The Great Poisoning, 1995-2025

Actions people can take: 

Cost of capital.  Big banks pay 0% or 1%, or getting bailed out and getting capital for free, whereas most Americans are paying 17% + on their credit cards and high prices on their mortgage.  Now I dare say, if your neighbor could buy all the homes in your neighborhood for 0% or 1%, and you had to pay 5% to 7% on your mortgage, you know what's going to happen after many years, Del, right?  

CATHERINE AUTIN FITTS: And so what Trump is saying is that everything is on the table, because if I'm going to . . . if this model is going to work, we've got to get radical and change it.

She grew up on the streets of West Philadelphia.

Her dad was a doctor/surgeon out of the war. 

17:40.  At the end of World War II, George Keenan at the State Department, a very famous Diplomat, said, "We have 6% of the people and we control 50% of the resources.  And the only way we can keep that going is to drop a lot of bombs, and we are going to have to be very forceful and tough."

So Goldwater came along and he ran for president and he said, "We're going to have to drop a lot of bombs," and he lost, and the American people were like "No we're good Christians. We don't want to do that.

So Jimmy Carter came along and he said, "Okay, we're going to cut back," and he shivered in front of the fireplace, and said, "We have to cut back because we can't control all of the resources," and the American people said, "Oh, no, we like being powerful."

And so the Bushes came along, and they said, "You know something, you all are good Christians.  Here's your check.  Don't ask questions." So that was the political equation: "I will go off and run the global Empire.  I will extract a tithe for the empire.  We will make a lot of money.  I'll get rich, but I'll give you a check in the story of 'I am good.'"  So the political equation in America is we give you a check, and we give you the story of "I am good."  

And the problem that politicians have is the same one that that you have in the EU, the former head, the president of the EU said, "We know what to do.  We just don't know how to get elected after we do it."

19:20.  Trump has got a greater challenge now because that was 2000.  Let's talk about his challenge now.  If the first hundred days are really important for a president, what will he do in the first 100 days? 

19:32.  Here's the question: how much is what he will do, what he wants to do, and how much is what his major donors insist that he do?  And to me, that's the big question, and how much is it that the central bankers will insist that he do, you know, because they're financing the US government.  And if they say no he can't do it, but he's a prisoner of the red button problem, and, you know, will the American people support him in doing what has to be done?  There's not . . . we're talking about a society that doesn't share a common map of what's going on.  For example, if you look at what has happened with military technology and what the Russians are doing both with their new missiles and what they're doing in the North Sea in the Arctic, around the Arctic, it makes absolute sense that if you are Trump and you're responsible for military protection of a whole wide world of global interests, including Canada, it makes absolute sense you would want Greenland.  And yet when you hear him talk about it, you think, is this guy crazy?  But, in fact, if you look at the responsibility of running the global trade routes for the Western world and being responsible for military protection of the US, Canada, and European allies in NATO, . . .

21:00.  So you would be in favor of that?

21:03.  No.  I'm not saying I would be in favor of it.  What I'm saying is you have a model, and the model has to re-engineer, and you have to get the revenues up and the expenses down and take care of your responsibilities and it's a lot more difficult than it looks. And because of the changes in technology all around the world in many different Industries, you've really got to change.  And so what Trump is saying is that everything is on the table, because if I'm going to . . . if this model is going to work, we've got to get radical and change it.

21:35. So what kind of person do you see in Trump?

21:41.  Trump is a real estate developer and a business person, and it's very interesting.  If you live and work in New York as I did for 11 years, everything you do has to be economically successful or relevant, and you approach things from a point of view of cooperating to get a positive economic result.  So in New York things, everything starts, you know, every sentence starts with "Yes."  

So, could we build a bridge to the Moon?

Yes, but it would take a long time and it would be very expensive. 

