Tuesday, April 15, 2025

PAUL SALADINO: Switch out the morning coffee for bone broth

Monday, April 14, 2025

The origin of vitamins and how they are made

DR. SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: Measles has been used for years in fighting cancer?

Here is the article, "Measles Virus as an Oncolytic Immunotherapy," Christine E. Engeland and Guy Ungerechts, Cancers (Basel), February 1, 2021

Incredible.  

Measles virus is currently under investigation as an innovative cancer treatment. The virus selectively replicates in and kills cancer cells. Furthermore, it can be genetically engineered to increase tumor specificity and therapeutic efficacy. Importantly, treatment with measles virus activates antitumor immune responses. A number of clinical trials using measles virus for cancer treatment have been completed or are ongoing. Future studies will further harness the possibilities of virus engineering and potential of combination immunotherapies to improve clinical outcome.

CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS: If you want to do a land grab, having a recession lowers your prices

ROD D. MARTIN: President Trump just militarized the “Roosevelt Reservation” along the US border in CA, AZ, and NM

Hard to know what this means, but any institution can repurpose any event, any installation, any monument. 

BRETT PIKE: The [1934 American Historical Association] report was used to pivot away from prioritizing traditional American values be taught in school. Instead, promoting collectivism over individualism, and globalism over nationalism.

American Historical Association, 1934.  

How long has the American education system been dumbing us down? Well in 1934 the American Historical Association released a report funded by the Carnegie Corporation.… The report was used to pivot away from prioritizing traditional American values be taught in school. Instead, promoting collectivism over individualism, and globalism over nationalism. There is a reason 3.7 million people are homeschooling.

LUKE DAVID JOHNSON: [Trump's tariffs] are meant to protect American industry. They are meant to protect Americans from their corporations, who will sell them out for a profit

Buy direct from China. 

Chinese producers are all over social media right now, and they are exposing just who is targeted by Trump's tariffs.  And it's not the American consumers and it's not the Chinese producers.  It's actually our international corporations who have sold out American prosperity for their own profits.  Let me illustrate.  Let's use this example of Nike.  Now these are fictitious  numbers just for example.  But let's say that Nike buys shoes from this company that manufactures Nike shoes for $10 a Nike shoe, which isn't very far off.  Nike turns around and sells that shoe at retail for $100.  Here's the interesting part about tariffs.  You're not paying tariffs on the retail price.  This is not a tax in a classic sense.  The way the economists, who are bought and paid for, are trying to conflate it as it as a tax on the import.  This means with a 25% tariff, Nike is going to have to pay $2.50 to the US government every time it imports a Nike shoe at $10.  This $2.50 gets remitted to the American government and to American citizens.  Now Nike's cost is $10 for the shoe $2.50 for the import tax.  This means they are netting $87 per shoe.  Now that's net, not profit.  There are going to be other costs they're going to have to come from that.  But you can see that the increase in cost is $2.50.  So let's say that Nike passes the entire cost on to the consumer, even a little more just because of the fear of tariffs, $103 per shoe now.  That is the impact of a 25% tariff.  So what the Chinese producers on TikTok are saying, "Instead of the American consumer buying it for $103, or let's just say that the company, Nike eats all $2.50 of the tariff and still sells it for $100, you're way better off over here, paying directly to China, including the tariff, $12.50 a shoe plus shipping."

So as you can see, the tariffs are not meant to hurt consumers.  They're not meant to hurt China; they don't really affect China at all.  They are meant to protect American industry.  They are meant to protect Americans from their corporations, who will sell them out for a profit.  So if you look hard, you'll notice that the people who are screaming about how bad tariffs are for consumers, it's these companies right here.  It's Wall Street.  It's all the investors in these companies because they don't want American citizens to realize that these companies have sold them out and that they're not doing Americans any favors. 

BUY DIRECT FROM CHINA

A MESSAGE FROM CRISPY GNOME

PAUL BUITINK: I talked to Tom Luongo @TFL1728 again. He thinks Trump is on the right path, even though it's a dangerous strategy. Europe is the real enemy here says Tom.

