As I laid out in this report, Creating World War III, martial law was declared once in the United States during the 20th century. Because the president never challenged and endorsed it, it was in place for several years. I have also reviewed the Supreme Court decisions on this subject, and shockingly, martial law is valid if you also close down the courts.
Most people do not know the legal system very well since they are not taught the details in school, other than law school, to a minimal extent. The federal courts are STATUTORY, not Constitutional. The president can shut down all the federal courts. The ONLY court created by the Constitution that the president cannot shut down is the Supreme Court. All other courts exist at the PLEASURE of the government.
Okay, so I wished that Martin could parse out the differences in courts here. I will try my best after searching the internet, noooooooooooooo!!!
Okay, So I found this,
It’s essential to understand how constitutional vs statutory law underscores the significance of these principles. While statutory laws are created by legislative bodies, they can never contravene the established constitutional mandates. This interaction reveals the balance of power and the role of the constitution in safeguarding individual rights.
And there's this,
Statutory law refers to the body of law created by legislative bodies through the enactment of statutes. Unlike constitutional law, which derives its authority from constitutions, statutory law is rooted in the laws passed by legislative entities, such as Congress at the federal level or state legislatures at the state level. Understanding this process is vital for distinguishing between the realms of constitutional vs statutory law.
Okay, so statutory refers to laws generated by legislative bodies, but they can never "contravene the established constitutional mandates." Statutory law is rooted in the laws passed by legislative entities, such as Congress at the federal level or state legislatures at the state level.
from Legal Insight USA,
Gold has got nothing to do with inflation. Gold goes up basically when you're questioning the future, who is going to survive? Gold goes up generally when there is a collapse in confidence in government, and that typically centers around war. --Martin Armstrong
"That was basically caused by OPEC raising the price of oil dramatically and that created a cost-push inflation. So everybody's costs were rising dramatically. Anything that had to do with plastic, went up dramatically and that created eventually the inflationary boom between 1976 going into 1980. As for gold rose to $875, etc...I think gold was about a $100 in 1976 and it rose to about $400 but that was by December 1979, the last six weeks of the rally, which peaked in 1980 on January 21st. So from December to January 21st, that's when Russia invaded Afghanistan. So it was the geopolitical stuff that took gold from $400 to $875. So it's important to understand inflation is not the major driving power but inflation when war is around – that's what broke Bretton Woods...it was the Vietnam War."
I have said historically that the LEFT is always the most violent because the foundation of what they preach is that they are the victims of the rich. Vance actually made this point.
"The big difference between conservatives and liberals is that no one has tried to kill Kamala Harris in the last couple of months,” Vance said. “And two people now have tried to kill Donald Trump in the last couple of months.” --Martin Armstrong
This is NOT a Democrat vs Republican election. This is Neocons vs American People. --Martin Armstrong
“For twenty-three years, it was the most influential, and often the most interesting, publication of the American right, championing a less dreary and more adventurous conservatism, one that insisted that Washington was the center of human events.”
Indeed, Russia has an opportunity to now annihilate the entire invading force, including Americans, by deploying a small tactical nuclear weapon inside its own borders. Nobody can say anything about that, and Russia would be within its right to do so just as if Chinese, Russian, or North Korean private military invaded the United States. --Martin Armstrong
The Neocons used Biden to circumvent Congress to create World War III, deploying private armies to negate Congressional approval. --Martin Armstrong
Thank you to Martin Armstrong's "Americans Usurping American Foreign Policy & Assassinations for Regime Change."
Let’s make this very clear about Bolton. John Bolton was a fervent supporter of the Vietnam War, yet he managed to avoid combat through a student deferment followed by enlistment in the Maryland Air National Guard. He is always willing to send American boys to their deaths but sought a deferment for himself. Bolton openly supported the United States’ interference in other countries under his philosophy that, somehow, we have the right to carry out regime changes worldwide. That is precisely what got JFK assassinated by the CIA because they were engaging in regime change, assassinating leaders, and he wanted to terminate the CIA. --Martin Armstrong
Thank you to Martin Armstrong's "Trump Beware--This May Be Only the First," found at Armstrong Economics.
They tried to get Gorbachev to join NATO, which set off the coup against him in Russia, ending with Yelsin becoming Russia’s leader. When they tried to blackmail Yeltsin to stick in their puppet, Boris Berezovsky, that is when Yeltsin turned to Putin because the Communists were also trying to impeach him. Putin was neither an oligarch nor a communist. That is why Hillary blamed Putin for interfering in the 2016 election, for they had interfered in the Russian 2000 election. --Martin Armstrong
The very idea of assassinating leaders such as President Lincoln and President McKinley was part of an international trend that began during the 19th century and was based upon the theory that some dramatic deed was necessary to spark a revolution. It was called the "Propaganda of, or by, the deed,” and it advocated physical violence in a dramatic, provocative public act perpetrated against political enemies to inspire others to act in a popular mass rebellion or revolution. This was a political philosophy that was part of the radical thought process that was emerging with Marxism. Still, it was not precisely advocated by Marx, who was generally a revolutionary.
There have been four Presidents assassinated and three who were wounded, with two misses since 1865.
1865, Abraham Lincoln, April 14th
1881, James A. Garfield, July 2nd
1901, William McKinley, September 6th
1912, Theodore Roosevelt, October 14th (wounded)
1933, Franklin D. Roosevelt, February 15 (5 shots fired missed)
1963, John F. Kennedy, November 22nd
1975, Gerald Ford, September 5th, and 22nd (missed)
1981, Ronald Reagan, March 30 (wounded)
2005, George W. Bush, May 10 (hand grenade thrown but was dud).
2024, Donald Trump, July 13th (wounded)
What Putin does not get is that our wonderful Neocons care nothing about the country, the people, and certainly not the economy. He keeps warning – is this what you really want? They do not back down and want war so bad they can taste it in their sleep. --Martin Armstrong
Thanks to Martin Armstrong @ Armstrong Economics.
Putin keeps trying to warn the American Neocons that they are playing with World War III, which will be nuclear. They issued a Notice to Air Missions (NOTAM) that they will be firing missiles in a test just off the coast of northern California coast, thereby alerting pilots of Russian missile launches to LAND / IMPACT in the Oakland Air Route Traffic Control Center ((ARTCC). This will begin tomorrow and continue for 10 days. This is 300 miles offshore in international waters.
What Putin does not get is that our wonderful Neocons care nothing about the country, the people, and certainly not the economy. The Climate Change zealots in the White House agree with them and think reducing the population may be the only way to reach their NET ZERO target for CO2. He keeps warning – is this what you really want? They do not back down and want war so bad they can taste it in their sleep.
The first week of June in a Panic Cycle and the climate change nuts are punching for restrictions on travel this summer and the date is June 6th is what they are shooting for. They want to curtain your summer vacation this year to reduce CO2. If they can throw in war – fantastic! The only question they indeed to ask after World War III – Did we get enough of them to save the planet?
Musk saying the quiet parts out loud. Neocons and Ukrainians (but I repeat myself) hate him for it. https://t.co/nlqJr7LRR1
— Tom Luongo (Give Deflation a Chance!) (@TFL1728) October 17, 2022