Whereas in Washington, everything starts out with "No, no," and you've got a toll booth on every inch with people trying to extract the profit to let you do anything.  And one reason is in New York you have to make things work for the equity.  In Washington, if you're just printing government money, you know the equity doesn't have to work.  So Trump is, if you look at the people he's bringing in, he's looking at redoing the economic model and making it much more economically relevant but he approaches it as an entrepreneur which of course is driving all the people who are trained to be good government officials, it's driving them crazy, because they're not entrepreneurs.

23:00.  Why does he do this?  

23:04.  Because he knows that we need to change and he's trying to find a way to invent a productive change but he's so bold and how he does it and he's much too generous with taxpayers' money for himself . . . 

23:26.   What is his motivation, in your opinion?

23:28.  I think he's very frustrated by the way the world is working now and I think he really feels that he can do something about it is my impression.  

So every hundred years, the Central Banking warfare model does a reset, 80 to 120 years.  If you go back in the history, you know, they regularly do a reset.  We knew we had to do a reset.  We knew we were going to globalize, so we had to do a reset, and I thought I had permission from the group of people I knew, you know, high up in the financial system.  I was going to figure out how technology would impact a family, a business, a government, a not-for-profit, and I was going to figure out how we could re-engineer the model to do a reset successfully.  But I had a vision of a reset and I called it "The Building Wealth Reset," where you can create so much significant wealth bottom up . . . that the American people could continue to maintain a reasonable standard of living in the middle of globalization without having an environmental disaster.  We came up with the initial plans and it was really exciting because there was one brief moment when I really thought it was going to work.  And I presented it.  I had a group of the top pension fund leaders who were an advisory board to one of my subsidiaries of Hamilton [Dillion, Read, & Co.] and I presented the plan to them,  and I'll never forget it.  The president of the largest pension fund looked at me and he said, "Oh, my God."  He said, "This is what we tried to do long ago, but they were able to stop us." And I said, you didn't, you didn't have the technology, the learning metabolism can be so increased that you can get people that productive that fast.  We had built Learning Centers in poor neighborhoods and were able to teach people how to become very economically productive very fast.  And, you know, we had the numbers and the documentation to prove it.  And he looked at me, he was stunned, and he said, "It's too late.  They've given up on the country.  They're moving all the money out starting in the fall," and that was when the $21 trillion started to go missing from the US government.

25:39.  $21 trillion?

25:40.  $21 trillion, so in the mid-90s the government was supposed to start publishing their annual audits of their financial statements because under the Constitution you're supposed to report, you know, here's how much money we collected or borrowed, and here's how much we spent, and you're required to do that disclosure with the exception of the black budget piece.  So the government started a process of reporting undocumentable adjustments in between fiscal 1998 and 2015.  They reported $21 trillion of undocumentable adjustments.  At the time we published that number, $21 trillion in 2017, the U.S. debt was up to $21 trillion.  So the US government borrows $21 trillion, the money comes in to Treasury, and then $21 trillion disappears.  

26:49.  The big question is where does it end?  

26:53.  So I thought he meant that we are reallocating the equity in the Pension funds to invest in the Emerging Markets which made sense what I didn't understand though is that's not what he meant he literally they started to move trillions and trillions of dollars out of the federal you know they borrow money and pull the money out and they were literally building a second civilization separately they were literally draining as much money as they could through the federal mechanism because remember that's just a laundry from the Pension funds you sell a treasury bond to the pension funds and you move the money to Treasury, you take it out the back door, and you're just moving the money out of the pension funds into I'm assuming it's a new endowment for a new government.  So we are in the middle of a reset, and that reset is fundamentally changing how the financial system will work.  The central bankers want who basically are the key bureaucracy, and if they want to do what they want to do which is to take over control of fiscal policy and be free of the Constitutional framework, they need changes.  And that's the war that's going on right now, and Trump will have to be right in the middle of that.

28:15.  So this new society in the short term, how's it going to look like?  

28:19.  I used to say that COVID was the operation by which the new Society broke back in and took control.  So what they want is they want digital IDs, they want all digital monetary system, they want the central bankers controlling fiscal policy.  So the central bankers can literally decide what the taxes are and just take it out of your account.

