Showing posts with label Donald Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Donald Trump. Show all posts

Thursday, May 16, 2024

TRUMP, 2020: If forcing American taxpayers to provide unlimited free healthcare to illegal aliens sounds fair to you, then stand with the radical left.

130 legislators in this chamber have endorsed legislation that would bankrupt our nation by providing free taxpayer funded health care to millions of illegal aliens, forcing taxpayers to subsidize free care for anyone in the world who unlawfully crosses our borders.  These proposals would raid the Medicare benefits of our seniors and that our seniors depend on, while acting as a powerful lure for illegal immigration.  That is what is happening in California and in other states.  Their systems are totally out of control, costing taxpayers vast and unaffordable amounts of money. If forcing American taxpayers to provide unlimited free healthcare to illegal aliens sounds fair to you, then stand with the radical left.  But if you believe that we should defend American patients and American seniors, then stand with me and pass legislation to prohibit free government healthcare for illegal aliens. 

Friday, May 3, 2024

DONALD TRUMP CALLS FOR THE DEATH PENALTY FOR ANTISEMITIC ATTACKS

Well, that was fast.  Clint Russell's video was removed.  But X News Release has it up. 

In 2019, Trump signed an executive order to combat antisemitism, making clear that Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits the federal funding of universities and other institutions that engage in discrimination applies to institutions that "traffic in antisemitic hate."  

Friday, March 22, 2024

AG JAMES AT TRIAL: Mar-a-Lago is only valued at $18 million. AG JAMES AFTER TRIAL: Trump should pledge Mar-a-Lago to secure a $500,000,000 bond because it's worth at least twice that.

Sunday, March 17, 2024

ROBERT BARNES: Yeah, instead of grabbing pussies, he's become one

Take Boeing.  Do you know who Boeing implicates?  The person he's right now considering for Vice President.  Scott is neck-deep in Boeing.  The whole South Carolina political hierarchy--Nikki Haley, Lindsay Graham, they're all neck-deep in Boeing.  And Tim Scott especially.  Tim Scott has written special legislation just for Boeing.  My guess is that's why Trump is keeping his mouth shut.  Trump right now seems scared.  Scared to say things about the FBI, about the CIA, about the NSA, about the US Agriculture Department, about the FDA, about the CDC, about any of these people.  It's glaring when the other day you see Robert Kennedy talking about it, and Trump not day after day after day after day.  

Friday, February 23, 2024

"Trump could wind up seizing the state capitol, the governor’s residence, etc., plus having his property returned to him."

Thanks to Martin Armstrong's "NYC Bonds Are in Sell Mode."

COMMENT: Hi Martin, 

Thanks for the “astute lawyer” compliment. That was very nice, and coming from you, it is very meaningful to me. 

The Epoch Times headline in your “NYC Out of Control” post calls the dollar part of the verdict against the Trumps a “penalty.” It has also been called a “fine,” but I haven’t yet seen it called “damages” in a headline. I think Hochul, Engoron, and James know that the amount was based on a damage assessment and calculation that may not hold up.  

New York Executive Law § 63(12) clearly reads that the attorney general “may apply . . . for an order . . . directing restitution and damages…”. [Emphasis mine.] New York proved math calculations, not actual damages, where the damaged party had to be made whole. Had the statute recited a list of fines, they’d probably be in a more sound position, but their position now is what I would call “too dicey for comfort.” I would seize nothing in this situation because there are too many cases of improper seizures to worry about. The verdicts against those who seize property in error or improperly or hastily in a flawed or tainted case are many times larger than the amount of the money judgment used to seize and sell the property of the defendant. 

Furthermore, if New York has someone running the Trump businesses, and should he or she destroy or damage the businesses, the state could be liable for many, many times the amount of the verdict/judgment against the Trump family. Trump could wind up seizing the state capitol, the governor’s residence, etc., plus having his property returned to him. I’ve seen this happen. Once, the State of Louisiana overreached, and once, the U.S. government was a litigant against a billionaire oil man, banker, and friend who could not get the IRS to return his multi-million dollar overpayment of taxes. He finally had enough, and he seized the Hale Boggs Federal Court Building. He got his money a day later. 

