MARTIN ARMSTRONG: if Trump gets in, the Neocons are out. Victorian Nuland was thrown out of Trump's Administration. She has been in every Administration but Trump's

Gold has got nothing to do with inflation.  Gold goes up basically when you're questioning the future, who is going to survive?  Gold goes up generally when there is a collapse in confidence in government, and that typically centers around war.  --Martin Armstrong

 

Thank you to Lew Rockwell @ LRC.

14:30, HUNTER.  So let's say they get war, what happens to the economy? What happens to the bond market?  

14:38, ARMSTRONG.  Basically, we're looking at a 2-year decline in the stock market, interest rates going up, and you're looking at major crises in debt.  China owns 10% of our debt.  They would be absolutely brain-dead to hold on to any of it.  Because what happens in war?  You default on your enemy.  That's it.  Whatever they have, sorry, we're not paying anything.  Go on.  This is what they do.  

15:15, HUNTER.  Is this why gold is hitting one record high after another?  I mean it briefly went over $2,600 an ounce, and Goldman analysts are saying, nah, it's going to $3,000.  They're going to get this war.  I mean they're not going to stop, are they?  Are they afraid of default?  That's why gold is going up?  

15:35, ARMSTRONG.  Look at gold back going into 1980.  It went from $176 to only $400 in December 1979.  It from $400 to $875 in the last 6 weeks of 1979.  Why?  It had nothing to do with inflation.  Why?  That's when Russia invaded Afghanistan.  Gold has got nothing to do with inflation, that's nonsense.  The national debt went up for 19 years, and gold went down for 19 years.  That's just a one-dimensional analysis, "Oh, buy gold, because it's inflation."  No, it's not.  Gold goes up basically when you're questioning the future, who is going to survive?  Gold goes up generally when there is a collapse in confidence in government, and that typically centers around war.  That's the way things have been for centuries.  

from GoldSeek,

"That was basically caused by OPEC raising the price of oil dramatically and that created a cost-push inflation. So everybody's costs were rising dramatically. Anything that had to do with plastic, went up dramatically and that created eventually the inflationary boom between 1976 going into 1980. As for gold rose to $875, etc...I think gold was about a $100 in 1976 and it rose to about $400 but that was by December 1979, the last six weeks of the rally, which peaked in 1980 on January 21st. So from December to January 21st, that's when Russia invaded Afghanistan. So it was the geopolitical stuff that took gold from $400 to $875. So it's important to understand inflation is not the major driving power but inflation when war is around – that's what broke Bretton Woods...it was the Vietnam War."

16:45. Are they going to try to kill Trump again are they going to go for the third time as a charm are they going to do it again I'm not trying to be morbid I don't want him dead I don't want him dead but these people are cuckoo demonic are they going to try to kill him again?

17:02  I wouldn't put it past them. I mean maybe next time they use monkeypox or bird flu or something but Trump represents a real threat to their power.  If Trump gets in, the Neocons are out.  Who wrote that article for the Washington Post, "A Trump Dictatorship Is Increasingly Inevitable," Oh Trump Would Be a Dictator?  We Should Stop Pretending"? It was Victoria Nuland's husband, Robert Kagan.  Why?  Because Victorian Nuland was thrown out of Trump's Administration she has been in every Administration but Trump's pick up the rug and look at this stuff from the beginning of this year I was told that Biden will never be the candidate he was to remain on there to prevent anybody else from getting on the ticket including RFK why because this has been a setup I was told that he would stay until after the Republican convention why so the Republicans are confused and they don't know who they're running against then he steps down and hands it to Kamala this is the first time in history the Democrats have never had a right to vote for their own candidate why do they want to know why why do they want Kamala Harris because she's another Biden she says whatever she's told and will sign whatever they put in front of her nose.  That's why they want her I don't think they thought that she would do as bad in the approval rating the real one not the fake one the people that come to you for the real numbers so they come to you for the real numbers because when I put this number out Martin Armstrong says that it's 10, 10.5%.  My other source who backs it up says it's 8 and 1/2%. I don't get a single troll that says, "Oh, that's wrong because they don't want that to show up in search."  Not even alt media will pick it up.  Zero Hedge did pick it up last time, but that's a real number.

19:32. They can make them say whatever they want.

19:40. I'm not a fan of hers either but Hillary would have been better 

19:50. She's not going to be president and then do everything that they say, no. They don't want a strong president.

19:55. I hate to tell you this, but Biden would have lost, but Biden would have done better than Kamala. 

20:04. Maybe.  I mean she never even got one delegate in the primary before against Biden. They are afraid, they know she can't win, that's why the push for the shooters.  I mean how clumsy is this, another assassination?  They're pushing for shooting missiles into Russia. They know she can't win.

20:17. The second attempt at assassination is even more but this guy is not from Florida the question is how did he he got down there and suddenly suddenly gave him a gun and untraceable gun

CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS: Trump is promoting the digital ID and Biometrics to deal with the immigration problem

Trump is promoting the digital ID and Biometrics to deal with the immigration problem.  Do not let the Republicans trick you into a control grid.  Don't get tricked into "Cancel the Fed" and then end up with the BIS and the IMF.  Don't get tricked into Biometrics and a digital ID to deal with the immigration problem that the federal government created and can absolutely address without all the things because they're just tricking you into a control grid.  --Catherine Austin Fitts

"They have to replace [Biden]. They have no choice, they have to..."

"Trump is promoting the digital ID and biometrics to deal with the immigration problem—do not let the Republicans trick you into a control grid."

Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the… pic.twitter.com/rJ9hp4rCPP

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) June 16, 2024

00:58. And I'm going to be the bad guy now, you know, Trump is promoting the digital ID and Biometrics to deal with the immigration problem.  Do not let the Republicans trick you into a control grid.  Don't get tricked into "Cancel the Fed" and then end up with the BIS and the IMF.  Don't get tricked into Biometrics and a digital ID to deal with the immigration problem that the federal government created and can absolutely address without all the things because they're just tricking you into a control grid.  I hate to say it . . . if you look at who Trump put into the cabinet, you know, he put into the Cabinet a lot of people who were basically part of the Syndicate that's trying to build the control grid.  So before you get enthusiastic about the Republicans, you got to hold their feet to the fire that they better, they better reverse the control grid.  Demand that they reverse the control grid.  Demand it. 

Elze van Hamelen on Pharma Foods, all part of the story of controlling the food supply.  

It's an important story and it's one that I've been personally avoiding because I did a deep dive into the what was wrong with the industrial agriculture system and that was frightening enough.  This one is not going to be the most positive thing we've done.  So you read this and you think this can't ever possibly be economic.

Well that was my big question, I think, because it uses the same process as for biopharma products, but these are very high margin products . . . 