28:40.  A new currency? 

28:42.  It's not a currency, it's a control system.  There are no markets.  It's technocracy.

28:50.  He claims he's going to drain the swamp.

28:51. No that's not going to happen.  

28:53.  At the same time, he's working with people like . . . you can't re-engineer the model and you and your pals make money and drain the swamp at the same time.  That's not going to happen.  So, you know, his number one focus is going to be re-engineering the model of getting it economic, and while he's doing that, unfortunately, he's got a whole lot of major donors who are trying to maximize their profit.  So he's got to manage that.

29:19.  So he's not going to drain the swamp.

29:20.  There are three questions.  Is he going to implement a digital ID?  Because then he's implementing the swamp.  Is he going to allow an all digital monetary system?  Because then he's building the swamp.  Is he going to allow the DOGE and Vivek and Elon to let the central bankers take over control of fiscal policy through corporate contractors?  Then he's implementing the control model, one, two, three.  Now he can do that on the all-digital monetary system.  He can do that with CBDC.  Or, he can let the FED get out of the Constitutional provisions and do Central Bank CBDCs, which will probably be the way you go after you beat everybody up with crypto and they make a lot of money.

30:10.  He doesn't seem like a guy that wants that for his voters, and his voters don't seem to want that.

30:16.  So I think it is Trump's instinct to loathe the idea of total central control.  This is a guy who doesn't . . . he wants to be a sovereign individual, and if you look at some of what he says and does I think he really enjoys the idea of being part of a civilization where people have sovereignty both in their governments and individuals.  The reality though is he's in a system where he doesn't have control, which of course always frustrates him.  There will be tremendous pressures on him to do what the bankers want.

31:00.  Also, some people behind the scenes, like Peter Thiel.  Is it Palantir that decides what the government does, or is it the other way around?

31:10.  Of course, that's the question.  I think the government in theory decides because you have a contract in payments, and they only do what they're authorized under the contract and the payments to do.  At the same time, a lot of the bureaucracy is no longer in a position to tell the corporate contractors what they do.  The corporate contractors have more power.  So there's a whole team of people.  Elon Musk is not a person, it's a team and it's playing a role.  And how much is that Elon Musk as a person is still doing?  

31:55.  Can Trump see through that? 

31:56. Of course.  He's operating in his system. He doesn't control the system, and he's dealing with the system the way it is.

32:16.  And he does want to change it in your opinion?

32:19.  O, I think he does want to change it. I think he does want America to remain the global hegemon.  I mean that's what he said, "Make  America great again." He really wants America to be successful.  His biggest problem is that he has allies who think they control him and major donors, so . . .

32:42.  That's an interesting situation.  Trump got into this position first of all because everybody underestimated him, right?

32:53.  No. He got in this position because the Republican establishment decided, okay, this is the guy who can get us the control grid.  This is the guy who can get the heartland to go along with digital IDs to stop . . .

33:09.  Basically that's what I'm saying, because in your opinion, he's not willing to do that.  He's schooling them.

33:17.  I'm saying it is not his inclination.  It is not his nature.  If you're a successful entrepreneur, you know that total control is bad economics and I think he still feels and and I think he still and I think he still feels he wants to make America great again but I think his first time through he understands that you know if you don't do what they say they kill your family right so for example when I finished the litigation I published a book I mean I wrote a book and I wanted to publish it I put it up online because there's so much documentation behind it it was better to do it digital three times I've tried to publish it the last time I tried to publish it they threatened to kill somebody in my family if I did I backed off you know my family didn't buy into this and I don't have a right to put my family at risk but 

34:05.  So the only person who can change the system is someone, some really big interests.

34:10. No.  Here's how you change the system.  You don't change the system by one guy riding in on a white horse and fixing everything.  You change the system by so many people shifting their time, their money, their intention, their prayers, that crowd moves this way and you can't force them to go this way.  It's too out of control.  In 2016, I was planning on not going back if Clinton had won because it wasn't safe.