Perhaps by dancing around exactly what legal principle the amount of the money verdict/judgment is based on (i.e., damages, fines, penalties [i.e., a payment imposed as punishment], whatever), the Hochul, Engoron, James enterprise has walked into a trap. The Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive fines. If they maintain the amount is absolutely based on the principle of damages, how can they show a diminution of the state being “whole” (or “wholeness” if you will) owing to Trump’s actions with third parties. If they maintain the amount of the verdict/judgment is based on a properly enacted and published fine or penalty, then they must face the Eighth Amendment. 

In my opinion, Hochul, Engoron, and James are whistling past the graveyard. They have put their careers on the line, and the dice are tumbling. 

Best regards, and thanks again. 
EGM

REPLY:

This is so political it smells, and just because this Judge, who is not qualified to judge a turtle race, simply decrees, they think they are God, and everyone must bow down to them and kiss their ring. It is so rare to find a decent judge in New York. Judge Lawrence McKenna saw what they were doing and tried to protect me. The government went to the Chief Judge to remove him and then sealed the record. 

The DA belongs in prison with the governor and this disgusting judge. This DA is bragging that she will now seize Trump Tower. When the computer projected that the 2024 election would be intermixed with serious civil unrest and that neither side would ever accept the outcome, as we draw closer and closer to this date with destiny, it is looking very, very dark indeed.

The computer is projecting a panic cycle in September, rising volatility in October, and October will be a critical turning point heading into the 2024 election. We should no longer have the motto Gold Bless America. It should be changed to God Save America These LEFTIST are destroying the very foundation of law; without that, civilization can no longer exist. That is the testimony of history – not my opinion. 

NEW YORK IS DOOMED 

Bond investors have piled into New York City’s tax-exempt bonds, lured by their relatively high yields. However, with a $7 billion budget deficit spiraling costs of sheltering asylum seekers and other migrants that have sought refuge in New York on top of this collapse in the rule of law, NYC is a sell – not a buy. Wall Street profits are declining, and with them, there are looming job cuts at major investment banks. Many are migrating to Florida, which puts pressure on city tax revenue. New York’s fiscal outlook is a disaster. That suggests the city’s general obligation bonds aren’t particularly attractive at current valuations – they are a sell. 

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

Hungarian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Pรฉter Szijjรกrtรณ: Peace has a name, and the improved U.S. Hungarian relations have a name as well. And this name is definitely President Donald Trump

Monday, January 29, 2024

As a candidate in 2016, Trump was good on vaccines. As president, not so much

Wakefield's points are alarming. 

Starts out with Trump making a comment during the 2016 presidential debates "Autism has become an epidemic."  But that comment seems to be more of a predictive programming remark for the 2020 pandemic rather than a critique of the vaccines causing autism.  

Andrew Buncombe was the US Editor of The Independent at the time of this interview where he asked Wakefield about his relationship with Trump.  

00:18. Wakefield is given the abominable label of "Disgraced doctor," a horrific lie, as he explains.  "I met him once before the election when he was running for the presidency I had a meeting at Kissimmee in Florida (on 08/11/2016) and we were there, three of us, four of us, representing the issue of autism and its link to immunization, and he interjected and said, "You don't need to tell me that vaccines cause autism.  I've seen it.  I've seen it personally." [Then Trump on tape].  

00:46. Trump: And we've had so many instances . . . people that work for me.  Just the other day, 2 years old, 2 1/2 years old, the child, a beautiful child, went to have the vaccine and came back a week later, got a tremendous fever, got very very sick, and now is autistic.

01:03. We went on to discuss the issue of the autism crisis in this country, which is set to affect one in two children by 2032, according to the CDC's own data.  If nothing is done, nothing changes, that's 80% of the boys in this country.  It's a national crisis, and that's what he wanted to discuss.  He said if he were to be elected, then he would do something about this.  My concern at this stage facing the prospect of one in two children in this country developing autism by 2032.  That is my major concern.

And what did President Donald Trump do to stem this trend?

Thursday, January 18, 2024

3:22. To get to the book to the heart of it Donald Trump is not a conservative in any way shape or form economically.

WOODS.  If I were to pick Trump out and say he's no good on these issues the whole Republican party is bad on these issues and even if you bring out a Paul Ryan well the difference between Paul Ryan and Trump is Ryan wants to hire commission to look at into it and then they'll ignore it with the commission said I don't think Trump is alone in this

4:30.  I agree with you and unfortunately, the Republican Party in the last half-decade has drifted further and further away from the fundamentals of fiscal rectitude but partly because it has been "Trumpified."  Trump insisted stoutly while he was in office for 4 years that they were going to touch Social Security that was a half-hearted effort and didn't pan out and no political capital was really spent, but since then he's become even more militant on insisting that those huge entitlements, the whole transfer payment budget, is sacrosanct.  If he is renominated and the Republican Party is led by Trump again for the next 4 years, I think it's all over except for the shouting.

