"None of it [vaccines] is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates these things, and that's been the case since forever...up until 1973 there were no regulations and no standards for manufacturing...[then] in '86 there was [The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act]." Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Dr. Drew () how "vaccines" are not actually regulated in the U.S. by the FDA but rather only "pretend regulated." The pharma insider notes that the injections were entirely unregulated prior to 1973, and then, by 1986, protected by The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act—meaning there's no liability and thus, in effect, still no regulations. "My colleague, Katherine [Watt], traced the relevant US law all the way back to late 1700s. And so, we now have a better understanding of the regulatory frameworks in the US as it applies to all vaccines in general, and then, a much greater understanding about the COVID shots, which are EUA countermeasures and how that's regulated," Latypova says. "And...in summary, I can say none of it is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates these things, and that's been the case since forever..." "In the US, the vaccines have not been under FDA mandate until 1973," Latypova adds. "Many people don't realize that. They were not regulated at all as pharmaceuticals. They were manufactured essentially by public health service, which is predecessor of CDC, the US government, public health service." "After 1973, they technically came under FDA purview. And as you know, in '86, there was [The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and] that shielded all the manufacturers from liability; that was under Reagan." "Since then, the manufacturers of vaccines [have] had no liability. And if you have no liability for injuries or deaths that you cause, then it's as if regulations don't exist for you because you have no consequences," Latypova notes. Partial transcription of clip: "So the manufacturing, those remain great concerns. In fact, I've I've gotten additional information that it's even worse, than I thought, and the problem actually goes a long time back. Even my colleague, Katherine [Watt], traced the relevant US law all the way back to late 1700s. And so, we now have a better understanding of the regulatory frameworks in the US, as it applies to vaccines, all vaccines in general, and then, a much greater understanding, about the COVID shots, which are EUA countermeasures and how that's regulated. And...in summary, I can say none of it is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates these things, and that's been the case since forever... "So the law research is ongoing, and, Katherine and one of the colleagues are writing a big report on relevant law tracing back to, as I said, late 1700s when, you know, vaccination as we kind of know it in a modern world has, started being used more or less in mass subjects. Now, in the US, the vaccines have not been under FDA mandate until 1973. Many people don't realize that. They were not regulated at all as pharmaceuticals. They were manufactured essentially by public health service, which is predecessor of CDC, the US government, public health service. And, they were sort of, you know, you could order order the samples or whatever you needed, the box. You could even, like, order it in the mail from the US government, and they would send it to you. "And so up until 1973, there were no regulation and no standards for manufacturing, for purity testing, for contaminants, for, characterizing what you have made in the pharmaceutical process, which is standard for anybody who works in pharma making drugs. That didn't exist, really. It wasn't anything codified. After 1973, they technically came under FDA purview. And as you know, in '86, there was a national vaccine, I forget the correct name of the law, but basically, the act that came in that, shielded all the manufacturers from liability that was under Reagan. "And since then, the manufacturers of vaccines had no liability. And if you have no liability, for injuries or deaths that you cause, then it's as if regulations don't exist for you because you have no consequences.""None of it [vaccines] is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates these things, and that's been the case since forever...up until 1973 there were no regulations and no standards for manufacturing...[then] in '86 there was [The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act]."… pic.twitter.com/iqX6py1O3a
— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) October 9, 2024
GET NUTRITION FROM FARM-DIRECT, CHEMICAL-FREE, UNPROCESSED ANIMAL PROTEIN. SUPPLEMENT WITH VITAMINS. TAKE EXTRA WHEN NECESSARY
Wednesday, October 9, 2024
SASHA LATYPOVA: And, in summary, I can say none of it is regulated. The FDA kind of pretend regulates [the vaccines], and that's been the case since forever...
Monday, August 19, 2024
LATYPOVA: Three days after the DOD/USAMRDC announced that they began growing the stock of “covid virus”, the CDC captured 3000+ people from two cruise ships, Diamond Princess (arriving internationally) and Grand Princess (domestic travel, the ship never left CA)
Incidentally, fake pandemics are still the tools of the central bankers. Listen to the clip of Catherine Austin Fitts here. Transcript and clip by Sense Receptor News:
"Bird flu has nothing to do with health. It's a tool of the central bankers...when you're printing monetary inflation you need a way to create deflation on demand." Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report) Catherine Austin Fitts describes
At the time of the Grand Princess quarantine orders, in March 2020, the CDC (that had merged with the DOD via “the whole of government approach”) was the sole possessor of the “test” to determine if someone has “SARS-cov-2”. Therefore, they had the magic wand to wave around the quarantine ships, and, Eeny, meeny, miny, moe," into the military prison you go!
They further state that between January 2020 and March 2020, there has been sufficient “scientific” evidence collected showing that COVID-19 is SARS by the definitions of the cited EOs:
But of course! “Fever and signs of respiratory illness” is all that was needed, and the rest could be just asserted.
