Jihad is not just swords, guns, bombs, that's the smaller part of it, just like the communists. The bigger part of the total war is espionage, counterintelligence, propaganda, economic warfare, psychological operations, subverting key institutions, education, religious institutions, the media, the government, the political institutions, the security institutions . . . cultural. For them, one of the big cultural penetrations is the religion institutions. That's all part of their warfare for both movements. If it advances their movement, it's game. Nothing is out of bounds. --John Guandolo
So where are the hot spots across America right now, because one of them was Dallas, Plano, Texas . . .
00:06. Texas in general.
00:07. Texas in general?
00:09. I assess that and my team assesses Houston has the single worst city in America for the joint Islamic communist movement is Houston. But other really bad areas, especially for those Jihad but also the Communist support, the Dearborn, Michigan area, Twin Cities, Minnesota New York City parts of Los Angeles . . .
00:43. Patterson, New Jersey?
00:45. Yeah, so that area around Patterson is pretty bad. In the triangle area, like Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill. Nashville, Charlotte . . . Did I say Tampa? But even like Kansas City, Kansas. Wichita is pretty bad. Indianapolis or excuse me Plainfield, Indiana is the home to ISNA. So they have a base there Chicago I think I mentioned them earlier horrible and I don't just mean Chicago I mean pretty much draw a 35-mile radius around there. And the Jihadi Community is very thick and growing and they are raising a ton of money internally to a ton of money to expand what they're doing there.
01:44. What's a ton of money?
01:45. Like in a weekend, it's not unusual for them to raise several million dollars just to expand one thing they're working on.
01:52. Where's the money coming from?
01:53. From the Muslim Community, the US Muslim Community because you've got, you know, these people are engineers, doctors, they have money and they're putting it back into the Islamic movement.
02:04. And USAID.
02:05. Well yeah. I mean now that's just again another piece of it that we know about but I'll also say that they're getting grants from the US government I mean I remember one grant when I was in touch with some people in John Kelly's office when he was working for Mr. Trump and DHS . . .
02:23. . . . another traitor.
02:24. He stopped one grant to the Muslim Public Affairs Council, which is a Muslim Brotherhood group for over $500,000 that's just one grant, I mean that's a major Muslim Brotherhood entity. It's a major propaganda arm for them. But Phoenix is a huge hub for not only Brotherhood, for Al-Qaeda it has been that since the 1980s. My goodness, you could go around Denver.
02:55. But you're not just talking about Muslim populations . . .
02:57. No, I'm talking about the Jihadi networks in those areas. San Diego's pretty significant Seattle, Portland. Not much . . . there's a network in South Dakota but it's pretty small because they have very low . . . I've done some work up there, they have a very low tolerance for any of that. South Dakota may be the best state in the country. Poised, I would argue it's probably number one on m list for poised to kind of keep the whole communist Islamic movement out. And they're trying to get in there Montana and Wyoming are probably two and three but they have their problems Montana in the state legislature they've got some issues but those would be the best when people ask me what are the best states right now? Those are probably the best for kind of defending liberty. Now, Florida is doing a lot of good proactive work, but they have a very significant Jihadi network, and it's not just in one place. I mean, Tampa is a pretty strong Hamas hub but really around the whole state, they've got a lot of issues. Atlanta is very bad. I mean, Atlanta you can go back to the '80s when Al Qaeda was doing recruiting in Atlanta.
The British Empire never really ended it's still there but as a financial web we're at war with everybody the whole world other than Russia and China if you think it's just about the oil now you're in 2015 land.
This has to do with election fraud, drugs and the guns, and breaking up private money flows around the world, which keep the shadow empire which never ended, flush with cash. This is a classic divide and rule play that the British do. If they were flying Venezuelan flags, this would be an act of war.
00:48. One of the videos of the drug boats getting bombed and saying I voted for this extra judicial killing of fishermen off the coast of Venezuela.
