[RG911Team] Controlled demolition expert Tom Sullivan has a lot to say about 9/11… and his explosives analysis confirms what survivors experienced at the World Trade Center. Here is part 1 of our interview with him… pic.twitter.com/tJGwOICTAI
[RG911Team] The most disturbing thing is that the government investigation into the collapse of these buildings did not even test for explosive residue. From the NIST agency website: pic.twitter.com/afwVCLOeoa
I encourage everybody to read a little more and learn a little more about the September 11, 2001 destruction of the Twin Towers in Manhattan, Building 7, and the destruction of our civil liberties through the PATRIOT Act. Richard Gage is the key guy for looking at the structure and engineering of the towers as well as expert analysis on their demolition.
Captain Richard Patterson, FDNY, ret., was himself an institution within the New York Fire Department. He was off-duty in uptown NYC on 9/11 but made his way down to the World Trade Center by hitching a ride in an ambulance.
He was carrying out duties just outside the North Tower when he was knocked back by explosions. He survived, but lost 41 firefighters that morning—brothers who he knew personally. He saw the jumpers from the towers, and he picked up body parts from the aftermath of the explosive destruction.
He is my guest today on RichardGage911: UNLEASHED!
Captain Patterson has a Bachelor of Arts in Fire Service Administration from John Jay College and 20 years as a firefighter.
As we explain below, the tilting of the South Tower on 9/11 was followed by some very unusual results that could not be caused by fire. What did this? pic.twitter.com/kTYphmZuAL
— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) June 11, 2024
[RG911Team] Can you handle the truth about 10/7 - and its link to 9/11?
The military stand-down… The Dancing Israelis… …and more?
We went down the rabbit hole to find the dark truth about Gaza, and we dare you to join us live on 5/21 at 8pm EST. See next post for link ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/AIayx6lHPz
— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) May 21, 2024
Astounding parallels between 9/11 and Gaza. We know that the powers that be in their false flag operations that they use to manipulate people create a problem. They amplify the reaction, manipulating the public, and then they offer their prescribed solutions: problem, reaction, solution. We'll be looking at the case study of Gaza and 9/11 beginning with
THE PROBLEM PRESCRIBED
PARALLEL #1 Previously established geostrategic goals coveting the natural resources of the target territory.
PARALLEL #2 A look at the rich history of historic and recent provocations and false flag operations.
PARALLEL #3 Politically useful controlled patsies are used.
PARALLEL #4 A triggering event with an innovative attack with dubious origins, a manufactured Invasion from foreign operatives.
PARALLEL #5 A catastrophic intelligence failure.
PARALLEL #6 A military stand down with an obvious uncharacteristic delay in response
PARALLEL #7 Foreknowledge of the attack because of course when these events are planned in advance there are people with knowledge for knowledge of them.
PARALLEL #8 Dancing Israelis during the attacks.
THE REACTION (the public gets manipulated)
PARALLEL #9 Propaganda with outrageous slogans from government and media to manipulate the public emotion, often using crisis actors.
PARALLEL #10 Atrocities alleged to the enemy with ensuing dehumanization of them.
PARALLEL #11 Denial of alleged atrocities by the enemy.
PARALLEL #12 Opposition media and journalists targeted.
PRESCRIBED SOLUTION (to their problem)
PARALLEL #13 Military revenge attack prepared in advance with no investigation.
PARALLEL #14 Occupy the territory of the new enemy. This is the land grab.
PARALLEL #15 Widening the conflict to achieve the original broader goals.
PARALLEL #16 Affecting regime change of the enemy leadership, an originally established goal.
PARALLEL #17 Enact the Forever War policy.
PARALLEL #18 Billions flowing to the media and the banking and the war Industries.
PARALLEL #19 Extreme public censorship by government, mainstream media, and social media.
PARALLEL #20 Draconian policies and surveillance instituted by government.
Then we take a deep look into the malevolent roots that are more than 250 years old.
[RG911Team] Researchers like @BenSwann_ have exposed the IDF stand down and tank attacks on its own citizens on 10/7… but why did they do it?
