Monday, March 31, 2025

2014: Farid Fata, M.D., 50, of Oakland Township, Michigan, pleaded guilty in September 2014 to 13 counts of healthcare fraud, one count of conspiracy to pay or receive kickbacks, and two counts of money laundering.

administering medically unnecessary infusions or injections to 553 individual patients and submitting to Medicare and private insurance companies approximately $34 million in fraudulent claims.  --Dept. of Justice

"administering medically unnecessary infusions"?  Why that makes him normal, just like every other doctor.  Slippery slope?

from the Dept. of Justice

A Detroit area hematologist-oncologist was sentenced today to serve 45 years in prison for his role in a healthcare fraud scheme that included administering medically unnecessary infusions or injections to 553 individual patients and submitting to Medicare and private insurance companies approximately $34 million in fraudulent claims.

Farid Fata, M.D., 50, of Oakland Township, Michigan, pleaded guilty in September 2014 to 13 counts of healthcare fraud, one count of conspiracy to pay or receive kickbacks, and two counts of money laundering.  U.S. District Judge Paul D. Borman of the Eastern District of Michigan imposed the sentence and ordered Fata to forfeit $17.6 million.

“Rather than use his medical degree to save lives, Dr. Fata instead destroyed them in pursuit of profit,”  said Assistant Attorney General Caldwell.  “Time and again, Dr. Fata callously violated his patients' trust as he used false cancer diagnoses and unwarranted and dangerous treatments as tools to steal millions of dollars from Medicare, even stooping to profit from the last days of some patients' lives.  While no sentence can restore what was taken from his patients and their families, the sentence imposed ensures that never again will Dr. Fata lay hands on another patient.”

“Health care fraud has been a serious problem in Michigan, but no case has been as egregious as the conduct of Dr. Farid Fata,” said U.S. Attorney McQuade.  “Dr. Fata did not care for patients; he exploited them as commodities.  He over-treated, under-treated, and outright lied to patients about whether they had cancer so that he could maximize his own profits.”

KEVIN MCKERNAN: 95% of the gummies and vapes in the hemp stores/smoke shops contain synthetic cannabinoids.

What to look for.  Wikipedia alerts us a little. 

Synthetic cannabinoids are a class of designer drugs that include various compounds, often with alphanumeric names. Some well-known examples are JWH-018, JWH-073, AM-2201, and CP-47,497, but there are many others, and new ones are continually being developed.

Here is a list of 27 products that contain synthetic cannabinoids. And here.

I wish this stuff were fiction,

Typically, synthetic cannabinoids are sprayed onto plant matter and are usually smoked, although they have also been ingested as a concentrated liquid form in the United States and United Kingdom since 2016. They have been marketed as herbal incense, or "herbal smoking blends", and sold under common names such as K2spice, and synthetic marijuana. They are often labeled "not for human consumption" for liability defense. A large and complex variety of synthetic cannabinoids are designed in an attempt to avoid legal restrictions on cannabis, making synthetic cannabinoids designer drugs.

Most synthetic cannabinoids are agonists of the cannabinoid receptors. They have been designed to be similar to THC, the natural cannabinoid with the strongest binding affinity to the CB1 receptor, which is linked to the psychoactive effects or "high" of marijuana. These synthetic analogs often have greater binding affinity and greater potency to the CB1 receptors. There are several synthetic cannabinoid families (e.g., AM-xxxCP-xx,xxxHU-xxJWH-xxxwhich are classified by the creator of the substance (e.g., JWH stands for John W. Huffman), which can include several substances with different base structures such as classical cannabinoids and unrelated naphthoylindoles.

 

NICOTINE LOZENGES: Are you getting more nicotine from lozenges than in a single American cigarette? And if you are, is that excess nicotine via a lozenge bad for you?

a single cigarette typically contains about 10 to 12 milligrams (mg) of nicotine. However, when smoked, only about 1 to 2 mg of nicotine is absorbed by the smoker. However, only about 50-60% of the nicotine in a lozenge is absorbed through the mouth’s mucous membranes, meaning 20-24 mg consumed would deliver roughly 10-14 mg into your system over time, depending on usage and absorption efficiency. --Grok
How much nicotine is in a single American cigarette?

from Grok: 

In the United States, a single cigarette typically contains about 10 to 12 milligrams (mg) of nicotine, though this can vary depending on the brand, blend, and specific product (e.g., light, full-flavor, or menthol). For example, popular American brands like Marlboro or Camel often fall within this range. However, when smoked, only about 1 to 2 mg of nicotine is absorbed by the smoker, as factors like the cigarette’s filter, ventilation, and smoking behavior (e.g., how deeply or frequently one puffs) affect the actual intake. The U.S. tobacco industry doesn’t have a strict standard for nicotine content, so it’s consistent with global averages but can differ slightly across manufacturers.

