DIANA WEST: yes, immigration [is] an important, important tactic used by the Communists to infiltrate the United States and other Western countries

the Communist Party never really trusted it's American acolytes.  Always wanted to have foreign born controllers here.  I mean this is a matter of command and control.  So right from the Russian Revolution forward, you see the Left, the Communist Left, the fellow Travelers agitating for immigration in order to be able to bring in these kinds of people, bring in these Legions who are also hostile to the American way as part of their unrestricted warfare we might call it today.  --Diana West

J Comey & D. Horowitz topical: WATCH Diana West's great VDARE video (2)
17:44 - FBI Chief Comey had extreme Left academic tracks. A declared Communist in his college years.
AMERICAN BETRAYAL enemies Horowitz etc:
ex-Communists… who ended up on the Right as a career, I believe… pic.twitter.com/uFzrm1n6BY

— Patrick Cleburne (@PCleburneVdare) May 16, 2025

7:35. Stanley Rothman's book on the new left.  He made the point there that there are two counter types on the new left: the gentile people on the new left, who are in genuine revolt against the families, and the Jews who were supportive by the families.  

7:45.  It does continue today, and I would even add that the New Left in my experience and in analysis, I go into this in The Red Thread, the New Left was just a name, a new name, for a younger generation of the Old Left.  They tried to pretend that it was something different.  It really wasn't.  It was just a continuation of the same communist war against America.  But that is true, and these people replicate themselves.  You mentioned we only scratched the surface in terms of outing any of these people.  Most of them never suffered anything in terms of coming to trial for, say, treason or something, something serious like that.  That did not happen except they point to the Rosenberg case. I always think of them as sort of small fry in a much larger conspiracy, one conspiracy amongst so many.  So these people were never truly revealed the thought of people like Whittaker Chambers, and Elizabeth Bentley, Igor Gouzenko, the defector out of Canada, they believe there were multiple rings that were being run in the middle of the 20th century that never ever were exposed.  Now they only had a window into one or two of these rings and some other people, so if you had all these other rings running inside the federal bureaucracy, well, who did those people ensure moved into their seats, into their slots, into their network after they left?  So we've seen this replication of regenerations of like-minded people who are, now, we call it the Deep State, now call it the Swamp, but this is the origin of it, and it does go back that far. People tend to think everything went wrong with Obama, you know, talking about the short memory we observe.  But it goes back at least 100 years in terms of the assault.  Also, through immigration, to tip onto your bailiwick here, but the notion that the Communist Party never really trusted it's American acolytes.  Always wanted to have foreign-born controllers here.  I mean this is a matter of command and control.  So right from the Russian Revolution forward, you see the Left, the Communist Left, the fellow Travelers agitating for immigration in order to be able to bring in these kinds of people, bring in these Legions who are also hostile to the American way as part of their unrestricted warfare we might call it today. 

10:13.  Can you tell us what the Venona transcripts are?

10:20.  Sure, they even know the transcripts are decrypts, about 2000 released decrypts of KGB conversations that took place largely in the 1940s that were copied by Western Union during World War II.  And they were actually along the order of something like 2 million of these communications.  We only have about 2,000 that have been released, and they attest to the maneuvering and more administrative in some ways, activities of Soviet agents working here, many of them, hundreds of them, inside the federal government and surrounding institutions with their controllers with Moscow Center.  They were released, it is important to know, by the US government by the intelligence agencies.  So in other words, it wasn't as if there was a wholesale release and scholars could go pick and choose what they would like to read.  We were given a set of these things and we've been using them ever since sort of to corroborate what the actual deal . . . 

11:25.  When were they released?

11:26.  They were released in the 1990s . . . I would say early 90s, 1993, '94. After we started seeing some revelations coming out of Moscow, not before.  Again, they were control-released by government authorities in the former Soviet Union.  So, in other words, we do see this not as something really a free-wheeling revelation, but a controlled revelation which has been very helpful but I do not believe it attests to what was really known inside the security agencies.

12:02.  So the question is why doesn't Donald Trump just order them to be released?

12:06.  I don't know if he's aware of this particular not you know at this point Tempest I mean I wish I actually Drew up a plan to declassifier in Chief in 2016 because there are just piles and piles probably miles and miles archives that should be of archives that should be unredacted and released to the public that go back 100 years 80 years spy rings that everyone is long deceased of black ink if you look at the paperwork and then going forward through so many other scandals that have been kept from the American people and important National Security issues that tend to by staying secret perpetuate the power of the swamp the stature of the traitors in our midst and all the rest of it.  They don't protect anyone good in other words.

13:04.  One of the things that fascinates me about this is this is so often hereditary.  That's one of the things that Rothman pointed out the new Left literally was the second generation of the old left and of course they've continued to reproduce themselves the strong personal connections across the generations.  One of my other great interests is you know have a great speech which Enoch Powell who gave a great speech that kicked off the immigration debates in Britain in 1968 and Powell was sort of like a subtle Trump in that he was able to throw bombs and can then defend himself one of the bombs he threw in the years after he gave his great speech on immigration and was a major figure in British politics, conducting a kind of guerilla war against the establishment.  At one point, he said he wondered if the revelations about communist infiltration the Hallmark of the Department of Interior for them that there had been communist infiltration there, if it hadn't continued to be responsible for the Paradox of the immigration policy where they're letting in people who were obviously of course his point was he simply said I said I wonder I wonder about it I wonder about it too in the context of the US where is immigration policy in the US come from?

