Showing posts with label Diana West. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Diana West. Show all posts

Sunday, May 24, 2026

DIANA WEST: when we get up to this end of the war in Europe we see this terrible progression of events by which America and the British Empire left behind probably thousands GIs and soldiers to the gulag of Joseph Stalin.


00:36.  I have to confess that this period really from the commemoration of Victory in Europe Day, V-E Day, which would be May 7th, in reality, although we celebrate it on May 8th due to Soviet appeasement through to Victory in the Pacific Day, Victory over Japan D, VJ Day, August 8th, 1945.  It always makes me uneasy or sense has since I wrote the book American betrayal which now is it's anniversary.  It's 6 years old today.  And in the period of research that preceded my writing this book I came to understand in particular this period of time and so much else is when we celebrate we commemorate, we remember what I have learned to be, and I believe documented, to be a tissue of big lies.  In fact so many and so big that I think we should talk about it as a a horse blanket a heavy wool horse blanket of big lies not just a tissue so much false history that has been twisted to manipulate us the people it comes to a head really on Memorial Day because we are commemorating the fall and the following war did and many of them go back to World War II, and, indeed this victory in Europe, the Victory over Japan Day period where we especially snap our salutes and celebrate, we, of course, as we should, the bravery of these lost fathers, grandfathers, husbands, sons, and so on.  Not really knowing the extent to which we have been betrayed and the piece of it I think that really comes to me and this really is in my book American Betrayal, the ultimate American betrayal, because it has to do with our POWs and MIAs. And if we look at the month of May really the whole spring of 1945 when we get up to this end of the war in Europe we see this terrible progression of events by which America and the British Empire left behind probably thousands GIs and soldiers to the gulag of Joseph Stalin.  And this is probably dinging in people's ears because it is such a shocking, improbable,  un-ever-spoken about kind of concept.  Indeed, I will say when I was studying this . And looking at these different acts that led to it by our government, by our president, discussions with the Secretary of State, the ambassador of Russia the chief military trying to negotiate the freedom of our soldiers, and of course British soldiers and Allied soldiers and what we might call the Red Zone because remember we have the war in Europe, the B&B Armies from the West meeting armies from the East, the Red Army.  So we have this zone of control under Soviet forces in 1945 are quite a lot of pows running around at this point the Germans having been falling apart and ultimately surrendered in early May and what happens to these men?  What happens to these men?  

14:56.  Remember, FDR believed in convergence.  He thought that the free system in the West and the Communist system in the Soviet Union would converge.  This was something he spoke about to many people.  Different kinds of people made notes at the time by Sumner Wells, by various others.  He actually spoke with Cardinal Spellman, 1889-1967, made minutes of a conversation talking about this conversion idea of Roosevelt's.  

So they were all on board with maintaining Soviet power hoping that we would get to this really happy place.  And remember, also in 1945 in May, we have the United Nations gearing up for its first meeting at San Francisco under the ageis of a straight-up Soviet agent, name Alger Hiss, a very prominent State Department official in the United States, who we find out later was a Soviet agent ushering in the sort of baby vehicle of global governance, globalism, and so on.

Meanwhile, soon you have Harry Dexter White, a Soviet agent who happened to be number two at the US Treasury working very hard to bring the global monetary system into existence.  And his first institution would be the IMF, of which he would be appointed the first head.  So we have a global system a aborning and enough people at the highest levels able to sort of push things around, influence things, keep things going, stop certain things, and stop information going.  We have Marshall.  I don't know where you put Marshall but we do have him telling returning soldiers not to say bad things about the Soviet Union.  We have a very interesting exchange between ostensibly Roosevelt and one of his top emissaries during the war, a man who had been governor, a New Deal governor of Pennsylvania, George H. Earl, III, 1890-1974, who in the spring of 1945 was sick and tired of communism.  He'd been in the East.  He'd been an Emissary for Roosevelt.  He knew the truth about the Katyn Forest Massacre, [a great 2007 movie too] the massacre of Polish Officer Corps, by the Soviets that would be blamed on the Nazis, of course, for many, many years until we finally got the truth.  But he knew the truth at the time, ried to tell Roosevelt, was rebuffed, sort of sulked for a while.  I'm being a little silly but he went quiet for a while.  At war's end, George Earl writes a very interesting letter, which we have, to Roosevelt saying, "You know, the war's coming to an end there's no problem with this.  I want to talk about the truth about our new enemy, our bigger enemy, and that would be communism led by the Soviet Union."  Also in the same spring of 1945, you have Roosevelt, or someone, tell him no, don't say anything, and stop it.  And then you have the United States government go to George Earl basically in retirement.  He's been a lieutenant commander and Emissary, and so on, and ordered him to Samoa [near Fiji] for the duration.  So you see the people who had information we're being silenced, thereby orders or literally sent to Samoa.  That's not even a joke.  He was literally sent to Samoa from the Washington area.  So he couldn't possibly open his trap.  This is what's going on at War's end and we see the international order that Donald Trump is sort of weirdly, instinctively trying to disassemble aborning and that I think is at the root of the reason that our men were just expendable.  Something bigger at stake was on the table than lives, and that's why, I think, you get to the whole gruesome realization of what I call in this book American Betrayal, I know it sounds sensational, so I hope that people who are interested in this will look at least chapter 11 of American Betrayal because I have the sources.  This is nothing theoretical.  This is all sourced to government cables that were, many of them were actually put together by the US Senate back in the 90s when we were looking at the POW/MIA issue in Vietnam specifically.

