Showing posts with label Dr. Judy Wood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dr. Judy Wood. Show all posts

Sunday, July 20, 2025

DR. JUDY WOOD: Why wouldn't A&E for 9/11 Truth have put thermite in [their Request for Correction] or molten metal, the two hallmark things that they talk about? 2) they know it's a crime to defraud the government

the explaining was done. A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented. The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping hidden. Have a listen and read their court filings. Dr Morgan Reynolds: No More Games.

Dr. Judy Wood: drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-.   

Morgan Reynolds, Texas A&M Professor Emeritus of Economics, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor for President George W. Bush and former director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis.

Dr. Judy Wood the formerly a professor of Mechanical Engineering Clemson University, specialist in Material Science and Interferometry filed a case in 2007.

A nearly complete set of briefs and affidavits have been filed and U.S. District Court Southern District of New York, by the attorney for Dr. Judy Wood in the case and entitled Dr. Judy Wood ex rel USA vs. Applied Research Associates, Inc. et al.  1:07cv3314 (Hon. George B. Daniels, Judge).

In Wood v. ARA, evidence confirming that the annihilation and pulverization in approximately 10 seconds of each of the Twin Towers could not possibly have been caused by supposed jetliner impacts and kerosene (jet fuel is kerosene) is put forth in detail by Dr. Judy Wood, plaintiff-relator.

Reynolds v. SAIC (1:07cv4612) relies on evidence at 767 wide-body jet liners could not have done what video images depict such as attain the velocity of 540 mph at 1,000 ft or less above sea level or penetrate solid structural steel from nose to tail wing-tip to wing-tip without exploding without slowing, without degrading crumbling or losing a single part.

TRANSCRIPT

And being that there was an ongoing court case, I couldn't advertise, I couldn't talk about it.  Yeah, the Court of Appeals said, "Yeah, the law applies to this case, but we are ignoring the law in order to dismiss the case. We went to the Supreme Court so that we can say we did it all.  The Supreme Court doesn't have to hear the case, only if they feel like it.  I first submitted the request for correction.  That qualified me to file the Qui Tam case and then I was able to file the Qui Tam case. Okay, while that was cooking I started on the book.

00:32.  NIST, like most governmental agencies, relies upon contractors to do certain of its work.  Who should be a prime contractor for doing an investigation of the destruction of a building? Well, that's an easy well that's an easy answer.  You go to the companies that specialize in psyops and in the development of directed energy weapons because that is who they use.

1:06.  I have an important question to ask you.  Is there a reason why AE 911 truth or the 911 Scholars and all these other Grand Pooba organizations, is there a reason why they haven't filed in the court system anything about nanothermite?

1:20.  Well it comes down to the several things. Remember, I said that I filed a request for correction to NIST and became a whistleblower in doing that because I submitted my evidence to a government agency and right after that, about three and a half weeks after that, that's when AE 911 Truth website first one up, after I submitted that request for corrections to NIST and then they submitted theirs. But theirs didn't have anything about nanothermite in it.  This is submission to government agency, and at the time they were whining that I was up and so forth. The evidence shows the reverse because if you, it's a felony to defraud the government, but you wonder, okay, what are all the reasons you can think of why they wouldn't have anything about thermite in their request for correction to NIST?  

Why wouldn't they mention thermite or molten metal in their RFC?

They were basically saying you've got great data, you just need a little bit more of it.  It was pretty benign.  It was just a bunch of mumbo jumbo.  So why wouldn't they have put thermite in there or molten metal, the two hallmark things that they talk about?  I can only think of three reasons: 1) they really don't think it's important; 2) they know it's a crime to defraud the government; and 3) they know it's treason if done so by someone who works for another government agency because that's doing psyops on a government agency, that's attacking the government.  Can you think of another reason?

3:10.  As Dr. Judy Woods' research was being carried out, and quietly and carefully posted, various groups were forming online.  One of those groups was Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, headed by an architect known as Richard Gage.

