KEVIN RYAN: 14 INCREDIBLE FACTS ABOUT 9/11

Thank you to Kevin Ryan at Dig Within.

It’s important to remind people that we still don’t know what happened on September 11, 2001. What is known about 9/11 is that there are many incredible facts that continue to be ignored by the government and the mainstream media. Here are fourteen.

1.  An outline of what was to become the 9/11 Commission Report was produced before the investigation began. The outline was kept secret from the Commission’s staff and appears to have determined the outcome of the investigation.

2.  The 9/11 Commission claimed sixty-three (63) times in its Report that it could find “no evidence” related to important aspects of the crimes.

3,  One person, Shayna Steinger, issued 12 visas to the alleged hijackers in Saudi Arabia. Steinger issued some of the visas without interviewing the applicants and fought with another employee at the embassy who tried to prevent her lax approach.

4.  Before 9/11, the nation’s leading counter-terrorism expert repeatedly notified his friends in the United Arab Emirates of top-secret U.S. plans to capture Osama bin Laden. These treasonous leaks prevented Bin Laden’s capture on at least two separate occasions.

5.  Former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was caught stealing documents from the National Archives that had been requested by the 9/11 Commission. The Commission had previously been denied access to the documents but the White House reluctantly agreed to turn them over just as Berger was trying to steal them.

6.  The official story of the failed air defenses on 9/11 was changed several times and, in the end, paradoxically exonerated the military by saying that the military had lied many times about its response. The man who was behind several of the changing accounts was a specialist in political warfare, i.e., propaganda.

7.   Military exercises being conducted on the day of 9/11 mimicked the attacks as they were occurring and obstructed the response. NORAD commander Ralph Eberhart sponsored those exercises, failed to do his job that day, and later lied to Congress about it (if the 9/11 Commission account is true).

8.  A third skyscraper collapsed late in the afternoon on 9/11. This was WTC 7, a 47-story building that the government’s final report says fell into its own footprint due to office fires. The building’s tenants included U.S. intelligence agencies and a company led in part by Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. Meetings were scheduled there to discuss terrorism and explosives on the morning of 9/11.

9.  News agencies, including BBC and CNN, announced the destruction of WTC 7 long before it happened. One BBC reporter announced the collapse while viewers could see the still-standing building right behind her in the video. Years later, after claiming that it had lost the tapes and then found them again, BBC’s answer to this astonishing report was that everything was just “confusing and chaotic” that day. Of course, one problem with this is that the news agencies predicted the exact building, of the many damaged in the area, that would collapse. Another big problem is that no one could have possibly predicted the collapse of WTC 7 given the unprecedented and unbelievable official account for how that happened.

10.  Construction of the new, 52-story WTC 7 was completed two years before the government knew what happened to the first WTC 7. In fact, when the new building was completed in 2006, the spokesman for the government investigation said, “We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.” The construction of the new building, without regard for how the first one was destroyed, indicates that building construction professionals in New York City did not believe it could ever happen again.

11.  Ultimately, building construction codes were not changed as a result of the root causes cited by the National Institute for Standards and Technology for destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings. This fact shows that the international building construction community does not believe that the WTC buildings were destroyed as stated in the official account.

12.  AMEC, the company that just finished rebuilding the exact spot where Flight 77 was said to hit, was put in charge of cleanup at the WTC and the Pentagon. The man who ran the company, Peter Janson, was a long-time business associate of Donald Rumsfeld.

13.  The response of the U.S. Secret Service to the 9/11 attacks suggests foreknowledge of the events in that the agency failed to protect the president from the obvious danger posed by terrorists.

14.  The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission notified the FBI of suspected 9/11 insider trading transactions. That evidence was ignored and the suspects were not even questioned by the FBI or the 9/11 Commission.

There are, of course, many more incredible facts about 9/11 that continue to be ignored by authorities and much of the media. Let’s hope that the next major terrorist attack results in legitimate reporting and unified calls for truth before fourteen years have passed.  

KEVIN RYAN: What Really Happened to U.S. Air Defenses on 9/11/2001?

Thank you to Lew Rockwell's "What Really Happened to U.S. Air Defenses on 9/11/2001?"  September 12, 2024.

17:50, RYAN.  Communications to NORAD went to General Montague Winfield. 

