What would life be like if you were not in the Bill Gates dystopian control grid? The Amish are a living example of this. They don't use technology. They use very few pharmaceuticals. They grow and eat their own food. Their kids go to their own homeschool systems. They stay within their own church.

Why is big government trying to shut down #amosmiller, a 5th-generation Amish farmer with zero complaints in 25 years? Big tech and pharma! The Amish way threatens their control.

Makes you think, doesn’t it?

Watch the full interview: https://t.co/CSQWfcNWzE pic.twitter.com/Z42I0RaOxU

— Rebel Capitalist Pro (@RebelCapPro) June 17, 2024

ZEROHEDGE: California Reveals All Job Gains In 2023 Were Fake

Strange how the media completely ignored the story that all California job gains in 2023 were fake.  https://t.co/0PeYbBngCk

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) July 2, 2024

ROBERT BARNES: "There is no Constitutional integrity without election integrity, and that is why election integrity must be a civil right"

"Election Integrity, the Civil Rights Issue of Our Time," Robert Barnes

One citizen, one vote. 

An honest vote honestly counted. 

"If the glove don't fit, you must acquit"

Thank you to Charles Burris's article, "Attorney Robert Barnes: Did OJ Simpson Really Do It?" @ Lew Rockwell.  

Not only is Robert Barnes a master litigator and top-notch attorney, but he is one of the nation's most in-depth, articulate, well-read, and street-smart experienced political analysts. Whether it involves the institutionalized criminal machine cartels of the Democrats and Republicans or the deep state, he is a true polymath reminiscent of Murray N. Rothbard in his power elite analysis of Realpolitik.

This weekend in Las Vegas there is a massive celebratory event with enthusiastic people and well-wishers gathered from across the country to commemorate Robert Barnes's 50th birthday and help raise funds for the 1776 Law Center.

1776 Law Center helps those who cannot afford counsel and public advocates to obtain capable, competent counsel and public advocates, especially when their case broadly impacts the liberties of all Americans in the freedom to what we put in our bodies, our defense of self, free elections, and financial empowerment.

Political Freedom, Food Freedom, Medical Freedom, and Financial Freedom. 

POLITICAL FREEDOM

Political Freedom encompasses free speech, self-defense, government transparency, and honest elections. 

FOOD FREEDOM

Food Freedom covers both the right to choose what goes into your body and the right of farmers to farm their land the way they know to make it the best food we can eat.

MEDICAL FREEDOM

Medical Freedom encompasses the right to bodily autonomy, the right to informed consent, and the right to say no to an unwanted drug or vaccine. 

FINANCIAL FREEDOM

Financial Freedom protects against woke banks, central bank digital currencies, tax authority misbehavior, social credit score systems, transparency to the central bankers, and access to capital and tools like alternative currencies, crypto, bitcoin, cancel-free payment processors, and opposition to taxation as confiscation and control. 

WHO HAS 1776 LAW CENTER SUPPORTED? 

From the Covington kids to Kyle Rittenhouse, from employer mandates to Brook Jackson, from Amish farmer Amos Miller to Children’s Health Defense, from election challenges to suits against The Federal Reserve, 1776 Law Center fills a critical gap of legal need and public advocacy. Your help is critical to making that a reality. 

ROBERT BARNES: Yeah, instead of grabbing pussies, he's become one

🔥WATCH THIS NOW—entire episode is full of in your face truth that some folks just can handle! Don’t get triggered. Just tell a friend what’s up.

“You don’t always criticize people you hate. Sometimes you criticize people you love because you want to make them better!”—VivaFrei https://t.co/HwMc9Am96u pic.twitter.com/Kd2bcAygoM

— Brook Jackson 💜 (@IamBrookJackson) March 18, 2024

Take Boeing.  Do you know who Boeing implicates?  The person he's right now considering for Vice President.  Scott is neck-deep in Boeing.  The whole South Carolina political hierarchy--Nikki Haley, Lindsay Graham, they're all neck-deep in Boeing.  And Tim Scott especially.  Tim Scott has written special legislation just for Boeing.  My guess is that's why Trump is keeping his mouth shut.  Trump right now seems scared.  Scared to say things about the FBI, about the CIA, about the NSA, about the US Agriculture Department, about the FDA, about the CDC, about any of these people.  It's glaring when the other day you see Robert Kennedy talking about it, and Trump not day after day after day after day.  

