Their weapons are 1) informational, that's the propaganda piece and the censorship piece, 2) psychological, that's the fear and terrorism piece, telling people they need to be afraid all the time and need to listen to the government, and 3) the third piece is the chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons which are called in their campaign pharmaceuticals, vaccines but are actually toxins and pathogens.
World Health Organization, W.H.O., which is not a health organization, it's a military organization. It's sort of the military arm of the One World Government that they're trying to set up.
Be sure to listen and read/see the 8:47 mark.
On January 24, 2023, a press conference took place to discuss the ongoing military deployment of bioweapons. One of the attendees was Katherine Watt, a Pennsylvania paralegal and law researcher. Here are her findings in her own words.
Public health has been militarized, and the military has been turned into a public health front or a Potemkin Village such that they are using public health language and public health laws to actually carry out a military campaign. And I would not call them DoD vaccines; I would call them DoD weapons. They call it a Kill Box because the first lead that I had was Todd Callender's January 30, 2022 interview with Tuscon, Arizona doctor, Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet. FYI, a kill box is a weaponry term that refers to "a three-dimensional target area, defined to facilitate the integration of coordinated joint weapons fire." A military term for defining geographical space, or three-dimensional area, for a military attack by air and by surface to kill people who are in it, and to dismantle the framework and move onto the next campaign.
She's referring to this interview here:
Watt continues,
The DOD and the World Health Organization intend to do, and have gotten quite far in doing but not quite reached their goals, is to set up the entire world as their geographic terrain, their target population as all the people in the world. The duration of their campaign is permanent. Their weapons are 1) informational, that's the propaganda piece and the censorship piece, 2) psychological, that's the fear and terrorism piece, telling people they need to be afraid all the time and need to listen to the government, and 3) the third piece is the chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons which are called in their campaign pharmaceuticals, vaccines but are actually toxins and pathogens. So I started . . . after I heard that interview, I'd already been wondering what was going on but I started trying to track down some of the things that Todd Callender talked about in his interview, and figure out what the legal frameworks were, and how they were set up, and what the financial mechanisms and coercions were. My finding, and what many other people have found from various other angles, was that this project was going on for centuries. Basically, globalists, central bankers, and lots of related organizations trying to get complete control of human beings through banking programs and military programs. And they kicked it into higher gear in 1913 with the Federal Reserve Act. And then they kicked the public health aspect of it into higher gear starting in the 1930s and 1940s. Before the 1960s, they mostly did it through orchestrated armed conflicts and financial depressions, and wars, which are very loud and messy, and destructive to infrastructure, and it makes it difficult for them to have plausible deniability and legal impunity for what they're doing. So, in the mid-1960s, they got much better at inducing suicide and homicide by fraudulently labeling poisons as medicines as vaccines, or prophylactics, and telling people that submitting to that poisoning process was their civic duty. We saw that in COVID with shorthand for "Do this or you're going to kill your grandma." And the way that the pharmaceutical method is really useful to them is that plausible deniability is much easier, and legal impunity is a lot easier. They can achieve the same goal of killing lots of people without their fingerprints being all over it.
4:05 I looked into the coercion cascades, mostly financial. Not going to go into a lot of detail with that, but it starts at the top with the Bank of International Settlements. And they can use their control of other federal central banks' access to financial systems, and then all the way down through state governments, national governments, local municipalities, school districts, hospitals, everything. If you comply with what they're telling you as far as masking, isolating, testing yourself, and taking injections, then you will get the financial access that you will need to run your business or to have a job. And if you don't comply, they can cut your off from those [or certain] services, and so that is one of the main mechanisms through which the whole thing was carried out.