It's a terrifying thought of course, to think that pro-Communist agents in Western governments were prolonging the war in order to hand Eastern Europe to the Soviets that is a particularly chilling thought. This idea that the lives of tens of millions of people get surrendered to a horrendous dictatorship.  Of course, the giant irony, England went to war, September 1939 to save Poland and ended up handing over Poland to the Soviets is a brutal, brutal situation.  With regards to the Nazis you know socialists socialistic centrally planned fascist or communist style economies always collapse.  And so part of me is like you know with the exception of the Holocaust part of me is like couldn't they have just contained Germany and just let the system collapse?

20:38.  Absolutely and there's the other half of it which is equally terrifying which is of course the fall of nationalist China another communist infiltrator, influenced rather cataclysm which we can know we can trace led directly to other Wars in Korea and Vietnam. 

21:25.  It's really a mere image of what happened in Europe, and what happened in Yugoslavia, and what happened in China in terms of communist elements, or Pro-communist elements inside, let's stick with America, but really they were quite infiltrated in England as well and other nations pushing a line that would ultimately benefit communist factions in various countries, whether it's China with Mao or whether it's Yugoslavia with Tito or whether you can really see the pattern replayed over and over again whereby the good guy, meaning the anti-Nazi, the anti-Communist or in Chiang Kai-Shek's case, anti-Japan, imperialist Japan, and anti-communist, you see the State Department people creating these false personas of the anti-Communist of the anti-Nazi in order to prop up and glorify the Communists leaders.


Thursday, May 14, 2026

ALEX FASULO: Who’s stuck remediating the superfund site? The landowners who sold out in the first place. It’s baked right into their contracts.

Wheatfield, Indiana (Jasper County / nearby Starke County), specifically the Dunns Bridge Solar I and II facilities. 

Diana West reminds us that Red China manufactures 80% of solar panels

from Alex Fasulo

This is now a superfund site. Forever chemicals (PFAS), lead, cadmium, zinc, microplastics, and glass shards have destroyed the soil below them for centuries. 

The solar installer will have filed bankruptcy or sold the LLC multiple times by now. They’re no longer on the hook for cleaning up this mess, nor do they plan to spend the millions.

Who’s stuck remediating the superfund site? The landowners who sold out in the first place. It’s baked right into their contracts.

You won’t hear that from them, though. They signed gag orders when they took their foreign renewable money. 

And when the landowners can’t even afford it… it falls on the town. It falls on the local taxpayers.  

Tuesday, April 14, 2026

OBSERVING CONSCIOUSNESS: the Unholy Trinity [City of London, Vatican City, Washington, D.C.] are being hit on all levels

See it . . . the Unholy Trinity [City of London, Vatican City, Washington, D.C.] are being hit on all levels . . . a sustained attack to bring exposure and closure . . .

The City of London is taking hits across banking, debt, and the legal frameworks that have quietly shaped global money flow for decades . . . As those financial channels tighten and come into clearer view, the next layer follows . . . Washington, DC, post Federalization, moves into stronger alignment, where policy, enforcement, and surveillance begin operating with more unity, creating a clearer chain between decision and action . . . With money and force aligning, attention turns to Vatican City, the spiritual center that has long influenced belief, morality, and direction . . . This completes the Unholy Trinity, with each part supported by networks of influence that have worked together across finance, government, and faith . . . As pressure reaches all three, the system becomes easier to see as a whole, and the connections between these layers begin to stand out . . . What once felt separate now shows up as one structure moving through a period of exposure and reset . . .

Friday, March 13, 2026

WATCHING TUCKER QATARLSON IS LIKE WATCHING THE MOVIE MEMENTO

Thank you to Diana West.   

Ami Kozak is genius.

Sunday, November 9, 2025

Buchanan pitching for Islamic blasphemy law?

Why Pat Buchanan Became The Grand Old Man of the "Christian Nationalism" Op Against America by Diana W

Avoiding election news ostrich-like, I decided to puzzle out a new messaging mystery

Read on Substack

Friday, October 10, 2025

DIANA WEST: we have Pam Bondi, the former Qatari registered [lobbying] agent.

His advisors are at fault, but Trump is at fault for picking his advisors.  

Qatari/Saudi cabinet family surrounding Donald Trump.  What I mean by that is we have Pam Bondi, the former Qatari registered [lobbying] agent

We have Suzie Wiles, Chief of Staff, also involved in the PR world with her Qatar and previous profession. 

We have Jared Kushner, son-in-law with the $2 billion dollars Saudi loan or investment in his company shortly before the election.  

We have Tiffany's [Tiffany Trump] husband, Bulous, very involved in Islamic politics through his father's family in Lebanon.