14:46.  Absolutely there has to be because no Institution was impervious to the same kind of subversion infiltration embeddedness.  I mean this is what you really do start to get a better sense of when you look at the Venona, the Vasiliaev, the FBI declassifications, the Senate sessions, that were declassified later, you know, the executive sessions later declassified.  I mean this is what comes through loud and clear.  Many of our lawmakers had a real handle on it going back to the 1950s and we're doing things about it but they were constantly assaulted by the same left and media infiltration is also something real.  Whittaker Chambers wrote about the communist cell in Time Magazine.  We know about the various departments and agencies of the US government that were infiltrated.  So, yes, immigration is an important, important tactic here.  As I mentioned earlier you know there was a very good Roosevelt, I consider him, Archibald Roosevelt, who is the son of Teddy Roosevelt.  He was very big on unmasking communist infiltration, and he gave a really important testimony before Congress in the mid 50s.  And he was discussing how communism used immigration everywhere to advance their armies going back to the Russian Revolution and forward.  He was using the example, for example, Hungary after the Russian Revolution.  You saw Bolsheviks entering Hungary after World War II, the same, so that by the time you get to the takeover in 1956 of Hungary you had this whole Trojan Army in place and he was making the case at the same thing happened here.  So you are exactly dead on in terms of people coming in through immigration and then the government pushing for this kind of thing from the Left.  I mean again, it's always the same kind of combination.  You actually have the hardened actors and agents then you have your fellow travelers who believe in the same goals, and you also have your dupes.  I mean always with these activities there are so many people who have no idea they are being manipulated, however, they are part of essentially what we might think of as communist fronts.  Our government becomes a  Communist front, various sectors of a Communist front once there is this kind of infiltration.  I mean just look at the Roosevelt White House, where you have senior advisors to the president later unmasked just in Venona as Soviet agents, whether it was Lachlan Currie, some of the other people in the offices there.  The case against Harry Hopkins is quite strong.  I go through that piece by piece in American Betrayal.  I mean these were the men influencing American policy making at the highest level.  So, yes, it definitely happened in the State Department we know, and the related immigration agencies.  Has to be.  Has to be.

17:42.  The Red Thread is basically your account of how the intelligence agencies organized a coup against Trump.  Just tell us who the chief actors were.

18:03.  We're looking at your Brennans, your Comeys, your Clappers, your Nelly Ohr from the group Fusion GPS that came up with the  dossier.  Christopher Steele her opposite number of former MI6, she had . . even

18:21.  are you saying these people obviously had left wing connections obviously before we even saw them doing this kind of thing.

18:31.  Well I don't think they were obvious to anyone but themselves.  But they are obvious to anyone who takes a look to see what motivates these people.  I mean what motivates these people could I find their ideas because they are such cyphers when you see them in testifying or in print or just look at their CVs.  You don't really know who they are except officials but it turned out there was quite a lot of information about a number of them often in their own words, whether their college thesis.  John Brennan, for example, I mean, James Comey, for example, or John Brennan's Master thesis.  His own John Brennan actually fessed up in public that he had been, that he had voted for Gus Hall in 1976 in his CIA interview and was not cut off.  I mean this is such an extraordinary thing.

19:29.  People tend to think of the FBI particularly the CIA as being right wing.  But of course the Nazis started it all particularly the CIA it's always been a liberal establishment operation.

19:41.  It's always been prey to infiltrators it's been prey to disinformation and party to it I mean this is the reality that we have to accept about these agencies the FBI I think fell at a later date but when you look at James Comey's own writings, his own behaviors he's a very much an "ends justifies the means" social justice warrior.  His ideal to this day starting from the time he was a young man and a self-professed communist at William and Mary was Reinhold Neibuhr.  He claims Reinhold Neibuhr to this day as his leading intellectual influence.  Well, Reinhold Neibuhr especially in the writings that Comey cites as having been so in influential on him was essentially a Marxist in a clerical collar, someone who was always pro-Soviet, pushing for recognition of the Soviet Union in the 1930s, always an opponent of the anti-communist of the day.  He had a very clear record of writings actually, even proselytizing for violent overthrow of the established order on college campuses in the 1930s.  I mean he was a real radical.  And when you actually look at Comey the Communist falling in love intellectually . . .

21:00.  Do you think that Comey has left wing connections when he was at college?

21:02.  I don't know what connections he had but he described himself as a communist his own words in 2003 and my point being that Reinhold Neibuhr being his intellectual leader back when he was a communist it is very strange to me that someone who was not a communist is still so guided by him in terms of his communist leanings, social justice, using the law to redistribute wealth and justice, and these are the main ideas of Reinhold Neibuhr in the writings that Comey draws from.  So he's certainly not your typical FBI recruit who would have come in under J Edgar Hoover.  I mean this is what happened to that agency and he ran it.  And was involved in this Palace coup against the president along with all of these other ideological cohorts Christopher Steele, . . . 

21:58.  What did you think they were . . . the curious thing about this is that it developed after the election. I guess they thought . . . what do you think they were actually aiming to do to, get him impeached, or what? 

22:10.  Well, I think hey they were trying to protect themselves and what had been going on inside this government for generations. I mean I think that the fact that they all took such dangerous steps rather than just simply let Trump go come back in 2 years, take over the Congress, I mean that's what we normally do when you get thrown out of power, you come back into power.  So there was something abnormal here about these machinations, this International conspiracy that certainly efforts to subvert the election, the presidency, and the rest of it, and spy on the domestic opposition, that is not normal.  And so when you ask yourself why would they risk everything, of course they assumed Hillary would win, but still do the seditious things, you have to start wondering what the game really was.  My assessment of it is that they were, A) trying to cover everything up that they'd been doing; B) I think ideologically they could not be more opposed to Donald Trump and everything he stands for because he is the man who came to build the nation, again to impose, you know, to build a wall, to impose the immigration controls, to bring manufacturing home; in other words, to interrupt the New World Order, which had been in perfect motion since certainly 1945 in terms of taking away our sovereignty, our nationalism, and everything else, and ending up with this Global type governance, and International economy, and all the rest of it.  And going back to that period . . . just remember who set up the UN, who set up the IMF.  Two Soviet agents who worked very high, at high levels in the American government: Alger Hiss at the UN, and Harry Dexter White at the IMF.  I mean that's pretty astonishing when you actually think about it and where we are.