A hamburger is not a high margin product.

Even if you're able to set up this process and produce this product, which they're not really able to do yet on a high scale, why would you produce something with a margin of a hamburger?  

We talked about the universities, we talked about NASA, and the government agencies.  We've got a lot of startups and private companies and VCs.

What's important too is that after this VC Capital wave, the large corporations are investing in this too.

The conglomerates are here.

Because if you look at the structure of the food market basically every segment of the food market is dominated by an  oligopoly and sometimes there are also crossovers between these companies but our whole food system already is highly controlled, so to see these corporations are moving into this in a big way now they're calling in the government because in 2021 many governments have their own cellular meet program and you see the CEO of New Harvest she said well you have all the startups and they're not really getting off the ground they don't have an infrastructure we need an infrastructure now so they're lobbying all these governments a lot of government said have initiated this platform to help the startups get off the ground .

Why would a sane, intelligent person do this?  Why would Mr Global turn on the tap?  What are the logical reasons why this is a good idea?

That was actually a major turning point because I was reading this and I was like one thing is more insane than the other it's so insane it can be very frustrating but under what circumstances would this be rational?

Under what circumstances would you do it? 

Yes.  So there you get back to NASA like Solari published a lot about the space program and I thought okay . . . 

If you need food production on a spaceship, how you going to do it?  You can't bring cows, right?

DR. ELIZABETH EADS: "the combination of Fenbendozale, Ivermectin, and apricot seeds, i.e., B-17 cures cancers. Not all cancers"

Here is Dr. Elizabeth Eads, [5:00-6:00] who has learned from a series of studies out of Europe that the combination of Fenbendozale, Ivermectin, and apricot seeds, i.e., B-17, cures cancers. Not all cancers, she qualifies that point. But there are 63 papers confirming this fact.  She specifies that this combination treats breast cancers, prostate cancers, and colon cancers.  And I like the dig she makes on Obama, passing the bill to unleash government propaganda through HR 4310, the National Defense Authorization Act, signed by Obama on December 29, 2012.  So basically, Section 1078 of that Bill authorizes the use of propaganda inside the U.S.A. which had previously been banned since 1948 when the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, 1948, was passed.  What does this mean?  [8:00] It means they legalized propaganda, legalizing mainstream media, Big Pharma, hospitals, doctors, and publications to put out campaigns against Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, calling it "Horse Paste."  They weren't allowed to call it Ivermectin.  Who prevented people from calling Ivermectin?  Claiming that Hydroxychlorine was calling heart arrhythmias.  Chlorine Dioxide, they termed it "bleach."  Shout out to Pierre Kory, because the war on Ivermectin is beautifully laid out with all the evidence, and all the studies supporting this propaganda this study from Desort and Henin, The SAIVE Trial is a trial.  "Exposure to that Ivermectin reduced exposure to SARS-CoV-2 by 72%.  Not sure what that means exactly.  I'd be more interested to know what Ivermectin does to the spike proteins from the vaccine.  Hel-lo.  It is telling, however, that all of the Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine papers under the propaganda law were suppressed.  Then how did they get out then?   

12:00  Underlying cause of cancer falls into 3 categories: 1) EMF radiation, radiation, in general; 2) pesticides, glyphosate, benzine, and environmental toxins; 3) parasites.  All of this has been proven in the literature, so you have to attack all three of those causes/categories in order to treat cancer.  She includes the brand Root Spray and Clean Slate.  She also incorporates the blocking of all radiation radiation.and EMF and using products, topical products like Ozone Blocking, EMF-blocking scaler wave stickers.  They block EMF in your phone, your iPad, your cell tower, anything to block the EMF radiation that is bombarding us everyday.

13:35. Lee Merritt recently raised an interesting point going back to when they started to lay the electrical grid and wiryy for the TELEGRAPH. Everywhere where those wires were being laid down, usually along railroad tracks, there was an increased incidence of sickness in people living nearby.  Scientists have been tracking radiation exposure, and EMF exposure, all the way back to the telegraph.  Negative frequencies, whether in music or in warfare, we know that during World War I and World War II, they used negative musical frequency, called The Devil's Tone to injure and make the enemy hyper-aggressive and make them docile and actually surrender.  And then for each pandemic marching through the years, Dr. Lee Merritt lays out a correlation the increased amount of radiation exposure and disease.  So there's a great correlation.  You know, she's from the military, she has a Navy background.  She was an orthopedic spinal surgeon in the Navy and she sat on a lot of these military committees, so she has a lot of data.  But she has correlated the electromagnetic radiation frequency and disease in the human body whether that's acute sickness or illness or cancer she has correlated that and she's out there and she's really outspoken about the importance of Americans decreasing their exposure to EMF radiation and there are great papers on the frequency rate, papers supporting the 5G.  T there is evidence in Wuhan and Lombardi after they turned on those 5G towers is when most of those "Covid" cases occurred. So perhaps it was just a high amount of 5G exposure causing illness and sickness and toxicity in the body that killed a lot of those patients and not necessarily the bioweapon that was also distributed to people In Lombardi and Wuhan and New York City.

16:36. In your February interview you said something that some people thought was outrageous but you don't lie.  For example,  this explosion in cancers, you got the goods on to tell us there's also a video out by Dr. Bischoff. [Taking vitamin D3, Omega 3s, and exercise may reduce invasive cancers by 61% in adults 70 years old and up.] You can see him give his dissertation from cancer.org the Cancer Society Prevention Society.

17:00  At least a billion dead or disabled by Covid-19 bioweapon vaccine.  Are you sticking by that, or do you have more to back that up?

17:10  I am sticking by that.  Actually, it's going to be higher than that, 1.2 billion.  A paper recently came out submitted by Dave Hodges shows 600,000 Americans per year are dying from Covid shots.  And that data is supported by Stirling and Ed Dowd.  What they did is look at the actuary numbers in the insurance, life insurance numbers, because you know, because we don't have good data sets from the hospitals because they're not reporting vaccine injuries; they're not reporting vaccine status; they're not correlating the deaths with mRNA vaccines.  They're doing that on purpose.  

18:05  You're saying that the data they're getting of 600,000, that's just low because the hospital is shading that.  

18:16  I am sure it's slightly hire because we don't have the data set from the hospitals.  When we're talking about 600,000 excess deaths/year [Josh Stirling, an insurance analyst presents this number at the 6:49 mark] and we're not done with 2023 yet, that could potentially be 1.2 billion.  

18:34  A year?

18:35  Correct.  

18:40  That seems like a lot, right?  That's 1.2 billion globally.  There are 13 billion injections at least.  That's the number. These are the CDC numbers.  And there are at least 676 million injections alone.  676 million injections, CV19 bioweapon injections, in America alone.