4:57 And then on the legal side, at my website I do trace it back farther, but I am going to start at 1969 just for the sake of starting somewhere. The U.S. Congress passed a law to set up the chemical and biological warfare program, and in that law, which is 50USC Chapter 32, there are very important, key terms included "protective," "prophylactic," and "defensive," which is how they justify doing it. They're using those words because the international community of ordinary, non-insane people, was concerned about biological and chemical weapons and they were working on international treaties to prohibit them. And so they needed to build in loopholes, and the loopholes they built in were not going to do biological research and weapons development except for "protective" or "prophylactic" or "defensive purposes," and that's a false characterization because all biologically active products are intrinsically aggressive and toxic and lethal, and that's where we get this . . . that's the thing that disciplines like toxicology, pharmacokinetics, genotoxicity, drug-drug interactions are all related to that fact that everything that goes into the human body or any living body can have some effects which can be toxic. So that is the way they tried to get around that. And then the foundational public health emergencies platform came out in 1983 when Congress passed the Public Health Service Act Amendment that set up the Public Health Emergency Program under the 1944 law that originally set up the public health service which is a branch of the military. And also, in 1983, Congress and Reagan set up a $30 million slush fund and that has continued. It has a different name now than it did then. Still being funded as recently as the NDAA Consolidated Appropriations Act in December 2022.
6:56 The other thing they did in the 1980s was set up the 1986 was the National Vaccine Program and National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. And that's the one that set up the liability exemption for manufacturers and funneled anyone who was injured by a vaccine into this different compensation program that's been used as the model since COVID started for the countermeasures injury compensation program.
7:25 So, the international piece, the cornerstone, is The World Health Organization, W.H.O., which is not a health organization, it's a military organization because of this merger that I am talking about. It's sort of the military arm of the One World Government that they're trying to set up. And they did a set of amendments to the international health regulations, IHRs, in 2005 that entered into force in June 2007 that basically the IHR, which are currently going through another round of amendments to make them worse, called on national governments to make their own domestic laws and fund more programs for surveillance, testing, detention and quarantine, physical control, enforced treatment during international outbreaks of communicable diseases. And the pretext that they used because it was bankers who were doing this, was that they needed to protect international trade from disruptions caused by disease outbreaks but the real intent was to set up these legal systems that transfer sovereign government from the nation-state to The World Health Organization and the BIS automatically when a public health emergency of international concerned has been declared. And Congress, U.S. presidents, and the Cabinet comply with that demand from the World Health Organization.
8:47 So, two of the key years were 1997 and 1998. That was when the beginnings of the Emergency Use Authorization was set up. And when they transferred the CBDR weapons classifications from the DOD to HHS or CDC [chemical/biological/radiological/nuclear] classification and control. It was the same products, as far as I can tell, and it was just a relabeling and a rehoming of the Department of Defense to Health and Human Services.
9:23 The EUA was kind of a two-step process. At the time, the public was really upset about the use of unapproved vaccines for anthrax on military troops and the horrible adverse effects they were having. So Congress passed a law in November to revoke authorization for testing or using unapproved products on military troops. But three days later, in a different law, another law allowing for vaccinating the general population with unapproved products was passed. But the target population would be expanded from just military troops to the entire population. Then around 2000 to 2002, using the momentum from the 9/11 and the anthrax attacks on Congress, they set up through the statutes again, program management, sort of, structures. They did that through the
2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force. And people talked about this at the time. It was construed as putting the country into a permanent state of war, the global war on terror with every other country in the world, so there was no geographic limitation, there was no time limitation. No identified enemy other than "terror." And through than "terror." And through that, and I think people figured this out at the time but it got suppressed/censored, it made everyone in the world a presumptive combatant. Or an enemy target. So it was essentially a de facto covert, global martial law act by the U.S. government.