34:38.  For you?

34:38.  For me.

34:40.  Why?

34:42.  So during litigation I dealt with a huge amount of physical harassment and surveillance and it was very dangerous.

34:48?  Physical harassment?

34:49.  Yeah, oh yeah. 

34:52.  In the US?  What does that look like?  

35:00.  So your house gets broken into.  You get poisoned.  You get followed.  People run you off the road.  

35:08.  They poison you.

35:08.  I was poisoned 8 times.  I wouldn't settle.  We were publishing and designing and making a tool called, Community Wizard, and Community Wizard made accessible . . . Right now, if you go to the White House, or at that time if you go to the White House, and read the federal budget, it says here's how all the money works in military.  Here's how all the money works in housing.  Here's how . . . but it doesn't say here's how all the federal money works in your neighborhood, because if you can see it in your neighborhood you can get it changed, right.  And so the finance chairman of the campaign would get it, but you don't get the disclosure you need to vote for political representation.  You can get some for your state, but even now some for your county, but you can't get really good data.  So we were making a software tool where you could go in and dial and download all the data and start looking in ways that were very visual and you can start to really grapple and that you could start to change the money and make it much more efficient.  And so one of the things that they did was seize our offices.  They seized the software tool and kept it locked up for years.  It took me years to get it back out, and by the time I got it back out it was all Legacy software and we literally tried several times to start from scratch.  The politics were . . . so, in 2019, some of the harassment kicked up again; it was one of the reasons I finally decided to come do the Dutch residency.  And it was really funny because when it happened, you know because I had had so many amazing miraculous experiences dealing with the poisonings and the physical harassment . . .

36:50.  When they poisoned you they were trying to kill you?

36:53.  No.  Here's my theory because you only know what you experienced you don't know what the facts are so there is one time I think it was intended to kill me I think the others were just intended to scare me and make you tired you know it really when you get toxic because I described to people there is in America a great poisoning going on people are really being poisoned and they're being poisoned in a variety of ways and it's intentional and as if you steal people's retirement funds you got to lower life expectancy it's just math.

37:25.  What is your goal in life? 

37:28.  So I just want to be free.  

37:29.  Do you feel free here?

37:30.  What I said to somebody at the time is I'm just tired of playing Tomb Raider.  I just don't . . . if you look at what I want to do in my life, I want to help people figure out the Building Wealth Reset and I want to help people push it in that direction, because the problem is not what are these guys doing.  The problem is when these guys fail, what's our point?

37:54.  Did that change your approach to what you're doing right now? 

37:57.  Yeah I spend a lot less time worrying about security, right.  So I'm a little rusty in terms of my gun use, but no, no I'm very good with a gun I'm very good with a gun.

38:14.  They're not legal here, right, you know?

38:15.  Well I in Hickory Valley there's a joke, so in Hickory Valley, Tennessee, there's a joke that the men have to sleep with bulletproof vests because the women are so well armed.  

If I was Trump, I would do exactly what he's proposing to do at HHS with Kennedy.  I would get the data out and use the data to put the question back to the American people.  Look at the data, what does the data say, and then based on what the data says, what do you think we ought to do?  So he's trying to get the population engaged in helping him re-engineer the model.  His greatest strength is he's always done that, he's always, while the media is trying to just push the official narrative, he's trying to get people educated about reality enough to support him in the changes.

So step by step.

Yeah, so, and, of course, everybody goes crazy because it's like being in a ballroom and everybody's doing the waltz and some guy walks in and says what do you think, should we do a Tango? and starts to play tango music, and everybody starts crashing and bumping into each other and gets mad, you know, because they're like, "A Tango?  What?  I don't know how to do a Tango. I'm going to lose money.

39:40.  Is this transition going to be paid for?

39:42.  Yes.

39:44.  What's that going to look like?

39:49.  Your guess is as good as mine he's going to be trying to recalibrate the model at the same time you've got all these people who are going to be trying to plunder the government now that they've won.  