Suspiciously, rather than promote data such as a seismic traces or the energy effects, his group (as well as others, have attempted to steer people away from what happened and instead promoted the theory that thermite was used on the towers, a theory which the seismic data alone rules out from being possible.

Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez was a medical student when he joined this group in the United States after learning more about 9/11.

In the following interview, he describes his experience with them and exposes how keen they are in reality to marginalize evidence, which points to them being controlled opposition.  

How is it that you came to begin questioning the 9/11 events?

The first real incident that I remember that led me to question 9/11 was becoming very concerned with the wars and repeatedly hearing on television that the wars were happening because of 9/11 and this was around 2008 when I was getting towards the end of studying biology at the University of Iowa in undergraduate college.  Our country was on this trajectory to cause all this harm and to drop all these bombs when there are so many people here at home that need our help and so many things can be improved.  So it's really just my concern for peace, and wanting to promote peace and become very concerned, and that's what led me to actually unfortunately I'm much wiser now thankfully, but unfortunately at the time that led me to become a supporter of Barack Obama unfortunately back in 2008.  I didn't think that all the things that he was saying we're going to turn out to be lies and false promises but at least at the time they sounded very good.  They sounded like someone who wanted to promote peace, wanted to end these wars, wanted to close Guantanamo Bay.  One of my wiser friends called me out at the time and said, "You know, he's a liar.  He's not going to change anything.  You need to look deeper into these topics, and one of the topics he mentioned was actually 9/11 and she referred me to some websites that helped me to be exposed to some information that made me feel very confident in my understanding that we had been lied to, that the 9/11 official story, known as the 9/11 Commission Report, was filled with lies.  I mean the accuracy, the omitted testimonies, and I became very concerned that we had been lied to and that we were going to war with these countries based on lies, and that was very unsettling for me.  So I naturally started searching more of the truth within 9E11, starting with organizations like Alex Jones and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and that felt like to be the right solution for me was to support those organizations that appeared to be doing something about it.  And one of the places I shared it with, I encountered this other PhD Professor, a really smart person, who was concerned and was listening to what I had to say and then she went further and shared some information with me and said, "You know what, I'm going to explain what happened.  They don't even come close to explaining what happened, and so you should check out all these other set of facts that you have not seen before." And she referred me to Dr. Judy Wood's website, a PhD professor and engineer, a very well qualified individual.  What I found at her website just blew me away.  There is this collection of facts that were so well documented so well referenced and almost all of the sources provided things that just could not be ignored could not be dismissed that showed conclusively that bombs do not explain what happened in fact the only thing that really explains what happened is the fact that those buildings were turned to fine dust in mid-air and the only thing that really can do that, that is consistent with the evidence is a general type of weapon known as a directed energy weapon and it sounds very difficult to swallow when you hear that being said without first seeing the facts to see if perhaps any of this information was on their website and it was not.  None of these very important facts were on the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth site or on Alex Jones's website.  . . . As to why these people who claim to be searching for the truth why they were not sharing all of these truthful factual very important pieces of evidence and it just didn't seem right to me so I ended up messaging Richard Gage in an email asking him if he knew about these facts on Dr. Judy Wood's website and if he did know about them why they're not on his website rather than getting a reply back from him actually I got banned from his website

Wednesday, July 16, 2025

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

THE SOLARI REPORT: The Implications of Dr. Judy Wood’s Work with David A. Hughes


Learn more about Elze van Hamelen @ her blog and at the Solari Report.  

And learn more about David Hughes.  

Sunday, May 25, 2025

"Do we want to think about scrambling aircraft, scrambling aircraft?"

Most whistleblowers prefer to keep a very low profile, especially if they have been attempts in their lives like some of the people I have interviewed this of course is quite understandable however certain whistleblowers don't mind stepping Center Stage so to speak and one such man a Former Intelligence Insider born in New Zealand now residing in Scotland has no qualms about going public his name is Dean Warwick. 