Narcissists are less likely to take advice. "Don't tell me what to do!"

As narcissism is related to underestimating others, we further assumed that the expertise of the advisor moderates the association between narcissism and advice-taking.  Anna-Katharina Stöcker @ Science Direct

Meta-analysis: Narcissists are less likely to take advice. https://t.co/pHxqe28AMw pic.twitter.com/fXGMFSN6lU

— Rolf Degen (@DegenRolf) March 16, 2024

"You can strip Americans of all civil rights and civil liberties without constitutional protection as long as the president calls them an "enemy combatant."

they didn't just sue the Trump organization, they sued Trump and his kids who had nothing to do with this. Eric Trump is part of this judgment. Donald, Jr. was part of the judgment, and they knew his kids had nothing to do with it. It's pure retaliation. --Robert Barnes

A breakdown of the absurdity coming out of New York from last night's stream. https://t.co/AWsz2752eO pic.twitter.com/2WLMxtkPGy

— Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) October 2, 2023

Dangerous state laws that linger on the books give the state the right to bring suit without any finding that itself has ever been defrauded.  It shows you what a joke the standing Doctrine is I mean they don't let the vaccine-injured sue because somehow they don't have standing.  Not just the immunity laws but even the FDA says, you know, you don't have standing. But if you've not been defrauded pending nickel, dime, or dollar; you have no complaining victim; the state has lost no money; in fact, they have gained money; then you get to sue and destroy somebody's business? Two aspects.  Second aspect is that they didn't just sue the Trump organization, they sued Trump and his kids who had nothing to do with this.  Eric Trump is part of this judgment.  Donald, Jr. was part of the judgment, and they knew his kids had nothing to do with it.  It's pure retaliation.  As Carl Benjamin said, Sargon of Akkad, part of the Lotus Eaters podcast when he was on Tim Pool, said, "We don't have a country anymore.  You're fighting over what the scraps are going to be."  But when you have the open overt weaponization, where you're locking up your political opponents, where you're locking up the leading presidential candidate or trying to, and you're destroying his business, literally based on nothing at all, then you don't have a country, you don't have a rule of law.

So this corrupt political hack of a judge shouldn't have presided over the case, to begin with; the case should have been transferred to the commercial division.  He refused because he's a rogue partisan hack.  And there are a lot of corrupt judges in New York.  Probably per capita, the king of corrupt judges in America is in New York.  A close second is the District of Columbia. If you wonder why the prosecutors are so corrupt in both jurisdictions read Billy Waters's book The Gambler. About his experiences with the southern district of New York, he said he underestimated just how corrupt they were.  He dealt with corrupt government officials his whole life, but he says it's nothing like what you see in the southern district of New York because the judges are in on it in New York.  The judges are in on it in the District of Columbia. So the case has no grounds whatsoever, no legal factual grounds whatsoever. The problem is the statute that even exists that allows the state of New York to just go steal people's business whenever they feel like it, and just say "We feel like we've been defrauded" even if you haven't been defrauded.  You can't prove a penny, nickel, dime, or dollar fraud ever happened.  The idea that the world's most sophisticated banks lent money without knowing the value of the Trump brand is utterly preposterous.  They could not have been defrauded, they never claim to have been defrauded, not an attempt to be defrauded, not in existence because they would have had to have their own . . . these were massive deals.  They would have had their own independent appraisers, their own independent brand assessors,

5:35. Don't the banks in the Trump case need to affirm their appraisal approvals?  Won't the judge have to go after them as co-conspirators to make the bogus charge stick or will the lawfare . . . ?