24:00.  I was very taken with the releases of the list of journalists in 2008 and 9 when it became obvious that all of these Elite Left-wing journalist from different and allegedly.

25:50.  Well they'd work it out and publish it in a daily worker and other organs I mean it was a much slower day right now you can look on Twitter and look at the thought leaders and sort of pick it up right there.  They probably don't need anything like journalists although they may have one I don't know but yes you notice the coordination you notice the pressure to coordinate the pressure not to say something else that's a big part of this as well some of it is staged I'm sure as you say some of it I think becomes a psychological just a psychological on scene pressure I mean people definitely know how to play up to someone and make sure their career continues in a certain way right?  So someone I mean it is like a mass kind of psychosis I guess

Alien Nation: Common Sense About America's Immigration Disaster, Peter Brimelow, 1995.  Thank you to this post. 

JAIME DIMON: We have to control the borders. We need more merit-based immigration.

You don't say Jamie.... https://t.co/yIcBbmiN18

— Tom Luongo (Head Sneetch) (@TFL1728) September 24, 2024

We are screwing up tons of other things, including immigration.  But life isn't either or, so when your kids say we'll do this or that . . .  You know, you're dealt the hand you're dealt, and you got to deal with it.  So we should be very clear about helping the lower-income population.  Every country has to control the borders, and we have to control the borders.  So they're all important.

00:22  Would you take the deal that the Republicans put on the table, which is we want this border and immigration policy as we've laid out, and then we'll fund the rest.  Would you take that than neither?

00:32  I have not read that deal in total, but I probably would take it.  We have to control the borders.  We need more merit-based immigration.  We need more seasoned immigration.  [seasoned?  You mean of a certain age?]  We need DACA to have a place here.  We need a path to citizenship.  If you do not control the borders, you are going to destroy our country.  And so I think the people who think that somehow it's okay, well now that they're sending the migrants into New York and stuff like that . . . so to all of my super liberal friends, now they realize what a problem it is.  Did it have to be that?  So we want to have a big heart for the world, but we have to control [the border and immigration].

Ireland immigration statistics: 2005 was 589,046.00, a 68.03% increase over 2000. 2000 was 350,552.00, a 54.5% increase over 1995, . . .

Thank you to Lew Rockwell.  The immigration in Ireland has been building for 20-plus years and has recently turned into chaos.

Writes Tim McGraw:

Recent riots in Dublin after a migrant stabbed children and adults on Parnell Street are in the news. Lots of blah-blah-blah. But what are the numbers? Why would the Irish be upset about migrants seeking to migrate to Ireland?

Ireland’s population is a bit above 5 million.

Here are the migrant numbers:

• Ireland immigration statistics for 2015 was 746,260.00, a 2.15% increase from 2010.
• Ireland immigration statistics for 2010 was 730,542.00, a 24.02% increase from 2005.
• Ireland immigration statistics for 2005 was 589,046.00, a 68.03% increase from 2000.
• Ireland immigration statistics for 2000 was 350,552.00, a 54.5% increase from 1995.

The numbers for 2020 aren’t even listed. But the numbers above add up to around 2.3 million.

So HALF of Ireland’s population is foreign born? Is that true? Is Ireland even a country anymore?

In 2021, 27% of California’s population was foreign-born.

These are huge migrations of people and changes in demographics. There’s bound to be some friction.

CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS: Trump is promoting the digital ID and Biometrics to deal with the immigration problem

Trump is promoting the digital ID and Biometrics to deal with the immigration problem.  Do not let the Republicans trick you into a control grid.  Don't get tricked into "Cancel the Fed" and then end up with the BIS and the IMF.  Don't get tricked into Biometrics and a digital ID to deal with the immigration problem that the federal government created and can absolutely address without all the things because they're just tricking you into a control grid.  --Catherine Austin Fitts

"They have to replace [Biden]. They have no choice, they have to..."

"Trump is promoting the digital ID and biometrics to deal with the immigration problem—do not let the Republicans trick you into a control grid."

Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the… pic.twitter.com/rJ9hp4rCPP

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) June 16, 2024

00:58. And I'm going to be the bad guy now, you know, Trump is promoting the digital ID and Biometrics to deal with the immigration problem.  Do not let the Republicans trick you into a control grid.  Don't get tricked into "Cancel the Fed" and then end up with the BIS and the IMF.  Don't get tricked into Biometrics and a digital ID to deal with the immigration problem that the federal government created and can absolutely address without all the things because they're just tricking you into a control grid.  I hate to say it . . . if you look at who Trump put into the cabinet, you know, he put into the Cabinet a lot of people who were basically part of the Syndicate that's trying to build the control grid.  So before you get enthusiastic about the Republicans, you got to hold their feet to the fire that they better, they better reverse the control grid.  Demand that they reverse the control grid.  Demand it. 

"The Eugenics era court that authored Jacobson also approved racial segregation, praised monopolies, cheered child labor, imprisoned people for speeches, . . ."

The Eugenics era court that authored Jacobson also approved racial segregation, praised monopolies, cheered child labor, imprisoned people for speeches, banned minimum wage laws, ordered forced sterilizations, and stripped millions of their rights based on their parents' ancestry

— Robert Barnes (@barnes_law) September 13, 2021

A few historical events from the Eugenics era: 

Three generations of imbeciles are enough, --Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes

This is stunning to me.  A Supreme Court justice, men who interpret the law of the land, calls for eugenics programs with this statement.  

Then there's the exclusionary 1924 Immigration Act: 

COHEN: Yeah, so the 1924 law really changed American immigration dramatically whereas in the old days, people would pretty much just show up at Ellis Island. The people who supported the Immigration Act of 1924 wanted to maintain the racial composition of the United States, so they imposed national quotas, which actually set the immigration from different countries on what that country's percentage of the population was in 1890. And the idea was that was a time when there were a lot of, you know, so-called Nordics in the United States. 