00:36.  I was drafted into the New Zealand Army.  I taught every course during my officers Training preparation for Vietnam.  I was taught how to bring down the Twin Towers using nothing but infra-sound.  We were made to study experiments by the Russians, the Americans, and the British in the late 50s.  It was in the mid-60s that I was in the military, but here were these joint maneuvers being undertaken in the late 50s by these three superpowers then in the Eastern block, bringing down 25 story buildings using nothing but sound waves, infrasound.

With Dr. Judy Wood.

2:09.  Well I guess the same theme as last time which was why are we still here why is 9/11 still seen as an unknown even though the truth is known and that's true with a lot of things and how it's managed is how most things are managed last time we start talking about the lens last time we started talking about the Lance Armstrong issue and there's a lot to be said about that and it wasn't that the truth wasn't known or knowable it's that it benefited a lot of people for the truth not to come out there are various folks that put themselves in the gatekeeper position and they make derogatory statements about me and I don't have air time but they do and so everything everyone hears is ray beams from outer space, laser beams in space, space aliens blowing up the towers, and it has nothing to do with what I talk about.  I'm talking about evidence.

3:05.  I think you had the book that the guy that was interviewing you, I can't remember his name, Howard Hughes, 2014, and you were saying that, "Can you show me any part where I said space aliens or anything like that or it's directed energy weapons?

No, I didn't even talk about weapons.  I was just talking about the mechanism of failure was it thermal energy was it kinetic energy or was it something else and you can look at the evidence and the evidence rules out you know first you have to figure out what happened and so you're looking at what happened and the evidence itself has already eliminated kinetic energy.  Kinetic energy is when something flies into something else and hits it you know a gravity collapse would be that boom boom boom the floors would hit each other you look at the seismic chart and that kind of rules out that kinetic energy also a bomb going on the kinetic energy there are chunks that go flying and hit other parts and then thermal energy would mean that the building was cooked to death lots of heat would be involved or you had people walking out of the stairway B and they don't remember being cooked to death and the unburned paper fluttering all about.

4:28.  And the vehicles I think are I remember you saying that there was a police vehicle and it was completely "toast" was the word that you used. 

Yeah, it was toast, it's history.

Toast apart from the plastic thing on the top which has got the lights the light bar on the top which you would have thought if there was heat there then that would have been the first thing to melt.

4:52.  Right, you put that on your grill, you know, it's going to melt.  So you look at things logically even down to that visit by the Pope a couple of years ago where he shuffles into the 9/11 Museum room and there is this Bible artifact that has metal fused to it.  It looks like the metal had been liquid and rolled down the page and resolidified.  It was molten metal but it doesn't mean it was hot; look at the pages they're not burned.

Look at the pages that aren't burned.

Look at the pages aren't burned. 

5:36. There are 7 buildings with the WTC prefix that were destroyed that day.  There were other buildings that were damaged that were destroyed there's that little Greek Orthodox Church if you want to count that one it would be eight.  But there are several others.  There is Bankers Trust and Friedman Hall

Wednesday, May 14, 2025

DR. JUDY WOOD ON HOW THE WTC TOWERS 1, 2, & 3 CAME DOWN ON 9/11

This is long but good, very good.  Dr. Judy Wood presents evidence of WTCs 1 and 2 being brought down not by jet fuel, not by nano thermite, but by free energy that disrupts the molecules in solid matter, destabilizes them, and turned the towers into dust.  That's why there was so little debris following their dusification.   

If you approach this presentation with intellectual humility, you will see through the government approved counter narrative, to the official government conspiracy theory of what happened on 9/11. Only true truth seekers, need apply their critical thinking skills. There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11 1. Problem solving skills 2. Group Think, peer pressure 3. They just can't handle the implications, terrified by the implications. Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no. The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence. The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence. The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves. Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence. The limitations are mental limitations, they are emotional and psychological limitations to what we allow ourselves to see.