5:48. Yeah because they're the so-called victim.  You can't allege that the victim is in on it. That's why it's levels of absurdity that all of these cases are . . . what we're seeing is how dangerous the legal system is when it's weaponized by people for political and partisan objectives.  And the question is, is a Supreme Court going to be asleep while the country collapses, or is it at some point going to wake up and step in because these trial courts don't recognize these limits.  They're used to abusing their power; they're used to misusing their power; prosecutors are used to misusing their power, quite frankly, due to a lot of Republican judges over the past five decades, who have completely covered up for corrupt prosecutors.  The leading people doing so have been Republican judges sadly.  I have a case about to go up to the Supreme Court and petition for cert out of the 7th circuit where they created an exception that said, 

one, you're not allowed to go into somebody's house to arrest them for a misdemeanor.  So what you do is you just grab them and throw them out of the house . . .

. . . and do the magic, the rule doesn't apply anymore to these three Republican 7th Circuit corrupt judges who think they're going to be up on the Supreme Court.  I say corrupt because they're corrupt for partisan purposes, not quid pro quo corruption.  The second component is that it's part of a case I have for the 10th Circuit it's okay to shoot somebody dead, tase them, or beat them as long as they're not yet arrested.  So that's not excessive force, because you only have a right against excessive force according to these conservative judges if you're actually in custody; until then, we can beat you, shoot you, and this absurdity has come out of the conservative wing of the legal Academy.  So now we're seeing, you know, when you greenlight abuse for prosecutors, greenlight abuse for the police,  greenlight abuse, . . . you know that judge was going to be on the U.S. Supreme Court that was buddies with Pence that was out saying to take Trump off the ballot, he was a big right-wing Federalist Society judge . . . 

Was that Lawrence Tribe?

No, Tribe is the commie.  This is his buddy from the 4th Circuit.  This is a guy who said "You can strip Americans of all civil rights and civil liberties without constitutional protection as long as the president calls them an "enemy combatant."  There were a bunch of right-wingers there going, "Woo-hoo!!"  Ben Shapiro was Woo-hoo!!" cheerleading that kind of nonsense.  I mean you don't have to follow Matt Walsh, Michael Knowles, or a lot of them, Jeremy Boreing, well-named, Boreing, to realize their authoritarian tendencies; their fascistic proclivities, quite frankly, are barely under the surface. They're all excited about El Salvador's method of cracking down on crime because they think mass arrests is a wonderful thing.  They never met a prosecutor they thought was bad.  They never met a police they thought was rogue.  They never thought an executive action done during the Bush Administration was problematic, and that's why we're here.  And now the Left has overtly weaponized using that greenlight and using that open door and it's an outlandish and outrageous case against Trump.  And the reason why it shouldn't matter to everybody is that it goes way past Trump.  If they can establish this precedent, you can defraud nobody, and you could have done one of the most sophisticated business deals in the history of man, we're talking about deals in the 8 figures, deals in the 9 figures, and the idea that they didn't know . . . ?  I mean Trump had through a bankruptcy before.  You don't think the banks didn't know exactly the value of the loan, the exact value of the note to pay back that loan? That's utterly ludicrous.

Ep. 2312 The Trump Indictment, with Robert Barnes

Courts Are Prepared to Give Reparations to People from 150 Years Ago, but to Business Owners Over the Last 2 Years, Fuggedaboutit

Kim Iversen and Robert Barnes talk about the millions of small businesses that got decimated by lockdowns:

"In San Fran, they are talking about reparations for something that happened more than one hundred years ago, but what about reparations for what they just did to people in… https://t.co/3Xh3zn21qy pic.twitter.com/mzKdBcAcCJ

— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) March 10, 2023

The Article III Project with Mike Davis

Excellent. 