19:05  So the UK has really good data set from their Dept. of Health and they have projected recently in a UK study that they've had 5, they're on their 5th or 6th booster.  They're projecting a population decrease by 2025 of 77%.  

20:35  Ed Dowd says that the number of injured is exponentially higher than those who are dying.  What do you think about the disabilities and deaths in the U.S. for 2023?  Ed Dowd said we lost 30% of our workforce in 2022.

20:54  It's going to be in the high millions. 600,000 and we're not done with 2023.  You double that and that's what, 1.2 million and that's underreported.  So millions.  Remember that the spike protein and the bioweapon nanotechnology remain in the body for we don't know how long.  There's no endpoint.  The reason you're getting these super cancers is because you have spike proteins being manufactured with no off button.  And so you have a delayed effect in auto-immune disorders and cancers.  What happens is that the spike protein dysregulates your T-cells, your B-cells which fight foreign bacteria, viruses, and cancers, and the complement system.  It interrupts that.  And then you have the SV40 that was discovered in the Moderna and Pfizer vials by Kevin McKernen who worked on the human genome project, who is a microbiologist.  So you have these foreign proteins with DNA, this monkey SV40 which he discovered in over the legal amount allowed to be as a contaminant in the vials, and multiple vials he looked at.  So you had these DNA proteins getting into the cells and introducing this monkey DNA, the SV40, which is also dysregulating your normal T-cells, normal B-cells, and complement which normally attack and eat cancer.  They're actually causing cancers.  And it's been suggested that these SV40 lead to cancers such as mesothelioma, lymphoma, and brain cancer.  And there's a direct correlation.  So there's no endpoint to the mRNA mechanism, the nanotechnology that has clearly been proven by the patents which are on Karen Kingston's substack.  And there's no turn-off switch for the spike protein.  The spike protein remains in the body for 1-3 years that we've seen so far. 

23:54  It doesn't dissipate?

23:55  No, that's my point.  

24:00  Is this why people are prescribing Ivermectin is it because it binds, this is what Dr. Pierre Kory told me, is it because it binds to the spike proteins and removes them?  Dr. Peter McCullough is also prescribing Nattokinase because it dissolves the spike protein.  Bind, remove, dissolves, sound like a pretty good one-two punch.  Are those two great things to have if you're going to preemptively attack spike proteins if you've been vaxx'd or if you're being shed on?

24:40  Absolutely.  Look, Nattokinase has been used as a food supplement in Japan for years.  And the life expectancy in Japan is really long, it's over 100 years old.  Nattokinase boosts the immune system.  It makes the red blood cells in your blood, whether it's venous or arterial, it doesn't matter.  It makes them less sticky, and it decreases the incidents of blood clots.  But also it's been shown by Peter McCullough and his team, to sweep out the spike protein, so I highly recommend the use of Nattokinase, Ivermectin, and some kind of chelation.  I love the Root Spray and Clean Slate.  Ivermectin has been proven to decrease the effects of spike protein.  Decrease the effects of and limit viral exposure and the entrance of the virus into cells and block the mechanism of the virus sticking to the ACE2 Receptors and the spike protein sticking to the ACE2 receptors, which are all over all the organs in the body.  So I use a combination of products.  I also use dimethylglycine or methylene Blue to turn off the mRNA.  It demethylates the mRNA that is outside the cell.  There's no product that we know that stops the mRNA mechanism inside the cell at this point.  But I use that whole combination to lessen the effect of the spike protein.  

26:55  No treatment that we know of for the q dot nanoparticles that Karen Kingston describes.  

27:05  That's not shed on you, that's actually injected into the 200 plus million Americans . . . that is not a shedding issue.  That's an issue of injection, correct?

27:17  No.  Actually, the nanoparticles can be shed during transmission as well and they can jump from person to person.  And that's been seen in the DoD literature and supported by James Giordano, who is Advisor to U.S. Military Intelligence community.  In fact, he wrote that "neurotism technologies and neurotechnology nanoparticles, such as NeuroLink, Neurolace should not be considered for their mass destruction effects."

27:57  What would Elon Musk say about that? It's a bio weapon, right? These are all bio weapons, right?

28:05. These are definitely bioweapons.  If you go to Karen Kingston's substack, she has put out . . . she has done some great work in Florida.  She has put out 12 Points.  She set up a document that has laid out 12 talking points to send to your County Commissioner to get rid of these mRNA shots.  And in Point #12, I am going to read it, it says biological weapons are weapons of mass destruction.  Allowing their use on civilian populations is a 1st-degree felony in the state of Florida.  And she goes on to say that mRNA vaccines contain neurotechnology that is patented for use as a bioweapon.  She has the receipts on her website.  And this document can be downloaded off of her substack and used for any county in any state.  This is specific to Florida, but she has a letter on there where you can plug in your County Commissioner's name and office.  In the letter, you can tailor that letter to your own county commissioner in any state.  I actually sent it to my county commissioner here in Florida.  

29:40  Are they going to do anything about it? 

29:42  Yes, Collier County has passed legislation that protects its citizens against mandates, and these mRNA vaccines.  It also talks about informed consent and there are other counties in Florida that are going to pass legislation against these mRNA technologies., mandates, and against the lack of informed consent.  It's a beautifully written document and everybody should download that.

30:25  Karen Kingston was on the cutting edge of this from the very beginning.  

If you want to get Ivermectin without a prescription,

there are places in the United States.  See here.  If you order from outside the U.S., say, from India, it will take at least 1 full month before you receive it in your mail.  

$70 for 90 Count.  Well, it was $70.  Today, Sunday, May 19, 2024, it's $90 for 90-count.  

FenLAB Phenbendazol 220 | mg | >99% | 90 | ct https://t.co/eg4yYaGn12 via @amazon

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) May 20, 2024

Crime that pays is the crime that stays

Hunter opens up with a Christmas greeting and then tries to console himself over the loss of his friend, CNN and ABC investigative reporter, Drew Griffin, who was a staple here on LA's ABC Eye Witness News on Channel 7 for years.  

Fitts has said that with so many people dying that there will be a glut of things in the market form people's deaths that it will have a deflationary effect on the economy.  People are going to see what's been done to them.  Are you seeing this unfolding now? 