We explain why in our interview with The Muckrakers - another eerie parallel to 9/11. pic.twitter.com/ifg1NMVNJH
— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) July 27, 2024
This is concerning to all of us because it turns out that the Gaza attacks on October 7th, 2023 paralleled almost line for line the playbook used for 9/11. And I found 22 parallels and this is based on the excellent work of research and delivery of Kevin Ryan, originally who developed the parallels for Gaza but for COVID-19 also with 9/11. The first one that I spent some time diving into is that they established a goal for strategic interests in another country. They actually established these goals well ahead of these attacks so we actually know why the attacks are happening. For instance, in Gaza, many people don't know that there's an incredible set of natural gas discoveries, deposits, outside of Israel. But where? Outside of Gaza, immediately offshore of the Palestinian-controlled area. It's their gas, 1.2 trillion cubic feet, and oil, too, 71 million in oil and almost half a trillion in profits from these gas deposits but the Israelis and the Palestinians have been fighting over this. Nevertheless, Israel has already signed contracts with International firms to exploit those resources and even claim as the energy answer for Israel now becoming an exporter of natural gas. The UN has cited a report saying this is not your gas. This belongs to the Palestinian people, and they've been deprived of these profits which could not only make them energy independent again but exporters. So Israel does not want Hamas to have this money or access to this gas; they've been tying it up quite a bit. This is in parallel with their plan to develop the Ben Gurion Canal which would compete with the Suez Canal and this has been on the books for decades. decades. They would make this canal twice as wide and twice as deep, allowing for bi-directional shipping. 30% of the entire world's shipping goes through the Suez Canal. Well, it's very expensive and it's very time-consuming because they have to line up and they can only go one way at a time through the Suez Canal. And it's expensive because Egypt has to develop a dredge continuously the sand, and they have nationalized the canal away from the global developers and they have at times prevented Israel from even using it. This is a problem for Israel, so they've developed this other solution. And it's three times as long. It's a huge $55 billion project. The problem is they have to go around Gaza because Gaza is there. Well, that's going to require them to go through the sandy desert which they'll have the same problems as Egypt did. If they could go straight through Gaza, they could save a third of the length of the canal. They could save massive costs on and the maintenance cost of that dredging . . .
— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) March 27, 2024
[RG911Team] Let’s not forget the deceased Sen. Joe Lieberman co-authored a bill to place Americans in indefinite detention - without being charged with a crime.
This is what the 9/11 lies legitimized and why we continue to expose them every day. pic.twitter.com/bReGlYispo
— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) March 27, 2024
I see lots of memes that say, "Never Forget" laid over the image of the Twin Towers along with Building 7. But people have already forgotten, have already forgotten the details of the event. Do you know who was killed that day in that attack? Do you know who committed the attacks? Do you know the extent of the crimes? Do you know the extent of the cover-up? No on all accounts, and in this way you're already forgetting. Heck, the CIA loves to clever tags in the media for you to remember but to do nothing about it. 9/11. Easy to remember. Who can forget that? Lee Harvey Oswald? Again, that 3-named assassin, or patsy, who can for JFK or Lee Harvey Oswald, Jack Ruby, or Martin Luther King? Who can forget Sirhan, Sirhan? Clever little phrases, numbers, and slogans to remember for a lifetime. But what do you know about the details? If it's nothing, then you've already begun to forget.
[RG911Team] In the full clip, Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney also questions US military leaders on child sex abuse in defense contractors and the trillions of dollars unaccounted for at the Pentagon. Link:
MCKINNEY, Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Secretary, I watched President Bush deliver a moving speech at the United Nations in September 2003 in which he mentioned the crisis of the sex trade. The President called for the punishment of those involved in this horrible business, but at the very moment of that speech DynCorp was exposed for having been involved in the buying and selling of young women and children. While all of this was going on, DynCorp kept the Pentagon contract to administer the smallpox and Anthrax vaccines and is now working on a plague vaccine through the Joint Vaccine Acquisition position program. Mr. Secretary, is it the policy of the US government to reward companies that traffic in women and little girls? That's my first question. My second question is according to the Controller General of the United States there are serious financial management problems at the Pentagon to which Mr. Cooper alluded. Fiscal year, 1999, $2.3 trillion missing. Fiscal year, 2000, $1.1 trillion missing, and DOD is the number one reason why the government can't balance its checkbook? The Pentagon has claimed year after year that the reason it can't account for the money is because it's computers don't communicate with each other. My second question, Mr Secretary, is who has the contracts today to make those systems communicate with each other? How long have they had those contracts, and how much have the taxpayers paid for them? Finally Mr. Secretary, after the last hearing I thought that my office was promised a written response to my question regarding the war games on September 11th. I have not yet received that response, but would like for you to respond to the questions that I've put to you today and then I do expect the written response to my previous question hopefully by the end of the week.
RUMSFELD, 2:10. Thank you representative first the answer to your first question is no absolutely not the policy of the United States government is clear unambiguous and opposed to the activities that you described the second question, . . .