40:00.  So it's going to be interesting times.

40:01.  It's going to be wild.  It's going to be wild.  So for example,

40:06.  Are you looking forward to it?  So I don't know if you have ever seen . . . my father was a surgeon, so we talked about this at the dinner table, so forgive me, if you've ever seen a serious infection rise to the surface and turn into a a boil that then pops and drains, it's a really despicable process, but it's very good for your health to get the infection to rise to the surface.  So you know the red button question is now rising to the surface, and I think it's, you know, it's healthier than continuing to try and pretend.

40:40.  If you would have a red button here right now on this table and it will bring you in danger and your family in danger would you still push it?

40:50.  Slavery is a worse danger than the chaos that will ensue you know if we push the red button.  I have news for you, the world is pushing it as we speak, so get ready, put on your big boy pants, and get ready to rock and roll.

41:07.  We walked the road to the future.  Is this the future 4 years from now where we are standing?

41:12.  We're standing and we are facing a period of unprecedented change, and what we say at the Solari Report for 2025 is "Our Year Will Be Endowed by Grace," because when things break down and change at this high speed and radical ways, you know it can be very uncomfortable and very disconcerting, but can also open the window for Grace to come in and operate by faith.

41:39.  The sun is shining in your face right now

CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS: "[COVID was] totally...part of doing the Going Direct Reset...every 80 to a 120 years since the central banking warfare model [was] instituted...for 500 years...we have a reset...this is not the first time plague laws have been used to engineer a reset. It's very typical."

"[COVID was] totally...part of doing the Going Direct Reset...every 80 to a 120 years since the central banking warfare model [was] instituted...for 500 years...we have a reset...this is not the first time plague laws have been used to engineer a reset. It's very typical." (1/3)… pic.twitter.com/I1Mbcp4H4g

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) January 10, 2025

CATHERINE AUSTINE FITTS: When the [WEF] says it's 2030 and you have no assets, they're serious. Because when you get that control, the first thing you do is you take all the assets. The second thing you do is...take all the kids... Why would a government run by pedophiles leave the kids in the family

"When the [WEF] says it's 2030 and you have no assets, they're serious. Because when you get that control, the first thing you do is you take all the assets. The second thing you do is...take all the kids... Why would a government run by pedophiles leave the kids in the family?"… pic.twitter.com/mMA35igLZ7

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) September 15, 2024

When the [WEF] says it's 2030 and you have no assets, they're serious. Because when you get that control, the first thing you do is you take all the assets. The second thing you do is...take all the kids... Why would a government run by pedophiles leave the kids in the family?" Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (

