Monday, June 30, 2025

DR. SHAWN BAKER: ketogenic amino acids, like leucine and lysine . . . were inversely linked to kidney disease risk.

What if the kind of protein you eat could help protect your kidneys even if you have type 2 diabetes? Now a new study has just revealed a game-changing insight.  It's not just how much protein you eat, but what TYPES of amino acids you're feeding your body. Researchers looked at dietary patterns in adults with type 2 diabetes, and here's what they found. High total protein intake was associated with greater risk of diabetic kidney disease, BUT certain amino acids told a different story. And our ketogenic amino acids, like leucine and lysine. These specific amino acids were inversely linked to kidney disease risk.  That means that the more people consumed THEM, the lower the risk appeared to be.

Why?

Ketogenic amino acids don't flood the body with nitrogen waste the same way other proteins can, and that's a big win for the already stressed kidneys.

So what does this mean? Foods rich in ketogenic amino acids like eggs, salmon, and beef might actually protect your kidneys even on a high protein diet.  This isn't just about counting grams.  It's about understanding the profile of your protein.  

If you want to find out more, check out Revero.  We deal with the stuff all the time.  

JOHN SLAUGHTER: The females of only three species are know to go through menopause, pilot whales, orcas, and humans. The purpose of this is so that older females can contribute to the survival of their kin through leadership, knowledge, or resource sharing.

The females of only three species are know to go through menopause, pilot whales, orcas, and humans. 
 
The purpose of this is so that older females can contribute to the survival of their kin through leadership, knowledge, or resource sharing. 

The evolution of human society was facilitated in part by grandmothers. 

They improved child survival rates by helping feed, protect, and care for grandchildren.

This allowed younger mothers to have shorter gaps between births, since grandmothers helped with childcare and provisioning.

And this strengthened multi-generational cooperation. 

This meant more stable family units, better nourished and protected children, and greater group survival.  

The fact that we have reached a point where the older generations don’t feel the need to provide care for their grandchildren is another example of the rejection of unchosen bonds and an embrace of the spirit of rebellion.

GLOBAL WARMING? there's nothing weird about storms rotating around certain radar stations

BREAKING: The U.S. has collected a RECORD $121 BILLION in Tariff revenue "We are collecting A LOT of revenue" from tariffs — and we're expecting another $27 billion dollar increase for June.

Frequency Clouds, Central Florida & Indiana

MARC LANDERS: Daily cannabis use produced cognitive improvement and reduced brain inflammation in aged humans and animals.…

MARC LANDERS: Breakthrough CBD Powder Could Revolutionize Asthma Treatment – Up to 62% Lung Delivery Achieved!

Sunday, June 29, 2025

DR. C. G. R. MOUTOUX, 1905: It is a fact that persons who never had been vaccinated have acted as nurses of smallpox patients, yet did not contract the disease

Everything you thought you knew about smallpox and vaccines? This flips it upside down.
“It is a fact that persons who never had been vaccinated have acted as nurses of smallpox patients, yet did not contract the disease; while others who had been successfully vaccinated did contract it, in such a malignant form as to lose their lives. Many persons not vaccinated at all have escaped the disease, although belonging to the same family as those afflicted, and attending them while sick; which proves that those persons were not susceptible to smallpox.” —Dr. C. G. R. Moutoux, 1905 

Dr. C. G. R. Moutoux, “Chapter X. Auxiliaries of Hygiene,” Health and Disease: A Popular Exposition on the Essentials of Health, 1905, Oakland, California, p 64. 

CHASE HUGHES: How to Spot Subtle Signs of Deception


You spot the deception immediately when he compares one description of events from Lisa compared to a suspect where he asks about Wednesday night.  Interesting.  Chase is talking with Lisa Bilyeu.  

DR. RIMA LAIBOW: John D. Rockefeller paid for the Bolshevik Revolution

"John D. Rockefeller paid for the Bolshevik Revolution."  Well, she's not wrong.  Check out Antony Sutton's book, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, 1974.