5:34. Any voices in the party that might want to face these fiscal facts have been totally smothered.  You remember when they passed a huge CARES Act sight unseen in March 2020 after the lockdowns were proposed, it was 2.2 trillion dollars.  No one even read 180 pages.  The one guy who opposed it was the congressman from Kentucky, Thomas Massie.  He got denounced and shouted down by Trump and Trump even demanded that he be purged from the Republican Party so that's what we're up against but I agree with you without Trump we still have a real battle in front of us but at least there's some hope the Republican Party can come back to its senses.

6:32. Let's dig into some statistics.  The problem is that the Republican base doesn't seem to have much interest in this you know they say they do but I don't think they do.  For example, the TEA Party was a brief flash in the pan, but even they were willing to make the kinds of cuts that would be necessary.  I highly doubt it. It's easy to go after work leftist or ANTIFA criminals or whatever because everybody understands how crazy that is but people like getting checks in the mail with their names on them and that's a very very hard addiction to break.

7:26. I agree with you and the worst episode of that was the so-called Stimi's in response to the lockdown in which everyone got a check except maybe the top 10% of households up to $150,000 we're getting those steamy checks of $1,200, $1,400, 500 for the kids.  After that first act during the summer and fall of 2020, if you were a family of 4 with two wage earners and got laid off, you got all the stimmy checks in child care credits; you were all so eligible for the unemployment topper on top of which was a $1,000 a week; on top of the state benefits, it could add up to $30k, $40k, even $50,000 a year of handouts from the government.  That happened on Trump's watch he signed it it was the worst excess of that thing that we've encountered yet and it's another reason why I think he's already prove he's not even remotely the right person for the job.

8:50. So what you're doing in this book in part is going through the Trump record and arguing that it was not all it was cracked up to be in terms of economic performance.  . . . Even though the President doesn't really have that much control over monetary policy, the president does nominate someone for Fed chair, and I would like for  the president to be sensible enough to choose a decent enough Fed Chair.  I mean I'd be very very happy if Jim Grant were chosen to be Fed Chairman because maybe something might happen.  But no president has actually been serious about making the dollar worth something again and keep an eye on rising prices and really crack down, I don't know of anybody.  So are we being unfair to Trump?

10:10. I don't think we are because these subsequent presidents you don't like Reagan was a pretty stout Defender of what the said needed to do and what Volker was doing to bring down that double digit inflation we've inherited and the other Republican politicians around him in the white house and on Capitol Hill we're constantly pushing you've got to tell Volker to take his foot off the neck on the economy Howard baker said that but he really didn't yield and after Volker one he should have been reappointed in 1987.  Stockman convinced Reagan that volcker wasn't reliable and Alan Greenspan would make a wonderful replacement.  The presidents since then, the Bushes, have been lukewarm tap it on the monetary issue they didn't demand that the FED open up the spigot and print money like there was no tomorrow but they didn't demand a solid money or sound money policy either the problem is when Trump got in he leaned way the other way he was constantly on the case going after interest rates which were about zero effectively when he got there and the belated efforts of the FED tried to get interest rates moving back into some semblance of rationality he constantly thwarted and opposed now this is important in 2017 after we were well after the Great Recession sort of conservative/ Keynesian Friedman Heights that had dominated the Republican Party always believed that when you got into the middle and back into the business cycle to sober up should be to be to get back to Market rates of Interest to get the budget balanced even a surplus Trump went the other way when they tried as you remember to begin raising interest rates and then they went into QT in 2018 and 2019 Trump was all over the case of the Fed and blaming them you know for even trying to get interest rates within the range of something meaningful in real terms after inflation so that's why I think the indictment is so strong it came at the wrong time and it was really the wrong message utterly wrong as I say in the book I think he was more irresponsible Reckless on monetary policy then William Jennings Bryant you can't have someone back in the Oval Office who is going to be on the feds case to ease money to lower interest rates to buy in which is what he would do predictably if he gets a second term.

