What does it take for you to distrust a "trusted truth teller"?
— 9/11 Revisited (@911Revisionist) May 7, 2025
How much evidence do you need to accept, you've been bamboozled?
This interaction is from 2011... pic.twitter.com/D3u7uxxCfX
1:52. A quick summary is that the buildings didn't burn up, nor did they slam to the ground, but they turned into dust in mid air. How do I know that? Because if they had collapsed to the ground, you would have a pile of debris that would correspond to 2 110-story buildings. That didn't happen. Lower Manhattan would have been flooded due to a broken bathtub, the dike that holds out the Hudson River. Few people realize that the Towers in the Hudson River, the Bedrock is 70 ft below the water table, so there is this dike they call the bathtub or slurry wall that holds out the Hudson River. If you crash down two 500,000 ton buildings under the bathtub, it would have ruptured and flooded the subway tunnels, the pathway tunnels. That didn't happen. As a matter of fact, when they took down the remains of Building 6, they used a cable to pull it down because they were afraid to use explosives and this was a 6-story building there was just this little hump left. And the other way that I know that it wasn't the buildings turned to dust, it's just a simple way, is that if the buildings had collapsed to the ground, they'd make a thud, and the seismic signal that was recorded did not correspond to the size of the buildings. The seismic signal corresponded to a 16-story building or a 20-story building not 110-story building.
I don't understand the seismographic data. I haven't studied it. --Richard Gage, AE911 Truth
I've seen collapses in demolition buildings but nothing like . . . this was unbelievable. Like I said there wasn't a door, there wasn't anything to be found. It was all disintegrated, all rubble. Concrete was in small little pieces, not even slabs. No desks, no furniture, no computers, no phones, no anything. So I imagine that the people ended up the same as the buildings . . . disintegrated, nothing left.
4:07. Look at the cover of my book what it shows it's undeniable to anyone who looks at it the building is just frothing up into dust.
4:32. There's a whole lot of evidence of very weird things that happened at the World Trade Center. There are about 10,000 filing cabinets that are missing. They're about 20,000 floor trussles and 220 acres of metal decking that is missing. The question is where did it go?
Finding the Truth, Andrew Johnson. Free download.
4:55. We don't know much about weapons that we don't know much about right.
Wrong. We know the weapon used on 9/11 was able to do this.
6:06. There are no weapons in the public domain which can produce the effects we've just seen. This includes weapons like thermite, explosives, nukes, fires, hijacked planes, hammers, lasers, cannonballs, and welding torches. This means it must have been a weapon which is not in the public domain.
6:20. The observable evidence shows some kind of non-thermal and non kinetic energy being directed at the WTC to destroy it.
Therefore, the use of a Directed Energy Weapon is not a theory or speculation, it is the most scientifically accurate way of describing the observable evidence.
6:36. Why don't you mention any of these large sum of very important empirical evidence from 9/11 on your website or in the presentations?
6:45. Gage. We don't have the understanding of what else might be available given that it's not public information.
As you just saw what was physically done to the World Trade Center complex is public information.
7:08. So what we do at Architects and Engineering 9/11 2 is present in the limited time that we have . . .
AE911 finds the time to make a slick website, print glossy brochures, go on speaking tours, organize billboard campaigns and make documentaries.
But according to Richard Gage, they can't spare one hour to write out a complete list of the evidence for their presentations, brochures, and website.
A summary of the key evidence could be read out to an audience in about 5 minutes, and it could be handed to them on a sheet of paper to read when they get home.
7:35. The most sought-after scientific, forensic data that we can give you, that you can take to the American people, your friends, neighbors, colleagues, architects, engineers, government officials, media representatives and that they won't think that you are a kook. This is solid evidence that we present. Now I'm not going to present every piece of evidence out there that I can't explain.
[I'm not going to present the hundreds of pieces of evidence out there that conflict with the thermite/ explosive controlled demolition theory.]
No comments:
Post a Comment