So the civilian framework of Public Health disappeared. It just got swallowed up by the biodefense framework, and now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world, which is utterly and completely counter to medicine and science in public health. --Debbie Lerman
WAKE UP, MAHA
— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) April 18, 2025
"Fauci wasn't in charge...He was the public relations face of the policy...The gov't entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council...and now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world." https://t.co/SstHpcslnM
The biodefense global public partnership includes all of the public health agencies and stuff on a national level, but they're not the ones who are in charge. So they're the ones who are just enacting the policy, and that's where everybody has to be really, really clear. Fauci was not in charge. Please get that out of your mind. Yes, we can prosecute him. Yes, we can blame him for a lot of things. He didn't make the policy. He didn't come up with the policy, and he didn't enforce the policy. He was the public relations face of the policy. Sure, he's a terrible person. I would be happy if he were on trial, but I don't think that's where we should be focusing all of our attention.
00:45. And that's why they brought in Birx.
00:48. Yes, so Debra Birx is representative of the National Security State. So what happens . . . so that's why I'm saying, so the second tier is the public health agencies, but what I discovered through my research is that the government entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council. The National Security Council now again I have to emphasize that before COVID, I didn't want to know this. I didn't ever want to know about National Security, FBI, CIA, . . . yeah, it's not my thing and so I just went where my research took me and unfortunately that's where it took me, and so I had to go there. And so the National Security Council is defined as "the leaders of the military and intelligence arms of government that are advising the president on National Security." That's the definition. Now, that was the definition before COVID. They changed it. So you have to look up the Way Back Machine to find that definition. Now the way they define it is, yes, it's the intelligence and military, but, of course, it's also pandemics, disasters, anything that requires national coordination now is going to be coordinated through the National Security Council. That's scary because they have expanded the definition of what the National Security Council is supposed to do and in doing that they've incorporated Public Health into what they call Biosecurity, a biosecurity framework. A biosecurity framework, the one that they came up with, is based on a biodefense response to outbreaks, which is lockdown until vaccine. And what that was supposed to be for, it was supposed to be for when there was an Anthrax attack let's say on a subway system in a big city, you could lockdown that city, make sure that it didn't get, it didn't spread further getting brush treatment to the people in the affected area. It would be a very limited geographic and temporal event. That's what a lockdown until . . . and it's not lockdown until vaccine; it's lockdown until countermeasures. So they would rush the counter measures. They had EUA, which is Emergency Use Authorization, which in that situation was important because you rush the treatment to the people in that area even if you don't know that it's definitely going to to be effective; it's such a big emergency biowarfare, bio terrorism, you got to rush it to the people. There might be some collateral damage. We're in a military situation here, right, so in a military situation collateral damage is a whole different consideration than in a civilian framework of Public Health. So the civilian framework of Public Health disappeared. It just got swallowed up by the biodefense framework, and now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world, which is utterly and completely counter to medicine and science in public health
No comments:
Post a Comment