the explaining was done. A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented. The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping hidden. Have a listen and read their court filings. Dr Morgan Reynolds: No More Games.@BirkMountainman the explaining was done.
— 9/11 Revisited (@911Revisionist) July 16, 2025
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented.
The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping… pic.twitter.com/kZdshZSUKq
Dr. Judy Wood: drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-.
TRANSCRIPT
And being that there was an ongoing court case, I couldn't advertise, I couldn't talk about it. Yeah, the Court of Appeals said, "Yeah, the law applies to this case, but we are ignoring the law in order to dismiss the case. We went to the Supreme Court so that we can say we did it all. The Supreme Court doesn't have to hear the case, only if they feel like it. I first submitted the request for correction. That qualified me to file the Qui Tam case and then I was able to file the Qui Tam case. Okay, while that was cooking I started on the book.
00:32. NIST, like most governmental agencies, relies upon contractors to do certain of its work. Who should be a prime contractor for doing an investigation of the destruction of a building? Well, that's an easy well that's an easy answer. You go to the companies that specialize in psyops and in the development of directed energy weapons because that is who they use.
1:06. I have an important question to ask you. Is there a reason why AE 911 truth or the 911 Scholars and all these other Grand Pooba organizations, is there a reason why they haven't filed in the court system anything about nanothermite?
1:20. Well it comes down to the several things. Remember, I said that I filed a request for correction to NIST and became a whistleblower in doing that because I submitted my evidence to a government agency and right after that, about three and a half weeks after that, that's when AE 911 Truth website first one up, after I submitted that request for corrections to NIST and then they submitted theirs. But theirs didn't have anything about nanothermite in it. This is submission to government agency, and at the time they were whining that I was up and so forth. The evidence shows the reverse because if you, it's a felony to defraud the government, but you wonder, okay, what are all the reasons you can think of why they wouldn't have anything about thermite in their request for correction to NIST?
Why wouldn't they mention thermite or molten metal in their RFC?
They were basically saying you've got great data, you just need a little bit more of it. It was pretty benign. It was just a bunch of mumbo jumbo. So why wouldn't they have put thermite in there or molten metal, the two hallmark things that they talk about? I can only think of three reasons: 1) they really don't think it's important; 2) they know it's a crime to defraud the government; and 3) they know it's treason if done so by someone who works for another government agency because that's doing psyops on a government agency, that's attacking the government. Can you think of another reason?
3:10. As Dr. Judy Woods' research was being carried out, and quietly and carefully posted, various groups were forming online. One of those groups was Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, headed by an architect known as Richard Gage.
Suspiciously, rather than promote data such as a seismic traces or the energy effects, his group (as well as others, have attempted to steer people away from what happened and instead promoted the theory that thermite was used on the towers, a theory which the seismic data alone rules out from being possible.
Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez was a medical student when he joined this group in the United States after learning more about 9/11.
In the following interview, he describes his experience with them and exposes how keen they are in reality to marginalize evidence, which points to them being controlled opposition.
How is it that you came to begin questioning the 9/11 events?
The first real incident that I remember that led me to question 9/11 was becoming very concerned with the wars and repeatedly hearing on television that the wars were happening because of 9/11 and this was around 2008 getting towards the end of studying biology at the University of Iowa in undergraduate college. Our country was on this trajectory to cause all this harm and to drop all these bombs when there are so many people here at home that need our help and so many things can be improved so it's really just my concern for peace, wanting to promote peace and become very concerned and that's what led me to actually unfortunately I'm much wiser now thankfully but unfortunately at the time that led me to become a supporter of Barack Obama unfortunately back in 2008. I didn't think that all the things that he was saying we're going to turn out to be lies and false promises but at least at the time they sounded very good, they sounded like someone who wanted to promote peace, wanted to end these wars, wanted to close Guantanamo Bay. One of my wiser friends called me out at the time and said no I don't know he's a liar he's not going to change anything you need to look deeper into these topics and one of the topics he mentioned was actually 9/11 and she referred me to some websites that helped me to be exposed to some information that made me feel very confident in my understanding that we had been lied to that the 9/11 official story and 9/11 commission report was filled with lies I mean the accuracy the omitted testimony and I became very concerned that we had been lied to that we were going to war with these people these countries based on lies and that was very unsettling for me so I naturally started searching more of the truth within 911, starting with organizations like Alex Jones and Architects and engineer for 9/11 truth and that felt like to be the right solution for me was to support those organizations that appeared to be doing something about it and one of the places I shared it with I encountered this other PhD Professor a really smart person who was concerned and was listening to what I had to say and she went further and shared information with me and said you know what I'm going to explain what happened they don't even come close to explaining what happened and so you should check out all these other facts and not seen before. And she referred me to Dr. Judy Wood's website, a PhD professor and engineer, a very well qualified individual. What I found at her website just blew me away this collection of facts that were so well documented so well referenced and almost all of the sources provided things that just could not be ignored could not be dismissed that showed conclusively that bombs do not explain what happened in fact the only thing that really explains what happened is the fact that those buildings were turned to fine dust in mid-air and the only thing that really can do that, that is consistent with the evidence is a general type of weapon known as a directed energy weapon and it sounds very difficult to swallow when you hear that being said without first seeing the facts to see if perhaps any of this information was on their website and it was not. None of these very important facts were on the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth site or on Alex Jones's website. . . . As to why these people who claim to be searching for the truth why they were not sharing all of these truthful factual very important pieces of evidence and it just didn't seem right to me so I ended up messaging Richard Gage in an email asking him if he knew about these facts on Dr. Judy Wood's website and if he did know about them why they're not on his website rather than getting a reply back from him actually I got banned from his website