BRETT PIKE: James F. Sensenbrenner authored both the 2005 Real ID Act and the 2001 PATRIOT Act

James F. Sensenbrenner, author of the Real ID Act 2005, the same guy that authored the PATRIOT Act in 2001.  At the time, we were told it was to keep us safe from "Middle Eastern [Jewish?] terrorists.  What it really did was expand the government's ability to spy, access emails, track financial records, and, most importantly of all, expand the definition of "domestic terrorism."  After January 6th, guess who the terrorist was?  It was you.  And now the government wants to create a domestic passport with real ID, and they're saying "Don't worry.  It's just for flying."  What they don't want you to know is that Democratic lawmakers have already attempted to require real ID to be shown for the purchase of firearms.  The threat of any legislation is always is potential for expansion.  Remember you are the terrorist now.  In fact, real ID will be required to enter Federal buildings and I wonder if that means that the J6ers would have been charged with additional crimes for not having one?  In George Washington's farewell, 1796, address, he warned against a false patriotism being used against the American people.  But that message was lost in 2001. Don't get lost now.

Sunday, April 13, 2025

Prior to 1913, the American people had direct veto power against spending policies of the federal government because in order for the federal government to borrow any money it had to go to the people.

Prior to 1913, the American people had direct veto power against spending policies of the federal government because in order for the federal government to borrow any money it had to go to the people.  There was no Central Bank it could go to.  It had to sell bonds.  If you didn't want to go to war, you didn't buy the bonds.  If you didn't want this pork project that the government had in mind, you didn't buy the bonds.  It was a very simple system, a Republican system, whereby you had veto power, economic veto power.  And it worked very well until 1913.  That's how come government managed to stay small because it didn't have an unlimited credit line to go on a shopping spree for 80 years and make you pay for it.  So in 1913, there was this convenient new arrangement made.  The Federal Reserve Act created an unlimited credit line for the Federal United States government to borrow directly from the Federal Reserve Bank and obligated the American people to pay it back, completely bypassing what was our veto power, and they no longer had to come to us directly to ask permission to fund something.  They went directly to the bank. 

HEALTH RANGER, MIKE ADAMS: You are living under satanic rule, characterized by ritualistic child sacrifice that's always called "health" or "medicine" or "peace."

VALERI ANNE SMITH: Before the actual trial starts, the participants are put on the drug for 6 weeks & then EXCLUDED from the trial if they have side effects from the drug! It Is Legal To Remove People Who Are Harmed & Not Report It.

Joe Rogan Is Shocked To Learn How Drug Trials Really Work... Before the actual trial starts, the participants are put on the drug for 6 weeks & then EXCLUDED from the trial if they have side effects from the drug! It Is Legal To Remove People Who Are Harmed & Not Report It. Pre-Randomization Run In Period: Before the actual trial starts, the participants are put on the drug for 6 weeks & then EXCLUDED from the trial if they have side effects from the drug! Clinical trials are structured to minimize the harms of the drug & show ONLY the results they want, in order to get FDA approval. This skews the entire end result of the trial data to only include participants who experienced no negative side effects from the drug. The act of excluding a large group of people from clinical trials after they have taken the drug for several weeks is not only legal, but it is an accepted practice. This results in study data that grossly underestimates the actual rate of side effects associated with statins. This explains why the rate of side effects in statin trials is wildly different from the rate of side effects seen in real-world experiences by patients. In The Heart Protection Study, 36,000 participants were removed during the "pre-randomization run-in period," before the actual clinical trial began. Participants took 40mg of Simvastatin daily for 6 weeks & then were removed from participating in the actual clinical trial. Unacceptable side effects were experienced by these 36,000 individuals. It is legal to label this in the trial data as "participant non-compliance." In a clinical trial, a participant is labeled "non-compliant" when they experience adverse drug side effects that they deem too harmful to their health. Since they cannot continue taking the trial drug, they are kicked out of the actual trial, for not continuing the drug dose protocol rules. 👇Statin Wars: Real Evidence Of Harm👇 bjsm.bmj.com/content/bjspor 👇Adverse Events Reported As Non-Compliance👇 pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC88 Speakers: Cardiologist

Joe Rogan Experience 

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS. USE YOUR RIGHTS. THIS IS HOW YOU DEFEND WHAT'S YOURS

Thank you to Martin Armstrong @ Armstrong Economics for "Martin Armstrong Reveals Insider Intel on Trump Tariff War."

