Showing posts with label 2016 Election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2016 Election. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 17, 2024

ARMSTRONG: the model forecasts that Trump should win. I do not see how the Neocons would allow a Trump victory to occur

I have said historically that the LEFT is always the most violent because the foundation of what they preach is that they are the victims of the rich. Vance actually made this point.
"The big difference between conservatives and liberals is that no one has tried to kill Kamala Harris in the last couple of months,” Vance said. “And two people now have tried to kill Donald Trump in the last couple of months.”  --Martin Armstrong


In fact, from the outset, [the Neocons] directed American foreign policy to sanction even Western companies that made pipe for all of the Russian pipelines to Europe since 1960. This has been going on for 72 years. The origin of the Neocons was actually inside the Democratic Party. They wanted the totalitarian power that Marxism created, but they were not fond of the economic equality positions. Thus they became the “conservatives” inside the Democratic Party – not the Republicans. Yet ever since, they have gathered Republicans to support their causes as well and that is typically waging war and their main goal is always Regime Change. Today, they have become an unelected silent third party that infiltrates the current administration to gain their objectives.

2024 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION BY POPULAR VOTE

2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION BY POPULAR VOTE

COMMENT: Well, based on the last 2 screenshots you posted of you asking Socrates about what if Kamala wins and then this one, it appears that even though Socrates projects a Trump / Republican win in 2024, THEY will not allow that due to what Socrates says in both posts . . . a Dow high in 2024 and a 2-year decline + a 20% – 44% decline in the DOW if Harris “wins.”
Oh crap!  Chaz

REPLY: I have always sought to differentiate my personal opinion from that of the computer. I have shown the model forecast that 4 out of 6 show that Trump should win. I have expressed my opinion that I do not see how the Neocons would allow Trump to occur. I was in a meeting in Berlin in May after the WEC in London. I stated there that I personally believed that they would try to assassinate Trump. They thought I was a little out there on that one. I explained that was my opinion because the computer overwhelmingly points to a Republican victory. The 2020 projection was 50/50 so I reported it would be a tight race.

I have said historically that the LEFT is always the most violent because the foundation of what they preach is that they are the victims of the rich. Vance actually made this point.

"The big difference between conservatives and liberals is that no one has tried to kill Kamala Harris in the last couple of months,” Vance said. “And two people now have tried to kill Donald Trump in the last couple of months.”

He added, “I’d say that’s pretty strong evidence that the left needs to tone down the rhetoric and needs to cut this crap out. Somebody’s gonna get hurt by it, and it’s gonna destroy this country.”

Look, I just know these Neocons. They will keep trying to start World War III and/or kill Trump. There is way too much at stake for them here. I think you are going to read in the future that this was a major black-ops conspiracy. They have spent their whole lives hating Russians. I cannot see them quietly fading into the sunset. Let’s see. If they kill Trump or start World War III before January, then he wins, but they have trapped his agenda into war.

Monday, January 29, 2024

As a candidate in 2016, Trump was good on vaccines. As president, not so much

Wakefield's points are alarming. 

Starts out with Trump making a comment during the 2016 presidential debates "Autism has become an epidemic."  But that comment seems to be more of a predictive programming remark for the 2020 pandemic rather than a critique of the vaccines causing autism.  

Andrew Buncombe was the US Editor of The Independent at the time of this interview where he asked Wakefield about his relationship with Trump.  

00:18. Wakefield is given the abominable label of "Disgraced doctor," a horrific lie, as he explains.  "I met him once before the election when he was running for the presidency I had a meeting at Kissimmee in Florida (on 08/11/2016) and we were there, three of us, four of us, representing the issue of autism and its link to immunization, and he interjected and said, "You don't need to tell me that vaccines cause autism.  I've seen it.  I've seen it personally." [Then Trump on tape].  

00:46. Trump: And we've had so many instances . . . people that work for me.  Just the other day, 2 years old, 2 1/2 years old, the child, a beautiful child, went to have the vaccine and came back a week later, got a tremendous fever, got very very sick, and now is autistic.

01:03. We went on to discuss the issue of the autism crisis in this country, which is set to affect one in two children by 2032, according to the CDC's own data.  If nothing is done, nothing changes, that's 80% of the boys in this country.  It's a national crisis, and that's what he wanted to discuss.  He said if he were to be elected, then he would do something about this.  My concern at this stage facing the prospect of one in two children in this country developing autism by 2032.  That is my major concern.

And what did President Donald Trump do to stem this trend?