Fitts references the Skidmore Survey from January 2022.  The survey showed that not only were there a significant number of adverse events--deaths and injuries--but there was a significant number of people who understood that it was coming from the injections.  The media has done a remarkably good job at painting a different picture, but at some point you can't defy reality.  So that's coming out and we're seeing it translate into market action.  So in one day we see the insurance companies trading down 30% and funerals trading up 20%, that's a 50% divergence.  So integrating into people lives and their health and in market reaction, it's hard to deny reality. The Doctors 4 COVID Ethics did their 5th symposium on December 19.  Sasha Latypova's "Intent to Do Harm" makes the compelling case that this was not a vaccine, not a pharmaceutical, not a medicine. She said it's a weapon.  The variability in the batches is far too great for it to be classified or described as a medicine or  pharmaceutical.  Of course, if you look at the damage it's caused you can only therefore describe as a weapon.  And she's very experienced.  I mean this is a pharmaceutical executive, somebody coming from the industry, and really knows the ins and outs, the definitions, and legal definitions, regulations, etc.  We're now staring down the barrel of a mass atrocity.  This is a mass atrocity.  This is a depopulation.  This is a genocide.  We're still struggling to find words to describe this.  If you look at the economic restrictions that introduced this it probably killed more people than the injections.  The deaths and injuries are more significant than popularly understood.

5:35. Hunter raises the question of finances. They're running our of money  They can't pay social security.  They can't pay the pensions.  Is this the motivation behind it? 

Something this big has more than one goal, multiple functions, called stacking functions  One, they do want to reset the financial system because we gave had a financial coup d'eta ss to knowledge, and to dramatically increase their political and economic power. But there's something else.  If you look at the central banking warfare model that's run the west for centuries now, if you're the central bankers you cannot maintain control unless you use digital technology to go to complete control.  So digital technology gives the planet the ability for the general population to dramatically increase their learning speed, to dramatically increase their political and economic power unless the central bankers use it for central control.  So you're staring down a situation that is a prisoner's dilemma: you either assert complete control or you lose control.  And I think the central bankers have decided, and the question is why, for a variety of reasons, they're going to assert central control.  They have 10 to 20 years to do it and that's what they're moving to do.  They want to chip people like livestock, mind control them like live stock, and have complete control.  They don't want to brook any opposition.  And so they're implementing a control system.  It's no longer going to be a financial system.  It's going to be a straight out transaction control system.  And they're saying no freedom of transaction, no freedom of health choices, no freedom of anything.  We want complete control, and unfortunately it looks like that is coming with a form of slavery that is far worse, in my opinion, than historical forms of slavery because it's so physically invasive.  But, now, we're talking about significant depopulation. 

8:10. HUNTER.  Why do they think they can get away with this? 

8:13.  FITTS. One theory:  one scientist who I know and who I have great respect for believes that a lot of what's happened in the last 3 years was to sufficiently terrorize the population to go along with being injected, chipped, and controlled.  Terrorization as a form of marketing the control they want.  Part of this is to put people in fear.  Most important for 2023 is to get out of fear and stay out of fear.  That means being careful not to ingest a lit if TV and not ingesting a lit if mind-control technology.  The reason they think they can get away with it, Greg, is because they've gotten away with ir so far.  I've always said that the crime that pays is the crime that stays. And what we've watched since 1998 is an influential coup and that they've gotten away with it, and the more they get people to ingest massive amounts of propaganda, subliminal programming, all the mind-control tricks.  Now they know that can't last forever, which is why they're talking about putting a chip in you or a neural link in your head all these crazy things.  That's to assert complete control even when you disagree with them.  They can shut down your disagreement. 

Find extended notes here.

You don't have any more time to worry about Trump or Biden. 

US Government in Full Scale Implosion Because of Corruption – Catherine Austin Fitts "That machine, to keep balancing the books, is implementing a depopulation plan. That is the reality that has to be faced and changing the President won’t matter." https://t.co/pxoT0G51LU

— Greg Hunter (@USAWatchdog) December 21, 2022

Hunter opens up with a Christmas greeting and then tries to console himself over the loss of his friend, CNN and ABC investigative reporter, Drew Griffin, who was a staple here on LA's ABC Eye Witness News on Channel 7 for years.  

Fitts has said that with so many people dying that there will be a glut of things in the market form people's deaths that it will have a deflationary effect on the economy.  People are going to see what's been done to them.  Are you seeing this unfolding now? 

Fitts references the Skidmore Survey from January 2022.  The survey showed that not only were there a significant number of adverse events--deaths and injuries--but there was a significant number of people who understood that it was coming from the injections.  The media has done a remarkably good job at painting a different picture, but at some point you can't defy reality.  So that's coming out and we're seeing it translate into market action.  So in one day we see the insurance companies trading down 30% and funerals trading up 20%, that's a 50% divergence.  So integrating into people lives and their health and in market reaction, it's hard to deny reality. The Doctors 4 COVID Ethics did their 5th symposium on December 19.  Sasha Latypova's "Intent to Do Harm" makes the compelling case that this was not a vaccine, not a pharmaceutical, not a medicine. She said it's a weapon.  The variability in the batches is far too great for it to be classified or described as a medicine or  pharmaceutical.  Of course, if you look at the damage it's caused you can only therefore describe as a weapon.  And she's very experienced.  I mean this is a pharmaceutical executive, somebody coming from the industry, and really knows the ins and outs, the definitions, and legal definitions, regulations, etc.  We're now staring down the barrel of a mass atrocity.  This is a mass atrocity.  This is a depopulation.  This is a genocide.  We're still struggling to find words to describe this.  If you look at the economic restrictions that introduced this it probably killed more people than the injections.  The deaths and injuries are more significant than popularly understood.

5:35. Hunter raises the question of finances. They're running our of money  They can't pay social security.  They can't pay the pensions.  Is this the motivation behind it? 

Something this big has more than one goal, multiple functions, called stacking functions  One, they do want to reset the financial system because we gave had a financial coup d'access to knowledge, and to dramatically increase their politicaltat. But there's something else.  If you look at the central banking warfare model that's run the west for centuries now, if you're the central bankers you cannot maintain control unless you use digital technology to go to complete control.  So digital technology gives the planet the ability for the general population to dramatically increase their learning speed, to dramatically increase their political and economic power unless the central bankers use it for central control.  So you're staring down a situation that is a prisoner's dilemma: you either assert complete control or you lose control.  And I think the central bankers have decided, and the question is why, for a variety of reasons, they're going to assert central control.  Thet have 10 to 20 years to do it and that's what they're moving to do.  They want to chip people like livestock, mind control them like live stock, and have complete control.  Thet don't want to brook any opposition.  And so they're implementing a control system.  It's no longer going to be a financial system.  It's going to be a straight out transaction control system.  And they're saying no freedom of transaction, no freedom of health choices, no freedom of anything.  We want complete control, and unfortunately it looks like that is coming with a form of slavery that is far worse, in my opinion, than historical forms of slavery because it's so physically invasive.  But, now, we're talking about significant depopulation. 

8:10. HUNTER.  Why do they think they can get away with this? 