3:00.  Europe is probably the worst of all.  It's mainly the French who are probably the most hostile to anything.  What we were all taught in school was propaganda from the 30s.  If you look at the facts, after World War I, Europe had basically blown its economy out of the water.  It was the place where all the sugar production and refining and all that was taking place.  The British pound was the financial center of the world.  It was the reserve currency, so they just blew themselves out of the water. So to try and recover, they put on excessively high tariffs after World War I, all before 1929.  Sugar production, for example, had fled Europe and went to the Caribbean.  Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, 1930, only came out in 1930, a year after the crash, right.  So, no serious economist that I ever saw blamed the tariffs for the Great Depression.  That was all the Democrats during the 1932 election, just a fake rhetoric, you know, blaming Smoot-Hawely because they were two Republicans, and the tariffs were really on agricultural products.  So that has hung over because FDR was using that, but, you know, look, the tariffs didn't prevent the Great Depression and they didn't cause it.  It's as simple as that.  What Trump has done, a 10% tariff, is a legitimate tariff.  When you're talking about putting 20%, or 30%, whatever, that is a political tariff.  That's the force negotiation; it's not realistic.  And, so all these people freaking out saying it's crazy by the press.  One of our readers I thought put it very well.  He said, "If Kamala had won and this happened, they would be blaming the Republican capitalist for trying to make her look bad," which is exactly what they're doing.  You have Bloomberg coming out and saying "Oh, the NASDAQ is in a bear market, the S&P is soon to follow."  It didn't even take out the uptrend line.  I mean what is this?  The fake news is going all the way into financial now?  Crazy, but they have created the crash and got everybody scared to hell.  Our computer had projected actually April 7th as the target for the low well in advance.  And we had said, look, there's going to be a short-term correction, then it'll turn back up.  It was just tim[ing], that's all, like I said before.  You can raise your hand in the air, no problem, but keep it there and eventually it gets very tired and it falls back down.  That's what markets do. They run out of energy.  I've said before.  I was in Tokyo and this one guy bribed to get into one of our institutional sessions.  He apologized and said, "I just had to talk to you."  I said what was so urgent?  He had bought $50 million dollars the very day of the high of the Japanese stock market, but what I found interesting was it was the first time he ever entered the market, and I asked him, "Why did you do this?"  And he said, for 7 years, brokers had called him, and said the Nikki goes up 5% every January.  And he watched it, and they were correct.  So he tried it in December, 1989.  So when you have suckered in the very last possible guy to buy, you're running out of energy.  That's your arm standing straight in the air and you can't keep it up anymore.  Who's going to buy?  Everybody's long.  That's what creates the crash because anybody that's been a serious trader gets into these incidents and everybody's trying to sell.  And you call the broker, "Where is the bid?"  There's no bid.  That's when it goes down a thousand points because everybody's scared. 

Saturday, April 12, 2025

SASHA LATYPOVA: The double helix was a sketch made by Crick's wife. There is nothing "real" about any of this. That's why despite billions plowed in "genetic" research nothing useful came of it.

Sasha Latypova, 

DNA is a mathematical model of a SALT of DNA (not at all the same as the theoretical DNA). The double helix was a sketch made by Crick's wife. There is nothing "real" about any of this. That's why despite billions plowed in "genetic" research nothing useful came of it. They can't even tell you apart from your dog in a blind DNA test.

ALEX KRAINER: It's always been China, China, China, then Mexico, Mexico, Mexico, and then it turns out that they busted the largest-ever fentanyl lab in Canada

24:55.  You're not shaking our companies down for fines and use that money to screw with our elections get get asked over that that's what this is about and then you're going to ship fentanyl under the country and kill our people no absolutely not this is over and I don't care what these people think because we are losing 100,000 people a year to fentanyl, which is more than we lost in the Vietnam War, and it's more than we lost per year in World War 2. Enough is enough is enough.  And it's not about money, or it's not about "Was this good economic policy?"  Screw you!  You're killing our people.  This Is war, and I think everybody needs to wrap their heads around this.  So sorry you pay 125% tariffs to bring goods into our country.  That's the best we can do right now, or you can negotiate.  And the people who are most buckered over this are not the Chinese, it's the European Union.  And the City of London because they feel they have the right, the hereditary right, to run the world's economy and to run these stupid currency arbitrage plays on everyone all day, and every day, and just sucking, arrogate all the wealth up to them.  No.  We're done.  Remember this is happening 12 days after the end of synthetic Library where there's no more passing fake LIBOR, zero collateral contracts, and liquidity around the European banking system. Now you've got to go to the US Banks or the FED to get real dollars and you got to post bankers service to do it. And you don't have any dollars.  So what are they doing?  Dumping our treasuries.  