We have the Trump boys now developing a massive Trump business, golf course, luxury site IN QATAR.  I think it is so unseemly.  It's a conflict of interest, and if the rest of the Republicans and Democrats weren't similarly bought off, you would be hearing about it because it is not right for the President's son to be profiting and making business deals while the President is in office.  I mean Lesson #1 about anything.  So you have all of this going on.  Remember that trip through the Middle East, through the Gulf trip that Donald Trump took?  This was a charm offensive that has gotten him into this place where if he had one good advisor on Islam, such as Major Stephen Coughlin, for example, or former Special FBI Agent, John Guandolo, [Twitter acct.], and I could keep listing, so any of these people, who would have explained to him that Islamic jihad groups, like Hamas, and it is not them alone, it's in the panoply of Muslim Brotherhood, constellations, it's a branch . . .  if they enter into any sort of "peace negotiations," it's because they are in a period of weakness, which we can see, 

Why is peace not possible and between Israel and fundamentalist Muslims?

From the Islamic point, peace means when Islam has taken over the world, established its imperialistic caliphate and Sharia is implemented the Islamic law is implemented throughout the world, then we have peace.  Peace in Islam means you surrender and you submit the word Islam means surrender when they shout Allahu Akbar and you become Muslim it means you just surrendered to an Islamic Army.  That is their understanding of peace as Muslims from your perspective as a Christian it is cute pretty much that you want peace they don't they want you to surrender they want you to page which is the latest revelation of the self-diagnosed profit of Islam it says that you fight them till they surrender chapter 9 verse 28, 29, and 30.  Those are the verses, I gave you those, these are all about Christians and Jews.  You fight them until they surrender.  You want peace with them; they don't, and the Islamic regime of Iran has proven that over and over.  Israel wanted to be left alone.  They wanted to live their lives, but the Iranian regime "Death to America!" "Death to Israel!"  They just kept provoking.  They just kept sending proxies, they sent missiles.  How long can you put up with it?  You want peace, that's understandable.  They don't.

1:41.  Muslims should not concede or compromise with people when we have the higher ground or we have the upper ground there's actually an amazing eye in the Quran.  Ia 139, to be honest with you Islam has the upper hand we're not going to give you that concession.

1:57.  Hudna.  It means when you're weak you make treaties until you get strong enough to disregard them.

There is only HUDNA, temporary treaty when Muslims are in a weak position until they get stronger and try to conquer you again.

RETURN TO DIANA WEST INTERVIEW

17:15.  See with our own eyes and they're entering into what Islamic lies called hudna.  This is a temporary truce that allows an Islamic fighting group to gain time in order to get strong and break the truce.  And this is not me talking.  This is Islam, and it goes back 1400 years.  This is elementary, and similarly we have the Islamic concept very important of taqiya, which is deception, and you have it from on high, on Islamic high that is, for Muslims to lie to advance Islam.  This is a holy writ.  There is no Thou shalt not lie as we have in the Ten Commandments and the religion judicial or legal organization known as Islam it doesn't exist so if you know those two basic things that anyone can grass because of course Islam was basically design for 9-year-old boys to grasp.  If you know those two things, you do not put out messages about how Hamas is ready for peace, P E A C E, has Donald Trump does and expect anything but rack and ruin.  To come of it and I'm very sorry to say that but this is just this kind of exercise that we've seen time and time again and it is so sad to see Donald Trump tragic to see Donald Trump sucked in by it but you know sucked in he is and this is kind of where we are but is this basic understanding of Islam that has been blocked out of anyone in authority in America certainly from 9/11 forward.

18:57.  It's a blind spot when that he has when it comes to business and making money.  And let's be honest, it if it were the Democrats doing this, we'd be screaming bloody murder.

19:10.  Right, with Hunter Biden.  Golf Club deal with Qatar while his father was yes exactly that is part of the genius of this in terms of the bad guys advancing their agendas because we are confused if it's Donald Trump we know that he loves America we know he wants the best for us but it's a blind spot or we don't know what it is we judge them by their actions as the Bible tells us right know them by their fruits we don't know what's going on in his head we never will and similarly for everyone involved and is frightening because we've seen this many times in cases of Israel fighting Islamic armies that the United States generally stops Israel before it finishes any sort of War decisively

Saturday, September 13, 2025

ION MIHAI PACEPA: During the Cold War, more people in the Soviet bloc worked for the dezinformatsiya [disinformation] machine than for the Soviet army and defense industry put together.

If the Soviet penetration of Washington, D.C., was so wide and so deep that it functioned like an occupation...

If, as a result of that occupation, American statecraft became an extension of Soviet strategy …

If the people who caught on – investigators, politicians, defectors – and tried to warn the American public were demonized, ridiculed and destroyed for the good of that occupation and to further that strategy …

And if the truth was suppressed by an increasingly complicit Uncle Sam …

Would you feel betrayed?

Now available from St. Martin's Press, American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation’s Character


An excerpt from American Betrayal, Chapter 4 on censorship of totalitarianism both in the Soviet Union and the U.S.
What do I mean by "armies"?  Ion Mihai Pacepa, former Chief of intelligence in communist Romania, told me, "During the Cold War, more people in the Soviet bloc worked for the dezinformatsiya [disinformation] machine than for the Soviet army and defense industry put together.  The bloc's intelligence community alone had over one million officers (the KGB had over 700,000) and several million informants around the world.  All were involved in deceiving the West--and their own country--or in supporting the effort. 