11:00 And in the early 2000s, we also got the PATRIOT Act, 2001, the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act, and the Homeland Security Act, and those were more of the merging of the DHS, the DOJ, the HHS, the DOD, all of the cabinet agencies. So since then, 2003-2009, there've been lots of executive orders, [shoring up international and military guidelines on a local level], lots more statutes and appropriations, lots of agency regulations, guidance reports, that were circulated to state, local, and tribal authorities and law enforcement so that they would know that under a public health emergency that the local police are subordinated to the federal military. FDA issued a lot of guidance-to-industry documents and sent those out to the pharmaceuticals and academic organizations. [FDA communicated with corporate and academic interests to alert them on how to handle experimental products being coerced on the public.] and NGOs to let them know about how FDA is going to handle experimental products like vaccines, gene therapies, biologics, and they did more test-runs, like 2003 SARS, 2006 MERS, 2009 H1N1. That brings up to the Other Transactions Authority, OTA, as was revealed through Pfizer's April 2022 motion to dismiss whistleblower, Brook Jackson's False Claims Act case. They said, "This was not a vaccine. It was a DOD prototype, and we were never obligated to do valid clinical trials. We were never obligated to prove safety or efficacy to anyone. We never had to get FDA authorization through any of the normal guidance to industry channels because it was a prototype. Pfizer stated prototypes are not required to go through safety and efficacy testing or clinical trials or FDA authorization.
October 4, 2022, the U.S. government filed a statement of interest in support of Pfizer's motion to dismiss the claim that they were acting outside standard regulatory practices when it comes to vaccine distribution.
Basically saying that clinical trials were never material or necessary for DOD to pay the contractors for producing or distributing the bioweapons known as COVID-19 vaccines. And so all of this became visible from 2020 to the present when the W.H.O. President, Secretary General issued the Public Health Emergency of International Concern at the end of January 2020 and the HHS Secretary immediately triggered the domestic framework through the determination that a public health emergency exists, followed by PREP Act declarations for medical countermeasures, which are the weapons [the vaccines].
Health & Human Services Violates existing U.S. Law by stating that a public health emergency exists.
And then Congress and presidents, Trump and Biden, pass several additional Congressional acts and funding, reinforcing the structure of the kill box.
Trump and Biden passed declarations, acts, and legislation and opened up a funding stream reinforcing and incentivizing the kill box.
And issued more executive orders under the Defense Production Act, the Stafford Act, and the National Emergencies Act to sort of build out the program. Basically what it built was a huge private/public funding stream for military bioweapons research and use. It eliminated informed consent by reclassifying people who could be potentially carrying disease as presumptive national security threats so that you can do anything you want to them because you're on a war footing.
private/public funding stream for military-led experiments on humans.
Who knew? We are under martial law.
eliminated informed consent by reclassifying healthy humans as biohazards or threats to national security.
But how is national security even a thing anymore if the W.H.O., an international entity is enforcing these measures? Because the sovereign countries adopt these measures per the W.H.O.
State of Emergency is considered a war footing.
By whom?
Under current "legal" framework supported by continuation of emergency declarations all liability for private interests and government harms is shielded from investigation or prosecution.
Gee, how do Rand Paul and Thomas Renz, and Dr. Richard Fleming get around this one?
And to shield products and weapons from product liability, to shield all the people involved from criminal liability and from civil liability, and to shield the government funders, developers, and regulators from criminal prosecution under the other . . . that are in place, that are superseded by this framework for use of bioweapons, for use of chemical weapons, terrorism, things like that.
I see this as a joint project between the U.S. Department of Defense, the coordinating committee of the Central Banks, W.H.O., and BIS. And the U.N., but the World Health Organization is like a subsidiary of the UN.
And, there are things that globalists do not like. They don't like constitutions, the charters. They don't like the conflicting statutory frameworks around war crimes, bioterrorism, torture, . . . They don't like any of that stuff. They don't like when states or provinces, counties or towns pass their own laws protecting informed consent, protecting people for their continued safety. They actually put out a report in October 2022: state laws limiting public health protections hazardous for our health. And there's a whole bunch of things that states have started doing that globalists do not like, so doing more of those things, bringing more control back to the states, using more of Article 10 of the Constitution to reclaim state authority . . . those are all extremely useful. I do think it's going to break. I do think there's going to be a tipping point and the criminal prosecutions are going to start. And we have all the evidence, and every time they try to answer what we're talking about by saying "national security," they reinforce this is the right way to go. This is what they're doing: they're committing war crimes.