The entire military chain of command was missing on 9/11. 

General Montague Winfield, a general at the National Military Command Center, was missing. 

General Tom Canavan was missing. 

President George W. Bush was missing, attending an elementary school or preschool reading session.  The Secret Service was not protecting him.  He was there for 35 minutes after the attacks began.  It was highly publicized in there.  So he was taken out of the picture by just sitting there reading "My Pet Goat" to the children.  

The Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, 2001-2006, was the next line in the military chain of command, and he went missing as well.  He didn't know anything about what was going on, he said, until the Pentagon was attacked at which point he went out into the parking lot and tried to help with stretchers for more than 30 minutes and couldn't be contacted.  These are incredible stories but they're true.  

19:00  And the next person in the military chain of command was Hugh Shelton, 14th Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, 1997-2001, and he was out of the country, just gone to Europe mysteriously.  And then Winfield Montague and Canavan were out, everybody was out just for that morning, just for those hours.  So that's another reason why things didn't go very well, but . . . .  One of the more important reasons was that there were military exercises going on 9/11 that not only mimicked the event but they obstructed the response. 

19:40, RYAN.  So before 9/11 and a couple of years before 9/11, there were 28 hijack exercise scenarios that the military practiced.  And about 1/4 of those were suicide missions into high-value targets.  So people don't hear about this very often but if you research you'll find out that the information is there, that the military practiced this and they practiced this on 9/11.  There was an exercise called Vigilant Guardian 2001 that was practiced on 9/11 and had been going on for a couple of days when on September 9th, they had practiced the hijacking for a suicide attack against the United Nations Building in New York City just a few blocks from the World Trade Center.  That's 2 days before 9/11.  On September 11, they conducted similar hijacking events in which they were inserting simulated hijackings into the live air surveillance system, so they called it SIM Over Live.  The simulated injections were confusing the people who were supposedly responding, they all thought it was an exercise.  In their testimony with the 9/11 Commission, they say, "We thought the exercise had started early." The evidence shows that the simulated injections continued until after the attacks and definitely disrupted the response.  

21:13, MORRIS.  So you have all of these high-ranking members of the military, the chain of command, gone, missing; all of these folks at the FAA, missing, gone.  You have these simulated attacks being injected and being run on that particular day, 9/11, which seems like the perfect, you have what many believe, we on this show as well, with the experts that we've had on this show, what many believe that these aircraft were remote-controlled.  They were not piloted by these morons.  They couldn't pilot a Cessna.  They didn't know what they were doing . . . with precision guidance . . . absolutely not.  So these were remote-controlled aircraft being manipulated on that particular day and that's why we don't have jets scrambling to get close to the cockpit to confirm that these pilots are not actually piloting the plane.  It all seems, I mean you look at Occam's Razor, all of these things point to a massive, massive cover-up, no? 

22:05, RYAN.  It definitely does, and you can see the different ways that the 9/11 official account is false and they all look very much like it was a cover-up.  You may know that in the 9/11 Commission Report, they didn't even mention some of the major events that happened that day, like the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7.  Didn't even show up in the report.  The testimony of 9/11 hero, William Rodriguez.  Or the FBI whistleblower, Sibel Edmonds.  These are critical testimonies that never showed up in the report.  And this cover-up of the air defenses was really had to come down to just "Well, everybody was just lying.  They weren't tracking the planes."  I can say that 2 years after the 9/11 Commission Report came out, they justified this new account through an article in the magazine called Vanity Fair.  And you may remember something they called 9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes.  They suddenly found some tapes that somehow explained away that they didn't really know about it, and the communications failures were the big problem.  This reporter had gotten privileged access to these NORAD tapes that apparently NORAD didn't even know about.  That's amazing in itself.  So they tried to years later to justify it, but really they never came down to the explanation of why would all these people be lying in order to make themselves look bad?  So if you think about this, that's exactly what it is.  If they were never notified, they would have just said "We were never notified.  How can we have possibly intercepted the jets."  But that's not what they said.  They said, "Yes, we were notified with 20 minutes on Flight 175, 14 minutes on Flight 177, and 47 minutes on Flight 93."  And we were tracking these planes in detail; they give detailed testimony to this, and generals and colonels, people we just wouldn't expect to be lying for any reason, particularly for a reason that makes them look bad ultimately. 