13:54. I am going to ask you later on a couple of good things about Trump.  He speaks as if there is no downside to lowering interest rates and of course we all like lower interest rates so the only obstacle is a lack of political will or dummies on the Federal Reserve board?  There like there are no economic consequences there is no meaning to interest rates they can just be arbitrarily set wherever we like.  Like you know he wouldn't even pause to wonder you know like, "I wonder it means if it seems . . . .  There's absolutely no reason not to do this, but there must be some, you know, I wonder what it is."

15:00.  It's obvious that a market sets interest rates it's what allocates capital it's what allocates economic activity if we've known for decades and decades and decades the price system is fundamental to capitals prosperity and if you don't have you know at least reasonably honest quasi market prices in the financial system we're going to end up with a mess we have today huge financial bubbles we're going to be sending the wrong message to Capitol Hill in other words the FED debt doesn't matter because the carry cost on the debt actually when the when the FED finally have the interest rates down to Rock Bottom average 1.6% well the politicians are going to worry about the cost of financing the debt and the carry cost of the debt if you drive the weighted average cost of the $34 trillion federal debt that's the problem is you know if you want to turn Wall Street into a speculative casino and if you want to turn Washington into a runaway spending machine, then artificially depressed interest rates to non-economic levels and I have a chart in the book which I think is worth bringing up if you take the period between the spring of 2008 right before the Great Recession and a year ago March 2022 when the FED finally reversed direction the real interest rate if you subtract the funds rate you subtract the year over year inflation from federal funds rate was negative 95.5% of the time in terms of months elapsed of the 183 months was negative over 170 months now that's crazy for that long of a period of time you were sending a signal to both Wall Street to speculate in the carry trades to your heart's content you were sending a message to the other end of the cell you can talk about the physical problem down the road but don't worry about it today or tomorrow or next year even because the carry cost is is rounding here

Tuesday, September 12, 2023

Putin dismisses the idea of Trump and Russia having "special ties," as Trump "imposed the greatest number of sanctions on Russia."

Putin is asked what his expectations are for Trump and the US election. He says it doesn't matter, as "there will be no fundamental change in US policy." He dismisses the idea of Trump and Russia having "special ties," as Trump "imposed the greatest number of sanctions on Russia."

Monday, May 15, 2023

ROBERT BARNES: Trump has to be one of the highest integrity people on the planet because to be a New York real estate tycoon, titan, and all they can find on you [are] some affairs?

I call it confession through projection, so if you look at all the crimes they accuse Trump of and it's pretty much what the Biden family HAS DONE.  --Robert Barnes

 

 
2:20. Americans are witnessing in live time how disparate and discriminatory unfortunately our American legal system has become.

7:35. How many american power players continued meeting with convicted sex offender, Jeffry Epstein, and pedophile after his conviction, including people like the CIA Director William Burns, who at that time was serving as Deputy Secretary of State.  And he had meetings scheduled with Epstein in his own private mansion.  And the same goes for Obama's presidential advisor, or for a college president.  What does it say for you about the informal ways of power and influence in America?  

8:15. In the post WWII era, the American deep state as it came to be known, some people call it the National Security establishment, or the Military Industrial Complex, really entrenched its power across the media, across the university spectrum, across our corporate institutions, across our global institutions.  As Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., recently said that he attributes to the CIA and those bad actors the assassination of both his father and his uncle, President John F. Kennedy.  And part of all that is always having honey traps, sex trafficking operations being involved, illicit operations around the world to extort, targeted individuals, and Jeffrey Epstein, not coincidentally, was connected to Robert Maxwell, the British publisher, who had connections to intelligence operations all over the globe.  He came from the Dalton School, where Epstein got his first break.  Secretary of State Anthony Blinken went to that  same school.  William Barr, the former Attorney General's father, was the Headmaster right before Epstein was hired at the Dalton School.  So you have an elite prep school tied to, had tie-ins.  You go deeper, you had Blinkin's father and Epstein.  So it's not a surprise that you had Epstein as the centerpiece for a honey-trap extortion operation, blackmail operation for intelligence agencies around the world.  He had ties to Robert Mueller . . . .  The reason he got a sweetheart deal is most likely he was a secret informant for the Fed, meaning the FBI, under Robert Mueller.  This goes back . . . Robert Mueller has ties to people who did operations similar to that out of San Francisco.  So it's not a surprise.  It's just American and global institutional power we don't get to see in live term, and I think this is what is coming out. 

