Showing posts with label — @realDianaWest (@realDianaWest). Show all posts
Showing posts with label — @realDianaWest (@realDianaWest). Show all posts

Wednesday, July 9, 2025

DIANA WEST: family courts [in England] to be determined by Sharia, which have all kinds of inequality for women, you know, women need for, well, this would be a criminal case, but under the Sharia, women need 4 witnesses to a rape to bring charges

What you're looking at is the confluence, the sort of affinity of totalitarianism, and what I mean by that is despotism, or we call it in a 20th century, totalitarianism, and Islam have great commonality: the control factor.  --Diana West
from Michael Farris @ "Coffee and a Mike" Show.  

4:05.  I had kind of a baptism by fire if you will in an education on Islam because at the time of 9/11 very few people knew anything about it and as I was struggling to learn I was immediately coming up against obstacles and censorship and ostracism you name it and I was very conscious of what language could be used, what the freight would bear in the public square because I was writing newspaper columns I was writing editorials at the Washington Times and also going out over the wire so I was acutely aware of what could be said, what should be said, what wasn't being said, along about a few months into all of this terrible frenzy that happened at that time after the destruction of the twin towers and the Pentagon and the plane over Pennsylvania.

7:40  The silence on Islam protects Islam.

18:14. You know they are not a fan of their government they are from there there's a reason why they left there. Some of them are Muslims, some of them are not anymore.  They are Americanized now but they're good people, right? And I'm not saying you're saying that but in just in terms of . . . 

18:38.  I was just going to say the anecdotal and the personal is not how we do statecraft however I think the wise answer to that is from a writer and ex-Muslim, named Ibn Warraq, whose book I very . . . I mean it was very happenstance.  On 9/11 or I guess it was probably 9/11 or 9/12, I went to my local bookstore.  We still had bookstores all the way back then.  This was Borders Books in Westchester County, New York that's where I lived at the time which is about an hour outside of New York City and so the Islam shelf had been pretty much cleared out when I wanted to go buy a Quran and I wanted to start getting some books cuz I was going to start writing and thinking and all of that. One of the books I came to was a book by Ibn Warraq who was an ex-Muslim, and he wrote a book called, Why I am not a Muslim, 1995, and it's very fascinating overview of all of these issues.  He loves his family.  He has family members who don't even know he left Islam and he writes under a pseudonym and he says that it's not that there is no such thing as a moderate Muslim, however, and there is no moderate Islam and so there is wiggle room for anybody inside any sort of system but the system itself is what we would call extreme it's not exceptional it is sanctioned by the Quran mainstream writings, the Quran itself, the Hadith, the Surah, all of these Macy's for the religion sanctioned these things and so whether somebody is falling away or leaves it and you have to keep that secret because apostasy is a capital crime in Islam.  You know, it is literally a death penalty offense to leave Islam.  But if you are, you know, finding a new way on your own, that's a separate issue.  But in terms of the Sharia, which we see Sharia courts I think they first started coming into England probably about 10 no over a dozen years ago, family courts to be determined by Sharia, which have all kinds of inequality for women, you know, women need for, well, this would be a criminal case, but under the Sharia, women need 4 witnesses to a rape to bring charges.  You know the inheritance laws, etc., very anti-woman.  So these kinds of things start seeping into society regardless of a moderation of an individual.  So that is kind of where I'm coming from.  It's very important to keep the tenants and the mainstream classical sources of this in mind.

22:13.  Do you feel that in all your research because I like I look at this and I think especially, let's talk about Europe for a second because to me it's the European governments these countries that allowed all this.  I mean I know Belgium is way out of hand England France Ireland my friend Matt Bracken was just over Ireland Germany, . . . 

. . . .Denmark, Norway, . . . 

. . . Spain and Italy part of this too?

22:42.  all of them, all of them to varying degrees.  You're right you're absolutely right this had to be enabled and this is where I get to the next big thought I wanted to throw around which has to do with what is sometimes referred to as the red green axis.  So red being communism green being Islam why would the two work together we were looking at the influence of these governments these are not native Islamic governments.  These are European for the most part.  I mean England has very much changed to a lot of Islamic British people who now run cities, but they are Islamic, you know, the mayors, and so on, and so many of that.  But I'm not talking about that.  I'm talking about the native born, the indigenous peoples of Europe enabled this, or their governments certainly.  What you're looking at is the confluence, the sort of affinity of totalitarianism, and what I mean by that is despotism, or we call it in a 20th century, totalitarianism, and Islam have great commonality: the control factor.

23:57.  The control of Islam is not just control controlling the politics of the world; there is the law, and there is a law that comes down to your most personal behavior, literally, including how you wash yourself and things like that, and which hand goes first in various extremely private acts. These are all written out in terms of law.  So it is a what there's been numerous historians pretty much between the middle of the 19th century and the middle of the 20th century, who made these observations about how before we come to the word totalitarian, but how despotic Islam is, the control system, law, religion, you know, culture, everything under control and written out.  And then when you marry that to the strain of Marxism that became Bolshevism first after the Russian Revolution and so on, there is a tremendous synergy between them as control systems.  And so you see numerous thinkers, experts in Sharia law, experts in communism, coming to this very interesting conclusion that I think does explain why you see this red green axis.  Look at the latest anti-Trump, anti Netanyahu protest that's been called in Washington DC outside the White House.  If you look at the sponsors

Saturday, June 21, 2025

RAYMOND IBRAHIM: [Trump] also called the treatment of Christians in the region “beyond disgraceful,” saying Christianity was being “treated horribly and very unfairly — it’s criminal.”