Half of all U.S. sterilizations were conducted in California.  

Armed with seemingly scientific and medical explanations, eugenicists wanted to make sterilization legal. By 1910, genetic statutes had been enacted in Washington, California, and Connecticut, and by the end of the 1920s, twenty-four states had passed involuntary sterilization laws.⁷ A major force behind this increase in eugenics legislation was Harry Laughlin, superintendent of the Eugenics Record Office (ERO). In 1922, Laughlin authored a model sterilization law that became the prototype for similar laws enacted in The United States. By January 1935, approximately 20,000 involuntary eugenic sterilizations had been performed in the United States, half of which were conducted in California.⁸

High unemployment and poverty rates contributed to the public's tolerance for eugenic sterilization.

Another major motivation for eugenics was the heavy immigration—and its attendant xenophia—that the United States experienced around the turn of the century. Many psychiatrists warned that if better medical inspections of immigrants were not performed, the consequences would be deportation or sterilization. Eugenicists’ testimony before Congress helped pass the exclusionary 1924 Immigration Act. The economic depression of the 1920s and 1930s, with its high unemployment and poverty rates, further contributed to the public’s tolerance for eugenic sterilization. 

The guy who influenced the Eugenics movement in Congress was Harry H. Laughlin, 1880-1943.

"permissive immigration. . . sent an incentive to people of the world that they can now come [to the U.S.] and abuse asylum laws"

You know they're not refugees, because, where are the women? 

Imagine a swarm of rats eating you alive, starting at your feet and moving up your body. Eventually you’ll die. Nothing is preventing you from swatting these rats away and saving yourself except a self proclaimed declaration that you’re a safe haven for rats. What a way to die.   https://t.co/cxxfvPIu9p

— Sam Shoemate (@samosaur) October 20, 2023

The full 3-hour and 42-minute interview is here.  Rogan hosts Coleman Hughes.

The full unfolding of it goes back to the 1930s.  New York State made a constitutional amendment to the state constitution that required the state to provide housing for the homeless.  It was vaguely worded, so in the 80s and 90s, the courts in New York began interpreting that law more and more strictly.  Almost no other state I'm not sure if other states have something in its state constitution requiring that kind of a thing . . . .  The original purpose of this was for citizens of New Yorker state, but the judges began interpreting it so strictly that when the Republican governors in Texas and Florida begin sending a few thousand migrants up to New York City as kind of an f*ck you to liberal cities that have declared themselves sanctuary cities without actually having to actually deal with the border crisis does that Texas does.  The first few thousand found that legally New York had to house them.  And then word got down to Mexico that if you make it to New York City, you will not be turned away.  Legally, you don't even have to be a citizen before the state amendment to apply to you.  So what began as a few . . . let's say 10 or 15,000 were sent by the Republican Governors as a kind of political tactic has now become tens and tens and tens of thousands coming of their volition to New York City, and it's the only state in the country that mayor Adams has no legal recourse to send people elsewhere he actually cannot do it he's tried to do executive orders but he legally can't because it's in the state constitution.  It's above his power.  And now it's taken on a life of its own way over and above what the Republican governors started so this is why he's going to the National media and literally saying you know I can't do anything about this I'm trying to do something about this but I can't and we are putting people up in Airbnbs for $100 a night years if we don't find a solution to this.   

I was looking at a video of the Roosevelt Hotel which is no longer a hotel.  The state has essentially said that this is now a center for housing migrants, and they've said the restaurant is no longer a restaurant.  Sorry, that's just how it is now.  What do you do if you own the Roosevelt Hotel and you just want it to be a hotel and now the state just says nope?

3:33. Look, I don't blame any of these people.  If I was born in Mexico, . . . and we'd all be doing the same thing.  It's the smart thing to do from their perspective, but that doesn't mean from our perspective that we should just put out the bat signal to the whole world and say you can come to New York City and we have no legal recourse to move you anywhere else.

3:57. It's not just New York City, it's other parts of the world.  It's strange that recently it's become this crisis where migrants are coming en mass to these places and just letting them.  Is this orchestrated?  Is this just the fact that they found out that they can do it and it's better than where they are, and if they go there these places that are charitably minded, who want a house people who are down their luck, but now people are taking advantage and just swarming?  

4:33. I think that's what it is I think the whole Western world has become much more open to immigration recently.  Obviously, America was open to immigration in the 19th century, but we were the outlier.  In all the other countries in the world, the default was that they had closed borders.  So I think the whole world out of empathy for the poor and struggling has wanted to have more permissive immigration but that sent an incentive to people of the world that they can now come that they can abuse asylum laws and again I don't even blame people for doing this because it's exactly what I would do if I were born in Guatemala or Syria this is my story and I would probably lie about it in order to get a better life than the one I had.  These are just a side effect of these compassionate laws.  People abuse them.  You get immigration pools that are vastly proportionately male, which is how you know that they're not refugees because, you know, where are the women?  It's a side effect of the intended compassionate immigration policy.  That's how this works.  Thomas Sowell's great quote, "There are no solutions, only trade-offs." It's more compassionate, but it also leads to, in the case of New York, what could be a serious fiscal crisis. 

Reporter: “Harris said that the border is closed. Is the border closed?” Illegal Immigrant: “The border is open…everybody believes that the border is open

Chuck: Would you call the border secure?

Harris: Yes.

Chuck: We’re going to have 2 million people cross this border for the first time ever. You're confident this border is secure?

Harris: Yes, but we have problems because Trump.

They simply ignore reality and blame Trump. pic.twitter.com/ncFbpf5G1K

— Merissa Hansen 🇺🇸 (@MerissaHansen17) September 15, 2022

TODD:  Would you call the border secure? 

She can't answer that. 