Mike Davis from Iowa, went to the university of Iowa for undergraduate work.  Went to law school and got involved in politics.  Interned for Speaker Newt Gingrich during Clinton's impeachment.  Went back, and started Students for George W. Bush across the state of Iowa.  Got involved very heavily in the Bush campaign.  Went to work for Chuck Grassley, my home state senator.  After I graduated, I worked in the Bush 43 Administration.  Went to Law School in Iowa, and campaigned the whole time.  Went back to the Bush 43 White House, and helped with the hiring and firing of political appointees.  That's where I met Neil Gorsuch.  Helped him get into the Justice Department.  Helped him get onto the 10th Circuit. And then he dragged me out to Colorado.  I was one of his first clerks.  Was a civil litigator in Colorado for 10 years.  Then Gorsuch dragged me back out to DC to help him get confirmed on the Supreme Court.  I was going to go back to Denver.  I had a good life there and got mired in the Swamp.  Chuck Grassley's office called me again.  They wanted me to be the Chief Counsel for nominations for Trump's first 2 years.  So we helped Trump set records for the number of judges he appointed to the bench.  And then I was going to go back to Colorado and I keep getting roped into starting these groups and doing these fights.  So I started the Article 3 Projects [find their Twitter feed here.] At the time, it was to fight to confirm President Trump's judicial nominees, now it's opposing Biden's nominees.  It's defending Constitutional judges.  Once they get to the bench, they have lifetime tenure.  They have paid protection, but they're still humans.  So I like to defend them, like Clarence Thomas when they go after him and his wife, or when they go after my old boss, Gorsuch, for killing Sonia Sotomayer with this MaskGate on the Supreme Court. 

6:40  I also started the Internet Accountability Project, which goes after Big Tech from the Right on Anti-Trust, Section 230, and data privacy.  And so I have my hands full on defending Trump on the Mar-A-Lago raid.  I am defending the rule of law.  It's a constant battle.  Unfortunately, there aren't a lot of Republicans in DC who have a backbone, so I tend to be getting into a lot of these fights solo but it's fun doing it.  

Ketanji Brown Jackson.  

When did being a victim become the highest of values in the west? CARL BENJAMIN: The U.S. Civil Rights Act, 1964.

The guest is Carl Benjamin, who Wikipedia describes as 

a British far-right anti-feminist YouTuber and political commentator. A former member of the Eurosceptic right-wing UK Independence Party, he was one of its unsuccessful candidates for the South West England constituency in the 2019 European Parliament election

This is the reason why fascism exploded as it did.  Fascism was in response to the failures of communism to overthrow the capitalism.  Now the only place it really succeeded was in Russia in 1917 with Lenin overthrowing the provisional government.  But it was the communist revolutionary who got imprisoned by the fascists, called Gramsci, Antonio Gramsci, who said that that's only happened in Russia because Russia is a deeply corrupt country where the people do not support the institutions of government.  So they didn't care if they got overthrown by a small organized minority.  And he accurately, I think, said, or pointed out in his Prison Notebooks, this is not going to happen in the west, somewhere like the United States, Canada, or England, where the institutions are by and large not corrupt and the people uphold them because the people believe the institutions are the best they're going to get and they like them and they think they're important and sustain the world that we have around us.  And so from this, you have a small group of activists in academia, in Harvard Law School, they call themselves the Critical Legal Scholars initially, but they ended up turning themselves into something called the Race Crits, the Critical Race Theorists.  This began with Dereck Bell's alternative course, where they were teaching what would come to be called The Intersectional View of Society, essentially a great expansion of Marxism out of the economic sphere into every other sphere of life.  In her earliest essays, Kimberle Crenshaw, she's the person who coined "intersectionality."  In 1989, she gives her essays these really long titles, and I can really remember, "A Black Feminist Critique of Liberal Human Rights."  In this one essay, she analyzes three particular American Supreme Court decisions, pointing out that what's happening here is that she believes, as a black woman, she has identified a problem, an absence in American Human liberal rights doctrine, which is, for example, when a pair of black women were denied a promotion in a company, a helicopter company, they were being discriminated against by the people above them, the judge ruled, for being as either women or as either black.  So a black man could be discriminated on the basis that he was black, but, of course, he had a privilege because he was a man.  A white woman could be discriminated against on the fact that she was a woman but had some sort of privilege because she was white, claiming that this was a gap in human rights law.  All intersectionality does is chain these together.  That says, what about a black woman who isn't privileged in either one of these ways but is discriminated against both of these ways.  That, in fact, she has a worse level of discrimination, and things are worse for her, and as soon as you start taking on this attitude, you realize that, oh, this is a key weakness in human liberal rights doctrine because what they're doing is staying within the paradigm and essentially warping it into something it's not intended to be.  From this, she writes an essay in 1991, called "Mapping the Margins," where she continues to expound this point of view.  This is where the intersectionality is properly formulated.  And in the conclusion of that, she says, "Look, we can use . . . in this essay, she explicitly cites Gramsci, because Gramsci's position was look, we can't overthrow capitalism in the west while society is strong enough to support its institutions.  He has a nice way of framing it, "When we attack the state and it trembles, behind it is revealed a strong fortification, or rampart, of society.  He says that it's the society itself that we actually need to overthrow [interesting distinction] in order to be able to bring about communism.  Crenshaw says that's a great point, and that we can use this weakness in liberal human rights legislation to attack society itself by promoting minoritarian interests.  And what we can do is find the intersection between being black, being woman, being gay, being trans, all the other identity categories.  And she openly postulates in the conclusion to this essay, that we can form coalitions of marginalized groups in order to strengthen that political voice and hopefully overthrow the regime of white/CIS/hetero/patriarchal norm of capitalism in order to, using their own logic, in order to hopefully bring . . . it's always very speculative, in order to "might bring about a better future."  "Might"?  Brilliant.  Such a secure way of overthrowing society.  I think this is why it's been so unbelievably quick because they're using their own internal logic.  All they do is expand the concept to mean its antonym.  Take any concept.  Racism is at once a person's opinion, which is located in yourself, and it's also objective, outside of yourself, and there's no one person who is responsible for it.  So you've got two opinions, two definitions that are openly contradictory that have been compressed into the same thing and it allows them to pivot at any point.  