00:57. Yeah, they don't know how to read. I'm just going to be blunt. People that are non-state actors in international waters have no rights under UNCLOS. If they're told to stop and they don't, then you can do whatever you want to them. The guy had a huge post on this the other day, and I'm like, "Oh, by the way, Senator Rand Paul, the operative word today is piracy." Piracy is still illegal on the open seas. And if you only want to describe weapons as guns, that's great, but cocaine is a weapon, fentanyl is a weapon. We're losing more people a year than we lost during all of Vietnam.
1:47. We need to declare war against these . . . these people aren't flying, they're not flying flags. If they were flying Venezuelan flags, this would be an act of war, and then Venezuela can declare war against us. And then we can see who wins: the American Navy or the Venezuelan Navy. Of course, Rand Paul doesn't want to address that because then that would blow his whole fake moral outrage out the window. Like all the Libertarians are crashing out over everything. It's pathetic. The more I watch them crash out and . . . I'm going to breathe fire for a couple of minutes on this because it's really been bothering me. But the more I watch them crash out over Venezuela, over the One Big Beautiful Bill [OBBB], the Epstein files, all of this anti-Trump crap, every goddamn bit of it is making me believe that the whole thing was a big goddamn British psyop from the beginning. In the first place, I can't not see it anymore. Jay Dyer has been screaming about this stuff for years and I used to like say I'll come on that's crazy the larouchans have been saying the same thing for years, "that's crazy talk." Now I'm watching them in real time. I had to hang my head in shame today when I saw Ron Paul say the Hegseth killings need to stop. Do I believe that Ron Paul wrote that tweet? No, I believe that faggot Daniel McAdams wrote that tweet. But, you know, "Ron, hey man, blink twice if you can't speak freely anymore." But that's where I am. I'm over this stuff. We're at war with everybody. I don't know where you lost me in the middle of that. We're at war with everybody. By everybody, I mean the West: Europe, City of London, the old Venetian Jewishness, whatever you want to call it, big organized crime syndicate that's existed for the last 2,000 years. Pick your poison as to how far back you want to go. We're at war with all of these people. We want our independence as a country for the first time in our 250 year history. And as far as I'm concerned, it's usually just watch who's screaming, and that's who you know who the enemy is. As far as I'm concerned Rand Paul is now the enemy he's made it abundantly clear he's the enemy of civilization. Sorry, sometimes you're going to have to take your principles and understand how the non-aggression principle actually works, which is when people are aggressing you and they're bringing crap into your community that you do not want, that is killing your people, you have every goddamn right to blow them out of the water. Non-state State flying a flag not flying flag dick up somebody's ass or whatever I don't give a s*** it's dumb and it's so pathetic to watch this happen so what I found really interesting what I find really interesting is for the first time ever I'm watching people "on our side" of the ledger meaning the conservatives or Trump or whatever you want to call it the sovereigntists or nationalists people let's call them the inheritors of Uncle Joe McCarthy are finally fighting back and using media in a way that they always use against us like I'm watching Trump not fight fair
Iranian here with another pro tip for anyone who's not from the Middle East.
When a Muslim country says Merry Christmas but a Christian country won't, you're watching civilizational suicide in real time. Here's an example of how upside down the West has actually become. The United Arab Emirates, a Muslim country that is governed by Islamic law, culture, and tradition openly wishes Christians a Merry Christmas. Even their government owned airline put out a Christmas message wishing everyone a Merry Christmas. Meanwhile, in France, a country whose entire civilization is built on Christianity, their airline wished everyone a "Happy Holiday Season." The UAE has no problem acknowledging Christmas because it knows exactly who it is and it doesn't feel threatened by Christianity. Meanwhile, Western countries seem to be so afraid of offending someone that they are literally erasing their identity, culture, and history in real time. No Muslim country is abolishing Ramadan in order to make Christians feel comfortable. So why are Western countries abolishing Christmas in order to make others feel comfortable? And once a civilization becomes uncomfortable with itself, it doesn't need to be conquered. It self-destructs. And now you know
Former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss has an dire warning about Democrats
“We're not dealing with a load of social Democrats who just want to raise taxes a bit and spend more on public spending. We're dealing with people who want to destroy Western civilization. This is what their… pic.twitter.com/d6ZJpphczu
Former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss has an dire warning about Democrats
“We're not dealing with a load of social Democrats who just want to raise taxes a bit and spend more on public spending. We're dealing with people who want to destroy Western civilization. This is what their aims are.”
