AMY MEK: “Peace” only exists after Islamic authority is unchallenged. It is the condition that follows dominance — not coexistence. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Indonesia, and others do NOT define peace the way Americans do.

Truth. https://t.co/i6AcAjbZOn

— @realDianaWest (@realDianaWest) November 18, 2025

  WARNING: The Word “Peace” Is Being Weaponized - And Americans Need to Pay Attention

Everyone keeps celebrating the word “peace,” but almost no one understands what it means to the foreign governments listed in this announcement. In the West, “peace” means coexistence, stability, and freedom. But to the regimes applauding this “Board of Peace,” the word means something entirely different: In Islamic political doctrine: “Peace” only exists after Islamic authority is unchallenged. It is the condition that follows dominance — not coexistence. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Indonesia, and others do NOT define peace the way Americans do. To them: Peace = submission Peace = influence and control Peace = the moment the West stops resisting In communist doctrine: “Peace” only arrives after capitalism is defeated and the world accepts socialist dominance. China and Russia openly teach that true peace requires: the end of Western power the end of free markets the victory of their ideology The common thread: All of these regimes define “peace” as the stage after the West is conquered - politically, ideologically, or economically. Not before. So when this many authoritarian, Islamic, and communist governments unite behind something called a Board of Peace, Americans should not be celebrating - we should be asking: Whose definition of “peace” are we agreeing to? And what does it cost the West? Because the truth is simple and uncomfortable: When these countries say “peace,” they mean power. When we say “peace,” we mean freedom. Those two things are not the same - and they never have been.