from Good Reads,

Why did the 1917 American Red Cross Mission to Russia include more financiers than medical doctors? Rather than caring for the victims of war and revolution, its members seemed more intent on negotiating contracts with the Kerensky government, and subsequently the Bolshevik regime. In a courageous investigation, Antony Sutton establishes tangible historical links between US capitalists and Russian communists. Drawing on State Department files, personal papers of key Wall Street figures, biographies and conventional histories, Sutton the role of Morgan banking executives in funneling illegal Bolshevik gold into the US; the co-option of the American Red Cross by powerful Wall Street forces; the intervention by Wall Street sources to free the Marxist revolutionary Leon Trotsky, whose aim was to topple the Russian government; the deals made by major corporations to capture the huge Russian market a decade and a half before the US recognized the Soviet regime; and, the secret sponsoring of Communism by leading businessmen, who publicly championed free enterprise. "Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution" traces the foundations of Western funding of the Soviet Union. Dispassionately, and with overwhelming documentation, the author details a crucial phase in the establishment of Communist Russia. This classic study - first published in 1974 and part of a key trilogy - is reproduced here in its original form. (The other volumes in the series include "Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler" and a study of Franklin D. Roosevelt's "1933 Presidential election in the United States").

SABINE HAZAN: there are so many foods that we don't realize what we're eating that are killing the microbiome, that are killing the bifidobacteria. So, if you think that a yogurt is going to bring you back the health, or probiotics is going to bring you back to health, no, it's not going to happen.

[the probiotic brands] typically 16 out of 17 don't even have bifidobacteria in there.  You have to ask yourself, is the one that has bifidobacteria is it alive or dead?

Hazan has pointed out that vitamin C, vitamin D3, exercise, and 1 cup of coffee increase bifidobacteria.  So these items should be a good place to start.  

Last year, Hazan said that "vitamin C, vitamin D, and zinc increase the microbiome,"

I said I bet you hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin kill the virus, and then vitamin C, vitamin D, and zinc increase the microbiome.  Right when we found the whole genome of COVID in the stools, we discovered that two people who were on hydroxychloroquine and Z-Pak didn't have the virus anymore. 

She made a similar point in 2023, adding that Ivermectin improves oxygenation.  Ivermectin is a fermented product of a bacteria.  

TODAY'S TRANSCRIPT

What about probiotics because they're everywhere, like they're in the refrigerated [section], they're on the shelf, they're here, they're in the drinks, . . .

. . . while they say they're in the drinks, but they're not.

There's kombucha and this and probiotics.  And then there's my kids were drinking these soda drinks that are . . . 

. . . the probiotic drinks

Yeah, these sodas like probiotics.

So we tested 26 products, as you know, on the market, and only three of them had probiotics in them, bifidobacteria in them.  The others didn't.  So the majority of drinks on the market do not even have it. It's just garbage.  It's a marketing tool they're using, and there's no control of that, by the way.  Nobody is controlling this because it's a business they sell.  Who's going to check it, right?

The probiotics, even the probiotics on the counters, like the brands of the pharmacy, etc., typically 16 out of 17 don't even have bifidobacteria in there.  You have to ask yourself, is the one that has bifidobacteria is it alive or dead?  So what I do with my patients, and they usually tell me, "Well, I'm on probiotics.  Should I stop taking my probiotics?"  I go, "No, absolutely not.  Let's see.  If I can see if bifidobacteria in your stools.  And 9 out of 10, I don't.  They come in with zero bifidobacteria.  So I tell the patients, I go, "Well, you either killed your bifidobacteria with these probiotics that were meant to help you because they're not really good probiotics, or you're basically not taking the right probiotics and there's no bifidobacteria in that probiotic.  So that's my theory.  You've got to be very careful.  Also, here's the thing.  Probiotics alone are not going to do it.  It's a combination therapy.  Here is what I tell all my patients.  If you have a house that's burning and you're pouring gasoline and water, the house is going to burn to the ground.  You're never going to turn off that fire because you're pouring gasoline and water.  So, if I'm taking probiotics and I'm taking my glass of tequila three times a day, well, I'm pouring gasoline and I'm killing the bacteria, so it's not going to work.  So there are so many foods that we don't realize what we're eating that are killing the microbiome, that are killing the bifidobacteria.  So, if you think that a yogurt is going to bring you back the health, or probiotics is going to bring you back to health, no, it's not going to happen.

Hazan has pointed to Ivermectin's benefits as a fermented product.  So fermented foods are your dietary best bets.  And then also take vitamin C, vitamin D3 (with magnesium), and Ivermectin, and you're at least on the right track.  

Saturday, June 28, 2025

Does the 14th Amendment mandate Birthright citizenship?