10:10. Do i understand you correctly that all these parties that Epstein was involved in organizing involving teenage girls, or very young women, you believe it was not only for the sexual gratification of the participants, but possibly a scheme, a means for coopting for further control 

10:35. Oh, no doubt.  Classic blackmail extortion ring.  It's not only about providing illicit sexual services to an elite group of people who otherwise can't find that easily the access to that illicit activity but it's also to blackmail and extort them.  I don't think it's a coincidence . . . I think some of the efforts failed, like the effort to get . . . the material on Alan Dershowitz didn't ultimately work out because he didn't take the bait but, nor do I think Noam Chomsky who apparently met multiple times with him, I don't think he took the bait on any of that.  But most likely it was also because he was involved in eugenics and a lot of other weird science that Epstein . . . but I think the long-term goal and object in each one of these cases was to entrap and ensnare these people in a world that could then be used against them. According to media reports, there were lots of video cameras all over Epstein's Island.  We just don't know what happened to all of that material.  But all of it has the forensics fingerprints of a blackmail operation involving western intelligence agencies. 

11:35. I don't know if its accurate, but Trump's resort in Mar-a-Lago was absolutely off limits for Epstein's parties, and that raises a very interesting question about morality because it's one thing to pursue adult women, even as an extramarital affair but it's quite a different to buy the bodies and ravage the souls of teenage girls.  What do you think about that?  

12:03. Oh, yeah, so early on Epstein was reported as harassing some young women at Mar-a-Lago, so Trump banned him from Mar-a-Lago.  And you can find some articles where he kept hinting at Epstein issues.  I think there's the Vanity Fair piece that was very favorable to Epstein where Trump kept saying "Well, he has a reputation for very young girls," where he's trying to put out there what's going on.  So . . . they tried to connect Trump to Epstein. Ultimately, it was unsuccessful because Trump was one of the people who kept his distance from Epstein over many years once he found out what he was about.  So it reflect the sad nature of our intel system but the . . . Trump has to be one of the highest integrity people on the planet because to be a New York real estate tycoon, titan, and all they can find on you [are] some affairs?  

12:53. This is not just fascinating but it's totally . . . it's hard for somebody like myself to understand how the Democrats would be waxing poetic about all the crimes and moral character of Trump while seemingly knowing about what's going on in their own camp.  It's beyond comprehension. 

13:25. I call it confession through projection, so if you look at all the crimes they accuse Trump of and it's pretty much what the Biden family HAS DONE. So they accuse Trump of being engaged with various foreign corruption scams and now it's coming out that the Biden family was raking money from almost anybody around the world to line their pickets.  The Democrats accuse Trump of various sexual misconduct.  There's all kinds if allegations circulating Biden concerning that and concerning far worse conduct.  And so I think what you see is confession through projection.  

Friday, May 12, 2023

Where is her evidence? She couldn't remember the date. She couldn't remember a year even.


With lawfare, you can destroy people through the legal process AFTER you've destroyed them in the court of public opinion.  

You can destroy people through the verdict or the jury finding.

2:41  The interview with Anderson Cooper is 4 years old.

Where is her evidence?  She couldn't remember the date.  She couldn't remember a year even. 

The 9 jurors who deliberated for 3 hours before reaching their unanimous conclusion, did not find that Trump raped Carroll.  They agreed that he sexually abused her and that he defamed her when denied her story.  Carroll was awarded $5 million for both claims. 

"Found guilty" is not a phrase that you use in civil liability.

And don't forget who bankrolled E. Jean Carroll's lawsuit against Trump, the anti-Trump billionaire, Reid Hoffman.

In today's courts, you only need allegations, not evidence.

The verdict will harm actual victims. 
 
What I don't understand is why was E. Jean Carroll such a fan of Donald Trump and his show AFTER the alleged date of the rape?

Wednesday, December 21, 2022

You don't have any more time to worry about Trump or Biden. 

Hunter opens up with a Christmas greeting and then tries to console himself over the loss of his friend, CNN and ABC investigative reporter, Drew Griffin, who was a staple here on LA's ABC Eye Witness News on Channel 7 for years.  

Fitts has said that with so many people dying that there will be a glut of things in the market form people's deaths that it will have a deflationary effect on the economy.  People are going to see what's been done to them.  Are you seeing this unfolding now? 