It's always been China, China, China, then Mexico, Mexico, Mexico, and then it turns out that they busted the largest-ever fentanyl lab in Canada.  They suspected that there are many more like it . . . in Canada.

You remember the thing called the Opium Wars?  Who has perfected the opium wars as a tool of foreign policy?  Well, that would be the British, isn't it?  And then who does the most essential service to make the Opium Wars even possible? Well, that would be the City of London banks, like HSBC.  Israel has been the project of the City of London.  It has not been created there for the homeland of the long-suffering Jews.  It's been created there to cynically to exploit the Jews to create the unsinkable aircraft carrier and the factor of destabilization for the whole region.  In its history, Israel has fought 19 major military conflicts against their neighbors.  It has been the tool of enabling Western hegemony in the Middle East in order to enable Western powers to benefit from the vast natural resources from the region to their benefit. 

ATTY BOBBIE ANNE COX: Cuomo & the Dems who run NYS bought 247,000 pieces of "medical equipment" during C. It cost us taxpayers $452 Million.

RON PAUL: [The Real ID Act] contains no limits on the government’s power to impose additional standards. Indeed, it gives authority to the Secretary of Homeland Security to unilaterally add requirements as he sees fit.

So, like the PATRIOT Act? 

Dear MAGA, are you still in love with your libertarian-leaning, antisemitic president? 

Overcoming the Lies of American Medicine


14:15  I talked about cloud-busters and Wilhelm Reich's work and how people can put copper pipes in their backyard and they can clear up the skies.  And it's interesting.  But like you said, they put up this bill and it's got this blanket information, but then it's also got this little clause about vaccines, cell phone towers, and all of those little clauses in there.  And like you said, the PREP Act, or even the PATRIOT Act, because I was actually going back into that one, I found out that the PATRIOT Act had a small, little clause in there that is a person got vaccine damage by mercury and developed autism, they can't sue.  That was in the PATRIOT Act, 2001.  So you see how they sneak little things into these bills that make it seem like this is going on, but or like you said, looking for donations.  "Hey, we need $100."

Real Clear Skies.  



SASHA LATYPOVA: Intelligence is given to us for seeking the truth, saying true things, making corrections if mistaken, and acting truthfully ALL THE TIME.

Loved this from Latypova,

I admit, I get triggered when liars are called intelligent. While it takes some intelligence to concoct lies, these people are really dumb. Whatever intelligence is given to them, like the swine with pearls, they destroy God’s gift by trashing its divine purpose. Intelligence is given to us for seeking the truth, saying true things, making corrections if mistaken, and acting truthfully ALL THE TIME. People who lie, even once, are using the finest and the most powerful instrument in the entire Creation as a doorstop.

 

JOHN BEAUDOIN: How are [Massachusetts General Hospital] using so many specialty drugs in just 5 years? What is the incentive, or was the incentive the reason why they're using so many?

NIAID, biggest entity under NIH. 

Jeffry Morris of the University of Pennsylvania was all over Twitter defending the vaccines was basically an agent claiming that, no, he doesn't have any stock in pharma.  U of Penn is one of the largest recipients of grant funding.  He was lying the entire time.  He's still a professor there.  So you go to Mass General Hospital is 7th in funding.  At the bottom of this sheet, you see Mass. General Brigham.  They're listed separately, but if you add them up, it's $1.12 billion and it blows  Johns Hopkins.  It's by far the biggest grant-funded institution in the world, the National Institutes of Health,

Mass General Brigham had a 47.1% growth in revenue.  Where'd they get the extra $6.6 billion in 5 years? This doesn't happen in a growth industry, except for maybe cell phones in the 1990s.  Oh, they had a 47% growth rate.  Yeah, because they're getting them cheap, and everybody's getting them.  That's not healthcare.  This is all funny money from the federal government.  I don't really care about profit and loss, because they're a non-profit and they just move money around to either make money or lose money that year or the year after.  But because they're a non-profit, they have to balance the books.  But the research and academic money in that thin column right there, it's a 41% growth over 5 years, 2.06 to 2.9, we're looking at 2.9 billion dollars in research and academic money coming into Mass. General Brigham.

And then Medicaid: 65% growth in Medicaid income that they're receiving from 2019 to 2024.  $781 million grew to $2.9 billion.  And then Medicare: $2.9 billion up to $4.11 billion.   