24:27, MORRIS.  Also, I remember on that day news stations were reporting about the flight over Pennsylvania and tracking it in real-time.  It had gone missing.  Where was it?  It wasn't over Pennsylvania, so even news reports.  Even if you want to discount NORAD or being notified, even NBCNews, The Today Show, and others were reporting about this flight.  So they would have been fully aware of this. 

24:54, RYAN.  That's right.  Not only that but air-traffic controllers were taking notes.  So FOIA released documents that showed that air-traffick controllers were writing notes about having been, like Flight 93, having been hijacked and where it was going on the Ohio and Pennsylvania border long before it crashed.  So why would they all create these fictional accounts?  It makes no sense whatsoever.  It really . . . unless psychology you really need to believe the official account, which is the case for a lot of people.  I think psychologically, they really need to believe the official account, so whatever way they can do that they're willing to accept.  

25:48, MORRIS.  Yeah, I think there's a cognitive dissonance out there, they want the official story to be one particular way, the one shooter, and they don't want discussions about a conspiracy, which we now know verifiably is the case, whether it's the assassination attempt on President Trump or the 9/11 attacks.  So it's unbelievable to me that the American populous would sit back and say, "That's okay.  In this 9/11 Commission Report, you've left out critical testimony on purpose, FBI whistleblowers, and others about these pilots, all sorts of critical information, you've purposefully left out of the 9/11 Commission Report, or you purposefully didn't interview individuals or ask them critical questions.  That's all missing from the official 9/11 Report, and I remember the time when the 9/11 Report came out [July 22, 2004]

RICHARD GAGE: Israel does not want Hamas having this money or access to this gas this is in parallel with their plan to develop the Ben Gurion Canal , which would compete with the Suez Canal

[RG911Team] Researchers like @BenSwann_ have exposed the IDF stand down and tank attacks on its own citizens on 10/7… but why did they do it?

We explain why in our interview with The Muckrakers - another eerie parallel to 9/11. pic.twitter.com/ifg1NMVNJH

— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) July 27, 2024

This is concerning to all of us because it turns out that the Gaza attacks on October 7th, 2023 paralleled almost line for line the playbook used for 9/11. And I found 22 parallels and this is based on the excellent work of research and delivery of Kevin Ryan, originally who developed the parallels for Gaza but for COVID-19 also with 9/11.  The first one that I spent some time diving into is that they established a goal for strategic interests in another country.  They actually established these goals well ahead of these attacks so we actually know why the attacks are happening.  For instance, in Gaza, many people don't know that there's an incredible set of natural gas discoveries, deposits, outside of Israel.  But where? Outside of Gaza, immediately offshore of the Palestinian-controlled area. It's their gas, 1.2 trillion cubic feet, and oil, too, 71 million in oil and almost half a trillion in profits from these gas deposits but the Israelis and the Palestinians have been fighting over this.  Nevertheless, Israel has already signed contracts with International firms to exploit those resources and even claim as the energy answer for Israel now becoming an exporter of natural gas.  The UN has cited a report saying this is not your gas.  This belongs to the Palestinian people, and they've been deprived of these profits which could not only make them energy independent again but exporters.  So Israel does not want Hamas to have this money or access to this gas; they've been tying it up quite a bit. This is in parallel with their plan to develop the Ben Gurion Canal which would compete with the Suez Canal and this has been on the books for decades.  decades.  They would make this canal twice as wide and twice as deep, allowing for bi-directional shipping.  30% of the entire world's shipping goes through the Suez Canal.   Well, it's very expensive and it's very time-consuming because they have to line up and they can only go one way at a time through the Suez Canal.  And it's expensive because Egypt has to develop a dredge continuously the sand, and they have nationalized the canal away from the global developers and they have at times prevented Israel from even using it.  This is a problem for Israel, so they've developed this other solution.  And it's three times as long.  It's a huge $55 billion project.  The problem is they have to go around Gaza because Gaza is there.  Well, that's going to require them to go through the sandy desert which they'll have the same problems as Egypt did.  If they could go straight through Gaza, they could save a third of the length of the canal.  They could save massive costs on and the maintenance cost of that dredging . . . 

Check out the full interview here.