When did being a victim become the highest of values in the west?  The U.S. Civil Rights Act, 1964. 

political class shifts donor control to the political class away from the candidate

Football, soccer, one of the two great things the British empire gave to the world.  BTW, you can look, you can go and see exactly where the British empire starts, where British shipping reached, where the British directly ruled they played cricket.  Where the British ships, the Navy, went they played soccer.  That's why most of the world outside the U.S. plays either soccer or cricket.  

Looking for U.S. election results, except election Day came and I didn't get the results.  Election Day, at least in the United States has turned unto Election Week.

8:40  From an elections standards, American elections are unprecedented and unparalleled historically for American but also around the globe in this sense:  How we conduct American elections would be condemned if it were the American State Dept. talking about some other country's elections.  Around the world, they do not allow mass mail-in voting; they don't allow you to mail it in.  America now does . . . in most key states, and more key jurisdictions.  In most places around the world, they count the ballots the same day as the election.  They tell you how many people voted, first, and then they count them as to who won.  Brazil just had elections.  Within 3 to 4 hours, all the votes were counted.  That's the norm around the globe.  Ah, not in America.  Nevada's elections went on for . . . they're still counting in Nevada.   

By doing this, the political class can flood places that they want or starve places that they want.  

BREAKING: GOP nominates McCarthy for House Speaker - FNC

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) November 15, 2022

No one ever tried to FOIA the Fed until after the 2008 global financial crisis

Thank you to Charles Burris @ Lew Rockwell for this discussion between George Gammon and Robert Barnes..

1:30  Robert and I moved forward, I guess instigated, a FOIA request, a campaign where I put up about $65,000 and then we did a Go-Fund-Me thing for the other $35,000 to come up with a FOIA request against the FED because we wanted to push back against the auditing that they're doing, but more specifically them completely ignoring the Federal Reserve Act in 2020.  So the way this work is that you've got to do the FOIA request first and if they tell you to pound sand long enough, then you've got to give them a deadline, you have to go ahead and sue them.  We were hoping we wouldn't have to come to the lawsuit part of it, we'd go ahead and do the request, we dot the i's, cross the t's.  It's incredibly expensive to hire an accountant to do that.  But we were hoping they'd say, "Okay, that's fine.  Here's what you requested," but I guess that's not the path they've taken.  