HARRIS:  I think that there is no question that we have to do what the president and I asked what the Congress to do . . . the first request we made: pass . . . a bill to create a pathway to citizenship.  The border is secure, but we also have a broken immigration system, particularly over the last four years before we came in and it needs to be fixed.

TODD:  We're going to have 2 million people cross this border for the first time ever.  You're confident this border is secure? 

HARRIS:  We have a secure border in that that is a priority for any nation, including ours and our administration.  But there are still a lot of problems that we are trying to fix, given the deterioration that happened over the last 4 years. 

So, in less than one minute, Kamala Harris was able, with the help of Chuck Todd, to blame Donald Trump for a broken immigration system.  I don't think that takes only 4 years, sister.  Democrats have been in charge of voting, education, immigration, and a host of other federal services.  Stop lying, Ms. Harris.   

What's that phrase?  Oh, yeah, straight from the horse's mouth. 

BREAKING NEWS! They just bussed illegals to KAMALA’S HOUSE!!!😂pic.twitter.com/LNvwqB9e8V

— Lavern Spicer 🇺🇸 (@lavern_spicer) September 15, 2022

Reporter: “Harris said that the border is closed. Is the border closed?”

Illegal Immigrant: “The border is open…everybody believes that the border is open. It’s open because we enter. We come in, free, no problem…We came illegally.” pic.twitter.com/Ymk2blTcXt

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) September 15, 2022

We can't house everyone here that lives here and works here.  Huh.  Hasn't this been the whole point with regard to immigration and illegal immigration for decades?  But our complaint has fallen on a deaf ear.   

To be clear, Martha’s Vineyard residents voted at 80% for Joe Biden. There is no excuse for their racism and xenophobia. https://t.co/TItZnBcYyl

— Cernovich (@Cernovich) September 15, 2022

CBP One app allows migrants to take commercial passenger flights from foreign countries straight to their American cities of choice, flying right over the border—and even over Mexico,”

I used to joke about this.  Turns out it's been Biden's immigration policy all along.

Apparently, illegal immigrants have been flying directly into the U.S. on commercial aircraft without even having to cross the border. 200,000 in the last year.  https://t.co/XZE89tXyE1

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) September 25, 2023

Not all illegal aliens are entering the U.S. along the southern or northern border, according to the Center for Immigration Studies.  

Over the past year, “more than 200,000 people from four countries” used a direct-flight parole program to enter the United States illegally, says Todd Bensman, a senior national security fellow at the Washington-based think tank devoted to researching immigration issues.  

Those 221,456 illegal aliens are from Haiti, Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua, Bensman writes in a report published Thursday.

Through a Freedom of Information Act request, or FOIA, Bensman says, he learned of the federal government’s “CBP One” mobile application parole program, which “permits inadmissible aliens to make an appointment to fly directly to airports in the interior of the United States, bypassing the border altogether.”  

The Biden administration introduced the CBP One mobile app to illegal aliens as a way to schedule an appointment at a port of entry and be paroled into the interior of the United States. (The acronym CBP refers to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, an agency within the Department of Homeland Security.)

President Joe Biden said the program was part of an effort to form “lawful pathways” for illegal aliens to enter the country and seek asylum. Illegal border crossings between ports of entry at the southern border appeared to decline in June as more illegal aliens presented themselves at a port of entry.  

But, according to Bensman’s findings, migrants also are presenting themselves at ports within the interior of the country.

One of the “least noticed, mysterious, and potentially the most controversial of the new rechanneling programs that use the CBP One app allows migrants to take commercial passenger flights from foreign countries straight to their American cities of choice, flying right over the border—and even over Mexico,” Bensman writes in the Center for Immigration Studies report titled “New Records: Biden DHS Has Approved Hundreds of Thousands of Migrants for Secretive Foreign Flights Directly Into U.S. Airports.”  

Through the CBP One app, “Cubans, Venezuelans, Nicaraguans, Haitians, and Colombians … [can] request ‘advance travel authorizations,’” Bensman writes, and then fly “directly into U.S. airports, where U.S. Customs officers parole them into the nation, sight unseen, and in numbers publicly unknown.” 

The documents obtained by the Center for Immigration Studies, he adds, show that “between late October 2022 and mid-September 2023, the administration approved a total of 221,456 Venezuelans, Haitians, Cubans, and Nicaraguans for ‘travel mode: air’ into still-unspecified interior U.S. ports.”  

"Under the immigration laws of the United States, a noncitizen who applies for an immigrant visa abroad . . . is required to receive vaccinations . . . ." To avoid the shots, noncitizens enter illegally. Unexpected or expected consequences?

Mandated vaccination for legal immigration?  Does this explain the massive illegal immigration, all to avoid the gene-manipulating shot? 

Check this out from Jeffrey Tucker.

Consider, for example, the continued requirement that any legally immigrating person coming to the US from another country and seeking residency is absolutely required to get the COVID-19 vaccine, a shot widely admitted not to protect against infection or spread and is associated with injury on a scale without pharmaceutical precedent. 

And yet the US government requires it. 

The evidence is here from the US Citizenship and Immigration Services. 

Meanwhile, the US is currently experiencing a wave of immigration from asylum seekers which this country has never seen in raw numbers before. There is no requirement that these people coming across the Southern border and then shipped around the country face any such requirement of Covid vaccination. That only kicks in if you seek to immigrate the old-fashioned way, which is to say, by seeking legal permission. 

So this is why we have issues like these. 

On President Biden's inauguration day, he introduced policies that incentivize illegal immigration: 1) Paused Deportations, 2) Suspended "Remain in Mexico," 3) Stopped Border Wall Construction

This surge in illegal immigration is a national security crisis, costing American taxpayers hundreds of billions per year. 

