LIAM DEBOER: This is the feminine conflict mode operating through bureaucracy. The result is societies that cannot handle direct confrontation because every dispute immediately gets routed through institutional mediation.

every dispute immediately gets routed through institutional mediation. We've lost the capacity for what de Waal observed in male chimpanzee interactions.  Direct conflict, clear resolution, and then rapid reconciliation. Instead we get proxy conflicts that never truly resolve because the underlying tensions are never directly confronted.  --Liam DeBoer

https://t.co/69BwFlnfKa

— Mike Walgenbach (@Walgenbach82743) September 4, 2026

We were told that a more feminized society would result in less conflict.  But reality has determined that a lie.  

Frans de Waal, 1948-2024, spent decades studying chimpanzees social dynamics at Arnhem Zoo and discovered something that revolutionized our understanding of primate politics.  Most conflicts aren't initiated by the strongest males.  They're orchestrated by females who recruit others to do the actual combat.  The pattern is observable.  A female approaches a male screaming and gesturing in the direction of her opponent until she's aroused him to such a pitch that he launches a furious attack on the other animal.  The instigator herself never directly participates in the ensuing fight.  This pattern of behavior is our new normal.  

The sequence is always the same: 

1) Identification of Target, 

2) Signal of Distress, 

3) Recruitment of enforcement, then 

4) Withdrawal during consequences.  

The instigator is the most influential player in the entire drama but she never lifts a hand.  The fighting happens through proxy.  

Now look at every feminized Institution in Western societies and watch how conflicts unfold. University bias reporting where students identify "harmful" content, file a complaint, then withdraw while administrative process investigates and punishes.  Corporate HR systems where an employee signals distress about workplace behavior, appeals to HR, then steps back while investigation proceeds through company policy.  Social media moderation, where users flag offensive content, appeal to platform authorities, then withdraw while algorithmic review systems determine violations and deliver consequences.  The pattern is identical across all domains: Identify Target, signal distress, appeal to Authority, withdraw while the system delivers consequences.  This is the feminine conflict mode operating through bureaucracy.  We haven't gotten rid of conflict, we've simply delegated it.  

We are creating systems that amplify female initiated coalition behavior at civilizational scale.  The result is societies that cannot handle direct confrontation because every dispute immediately gets routed through institutional mediation. We've lost the capacity for what de Waal observed in male chimpanzee interactions.  Direct conflict, clear resolution, and then rapid reconciliation. Instead we get proxy conflicts that never truly resolve because the underlying tensions are never directly confronted. The promise was that feminization would reduce violence and create more Cooperative societies.  Instead, we got surveillance states where disagreement becomes a compliance issue routed through bureaucratic systems that monitor and punish rather than resolve. What de Waal observed in a zoo enclosure we've made the organizing principle of Western Civilization: the scream, the point, the appeal to Authority, the withdrawal, while others handle enforcement.  The only difference is scale, and scale is everything. 

Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex Among Apes, Frans de Waal, 1982.

This was entertaining.