2:36  We started out with some basic requests, then we expanded it to a lot of detailed requests across the entire history of the Federal Reserve, so we wanted internal documentation on how they interpreted their own legal authority.  [Whoa]  How have they interpreted any limitations or restrictions or restraints on their legal authority.  How have they interpreted their authority to the income tax and various revenue acts that have passed.  The things we know that they have done some internal review on, we asked for everything that could possibly relate to that categorically.  So not just to specific items in 2020 and in past years where they took actions that appear to be outside the Federal Reserve Act but also everything they have internally talked and discussed about their own power or the limits on their own power and how it correlates with the income tax, and, of course, given that the Federal Reserve came in at the same time as the income tax, 1913.  And I've seen some documentation concerning other banks talking about what the Fed was talking about all the way back to 1915 in the New York Public Library.  So we incorporated all of that, . . . 

3:48  Hired a forensic accountant who is also a former bank auditor to say that we really want to audit the Fed, what should we ask for, so he came up with very specific requests as if he were auditing the Federal Reserve and we combined the two, submitted it, they gave us the run-around, the run-around, the run-around, and finally they said, "We have no idea what you're talking about.  We don't have indexed files here.  We don't even know how to search our own files here at the Federal Reserve.  If you could tell us exactly which day we actually did that analysis, then we can search for it.  But if you don't have the exact day and the exact time . . . ," the Fed has got away with this 

4:31  This is the game they play.  Explain that, Robert, because to the laymen, they may say, "Well, that's a legitimate claim, but no, no, this is just a game to draw this out as long as possible to make sure you're spending as much money and they're just hoping that you drag it on long enough to where you just forget about it or you run out of cash.  

4:51  It's apparent that no one has ever asked for this before.  No one ever tried to FOIA the Fed until after the 2008 global financial crisis and then some media institutions, including Bloomberg did, but they requested very specific information they already knew about in advance . . . 

5:07  And they were successful. . . 

Absolutely.  

BREAKING: After my report, Vanderbilt’s transgender clinic has deleted their entire website. Literally the whole thing. They’re removing everything.

This all seems perfectly normal https://t.co/O7I2cK27Ms

— Tom Woods (@ThomasEWoods) September 21, 2022

All because Matt Walsh asked the question, What Is a Woman?  Maybe it's a little more than that.  This should give some insight.  

 

Be sure to read this by Matt Walsh.

BREAKING: My team and I have been investigating the transgender clinic at Vanderbilt here in Nashville. Vanderbilt drugs, chemically castrates, and performs double mastectomies on minors. But it gets worse. Here is what we found. Let's start at the beginning.

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 20, 2022

"Drug companies can sue the FDA without a problem, but citizens often cannot. And we're trying to fix that."

Attorney Robert Barnes: It's Time to Empower Citizens Against Regulatory Capture

"If they're lying about this drug ... how can they trust the FDA on any other drug?"

"Drug companies can sue the FDA without a problem, but citizens often cannot. And we're trying to fix that." pic.twitter.com/zI2IDZkJne

— The Vaccinated Fox 🦊 (@VaxxedFox) July 20, 2022

ROBERT BARNES: Ron De Santis will be Trump's running mate in 2024. That agreement has already been made.

“That agreement has already been made”

Robert Barnes says Ron DeSantis will be Trump’s running mate in 2024 pic.twitter.com/LQKZxKGiZR

— Blair (@skifflegirl) July 20, 2022

Pfizer . . . [made] false statements to the government, and lie[d] about the safety and efficacy of its product, “because the government was in on it with them!”

🧵2/
In other words, Pfizer was allegedly able to make false statements to the government, and lie about the safety and efficacy of its product, “because the government was in on it with them!” according to Robert Barnes, the lead lawyer in the case.

— SurfsUpBri 🐭💜 (@SurfsUpBri) June 2, 2022

"they would have been better off with a 2nd term of Trump than what they're about to face . . ."