Fitts references the Skidmore Survey from January 2022.  The survey showed that not only were there a significant number of adverse events--deaths and injuries--but there was a significant number of people who understood that it was coming from the injections.  The media has done a remarkably good job at painting a different picture, but at some point you can't defy reality.  So that's coming out and we're seeing it translate into market action.  So in one day we see the insurance companies trading down 30% and funerals trading up 20%, that's a 50% divergence.  So integrating into people lives and their health and in market reaction, it's hard to deny reality. The Doctors 4 COVID Ethics did their 5th symposium on December 19.  Sasha Latypova's "Intent to Do Harm" makes the compelling case that this was not a vaccine, not a pharmaceutical, not a medicine. She said it's a weapon.  The variability in the batches is far too great for it to be classified or described as a medicine or  pharmaceutical.  Of course, if you look at the damage it's caused you can only therefore describe as a weapon.  And she's very experienced.  I mean this is a pharmaceutical executive, somebody coming from the industry, and really knows the ins and outs, the definitions, and legal definitions, regulations, etc.  We're now staring down the barrel of a mass atrocity.  This is a mass atrocity.  This is a depopulation.  This is a genocide.  We're still struggling to find words to describe this.  If you look at the economic restrictions that introduced this it probably killed more people than the injections.  The deaths and injuries are more significant than popularly understood.

5:35. Hunter raises the question of finances. They're running our of money  They can't pay social security.  They can't pay the pensions.  Is this the motivation behind it? 

Something this big has more than one goal, multiple functions, called stacking functions  One, they do want to reset the financial system because we gave had a financial coup d'access to knowledge, and to dramatically increase their politicaltat. But there's something else.  If you look at the central banking warfare model that's run the west for centuries now, if you're the central bankers you cannot maintain control unless you use digital technology to go to complete control.  So digital technology gives the planet the ability for the general population to dramatically increase their learning speed, to dramatically increase their political and economic power unless the central bankers use it for central control.  So you're staring down a situation that is a prisoner's dilemma: you either assert complete control or you lose control.  And I think the central bankers have decided, and the question is why, for a variety of reasons, they're going to assert central control.  Thet have 10 to 20 years to do it and that's what they're moving to do.  They want to chip people like livestock, mind control them like live stock, and have complete control.  Thet don't want to brook any opposition.  And so they're implementing a control system.  It's no longer going to be a financial system.  It's going to be a straight out transaction control system.  And they're saying no freedom of transaction, no freedom of health choices, no freedom of anything.  We want complete control, and unfortunately it looks like that is coming with a form of slavery that is far worse, in my opinion, than historical forms of slavery because it's so physically invasive.  But, now, we're talking about significant depopulation. 

8:10. HUNTER.  Why do they think they can get away with this? 

8:13.  FITTS. One theory:  one scientist who I know and who I have great respect for believes that a lot of what's happened in the last 3 years was to sufficiently terrorize the population to go along with being injected, chipped, and controlled.  Terrorization as a form of marketing the control they want.  Part of this is to put people in fear.  Most important for 2023 is to get out of fear and stay out of fear.  That means being careful not to ingest a lit if TV and not ingesting a lit if mind-control technology.  The reason they think they can get away with it, Greg, is because they've gotten away with ir so far.  I've always said that the crime that pays is the crime that stays. And what we've watched since 1998 is an influential coup and that they've gotten away with it, and the more they get people to ingest massive amounts of propaganda, subliminal programming, all the mind-control tricks.  Now they know that can't last forever, which is why they're talking about putting a chip in you or a neural link in your head all these crazy things.  That's to assert complete control even when you disagree with them.  They can shut down your disagreement. 

Trump put $10 billion dollars into a program Operation Warp Speed to depopulate Americans.  

It takes 10-12 tears to test out a vaccine to make sure it's safe.  

If there was one person in political life who knew how dangerous vaccines are it was Donald Trump. This was a big issue during the campaign expressing his concerns about the vaccines, so he knows.

Trump put Moncef Slaoui in charge of Operation Warp Speed, who was head of research at a pharmaceutical company, GSK, and his expertise was on brain-machine interface.  

I will give Trump credit:  he pulled us out of the W.H.O. and the Paris Climate Accord

Current most dangerous thing is the new treaty from the W.H.O.  They're saying that a 2/3rds vote of the Senate is not required because it's not a change in treaty.  But it is.  It's a new treaty.  Find a template letter at Solari that you can send to your representatives and say you get us out of the W.H.O. and you stop funding the W.H.O. or we're going to be completely stripped of our national sovereignty.  If you go into the W.H.O., you're turning the U.S. into a country who is going to kill you.  