Remember way back in 2022, how Biden installed one Nina Jankowicz to lead the Department of Homeland Security's Disinformation Governance Board?

I don't know how or what you think of communism, but you should know that violence and invasion are part and parcel of its  immoral ideology and destructive action.  Which is why Bolsheviks and internationalists slid underground into movements like the Environmental Movement, call it Global Warming, change the name to a more general and vacuous moniker, to suck more people into a fool's errand.  If you've forgotten about all the communist invasions, let me help.  As critical as I can be, even I underestimated the number of invasions, 

Estonia, 1918.
Latvia, 1918. Lithuania, 1918. Finland, 1918. Poland, 1918. Ukraine, 1918. Belarus, 1918. Moldova, 1918. Georgia, 1918. Azerbaijan, 1918. Central Asia, 1918. Tuva, 1918. Mongolia, 1921. Georgia, 1924. Estonia, 1924. China, 1929.  Japan, 1938. Poland, 1939-1956. Finland, 1939. Estonia, 1940. Latvia, 1940. Lithuania, 1940. Romania, 1940. Ukraine, 1942. Bulgaria, 1944. Hungary, 1944. Japan, 1945. Yugoslavia, 1944. China, 1944. Baltic States, 1944. Poland, 1944. Korea, 1950. East Germany, 1953, Hungary, 1956. Vietnam, 1960. Laos, 1960. Czechoslovakia, 1968. China, 1969. Israel, 1967.  Ethiopia, 1975.  Angola, 1975. Somalia, 1977. Afghanistan, 1979. Baltic States, 1990. Georgia, 1990. Azerbaijan, 1990. Moldova, 1992. Tajikistan, 1992. Northern caucuses, 1992. Georgia, 2008. Ukraine, 2014. Syria, 2015.

Poland, 1939-1956.  

Baltic States, 1940-1991.

Finnish territories, 1940.

Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina, 1940.

Iran, 1941-1946.

Hungary, 1944-1991.

Romania, 1944-1958.

Bulgaria, 1944-1947.

Czechoslovakia, 1944-1947

Northern Norway, 1944-1946, and Bornholm Denmark, 1945-1946.

Eastern Germany, 1945-1949.

Austria, 1945-1955.

Manchuria, 1945-1946.

Korea, 1945-1948.

Kuril Islands, 1945.

COLD WAR

Hungarian Revolution of 1956.

Czechoslovakia, 1968-1989.

Afghanistan, 1979-1989.  

LINUXHIPPIE: When the Floyd Riots happened, both the GOPe & the Left oriented on the same language. "Peaceful Protest" Now we see the same thing with "civility" "tone down" "unity" & "gun violence" "both sides".

There has been an ongoing Marxist lead insurgency in the country since the 1960's. The Marxist made common cause (United Front) with Islam to destroy the United States, and they are winning.
We all know precisely what has happened, the "grand conspiracy" is staring you right in the face, it is these people demanding you accept their framing of events so they can continue to accelerate the dismantling of Constitution and Bill of Rights. --Linuxhippie
When the Floyd Riots happened, both the GOPe & the Left oriented on the same language. "Peaceful Protest" Now we see the same thing with "civility" "tone down" "unity" & "gun violence" "both sides". When these people use the word "dialogue" it doesn't mean what you think it means---- and they know you don't know it. A call for "Dialogue" turns what follows into a dialectical event. Which typically manifests into intersectional lines of attack, and has as it's object a target for negation. In this case there are likely several targets but make no mistake, they all are directed at YOU. I would like to point out, nobody rioted or burned down buildings. There wasn't massive protests, just vigils. So what are we exactly suppose to "tone down?" Our outrage at an innocent man being assassinated at a public speaking event on a college campus? Our complete and total frustration at the lack of any serious effort to address the ongoing Marxist / Islamic revolution that (IS) the "formal cause" of the assassination of Charlie Kirk and the murders of innocent American Citizens? Make no doubt, Lankford knows exactly what he's doing. He expects some outrage (which will be dismissed as fringe) but he's betting that if enough of his colleagues continue the "praxis" they'll achieve political acceptance. You cannot dismiss this man as being weak or a cuck. You cannot accept his rhetoric as being legitimate or you are consigning yourself to destruction. Final Cause is FIRST in the order of "intention" but last in the order of "execution". Said differently, he made the decision to say what he said based on a careful analysis of "their" objectives. This is the real enemy that must be defeated or anything we attempt is doomed from the outset. There has been an ongoing Marxist lead insurgency in the country since the 1960's. The Marxist made common cause (United Front) with Islam to destroy the United States, and they are winning. Lankford's words are based on a "dialectical" framing of events not in reality. There is simply zero evidence to substantiate his position. If you can find an event on the chart below, that (IS) what it (IS), it's not any more complicated than that. To deny that is to willfully support the actions of those who seek you totally destruction. We all know precisely what has happened, the "grand conspiracy" is staring you right in the face, it is these people demanding you accept their framing of events so they can continue to accelerate the dismantling of Constitution and Bill of Rights. Never debate the absurd.