“You just can't win. And this is what Donald Trump understands, perhaps uniquely in the Western world. I think there are others who have taken on the deep state. You might point to Victor Orban, you might point to Bukele or Melaye.
But really, Donald Trump to me is the playbook of how you need to behave because a lot of people in politics think Because it was the case in the 70s, 80s, that you could reason with the opposition, you could find a compromise, you could be bipartisan, you could persuade people, you could sell it in the media, you could roll the pitch, that that strategy can be adopted now.
And I think they're wrong because the opposition have changed.
We're not dealing with a load of social democrats who just want to raise taxes a bit and spend more on public spending. We're dealing with people who want to destroy Western civilization. This is what their aims are.”
Again, this is from the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.
Pat Buchanan laments the decline of the West and the collapse of European demographics, mocking the delusion that importing the Third World could sustain Western civilization. He calls it a “tragic illusion.” I call it an engineered demolition. pic.twitter.com/0Exgg5uk31
Because I think the West has disintegrated. It's the greatest civilization the world has ever produced, and I think it is dying. Take a look at what happened from the day, for example, that my father was born in 1905. Western Empires controlled the entire world with the addition of Japan and Asia, six or seven countries, America included, controlled the entire world. We went through two world wars that carried off something like 100 million people most of them Western peoples. And as a consequence, I think all these Western nations they all lost their Empires. Almost all has lost their armies and navies. They have lost their basic fundamental Christian faith, certainly Europe. The Pope says that it's "a desert of godlessness." And as they have lost that, their culture has begun to disintegrate and the people have begun to die. There's not a single Western nation whose native-born population has a birth rate that will enable it to stay in its present form through this century. Take a country like Italy. It's got a birth rate each new generation is 1/3 smaller than the last. Russia is going to lose 25 million people between now and 2050. It's already lost 10 million since Independence Day in 1990. Japan is going to lose 25 million people. You go down there . . . based on fertility records that go back when the Nations began to die basically the mid-1970s. So I think you're going to see the West and its peoples shrink as a percentage of world population. All of them, I think, will be predominantly, in terms of their population by the end of the century, folks, from the third world and from different cultures and civilizations. And the idea that they're going to preserve Western culture and civilization, I think, is really putting hope over experience.
The above clip is taken from this interview on Uncommon Knowledge by host, Peter Robinson, on February 29, 2012.
12:15. You've got multiple claims on metal, otherwise they'd be f*cking doing business and selling it at $82. They're shut down. Why do you think JP Morgan is moving to Singapore? Why do you think JP Morgan took metal off the market in COMEX? Why do you think all of this metal is coming from Latin America into the US? Why do you think? I'm going to get into that into much more detail with Eric who really tied a couple of pieces together that I missed.
12:45. Keep in mind, all of this is happening that we described while the Middle East readies a tokenized silver product. US has listed silver as critical. Russia has begun buying silver for its balance sheet. And Indians are now permitted not to sell their silver instead use it as collateral for money. Every nation on Earth is now protecting its critical minerals, and silver is the most undervalued asset on Earth. This is no bubble. This is silver exiting a crater and capital controls and rationing will stop it.
13:18. Finally, remember that in the US, 401ks will be eligible for metals in February, and China's restriction of all imports goes into effect in January.
13:28. So let's move on to the price action which is secondary to everything we've been talking about. Okay, so we're trading $4,530. Price doesn't matter. Nations have been printing money for the last 2 years to buy metal and the cat is getting out of the bag now. China does this . . . I don't want to give too much away what Eric and I are going to talk about, but this is the behavior of China in base metals coming to precious metals. And this is London closed for business. Tom Luongo is going to love that.
