Showing posts with label Meat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Meat. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

SAMA HOOLE: Milo of Croton, six-time Olympic wrestling champion: Documented eating 20 pounds of meat daily during training. Whether exact or exaggerated, the emphasis is clear: Massive meat consumption.

Ancient Greek Olympic athletes followed specific training diets. These weren't secret. These were documented by physicians and trainers. The Olympic training diet: Meat. Primarily meat. Heavy on meat. Specifically: Beef, pork, goat, fish. Cheese, figs for quick energy. Wine diluted with water. Grain consumption: Minimal. Some bread, but not the focus. Milo of Croton, six-time Olympic wrestling champion: Documented eating 20 pounds of meat daily during training. Whether exact or exaggerated, the emphasis is clear: Massive meat consumption. Other documented champion athletes: Similar patterns. Meat-heavy training diets. The Greeks weren't guessing. They observed: Athletes on meat-heavy diets performed better than athletes on grain-heavy diets. They didn't have studies. They had outcomes. Champions ate meat. Losers ate less meat. Roman gladiators by contrast: Fed grain porridge intentionally. Called "barley men." Not because it was optimal. Because it was cheap and fattened them for spectacle. Olympic athletes: Fed meat because performance mattered. Gladiators: Fed grain because cost mattered and performance was secondary to appearance. Same empire. Different objectives. Different nutrition. Medieval knights in training: Meat-heavy diets documented in household records. Not for taste. For building strength and maintaining combat capacity. Modern Olympic athletes: Many still gravitate toward meat-heavy diets despite modern nutritional advice suggesting otherwise. Why? Because when performance is measured objectively, meat works. You can theorise about plant-based athletic performance. Then you measure actual outcomes. Champions across history: Ate meat. The pattern is consistent across cultures and time periods. When physical performance is the goal, meat is the solution. Ancient trainers didn't know about protein synthesis, amino acid profiles, or bioavailability. They knew: Feed athletes meat, they win. Feed them grain, they lose. That was sufficient. Modern sports nutrition rediscovered what ancient trainers knew: Meat builds strength. They just had to dress it up in scientific language to make it sound like a new discovery.

Saturday, August 30, 2025

SAMA HOOLE: Plants come with oxalates, phytates, lectins, goitrogens, and other antinutrients. Cows turn that mess into steak.⠀

Vegetables are much easier to digest… once a cow has eaten them first.⠀
Cows have 4 stomachs designed to ferment cellulose, neutralise plant toxins, and convert low-value forage into high-quality nutrients.⠀
You have one stomach. No fermentation chamber. No multi-hour rumination cycle. Just a front-row seat to bloating if you try to digest raw spinach solo.⠀
Plants come with oxalates, phytates, lectins, goitrogens, and other antinutrients. Cows turn that mess into steak.⠀
You’re not meant to graze.⠀
You’re meant to eat the grazers.⠀
Let the ruminants do the plant processing.⠀

You just enjoy the upgrade. 

Saturday, February 24, 2024

"Jennifer Dailey-Provost [Utah-D] went so far as to assert that we couldn’t be “experts" on the subject because we were not from Utah???"

The bill isn't asking for any special privilege, not asking ranchers to modify anything whatsoever.  No, just asking the state of Utah to mandate labeling so that the consumer can make the choice himself if he's okay with CRISPR genes or not.  It's simple: it's a consent issue.   

sponsored by Utah Senator, Trevor Lee, to the Utah legislature HB0549 that would require labeling of meat that had received genetic vaccines, so the people of Utah [can] choose [if they want to take on] the risks of inadvertent secondary transfection using this technology to consumers, meat handlers and the environment are still being investigated.

Paid pharma shills for big AG came out in force and blatantly lied or asserted safety with no proof of such, in defense of not requiring labels. Jennifer Dailey-Provost [Rep.-D] went so far as to assert that we couldn’t be “experts" on the subject because we were not from Utah??? while deferring to FDA experts amongst other idiocy that had no basis in science! I hear she is a physician. 🤦‍♀️ It was an embarrassing show of paid influence with not one “against” referring to human health risk or risk to the environment, but only the money it would cost and ‘meat hesitancy’— if you can believe it and the hurdles this would require.

This bill was about requiring LABELS!!! People have the right to know whether they are working with or ingesting secondarily genetic vaccines which may still have transfection potential—-i.e., may cause the consumer to produce the antigen like spike protein or other viral or bacterial foreign antigen, or are at risk for DNA integration from the agent. The risks range from oncogenic [cancer-causing] risk from insertional mutagenesis to the uncontrolled production of antigens and “off target” proteins from using modMRNA and plasmids and autoimmune effects to neurological consequences and cardiac harm to passing these on to offspring with unknown consequence!

Meat handlers could be exposed to untold amounts of transfective agents and proteins which could pose a health risk.

Bacteria in the soil and animals up the food chain are exposed from fecal material and urine and farm waste.

Farm handlers are exposed through shedding of the gene therapies and direct contact with large amounts of the transfective agents directly.

There are hundreds of these gene therapies that have now been approved for use in the animals we ingest.

This must be investigated!!!

from Frontiers . . . 

Thursday, October 26, 2023

a lot of focus on fiber because carbohydrate-rich diets are the natural diets of mice and those are the animals typically used for microbiome research to study physiology

The metabolic flexibility of the gut.  There's been a lot of focus on fiber because carbohydrate-rich diets are the natural diets of mice and those are the animals typically used for microbiome research to study physiology.  

Her name is Dr. Lucy Mailing.

Hunter-gatherer tribes eat a lot of fruit and really fibrous starchy tubers when there isn't meat or honey or fruit available.  It's more of a fallback food for them.  The research also didn't figure in all the soil microbes when they're eating.  The research got really zeroed in on the fiber and followed that.  That's not to say that adding fiber . . . does help with their symptoms.  Let's not assume that adding fiber is right for everyone.  Sonbergs did a really great study where they had people increase their fiber consumption or increase their fermented foods and fiber did nothing for gut diversity, but increasing their fermented DID INCREASE their gut diversity.  Even more so, fermented food consumption had universal anti-inflammatory factors across all the subjects.  Those were healthy individuals, so it's not to say that everyone with a gut issue is going to respond well to fermented foods.  Yeah, so I think the hype around fiber needs to be tempered a little bit.

 

Sunday, October 22, 2023

MEAT IS THE BEST FOOD ON THE PLANET. YOUR SMALL INTESTINE TRAPS AND ABSORBS MEAT.