Thursday, August 7, 2025

ERIC DAUGHERTY: 🚨 HOLY CRAP! Stephen Miller reveals Democrats got 20 to 30 HOUSE SEATS from counting illegals in the Census.

Tuesday, July 1, 2025


3:13.  What this book asks the reader to do is to make connections to take a step back to have some perspective on what's happened to us over the past 50 years . . . .

3:23.  Make connections. Why do we need to do that?

3:26.  Because we don't understand what's going on I think people are so content to take the official narrative as it set in the mainstream media as it set by the politicians in the White House, in Hollywood, and our fate and I think that these sorts of connections that I tried to draw in The Death of the Grown-Up had to do with trying to understand where we were at the point which I wrote that book, which I do feel to this day is in a very disadvantageous position to confront these challenges from islamization, from infantilization of the culture and the politics.  So I was trying to figure out how it is that we arrived at this position of impotence.

4:14.  Talk about your upbringing in Hollywood what were the circumstances what were your father and mother like and what did they do?

4:22.  To preface my dad's career he did begin as a liberal his first vote was cast as a soldier in France somewhere in 1944 for FDR I think his next vote Henry Wallace in 1948 but he had moved right himself by the '60s when I was born.  I wasn't following these things at the time.  But he was a cold warrior in the sense that he was very fascinated and very driven to write stories about the changes that were going on in the post-war world, very fascinated by Europe, by the politics, and so he liked to try to bring those stories to light, and came up against a wall in Hollywood.  I could tell you a whole show's worth of stories in terms of the politics he encountered in the 1960s trying to discuss Germany communist infiltration Vietnam Etc all these kinds of stories that Hollywood did not want to sell one quick example he had a novel he was going to write that he sold two little brown I believe it was 1969/1970 about a former communist who'd become a professor at Berkeley.  His politics had changed.  This was the time of the big student rioting.  Long story short, there was a threat on the part of junior staff coming right out of the college campus world to resign en masse if that book went on the list.  And the publisher at the time, spine of jelly, caved.  So my dad actually never wrote that book.  He wrote another book that year.  But those were the kinds of times that we're living through.  So I did grow up quite aware of them, and again trying to put the pieces together 20-30 years later I guess.

6:13.  What did he do and how long did you live in Hollywood?

6:16.  I grew up there.  I was born there until I went away to college, so I grew up there, Laurel Canyon.  He was a novelist by choice and he wrote a lot of Television along the way and screenplay . . . 

6:27.  What was his name?

6:28.  Elliott West was his name and he published about five novels and wrote innumerable radio and television scripts through the years . . .

6:38.  Shows that we would know?

6:41.  Lou Grant would be one a lot of the old Alfred Hitchcock of the old danger shows a lot of the shows from Hollywood's televisions early days as well.

6:53.  How long had he lived in Hollywood?

6:55.  He came out there in the 1950s he was born in New York in Brooklyn my grandfather ran one of the movie palaces of the old days Lowe's Kings and I'd been in Vaudeville actually before that but so my dad grew up in the movies he grew up in a movie theater basically in the 1930s.

7:11.  What about Mom?

7:12.  My mother was an actress at the time she is Los Angeles born in bread she's with me right now and she grew up in California Los Angeles so at a certain point my folks moved back out there.

7:27.  What was her stage name or screen name?

7:28.   Barbara Belden she made one movie did a lot of theater and such she didn't stick with it I think by the time she was in her late twenties she left that behind but they did meet at an audition at some point.

7:41.  So what did you grow up thinking about politics?

7:45.  They were very loud and noisy we had a lot of dinner table discussions and primarily in terms of loud and noisy would be when my parents' friends would come over all liberals and there would be these discussions I mentioned in that little clip about Vietnam about Nixon about the campus riding all of these things that were very tendentious and I think I've spoken to some so-called Hollywood conservatives in more recent times and their feeling in the last decades was that the 60s was much worse it is much harder to be a conservative in Hollywood at that time they were much more Underground if they were there at all and it was difficult because it was hangover from the 1930s which is when the big infiltration came and the controls on the story gills and the agencies and so on it wasn't anyone's imagination which is what the revelations of the 1990s have told us we have learned who names dates places of concerted efforts to subvert our information Industries whether it was entertainment or Media or politics .

8:54.  You mentioned earlier Henry Wallace was a communist did he ever acknowledge being a communist?

8:58.  No no I don't believe he did very close like socialist also vegetarian and had all kinds of other . . .

9:07.  He wasn't a Russia supporting communist?

9:09.  He was a Russia supporting Democrat he was very pro-russia a very active apologist he made a very shameful famous trip to the Soviet Union during World War II I and actually went to one of the Google log camps that had been dressed up and he bought every little Shred of lie that he was served which he later did regret and actually publicly recanted.

9:33.  Several weeks ago we had a young lady on here Michelle Fields who was a journalist video journalist with the Daily Caller and I just want to run just a little bit of this to connect it to you . . .
He was a man of faith of great values and when he went to Los Angeles he became this big time writer he never changed I mean he never drove a luxury car he was still the same guy from Kentucky if he donated money when he donated he did so in anonymously he taught us that money meant nothing and he told us that we should be who we are and stay true to ourselves and he led by example he showed us that it's possible even in a world like Hollywood that you can still remain yourself and I think that's had a tremendous impact on me.
10:25.  She's a conservative.  She survived Hollywood.  When you were there and in school, did you, were you vocal about how you felt about the issues, or did you feel conservative about the issues back then?