A rising empire doesn’t look like a Green Zone from Baghdad and doesn't have a dementia candidate for president.  That’s a sign of a declining empire, a dying empire, that knows it’s dying, and I think on some level they do, and this is when they lash out most, but I do think it’s going to trigger a backlash . . . I’ve seen it from all kinds of places.  People who weren’t even active before didn’t care about politics, so enraged by what the system is trying to do that they’re finding any way conceivable to engage.  People are starting to realize how powerful local government can be because they actually control how elections are done. They’re going to be running for little positions—city council, county commission . . . .  For a populist revolution to work, it needed always to be bottom-up.  It could never succeed top down.  And they’re forcing that to happen.  

🍿🥤 Watch this clip @ElectionWiz expects 2022 to activate the indie voters to a populist backlash
🗳️ @barnes_law says👍its a good bet and it's gonna happen

Is this that moment and does populists winning elections mean populists implement those policies?

🤔What do you think? pic.twitter.com/peEhoUtVCI

— Adam Townsend (@adamscrabble) May 16, 2022

"[It takes] more fossil fuels to do this than you’re getting benefits from it. You would have been better off burning the fossil fuels in the first place instead of playing pretend"

“The sun is renewable but the solar arrays are not. [It takes] more fossil fuels to do this than you’re getting benefits from it. You would have been better off burning the fossil fuels in the first place instead of playing pretend.” pic.twitter.com/0rJY8VSa0J

— Marty Bent (@MartyBent) April 9, 2022

ROBERT BARNES: THEY REBRANDED EUGENICS AS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH

Open up this link [which is behind a paywall], to find Episode #20, dated June 17, 2021, titled "Is There a COVID Cabal?"  Eugenics is a field in which Gates has been involved for decades.  If anybody would know how to render a population sterile, it would be Bill Gates.  Gates supports death panels. It's a return to the divine right of kings.  Eugenics is at the heart of COVID Cabal.  

You need fear to get people to forfeit liberties. Where the state is the solution as security to achieve certain objectives.  What did Gates start talking about a decade ago when he launched the Decade of Vaccines?  "Great, great concern about a coming pandemic and how we need to be prepared for that pandemic.  We need to be prepared to use unique medicines we've never used before in terms of population and social controls and need to have quickly available vaccines that have complete indemnification from liability in case they turn out to be complete crap as other prior rushed vaccines have been." Co-sponsor was the World Economic Forum, WEF's Klaus Schwab and the Great Reset.  He has promoted Bill Gates quite heavily.  Soros & Bloomberg are part of this cabal too. But Gates was clearly chosen to run and head this cabal, to be its lead advocate, proponent, and participant.  Eugenics has been rebranded as Transhumanism to use artificial intelligence and gene editing for enhanced breeding for select people.  Somebody else that Gates was attached to: Jeffrey Epstein.  Epstein's main obsession was not sex, it was technology.  He was backed by certain MIT scientist connected to Gates.  One of Gates' immunological scientists would be the back-up executor of Epstein's estate.  That's how deep these connections go.  He was building a ranch in Arizona where he wanted to impregnate 20 women a day and wanted the gene editing to go with it to enhance a genetically superior species.  His sex powers and trafficking were the result of elite power ideologies that are deeply dangerous to us as a society.  Communism is just another expression of an elite few who think the world is better off if they run our lives and deprive us of core freedoms and liberties and are always often obsessed with control: control over the population.  That's what the COVID cabal is really about.  That meeting in 2009 that was leaked to a small Irish publication--by maybe a maid, maybe a janitor, these are the heroes of the world--who leaked out that this meeting took place, what was discussed, and what it was about, who was there, and where it was going.  If you followed it and tracked it, you could've known what COVID was about from the moment it came on the scene. And that's the enemy and adversary that needs to be faced, just another version of the Nazi face but with a big tech nerd smile than with a German accent.  So if you listen to Klaus Schwab you still get the German accent part if you want that too. So there truly is evidence of a COVID cabal.