@solari_the

) Catherine Austin Fitts describes for Ryan Cristián (

@TLAVagabond

) how "Mr. Global" (Fitts' term that she's used elsewhere) wants to take everyone's assets, as well as their children. "When the [WEF] says it's 2030 and you have no assets, they're serious. Because when you get that control, the first thing you do is you take all the assets," Fitts says. She adds, "the second thing you do is...take all the kids...[because] why would a government run by pedophiles leave the kids in the family?" Furthermore, Fitts says that she's "been squabble-dogging with RFK [Jr.] about Gaza from the beginning...[because] if you will give them [Mr. Global] a get-out-of-jail-free card on the on the genocide of children, then you will give them a get-out-of-jail-free card on the US Treasury, the $21 trillion [stolen by the DOD and HUD], 9/11, [etc.]" "If you look at the syndicate that is controlling policy in Gaza, that syndicate has a very strong overlay with the syndicate that is pushing for financial transaction control," Fitts adds. Partial transcription of clip: "We're talking about a slavery system. I mean, we're talking about the end of the republic, the end of any kind of democratic process, and the end of any human rights. And when the World Economic Forum says it's 2030 and you have no assets, they are serious. Because when you get that control, the first thing you do is you take all the assets. The second thing you do is you're gonna take all the kids...Why would a government run by pedophiles leave the kids in the family? "Any any group of people who have sovereign immunity or the power to operate outside the law or above the law I mean... I've been squabble-dogging with RFK about Gaza from the beginning. And my attitude is if you will give them a get out of jail free card on on the on the genocide of children, then you will give them a get out of jail free card on the US Treasury, the $21 trillion, 9/11...You name it. And and anything goes. If they if somebody has a get out of jail free card who feels free to genocide children in mass, what do you think they're gonna do in the United States when they have, you know, when they have swarms of autonomous drones and autonomous weapons? I mean, what do you think is gonna happen? "Someone who will take if you look at the syndicate that is controlling policy in Gaza, that syndicate has a very strong overlay with the syndicate that is pushing for financial transaction control... I think one of the reasons they need the land, they need the water, and they need the oil and gas is AI and financial transaction control is phenomenally energy demanding. It uses a lot the data centers use a lot of water. It needs a lot of energy, you know, and you need space not only for the operations, but the people. And I think now that the sort of 15 minute city is prototype is over. They don't need the Palestinians for that anymore. You know? Now they need the land. They need the water. They need the oil and gas, and the Egyptians won't take the people. So that's where we are. Yeah. And and so the people who are doing this are the people who are implementing financial transaction control against you. And if you if you give them a get out of jail free card on this, what in the world do you think they're gonna do to you?"

Complete interview with Catherine Austin Fitts

You don't have any more time to worry about Trump or Biden. 

US Government in Full Scale Implosion Because of Corruption – Catherine Austin Fitts "That machine, to keep balancing the books, is implementing a depopulation plan. That is the reality that has to be faced and changing the President won’t matter." https://t.co/pxoT0G51LU

— Greg Hunter (@USAWatchdog) December 21, 2022

Hunter opens up with a Christmas greeting and then tries to console himself over the loss of his friend, CNN and ABC investigative reporter, Drew Griffin, who was a staple here on LA's ABC Eye Witness News on Channel 7 for years.  

Fitts has said that with so many people dying that there will be a glut of things in the market form people's deaths that it will have a deflationary effect on the economy.  People are going to see what's been done to them.  Are you seeing this unfolding now? 

Fitts references the Skidmore Survey from January 2022.  The survey showed that not only were there a significant number of adverse events--deaths and injuries--but there was a significant number of people who understood that it was coming from the injections.  The media has done a remarkably good job at painting a different picture, but at some point you can't defy reality.  So that's coming out and we're seeing it translate into market action.  So in one day we see the insurance companies trading down 30% and funerals trading up 20%, that's a 50% divergence.  So integrating into people lives and their health and in market reaction, it's hard to deny reality. The Doctors 4 COVID Ethics did their 5th symposium on December 19.  Sasha Latypova's "Intent to Do Harm" makes the compelling case that this was not a vaccine, not a pharmaceutical, not a medicine. She said it's a weapon.  The variability in the batches is far too great for it to be classified or described as a medicine or  pharmaceutical.  Of course, if you look at the damage it's caused you can only therefore describe as a weapon.  And she's very experienced.  I mean this is a pharmaceutical executive, somebody coming from the industry, and really knows the ins and outs, the definitions, and legal definitions, regulations, etc.  We're now staring down the barrel of a mass atrocity.  This is a mass atrocity.  This is a depopulation.  This is a genocide.  We're still struggling to find words to describe this.  If you look at the economic restrictions that introduced this it probably killed more people than the injections.  The deaths and injuries are more significant than popularly understood.

5:35. Hunter raises the question of finances. They're running our of money  They can't pay social security.  They can't pay the pensions.  Is this the motivation behind it? 