Many people assume that the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause requires so called birthright citizenship, such that the children of illegal aliens must automatically become US citizens.  Donald Trump recently issued an executive order clarifying the meaning of the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause, arguing that it does not mandate birthright citizenship, and he happens to be absolutely right.  Birthright citizenship is a terrible idea that only about 30 of the world's nearly 200 countries observe.  But in this video, I'm not focused on whether it's a good or bad thing, I'm looking instead at whether it really is true that the 14th Amendment mandates it.  

Trump is correct to say in his executive order that,

in no formal way that could bind anyone has "The 14th Amendment ever been interpreted to extend citizenship universally to everyone born in the United States." 

So I'm going to give you a quick run through of the issue.  First, I recommend a book called Citizenship Without Consent: Illegal Aliens in the American Polity, written by Peter Schuck and Rogers M. Smith, Yale University Press, 1985.  In that book, they make a compelling case that the 14th Amendment does not mandate Birthright citizenship.  Schuck and Smith begin a summer 2018 article in National Affairs this way,

If an unauthorized alien gives birth to a child on American soil, is a child automatically a United States citizen?

Americans have long assumed that the answer is yes, that the child is a Birthright citizen regardless of the parent's legal status and that such citizenship is required and guaranteed by the Constitution. 

But a closer examination of the matter suggests that this answer is actually incorrect, and that Birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants here illegally is better understood as a matter for Congress and the American people to resolve.

What makes their conclusion especially interesting is that Chuck and Smith describe themselves as scholars who,

"strongly favor even more legal immigration than the U.S. now accepts, and a generous amnesty for those now here illegally.

So even though their conclusion runs counter to their personal political beliefs and they are not Trump sympathizers in the least, they contend that the evidence is so strong against Birthright citizenship that scholarly honesty compels them to say so.  

The fact that many opponents of Birthright citizenship for the children of unauthorized parents harbor anti-immigrant views does not mean that their bottom line position is wrong.

They argue that because the Constitution does not mandate Birthright citizenship, the matter may be regulated by Congressional statute instead, which is precisely what was done for Native Americans.

Let's examine the details of the argument against the birthright citizenship interpretation of the 14th Amendment.  The 14th Amendment to the Constitution begins,

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

What was the purpose of this clause?  As people agreed at the time, it involved the question of the Freedmen who, according to the 1857 Dred Scott Decision, we're not citizens.  A constitutional amendment would place the question beyond the reach of any statute but they couldn't just say that everyone born in the United States was a citizen because that would include Indians and their allegiance belong not to the United States but to the tribes of which they were members.  Hence the addition of the phrase, "subject to the jurisdiction thereof."  Black Americans born here were obviously subject to US jurisdiction, while Indians weren't.  So this clause made the precise distinction that the situation called for.  You'll notice that the reason Indians were excluded is that they had an allegiance to a foreign power, namely their tribal governments.  Illegal aliens would therefore be excluded by the same language and for the same reason.

That phrase, "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," is therefore key to understanding the clause.  The argument of Trump's legal supporters is that illegal immigrants are subject to a foreign sovereignty are therefore not subject to us jurisdiction and thus the citizenship clause above does not apply to them.  Trump's opponents on the other hand are trying to argue that the "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" wording does not exclude illegal aliens, and that it excludes only children who may be born to foreign diplomats who reside in the United States but are citizens of foreign countries.  But children born to parents who are diplomats to the United States constitute such a vanishingly small number of people that it is hard to credit the idea that they would have received such prominent positioning in a Constitutional Amendment.  In fact, the main argument in favor of Birthright citizenship these days is that "but . . . we've had it for such a long time." But of course whether something "has been done for a long time" has nothing to do with weather the practice is mandated by the Constitution or not.  What was meant by "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" in the 14th Amendment was that in order for you to be an American citizen you had to be subject to no other sovereign.  Congressman John Bingham, sometimes called the father of the 14th Amendment itself, held that the meaning of this clause was that,

Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.

So there it is parents not owing Allegiance to any foreign sovereignty but illegal immigrants are subject to a foreign power namely to the government where they legally reside and their children are there for excluded from the citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment Senator Jacob Howard who introduced the 14th Amendment various provisions on the senate floor on May 23rd 1866, said, he regarded the citizenship class as,

Simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already declaratory of the law as it already existed.

This is a reference to the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which stated that,

All persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens in the United States.  

I've heard some misinformed Libertarians argue that illegal immigrants are in fact subject to us jurisdiction after all because if they commit a crime they can get arrested by us authorities so that proves their subject to us jurisdiction they triumphantly argue and therefore the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause does indeed apply to their children born here.  But that would make everybody who visits the United States as a tourist into a U.S. citizen, because any tourist can also get arrested here for committing a crime.  