What are the risks from prolonged consumption of nicotine lozenges? 

Prolonged consumption of nicotine lozenges, like any nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), carries potential health risks, though they’re generally considered safer than smoking since they don’t involve inhaling tar, carbon monoxide, or other combustion byproducts. The risks tied to long-term use stem primarily from nicotine itself—a highly addictive substance that affects multiple systems in the body—and, to a lesser extent, from the lozenges’ other ingredients. Here’s a breakdown based on current understanding:
Nicotine is a stimulant that acts on the cardiovascular system. Over time, it can elevate heart rate and blood pressure by triggering the release of adrenaline and constricting blood vessels. Studies suggest chronic nicotine exposure may increase the risk of hypertension, atherosclerosis (plaque buildup in arteries), and heart disease. For example, research on nicotine’s vasoconstrictive effects shows it can reduce blood flow, potentially straining the heart, especially in people with preexisting conditions like coronary artery disease. While the risk is lower than with smoking—where studies estimate a 2-4 times higher chance of heart attack—prolonged use still carries a measurable impact.
The addiction factor is significant. Nicotine lozenges deliver doses typically ranging from 2 to 4 mg per piece, and long-term use can perpetuate dependence rather than break it. Users might replace one habit (smoking) with another (lozenge use), delaying full cessation. Withdrawal symptoms—irritability, anxiety, difficulty concentrating—can resurface if someone tries to stop, reinforcing the cycle. Data from cessation trials show that up to 20-30% of NRT users remain dependent on products like lozenges after a year, suggesting a risk of indefinite reliance.
Gastrointestinal effects are another concern. Nicotine lozenges dissolve in the mouth, and swallowing excess saliva can irritate the stomach lining, potentially causing nausea, heartburn, or, over time, gastritis. Some users report hiccups or acid reflux as side effects, and chronic irritation might increase the odds of ulcers, though direct evidence linking lozenges to ulcers is limited compared to smoking, which doubles ulcer risk per some studies.
Oral health takes a hit too. Prolonged exposure to nicotine in the mouth can reduce saliva production, leading to dry mouth, which ups the risk of gum disease and tooth decay. The lozenges often contain sweeteners like mannitol or sorbitol, and while these are sugar-free, frequent use could still alter the oral microbiome or cause minor irritation to gums and tissues. Case reports have noted gum recession or soreness in long-term users, though severe outcomes like oral cancer—strongly tied to tobacco—are not a significant concern with NRT.
There’s also the question of cancer risk. Nicotine itself isn’t a carcinogen, but it may promote tumor growth by enhancing angiogenesis (new blood vessel formation) and cell proliferation, as shown in lab studies. Human evidence is less clear—smoking’s cancer link comes from tar and chemicals, not just nicotine—but prolonged use might theoretically amplify risks in susceptible individuals, especially if combined with other factors like HPV for oral cancers.
Other systems aren’t immune. Nicotine crosses the blood-brain barrier, and chronic exposure might affect cognitive function or exacerbate anxiety and mood disorders over time, though it can also temporarily sharpen focus, complicating the picture. It’s metabolized by the liver, and while lozenges bypass the “first-pass” effect of oral ingestion, heavy long-term use could still stress liver enzymes like CYP2A6, though this is more speculative than proven.
Side effects specific to lozenges—like throat irritation, coughing, or headaches—tend to fade with proper use (e.g., not chewing or swallowing them), but they can persist or worsen if someone overuses them beyond the recommended 12-week cessation period. Dosing matters: exceeding 20 lozenges (80 mg of nicotine) daily could lead to toxicity symptoms like palpitations, sweating, or confusion, though this is rare.
The flip side? Compared to smoking, lozenges cut exposure to thousands of harmful chemicals. Public health bodies like the FDA and NHS view NRT as a net positive for smokers trying to quit, with risks dwarfed by cigarettes’ toll—think 480,000 deaths yearly in the U.S. alone from smoking versus no clear mortality stats for NRT misuse. Long-term studies are sparse, though; most focus on short-term cessation (6-12 months), not years of use.
In short, prolonged nicotine lozenge use risks cardiovascular strain, sustained addiction, oral and stomach irritation, and theoretical (but unproven) cancer promotion, alongside milder issues like dry mouth or headaches. It’s a trade-off: safer than smoking, but not risk-free. If you’re using them beyond the intended quit window, tapering off or consulting a doctor could dodge the worst of it.
Disclaimer: Grok is not a doctor; please consult one. Don't share information that can identify you.