Something this big has more than one goal, multiple functions, called stacking functions  One, they do want to reset the financial system because we gave had a financial coup d'access to knowledge, and to dramatically increase their politicaltat. But there's something else.  If you look at the central banking warfare model that's run the west for centuries now, if you're the central bankers you cannot maintain control unless you use digital technology to go to complete control.  So digital technology gives the planet the ability for the general population to dramatically increase their learning speed, to dramatically increase their political and economic power unless the central bankers use it for central control.  So you're staring down a situation that is a prisoner's dilemma: you either assert complete control or you lose control.  And I think the central bankers have decided, and the question is why, for a variety of reasons, they're going to assert central control.  Thet have 10 to 20 years to do it and that's what they're moving to do.  They want to chip people like livestock, mind control them like live stock, and have complete control.  Thet don't want to brook any opposition.  And so they're implementing a control system.  It's no longer going to be a financial system.  It's going to be a straight out transaction control system.  And they're saying no freedom of transaction, no freedom of health choices, no freedom of anything.  We want complete control, and unfortunately it looks like that is coming with a form of slavery that is far worse, in my opinion, than historical forms of slavery because it's so physically invasive.  But, now, we're talking about significant depopulation. 

8:10. HUNTER.  Why do they think they can get away with this? 

8:13.  FITTS. One theory:  one scientist who I know and who I have great respect for believes that a lot of what's happened in the last 3 years was to sufficiently terrorize the population to go along with being injected, chipped, and controlled.  Terrorization as a form of marketing the control they want.  Part of this is to put people in fear.  Most important for 2023 is to get out of fear and stay out of fear.  That means being careful not to ingest a lit if TV and not ingesting a lit if mind-control technology.  The reason they think they can get away with it, Greg, is because they've gotten away with ir so far.  I've always said that the crime that pays is the crime that stays. And what we've watched since 1998 is an influential coup and that they've gotten away with it, and the more they get people to ingest massive amounts of propaganda, subliminal programming, all the mind-control tricks.  Now they know that can't last forever, which is why they're talking about putting a chip in you or a neural link in your head all these crazy things.  That's to assert complete control even when you disagree with them.  They can shut down your disagreement. 

Trump put $10 billion dollars into a program Operation Warp Speed to depopulate Americans.  

It takes 10-12 tears to test out a vaccine to make sure it's safe.  

If there was one person in political life who knew how dangerous vaccines are it was Donald Trump. This was a big issue during the campaign expressing his concerns about the vaccines, so he knows.

Trump put Moncef Slaoui in charge of Operation Warp Speed, who was head of research at a pharmaceutical company, GSK, and his expertise was on brain-machine interface.  

I will give Trump credit:  he pulled us out of the W.H.O. and the Paris Climate Accord

Current most dangerous thing is the new treaty from the W.H.O.  They're saying that a 2/3rds vote of the Senate is not required because it's not a change in treaty.  But it is.  It's a new treaty.  Find a template letter at Solari that you can send to your representatives and say you get us out of the W.H.O. and you stop funding the W.H.O. or we're going to be completely stripped of our national sovereignty.  If you go into the W.H.O., you're turning the U.S. into a country who is going to kill you.  

13:00. GREG HUNTER. Is there anyway for Trump to redeem himself?  

13:30, FITTS. I don't know.  If I were in Trump's shoes, I'd say "I made a mistake.  I'm sorry.  And here's what we need to do next year.  But I don't know how you come back from this. L

HUNTER. Karen Kingston was on his True Social, and she got banned, talking about how SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon.  It is.  

14:10. FITTS. You can say Trump was on board for a depopulation or Trump got rolled.  Either one is not a case to be made that he ought to be president.  Then he's incompetent.  You've got to hold people accountable.  You've got to tell the truth and you've got to hold people accountable.  That's the only way out of this.  

15:40. FITTS. Every quarter while Trump was president, we did a report card on Trump. It varied.  Great job of getting us out of Paris Climate Accord, getting us out of the W.H.O. to areas where he's doing a terrible job. On the financial coup, Ferrell gave him a . . . I was giving him F's, and Ferrell went down the alphabet giving him a Z.  Trump was a mixed bag.