7:43.  The meaning of the clause which we can ascertain from the statements of its drafters, as well as from the Civil Rights Act of 1866, is that a person must be subject to the complete jurisdiction of the US in order to be a US citizen.  So if a tourist comes to the United States from Iceland, that person has to obey our laws, including, for example, our traffic laws regarding roundabouts, which are different here than they are in Iceland.  If he violates these laws, he will find himself up against U.S. law enforcement.  But because he is not fully subject to us jurisdiction, he cannot be punished for treason and he can't be drafted into the US Military. So such are not under the complete jurisdiction of the United States.  

8:31Thomas Cooley in his 1880 treatise The Great Principles of Constitutional Law in the United States of America, says, that 

"Subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States "meant that full and complete jurisdiction to which citizens generally are subject and not any qualified or partial jurisdiction, such as may consist with allegiance to some other government.  

Likewise, in the 1884 case of "Elk v. Wilkins," the Supreme Court said that,

"Subject to the jurisdiction thereof" required that someone be "not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate Allegiance.

We also read in that decision, 

Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States, members of, and owing immediate allegiance to, one of the Indian tribes (an alien though dependent, power) although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more "born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" within the meaning of the first section of the 14th Amendment, than the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government, or the children born within the United States, of ambassadors or other public Ministers of foreign Nations.

Did you catch that in noting that Indians were excluded from automatic citizenship the courts said they were no more citizens then were the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government in other words it was obvious to the court that of course the children of people who were subjects of foreign governments weren't US citizens .  The first time the Supreme Court mention this citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment though was 12 years earlier in 1872 Slaughterhouse cases just four years after the amendment was ratified. And just 4 years after the Amendment's ratification, the court said that,

The phrase "subject to its jurisdiction" was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, councils, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States. 

But in the 1898 case, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, decided some 30 years after the ratification of the 14th Amendment, Justice Horace Gray in a 5-4 decision suddenly adopted the opposite view and by assertion.  This is the case that Birthright citizenship supporters point to rather than the cases that were chronologically closer to the actual passage of the 14th Amendment.  But this isn't the first time and it won't be the last that the court has been wrong.  For one thing, we read in that case that when the Constitution is unclear, Americans have to rely upon the common law inherited from England.  According to the common law Doctrine of "Use solely," everyone born on the king soil owes allegiance to the king and perpetuity and thus Birthright citizenship is the rule in America well that's pretty weak we broke from that way of thinking in the Declaration of Independence.  Furthermore, legal scholar John Eastman writes,

Wong Kim Ark involved a child born to parents who were permanently domiciled in the United States not those who were only here temporarily or illegally.

Indeed, honest Scholars will be forced to acknowledge that the Supreme Court has never held that the children of illegal immigrants or even temporary lawful visitors are constitutionally entitled to automatic citizenship merely by virtue of their birth in the United States.  

Most people aren't even aware that there is a constitutional argument against birth rights citizenship that's because most of us were victims of educational malpractice in fact there are plenty of other controversial issues about which we've heard only the approved version but real American history, the politically incorrect kind, that hasn't been sanitized or falsified by wackos, is much more interesting and that's what I specialize in at Woodshistory.com, the history they kept from you.  Learn from me over there for free.  That's Woodshistory.com

Friday, June 27, 2025

KEVIN DALTON: Santa Monica business owner so desperate for relief from the homeless epidemic is offering people free plane tickets home

Compare this direct effort to Newsom's $37 billion homeless solution

MLK using Christ to serve the anti-Christ?

OWEN BENJAMIN: [Star Wars is about] a human trafficker with a monkey working for a slug?

JOHN RICHUS: The TVA is brutalizing the residents of this county, and only @realDonaldTrump can stop them, as TVA has NO oversight.

Thursday, June 26, 2025

JANE COLEMAN: Over 20 states offer in-state college tuition to illegals - a benefit denied US citizens from other states The Justice Dept is going after them. First it sued Texas - and ended the program within hours.

AZAT: This Christian girl lost her entire family in the lslamist suicidal attack in the Church in Damascus.

TREASURY SEC. SCOTT BESSENT: Cartels have exploited Mexico-based financial institutions to move money, enabling the vicious fentanyl supply chain that has poisoned countless Americans.