Here's an interesting one.  Massachusetts Managed Care.  So before there was Obamacare, there was Romneycare.  That was our governor.  Sorry, United States, but where do you think Obamacare came from?  It was Massachusetts.  They make all this stuff.  So that plan cost the state, cost the taxpayers, $4.7 billion.  Sorry, we paid Mass General Brigham, we paid, the taxpayers of Massachusetts Mass General Brigham $4.71 billion in 2024.  Their total revenue is $20 billion.  They're getting $4 billion from Mass, almost $5 billion.  $4 billion from Medicare.  $1.3 billion from Medicaid.  $2.9 billion from research grants and stuff like that.  Is this a hospital?  I don't even know what I'm looking at here.  This is the government.  We're looking at a government, a state actor.  $4.28 billion, oh, it's NIH funding, so 43% growth over 5 years, and then it went from $1 billion to 4.55 billion. 

Now, let's look at the big one, way over to the right, "Specialty & Retail Pharmacy Operations" at a hospital.  They did $179 million in 2019, and it was $228 million in 2020 but think about COVID.  COVID came in in March, and the fiscal years we're looking at are September 30 end.  So any time you're looking at year it's ended September 30 fiscal year.  So COVID was only around for 6 months, basically one wave in 2020 in that one number that's $228 million.  It's still phenomenal growth.  You're still looking at . . . I don't want to run the numbers in my head here.  It's 60% to 70% growth, I have no idea.  But you look at 576% up to $1.2 billion in 2024.  You gotta ask, "What's going on?"  How are they using so many specialty drugs in just 5 years?  What is the incentive, or was the incentive the reason why they're using so many?  If you incentivize something, you will get more of it.  Walter E. Williams.  I loved that guy.  Yeah, we lost him during COVID too. 

Warren Buffett literally gave a free 1-hour masterclass on business and investing

America This Week Monday Night Livestream by Matt Taibbi

A recording from Matt Taibbi's live video

Read on Substack

Walter Kirn books

8:35. I covered Wall Street for 10 years and I didn't know about the disparity you know of the auto tariffs between Europe and the United States there's a lot of idiosyncratic knowledge that we need to understand before we can make a decision about whether this is a good thing or a bad thing but everybody instantaneously jumped on this idea that oh my God the stock market is going down and we are headed towards catastrophe and it did indeed look that way for a while today and then Mark it shot back up . . .

9:09.  . . . over a rumor that Trump had decided to pause the tariffs for 90 days, and, if I'm correct, the market went up like a thousand points in moments, proving, I think, that individual investors or even regular investors weren't behind the sound mixing board, but massive computer programs.  And you thought if we just did this structural thing that is going to bring down the world economy and a pause of 90 days suddenly reverses the whole market, then what are we really looking at was some kind of mass psychological event rather than some deep descent into trade war and nationalistic isolationism and so on they they made the stock market and it's performance of a proxy for Donald Trump's effectiveness and now they are wed to that formula: should it go up, should it end up? I guess he saved the world if he was going to destroy the world when it went down, it was the most panicky embrace of a short-term rhetorical advantage that I've ever seen in return for a long-term unmasking of your values.

11:00. Having covered 2008 and the collapse of the stock market, yes, it was very bad for Wall Street, but it massively impacted ordinary people . . .

11:12.  What massively impacted ordinary people was that they were leveraged to the hilt on their houses . . . 

11:19.  No, but they got killed three times: they got killed on their houses, they got killed because their retirement funds were heavily invested in mortgage-backed securities, and it got killed because of their taxes.  They had to pay taxes to bail out the people who did the crime, right? If the stock market crashes, it's because it will likely be because of a huge galaxy of underlying structural weaknesses in the market that are partly the fault of this Administration, partly the fault of other Administration, everything from our job gigantic national debt to the overvaluing of securities to, frankly, the tariff program, which is if they hadn't done it we probably wouldn't have seen this correction.  That doesn't mean that it's a bad idea, but that's . . .

12:22.  Well the tariff program, let's remember it's not the Ten Commandments, okay.  It wasn't graven in stone and brought down to the people from Sinai.  It was a negotiating tactic that applies bilaterally to individual countries and has different effects in different realms.  You know, maybe you, maybe deleterious to supply chains in certain industries, too, but can go away or be rebalanced next week.  In other words, Trump did something that I think I haven't witnessed for a long time.  He found the on-and-off switch in American politics.  We saw the switch go on and off and we saw the switch go on and off in one day.  He announced what is essentially an industrial policy, if you think of it long term, because the goal at least is being articulated as the reshoring of manufacturing and all sorts of other jobs that have gone to other countries.  But then we saw it blank off, and now he holds complete keys to the kingdom as far as I can see. 

