Here's how you know Sasha is correct—

Ask yourself this question: Have any of these lawsuits done f*ck-all to stop or even slow down Pfizer, Moderna, or any other pharma shill company from spamming the bioweapon injections on the American people?

(No. They haven't.) https://t.co/aY1YhbD3g2

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) February 9, 2025

So far, unfortunately, only fake civil charges have been brought by the Attorney General of Texas and the Attorney General of Kansas.  They are being operated as if it's a heroic act of suing Pfizer in Kansas and Texas.  But I have written an extensive analysis of these cases.  They're just fundraising exercises the Texas one already has been dismissed and the Kansas case will be dismissed also.

00:26.  And, I think, I'm going to add to that, Sasha.  Any approach to this that does not acknowledge the public-private partnership aspect of it, if you are just going after Pfizer, or if you're just going after Fauci, then you're not actually going after the entity or the entities that were in charge, and you're actually kind of obscuring, either intentionally or not intentionally, what actually you have.

00:50.  and often helping to solidify the bad law.  Often in these, most of the cases have been going after Pfizer claiming the product a liability, claiming as if it's a regulated product.  Now, of course, the government is lying that it's saying that it's in a regulated product so you could go under this Theory but is all designed to fail and it's all designed to just solidify the fact that all of this the government has the right to do all this and they can protect Pfizer in this situation

TOM RENZ: My family uses Costco a lot and the fact that they are poisoning their “organic” beef with “vaccines” is both misleading and horrific.

This is a big deal for me. My family uses Costco a lot and the fact that they are poisoning their “organic” beef with “vaccines” is both misleading and horrific. BTW - did you know that there is an exemption to the Organic Food Act that allows meat to be labeled organic even if… https://t.co/r7DjKSy4DV

— Tom Renz (@RenzTom) February 9, 2025

Eww gross, Costco!

Save the BEEF! @modernTman https://t.co/A6hvTqBjDa pic.twitter.com/VTdTCkbbOd

— Brook Jackson 💜 (@IamBrookJackson) February 9, 2025

United States v. Sperry Corp. (1989): The Supreme Court treated money as private property under the Takings Clause of the 5th Amendment, saying that "Money is property; it is not merely a medium of…

United States v. Sperry Corp. (1989): The Supreme Court treated money as private property under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. It analyzed whether a fee on tribunal awards was an unconstitutional taking, stating, "Money is property; it is not merely a medium of…

— SPC Smith (Ret) (@MrKanehboz) February 9, 2025

POLLY ST GEORGE: Before they expanded government control, the Bolsheviks first closed several government departments. Nazis didn't shut down any departments, instead replacing leadership & gradually changing policies.

Before they expanded government control, the Bolsheviks first closed several government departments.
Bureaucrats were either fired or reassigned if deemed useful.
By contrast the Nazis didn't shut down any departments, instead replacing leadership & gradually changing policies. pic.twitter.com/eA7sETR94h

— Polly St George aka Amazing Polly (@FringeViews) February 9, 2025

DEBBIE LERMAN: What was the origin, not of the virus, what was the origin of the response, because the origin of the response is what destroyed the world.

06:26  and I'm going to jump in Sasha, because I think we might differ here.  I don't know what it was and I think the point that we're making in the dossier is that it doesn't matter . . . what the trigger was . . . so the fact that everybody's focused on whether it was from a Pangolin or a raccoon dog or the Wuhan lab, it's not beside the point, it's an interesting question, but it is not what destroyed the world.  What destroyed the world was the lockdowns and the vaccine mandates.  That's what destroyed the world, and so what we're asking people to do is re-focus.  What was the origin, not of the virus, what was the origin of the response, because the origin of the response is what destroyed the world. 

11:00.  Sasha and I agree on all of the global control issues, and I think the important thing to realize here is that, for me, it's more structural and systemic that they were trying to use COVID-19 to kill people because I think if they were trying to use COVID-19 to kill people, it didn't do that great of job, or the vaccines, or the so-called whatever, the MRNA technology was.  I don't think it did a good enough job for that to be the justification.  It might have been.  I'm open to that interpretation.  IMO, the global structures that have been put in place and that have been growing and growing and growing especially since 9/11 and since the fall of communism, which are these supranational corporate public-private Partnerships that really pretty much controlling everything right now in the world because National governments don't have too much power anymore.  And the one that is in charge of military bio defense, so responding to biological whatever, is huge.  It's an enormous International Global conglomerate that includes pharmaceutical companies, Global pharmaceutical companies and all their subsidiaries.  So just think about how many tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, of people already are just employed in that.  Then we have all the academic institutions and the journals and the governmental agencies that are in charge of those things, and it becomes a "too big to fail" entity.  That's how I think of it, it's a "too big to fail" entity, and so if there is no outbreak and there is no biowarfare bio-terrorism, they have to . . .  something has to happen to justify their existence.

12:46.  So the evidence of this consortium were included.