🚨America's illegal immigration crisis is shattering century-old records with alarming numbers:

2023: 3,201,144
2022: 2,766,582
2021: 1,956,519
2020: 405,036
2019: 859,501
2018: 404,142
2017: 310,531
2016: 415,816
2015: 337,117
2014: 486,651
2013: 420,789
2012: 364,768
2011:… pic.twitter.com/BEI9fKDNTQ

— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) January 4, 2024

2023: 3,201,144

2022: 2,766,582 2021: 1,956,519 2020: 405,036 2019: 859,501 2018: 404,142 2017: 310,531 2016: 415,816 2015: 337,117 2014: 486,651 2013: 420,789 2012: 364,768 2011: 340,252 2010: 463,382 On President Biden's inaugural day, he introduced policies that incentivize illegal immigration: • Paused Deportations • Suspended "Remain in Mexico" • Stopped Border Wall Construction Since these policy changes, over 8 million people have illegally entered the country, with millions more slipping past border patrol undetected. This surge in illegal immigration is a national security crisis, costing American taxpayers hundreds of billions per year. Major U.S. cities, grappling with the escalating financial burden, are slashing budgets for essential services such as fire, police, sanitation, and education. President Biden holds the power to halt this crisis that is draining America's resources. The solution is as simple as the actions that led to this crisis—Biden should use his pen to reverse his policy changes.

FOX NEWS: USCIS affirmed the fear via a positive finding of fear, and he was released on a $5,000 immigration bond in January 2019 after being given a Notice to Appear. He has remained in immigration proceedings ever since.

Full DHS background on Singh:

On September 20, 2018, Singh entered the United States at or near San Ysidro, CA, without being inspected, admitted, or paroled by an immigration officer.

On September 20, 2018, US Border Patrol arrested Singh and was served with an I-860 and…

— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) August 18, 2025

BREAKING: DHS & ICE confirm to @FoxNews that the illegal alien truck driver who killed 3 in a crash in Florida is an Indian national who initially crossed the California border illegally in September 2018 and was arrested by Border Patrol. Harjinder Singh was processed for expedited removal (fast track deportation) by the first Trump administration but claimed fear of going back to India. USCIS affirmed the fear via a positive finding of fear, and he was released on a $5,000 immigration bond in January 2019 after being given a Notice to Appear. He has remained in immigration proceedings ever since.

Singh was arrested by US Marshals in California on Saturday on a warrant for three counts of vehicular homicide in connection to the deadly crash in Florida. Photo of his arrest provided to FOX via federal source. Florida officials say the sanctuary state of California gave him a commercial driver's license. More DHS background on Singh to FOX: "According to Singh, he has no serious physical or mental medical conditions. Singh claims to have no known immediate relatives serving in the U.S. military and is not the primary caretaker of a person with mental or physical disability, a minor or person with a serious illness. Singh claims to not be married and has no minor dependent children. Singh is not a victim of a domestic violence in the United States or human trafficking. After careful consideration of all factors and available records, Singh is considered a significant threat to public safety and is an exceptional circumstance warranting enforcement action due to the serious nature of his criminal history. ERO San Francisco is seeking HRO’s approval to place Singh in removal proceedings."

Immigration to the US is now heavily subsidized by government handouts, and it’s a no-brainer that all welfare for immigrants must be abolished. It's also important to limit citizenship. But some aspects of the Trump plan dangerously empower government agencies in ways similar to the state-building legislation of the post-9/11 days. We don’t need more federal power in the US. We need less.

Let's talk about the Trump immigration plan plans from both a free market laissez-faire classical liberal perspective and look at what's good and bad about the plan some aspects of it are great no brainer they protect private property rights some aspects essentially expand Federal police powers and that's not a good thing. 

GOOD PART OF TRUMP'S IMMIGRATION PLANS 

00:29.  Cutting out welfare dollars.  In recent decades, the US Immigration system has become a government subsidized scheme.  Show up, get free money, access to schools.  All sorts of free stuff get thrown at migrants.  Even those who go through the legal system after only 5 years they get access to a wide variety of welfare programs.  Also get access to citizenship they're at least begin the process after 5 years. 

Also, brand new immigrants showing up and have money thrown at them, like these five-star New York hotels subsidized by the government to turn them into fake "refugee shelters."  You see this in cities like New York but really across all US cities.  Debit card with thousands of dollars on it; free housing in luxury hotels; free food, as well as free natal care.  Americans saw it as a problem.  Huh.  That's why they're voting for Trump.  So no downside to cutting all that immigration welfare in this scheme of subsidizing migration.  Nothing wrong with true private sector migration where someone gets invited, offers a job to these people or the private sector supports these people and these people have to be productive in return.  Situation when we're facing.

02:12.  Citizenship is not a property right there is no natural righteous citizenship in any particular place except for the tiny number of people who would be rendered truly stateless where they denied you a citizenship none of these people arriving would be stateless without being granted you as citizenship they already have citizenship in the countries they came from when a lot of them get citizenship in the US they don't renounce their old citizenship they now have dual citizenship showing that they were never at risk being stateless but by not having citizenship are not forfeiting any property rights we should expand the time Horizon for citizenship to at least 10 years maybe 20 this requires a person to be far more invested in the local community to contribute a lot more to the local economy before they can start to extract resources in the form of social benefits programs and that doesn't endanger anyone's property rights you don't have to be a citizen to acquire property to keep it to have legal contracts with others.

MASS DEPORTATION

03:40.  How do you accomplish Mass deportation?

Border agents don't have special powers to determine who is legal or illegal.  How do you determine this?  You have to conduct investigations. How do you conduct investigations you ask people what their citizenship status is you investigate them you spy on them essentially You observe them demand they provide proof of citizenship ask people for their papers I know we're going to be told by many conservatives if you're not doing anything wrong you have nothing to fear that's what these people told us with regards to the Patriot Act, the NSA spying, and the war on terror, in general, those vast expansions in the surveillance state, that a lot of conservative supported said "Hey, it's no big problem, because the government would never abuse its power."  Of course, we know, they always do.  So any scheme to go out and start investigating people more closely to determine what their citizenship status is, it's problematic.  Some migrants will volunteer themselves for deportation; these people are criminals in many cases.