On June 1, President Donald Trump issued a statement to commemorate Global Coptic Day. Among other things, he said:

“Today, I join the Coptic Orthodox Christian community in observing Global Coptic Day… Tracing its roots to Saint Mark, the apostle of Jesus Christ and the evangelist who brought the Christian faith to Egypt in the first century, the Coptic Church has been a beacon of Christendom in Africa for nearly 2,000 years. The Coptic community has left an indelible mark on the hearts of millions of Christians — most evidently seen in their timeless contributions to Christian theology and culture. This Global Coptic Day, we also pause to reflect upon the vicious and ongoing persecution of Coptic Orthodox Christians in Africa and across the Middle East. In 2015, 21 Coptic construction workers were brutally executed by ISIS terrorists in Libya. Like persecuted Christians all around the world, these heroic martyrs refused to renounce their faith. They exemplified sacrificial love and steadfast devotion to God, even in the face of certain death. The Copts’ persistence amid relentless persecution is a living testament to their unbreakable resolve and fearless dedication to spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”

Trump’s statement is obviously powerful, but it’s more than that — it is rare. Unlike his predecessors, Trump has consistently acknowledged the brutal and ongoing persecution of Christians in the Muslim world, especially in Egypt, where Copts have long endured systemic violence, discrimination, and neglect.

And that persecution continues till this day. One week after Trump’s statement, the Virgin Mary Church in Luxor, Egypt, became the latest to go up in flames. So-called “accidental” church fires have become disturbingly commonplace in Egypt, with authorities reflexively ruling out arson often before an investigation even begins.  

. . . 

Nor is this a new position for Trump. During his first term, he addressed the issue bluntly. In 2020, he remarked on the “ongoing challenges facing the largest Christian group [Copts] in the Middle East,” emphasizing the need to “acknowledge the importance of religious freedom” and to “reaffirm our commitment to promoting and defending this core tenet of a free society.”

That year, he also called the treatment of Christians in the region “beyond disgraceful,” saying Christianity was being “treated horribly and very unfairly — it’s criminal.”

Perhaps most memorably, following the 2017 massacre of 28 Copts — including 10 children — by Islamic gunmen in Egypt, Trump stated:

“This merciless slaughter of Christians in Egypt tears at our hearts and grieves our souls… America makes clear to its friends, allies, and partners that the treasured and historic Christian communities of the Middle East must be defended and protected. The bloodletting of Christians must end, and all who aid their killers must be punished.”

More from Raymond Ibrahim.

Saturday, June 14, 2025

LINUXHIPPIE: the resistance movement wants "legitimacy," and if the Trump Admin continues to be overwhelmed by "Staged Dramatics" and fails to respond to open defiance of Federal Law by Governors, Mayors, et al, they will likely succeed in achieving their minimum success criteria....negation of the current Admin's agenda

Sen Minority Leader Schumer sponsoring Legislation (No Kings Act, 2024) echoing the already "trademarked" and merchandized "No Kings" riots planned for this weekend (to coincide with US Army Birthday celebration---negating it) --linuxhippie

2) From a purely objective POV, the coincidence of Judicial Interference (Judges reference No Kings) to Sen Minority Leader Schumer sponsoring Legislation (No Kings Act, 2024) echoing the already "trademarked" and merchandized "No Kings" riots planned for this weekend (to coincide with US Army Birthday celebration---negating it)..... The continued theater by Democrat Politicians about "kneeling" to the executive (they had no problem kneeling for a drug addicted criminal when it suited them btw) and last but not least____THE DEAFENING SILENCE OF THE SENATE MAJORITY LEADER THUNE........

Are clear indicators that the "Mass Line" has been established and the "Movement" toward confrontation is well underway. 

5) When a Marxist Insurgency being lead by State Gov, City Mayors, and Federally Elected Senator's and Congressman is allowed to deploy across the Nation..... When those same people are openly calling for Troops (Ted Lieu) to disobey orders "they" deem unlawful (sedition?) and the Senate Majority Leader of the Presidents own Party remains silent........we have a problem. That problem becomes existential when those who advise the President and provide him counsel don't recognize it with this level of clarity. The theater with Sec Neom is an indicator (the Sen should've been charged) and the march to his office (Thune should've thrown them out and warned them they were in violation of Senate Rules).....

Indicate we are right back where we were when last we had a President Trump. The GOP is the Controlled Opposition (i.e., they are allowing events by not intervening) and the entire Democrat Party is the violent splinter..... 

6) In order to defend, one must know what is being attacked and the what the enemy's goals are. To be confused about this is to be "Strategically Dislocated" and ensures that responses will likely be "under-inclusive" to the threat and will fail. That is the goal of all this noise, and it's working. It's keeping the Admin in a "action/reaction" cycle that the left controls. As crazy as the left "APPEARS" to be on the street, those organizing these events are completely sane and have very clear objectives in mind. They have templated actions to achieve a "minimum success criteria" (a DST Decision Support Template) and are prepared to overachieve.

7) "Negotiated Settlement" is always the goal when the Insurgency doesn't have the combat power to overthrow by force of arms the existing Government. "Dialogue and Praxis" slowly, overtime, erodes the targets ability to generate a coherent defense of what is being attacked. (that's where we are) Open Communications like "No Kings" is C3 of the resistance movement. They want "legitimacy" and if the Trump Admin continues to be overwhelmed by these "Staged Dramatics" (Noem event) and fails to respond to open defiance of Federal Law by Governors, Mayors, and State/ Local Law Enforcement, they will likely succeed in achieving their minimum success criteria....negation of the current Admin's agenda and place Trump's Presidency (that YOU voted for) in jeopardy. (GOP's goal)

Wednesday, March 26, 2025

The whole introduction, mandate, and enforcement of masks on shoppers, on employees, on patients visiting is simply a society-wide abuse along the lines if Abu Ghraib in Iraq some 20 years ago in 2004.