Friday, April 11, 2025

CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS: This is simply NOT TRUE. Here is the real deal on why you do not want and you do not need a Real ID.

MARC LANDERS: CBD Takes Down Colorectal Cancer: How One Cannabis Compound Outsmarts Mutations via CB2 Receptor

"Cannabidiol Targets Colorectal Cancer Cells via Cannabinoid Receptor 2, Independent of Common Mutations," MD, Moniruzzaman, Kuan Yau Wong, Taskeen Iqbal Janjua, Jennifer H. Martin, Jakob Begun, Amirali Popat, ACS Pharmacol Transl Science, January 2025. 

DR. SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: Did you know that [polio] patients were being hyperventilated on the iron lungs? Once they stopped this problem, the death rate cut in half.

The Great Medical Hoax of the 20th Century, Lewis S. Coleman, MD, 2022.

from Amazon
This book explains how Dr. Chauncey Leake and Dr. Ralph Waters schemed to besmirch the reputation of the nurse-anesthetists who dominated anesthesia service in the aftermath of WWI, and replace the nurses with MD anesthesiologists. They did this by fabricating false accounts of medical disasters and perverted animal research to support the notion that carbon dioxide is “toxic waste, like urine, that must be rid from the body.” In so doing they defamed the reputation of Dr. Yandell Henderson, whose CO2 research had proved that carbon dioxide provides perhaps the most potent and practical medical treatment yet discovered, devastated the nurse anesthesia profession that had embraced Henderson’s science as part of their anesthesia technique. Their powerful political strategy successfully established the anesthesiology profession, but left it enmeshed with a set of false medical principles that have exaggerated surgical morbidity and mortality ever since. Every person who faces surgery should read this book.


 

The White House is considering using our tax dollars to give $10,000 per year to every person in Greenland, per NYT

NYT is behind a paywall as you know.  Title of the article is, "Inside Trump’s Plan to ‘Get’ Greenland: Persuasion, Not Invasion"

The island’s population might not be easily convinced as the president tries to cinch what he may see as one of history's greatest real estate deals. 

The event that is driving the modern world over the last 400 years, almost 400 years now, is what is called the Peace of Westphalia, two treaties at Innsbruck, 1645, and Munster, 1649, fascinating. What it was was the transition from hereditary princes to merchant princes and bankers as the ones who are guiding and driving and owning the ship.  That didn't happen in quite this British Isles which was beginning to become an empire under the British East Indies company because it had a very strong hereditary monarchy and nobility Henry VII had broken from the Catholic Church quite substantially and they had fought that out under Elizabeth so there wasn't their ability to do this religious Warfare in the British Isles that they were able to do on the continent to put themselves into power.  They took a king out and worked with the Congress Kim the parliamentarian the industrialist they use the guilds Regulators in their bullies bully boys and they tore the king down King Charles the first who was fighting for the people to try and prevent all of this Cromwell came in Cromwell tries to do the same thing although in his dictatorial way and I'm no fan of Cromwell but I'm understand him cromwell's son was set up to for all intents and purposes be the next king although not titularly although Cromwell is the only man buried as a king in the United Kingdom that wasn't a king and I believe he's in Westminster there but I could be mistaken about that.  The point is is that the fight that it happened on the continent that has led to the westphalian world right the westphalian modern world based off of banking, Finance International Trade, "rule of law," nation states Etc was basically the end of feudalism we fought it in the United Kingdom and the British Isles for about 40 to 50 years cromwell's son proved to be incapable of playing this game at this 25,000 ft level game so they brought one of the Stuarts back over.  He was just a drunken womanizer.  And so finally they brought William of Orange over this is the industrialist parliamentarians because that's who now had the power was the parliamentarians not the princes ostensibly over the people and the X checker and in 1688 he brought an army over funded by Continentals and took the crown of England by force at the invitation of the parliamentarian and the industrial estate were building up on the teams River at the time who needed the labor for their factories.  Who had the labor?  The princes. And their agrarian world so what happened in 1688 was this thing called the Glorious Revolution which is the biggest prawn stunt in the history of the world but it was anything but ever since the United Kingdom the British empire built out from there.