05:54.  Since World War II, the US created this whole new idea of a "Border Zone."  [Border Patrol was created in 1924, and became part of US Customs & Border Patrol, CBP, in 2003.  This 25-mile wide border zone was created in 1952.] It's no longer just the border with a wall checking to see if a migrant is a felon; that's one thing that virtually nobody has a problem with.  But since World War II this new invention of the federal government, the obviously unconstitutional, 20th-century thing created was this 25-mile "Border Zone," where border agents can wander around asking people to prove their citizenship.  That was unilaterally extended without approval from Congress up to 100 miles and more recent decades.  You've seen videos with this on YouTube where people are just driving through the American Southwest and they're being stopped and asked about their citizenship.

07:20.  Going around asking citizens to justify their existence with paperwork is a problem.  We can't have a society that punishes private citizens for trying to rent an apartment to a person who doesn't have the correct government paperwork.  Or for someone who's paying a migrant to mow their lawn and they don't have the correct government paperwork.  These are all examples and excesses of Federal power expansion beyond a border issue.  Cutting off welfare dollars is the best start.  Or changing the citizenship situation that actually limits Federal power

None of these people arrive stateless.  By not having any citizenship, these people are forfeiting any property rights.  They have citizenship in their old country.  They are dual citizens.  We should expand the 

You don't have to be a citizen to acquire property, to keep it, to   

MR. AMERICA FIRST, DONALD TRUMP: I think you should get automatically as part of your diploma, a green card to be able to stay in this country

Trump Green Card for Every Illegal Who Graduates College

"America First" doesn't mean "Americans First". Now you know why Trump did NOTHING about immigration in his first term. Biden gives free college, Trump attaches Green Card — left/right professional tag team. pic.twitter.com/5ycCA4Odsu

— David Knight Show LIVE 9am EST, M-F (@libertytarian) June 24, 2024

Iceland has a Venezuelan migrant problem.  How did the Venezuelan migrants get across the ocean?  Well, of course, the Soros organizations will bring people across the oceans, no problem at all.  They've had an explosion of Venezuelans in Iceland, and they thought this is just wonderful, we're going to have diversity and all the rest of the stuff and then they see what is happening with all these young males that are being brought in.  What's the point?  What exactly is the point of bringing all these young Latin males from one culture and transplanting them into another, completely different Nordic culture?  What's the point of it?

Well, Iceland officials are pulling back their former support.  They say they've deported 180 migrants who had only recently arrived in Iceland.  The deportation bill was wildly popular even among the left Green Party, even the Greens were for this.  Among its internal Provisions they allowed Iceland to ignore the UN and its open border-styled immigration policy demands the legislation reportedly sets stricter conditions for residency, for family migration, and for other measures.  With the mood shifting against Venezuelans they've deported 180 recent Venezuelan migrants all at once.  No Iceland is very small compared to the United States in 2018 they had 14 Venezuelan immigrants within 4 years that had exploded to 1200 about 100 times it exploded and that was all coming from the UN.

Now they are in direct contradiction to a couple of UN Conventions that they had signed up for.  They had signed up for the UN Convention for Human Rights that doesn't allow them to deport anybody.  And the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.  That is the instrument to destroy parental rights, UN Convention in the Rights if the Child, every country has signed into that except the United States.  In the United States, it is not being done through treaty, it is being done through our courts, who have been destroying parental rights.  The good news is if there is a will to do something about it just like they're saying Iceland they realize what a problem this is.  They're saying, well I don't care if we're signed on to the UN Convention of Human Rights.  I don't care that we're signed on to the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child, and they just threw it out.  The only party that supports keeping the Venezuelans there, the only one, the Green Party, all the lefties except for the Pirate Party, and they opposed the bill.  But the other major Icelandic parties, including the Independence Party, the Progressive Party, the Left Greens, they all voted in favor of tightening the country's immigration policies, and they voted to kick them out.  

Now, contrast that with Donald Trump, for example. Donald Trump was going to stop immigration.  He was going to build a border.  He did none of that.  As a matter of fact, we got caravans as soon as they realized that Donald Trump was all talk and no action.  He didn't deport anybody he allowed Obama's executive order saying they were going to defer action, saying that we were going to defer action of the law and . . . .  Here's an executive order saying that my department of justice is not going to enforce the law.  How does that pass muster with the courts?  How does that pass muster with anybody?  Instead, Trump pretended that he couldn't create an executive order that countermanded Obama's executive order.  "Well, I really would like to do what I promised but I have to ask the courts for permission," and so he did it in this long drawn-out thing.  And the courts said, "No, you can't overturn Obama's executive order."  That can't possibly be true, and we all know that.  But as Trump was talking to CEOs he made an amazing revelation that came out over the weekend.  The CEO appeals,

We need to recruit the best and brightest of the world every time we get somebody super intelligent from India or Europe any country, and three of the four here are immigrants, into our country the ones without the toys and we can get these great people into our country and that's a loss for our adversaries and our competitors and it's a gain for us.  But I've never heard you talk about this. Can you please promise us you will give us more ability to import the best and brightest around the world to America? 

Trump answers,

I do promise, but I happen to agree, that's why I promise; otherwise, I wouldn't promise.  Let me just tell you that it's so sad that we lose people from Harvard, MIT, from the greatest schools, and the lesser schools that are phenomenal school also.  And what I wanted to do and I would have done this, but we had to solve the COVID problem because that dominated for a little while as you perhaps know.  But what I want to do and what I will do is if/when you graduate from a college, I think you should, I think you should get automatically as part of your diploma, a green card to be able to stay in this country.  If you graduate or get a doctorate degree from college you should be able to stay in this country.  And you know more stories than I do, but I know stories where people graduated from a top college or from a college and they desperately wanted to stay here, they had a plan for a company, a concept, and they can't.  They go back to India, go back to China.  They become multi-millionaires and employ thousands and thousands of people, and it could have been done here.  And a bigger example is you need a pool of people to work for your company.  You have great companies, and they have to be smart people.  Not everybody can be less than smart; you need brilliant people. 

