there's no mention of Fauci.

Here is the full cast of characters, a list that does include Fauci, Redfield, Collins, Peter Marks who joined late on May 15, 2020. So Fauci and Birx were on the same team, presumably sharing the same data, reaching and preparing conclusions that they can deliver to the public.  

But what we have today is Debra Birx admitting that she, that "they" knew the vaccines wouldn't work.  Is she, as a member of the den of thieves, throwing Tony Fauci under the bus?  Medical journals told us of 95% vaccine effectiveness.

by the Lancet peer-review study on vaccine effectiveness.   

Moderna: 94.5% effective in vaccine efficiency.  Relative risk reduction, RRR put the Absolute Effectiveness at 12%.

Pfizer:  95% effective in vaccine efficiency.  Relative risk reduction, RRR put the Absolute effectiveness at 12%.

J & J: 68.7% effective in vaccine efficiency.  Relative risk reduction, RRR put the Absolute effectiveness at 0.8%.  No Serious Side Effects.  [Define serious.]  This means that 99% are just as effective with COVID. 

Lofty numbers . . . that soon tanked. 

Whoever did this deserves an award.
pic.twitter.com/cJFcgpB9Y3

— Rising serpent 🇺🇸 (@rising_serpent) October 17, 2021

So from 95% effective to 12% effective to Dr. Deborah Birx: “I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection. And I think we overplayed the vaccines, and it made people then worry that it’s not going to protect against severe disease and hospitalization. It will. But let’s be very clear: 50% of the people who died from the Omicron surge were older, vaccinated. So that’s why I’m saying even if you’re vaccinated and boosted, if you’re unvaccinated right now, the key is testing and Paxlovid. It’s effective. It’s a great antiviral. And really, that is what’s going to save your lives right now if you’re over 70, which if you look at the hospitalizations, hospitalizations are rising steadily with new admissions, particularly in those over 70.”

As a reporter, Neil Cavuto is done.  He was good when he was giving Ron Paul air time in 2012.  Since then, he's in the same club as Max Boot.  Why would Cavuto let the vaccine question off the hook by not indicting the Paxlovid and further prescriptions by a big pharma shill?  

Glad to see Dr. McCullough grow some teeth,

"Scarf Lady" committed scientific fraud and misled the president and the nation into unnecessary lock-downs and restrictions based on the false presumption that the virus spread among health people (asymptomatic spread) that was disproved by Cao et al Madewell et al. pic.twitter.com/Doeion4tu7

— Peter McCullough, MD MPH (@P_McCulloughMD) July 20, 2022

Birx is so deceitful and such a twisted tongue that even her lies are ashamed of each other.  

Here are her words,

Dr. Deborah Birx: “I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection.

Then why did you sign off on them?  

And I think we overplayed the vaccines, and it made people then worry that it’s not going to protect against severe disease and hospitalization. It will.

She lies in her defense.  Incredible.  The vaccines don't protect against hospitalization, severe disease, or death.

But let’s be very clear: 50% of the people who died from the Omicron surge were older, vaccinated.

Okay, does this point undermine your claim that the vaccines protect against hospitalization and severe disease?  Not to mention her cavalier dismissal of "older" people, you know, our parents and grandparents.  

So that’s why I’m saying even if you’re vaccinated and boosted, if you’re unvaccinated right now, the key is testing and Paxlovid. It’s effective. It’s a great antiviral.

So this is her defense?  Vaccines don't work against infection, but take Paxlovid, it's a great antiviral.  Government just loves to tell citizens what to do while admitting their own incompetence. 

And really, that is what’s going to save your lives right now if you’re over 70, which if you look at the hospitalizations, hospitalizations are rising steadily with new admissions, particularly in those over 70.”

It must be a case that these people lie so much that they've stopped listening to themselves.   

She says the vaccines protect against hospitalization, but then says 

hospitalizations are rising steadily with new admissions, particularly in those over 70.”

But take Paxlovid for this?  Let's give Cavuto the Mario Draghi treatment, vaffancullo, Neil for not seizing on her bullshit, her contradictory remarks, and allowing her off the hook.  Nice but of journalism there, Neil.

[Dr.] Rand Paul: Remove Fauci from Position of Authority

Fauci should be removed from any position of authority. https://t.co/e3KOdhD9BY

— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) June 26, 2021

Rand is excellent on this planned pandemic.  

The numbers of those being infected and those dying are going down.  There's no reason to be hysterical, force this on children and mandate it for school because children get almost no symptoms; they rarely die from it.  It's like one in a million.  To Dr. Fauci and other elitists, submission is more important than relying on science.  They're not obeying the science, they're obeying this mandate that everybody be part of the hive, that everybody is part of the collective and that we're not going to look at your healthcare individually.  

When the conversation turned to the topic of Afghan leader, Ashraf Ghani's visit to the U. S., Rand is even better when he says,

We can't be their founding fathers. 

Rand keeps getting better.  

"Dr. Anthony Fauci doesn't mind going on television . . . and lying directly into the camera"

Dr. Kary Mullis, the winner of the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry & the inventor of the PCR test said that the PCR test was NOT designed to "find a virus".

He also said that Dr. Anthony Fauci, "doesn't mind going on television... and lying directly into the camera."🔻 pic.twitter.com/kL6CXNsyeb

— Kanekoa (@KanekoaTheGreat) December 15, 2020

Thanks to Robert Wenzel's "The Inventor of the PCR Test on the Lying Fauci," @ TargetLiberty. 

Commenters to this thread point out that Mullis was talking about the HIV virus and not COVID as though that were some meaningful difference to point the severity of COVID over HIV.  In Chapter 5, "AIDS: The Virus Hunters Converge," of Peter H. Duesberg's book, Inventing the AIDS Virus, he points out that "Now came the big question: Which virus to blame?  Finding one would be the easy part; since AIDS patients were inherently full of infections, virus hunters would almost have too many choices."  Duesberg's conclusion was that AIDS is not the result of a specific virus but rather the destruction of different immune functions from lifestyle and diet.  For the cancers associated with AIDS, nitrite inhalants were cited as the primary culprit.  

Interestingly, the areas where absorbed concentrations of volatile nitrites would be expected to be highest--the skin surrounding the nose and in the nasal/pulmonary mucosa-are also reported to be the areas in which KS occurs in persons with AIDS. 

"Tony Fauci couldn't possibly have made his claim, that COVID-19 is 10 times more deadly than the flu, with any scientific basis."

Give this a full listen when you have a chance. 

Robert Wenzel has been posting terrific updates and sound, meaning logical, latest news on the COVID-19 and the government enflaming the concern.  Wenzel writes

The [above] interview of Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor of medicine at Stanford University, by Peter Robinson, is awesome.

They begin by discussing the problems with current testing that I have been highlighting here and the fact that Trump's adviser Tony Fauci couldn't possibly have made his claim, that COVID-19 is 10 times more deadly than the flu, with any scientific basis.

Be sure to watch at least the first 9 minutes.

It is also good to know that Bhattacharya is about to start properly designed general population serological tests, which he discusses later in the clip. 

Until then, load up on vitamin D.