MCKINNEY, 2:32. Well how do you explain the fact that DynCorp and its successor companies have received and continue to receive government contracts?
RUMSFELD, 2:41. I would have to go and find the fax but there are laws and rules and regulations with respect to government contracts and there are times that corporations do things that they should not do in which case they tend to be suspended for some period there are times then that under the laws and rules and regulations, they're passed by the Congress and implemented by the executive branch that corporations can get off out of the Penalty Box if you will and be permitted to engage in contracts with the government they are generally not barred in perpetuity.
MCKINNEY, 3:19. This contract with this company was never in The Penalty Box. If you could proceed to my second question, please.
RUMSFELD, 3:27. The second question I forgot what the second question was thank you Miss McKinney I appreciate the question I appreciate your interest in the Department's Financial condition and we are working very hard on that program I've just come back recently.
MCKINNEY, 3:55. I understand you're working hard on it but my question was who has the contracts how long have they had that contract and how much money have we spent on it?
TINA JONES, 4:02. In general we spend about $20 billion in the department on Information Technology systems the accounting systems are part of that I can get you the exact number for the record of what we spend on our current what we call Legacy systems and those that we are moving toward
MCKINNEY, 4:21. And who has the contracts
JONES, 4:23. That would be a multitude of individuals
MCKINNEY, 4:25. Could you name some, please?
JONES, 4:26. Well I think off the top of my head I would rather not . . . I would rather provide that for the record.
MCKINNEY, 4:32.That's not privileged information, is it?
JONES, 4:34. I'm sure it's not.
MCKINNEY, 4:36. Please . . . We still have time, so, please . . . .
JONES, 4:39. I would be glad to provide for the record and I don't want to talk from the top of my head and be incorrect.
RUMSFELD, 4:44. On your first question I'm advised by Dr Chu that it was not the corporation that was engaged in the activities you characterized but I'm told it was an employee of the corporation and it was some years ago in the Balkans that that took place
MCKINNEY, 5:00. It's my understanding that it continues to take place
RUMSFELD, 5:01. Is that right?
MCKINNEY, 5:02. Yes . . .
RUMSFELD, 5:03. Well if you can give me information to that effect
MCKINNEY, 5:05. I am sure that you are interested in all of the information that I have and I will be more than happy to provide it to you but I would also like to get information from you for example the information that I just requested about who has those contracts
RUMSFELD, 5:35. We'll get back on both of the first two questions but the congresswoman has raised the other question twice now and I'd like to have General Myers respond because you mentioned it in the last hearing and I think it would be helpful to get the answer even though we are unread if you don't mind Mr chairman
MCKINNEY, 5:52. But I would like to have the answer in writing as well as I thought my office was promised.
MYERS, 6:00. Okay I don't know about the promise Congresswoman, but could you repeat the question to make sure I'm answering the right question this is a 9/11 question.
MCKINNEY, 6:06. The question was we had four war games going on on September 11th and the question that I tried to pose before the secretary had to go to lunch was whether or not the activities of the four war games going on on September 11th actually impaired our ability to respond to the attacks.
GENERAL RICHARD MYERS, 6:30. The answer to the question is no did not impair our response in fact General Eberhart who was in the commander of the North American Aerospace Defense command he testified in front of the 9/11 Commission I believe, I believe he told him that it enhanced our ability to respond given that Norad didn't have the overall responsibility for responding to the attacks that day that was an FAA responsibility but they were there were two cpx's there was one Department of Justice exercise it didn't have anything to do with the other three and there was an actual operation on going because there was some Russian bomber activity up near Alaska . . .
MCKINNEY, 7:08. So let me ask you this then. Who was in charge of managing those war games?
CHAIRMAN HUNTER, 7:15. Ah, General, why don't you give the best answer you can here in a short period of time and the Gentle Lady wants to get it written answer anyway and then we can move on to other folks.
GENERAL RICHARD MYERS, 7:26. The important thing to realize is that North American Aerospace defense command was responsible these are command post exercises what that means is all the battle positions that are normally not filled are indeed filled so it was an easy transition from an exercise into a real-world situation that it actually enhanced the response. So otherwise it would take somewhere between 30 minutes and a couple of hours to fill those positions in those battle spaces with the right staff officers.
MCKINNEY, 7:53. Mr chairman I'm begging your Indulgence was September 11th declared a national security special event day
MYERS, 8:00. I'd have to look back I do not know. You mean after the fact, or before?