6:32. All these people who have immigrated here, like Elon Musk and Vivek "the snake" Wami Swami, yeah, we don't want Americans here.  We want to be able to bring in other people in cuz Americans are crap, right?  I don't know how we ever got a country like this.  What happened?  How did it get here? You know, Americans can't do anything; we need foreigners to come in and fix everything.  You understand, don't you, that Trump was lying to you the whole time?  You understand that he never had any intention of doing anything about open immigration, and he doesn't either.  The idea from him that people are coming here and they're getting scholarships getting free rides . . . .

PETER ST ONGE: immigrants don't actually solve labor shortages because they bring their own labor shortage with them.

Japan is set to import 800,000 low-skill workers, allegedly to solve a labor shortage despite over 10 million working-age Japanese who are not working because wages are too low.

As in the US, voters are massively opposed. But, also as in the US, big business is pushing mass… https://t.co/GTrqY30gHb

— Wall Street Silver (@WallStreetSilv) April 11, 2024

After years of putting their own people first, the government of Japan is now embracing mass immigration.  A few days ago, Bloomberg reported that the number of foreign workers in Japan hit a record 2 million, up a quarter million in just two years.  That's in a country a third the size of the US so multiply everything by 3.  The workers are overwhelmingly blue collar, working assembly lines at factories.  That's half a million construction; retail at 600,000; and services and caregivers at 400,000.  Already some towns in Japan are a fifth foreign blue collar, which is new in Japan.  The Japanese government aims to rapidly accelerate this bringing in another $300,000 Blue Collar immigrants every year through 2040.  One pilot program aims at 800,000 starting immediately.  Incidentally, this is massively opposed by Japanese voters.  Bloomberg sites a 2018 survey that found just 23% of Japanese want more immigration with voters worrying it could lead to rising crime and jeopardize security and harmony.  Indeed just a few months ago, the Japanese government announced that crime had risen for the first time in 20 years, something Japanese might need to get used to.  

So if voters oppose it, who is pushing mass immigration?  As in the US, it's driven by companies who employ unskilled migrants who would like to pay peanuts and leave the social consequences to others.  What Japan's voters do want is for their government to address the flood of Japanese fleeing to other countries because domestic jobs don't pay enough. 

I've mentioned in recent videos how immigrants don't actually solve labor shortages because they bring their own labor shortage with them.  They go to the dentist, they go to restaurants, they need plumbers; otherwise, America could just annex Canada and have 40 million left over workers.  What mass immigrants do solve is shortages in specific industries, such as low skilled fruit pickers in the US, or taxi drivers in Japan.  The twist, of course, is that there are plenty of underemployed low-skilled natives in both America and Japan.  So fully 1 in 8 Japanese in their 20s and 30s are not working: it's about 5 million untapped workers.  For those in their 50s it's 1 in 4, so that's another five million on top of that.  As for Japanese who do have a job, one article last year profiled the typical experience for young Japanese trapped in low skill and low pay jobs 7-Eleven, for example, pays $5.71 an hour in Japan.  As the article puts it, those working poor "are happy to just stay afloat while they rent until death."  So forget starting a family or even saving up for retirement; they are living hand to mouth.  Why are those jobs so low paid?  Because there is not actually a shortage.  And importing 2 million low-skilled foreigners, actually 7 million by 2040, will make them even lower wage.

The mass immigration industrial complex sadly has reached one of the last holdouts.  As in Europe and America, voters do not want it but special interests write big political checks in Tokyo as much as in Washington.  The media will tar any opposition as xenophobia, while the young keep losing hope looking with envy on the childhood they themselves enjoyed but are now unable to provide.

BUTLEROFTHANOS: SCOTUS ruled in 1982 that cities and states couldn't deny access to public schools based on immigration status, forcing schools into having to accept illegal aliens ever since.

 

SCOTUS ruled in 1982 that cities and states couldn't deny access to public schools based on immigration status, forcing schools into having to accept illegal aliens ever since.

— ButlerofThanos (@ButlerofThanos) January 27, 2025

Citizens are scratching their heads trying to find out what so many undocumented Mexicans have been living in the United States for two to three decades unchecked and unenforced.  One, there is nothing to enforce because the Supreme Court provides for or guarantees illegal aliens to an education.  

Looks like Plyler, a Texas resident, brought a lawsuit against Texas in Plyler v. Doe.

Held: A Texas statute which withholds from local school districts any state funds for the education of children who were not "legally admitted" into the United States, and which authorizes local school districts to deny enrollment to such children, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 

Check out the language of the law.  "Whatever his status under the immigration laws, an alien is a "person" in any ordinary sense of that term."  

(a) The illegal aliens who are plaintiffs in these cases challenging the statute may claim the benefit of the Equal Protection Clause, which provides that no State shall "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Whatever his status under the immigration laws, an alien is a "person" in any ordinary sense of that term. This Court's prior cases recognizing that illegal aliens are "persons" protected by the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, which Clauses do not include the phrase "within its jurisdiction," cannot be distinguished on the asserted ground that persons who have entered the country illegally are not "within the jurisdiction" of a State even if they are present within its boundaries and subject to its laws. Nor do the logic and history of the Fourteenth Amendment support such a construction. Instead, use of the phrase "within its jurisdiction" confirms the understanding that the Fourteenth Amendment's protection extends to anyone, citizen or stranger, who is subject to the laws of a State, and reaches into every corner of a State's territory. Pp. 457 U. S. 210-216.  

The 1982 U.S. Surpreme Court case Plyler v. Doe established that denying children access to free public K-12 education violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.