WEALTHMOOSE: [Candaian] Schools, parks and public buildings renamed across the country. Then Trump renames Lake Ontario and suddenly Canada discovers: “YOU CAN’T JUST ERASE HISTORY!” Oh, NOW names matter? 😂🇨🇦

So that we're clear, Lake Ontario is jointly managed by the United States and Canada, with the province of Ontario bordering it to the north and the state of New York to the south.

🇨🇦 Canada spent years renaming streets, squares, universities, buildings and removing statues in the name of “reconciliation” and “reconsidering history.”

Yonge-Dundas Square → Sankofa Square.

Ryerson University → Toronto Metropolitan University.

Amherst Street → Rue… https://t.co/SxFNE8iGLu pic.twitter.com/b0D57jPYOY

— wealthmoose (@wealthmoose) August 28, 2026

Canada spent years renaming streets, squares, universities, buildings and removing statues in the name of “reconciliation” and “reconsidering history.” Yonge-Dundas Square → Sankofa Square. Ryerson University → Toronto Metropolitan University. Amherst Street → Rue Atateken. Cornwallis Street → Nora Bernard Street. Langevin Block → Office of the Prime Minister and Privy Council. Sir John A. Macdonald statues removed in Victoria, Regina, Kingston and Charlottetown. Schools, parks and public buildings renamed across the country. Then Trump renames Lake Ontario and suddenly Canada discovers: “YOU CAN’T JUST ERASE HISTORY!” Oh, NOW names matter? Apparently Canadian history is endlessly negotiable…

until an American picks up the Sharpie.  

Dr. Chaffee explained that our blood pH is normally kept between 7.35 and 7.45. He said if it drops to around 7.25, it can become a dangerous medical condition called metabolic acidosis. If it rises to around 7.55, it can become metabolic alkalosis. His point was that the body regulates blood pH extremely tightly because even small changes can be life-threatening.

ICYMI - Doctors in Canada renew calls to euthanize infants born with disabilities, stating it "may be an appropriate treatment," with the Quebec College of Physicians reiterating that deliberately ending a child's life constitutes "care."

Infant care in today’s Canada. https://t.co/Oj7pt81PDi

— J Michael Waller (@JMichaelWaller) August 28, 2026

DIANA WEST: “Soviet possession of an atomic bomb in 1949, due to the treachery of American Communists, helped precipitate the Korean War in 1950.” It wasn’t just the Rosenbergs who enabled the Soviet theft of U.S. atomic secrets

“Soviet possession of an atomic bomb in 1949, due to the treachery of American Communists, helped precipitate the Korean War in 1950.” It wasn’t just the Rosenbergs who enabled the Soviet theft of U.S. atomic secrets; West describes a “massive looting effort” underway inside the U.S. government itself, overseen by senior Washington officials.

from “Mark Tapson on Diana West’s American Betrayal,” Ruthfully Yours, Monday, July 8, 2013.

And yet the infiltration and deception of which they warned was vaster than most Americans know. “Expert estimates,” West writes, “now peg the number of Americans assisting Soviet intelligence agencies during the 1930s as exceeding five hundred.” She quotes the former chief of intelligence in Communist Romania, who told her, “During the Cold War, more people in the Soviet bloc worked for the dezinformatsiya machine than for the Soviet army and defense industry put together.” She quotes Joseph D. Douglass Jr. as saying, “The Soviets live and breathe deception. You cannot understand what they are doing without understanding this. Indeed, you can’t even begin to understand Communism without understanding deception.” Along the way in her new book, West raises new revelations for many readers, such as the fact that “Soviet possession of an atomic bomb in 1949, due to the treachery of American Communists, helped precipitate the Korean War in 1950.” It wasn’t just the Rosenbergs who enabled the Soviet theft of U.S. atomic secrets; West describes a “massive looting effort” underway inside the U.S. government itself, overseen by senior Washington officials. A central figure in the book is Harry Hopkins, FDR’s most intimate, ubiquitous, enigmatic, and even sinister adviser. Hopkins was the driving force behind the Lend-Lease program, whereby the United States supplied thousands of tons of war supplies and aircraft to the USSR, China, Great Britain and other Allied nations during the war (West devotes considerable attention to the consequences of this bounty to the Soviets, and quite a bit of space to Hopkins himself). His hand was often at the wheel of U.S. foreign policy. “Few men of this century,” wrote diplomat Robert Murphy about Hopkins, “have exerted more influence upon American politics, domestic and foreign.” West argues that the impact of this “deep occupation” did not simply fall away with the collapse of the Soviet Union. It lives today in our embrace of the Communists’ false historical narrative, exemplified in our “denial of the Soviet regime-engineered Famine in the Ukraine… a seminal moment in the history of the world. The seminal moment, perhaps, of the twentieth century.” It lives also in our weakened resistance to their ideology. “Americans are not equipped,” West notes, “not prepared, to regard anything resembling Communism… as an existential threat to liberty.” Instead, we still romanticize Moscow’s agents as “idealists” and “are continually conditioned to embrace Communistic principles, all serving to expand the power and authority of the state over the individual.” Another “measure of the success of Soviet subversion in America” is Hollywood’s complicity and support, “the near-total absence of movies that dramatize arguably the primary historical drama of the last century: the struggle – military, guerrilla, spiritual, artistic, personal – against spreading Communist totalitarianism… Not a single Hollywood film has ever shown Communists committing atrocities.”