8:13.  FITTS. One theory:  one scientist who I know and who I have great respect for believes that a lot of what's happened in the last 3 years was to sufficiently terrorize the population to go along with being injected, chipped, and controlled.  Terrorization as a form of marketing the control they want.  Part of this is to put people in fear.  Most important for 2023 is to get out of fear and stay out of fear.  That means being careful not to ingest a lit if TV and not ingesting a lit if mind-control technology.  The reason they think they can get away with it, Greg, is because they've gotten away with ir so far.  I've always said that the crime that pays is the crime that stays. And what we've watched since 1998 is an influential coup and that they've gotten away with it, and the more they get people to ingest massive amounts of propaganda, subliminal programming, all the mind-control tricks.  Now they know that can't last forever, which is why they're talking about putting a chip in you or a neural link in your head all these crazy things.  That's to assert complete control even when you disagree with them.  They can shut down your disagreement. 

Trump put $10 billion dollars into a program Operation Warp Speed to depopulate Americans.  

It takes 10-12 tears to test out a vaccine to make sure it's safe.  

If there was one person in political life who knew how dangerous vaccines are it was Donald Trump. This was a big issue during the campaign expressing his concerns about the vaccines, so he knows.

Trump put Moncef Slaoui in charge of Operation Warp Speed, who was head of research at a pharmaceutical company, GSK, and his expertise was on brain-machine interface.  

I will give Trump credit:  he pulled us out of the W.H.O. and the Paris Climate Accord

Current most dangerous thing is the new treaty from the W.H.O.  They're saying that a 2/3rds vote of the Senate is not required because it's not a change in treaty.  But it is.  It's a new treaty.  Find a template letter at Solari that you can send to your representatives and say you get us out of the W.H.O. and you stop funding the W.H.O. or we're going to be completely stripped of our national sovereignty.  If you go into the W.H.O., you're turning the U.S. into a country who is going to kill you.  

13:00. GREG HUNTER. Is there anyway for Trump to redeem himself?  

13:30, FITTS. I don't know.  If I were in Trump's shoes, I'd say "I made a mistake.  I'm sorry.  And here's what we need to do next year.  But I don't know how you come back from this. L

HUNTER. Karen Kingston was on his True Social, and she got banned, talking about how SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon.  It is.  

14:10. FITTS. You can say Trump was on board for a depopulation or Trump got rolled.  Either one is not a case to be made that he ought to be president.  Then he's incompetent.  You've got to hold people accountable.  You've got to tell the truth and you've got to hold people accountable.  That's the only way out of this.  

15:40. FITTS. Every quarter while Trump was president, we did a report card on Trump. It varied.  Great job of getting us out of Paris Climate Accord, getting us out of the W.H.O. to areas where he's doing a terrible job. On the financial coup, Ferrell gave him a . . . I was giving him F's, and Ferrell went down the alphabet giving him a Z.  Trump was a mixed bag.

16:20. FITTS. The president is not running things.  The president is not in charge.  What happened in November 1963?  The U.S. intelligence agencies, military establishment got together and killed the president.  And who controls the Secret Service?  It's the Secretary of the Treasury [today that's Janet Yellen] and the people who run the country.  So the Deep State controls the Secret Service, and there are guns pointing out and there are guns pointing in.  In a highly centralized system, the president has very little power.  Red Button story.  It says everybody in America wants their check.  And the way to get your check is to borrow more money and to print more money.  And so you've had a lit of popular support for the financial coup. And the reason is everybody wants their check.  Put the president in charge.  Hit the population with massive amounts of propaganda and disinformation.  Suddenly, they're screaming they want a vaccine. 

In 2020, the president rolled out the vaccine program that would kill and injure millions of American people.  So he has two reasons for doing it: he's either incompetent or he's breaking the law.  I know what I knew.  I know what I hold him responsible to know and I know what he did.  I know what I would have done: I would have taken a bullet in the head before I implement culling of the American population. 

19:12.  We're talking around in a box where there are no solutions, and we have to go where we can get power and implement real solutions.  In October 2019 when everybody in America was being entertained by the teenage sex life of Supreme Court nominee, Brett Cavanaugh, the House, the Senate, and the White House, Democrat, Republican, both sides of the aisle got together and approved Statement 56 of the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, which said that they could keep secret books.  That was everybody.  Together.  So there is no right versus left.  There is no Trump versus Biden.  There is a machine, a spending machine, that is financed with our taxes, and debt borrowed in our name that is being sold into our pension funds and retirement accounts.  There is that machine, and that machine to keep balancing the books is implementing a depopulation plan.  That is the reality that has to be faced and changing the president won't matter.  Now, if you've got your head out of Washington, DC, and started to focus on your state legislators and local leaders, you could start to make progress protecting yourself against the machine.  If you want to make real progress against the machine, you've got to talk turkey about where your money is going, what it's doing, and who are local leaders in the state legislature who are going to support when this machine fails you which if it doesn't do it in 2023, it's going to do it in 2024.  So you better be ready.  You don't have any more time to worry about Trump or Biden.  

2023 the Year from Hell?

 

They just don't understand currency . . . ever.  

Thank you to Martin Armstrong @ Armstrong Economics. 

9:15  “Oh, the dollar is going to crash, and gold is going to go up.”  That does not happen. 

The U.S. is the reserve currency of the world.  We will be the last to fall, not the first.  And what makes things really worse for the world is the dollar going up, not down, because you have all of these emerging markets that issue debt in dollars, so you have Sri Lanka falling, Lebanon falling.  In China, you’ve got all kinds of riots.  Even three years ago, Beijing was warning the provinces and banks, “Do not borrow in dollars.  But they were borrowing in dollars because, oh, geez, it was a cheaper interest rate.  And they had no concept of foreign exchange risk.  I saw that in the 1980s when I got called in to solve such a crisis that was in Australia.  

10:25  You have a low-glow interest rate but now you need twice as many dollars to pay back.  

10:35  That's what happened in Australia.  The bankers were selling Swiss mortgages.  "Oh, you'll save interest."  But then the currency swings and suddenly you owe 20% more.  The same thing happened in Europe when the Swiss franc and the euro peg broke in 2015.  They again had sold all of these Swiss mortgages to save money on interest.  So you've had the same thing.  You've had all of these emerging markets, and people in China doing things in dollars because the interest rate was virtually zero, 0%.  Oh, gee, look at how much we're saving, and now the dollar is going up and you're seeing bank runs and this is what we're talking about here.  Actually, really the first financial crisis I was called into was in 1973.  It was Franklin National Bank that failed, and it failed basically on a 7% move of the Italian lira.  They were funded basically from Italy, and that brought down Franklin National Bank.  Ever since then just about every financial crisis and currency crisis I've been called into.  Oh, get the guy that did that one.  They just don't understand currency . . . ever.  