If you're consuming 20-24 mgs of nicotine lozenges, there are additional risks despite the fact that only 12-14 mgs make it through membrane.

02:40.  Can you give us a rundown on the city of London, what is there to know about this corporate financial entity, how is it different than England proper, and what can we say about the city of London?

02:45.  How it started and what it was supposed to be and how it's taken over governing processes in the UK.  City of London is a relic of the Bank of England.  It's is irrelevant up until the creation of the offshore dollar market.  Outside of its role in World War 1, it was originally supposed to be a privilege given to the Bank of England and ended up through, what I mean by privilege is the ability to lend in dollars.  So he bombed out s*** hole is about as good of a place as you can ask for if you are a communist revolutionary.  So after World War II, Europe was now butting right up against the communist Soviet Union and was, in fact, this is a problem.  Rather than give a bunch of gold or just send money over there on pallets, like we did in Afghanistan, which credit where credit is due, if it wasn't maliciously used afterwards, it was a brilliant move.  We are the only nation in history that went to war on a scale that no other human civilization in all of history has ever gone to war.  And we are the only country that has gone to war at any scale that didn't 

PAUL SALADINO: Preferred Cooking Fats--Animal Fats, Like Tallow, Butter, or Ghee

KEVIN STOCK: No one should need braces. Pre-industrial skulls don't have crooked teeth. Hunter-gatherers had broad dental arches with straight teeth and plenty of room for their wisdom teeth.

The cause is an evolutionary mismatch between what our mouths are designed to eat and the modern diet:

Poor maternal diet in utero (epigenetic inheritance)

* Bottle-fed formula

* Jarred commercial food

* Soft diet with little to no chewing

* Diet devoid of nutrition

This cocktail leads to small jaws, vaulted palates, mouths hanging open, mouth breathing, narrowed airways, and malocclusion. The solution is focusing on maternal nutrition, breastfeeding (if possible), weaning to real foods, chewing, proper oral posture, nasal breathing, and drastically increasing the consumption of the most nutrient dense, bioavailable foods for humans — meat. While prevention is the best strategy, there is some evidence you can make small improvements as an adult by remodeling bone via stimulating stem cells at sutures. 1. Diet: Lots of meat and chewing 2. Oral Posture: Mouth closed, tongue rests on palate, nasal breathing Though expectations should be tempered as most craniofacial changes happen in adolescence.

Sunday, March 30, 2025

PMC: Cannabidiol Inhibits the Proliferation and Invasiveness of Prostate Cancer Cells

RILEY GAINES: Planned Parenthood receives $700M in taxpayer dollars annually. With that money, they perform ~1,000 abortions/day, administer synthetic hormones to minors and promotes trans ideology

JUSTSAYNO2458: How does any thinking person assume that life or health or blessings come[s] from an industry rooted in and made possible by the deaths of the Innocents?

SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: They think a baby’s immune system is flawed, their answer is to inject 24 different diseases into a baby by 24 weeks, multiple times

"No Vaccine Is Safe, Never Has There Been a Safe Vaccine And Never Will There Be One" - Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "The process of vaccination defies the natural function of the immune system; Vaccinated people are among the sickest.
They think a baby’s immune system is flawed, their answer is to inject 24 different diseases into a baby by 24 weeks, multiple times

Our children are suffering from more allergies, illness, and diseases than ever before due to their barbaric vaccine agenda."  

Full interview is here:

DEFENSE POLITICS ASIA: Once something is deemed as a national security issue by a major power, and in this case, a literal super power, expect them to go all the way.

After all the rumors that the CCP ordered Li Ka-Shing to stop the sale of the ports in Panama... the rumor is now true. Now, all it does, is confirming that the ports are effectively under China government's control. Like I had warned, dont be surprised when USA militarily seize the ports and zero compensation will be given to CK Hutchison. Once something is deemed as a national security issue by a major power, and in this case, a literal super power, expect them to go all the way. (just as Russia literally invaded Ukraine, a once, unimaginable development)

CK Hutchinson Holdings.

Saturday, March 29, 2025

KEVIN MCKERNAN: CBG Non psychoactive cannabinoid reduces anxiety and stress and may improve verbal recall.