13:00. GREG HUNTER. Is there anyway for Trump to redeem himself?  

13:30, FITTS. I don't know.  If I were in Trump's shoes, I'd say "I made a mistake.  I'm sorry.  And here's what we need to do next year.  But I don't know how you come back from this. L

HUNTER. Karen Kingston was on his True Social, and she got banned, talking about how SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon.  It is.  

14:10. FITTS. You can say Trump was on board for a depopulation or Trump got rolled.  Either one is not a case to be made that he ought to be president.  Then he's incompetent.  You've got to hold people accountable.  You've got to tell the truth and you've got to hold people accountable.  That's the only way out of this.  

15:40. FITTS. Every quarter while Trump was president, we did a report card on Trump. It varied.  Great job of getting us out of Paris Climate Accord, getting us out of the W.H.O. to areas where he's doing a terrible job. On the financial coup, Ferrell gave him a . . . I was giving him F's, and Ferrell went down the alphabet giving him a Z.  Trump was a mixed bag.

16:20. FITTS. The president is not running things.  The president is not in charge.  What happened in November 1963?  The U.S. intelligence agencies, military establishment got together and killed the president.  And who controls the Secret Service?  It's the Secretary of the Treasury [today that's Janet Yellen] and the people who run the country.  So the Deep State controls the Secret Service, and there are guns pointing out and there are guns pointing in.  In a highly centralized system, the president has very little power.  Red Button story.  It says everybody in America wants their check.  And the way to get your check is to borrow more money and to print more money.  And so you've had a lit of popular support for the financial coup. And the reason is everybody wants their check.  Put the president in charge.  Hit the population with massive amounts of propaganda and disinformation.  Suddenly, they're screaming they want a vaccine. 

In 2020, the president rolled out the vaccine program that would kill and injure millions of American people.  So he has two reasons for doing it: he's either incompetent or he's breaking the law.  I know what I knew.  I know what I hold him responsible to know and I know what he did.  I know what I would have done: I would have taken a bullet in the head before I implement culling of the American population. 

19:12.  We're talking around in a box where there are no solutions, and we have to go where we can get power and implement real solutions.  In October 2019 when everybody in America was being entertained by the teenage sex life of Supreme Court nominee, Brett Cavanaugh, the House, the Senate, and the White House, Democrat, Republican, both sides of the aisle got together and approved Statement 56 of the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, which said that they could keep secret books.  That was everybody.  Together.  So there is no right versus left.  There is no Trump versus Biden.  There is a machine, a spending machine, that is financed with our taxes, and debt borrowed in our name that is being sold into our pension funds and retirement accounts.  There is that machine, and that machine to keep balancing the books is implementing a depopulation plan.  That is the reality that has to be faced and changing the president won't matter.  Now, if you've got your head out of Washington, DC, and started to focus on your state legislators and local leaders, you could start to make progress protecting yourself against the machine.  If you want to make real progress against the machine, you've got to talk turkey about where your money is going, what it's doing, and who are local leaders in the state legislature who are going to support when this machine fails you which if it doesn't do it in 2023, it's going to do it in 2024.  So you better be ready.  You don't have any more time to worry about Trump or Biden.  

Monday, May 2, 2022

"ironically there seems to be ONLY one statesmen still standing and that is Donald Trump"


Russia TV called out Borris Johnson for threatening to launch nuclear weapons against Russia. As they aptly warned that Borris has simply lost his mind that the UK is a very small island and one long-range nuclear weapon will wipe out the UK from the face of the planet. They also point out that they can simply detonate one offshore that would create a tsunami that would also wipe out the UK. 

As one reader pointed out, strategic nukes and tactical nukes are different in classical terms of “strategy” and “tactics”. The long-range strategic nukes are long-range (ICBMs, SLBMs, BTW launched, etc.) and generally used for a large-scale assault, whereas tactical nukes are short-range (smaller artillery-launched) and less powerful (relatively speaking, of course). Russia could use a tactical nuke and wipe out Kyiv without destroying the entire country. That would at least shut up Zelensky and he will never get to spend the $850 million he has already allegedly stolen post-war with the blood of his own people to keep the money flowing which he is stuffing offshore in the traditional fashion of Ukrainian politicians. In the US, they go in broke and leave as millionaires. In Ukraine, they strive to live as billionaires.