12:08  In 2008, when Anheuser Busch got bought by InBev, the euro was $1.60 to the U.S. dollar.  Wow, what a deal.  Now, you fast-forward two or three years, or however many years that was, uh, 14 years, now the euro is par with the dollar.  And you're saying that anybody holding dollar debt in Euro is going to get creamed with this exchange rate because now they've got to pay back even more dollars, right?  

12:40  This is one of the major financial problems that's been going on since the 1970s.  They still do not teach foreign exchange risk in universities.  It's mind-boggling.  When I got called in in 1985, when they were forming the G-5, I wrote a letter to Reagan, telling him that he was going to create a crash in 2 years.  "Oh, yeah, you shouldn't go out of committee, . . . "  You just sold a 1/3 of the national debt to Japan and then you stand up and say that you want the dollar down 40%?  Don't you think they're going to sell?  And they just scratch their head and they say, "Well, why?" 

13:35  Gas deal.  Currency moves can be much worse than interest rate moves.  

13:48  Oh, yeah, currencies can move 20% to 30% in one to two years.  The British pound was like $2.40 in 1980, and it went to par at $1.03 in 1985.  

14:12  What about Deutsche bank?  What about Commerce Bank?  What about Credit Swisse's credit default swaps?  What about Germans and the gas that is cut way back and the economy tanking.  What about these banks?  Don't they have to have a good economy to stay afloat?  

14:29  Absolutely. 

14:30  Could we have a crash in Deutsche Bank?  Because it was the most systemically dangerous bank, according to the IMF, and nothing's changed.  Isn't Deutsche Bank the most systemically dangerous bank still in the world?  It could take down at least Europe?

14:50  All of these things are very real crises.  I can tell you that in speaking with the top three banks in New York City, they refuse to accept any European sovereign debt as collateral.  Period.  That is what started the whole RePo Crisis in 2019.  The real story was they were not willing to accept any sort of collateral on Europe from the European banks on an overnight basis.  You had Merkel coming out and saying "Oh, well we're not going to bail out Deutsche Bank," and she had to say because she refused to allow Greek banks to be bailed out.  Now you're on the opposite side of the table.  Why would you deal with Deutsche Bank if she just said "if they went belly up, sorry, we're not bailing them out."  So that's why the Fed had to step and start becoming the market maker in the RePo markets because banks are not willing, in the United States, to accept any European sovereign debt.  Period.  

16:06  Do you think this is what Socrates is picking up in the August-September time frame--that there's going to be a debt crisis?  

16:15  This is, I think, honestly why they're pushing for war.  This is Schwab's idea, and I've been on the opposite side of the table from him.  Even in our Rome conference, March 2019, Nigel Farage came to be our guest speaker, and he said 

Climate engineering is this primary causal factor for the protracted drought not just in the western U.S. but many other parts of the world.

Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he goes One-on-One with climate researcher Dane Wigington, founder of GeoEngineeringWatch.org for 7.16.22.  

This topic seems current lately after listening to Tom Luongo's talk on inside outside money.  

Whereas Robert Barnes, Meryl Nass, and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. have been leading the fight against mandates and fraudulence within pharmaceutical companies, others have stepped up in their respective industries.  I've never heard of Dane Wigington, so I am looking forward to what he has to say.  

Okay, looking at satellite photography, Wigington is saying that extended drought situation is with us that mainstream and official sources are sweeping under the rug, and we're talking about 40 million people in the west will be without water by the drying out of the Colorado River, basin, tributaries, reservoirs.  If you look what GeoEngineeringWatch.org and we stated on the record going back a decade and a half was done in 2008, paid for out of pocket, by Geo Engineering.org.  Our first full page newspaper ad in California.  He stated what was coming a decade and a half ago.  How did he know? If Climate Geo Engineering continued, and they were, this had to happen.  We're not guessing or speculating.  We know the drought causing effects stratospheric aerosol geo engineering, that is well acknowledged by the scientific community.  When you fill the atmosphere up with too many condensation nuclei, you diminish and disperse, you migrate it somewhere else.  So you have droughts and deluge all of which is crushing crops.  And it's not "coming," off in the future somewhere.  It's here now.  And will radically worsen from here on.  Again, we're looking at satellite imagery testing the precipitation, showing us what's in the air column.  We took a NOAA flying lab, National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, altitude test behind heavy aircraft.  There's no speculation, no hypothesis, no conjecture in any of this.  Climate engineering is this primary causal factor for the protracted drought not just in the western U.S. but many other parts of the world.

He doesn't give a time frame or what kind of consumption restrictions residents will be under. Hunter holds up a rain map of the western states to show how bad of a drought condition California, Nevada, Utah, Texas, and even Colorado is in.  And Wigington points directly to the geo engineering that modifies the weather patterns and that leaves a lattice of streaks tens of miles across the sky.

Shot #1: immune system depleted 30%; Shot #2: immunity depleted 50% to 60%; after booster, 80% of immunity lost.

This is Greg Hunter, USA Watchdog, interview with Dr. Elizabeth Eads, a must-listen, though that headline loses its meaning these days when everything important related to vaccines and COVID and SARS-CoV-2 is more nightmarish than the previous article you read or the last interview you watched.  

But Dr. Elizabeth Eads [Twitter feed, CBJ interview on microchips and 5G, 6G, & 7G, SGT Report], does an excellent job of laying out the politics behind COVID, the politics behind hospitalized treatments for patients with "COVID," the biological science of what and how the unvaccinated are getting infected, and they are getting infected.  So let's begin.  

We’re seeing from the jab all kinds of underreported side-effects.  We’re seeing infertility in women, we’re seeing miscarriages in women, we’re myocarditis, pericarditis, MI, pulmonary embolism, blood clots anywhere in the body.  We’re seeing swollen lymph nodes, swollen testicles.  Dr. Cole from the Mayo Clinic is seeing an increase in reported cancers.  We’re seeing that as well in the hospitals—blood clots, strokes, hemorrhagic strokes, dementias, new-onset strokes in young people, blood clots in young people, and that reference to the military where 4 soldiers had chest pains or blood clots, pulmonary embolism.

They must realize they’ve committed crimes against humanity in some of these hospitals and doctors—not you—but some of these must know that they’re part of a cover-up.  These hospital administrators and doctors must realize that they've committed some real crimes against humanity. 

Eads, 3:09  Oh, my God, it is just striking, Greg.  The problem with doctors in America is that 60% to 70% of doctors across America are owned by the hospitals or they’re employed by the hospital or their practices are owned by the hospital.  And they were told that they had to follow these CDC protocols, no "ifs," "ands," or "buts" or they were to lose their jobs.  Also, they are not reporting to the VAERS system.  Less than 1% or 2% are actually being reported to nurses and doctors in the hospital because of threats.  This is medical tyranny.  