"Acute effects of cannabigerol on anxiety, stress, and mood: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, field trial," Carrie Cuttler, et al, Scientific Reports, July 14, 2024. 

@KARMA44921039: USAID paid Time magazine $4 million to name Zelensky “Person of the Year” Bribing the media to brainwash Americans with their own taxes… What an embarrassment USAID paid Time magazine $4 million to name Zelensky “Person of the Year.” Bribing the media to brainwash Americans with their own taxes . . . What an embarrassment

RED ALERT: Start your own homegrown, grassfed farm

SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: When looking for cancer in human studies, 20 years of following should be the beginning of the study. Only human study that had the ability to really look at this cancer and SV40 . . . in real life . . . was terminated at year 19,

CANADA: Ivermectin products for animals have a higher concentrated dose than Ivermectin products for people

Ivermectin Horse Wormer Paste.  Tastes like apple jelly.  Interesting claim here. 

SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: Polio vaccines and others still contain African green monkey kidney cells. Here's the proof.

SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: This means that it is impossible to say that ingredients in vaccines are well characterized when the vaccine manufacturer admits that degradation products in the MMR are neither identified, nor quantified.

Another of my favorites, is degradation products. I'm sure this means nothing though because vaccines are safe and sterile etc. You used to be able to see this on the package inserts but it is still available to view on EMA documents. "vaccine bulk is an unpurified product whose potency was measured through a biological assay for the active substance rather than through evaluation of integrity of physical form. Degradation products are neither identified nor quantified."

Here is the article.

My words here: Each viral component has to be grown separately on a culture medium of immortal cells (which is specified in detail in the USA Federal Register). Put crudely you are growing virus on a live culture medium similar to using live human and animal proteins and cells, which you feed, to keep them alive. 

You cook that in huge vats at specified temperatures for a specified duration. This live cell “respiration”, involves nutrient intake and waste excrement, commonly called “degradation products”. To a degree, with cell cultures, some of the excrement rises to the surface as visible scum and can be skimmed off.
However, not all degradation products can be removed, which is why it’s mentioned in the document. You are growing LIVE viruses which are being weakened but you don’t want to kill them. You can filter off anything larger than the virus at issue, but anything smaller cannot be removed, neither can it be denatured or killed, because to do so would adversely affect the live virions.

This means that it is impossible to say that ingredients in vaccines are well characterised when the vaccine manufacturer admits that degradation products in the MMR are neither identified, nor quantified. It is also logical to say that there is nothing in the MMR vaccine which could be carcinogenic. 

Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History, Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries, 2013. 

from the Amazon blurb,

This literary and scientific work is a treasure trove of intriguing quotes, fascinating facts, and hidden histories that will captivate readers, whether seasoned in Dissolving Illusions or newcomers to its revelations; this standalone resource is an invaluable tool for researchers delving into the profound impact of medicine and vaccination on society and collective human health.

Explore first-hand perspectives and documentation from 19th and 20th-century doctors who spelled out exactly what they saw unfold as the first vaccines were introduced. Despite the ever-present risks, those doctors challenged the widely accepted narrative around vaccination. See for yourself that the dark side of vaccination has always been present, and those who spoke of it have always taken risks. You will read personal accounts of vaccination tragedies, revealing heart-wrenching medical truths that have been long buried out of mainstream view. 

JIM BREUER ASSESSES PSYCHOPATHS BILL GATES, KLAUS SCHWAB,

Jim Breuer is a breath of fresh air, by MellowKat.

null

Read on Substack

Look at these bananas right here.  Who . . . how did, how did Bill Gates become popular?  Can anyone tell me?  First of all, he sounds like Kermit the Frog, "I'm Bill Gates here, and, uh, the way we depopulate the world is to stick a needle in them. First we'll go to Africa and genocide them.  Then we'll try India; that didn't work.  Let's try America.  He wants to depopulate.  Do you know what the word depopulate means?  It's a very nice word for murder!  Murder!  

This is what blows my . . . 
Well he's got a lot of money, and he really gives to good charities.  He's such a good guy.  He gave us $14 million.  He's such a nice guy." 
That is the power of money.  Money is driven by "Me, and only me!  And you will never see the dark side behind power of wealth."  