Cartels have exploited Mexico-based financial institutions to move money, enabling the vicious fentanyl supply chain that has poisoned countless Americans. Through the first use of a new powerful authority granted by Congress, Treasury will effectively require U.S. financial institutions to sever ties with 3 Mexico-based financial institutions for laundering money on behalf of cartels. Both the United States and Mexico are committed to financial systems with strong anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism controls and these actions affirm Treasury’s commitment to using all tools at our disposal to counter the threat posed by terrorist organizations.

DR. JACK KRUSE: Did you know your cholesterol level is predictive of your risk of melanoma? The higher your LDL cholesterol the lower your risk of melanoma and the higher your overall longevity.

7SEES: What you're seeing is a bunch of seemingly disconnected governments all implementing "separate" Technocratic Systems in their respective countries. It'll become the new "Space Race".

PAUL SALADINO, MD: Healthy mouthwash recipe

Spring Water, 700 ML

Salt, 4 TBSP

Cranberry Powder, 3 TBSP

Peppermint Oil, 3 or 4 drops.


DIANA WEST: Women in combat erodes the male protective instinct as well as those old-fashioned strength and speed requirements

Such conditioning erodes the male protective instinct -- which, surely, is what war is supposed to arise from -- and the female nurturing instinct, which surely is what a civilization depends on.  --Diana West.
@ 8:39, Admiral James "Ace" Lyons states it directly, "Women in combat.  All the studies tell you everything you want to know.  It's wrong. There are many viable roles for women in the military.  Combat is not one of them."

And the latest mandate on transgenders . . . .  You know Dr. [Paul] McHugh, the former lead psychologist at John Hopkins University said, "This is not a physical problem.  That's the first I'd heard somebody couldn't hear me.  He said this is not a physical problem.  This is a mental disorder.  It requires understanding and treatment.  It is not a civil rights issue.  And when the rest of you see Bruce Jenner again, tell him to get a new psychiatrist."

from Diana West's "When Women Fight, Civilization Loses," Galesburg.com, January 31, 2013.  
It (civilization) has been struggling there for decades, as social engineers and radical feminists -- all heirs to Marx -- have been cutting away at elemental human instinct, social grace, language and thought itself. This overhaul of manners and mores, the family structure and marriage -- even private aspects of the relationship between men and women -- has been successful to a point where the cultural argument against women in combat (women in the military being a lost cause) is rarely voiced, not even on the right. (I watched Fox News on women-in-combat announcement day, listening in vain for just one culture warrior.) 
We are left to make only the utilitarian arguments -- body strength and speed, unit cohesion, even urinary tract infections and other hazards that front-line deployment pose to females. These are compellingly logical points, but they are unlikely to reverse an ideological juggernaut. When the secretary of defense says putting women in combat is about "making our military ... and America stronger" and no one says he's lying to further a Marxian ideal via social engineering, the cultural argument is lost, and the culture it comes from is bound and gagged, hostage to what we know as "political correctness."
I still see threads of the cultural argument in emails and some blog responses to the Pentagon's latest whack at creating "gender neutrality." It erupts like a reflex against the conditioning to deny differences defined, at their essence, by muscle mass and womb. Such conditioning erodes the male protective instinct -- which, surely, is what war is supposed to arise from -- and the female nurturing instinct, which surely is what a civilization depends on. 

No more. Women with wombs and without manly muscle mass now count as Pentagon-approved "warriors," modern-day knights in Kevlar, soon to be humping 80-pound packs over mountain and desert. 

So women in combat erodes the male protective instinct and drops "some of the those old-fashioned strength and speed standards."

Or maybe not. Didn't Gen. Dempsey indicate that dropping some of those old-fashioned strength and speed requirements might be in order? "If we do decide that a particular standard is so high that a woman couldn't make it," Dempsey said last week, "the burden is now on the service to come back and explain to the Secretary, why is it that high? Does it really have to be that high?" Of course not! Why train Navy SEALs when Navy OTTERs will do as well?

SASHA LATYPOVA: "Gain-of-function viruses are not possible... Pfizer... tried... [to synthesize SARS-COV-2] from the computer model with the HIV insert and the furin cleavage site. And they tried it on monkeys, and none of the monkeys got sick."

Wednesday, June 25, 2025

Call it Plan Xyklon B

For example, insurance companies typically don’t cover shots that aren’t recommended by ACIP. An ACIP recommendation is also the basis on which the federal Vaccines for Children Program pays for vaccines for minors whose families can’t afford them. That program covers vaccine costs for about half of U.S. children.