MCKINNEY, 8:04. No. Because of the activities going on that had been scheduled at the United Nations that day.
MYERS, 8:10. I'd have to go back and check. I don't know.
[RG911Team] If we had a choice, we think Trump should have considered Lt. Col Tony Shaffer for Sec. of Defense. Not only does he have extensive counterterror experience, he has blown the whistle on the 9/11 cover-up.
00:00. Two of the hijackers were escorted by a guy named Anwar al-Awlaki. Anwar al-Awlaki, by the way for those paying attention, was assassinated in Yemen along with his son by Barack Obama in a hellfire strike in Yemen. So I said at the time that was not about . . . Anwar al-Awlaki was no existential threat. He was a priest who was on the run, and I think they killed him because he had direct knowledge about whatever we're talking about here. He was a US partner. No, I'm serious, Richard. This was an assassination of a US person. No doubt. Anwar al-Awlaki was assassinated by Barack Obama. I've said a number of times that they did not want that man alive because of what he knew. Anwar al-Awlaki became an asset of the FBI in the late 90s while he was a holy man in California. He was found with prostitutes. I don't know about holy men and prostitutes, not my job, but he got caught and the FBI made him a deal he couldn't refuse and he became an asset.
01:02. Now, the Deep State I think is that permanent bureaucracy, a Leviathan if you will, which basically will build itself up and focus on what benefits it, not the American people, not the Constitution, and it will ally with whatever political party, or entity within a political party, that will benefit them and allow them to continue that march forward. So I would argue the military industrial complex, the military industrial Congressional complex, that Eisenhower warned us of has continued to grow.
01:32 The 9/11 Commission, and I was told by one of the commissioners in person, face to face, and I'll quote, "Everybody on that commission was covering for somebody."
01:44. You called it fiction, the 911 Commission Report. Can you tell us why?
01:47. Because it was based on a narrative that was designed before the investigation even started.
01:54. The more that we can get out legally and put sunlight on this issue, the more chances there are for a new investigation.
— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) April 4, 2024
The fact that the building was brought down by explosives, which NIST, The National Institute of Standards and Technology, is essentially covering up, is the real danger to public safety and the truth about that needs to be known. --Mick Harrison, Attorney
01:25 The parallels between 9/11 and Gaza. Nanothermite on the WTC, Towers 1 and 2, and nanothermite used on buildings in Gaza. Note the demolition. It's turned buildings into ashes, not elongated structural steel or metal beams left in the rubble. Nanothermite turns things into ash.
03:15 In all three building collapses, NIST refused to test for . . . to physically test for explosives. This is just unbelievable. --Erik Lawyer, Firefighter
03:22 The total free-fall collapse of Building 7 just doesn't make sense to your seasoned, street firefighter. --Raul Angulo, Fire Captain Seattle, WA
03:33 This should have been the most protected, preserved, over-tested, and thorough investigation of a crime scene in world history. Sadly, it was not. What was it? Well, we know from their own admission, the majority of evidence was destroyed. Like Richard said, with 22 years of experience, I've seen a lot of crime scenes, I've never seen anything like this in my life. --Erik Lawyer, Firefighter
03:50343 firefighters, including three of my good friends--Thomas J. Hetzel, Bobby Evans, and Mike Keifer perished that day. And these were some of the best and bravest people in the world. And they, along with the rest of those who were murdered and died horrible deaths, deserve justice. Christopher Gioia, NY Firefighter and Commissioner
— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) April 8, 2024
6 out of the 10 commissioners, Kean and Hamilton, as well as Bob Carey Tim Roemer John Lehman and Max Cleland have all expressed concern that the commission was misled, stymied, hampered by conflicts of interest, and ultimately forced to participate in a politically motivated cover-up. In their book, Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 911 Commission and in press conferences and interviews at the time the report was released, Kean and Hamilton famously remarked that "the commission had been set up to fail."
Ten 9/11 Commissioners
Thomas H. Kean, Chair
Lee H. Hamilton, Vice Chair
Richard Ben-Veniste
Fred F. Fielding
Jamie S. Gorelick
Slade Gorton
Bob Kerry
John F. Lehman
Timothy J. Roemer
James R. Thompson
Max Cleland, 1942-2021, was originally appointed to serve on the 9/11 commission but resigned shortly after having been appointed to the board of directors of the export-import Bank of the United States before his resignation he said that the Bush Administration was stonewalling and blocking the committee's access to key documents and Witnesses.
00:42. Even Lee Hamilton the co-chair of the 9/11 commission itself admits to us that the process he headed up was seriously flawed.