10:42.  
 
people don't know what's going on.  We're content with accepting the mainstream narrative as it is set int he mainstream media.

Thursday, June 26, 2025

DIANA WEST: Women in combat erodes the male protective instinct as well as those old-fashioned strength and speed requirements

Such conditioning erodes the male protective instinct -- which, surely, is what war is supposed to arise from -- and the female nurturing instinct, which surely is what a civilization depends on.  --Diana West.
@ 8:39, Admiral James "Ace" Lyons states it directly, "Women in combat.  All the studies tell you everything you want to know.  It's wrong. There are many viable roles for women in the military.  Combat is not one of them."

And the latest mandate on transgenders . . . .  You know Dr. [Paul] McHugh, the former lead psychologist at John Hopkins University said, "This is not a physical problem.  That's the first I'd heard somebody couldn't hear me.  He said this is not a physical problem.  This is a mental disorder.  It requires understanding and treatment.  It is not a civil rights issue.  And when the rest of you see Bruce Jenner again, tell him to get a new psychiatrist."

from Diana West's "When Women Fight, Civilization Loses," Galesburg.com, January 31, 2013.  
It (civilization) has been struggling there for decades, as social engineers and radical feminists -- all heirs to Marx -- have been cutting away at elemental human instinct, social grace, language and thought itself. This overhaul of manners and mores, the family structure and marriage -- even private aspects of the relationship between men and women -- has been successful to a point where the cultural argument against women in combat (women in the military being a lost cause) is rarely voiced, not even on the right. (I watched Fox News on women-in-combat announcement day, listening in vain for just one culture warrior.) 
We are left to make only the utilitarian arguments -- body strength and speed, unit cohesion, even urinary tract infections and other hazards that front-line deployment pose to females. These are compellingly logical points, but they are unlikely to reverse an ideological juggernaut. When the secretary of defense says putting women in combat is about "making our military ... and America stronger" and no one says he's lying to further a Marxian ideal via social engineering, the cultural argument is lost, and the culture it comes from is bound and gagged, hostage to what we know as "political correctness."
I still see threads of the cultural argument in emails and some blog responses to the Pentagon's latest whack at creating "gender neutrality." It erupts like a reflex against the conditioning to deny differences defined, at their essence, by muscle mass and womb. Such conditioning erodes the male protective instinct -- which, surely, is what war is supposed to arise from -- and the female nurturing instinct, which surely is what a civilization depends on. 

No more. Women with wombs and without manly muscle mass now count as Pentagon-approved "warriors," modern-day knights in Kevlar, soon to be humping 80-pound packs over mountain and desert. 

So women in combat erodes the male protective instinct and drops "some of the those old-fashioned strength and speed standards."

Or maybe not. Didn't Gen. Dempsey indicate that dropping some of those old-fashioned strength and speed requirements might be in order? "If we do decide that a particular standard is so high that a woman couldn't make it," Dempsey said last week, "the burden is now on the service to come back and explain to the Secretary, why is it that high? Does it really have to be that high?" Of course not! Why train Navy SEALs when Navy OTTERs will do as well?

Thursday, May 22, 2025


-Diana West, Author of The Red Thread, American Betrayal and Death of the Grownup -Frank J. Gaffney, Jr., Executive Chairman of the Center for Security Policy -Chris Farrell, Director for Investigations and Research at Judicial Watch -Rich Higgins, Former Pentagon Official Who Served in the NSC Strategic-Planning Office About The Red Thread: The first investigation into why a ring of senior Washington officials went rogue to derail the election and the presidency of Donald Trump. There was nothing normal about the 2016 presidential election, not when senior U.S. officials were turning the surveillance powers of the federal government -- designed to stop terrorist attacks -- against the Republican presidential team. These were the ruthless tactics of a Soviet-style police state, not a democratic republic. The Red Thread asks the simple question: Why? What is it that motivated these anti-Trump conspirators from inside and around the Obama administration and Clinton networks to depart so drastically from “politics as usual” to participate in a seditious effort to overturn an election? Finding clues in an array of sources, Diana West uses her trademark investigative skills, honed in her dazzling work, American Betrayal, to construct a fascinating series of ideological profiles of well-known but little understood anti-Trump actors, from James Comey to Christopher Steele to Nellie Ohr, and the rest of the Fusion GPS team; from John Brennan to the numerous Clintonistas still patrolling the Washington Swamp after all these years, and more. Once, we knew these officials by august titles and reputation; after The Red Thread, readers will recognize their multi-generational and inter-connecting communist and socialist pedigrees, and see them for what they really are: foot-soldiers of the Left, deployed to take down America’s first “America First” and most anti-Communist president. If we just give it a pull, the “red thread” is very long and very deep.


Judicial Watch. federal attack on our election and on the presidency.