Hunter, 3:45  This can't be getting any better.  What I'm hearing from a variety of sources is that this is just the beginning.  You're saying that this is just COVID deaths, that this is "all of these other increased things" [wow, that was awkward] which are side-effects of the vaccines.  Is that what you're saying?  

Eads, 4:10  Right now across America, approximately 70% of hospitals are full of those that have had the jab or had side-effects or those that have a life-threatening infection from antibody-dependent enhancement from getting one, two, or three jabs.  It has destroyed the immune system.  After the first shot, your immune system is depleted by 30%, after the second shot between 50% and 60%, and they're guessing that it's 80% after the booster, after the third and fourth.  

Hunter, 4:55  I know you're not in the room, you're in the hospital, so I know that you're not privy to what they're doing, but could you make a speculative guess as to why they're doing this?  Because with all of the data, these shots don't seem like anything that is really helping any population.  What is the motivation for them to do this to people? 

Eads, 5:20  Well, I can tell you that there are some pretty evil people all the way back to the New World Order, Agenda 2030, people like Gates, Fauci, Soros, and Klaus Schwab are all about depopulation.  This is Satanic, and you have to understand that Fauci's budget at NIAID is $6 billion.  He funds all of the research across all of the hospitals and [medical] colleges across America.  And if you didn't buy into these jabs and this CDC protocol treatment, whether you are a doctor, a nurse, an administrator, a CFO, a CEO, your FUNDING is in jeopardy of being pulled.  And these doctors are being threatened with their jobs by not following and using these killer CDC protocols, which includes Remdesivir, Decadron, Vancomycin, Daptomycin, DMARDS, which stands for Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and, of course, the killer, ventilation when we know that Ivermectin is on the NIH protocol; it's on the NIH site and it's numbered Table 2E as approved for it to be used in the hospital and it's not being used.  This is medical tyranny.  [I wished people would stop using that phrase; rather, get on with a plan, a strategy to bring this hell to a halt.]  Remdesivir failed.  It had a 53% mortality rate in the African Ebola study.  In a Gilead study, it was stopped after 4 days because 23% of those in the study developed renal failure, liver failure, life-threatening liver failure, renal failure, yet Fauci still chose that.  So you have to think about a nefarious reason why Fauci chose Remdesivir over Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine.  This is nefarious.  This is a crime against humanity.  These protocols are killing patients.  The Remdesivir people are going into renal failure; they're going into liver failure; they're going into pulmonary edema, and then they require ventilation.  It is just disgusting. 

Hunter, 7:55  It seems like . . . I had Dr. Pierre Kory on [whose affiliate site is FLCCC], who is one of the top pulmonary, ICU doctors in the country, if not the world and would not believe this had he not said it, but he's trying to get people to stay out of the hospital because of their anemic protocols for treating COVID.  And this is another quote, that "it helps the few, and fails the many." The hospitals that you're involved with, are they using this anemic protocol that looks like they're not really saving people but that they want people to die? 

Eads, 8:35  Well, the hospitals in northeast Florida where I am at are absolutely using the CDC protocol.  There are some doctors who have stepped out of the protocols recently and started using Hydrochloroquine and Ivermectin.  But by and large, across Florida and across the country, they're sticking with these CDC protocols, and the doctors are refusing to look at the patents, to look at the studies, to look at the Remdesivir studies, and to do the research.  It is stunning.  

Hunter, 9:14  Are they doing this just to keep a job?  Let me get this straight: so they're being threatened with their job . . . so in order to keep their job, they'll just kill people?  This is kind of like Nazi prison guard stuff.  

Eads, 9:25  This is worse than the Nazi camps and Dr. Mengele and his experimentation.  MIT came out last week with an estimate of 500,000 deaths.  They looked at all of the reporting agencies.  They looked at CMS; they looked at Medicaid; they looked at VAERS; they looked at all of the reporting agencies (supposedly, there are eleven of them), and their numbers are close to 500,000 deaths already.  And we know that VAERS only reports 1%.  CMS and Medicaid for those over 65; those numbers were pulled by Thomas Renz, a whistleblower, and they were 45,000 to 50,000.  But we're looking at 500,000 and we're headed into flu season now.  And these people who received the jab have no immune system left; there are going to be mass deaths this winter.  And I bet we are going to reach numbers in the millions.

Hunter, 10:30  That's what I'm hearing.  You're saying that this is like having HIV where you don't have an immune system anymore.  

Eads, 10:45  Well, it's interesting that you bring that up because what was found in the vaccine and in the parasite, called Hydra Vulgaris, which was spliced and translated into there was HIV sequence I through III, and AIDS SV, ah, AIDS was sequenced right into there.  And we know that 5% of these vials circulating throughout the country in 13 states are causing the majority of the deaths.  And we have proof from Dr. Cole and various epidemiologists, virologists, and hematologists across the country that CD8 and CD4 cell counts drop drastically after the first, second, and third shots, which is consistent with immune deficiency, which is consistent with AIDS.

Hunter, 11:50  You're telling me that, in effect, that 5% of these vials gave people AIDS, AIDS-like symptoms, or AIDS-like reactions? 

Eads, 12:07  Absolutely.   Now, the vials, the lot number for the vials, this is breaking news, they went out to 13 states; they represent 5% of all of the vials in America.  Pfizer EK9231 has represented 3,500 deaths so far.  Moderna 039K20A: 4,000 deaths so far.  And the Moderna 041L20A was actually pulled off the market in California because of too many acute anaphylactic reactions but this wasn't pulled from the rest of America.  And, Greg, I got to ask you, what 13 states did these bad lots go to?  I'm going to hypothesize that they were red states.  There's no FDA oversight; there's no DOJ oversight.  There's no review board.  This is pre-meditated murder. 

Hunter, 13:24  They're forcing all of this on the military.  FDA or CDC came out saying that natural immunity is not as good as our shot that the shots are better than natural immunity.  Is that true? 

Eads, 13:58  Absolutely false.  Look, we know from 20 years ago that SARS-CoV-1 that 70% of the world still has long-lasting immunity against SARS-CoV-1 because we did the studies, 7 years in, 10 years in, 17 years in, and we checked T-cells.  And those who recovered from SARS-CoV-1 is 70% in the world have long-lasting antibodies, still have antibodies.  So this is just not true. Also, when you get the jab, you are injecting the mRNA envelope or spike protein, depending on whether it's J&J, AstraZeneca, Moderna, or Pfizer, and those antibodies are only synthetic antibodies; they only recognize SARS-CoV-2 sequences.  They do not recognize other viruses.  So if you're exposed to the flu or respiratory syncytial virus or rotavirus or any kind of bacterial infection, those antibodies are not going to respond and react and your immune system is going to be suppressed and it's not going to respond and react.  And those patients are going to land in the hospital and they're going to be critically ill on a ventilator, and this winter it's going to be Hell.  