So there are all kinds of reasons we thought we were set up to fail we got started late we had a very short time frame indeed we had to get it extended we did not have enough money they were afraid we were going to hang somebody.
Kean, 01:07. But it was very difficult. Lee and I write in our book that we think the Commission, in many ways, was set up to fail.
01:16. As it turns out, the majority of the commissioners felt that the Commission had been lied to, deliberately obstructed, undermined by the White House, or set up with staff that had conflicts of interest in the investigation. One of these concern commissioners Max Cleland resigned because the commission had been "deliberately compromised by the president of the United States."
Commissioner John Lehman meanwhile admitted on NBC Nightly News that the commission had to go through Karl Rove and other senior White House members to access key documents in their investigation and that "We purposely put together a staff that had in a way conflicts of interest," stressing lest there be any doubt that "All of the staff had to a certain extent some conflicts of interest."
9/11 PANEL SUSPECTED DECEPTION BY PENTAGON
Commission members even considered bringing criminal charges against Pentagon officials who had deliberately lied to them about the military's complete lack of response on that day.
[Huge debt of gratitude to Kevin Ryan at digwithin.net]
PARALLEL #1
1. When events are planned people know about it in advance, so there is foreknowledge.
9/11. Was there a set of drills prior to 9/11?
NORAD practiced 28 hijack exercise events within 2 years of 9/11 including interception of hijacked airliner meant to crash in a building in New York City. Particularly the weeks and months and even the morning of 9/11, 46 drills altogether. Operations, war games, and activities. We have terrorists loading Lear Jets with explosives, for instance, attacking Washington DC, in 1998. Hijacked aircraft hitting many targets, including the WTC at MASCAL from 1999 to 2000. And [Condoleezza Rice] told us, "Who would have ever imagined hijacking a plane and running it into a building?"
Pre-9/11 PREPARATION
DRILL
DATE
SCENARIO
NORAD
1991-2001
Foreign hijacked airliner crashing into famous U.S. building
White House, Richard Clarke
1998
Terrorists load Lear Jet with explosives attack Washington, DC
NORAD
1999-2001
Hijacked aircraft hit many targets, including WTC and MASCAL
Able Danger: DIA, SOCOM, LIWA
December 1999-2001
Manipulate Al Queda, data mining (patsy control)
Door Hop Galley, DIA
December 1999-2001
Still secret (Patsy Control)
Proactive Preemptive Operations Group P2OG
Unknown
Simulating reactions of terrorists (patsy control)
NORAD NEADS Exercises UN Headquarters, NYC
October 16, 2000
Terrorist crashes Federal Express plane into UN HQ, NYC
NORAD NEADS Exercises UN Headquarters, NYC
October 23, 2000
Terrorist crashes Federal Express plane with WMD into UN HQ, NYC
Pentagon MASCAL Exercise
October 24-28, 2000
Commercial aircraft hits Pentagon, MASCAL
FAA Drill
December 2000
Scenario: Chartered flight out of Ohio that had turned its transponder off
[RG911Team] Zoom into this hi-res photo from 9/11 and tell us what you see.
This image only makes sense if:
-The 110-story Twin Towers were made of toothpicks.
-Every structural connection was held together by duct tape.
-The NYC building code is so lax that a preschooler could get their design approved.
-The World Trade Center engineers were high on LSD when they constructed the buildings.
-Building developers are immune from liability for creating skyscrapers out of Jenga sets.
… or, explosives were used to completely demolish these steel-framed, fireproofed buildings from the top down.
[RG911Team] This mysterious 9/11 report isn’t from some Alex Jones broadcast or a documentary by Qanon supporters.
It’s from the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) in 2003.
Which of the true “conspiracy theories” they mentioned is most important to you and why? pic.twitter.com/PjDSsnMyCH
— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) March 30, 2024
A. When George W. Bush started his first oil company, who helped fund it, Osama bin Laden's brother and brother-in-law? True or False?
B. After a terrorist's bomb in a barracks in Saudi Arabia killed 19 Americans in 1996, who got the multi-million dollar contract to rebuild? The bin Ladens. True or False?
C. On the morning of September 11, 2001, who was in a meeting at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Washington? George Bush, Sr., and Osama bin Laden's brother? True or False?
1) The Bin Laden family had close business ties with the Bushes (CBC)
2) The CIA met with Osama Bin Laden 2 months before 9/11 (The Guardian)
3) The Bush admin shut down FBI investigations of the Bin Laden family’s terror ties (The Guardian)