The Red Thread: A Search for Ideological Drivers Inside the Anti-Trump Conspiracy, Diana West, 2019. Why did these senior officials at the Justice Department and the FBI, elsewhere in the Obama Administration, why did they decide to engage in so many lawless acts to undermine an election and sabotage a presidency. In other words, we have a famous, wonderful system whereby the transition from one party to another every 2 to 4 years is peaceful. It's common in Washington whereby the out party does something else for a couple of years and waits to take political revenge in the next election cycle. In this case, we've seen something so foreign to our understanding of how our democracy is supposed to work that I decided to try to find out if we could find out why it is that what we're looking at is so familiar to us from totalitarian systems. And that is a very serious undertaking and it begins with the fusion GPS team of Nellie Orr and her husband at the Justice Department. This was sort of the beginning of the Red Thread. It looks at James Comey's ideological roots. It looks at John Brennan. It tries to build out ideological profiles that may help us understand why we have public servants who've sworn to uphold the Constitution who are actually operating under the very Marxist paradigm of "the ends justify the means."

5:45 James Comey, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigations, previously the #2 man at the Department of Justice, seems like an unlikely character given that personal record to have Leftist or Marxist leanings. Walk us through how they're there.

6:12 Yes, he's a very fine subject of study because he's been so open about his own philosophical influences on his entire career. When he was a senior at William and Mary, he graduated in 1982, he did a paper on the Christian and Politics and he looked at Jerry Falwell at the time, a very important figure on the right, and he looked at the man who is considered to be his own ideological mentor, Reinhold Niebuhr, 1892-1971. Most people don't know too much about Reinhold Niebuhr except that he is "liberal, protestant theologian." His writings however have shaped James Comey's outlook, not just as a student but as recently as 2018 when the New York Times interviewed him on the occasion of him publishing his memoir, A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies, and Leadership, 2018. He was asked about the most important books that influenced his life, and he selected two Niebuhr titles from 1930-something and 1940, which is the period in which Niebuhr was well known as a member of the Socialist Party in the United States, and a very militant Marxist, who in the early 30s was literally calling for the overthrow of the American social order. This is something quite staggering when you realize that James Comey used his name, Reinhold Niebuhr, as his Twitter handle until he was discovered. This was when he was incognito. This becomes someone to really investigate, to look at on James Comey's view of justice. This is what he studied as a student when he considered himself to be a communist. He was very open about this in an interview that Comey gave in 2003 with New York Magazine where he talked about being a communist in college. He "wasn't quite sure what he was now," this is what he told us as he was preparing to enter the Bush 43 Administration as the #2 at the Justice Department, but he had moved into a Republican style, you might say. It becomes evident when you look at the things that he highlighted as a young man from Niebuhr's readings, and we can go into it; I have some quotations.

Thursday, May 1, 2025

STEPHEN MILLER: Biden Judge Jennifer Thurston just ruled that Border Patrol cannot arrest illegals without individualized warrants. Judicial Coup

Jennifer Leigh Thurston is an American judge who is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. She previously served as the Chief United States magistrate judge of the same court.  

Thank you to Diana West.

TOM HOMAN ON MORNING JOE -- Not one person was vetted coming into America, now Democrats want to vet everyone we deport.

Translation: The Communist destroyers who wield power treasonously to destroy us will not relinquish their armies imported to destroy us.

Find this Tom Homan quote at the 7:45 mark. 

Monday, February 3, 2025

SADIE: only way for the Western part of Canada to get oil to the Eastern part of Canada is to send it through America.

Thank you to realDianaWest.   

Thursday, September 19, 2024

TIM WALZ’s CONNECTIONS TO CHINA with Diana West and Dave Collum

Complete interview. 

 
3:26. There was a certain skill set that I took to the problem of the anti-Trump conspiracy but for example, it is also the case and I've done some further research since that some of these players did all seem to run through Moscow before the fall of the Soviet Union or its early days.  That would be Nellie Ohr. 

Bruce Ohr.  Not sure of Bruce Ohr, but Nellie was there.
Nellie was the Russian fusion, Russian expert, kind of Christopher Steele opposite . . . Christopher Steele was there. Fiona Hill was there.  She's in the Post Red Thread research.  David the McCain Aid [David Foster Wallace?] he was there.  

Nina Jankowicz was there. 

4:24. Recently I was very shocked by this I found that Victoria Nuland has a thin Red Thread I wrote a piece on Substack yeah darling girl but she literally went to work after college I believe she went to Brown she left Brown and this would have been in the mid 80s she went to work on a Soviet fish processing trawler as her first job.  And it's very strange because of that that's not a very safe thing to do; you're going to have a dossier opened up on you.  I mean this was the '80s.

Yeah, that should keep you out of top-secret security clearance, right?

One would wonder about that.  You know, and I was very shocked.  I did not expect to find that but I did.  

5:06. Yeah, Tim Waltz who has huge Chinese connections.  Holy moly!  How did that happen?  

But think about how, where we are in terms of the country, its institutions, including the Democratic Party, which is supposed to be an American political party, in terms of thinking that's okay.  Not that long ago someone with his credentials would have been just, you know, "I'm sorry, dude, you're not going to make it into the big time."  It's amazing to me that there's no longer the survival reflex.  It's the survival reflex along with everything else that's been beaten out of us . . . 

5:48. Or they have taken over, or they have won. 