15:05. I'm telling you guys it's happening. For the last 30 years, the precious metal market has been forced to become a financial market and they've dissuaded people from owning metal. "You don't need it. Just short the dollar if you're bullish gold. You don't need the silver. You can use something else." And now Asia and the BRICS have said, "No. We want the metal because you guys aren't trustworthy on the dollars anymore. Gold doesn't care, and silver is right behind it in terms of counterparty risk. And guess what, the bullion banks in London and the LBMA for decades have been treating silver like a purely financial product when there is no silver to borrow anymore. It's over, okay. The world is split. I'm Vince. Have a good day.
Now, it's true that some people don't want what they've inherited. If they get a house they can't live in or maintain, people will sell it. Same with an RV or a beach house. Some people want nothing to do with this country. That's fine.
Looking back on a year of exposing the impact on American Labor by H1B.
Do you know that the US is the world's leader in beef production efficiency? It produces 18% of the world's beef with only 6% of the world's cattle. In fact, compared to other countries, it takes them 2 and a half or more beef cattle to produce the same amount of beef as one US beef animal. And the US produces over $27 billion pounds of beef a year and has the lowest emission intensity per pound of beef produced. There's your AG fact for the day.
Okay, so diseases are not a function of viruses or bacteria, but a function of the breakdown of a cell. Breakdown of a cell can be seen to be similar or identical in terms of symptoms, like Measles symptoms, for example. So what cells break down under measles? Or what cells break down under scarlet fever to produce those symptoms which are different from chicken pox, different from Gonorrhea, and so forth?
In our award-winning* series "Back to BS", we trace the roots of today's pseudoscience called virology all the way back to its source: John F Enders.
Fun fact: he was the only one in Enders-style virology who conducted a control experiment.
This is Trump rejecting the idea that unelected institutions should be allowed to suppress national growth to preserve theoretical stability.
He is choosing volatility over stagnation.
Momentum over control.
Power over process.
That path creates booms.
It also creates fractures. --SIGHTBRINGER
Translation: Screw London and the whole central bank model.
Libertarians should rejoice but they are too stupid to actually read anyone else's book but their own. https://t.co/ikOVQ3qnQv
What you are seeing is a direct assault on the post-Volcker monetary regime.
And it is intentional.
This is a signal.
Here is the structure underneath it.
1. Trump is openly breaking the Fed’s myth of neutrality
For forty years, the Fed’s real power has not been rates.
It has been legitimacy.
The belief that:
• monetary policy is technocratic
• markets are managed by experts
• politics stops at the Fed door
Trump is tearing that membrane.
By saying “anyone who disagrees with me will never be Fed Chair,” he is doing something far more disruptive than threatening independence.
He is declaring that the Fed is already political.
He is just willing to say it out loud.
Once that happens, the spell is broken.
2. He is reframing markets as a political instrument, not a natural force
Trump’s core claim is simple.
Markets are behaviorally managed systems.
They respond to incentives.
They respond to fear.
They respond to rate expectations.
When good economic data causes markets to sell off, it reveals something rotten in the system.
That rot is rate repression logic:
• growth triggers tightening
• success gets punished
• expansion is capped preemptively
Trump is rejecting that logic entirely.
He wants markets rewarded for strength.
He wants inflation managed after growth, not before it.
He wants risk-taking restored as a national objective.
This is a return to explicit growth primacy.
3. This is a regime shift toward fiscal dominance, openly stated
The old model was:
• Fed first
• Treasury adapts
• markets price policy restraint
The new model Trump is pushing is:
• growth first
• markets absorb volatility
• Fed follows the political mandate
That is fiscal dominance without euphemism.
Rates become a tool.
Markets become a scoreboard.
GDP becomes the legitimacy engine.
This is how emerging powers behave.
Trump is attempting it inside a reserve currency system.
That is explosive.