Hunter, 15:25  What can people do?  Dr. Pierre Kory suggested taking Ivermectin a couple of times a week, you should be taking zinc, you should be taking vitamin Z? [I think he means vitamin D; see Kory's protocol FLCCC].  He says that we have a calamity of non-treatment on the way in, and then anemic treatment in hospitals after you get it.  What should people do?  

Eads, 15:52  First, seek early treatment.  Get on the Ivermectin with the Zithromax, or the Doxycycline, with the Ivermectin or the Hydroxychloroquine with the Zithromax.  Seek early treatment.  Get a nebulizer.  Get the medications for the nebulizer at home if you have COPD, asthma, pulmonary disorders.  If you have COPD asthma, get the oxygen.  Get ready for the fall.  Have the vitamin C, zinc, vitamin D, Quercetin, the NAC, there is a product called Singulair [a prescription for inflammation in the lung lining], aspirin, Eliquis [a prescription anticoagulant], Xarelto  [prescription to prevent blood clots; Nattokinase is a naturally occurring enzyme that inhibits both platelet and fibrin clots], good nutrition with oxygenating foods, and, um, again, have something on hand to protect from the spike protein because we do know [16:54] that those with the spike protein are transmitting.  And by the way, the spike protein is the Lentivirus [the Lentivirus, a genus of retroviruses that cause chronic and deadly diseases characterized by long incubation periods, in humans and other mammalian species.^[1] The genus includes the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which causes AIDS.]  The people who took the jabs are the ones having these fake variants.  Mutations occur.  Spike proteins do contain the Lentivirus, so they are passing viruses to unvaccinated people, that is true: transmission is true.    

Hunter, 17:25  You say you haven't put down COVID as a reason for death.  Why is that?  

Eads, 17:34  Because COVID does not exist.  It was a computer-generated genomic sequence.  I pulled all of the patents: there were 4,000 patents.  I pulled and looked at patents with Karen Kingston, who was on a 2-hour show recently with John Di Lemme at Conservative Business Journal.  She went through all of the patents regarding all of the AI delivery devices and I have studied . . . I looked at the slides, I've studied the virus under the microscope.  I've looked at what is in these vaccines, and SARS-CoV-2 does not exist.  What does exist is a bioweapon: the Hydra Vulgaris and the spike protein are the bioweapons. 

Hunter, 18:25  Karen Kingston is one tough . . . she's not one to . . . she's been frozen out of Big Pharma, and I am sure that you're going to take a lot of grief for coming on and talking about this.  Karl Deninger, who is a brilliant guy who put a lot of money into the tech world, owned his company, brilliant guy, writer, data analyst, you name it, he says that we have certain lots that have 7-10 times deaths and injuries than other vaccine lots.  This should be evenly spread.  If the whole thing is done correctly, but no, the distribution is way out of whack.  You mean to tell me that the CDC and the FDA and the NIH don't know that certain lots are way more dangerous than other lots?  

Eads, 19:13  Oh, they absolutely realize this.  Listen, this was supposed to be at Phase I, II, and III at the same time with control groups.  There are no control groups, Greg.  This is completely out of control. There's no oversight.  There's absolutely no FDA, no CDC, no DOJ, no Review Board oversight, nobody is following up on those that were in the study, following up on their progress, their adverse reactions, or their antibody levels.  And by the way, antibody levels weren't even followed in the early studies.  

Hunter, 19:55  They're talking about vaxxing kids. 

Eads, 20:30   Right.  They've lost their protection.  In fact, Greg, they were supposed to release their list of ingredients 14 days after Pfizer's announcement of Comirnaty, and they didn't.  They basically defaulted from being free from lawsuits despite the 1986 law giving them immunity to all vaccines.  

Hunter, 20:55  This is why you're saying that this is completely out of control.  

Eads, 21:05  I have a local pharmacist that I work with, and I called him every week and asked him to print me off a package insert.  And you have to understand that when this vaccine was rolled out, end of January, beginning of February, the boxes came with a completely blank package insert.  Completely blank.  That is against all prescribing rules.  And even as of this week, the package insert for ingredients is blank.  Everything else is listed there, but the ingredients list is blank.  Completely out of control and completely dangerous.  There is no informed consent being given.  Greg, how can you give informed consent to a patient when you don't know what is in the vaccines?  And you can't say because we haven't had any study results on what the adverse effects are.  

Hunter, 22:20  Are they just going to go for killing as many people as they can?  Are they not worried about being prosecuted in the mother of all Nuremberg Trials?  

Eads, 22:30  Yes, now listen.  These people--they don't care.  You know this is about Big Pharma, Big Money, the hospitals are making a full $3,128 for a full 7-day Remdesivir IV.  They're making $39,000 if a patient with COVID goes to ICU and is ventilated.  And they're making much more money on top of that.  You can actually go to the CMS site and you can see all of the reimbursement codes and what is paid out to all of the doctors related to COVID.  And let me tell you what's happening.  People are being tested at the door of the Emergency Room, whether they're there for COVID symptoms or not.  They might be there for an accident.  They might be there for a trauma.  They might be there for simple bronchitis.  Everybody is tested.  And then once you test positive, and by the way, 97% of all the PCR Tests are false positives.  It was never intended to be used for infectious diseases.  Once you test positive, you are immediately sent to a COVID unit, which reimburses the hospital quite a lot of money.  And if you have pneumonia and you require oxygen, you're then sent to the Intensive Care Unit, which then gives the hospital a higher reimbursement level.  This is about money, and just following orders--nurses, doctors, pharmacists--will not get you off in Nuremberg 2.0 which has already started in Europe. 

Hunter, 24:13  Let me see if I can't get this right.  One doctor told me that if you incentivize murder and wrong-doing, you get more of it.  

Eads, 24:23  Absolutely.  

Hunter, 24:25  If they get someone sent to the ICU and kill them off, the hospital gets $39,000. 

Eads, 24:33   Ah, plus.  If they give Remdesiver, it's $39,000 plus another $3,000 for the Remdesivir.  There are Extended Services Codes.  The reimbursement is high to the hospitals.  And you know the ICU level care gives them Remdesivir with 53% mortality.  Give them Decadron with another 4% mortality.  Give them Decadron for with Vancomycin secondary pneumonia and that puts them into renal failure, which then ventilates them, which then puts them into pulmonary edema, and then they need to undergo dialysis for the renal failure.  It's big bucks.  

Hunter, 25:13  This sounds like a protocol of death.  

Eads, 25:15  It is a protocol of death.  If you had a 60% of dying by going into the hospital,