Former Merck consultant and dismissed ACIP member Dr. Helen Chu was quoted in a recent op-ed in MedPage Today as calling on physicians to “turn away” from ACIP’s vaccine recommendations. She received thousands of dollars from Merck in the year before her ACIP appointment.

Merck is the manufacturer of multiple major childhood vaccines, including the Gardasil HPV vaccine; the MMRII for measles, mumps and rubella; a chicken pox vaccine and several others. 

ROBIN MONOTTI: WEARABLES ARE FOR YOUR OWN GOOD! THEY SAVE GRANNY! - Former DARPA spinoff ARPA-H Deputy Director & current CDC Director


Deputy Director of Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health, ARPA-H, Dr. Susan Monarez.  , "Dr. Monarez comes to CDC from the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), most recently serving as deputy director of ARPA-H since January 2023."

Tyrannical Surveillance, the Path to Sound Healthcare?

DR. ERIC BERG: You can get rid of a wart or skin tag with this remedy. Mix 5 drops of povidone iodine with just one drop of garlic.

 
HOW TO GET RID OF WARTS

This is how you get rid of warts overnight.  This trick involves a simple household remedy that will destroy warts and skin tags at a much deeper level at the very root.  

Warts really aren't a skin problem they are a human papilloma virus, which is very common in a lot of people because it's very contagious.  A skin tag is not a virus but it's affected by blood sugar issues.  You can get rid of a wart or skin tag with this remedy.  Mix 5 drops of povidone iodine with just one drop of garlic.  You can use a garlic press or two spoons to crush the garlic.  G get 1 drop of garlic juice directly on the wart or skin tag.  Cover with a band-aid, and if it doesn't go away in one night, continue to do this daily until it shrinks to nothing. 

CHAD O. JACKSON: How communists fomented race riots

Black Wall Street was built back relatively quickly after the race riot and so too were many of the other black communities where are these riots took place.  There were two reasons for this that the Communists would come to understand by the 1930s.  The first is that you have to remember that Booker T. Washington, 1856-1915, only died the decade before many of these race riots took place, and so the entrepreneurial spirit was still alive and well in many of the black communities.  

The Communists were Masters at covertly creating disasters in order to cause discontent they did this for example by bombing their own houses and bombing black churches and then crying white supremacy.

00:21.  Carl Braden, 1914-1975, for example, was convicted for doing such a thing where he bought a house for a black party member in a predominantly white neighborhood then fanning the flames by drawing attention to the fact that a negro just moved into a white Kentucky neighborhood.

00:42.  "They arrested Carl Braden for bombing his own house and charged him with sedition and he spent years in jail," explains Mortimer Daniel Rubin, Former Secretary Young Communist League, 1931-2015.

The charges were ultimately dropped.  This, of course, should not be looked at as a revelation of Innocence.  The communists dedicated a lot of time and effort to mastering litigation.

Breaking News: The Illinois Supreme Court has just overturned Empire actor Jesse Smollett's conviction.

In recent years the charges against Jussie Smollett were dropped.

. . . staging a racist and homophobic attack against himself then lying about it to the police.

It would, of course, be foolish to look at that as a revelation of his innocence

01:19.  Carl Braden and his wife, Anne, of course, would go on to be relatively close to Martin Luther King and be heavily involved in the Civil Rights Movement, which ironically was constantly being victimized by church bombings.

There have been more unsolved bombings of negro homes and churches in Birmingham than any other city.  --Martin Luther King

Although the Soviet directive to demoralize blacks was effective in many ways, it didn't completely solidify blacks to the ranks of the Communist Party.

Black Wall Street was built back relatively quickly after the race riot and so too were many of the other black communities where are these riots took place.  There were two reasons for this that the Communists would come to understand by the 1930s.  The first is that you have to remember that Booker T. Washington, 1856-1915, only died the decade before many of these race riots took place, and so the entrepreneurial spirit was still alive and well in many of the black communities.  The second was that they were empowered by their unshakable faith in God, which the Communists discovered was a hurdle that they, the Communists, couldn't jump simply by being dismissive of religion as an opiate of the people.

We have been watching the Communist takeover of territories and countries.  While this was going on . . . around the world, . . . 

As a result of this, they set their sights on the church to subvert it for their own goals.

. . . their movements follow a rather rigid pattern, and there's a reason for this, because it is spelled out in the Communist International's official publication, Communist.