4. The real target is time, not inflation
Trump is obsessed with one thing he never names directly.
Time.
High rates stretch time.
They delay investment.
They freeze projects.
They slow capital velocity.
Trump wants to compress time.
He wants projects funded now.
Markets moving now.
GDP compounding now.
This aligns perfectly with the broader acceleration era:
• AI compresses development cycles
• capital rotates faster
• political patience collapses
• long-term credibility matters less than short-term momentum
In that world, a central bank designed for slow decades becomes a liability.
5. This increases tail risk across every asset class
If Trump succeeds, here is what follows:
• higher inflation tolerance
• higher equity volatility
• steeper yield curves
• weaker long-end bond credibility
• stronger real assets
• capital flight into things the Fed cannot print
Gold.
Bitcoin.
Equities with pricing power.
Anything tied to growth velocity.
The Fed becomes reactive.
Markets become political.
Risk becomes explicit.
No more adult supervision theater.
The real truth:
This is Trump rejecting the idea that unelected institutions should be allowed to suppress national growth to preserve theoretical stability.
He is choosing volatility over stagnation.
Momentum over control.
Power over process.
That path creates booms.
It also creates fractures.
But once a country decides that growth is a political mandate rather than a monetary byproduct, there is no going back.
The system changes character.
And everyone holding “safe” assets needs to understand what that actually means now.
🚨South Africa-style land grabs are coming to California. Newsom’s task force wants to redistribute farms from white owners to non-white farmers @ScottAdamsSays "How much do you think the efficiency of the farms is going to decrease if you take the experienced farmers and block… pic.twitter.com/XjS88eF6DL
"How much do you think the efficiency of the farms is going to decrease if you take the experienced farmers and block them from owning farms or decrease their impact on the farms... and move the farms to people who didn’t have as much experience.
What is going to happen to the price of food? It only goes one way. Nobody doubts how that’s going to turn out."
Preferred targets sit in the middle—large enough to matter, small enough to stay below the radar.
The Party does not want heroes. It wants conduits.
Sociology Over Ideology
This is not a political influencer program. It is a social penetration strategy, distributing influence quietly through everyday trust networks. --Desmond Shum
CCP social media strategy abroad: sociology without ideology, gentleness is a weapon, and more. Plus money. https://t.co/jtNlRU2rEE
Inside the Machine: A Rare Recording Reveals How the CCP Recruits Influencers
https://youtu.be/rV7JFmz6Ca0?si=F8UiPwok2rE8VKI-
A Chinese YouTuber with roughly 350,000 subscribers in the military-affairs space recently released a recording of a conversation with a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) recruiter.
The audio offers a rare, unfiltered look into how China’s overseas influence campaigns actually operate.
This is not the old model of “external propaganda”—no slogans, no red banners, no embassy tweets. What emerges instead is a market-driven influence operation built on a simple premise: credibility is scarce, and the Party is willing to pay for it.
1. WHO THE CCP RECRUITS AND WHY
The recruiter describes a system that resembles risk-managed talent acquisition more than political vetting. The goal is influence that is useful, controllable, and durable.
The Goldilocks Rule: Influence Without Exposure
The CCP’s first rule is blunt: avoid obvious targets.
High-profile dissident influencers—such as Wang Zhian (YouTube), Li Laoshi “Not Your Teacher” (X), Wen Zhao (YouTube), and Toronto Fanglian (YouTube)—are ruled out. Not because they criticize the CCP, but because they are already “tagged”:
•too visible
•too aggressively critical
•too politically exposed
•too difficult to manage
Preferred targets sit in the middle—large enough to matter, small enough to stay below the radar.
The Party does not want heroes. It wants conduits.
Sociology Over Ideology
The talent pool described is sociological rather than political:
•Italy-based music influencers
•Japan-based food YouTubers
•Philadelphia-based blue-collar and car-mechanic creators
This is not a political influencer program. It is a social penetration strategy, distributing influence quietly through everyday trust networks.