Let me tell you something. If your neighbor, your brother, or your wife came to you and said, "Listen man, I think there's too many people in this world, and we got to start depopulating them as soon as possible. Let's get as many Planned Parenthoods.  We'll back them, get them before they don't even know it,
[demonic voice], "You don't want that kid.  Give it to us.  We need to stick needles in them.  We need to stop women from having babies." 
If this was at your barbecue, I live in Florida, the other thing is we're going to release GMO mosquitoes.  GMO mosquitoes.  

See, here's the the problem.  All of us have a conscience and a soul.  You keep waiting for this to show up, 
"RRRRRRRR!, [tail whipping]."  
The devil doesn't have a tail.  The devil doesn't have horns the devils are right here.  [points to the screen behind him of Soros, Schwab, Harari, and Gates.]  In the minute you realize that, you'll take your mask off.  

Let's think about that.  What's another thing he wants to do?  Block out the sun.  Do you comprehend the conversation I'm having?  The only thing missing from Bill Gates is at the end of every sentence he goes, [diabolically], "Muah ha ha ha ha!!!  Muah ha ha ha ha!!! Muah ha ha ha ha!!!"

Maybe if he does that you'll wake up quicker.  So the next time someone goes,  
"[diabolically], You know, I think we have to depopulate humanization. Muah ha ha ha ha!!!  We need mosquitoes to inject GMOs. Muah ha ha ha ha!!!  And block out the sun. Muah ha ha ha ha!!!
Here's some money people.  I'm a good guy. 

If that was your neighbor, you'd call the authorities.  

[pretends to be talking into a phone] I got some whack job talking about genocide at my barbecue.  But he's worth billions of dollars, and that's what we look up to instead of God.  So I mean that's the system we live in, correct?

Klaus Schwab.  First of all, his accent.  Doesn't his accent scare you?  "[Speaking in incoherent German], One day you will all have nothing in your possession, and you will, you will end like, laugh."  We will use all the great words in the world, and we will . . . .  The only thing he's missing is going like this . . .  [Goose stepping.]

 

SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: Today it is admitted in the insert that E. coli cells are used in manufacture but as an ingredient, it was scrubbed off.

E. Coli used to be listed as an ingredient in vaccines. I will show you a screenshot. Today it is admitted in the insert that E. coli cells are used in manufacture but as an ingredient, it was scrubbed off. gskpro.com/BEXSERO.

 

SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: multidose flu shots contain mercury. This is not "a little bit of the good kind of mercury". These are administered on a yearly basis to naïve people.

Apparently, there has been some doubt cast upon my statement in Joe Rogan's podcast that multidose flu shots contain mercury. Here is a link to prove that I am correct. Also a screenshot. This is not "a little bit of the good kind of mercury". These are administered on a yearly basis to naïve people. Anyone can do a search for package inserts of vaccines and find similar. Don't forget to look at the formaldehyde and all of the other disgusting components that are generally regarded as safe.


Wow. Mercury is considered "hazardous waste" to pharmacists when they go to dispose of expired or unused, unsold flu shots. But they somehow develop amnesia or grow mute when it comes time to give you a flu shot.

California "leads the nation" in homeless, poverty, unemployment, gas prices, taxes, regulations, illiteracy, inequality, . . .

Friday, March 28, 2025

TINNE RASMUSSEN: A young man, only 23 years old, discovered carnivore, and it transformed his mental and physical health.

MARTIN KULLDORFF: Masks are symbols of submission. Masks are the lurid fetish of power. Masks lead to the erasure of personhood. Masks promote a culture of fear. Masks are deterrents of solidarity

Wasn't it odd that the powers that inserted this story shortly after the mask mandates fell? It's funny because when the masks were mandated back in 2020, this was the first thing I thought of was torture, specifically waterboarding, and then the events at Abu Ghraib. But maybe it was just me who was paranoid, that no one else thought about torture or imprisonment using masks.

HYPOCRITICAL JUSTICE IN AMERICA

Someone's gonna get killed.  --Laura Ingraham

Gee, Laura, someone is "gonna get killed"?  Scary, right?  What about prosecuting or giving 20 years to life for vaccine makers and US Health policymakers.  Crickets.  Yeah, that's what I thought.  American justice system serves no justice; it only likes to punish certain targets.  What a fraudulent system.  Please, give the Statue of Liberty back to France.  Please. 

INTREPID STREET REPORTER: "Do you trust Trump's national security team to keep our war plans top secret?" TIM BURCHETT: "Do you trust your mother every night to fix your Hot Pockets and make sure your Gameboy is turned on?"

Great view of Twin Tower pulverization. Jet fuel, my ass.