Russia is correct that just one nuke would wipe out Britain and Scotland. Just what the hell is going on here with these brain-dead leaders in the West is unimaginable. I spoke with a Congressman this morning and the sad state of affairs was that I was told that there is little expertise on Capitol Hill for the cold war generation seems to have retired. That is not helped when we have a senile President who seems to be rambling and will simply sign whatever they stick in front of him and needs the Easter Bunny to direct him and turn to shake hands with people who are not there.

Nobody wants to discuss the fact that Kyiv sent its army to begin the Civil War against Donbas on April 15th, 2014. It was called the “Anti-terrorist operation.” I have stated that I have personally known people on both sides from Kyiv and Donetsk. I have listened to the sheer hatred of Russians that stems from the days of Stalin who killed 7 million Ukrainians by starvation (see the film Mr. Jones). Understandably, Ukrainians would hate Russians and that includes those in the Donbas. Likewise, the ethnic Russians in the Donbas feel oppressed and hated based entirely on their ethnicity. But the Western Neocons just hate Russians so their story of Donbas is never told in the Western press.

As I have pointed out, Russian scholars have been debating this issue for decades trying to answer the questions (1) who is Russian and (2) what is the territory of Russia. Stalin was not Russia – he was Georgian. Lenin wanted to maintain the USSR and the Russian Empire with each state retaining its sovereignty. Stalin disagreed and demanded USSR be one country and terminated Lenin’s idea of a quasi-United States of Russia


Nikolai Patrushev is much more hard-right than Putin.

Putin has cancer and he is undergoing surgery. His number 2 is Nikolai Patrushev who is much more hard-right than Putin. I am deeply concerned that Putin may not make it to 2024 and if that is the case, these insults the West keeps hurling at Russia have not only severed all relations but also the direct phone line set up after the Cuban Missile Crisis to ensure that the leaders could always communicate to avoid war. Biden has virtually thrown the phone out the window.

Despite all the propaganda that demonizes Putin, those behind him are FAR WORSE for they are no different than the Neocons in America who just cannot sleep at night as long as Americans are still breathing. Our war cycle post-2024 appears to be the worst period. I fear that Putin will no longer be in charge and then we will see the real rage of Russia and how it has been treated by Biden and Europe. Russia will celebrate defeating the German Nazis on May 9th.

As Glen Greenwald pointed out on Twitter, “Noam Chomsky, in an interview this week, says “fortunately” there is “one Western statesman of stature” who is pushing for a diplomatic solution to the war in Ukraine rather than looking for ways to fuel and prolong it. “His name is Donald J. Trump,” Chomsky says. ” Indeed, in my discussions, ironically there seems to be ONLY one statesman still standing and that is Donald Trump. All we have a war-mongers cheering on World War III. Not a single world leader is interested whatsoever in world peace. They have all deliberately lied about what the Ukrainians have been doing against the ethnic Russians for they have killed over 6,000 civilians in this relentless war. Nobody can now stand up and even acknowledge that Putin was not lying or that he was even the slightest bit correct. Nobody will talk about Zelensky and how he has now polarized the Middle East as well as fueled the old hatred against the Jews. If you have not noticed, the countries surrounding Israel are aligning with Russia, not the USA and the EU.

Friday, October 22, 2021

Trump Took a Cool $1 Million from Pfizer

I reported on this back on August 24, 2021.

 

Thanks to Ginny Garner @ LewRockwel.com

Remember the days when Donald Trump was anti-vaccine?  What happened?  

He got bought off.  Pfizer paid him one million dollars.  At the 7:20 mark in the video, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. explains. 

Pfizer made a million-dollar contribution to Trump's inaugural.  And then Trump comes in and we continue to have meeting with Fauci, that he'd set up and was part of this process and we're rolling to get this thing started . . . 

For his inaugural?  So that's 2017, a full three years prior to the 2020 COVID scare and lockdown.  Pray tell, what could that money be for?  Hush money?  A cool million to support any vaccine campaign that Pfizer runs.

Here he is telling folks in Alabama to get the COVID-19 vaccine.  And why are there only a handful or fewer vaccine manufacturers providing the drug?  

But back to Trump, why is he pushing drugs?  A far cry from Nancy Reagan, eh?    

Why?  Is the jab THE ONLY cure for COVID?  Is it any kind of cure at all for COVID?  Doesn't look that way. 

Based on the evidence, it is no cure; in fact, it is a poisonous and monstrous cure that kills more people than it saves.