Next, they cite that by March 7, 2020, 200 “cases” (by CDC’s secret magic PCR wand that nobody else could scientifically check, validate, or verify) were found in the US (out of 300M+ population):
And because they found 20 “cases” on board the ship, everyone on the ship was now tagged “pre-communicable stage of COVID-19”:
The quarantine orders are basically an arrest without due process based on an imaginary cause. In several countries, including Canada, the EU, Australia, and New Zealand, military and police-enforced quarantine was already used in 2020. The Blob is planning the next phase of global terrorism. Under a fake/PHEIC public health emergency declaration - they can round up people into indefinite detention, like they did with the cruise passengers, or shut down any city/town/community this way.
I am publishing this material because you will not find this information in any mainstream media. Most of the “freedom community leaders” ignore this, too. Having this information and sharing with your friends and family will prepare you to face the government goons who might try to bluff their way into detaining you. Traveling and crossing international borders, especially by cruise ships, puts you in a vulnerable position. Knowledge is power.
To help you think through this matter and prepare, here is a discussion that Katherine, I, and one of our readers:
For example:
"Courts have held, however, that not all types of searches and seizures necessarily require probable cause and a warrant.
Searches and seizures conducted with the consent of an authorized person and those searches and seizures that are conducted to avert an imminent threat to health or safety do not run afoul of the Fourth Amendment even when conducted without probable cause and a warrant."
It's meant to look like a form of probable cause, warrant, due process, and judicial review, without being substantive, but instead being fake, like everything else.
After being taken into detention, a detainee can file a habeas corpus petition for judicial review under 28 USC 2241, like any other criminal, [except they haven’t been charged with a crime, but are detained for “non-law enforcement” reasons], and can also request an administrative hearing, not for constitutional or due process issues, only for medical and scientific issues.
Katherine’s post:
On habeas corpus, probable cause, warrants, detention, and extrajudicial state killing under declared public health emergencies. by Katherine Watt
Read on SubstackFrom my own very simple perspective (informed by the history of totalitarianism), I can state with certainty that following the “health” commissars to the secondary crime scene (detention center) is a bad idea no matter what law you think applies. In theory, there may exist some remnants of the constitutional procedure for you to theoretically appeal your undue imprisonment. But once you are locked up by the Red Guards, do you think that the judges that have sided with the Red Guards to date will look at your case fairly and apply the Constitution? I personally would not test this theory.
Please subscribe, comment, and if you would like to support [Sasha's work], become a paid subscriber.
Tuesday, August 6, 2024
DR. JANE RUBY: Everyone's finally figuring out that you're in a permanent kill box, a mass genocide operation being run by the United States Department of Defense…
Everyone's finally figuring out that you're in a permanent kill box, a mass genocide operation being run by the United States Department of Defense…
— DR JANE RUBY (@RealDrJaneRuby) August 6, 2024
At the end she tells you how to defeat it (Hint: LOCAL) pic.twitter.com/fgVSz5EWeh
Yeah, local does seem like the answer, and it sounds good, but some of us still need restitution from the international invasion of sinister forces from outside who've been left damaged. But local government sure has the "go local" wrapped up too from years, decades of federal funding that has turned quiet rural and suburban roads into streamlined boulevards with all the major national chain eateries--Subway, Taco Bell, Carl's Jr., Starbucks, 7-11s, nail salons, and pet stores-- and grocers, not to mention how they've converted the lighting with glaring yellow light poles every 40 feet that double as video and audio surveillance on what were locally maintained quiet streets. Now streets and city services are local counties and city restrictions to Blackrock, State Street, et al controlling companies via DEI. So the instruction may be to go local, but feds have already set up shop. And the courts are owned. You won't find justice anywhere, which explains all the street violence. And you won't find a lawyer worth his salt. Who can you trust in a low-trust society? Not to mention the added level of surveillance, Facebook groups created by high-octane Karens and Kens and the immigrant population who actually took Janet Napolitano's "If you see something, say something" as their mission statement in the service of a virtuous actor.
Wednesday, June 12, 2024
KATHERINE WATT: Naomi Klein, who [. . . supported] those pro-sovereignty/anti-globalist street-level fighters, collapsed under the Covid propaganda and lined up to call for starvation of vaxx refusers.
I just wanted to drop this here.
Latypova asked: “Can this be viewed as invasion, i.e. takeover of legislature of sovereign states by the DOD-Pharma cartel? Are the buyers effectively signing away their rights to make laws in their own countries?”
I replied:
Yes. But also, there are many, many precedents for that signing away of sovereignty over the last few decades, especially through the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (1947) as updated and institutionalized in the World Trade Organization (1995) to override laws protecting domestic industrial production rights, labor and environmental standards and intellectual property rights held by formerly-sovereign nations and people.
It can and has been viewed as invasion, mostly by people like the 1999 Battle for Seattle, anti-WEF, anti-WTO organizers and demonstrators and those who still try to demonstrate at Davos every year.
But the Soros team captured and marginalized most of those groups, especially by infiltrating and weakening the Occupy Wall Street movement just at the point OWS on the left was starting to make common cause with the Tea Party on the right through their shared critique of the corporate-state.