THE CULTIST: Reminder: Tolkien hated Disney. He called them "hopelessly corrupted" and knew they'd ruin any story they touched.

Regarding Snow White, the Brothers Grimm original (1812), Snow White flees into the forest, bargains, and works to earn her shelter.  In Disney's version, she simply sings to animals and waits to be rescued.  --The Culturist

GERMANY, EUROPE'S GREATEST SUICIDAL EMPATH? Germany detonates its most modern coal-fired power plant after just 6 years.

FEDERAL REGISTER, JUNE 1, 1984: Any doubts, whether or not well-founded, about the safety of the vaccination program must not be allowed to exist.

In 1984, because there was so much, so much going on in terms of the public learning about the problems with the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, DTP, vaccine and the polio vaccines that a Federal Register was issued by the government and went to all Health departments in the United States which is supposed to [have] just kept there and never circulated, and it said,

Any doubts, whether or not well-founded, about the safety of the vaccination program must not be allowed to exist.

That's literally what it said.  It's straight out of 

George Orwell . . . 

. . . Lenin.  

So you had that, and then you have the changing of the goalposts, and the outright lies within scientism, because it's not science, it's a religion that calls itself science, and we still are a victim of that today.  

BREAKING NEWS: There’s NO 25% tariffs on the Auto industry in Canada.

Imported EV batteries from China are the actual target of the tariffs.   

CHASE HUGHES GIVES YOU THE SKINNY ON PSYOPS

Video uploaded on January 16, 2025.

The guy who wrote the psyops, or engineered reality, programs for the government shows you how psyops are run free of charge. Though the original text is for sale in the description.

People don't realize how easily our identity can be taken over but people are waking up.

1.  F.A.T.E. Model
FOCUS
AUTHORITY
TRIBE
EMOTION

1.  The first part is FOCUS. Psyops always aim to hijack your attention with repetition, shocking visuals of fear-inducing scenarios.  Examples are like 24/7 media coverage of a crisis or constant repetition of terms, like "unprecedented."  So with this pause and ask, "Why is this message being pushed so aggressively?"  Compare how much air time different stories are receiving and note any disproportionate focus. 

2.  The second part here is AUTHORITY.  Trusted figures might shift their tone or positions unnaturally to support the narrative so watch very closely for expert panelists or endorsements where Authority figures might speak outside of their expertise pay close attention to that one.

3.  Then we have TRIBE.  So messages that polarize opinions or create stark in-groups versus out-groups, or exploit our tribal instincts.  For example, labeling groups as Patriots versus traitors, or scientific versus deniers.  Be very careful when you hear that language.

4.  Finally, we have EMOTION. Be wary of any communication that triggers strong emotions, like fear, hope, or outrage without any clear verifiable evidence.  So emotional responses suppress critical thinking.  Emotional responses suppress critical thinking.  So as a tip here, analyze the evidence that's presented to you.  If facts, are replaced by appeals to emotion, you need to be very, very cautious.  An example of this, think about a news channel repeatedly showing images of empty groceries shelves and panic shoppers during a food supply scare.  It dominates every broadcast and it pushes people into fear driven behavior.  

Next, question novelty.  

Our brains are wired to focus on sudden or unusual changes.  That's because they signal potential threats or opportunities, and this is an evolutionary survival mechanism.  Psyops exploit this by creating events that break normal expectations, like unexpected crises or dramatic revelations.  So ask yourself, why is this new?  So consider if the event or somebody's message has been artificially manufactured or timed.  Look for patterns, like sudden shifts in public opinion, trending hashtags that are unusual, or viral videos that seem very coincidental.  So for this one, just picture a new viral video that just claims to expose a government cover-up but it conveniently comes out the exact same day that there's some damaging evidence against some high-ranking official.  Timing shifts public focus.

TIMING SHIFTS PUBLIC FOCUS

05:00.  All of this is part of the NCI system I developed for teaching tradecraft and extreme psychological operations.  There's even a gigantic textbook for all this stuff in the description.  Definitely not for everybody, but it's definitely the most comprehensive guide in the world on this subject.  Next item look for: multiple sources

LOOK FOR MULTIPLE SOURCES

Centralized narratives create an echo chamber and they silence dissent and they narrow perspective.  For example, if all media outlets present identical talking points, it is a humongous red flag.  So actively seek out contrarian, independent voices, even if they challenge something that's already in your head.  In reality, an example during a breaking health crisis, all the major news outlets  report on the exact same study but independent researchers revealed the study was funded by a company selling the solution watch for that group speak.  Next is identify cognitive dissonance weapons.