CHASE HUGHES: Silence is your sword and self-control is your shield.


Every time that you don't respond to a provocation, every single time that you withhold explanation, every time that you don't let somebody into your emotional living room, you're building muscle.  And this is Authority muscle, self-respect muscle, self-esteem muscle if you want to call it that.  Silence is your sword and self-control is your shield.  People will say, "Don't take it personally," as if it were easy, but you can do that.  And when you master it, you truly become unreachable.  It's not because you're hiding, it's because you choose to be.  So the world has no choice but to respect that, and they may not like that but they're definitely going to feel it and they will adjust.  People always adjust.
Exercise is the great reveal. You don't need your your doctor to subject you to invasive exams.  Simply exercise and find tour weaknesses and fix from there. 

I started doing jumping jacks recently as part of my routine and I found out that my upper body does them fine almost like a teenager but my lower body--glutes, hip flexors, ankles needed the practice.  It's due to extended hours of sitting. 


Hip flexors are a group of muscles located at the front of your hips that allow you to lift your knees and bend at the waist. The main muscles in this group include the iliacus, psoas major, rectus femoris, and sartorius, which work together to facilitate movement and maintain stability.


5 muscles that make up the hip flexors.  

The hip flexors consist of 5 key muscles that contribute to hip flexion: iliacus, psoas, pectineus, rectus femoris, and sartorius.



Tuesday, June 24, 2025

SPIRO: Watch Klaus Schwab explain how wearable tech will lead to implantable tech into our bodies We know Elon is the brain chip guy & now RFK Jr is pushing wearables on every American Seems like the WEF rebranded itself as MAGA & MAHA

WALL STREET APES: ICE raid at a California construction job site They are lined up, questioned and processed by immigration This is just one job site. Multiply this by thousands. American citizens have been replaced

DORIS LOH: You can become "smarter" if you have efficient neurons that fire with greater signal strength allowing for faster information processing. Melatonin facilitates neuronal metabolic switching that helps neurons produce more ATP to support neuronal health, performance, and survival.

DORIS LOH: Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) is an extremely aggressive rodent cancer model, killing inoculated rodents in 14 days. EAC is similar to pancreatic, glioblastoma, TNBC, and ovarian cancer in humans. Melatonin at 50 and 100 mg/kg for 14 days shrinks EAC in mice dose-dependently.


1:21  Privacy Screen?  A privacy filter, or privacy protector.  You put it on your phone or your computer, and it will limit the viewing angle of your phone or screen to make it hard for people nearby to see what's on it.  Think about all the sensitive information we access on our devices we view banking details and passwords we read private conversations.  We watch hentai.  Did she just?

Our private activities are broadcast brightly from our glowing screen, making it super easy for those around us to see what we're doing. I've sat at the back of conference halls and seen the private activity on laptops and phones even from the other side of the room.

2:00.  At 25 meters you can clearly see the detail on both screens.

2:04.  I've sat in movie theaters and read the private conversations of the people in front of me I would have much rather than than watching the movie by the way put your damn phone away!

On public transport people these days use their devices constantly and those nearby can all participate in what I'm sure are not meant to be group activities.  Strangers shoulder surfing on what we do on our devices can be dangerous.  --Wall Street Journal
Thieves are using the iPhone passcode to get into stolen phones and loot they're victims bank accounts and money apps.
He grabbed the phone and then disappeared. 

In fact, just yesterday I was on a plane and a lady a few rows in front had a spreadsheet open, labeled [insert company name here] passwords.  A list.  Of passwords.  That I could read from my seat.

Ha ha ha.  Oh wait, you're serious. 

I almost tapped her on the shoulder to initiate a lengthy conversation about password managers but one simple often overlooked tool that would have also helped her as a humble privacy screen.  With one of these filters attached to her laptop screen, only she could have been able to see what's on the screen preventing people like me looking from the sides from snooping.  