Wednesday, May 7, 2025

1:52.  A quick summary is that the buildings didn't burn up, nor did they slam to the ground, but they turned into dust in mid air.  How do I know that?  Because if they had collapsed to the ground, you would have a pile of debris that would correspond to 2 110-story buildings.  That didn't happen.  Lower Manhattan would have been flooded due to a broken bathtub, the dike that holds out the Hudson River.  Few people realize that the Towers in the Hudson River, the Bedrock is 70 ft below the water table, so there is this dike they call the bathtub or slurry wall that holds out the Hudson River.  If you crash down two 500,000 ton buildings under the bathtub, it would have ruptured and flooded the subway tunnels, the pathway tunnels.  That didn't happen.  As a matter of fact, when they took down the remains of Building 6, they used a cable to pull it down because they were afraid to use explosives and this was a 6-story building there was just this little hump left.  And the other way that I know that it wasn't the buildings turned to dust, it's just a simple way, is that if the buildings had collapsed to the ground, they'd make a thud, and the seismic signal that was recorded did not correspond to the size of the buildings. The seismic signal corresponded to a 16-story building or a 20-story building not 110-story building.

I don't understand the seismographic data.  I haven't studied it.  --Richard Gage, AE911 Truth

I've seen collapses in demolition buildings but nothing like . . . this was unbelievable.  Like I said there wasn't a door, there wasn't anything to be found.  It was all disintegrated, all rubble.  Concrete was in small little pieces, not even slabs.  No desks, no furniture, no computers, no phones, no anything.  So I imagine that the people ended up the same as the buildings . . .  disintegrated, nothing left. 

4:07.  Look at the cover of my book what it shows it's undeniable to anyone who looks at it the building is just frothing up into dust.

4:32.  There's a whole lot of evidence of very weird things that happened at the World Trade Center.  There are about 10,000 filing cabinets that are missing. They're about 20,000 floor trussles and 220 acres of metal decking that is missing.  The question is where did it go?  

Dr. Judy Wood.  

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com.

Finding the Truth, Andrew Johnson.  Free download.

4:55.  We don't know much about weapons that we don't know much about right. 

Wrong.  We know the weapon used on 9/11 was able to do this.  

6:06.  There are no weapons in the public domain which can produce the effects we've just seen.  This includes weapons like thermite, explosives, nukes, fires, hijacked planes, hammers, lasers, cannonballs, and welding torches.  This means it must have been a weapon which is not in the public domain.  

6:20.  The observable evidence shows some kind of non-thermal and non kinetic energy being directed at the WTC to destroy it.

Therefore, the use of a Directed Energy Weapon is not a theory or speculation, it is the most scientifically accurate way of describing the observable evidence.  

6:36.  Why don't you mention any of these large sum of very important empirical evidence from 9/11 on your website or in the presentations?

6:45.  Gage.   We don't have the understanding of what else might be available given that it's not public information.

As you just saw what was physically done to the World Trade Center complex is public information.

7:08.  So what we do at Architects and Engineering 9/11 2 is present in the limited time that we have . . .

AE911 finds the time to make a slick website, print glossy brochures, go on speaking tours, organize billboard campaigns and make documentaries.

But according to Richard Gage, they can't spare one hour to write out a complete list of the evidence for their presentations, brochures, and website.

A summary of the key evidence could be read out to an audience in about 5 minutes, and it could be handed to them on a sheet of paper to read when they get home.

7:35.  The most sought-after scientific, forensic data that we can give you, that you can take to the American people, your friends, neighbors, colleagues, architects, engineers, government officials, media representatives and that they won't think that you are a kook.  This is solid evidence that we present.  Now I'm not going to present every piece of evidence out there that I can't explain. 

[I'm not going to present the hundreds of pieces of evidence out there that conflict with the thermite/ explosive controlled demolition theory.]