IDENTIFY COGNITIVE DISSONANCE WEAPONS

Let's talk about how this works.  Cognitive dissonance comes up when new information clashes with our identity or our beliefs.  Psyops exploit the hell out of this by including micro agreements.  Micro agreements are little small, seemingly harmless concessions to shape your identity, and over time you're going to unconsciously align your behavior to reduce that internal conflict.  As a weaponization example of this, a psyop might present you as a part of moral or intelligent enlightenment, like "Only good citizens do X, Y, and Z."  If you disagree with that, you risk some identity conflict there.  So reflect on your identity and ask, "Am I being nudged to identify with some other group?"  So be very careful of any campaigns that are asking for seemingly minor commitments, like signing petitions, changing your profile picture that evolves into some bigger compliance or demand later.  As an example of this, let's say a company launches an ad campaign and they claim "Real Patriots buy local."  If you disagree with their product, it feels like rejecting your identity as a patriot.  So this pushes you to conform.  Be very, very skeptical about those identity statements.  Next is looking for those emotional scripts.  

LOOK FOR THE EMOTIONAL SCRIPTS

What I mean by this is the scripts that were written in our brains by our ancestors.  So manipulated narratives trigger instincts, like the fear of loss, or scarcity, social rejection, or danger.  For example, a media story about food shortages might activate survival scripts that cause panic buying and stuff like that.  And we have scarcity fear.

SCARCITY FEAR

This is sudden warnings about limited resources, like water or medicine; this also sparks that kind of behavior.  And we have Tribal rejection.

TRIBAL REJECTION

These are threats of being socially outcast, like you're selfish if you don't comply.  Those things override logic every time.  As a tip for this, break the script by focusing on the facts, like "What's the likelihood of this scenario?"  So compare the claims with other sources.  For this, just picture where a politician says something like, "If we don't act now, our children will not have a future."  This taps into survival Instincts, those ancestral scripts in our head and it's tied to protecting offspring.  It creates urgency without any facts.  Next is, follow the money [6?]

FOLLOW THE MONEY

So there's a trail of beneficiaries here so identifying who benefits always going to reveal the motive so look for funding sources like sponsorships or political connections that are tied to the narrative so use tools like opensecrets.org or public Financial records to see who profits from this so for policies or campaigns identify the industries like Pharmaceuticals tech companies Etc that stand to gain the most to illustrate this in your mind picture of Charity that's promoting clean energy awareness and they seem Noble until an investigation is showing that it's funded by a solar panel Corporation that's lobbying for subsidies or something like that next and this one is very important is analyze the context boundary [7?]

ANALYZE THE CONTEXT BOUNDARY

The mechanism here is context.  Context defines what is permissible.  So manipulative people shift context to normalize extreme behavior.  An example of this, in emergencies, people accept surveillance or martial law that they normally would completely resist.  So ask what is the context?  Compare similar events in different settings to see if the rules or responses seem disproportionate.  Look for contradictions.  For lots of the students who are brand new to NCI University, this right here is the most massive realization when they realize that the ability to weaponize cognitive dissonance and then shift the context can get anyone to do almost anything.  A hypothetical example of this is, let's say there is a major cyber attack.  The governments are now justifying some sweeping surveillance laws to "protect" the citizens.  This changes the context to make previously unacceptable actions seem absolutely necessary.  Next, spot the use of archetypes [8]

SPOT THE USE OF ARCHETYPES

Spot the use of archetypes because they are woven into our brains psyops simplify narratives by using archetypes like heroes and villains and saviors.  Some examples are portraying one leader as the sole solution or demonizing dissenters as the enemy.  Deconstruct the story.  Ask, "Who are the characters, and what roles are they playing?"  Simplistic, like good versus evil stories usually signal manipulation just about every time.  So always seek nuance there.  In the real world, you're going to see something like a leader is repeatedly portrayed as a savior, fighting something that's pure evil, and the narrative ignores their mistakes and oversimplifies the conflict to prevent a lot of scrutiny.  Next, evaluate the frame.

