232 days on the carnivore diet, and . . .

What 232 days on the carnivore diet looks like…

Source: @carnivoreray pic.twitter.com/stqXfPDK5Z

— Dr Shawn Baker 🥩 (@SBakerMD) May 15, 2024

"Jennifer Dailey-Provost [Utah-D] went so far as to assert that we couldn’t be “experts" on the subject because we were not from Utah???"

The bill isn't asking for any special privilege, not asking ranchers to modify anything whatsoever.  No, just asking the state of Utah to mandate labeling so that the consumer can make the choice himself if he's okay with CRISPR genes or not.  It's simple: it's a consent issue.   

Presented a bill with others yesterday @PierreKory @sasha_latypova @KSChevrier sponsored by Utah Senator Trevor Lee to the Utah legislature HB0549 that would require labeling of meat that had received genetic vaccines, so the people of Utah could choose while the risks of…

— Dr. Janci (@JanciToxDoc) February 24, 2024

sponsored by Utah Senator, Trevor Lee, to the Utah legislature HB0549 that would require labeling of meat that had received genetic vaccines, so the people of Utah [can] choose [if they want to take on] the risks of inadvertent secondary transfection using this technology to consumers, meat handlers and the environment are still being investigated.

Paid pharma shills for big AG came out in force and blatantly lied or asserted safety with no proof of such, in defense of not requiring labels. Jennifer Dailey-Provost [Rep.-D] went so far as to assert that we couldn’t be “experts" on the subject because we were not from Utah??? while deferring to FDA experts amongst other idiocy that had no basis in science! I hear she is a physician. It was an embarrassing show of paid influence with not one “against” referring to human health risk or risk to the environment, but only the money it would cost and ‘meat hesitancy’— if you can believe it and the hurdles this would require.

This bill was about requiring LABELS!!! People have the right to know whether they are working with or ingesting secondarily genetic vaccines which may still have transfection potential—-i.e., may cause the consumer to produce the antigen like spike protein or other viral or bacterial foreign antigen, or are at risk for DNA integration from the agent. The risks range from oncogenic [cancer-causing] risk from insertional mutagenesis to the uncontrolled production of antigens and “off target” proteins from using modMRNA and plasmids and autoimmune effects to neurological consequences and cardiac harm to passing these on to offspring with unknown consequence!

Meat handlers could be exposed to untold amounts of transfective agents and proteins which could pose a health risk.

Bacteria in the soil and animals up the food chain are exposed from fecal material and urine and farm waste.

Farm handlers are exposed through shedding of the gene therapies and direct contact with large amounts of the transfective agents directly.

There are hundreds of these gene therapies that have now been approved for use in the animals we ingest.

This must be investigated!!!

from Frontiers . . . 

a lot of focus on fiber because carbohydrate-rich diets are the natural diets of mice and those are the animals typically used for microbiome research to study physiology

The metabolic flexibility of the gut.  There's been a lot of focus on fiber because carbohydrate-rich diets are the natural diets of mice and those are the animals typically used for microbiome research to study physiology.  

Her name is Dr. Lucy Mailing.

In the attached clip, microbiome researcher Dr. Lucy Mailing explains why fiber isn't the end all be all when it comes to gut health. So fiber is often over hyped, for example, by doctors like @DavidPerlmutter Cc. @DrRagnar @SBakerMD @KenDBerryMD @FoodLiesOrg @bigfatsurprise pic.twitter.com/XHoRahWTpZ

— REGENETARIANISM (@REGENETARIANISM) October 26, 2023

Hunter-gatherer tribes eat a lot of fruit and really fibrous starchy tubers when there isn't meat or honey or fruit available.  It's more of a fallback food for them.  The research also didn't figure in all the soil microbes when they're eating.  The research got really zeroed in on the fiber and followed that.  That's not to say that adding fiber . . . does help with their symptoms.  Let's not assume that adding fiber is right for everyone.  Sonbergs did a really great study where they had people increase their fiber consumption or increase their fermented foods and fiber did nothing for gut diversity, but increasing their fermented DID INCREASE their gut diversity.  Even more so, fermented food consumption had universal anti-inflammatory factors across all the subjects.  Those were healthy individuals, so it's not to say that everyone with a gut issue is going to respond well to fermented foods.  Yeah, so I think the hype around fiber needs to be tempered a little bit.

 

MEAT IS THE BEST FOOD ON THE PLANET. YOUR SMALL INTESTINE TRAPS AND ABSORBS MEAT.

MEAT IS THE BEST FOOD ON THE PLANET. YOUR SMALL INTESTINE TRAPS AND ABSORBS MEAT.

EITHER MEAT IS REALLY GOOD FOR US OR GOD MADE A STUPID SMALL INTESTINE

Khan Signs Up Londoners for 'Planetary Health Diet' by 2030 With Meat Cut to WW2 Levels of 44g a Day https://t.co/oVwFEK25Ot

— Dr. Urso (@richardursomd) October 18, 2023