The Party does not need admiration.
It seeks to gently steer opinion.
2. METHODOLOGY: GENTLENESS AS A WEAPON
Invisible, Long-Term Discipline
The guiding principle is low-visibility persistence—“润物细无声” gentle rain moist everything, not sudden impact:
•no abrupt tonal shifts
•no one-off campaigns
•no visible coordination
The objective is endurance.
Limited Criticism, Strategic Assistance
•minor criticism of the Party is allowed
•policy complaints are acceptable
•one red line is absolute: no direct attacks on Xi Jinping
Controlled dissent builds credibility. Excess dissent disqualifies.
In the platform era, influence must be indistinguishable from independent commentary.
3. MONEY—AND THE UNSPOKEN INCENTIVE
The financial structure is explicit: €40,000 per month, with a 30 percent cut for the recruiter.
Money is only half the leverage.
The recruiter also hints at reduced harassment of family members inside China—being “on the list rather than outside it.” He insists this is not a threat. It simply describes the environment.
In such a system, cooperation functions like an insurance premium—paid quietly.
4. THE MODERN CCP INFLUENCE MODEL
One line captures the logic:
“The Party-state looks at the numbers.”
Not belief.
Not loyalty.
Metrics.
Views. Reach. Narratives that travel without fingerprints.
Traditional propaganda is abandoned because it is too obvious. The modern preference is for ambiguity, credible messengers, cultural entry points, and erosion rather than persuasion.
The goal is not conversion.
It is drift.
CONCLUSION
What makes this transcript unsettling is not its brazenness, but its restraint. The CCP is not trying to win arguments outright. It is content to let doubt accumulate and confidence erode, allowing “neutrality” to do the work slogans once failed to accomplish. Influence here is not about persuasion—it is about drift. And drift, over time, is far harder to see, let alone stop.
It's nothing new. @ArmstrongEcon and I have been saying this for years. Good for @PM_ViktorOrban to finally say it out loud as he pulls Hungary and the rest of Eastern Europe away from the brink. https://t.co/QEqT5Rg0FQ
00:00. Who has wanted war so far? Some European politicians have wanted war, thinking that a country with nuclear weapons can be defeated through a conventional war. Good luck with that. Also, those who manufacture weapons always want war or some kind of armed conflict. These are the arms manufacturers. And now a 3rd group has appeared: Now the bankers also want you to continue, because, otherwise, how will they get their money back? They can only recover their money if Russia is defeated militarily. That is how it all comes together. So I want to tell everyone not to trust that European politicians are sensible enough not to drag us into a war. They are not sensible enough for that. The only ones you can trust are the European people. You can trust the people in Szeged, in Hungary, in Slovakia, in Croatia, in Italy. We have to trust the people who will hold similar gatherings. Let's not be mistaken: so far, this is only happening in Hungary. In 6 months, there will also be large anti-war gatherings in Germany and in France. We have to trust that the people will enforce peace from the bottom up. This is the only thing we can trust.
1:17. The Democrats are on the wrong side. There's John Fetterman, the only honest Democrat. I can't believe we're sitting here having that conversation. John Fetterman, the guy who . . . look, I was not a fan. I thought he was compromised. He had the stroke. He couldn't speak right. He turns out to be the one guy you can count on from the Democrats to at least be honest. Now, he's a Democrat but he'll tell you the truth. He went into that classified intelligence briefing and came out, unlike other Democrats, and told the truth about what he had seen, why is legal . . . Oh, and by the way, right here, this in front of me, this is the Maritime Drug Laws Enforcement Act of 1986, authored by a member of Congress in 1986 from the state of New York. His name: Chuck Schumer. He wrote the law that passed almost unanimously that makes it legal to blow drug boats out of the water. It happened in the 80s a lot, 90s a lot. Go ahead, look it up, folks, Chuck Schumer, the author of this bill that made what we're doing with Venezuela drug boats fully legal. We don't need permission from the rest of the world. Chuck Schumer gave us that in 1986.