16:20. FITTS. The president is not running things.  The president is not in charge.  What happened in November 1963?  The U.S. intelligence agencies, military establishment got together and killed the president.  And who controls the Secret Service?  It's the Secretary of the Treasury [today that's Janet Yellen] and the people who run the country.  So the Deep State controls the Secret Service, and there are guns pointing out and there are guns pointing in.  In a highly centralized system, the president has very little power.  Red Button story.  It says everybody in America wants their check.  And the way to get your check is to borrow more money and to print more money.  And so you've had a lit of popular support for the financial coup. And the reason is everybody wants their check.  Put the president in charge.  Hit the population with massive amounts of propaganda and disinformation.  Suddenly, they're screaming they want a vaccine. 

In 2020, the president rolled out the vaccine program that would kill and injure millions of American people.  So he has two reasons for doing it: he's either incompetent or he's breaking the law.  I know what I knew.  I know what I hold him responsible to know and I know what he did.  I know what I would have done: I would have taken a bullet in the head before I implement culling of the American population. 

19:12.  We're talking around in a box where there are no solutions, and we have to go where we can get power and implement real solutions.  In October 2019 when everybody in America was being entertained by the teenage sex life of Supreme Court nominee, Brett Cavanaugh, the House, the Senate, and the White House, Democrat, Republican, both sides of the aisle got together and approved Statement 56 of the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, which said that they could keep secret books.  That was everybody.  Together.  So there is no right versus left.  There is no Trump versus Biden.  There is a machine, a spending machine, that is financed with our taxes, and debt borrowed in our name that is being sold into our pension funds and retirement accounts.  There is that machine, and that machine to keep balancing the books is implementing a depopulation plan.  That is the reality that has to be faced and changing the president won't matter.  Now, if you've got your head out of Washington, DC, and started to focus on your state legislators and local leaders, you could start to make progress protecting yourself against the machine.  If you want to make real progress against the machine, you've got to talk turkey about where your money is going, what it's doing, and who are local leaders in the state legislature who are going to support when this machine fails you which if it doesn't do it in 2023, it's going to do it in 2024.  So you better be ready.  You don't have any more time to worry about Trump or Biden.  

CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS: Vaccine passports are part of a financial transaction control grid that will absolutely end human liberty in the west.

western democracies where we have a balance of power between the bankers and the people.  The central bankers control monetary policy, and the people vote for an electorate that controls fiscal policy.   Now what we’re watching with COVID laws all around the world is that central bankers moving in and exercising essentially a coup de grace, where they take control of fiscal policy as well. 

Vaccine passports are about the control of money, not health. https://t.co/86eb060OPM

— Dr. Joseph Mercola (@mercola) November 15, 2021

This is not the first time in history that plague laws have been used to centralize control: control of transportation, control of labor, control of banking, and bank account.  Control of all the different kinds of capital that make up civilization. But the COVID laws are particularly draconian in the history of plague laws, because not only do they control labor, transportation, banking, but now with the advances in digital technology, we’re looking at complete control through the banking system through 100% of all assets ultimately.

So, what happens here?  So, for many, many years, most of us have grown up in a world in the western democracies where we have a balance of power between the bankers and the people.  The central bankers control monetary policy, and the people vote for an electorate that controls fiscal policy.   Now what we’re watching with COVID laws all around the world is that central bankers moving in and exercising essentially a coup de grace, where they take control of fiscal policy as well.  And again with the advances in digital technology, vaccine passports will not be about health.  Vaccine passports are part of a financial transaction control grid that will absolutely end human liberty in the west.  For many years, I have fought and written against central control of the financial system.  We’ve centralized more and more capital, more and more control.  And we’ve done it with tactics called “Divide and Conquer,” and we’ve all experienced many “Divide and Conquer” tactics: men against women, black against white, but now we have a new one: the vaccinated against the unvaccinated.  Because if you’re going to centralize every aspect of people’s lives, and literally strip them of their assets and property rights, you need a new, more venal “Divide and Conquer” and we can’t let that happen.