HOW IT WORKS

Let's briefly talk about how the technology works.  Most privacy screens will either use micro-louver tech or polarization tech, and sometimes they have a combination of both.  Micro- louver privacy screens have microscopic slats that work similarly to window blinds by controlling the direction of light.  These screens use the physical structure of micro-louvers to refract, or bend, the light as it passes through the screen directing it straight ahead allowing only the person directly in front of the screen to see the content. When viewed from an angle the light is blocked or refracted in such a way that the screen appears dark or completely black.  Polarized lenses on the other hand are designed to filter the actual light waves, allowing only light traveling in a specific direction to pass through.  The molecules in the polarized film are aligned to block horizontal light waves while permitting vertical waves.  You can also get screens that combine

Monday, June 23, 2025

Economic Warfare and Narrative Control

 
04:30. Yeah I call them Davos and I've been calling them Davos for 8 years and I'll continue to call them that, but you know at the end of the day we are talking about that consortium of people, globalists, that have a distinctly European odor about them.  Call it City of London.  Call it Amsterdam. You can call it whatever you want.  Call it the Rothschilds, I don't really care.  Everybody has their version of what they think this reality is.  The truth is that it's all of them in some degree or another.  And that includes people in the United States.  Plenty of those people within the US, and that crowd, like I would put Mitt Romney and Bain Capital, for example, Black Rock, I would consider them part of Davos, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, the rest of them.  That is who is attacking the Trump policy of what he's attempting to do to reorganize and recalibrate the entire global economy.  That's where we are, and it's a fight to the death, and I think it's the most important war on the table today.  Far more important ultimately than Russia Ukraine, which is a proxy of this financial war.  

It seems like the FED has been acting politically, it's almost as if they've been acting against the current Trump Administration.

06:49.  Nope.  Not at all.

06:53.  You think Powell is playing ball?  

06:55.  I think Powell is part of the plan, and I think that the "Trump vs. Powell" fight is kayfabe.  And I have thought this for a long time because it goes back to my original argument . . . 

07:22  We are watching the United States build a completely independent financial architecture, free from influence of City of London, Euroclear, and all the rest of it.  That is a very complicated story at this point, the more I dig into that original insight 4 years ago, the more I've been able to add data to that and I don't have the time now in this context to go over all of it.  What I can tell you is that some of that story has been told.  I did a series of podcasts with Caitlin Long, #213, then Brent Johnson, #214, then Vince Lanchi, #215.  We talked about all of this stuff from three different perspectives, Episodes 213 through 215 of the Gold, Goats, and Guns podcast because we're going to a lot of depth on all of this, the sub supplemental lever, leverage ratio, the stable coin bill, all of it, gold, the bankruptcy, the LBMA, all that stuff.

08:17.  No, the way you beat Europe in the way you beat these people is you have to make their leverage that they want they want to take offshore dollars and want to leverage them up and use them against us they did it for all those years during the Libor years they didn't when they had effectively globalist control of the central banks under the Obama Administration with both Bernanke and Yellen and Geithner at the Treasury. Now that world is over.  Powell raised interest rates Powell raise the reverse repo payout rate Five basis points above the FED funds rate back in June 2021 draining the world of trillions of dollars of Base capital what I would call Global and zero

At the 22:30 mark, Tom cites "Observing Japan," Tobias Harris as he adds, "The U.S. and Japan are a united front."

VALERIE ANNE SMITH: J & J Targeted Nursing Homes To Use Antipsychotic Medications As 'Chemical Restraints' While Knowing Full Well It Would Kill Millions.…

Johnson & Johnson developed this drug, Risperdal.  It's main use is for schizophrenia but they realized that it was much more profitable if they could persuade psychiatrists in nursing homes to use it for dementia.  Now they did this even though the company knew that in dementia patients this drug often kills.  So finally the FDA put a warning on the drug that says "Don't use it in dementia. It doesn't help in dementia, and it often kills."  Johnson & Johnson, according to Grand Jury documents that I have, which as you know Josh is really rare to have, they are very secret, but according to sworn testimony before the Grand Jury, Johnson & Johnson sales reps then went to psychiatrists with two messages: one was don't worry about killing your patients; no one will ever catch you.  And the other was if you want to hide your tracks, diagnose these patients with late onset schizophrenia.  Now, you and I both know that there is no such thing as late on set schizophrenia. You get schizophrenia as an 18, 19, 20-year-old or you never get it.  And Johnson & Johnson was so successful at persuading psychiatrists to do this that to this day 1 in 9 nursing home patients in this country are diagnosed with late onset schizophrenia.  All of these diagnosis are false.  All of them are intended to hide what's really going on, and it continues to this day.

BREAKING: Over 100 people were stabbed by syringes in coordinated attack at French Music Festival

100 syringe attacks over the weekend.  145 people were jabbed with syringes at different venues across the country during Fete de la Musique.  Teenage girls were among the people who the people who ended up in hospital.  Most noticed a mark on their body before feeling ill and seeking medical help.