American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation’s Character, Diana West, 2013.

DIANA WEST:

FYI. This is the history of communist and Islamic subversion that David Horowitz drove conservatives away from via what Vladimir Bukovsky called "Soviet style propaganda campaign" In 2013. #AmericanBetrayal  https://t.co/nHPOFK4KZg

— @realDianaWest (@realDianaWest) August 28, 2026

JULY 10, 2013

Host is Erick Stakelbeck.  His books.

BLAZE: FORT HOOD SHOOTER FORCED TO WEAR MILITARY UNIFORM HE SAYS REPRESENTS AN 'ENEMY OF ISLAM.'

Well the Muslim Brotherhood is already right here in our own backyards. They and their supporters have managed to infiltrate just about every level of government and they wield tremendous influence.  This has been a steady incursion aided by our own politicians and it's happened before in an almost identical manner. So just how did it happen? What's the process?  Diana West is the author of American betrayal and she joins us now to give us some insight.  Diana, welcome.

Your new book is an absolute must read it is riveting I'm losing sleep over it but I need to know the parallels you draw, Diana, where we had Soviet spies littered throughout our government halls of power and what we're seeing now with Brotherhood operatives, again in the halls of power.  In researching your book, Diana, did you find that we do not learn from the mistakes from the past, we don't learn from history?

Yes, and the reason that we don't learn from history is that we do not teach this history.  We do not know this history.  The extent of the penetration, and this is even before the Cold War, what we think of as the Cold War, the penetration began under FDR in the 1930s to a point where we had about . . . we had hundreds of American traitors working for Stalin at the highest levers of power of our government, media, and so on, and they were able to shape policy through influence.  Because Espionage is not just matters of stealing secrets.  It is influencing policy.  And the parallels today where we look at the infiltration of Muslim Brotherhood front groups, tranches of Saudi other Middle Eastern money, oil, oligarch money into our system is a huge massive influence operation and it has been stunningly successful because we have stopped talking about Jihad. We have stopped educating about Jihad, and we don't even use the word.  So this is where you see parallels to our past when we were doing the same thing with Communism.  Our government whitewashed communism during World War II just as our government in a post 9/11 era has whitewashed Islam.

An interesting point you make in the book, Diana, is that back then you were called a red baiter if you went after the Soviet agency.  Now you're called and Islamophobe.  So you had political correctness then and that really you describe in the book how it laid the groundwork for the mess we're in today, right?

Yes, exactly.  It is such a stunning parallel again because words like that are conversation enders.  They put the person who may be merely asking a question, raising a matter for further discussion, debate, thought, it puts them on the defensive.  And the way these words are used, they're used as smearing terms that end the conversation, that end all thought of the conversation.  So again these are ways to block our information to make us helpless and really to make us go forward in blindness.  So very important point, Eric.

It's amazing to me, Diana, that really the seeds for the march towards socialism we are seeing right now in this country as you lay out in the book was really kind of engineered by these Soviet agents decades ago.  Talk a bit more about how they laid the groundwork for not only political correctness but socialism and really leftist thought control.

Yes, well the leftist thought control is really our inheritance along with the socialism I mean we say we won the Cold War and yet we've got a republican majority in the Congress we can't get Republicans to defund socialized medicine and I repeat socialized medicine this is another term that we have been trained not to think of we've been trained not to think of President Obama in terms of socialist policies.  Again, we've been thought controlled not to have these very Frank natural discussions.  This is a legacy of decades of conditioning when we had this period under FDR aw where hundreds of Agents moved into positions of power they left a legacy and indeed they extended Soviet strategy right into the halls of our own power and in the book I discussed how they actually affected our strategy during World War II so that we ended up thinking that we won World War II by overthrowing a monster named Hitler.  However, we basically instated another monster, an even greater monster named Stalin, who at the end of World War II had an empire in Europe.  They basically replaced the Nazi Empire.  

And just as we have slick Islamic spokesman now in the halls of power telling our Administration "Hey, the Muslim Brotherhood are good guys.  We can deal with them.  We can work with them."  Back then, you lay out in the book how these Soviet agents of influence, and this is documented, this is not just alarmism, they were in the halls of power, Soviet agents, they were saying the same thing about Stalin, right?  "We can deal with Old Uncle Joe.  He's a good guy."