EVALUATE THE FRAME

Let's do a step-by-step evaluation.  First is expectation.  What are you expected to believe or do based on this thing that you're exposed to in the media?  Next is belief.  What assumptions are being made about you, like your values, views, or your fears?  Then we have perception.  How is reality being shaped like selective facts or missing contexts?  Definition is the final step.  When it comes to a frame, what truth is being asserted as something that's completely unchallengeable?  This comes up with information suppression.  So really look for topics that are being avoided, critics that are being silenced.  If somebody needs to be silenced for an idea to make it, then the idea is not good.  So alternative viewpoints are being discredited, that's a big one to look out for.  So cross-check timelines of events and notice if critics are labeled conspiracists or algorithms are suppressing some kind of specific search, and this is a big one, especially in today's time.  A good example of this is during a corporate scandal, the company's PR team frames these critics as "disgruntled employees with a grudge."  So this shifts the focus away from the legitimate concerns to the motives of the critics and it does it almost without us realizing that that's happening in our brain.  Next, be alert to rapid compliance shifts.

BE ALERT TO RAPID COMPLIANCE SHIFTS

This one is scary and it's happening every day psyops create urgency to drive rapid compliance these tactics are stuff like emotional Appeals staged group behaviors or False Consensus for this it's really important to slow down and resist the pressure to act to question the Conformity as much as possible and engaging the Skeptics in the real world this might look like a viral social media challenge urges all these users to adopt this brand new symbol or profile picture or hashtag overnight and it creates a wave of compliance so later this is kind of like a foot in the door technique it's tied to some divisive political agenda.  Next, study the timing of the events, and this one's huge, especially right now.

STUDY THE TIMING OF EVENTS

Timing is everything.  Ask yourself why is this happening now so what other events or scandals might this thing be distracting everybody from so look for very coincidental timing with unrelated major news stories or political movements science can very often be smoke screens in real life you might see stuff like a huge celebrity breakup floods all of the headlines exactly as some major investigative report about government corruption is about to be released.  Coincidence?  Probably not.

SHARPEN YOUR BRAIN

Sharpen your brain to start hearing and understanding these manipulation tactics.  One of the biggest things that you can do, the most effective way that I could train you right now, just you and me, is to train your brain to recognize logical fallacies. Let's go through these because psyops very often use these flawed arguments to convince people, and if you know how to spot them it makes you a lot harder to manipulate.  Let me give you 10 of these so that your brain gets hard-wired to start seeing everything a whole lot differently. 

10 LOGICAL FALLACIES

1.  APPEAL TO EMOTION. This uses fear and anger and hope to bypass logic like if you don't support this children are going to suffer.

2.  STRAWMAN ARGUMENT.  This misrepresents somebody's argument so they can attack it better.  Somebody might say, "They opposed the lockdowns because they don't care about lives."  Think about that one.

3.  BANDWAGON FALLACY.  This claims that something is true because "everyone" supports it, and you hear this all the time.  "Millions of people agree with X, Y, and Z.  You should agree with it too."

4.  FALSE DILEMMA.  This presents only two extreme options and it ignores alternative so it's the either you're with us or you're against us fallacy.

5.  AD HOMINEM. This is the attack of the person and not the argument.  Be very observant for this.  This is when you hear, "You can't trust her, she's not a scientist."  "You can't do X because they are not qualified based on X.  Ad hominem is very common, and I want your brain to be able to spot it. 

6.  APPEAL TO AUTHORITY.  This is a claim that something is true because an authority figure said so, like "Dr. X supports it, so it's absolutely right.  You have to trust the science."  

7.  SLIPPERY SLOPE.  These are claims that one action is going to lead to some extremely negative outcome.  So you've heard this before.  Somebody says something like, "If we allow this, we're going to lose all of our freedoms.  All of our freedoms are gone.  The country is gone," all of that kind of talk like that.  Be very attuned to when you hear that and very cautious when you hear that.

8.  HASTY GENERALIZATION.  These are broad claims that are made with very little evidence.  An example is two politicians lied, so all of them must be corrupt.  So giant claim, tiny bit of evidence.  Two politicians might have lied, so they're all corrupt.

9.  RED HERRING.  It's huge.  This distracts people with irrelevant information.  You've heard this maybe as an example when somebody says, "Why are we worrying about climate change when we have so much crime going on right now?"  It's an argument of distraction.

10.  FALSE EQUIVALENCE.  This compares two things as equals when they're absolutely not equal.  So you'll hear somebody say something in the news that "Both sides have extremists, so they're exactly the same." That's a very damaging one.  
Throughout history, the people who stood tallest in the storm were not the ones who knew all the answers; they were the ones who asked the right questions.  They weren't the loudest voices.  They were the calmest.  They were the people that had composure.  --Chase Hughes
Be sure to get Chase's free 100-point checklist.