21:55. How does that factor into the formation of the bank of England in 1694? 

It's a direct extension of that.  Because what was happening is that the British Isles the Continentals still had all their own conflicts the British Isles weren't caught up in that and they had an Empire that was building out around the world where you got to infiltrate that Empire you've got to control that Empire you've got to use it energy and impulse and drive and how do you do that you control the city of London you control the King on the throne you make sure the king never has enough real power so that they are safe and secure on their own and you build up the parliamentarians you own and you transition power from the hereditary princes to the merchant princes instead

 22:41.  And then you control the monetary system the central bank or you can now control my argument at this point is that since then very intuitively and I only got this idea in my head when I read Neil Stephenson's Baroque Cycle, where he talks about that whole sequence of events I didn't understand but clearly the formation of the Bank of England was the beginning of this era of History we are coming to the end of this period in history where that style of Central Banking control of currency and currency Arbitrage has to end


Thursday, April 10, 2025

PAUL SALADINO: Snake Plant, Aloe Vera, Boston Fern, Spider Plants, English Ivy, and other plants act as Natural Air Filters . . .

LUONGO: Yesterday’s events bear out that the real purpose of “Liberation Day” was to smoke out who was really our enemies in trade.

DR. WILLIAM DAVIS: Collagen rebuilds the walls of arteries, especially aorta. Collagen reduces blood pressure, improves arterial health


The FDA says a lot of dopey things.  For instance, a very important protein for our health and youthfulness is collagen.

Where do you get collagen?  The marbling in your beef and pork, the skin on poultry and fish, heart, tongue, brain, stomach, intestine, organ meats.

Why is that?  Well, you get collagen you have smoother skin in the dermal layer.  And ladies are very concerned about their epidermis, the external, but it's the dermal layer that's the primary determinant of skin appearance and health.  So collagen ads dermal collagen.

Collagen when you ingest it adds to joint cartilage because joint cartilage is 70% collagen.  

You rebuild the walls of arteries, especially aorta. Collagen reduces blood pressure, improves arterial health.  It has spectacular effects, but the FDA says "But we don't care; it's not essential."

Wednesday, April 9, 2025

A 1st grader was punished for writing “All Lives Mater.” The school district argues 1st graders are too young to have free speech. The Court of Appeals points out that if they’re too young for controversial topics, then why are they learning about BLM??

Marilyn Monroe's diet consisted of raw eggs in milk, steak, lamb chops, beef liver . . .

100% Accurate on Each Count

Joel Salatin's blog is The Lunatic Farmer.  

He's now an advisor to the Secretary of the USDA, Brooke L. Rollins.  Salatin confirms this on his website

I’ve been contacted by the Trump transition team to hold some sort of position within the USDA and have accepted one of the six “Advisor to the Secretary” spots, declared Salatin on his website.

Cows are herbivores.   

This is the problem with the information wars.  It's not just misinformation, disinformation, and other forms of lying, without quoting Salatin of this vision, ABCNews takes it upon itself to tell people what Salatin's vision for the USDA is, actions and views that didn't happen. 

ABC News jumps the gun, citing a presumed version of Salatin's vision for the agency, 

Salatin’s Polyface Farm in Swoope, Virginia, stands as a model of regenerative farming and traditional agricultural methods. By promoting local food systems and rejecting the reliance on harmful chemicals, Salatin has inspired a generation of modern homesteaders committed to living sustainably. His leadership at the USDA signals a monumental step toward transforming the nation’s agricultural landscape. 

ABCNews makes it sound like Salatin is heading the agency, "Key Goals for the USDA Under Salatin’s Leadership," then presents "his" vision for the agency, 

Salatin’s vision for the future of farming in America includes several transformative objectives. 

That may very well be, but where's the proof?

  • Eliminating chemical farming: Transitioning away from pesticides, herbicides, and synthetic fertilizers to protect soil health and public well-being.
  • Advancing sustainable agriculture: Prioritizing regenerative practices that enhance soil fertility, reduce waste, and promote biodiversity.
  • Banning GMOs and harmful inputs: Phasing out genetically modified organisms, glyphosate-based herbicides like Roundup, and seeds sourced from questionable origins.
  • Ending antibiotic and hormone use in livestock: Advocating for healthier farming methods that reject the overuse of pharmaceuticals in animal husbandry.
  • Promoting soil and food health: Educating farmers and consumers about the critical link between mineral-rich soil and nutrient-dense food.