And then most of the public intellectuals like Noam Chomsky and Naomi Klein, who were supporting those pro-sovereignty/anti-globalist street-level fighters, collapsed under the Covid propaganda and lined up to call for starvation of vaxx refusers. (Klein wrote a 2007 book about how the Shock Doctrine works in every country around the world, and then couldn’t see it when it happened to her in her own country in real time: she condemned the Canadian truckers for fighting for humans to be free from corporate-government oppression.)
Saturday, May 4, 2024
US Gov't using health emergencies to legislate its way to permanent tyranny
Please understand that pandemics are scams. They are only declared as a way to authorize tyranny.
Know this: the United States Government's Chemical and Biological Warfare Program is currently housed in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Where was it before that? Why did they move it? Are we searching for Carmen Santiago, Waldo, or the Holy Grail? Where is it NOW? Our bioweapons program [yes, it's ours; we're paying for it] USED TO BE HOUSED in the Department of Defense (DOD). Wow! Maybe they changed locations out of convenience to us. Instead of being alarmed at the bioweapons, our government is making them like medicine. How considerate of them.
Katherine Watt explains,
Through gradual, covert statutory reclassification and program transfers, reinforced through Presidential Executive Orders and related executive branch declarations, and implemented through hundreds of regulatory amendments, the US Government's Chemical and Biological Warfare Program originally housed in the Department of Defense (DOD), became the Public Health Emergency [PHE]-Emergency Use Authorization [EUA]-Medical Countermeasures program housed in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Everybody gets the following wrong or states it only peripherally, but you ought not to forget it. The next paragraph answers the question "Who is behind the biowarfare against the American people?" Asking "Who" used to be one of the 5 basic questions journalists asked. But that dates me.
Read it a few times if you need to:
The bioterrorism program is now jointly operated by DOD, HHS, Department of Homeland Security, Department of State, most other US federal agencies and their subordinate departments, divisions, offices, authorities, enterprises, committees, advisory boards and employees, in collaboration with the World Health Organization, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and other public, private and public-private hybrid institutions around the world…
In 2022 Attorneys General of 15 states sued HHS trying to repeal the HHS’ definitions of “public health emergency”. --Sasha Latypova
What Does It Mean When Pandemics Are Declared?
Historically, epidemics could only be recognized AFTER the fact: after a substantial number of people became ill, died, and after a significant economic impact. Examples of real epidemics include mostly water-born, crowding/poor sanitation, and vermin-related diseases such as cholera, plague, typhus, and smallpox. All of these diseases are eliminated by proper sanitation of water, hygiene, and improvement in living conditions. It is not possible to predict an epidemic unless one purposefully takes measures to poison water or cause significant deterioration of people’s living standards.
In the clown-infested reality that we currently inhabit, the international government-military blob is claiming that they can predict pandemics and declare emergencies based on one fake PCR case of a made-up virus somewhere in the world.
HHS refused to amend its definitions of a pandemic and insisted that they can claim absolutely anything is a pandemic. HHS ultimately prevailed, the case was re-filed by OK and TX, the judge dismissed it and it was not appealed. In the refusal to amend its definition of a pandemic, HHS stated that “any communicable disease event” - this means a single case of anything they claim “communicable” anywhere in the world (for example, a single cow that “tested positive” for “avian flu”), once announced by the WHO, can qualify for forced testing, tracing, detention and injections of humans or animals in any town or village in any state of the US!
Wednesday, May 1, 2024
DR. ROBERT MALONE was busy in 2020 writing COVID guidebooks and faking science with famotidine for $21M for DARPA. The OTA contracts for COVID countermeasures were issued by the DOD for about $50B back then.
Dear Dr. Malone..., by @sasha_latypova https://t.co/Oc0hDUm5p7
— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) May 1, 2024
Here is the direct link to Sasha Latypova's open letter to Dr. Robert Malone. It is so worth the read.
I never knew you were also an OTA expert! That’s good to know. It would have been even better to know this right around 2020 when you were busy writing COVID guidebooks and faking science with famotidine for $21M for DARPA. The OTA contracts for COVID countermeasures were issued by the DOD for about $50B back then. It would have been great to have you utter some mention of it on Joe Rogan’s or Dark Horse podcast or some other high-profile social media venue to mislead Americans who all thought they were getting safe regulated pharmaceutical products and not unregulated, dangerous, liability-free EUA military countermeasures. Why didn’t you say anything back then? Why didn’t you say anything in the January 16 Doc Malik interview to disprove what I said about the OTA/COVID contracts? What evidence of OTA expertise can you offer other than an angry assertion that you have it? Why did you wait to claim you have expertise in this topic until non-OTA-experts,
Katherine Watt and I found and reviewed the relevant law and the contracts, and until Debbie Lerman, a journalist and not previously an OTA expert, figured out why and how HHS “partnered” with the DOD to circumvent their respective OTA restrictions? Turns out that was necessary to order a massive volume of “prototypes and demonstrations” (unregulated chemical poison) and pretend these were regulated medicines for military and civilians. Did you know this in 2020?