5:51. Yes I would say that is, that is the other part of the sentence . . .  

5:57.  So it's not just oblivion.  They have won.  You know, the campuses are 98% left leaning [I would say Bolshevik] right? They won that.  I don't know how you undo that.  People say, "How do you fix that?  With 98% left wing?  There's no obvious mechanism.

6:11. But that even goes down to the lower education system, elementary, middle school . . .

6:15. Daycare.  Daycare.  We are getting the kids freshman year. People say oh you guys are really screwing up the kids I got no the kids are arriving freshman year damaged they are one nudge away from being a Marxist.

6:30. And they were selected by the admissions offices.

6:34. Oh, I can't imagine what essays are being written to get in to Cornell now.  I cannot fathom.

6:39. You could select a different class if your admissions office chose to. I often think of what goes on in the admissions officer choosing these classes they've been taken over for sure and this predates the Frankfurt School I mean we didn't have to wait for Marcus to have this happen and the rest this is something that the Communists communist teachers organizations unions and so on you may have heard of Bella Dodd she was a very famous official, a Communist Party, teacher's union official out of New York who defected, went back to the Catholic Church, became very instrumental witness in probably the 1950s late 40s, 50s, explaining how these things are done.  The schools were already riddled with communist teachers.  There's a really interesting little moment when the Soviet Union . . . Interesting little moment of alliance between the Soviet Union and Nancy Germany before Nazi Germany attacked the Soviet Union 1941 so 1939 to summer '40, '41.  New York legislature did an investigation into authoritarian impulses what not in the schools and ended up with a report on the Communist infiltration in New York's Public Schools and colleges that is mind-blowing.  And this is 1941, so you've already got CCNY and the different colleges and high schools.  You've already got massive communist teacher infiltration going on, so it was already quite dense.

8:47. Communist is a strong word.  Would Marxists be more accurate?

8:50.  I think what they were looking at were Communist party members if I'm not mistaken.  I think they literally were looking at something very defined and remember back in the day it wasn't as a big deal to have a card being part of a Communist party it hadn't gone through all the other decades yet.  They used to get cards that had numbers, and I think that actually stopped when the House on Un-American Activities Committee began identifying Communist party members by their membership cards, and so they stopped issuing them.  I think that was a result of that.  

9:31  I'm going to guess your brief mention of McCarthy through unbelievable fire.  So you talk about McCarthy early in your first book, . . . 

9:37 The late great McCarthy

9:45  and I thought it was going to go seriously into McCharthy, and it didn't hardly touch on him, didn't even mention Roy Cohn, any of these guys, right, so it was in passing that McCarthy had it right, right?

9:52  Yeah, yeah, definitely. 

9:56  I'll bet you that your detractors used that for headline attacks, is that correct? 

10:03  Well, it is correct, I, and I am quite proud of this, I was called "McCarthy on Steroids."

10:12  You probably had three sentences in the book on McCarthy.  I mean it was really not a big part of the book.

10:21  It's a grounding place.  This is what I meant about Stan Evans' book about McCarthy [Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies, M. Stanton Evans, 2007.], which I really recommend; it will, I mean that really flipped my, I didn't really know anything Joseph McCarthy except what you might pick up from the vapors and the noxious references but I'd never made any kind of study of McCarthy, and then I read, I don't know how, I picked up M. Stanton Evans' book which in some ways should never have been written or published at that point and time, I mean it was over and done.  McCarthy was the demon child of American history.  He writes this book and it's amazing.  It's an amazing piece of detective work.  I mean he was a shoe-leather journalist.  Fantastic.  Basically, I thought that if you can do that with McCarthy, what else has been completely misrepresented, lie upon lie upon lie.  The other thing that also drew me in was at the time I was writing, I was a syndicated columnist, appeared on shows, and so on and this was post-9/11 times, and if you brought up Islam, and if you brought up Islam and if you  were critical of Islam, you got slammed as an islamophobe I used to write about this all the time many many columns devoted to Islam and Jihad and Dhimmitude, Islamic Law, all these things Europe I did a lot of reporting in Europe on islamization I was just wondering why can't we have a grown up conversation about Islam in this country and that book took a bit of shape from that debate believe it or not I was on the old Lou Dobbs show on CNN and it was right before Barack Obama was elected president the first time and I had some fairly mild comment I'd written about Obama's socialist policies in my column but I hadn't gotten it out on CNN and there was like this weight it's very hard to get the s word out I said I'm going to say it I'm going to say it so I'm sitting there the sound booth in Washington and it rolls around to me and I just well Lou will just have to wait and see if Senator Obama his if his policies would take the United States in his into a socialist Direction and you get the round Robin's on the pundits in this Hillary person comes on and he says Diana red beating went out a long time ago and blah blah blah and I thought red baiting I did have a chance to rebut and I did have a much better presentation on why I would think he could be socialist but the point is I didn't quite I knew red baiting vaguely but I had to go look it up and I had to figure it out and I realized that there's this correlation between Islamophobe to cut off debate, and red-baiting to cut off debate.  And then I was reading Stan Evans book about that time and that's when I started going back and ask when did this happen that we can't talk about Islam can't talk about communism and then I figured out it's before McCarthy and that was kind of the Genesis of the investigation