Monday, September 30, 2024

TOM LUONGO: Socialized Medicine. It's welfare all right... for paper pushers and HR nannies

Posted by at No comments:

MIND-BLOWING REVELATION🔥 Please stop and think about the implications of what's explained here. (1/3)

THIS is why it's IMPOSSIBLE to "vaccinate" against anything. THIS is why "vaccines" are the PERFECT POISONS. THIS is why eugenicists like Bill Gates love "vaccines." Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for James Delingpole (@JMCDelingpole) how "vaccines," essentially, work in the exact opposite way as we're told they do—meaning it's literally impossible to make a vaccine that does anything but poison somebody. While we're told that "vaccines" work by giving us a small amount of a toxic substance—e.g. a bacteria or virus— in turn allowing us to create immunity against future infections, what the injections actually do is make us vulnerable to said toxins. Furthermore, "vaccines" prime our bodies to react badly to *anything* that's injected into us, including benign substances like milk or egg proteins. Hence the proliferation of allergies, such as allergies to milk, eggs, wheat, peanuts, etc. Incredibly, Latypova explains how this has been known since 1913, when Charles Richet—a French physiologist and self-proclaimed eugenicist—won a Nobel Prize for figuring out that injecting animals with toxins primes them for harmful or deadly reactions if they encounter the same toxins in the environment, even in small amounts. He called these reactions "anaphylactic" reactions, but said that these reactions also included allergies. After researching this topic and analyzing Richet's work, Latypova says she's come to the conclusion that "everybody who is . . . closely familiar with this history and work cannot think that it's possible to vaccinate." The pharma insider adds, "It's impossible to vaccinate for anything. And Richet has demonstrated it conclusively and was given Nobel Prize for it...because he figured out how to poison everyone by sensitizing them to the most commonly occurring things in their environment." "It's the most ingenious way of poisoning," Latypova says. "The eugenicists never went away. They all still think that way. They all still think that they should poison us and limit our reproduction because, you know, we're polluting the earth now. We're causing climate change," Latypova adds. "They're brainwashing themselves and their followers into thinking that this is actually acceptable. It's acceptable to poison people. It's acceptable to sterilize people. It's acceptable to lie to people because it's for the greater good. So what started with Richet continues today." Partial transcription of clip: "One of the historical examples, Katherine [Watt] and I ran into, and this became a huge, epiphany for me is, Charles Richet, who was a French researcher in that time. So he worked in early 1900s. In 1913, he was given Nobel Prize for this work, and he is credited with the work on anaphylaxis, although he wasn't the only one, but so he received the Nobel Prize. And so that to me, you know, opened so much kind of I was like, of course. You know, why didn't I see this before? But, basically, you know, when you look at this work and then when you look at what preceded and what went after, you kind of understand a few things. "First of all, everybody who is, let's say, closely familiar with this history and work cannot think that it's possible to vaccinate. It's impossible to vaccinate for anything. And Richet has demonstrated it conclusively and was given Nobel Prize for it...because he figured out how to poison everyone by sensitizing them to the most commonly occurring things in their environment. It's the most ingenious way of poisoning. "He was a committed eugenicist. And at that time, you know, everyone should realize, eugenicism was a fashionable society attitude. So, you know, all the well-to-do classes were subscribing to it. The good breeding was always, you know, promoted. And, at the time, the sentiment was, well, how can we help the poor be less dirty and less numerous? Make them less humorous. And AKA kill them. Because this side of them is so offensive to us when we ride our horses through the park and, you know, and then there's like them. What can we do about it? And what can we do about it became into let's figure out how to control their, overbreeding because they tend to reproduce too much, and they tend to live in crowded conditions, and they tend to have poor hygiene and no sanitation. "So instead of working on those issues, they will decide, oh, let's vaccinate them. And, actually, the same same thing continues with Bill Gates in Africa and India for the same reason. And, you know, but all of these thoughts extended now to us, to normal people. "Now all of the globalist and this, you know, elite. [aka, the parasitic class], I don't call them elites, but they all think of us that way. That's, you know, that's what people need to understand. The eugenicists never went away. They all still think that way. They all still think that they should poison us and and limit our reproduction because, you know, we're polluting the earth now. We're causing the climate change. Whatever those ideas are, but they're brainwashing themselves and their followers into thinking that this is actually acceptable. It's acceptable to poison people. It's acceptable to sterilize people. It's acceptable to lie to people, because it's for the greater good. You know? So what started with Richet continues today."
Posted by at No comments:

TOM LUONGO: The desperation here is all on the part of the people who have the most to lose by Trump returning to power, and that would be Europe and the British.

9:09  No, this is a narrative that they're setting up here because they want to kill Trump but they want to blame somebody else for it, then, of course, they get the twofer with the ability to say well, Iran killed Trump, so we have to go to war against Iran.  The desperation here is all on the part of the people who have the most to lose by Trump returning to power, and that would be Europe and the British.  It's always the same people over and over again.  They need a war to cover the fact that they're defaulting.  They need to default.  They're going to default.  There's nothing they can do to stop it, even with Powell cutting interest rates by 50 basis points the other day, the markets had sold off in ways that they shouldn't have. 
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

TRACY SHUCHART: Grocery stores only carry 3 days of supply on average

"Grocery stores only carry 3 days of supply on average," Tracy Shuchart.  

There are thousands of Bidens in the Federal government.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

SOLARI REPORT: Tennessee State Senator Bill Powers and Representative Jeff Burkhart are Solari Heroes of the Week for passing a bill that excludes central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) from the definition of “money” and “deposit accounts” under Tennessee Code.

Tennessee State Senator Bill Powers and Representative Jeff Burkhart are Solari Heroes of the Week for passing a bill that excludes central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) from the definition of “money” and “deposit accounts” under Tennessee Code.

It is noteworthy that this bill, as enacted, also rules out international and intergovernmental CBDCs, not just CBDCs issued by the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank. This shows foresight on the part of Senator Powers and Representative Burkhart. The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and other international organizations have been touting the idea of a CBDC for some time, making a national U.S. entity only one potential source of this threat to financial transaction freedom.

Congressman Mark Green, a former Tennessee State Senator, also provided support for this legislation and merits acknowledgment.

Senator Powers and Representative Burkhart did an excellent job successfully bringing SB 2219/HB 1901 through various committees and securing overwhelming bipartisan support on both the House and Senate floors. Solari applauds and commends the two legislators for their leadership. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

12:28  They burn down the factory to get insurance money.  That's the low-end guys.  Not the high-end, BYD, EV manufacturers.  So, yeah, there is deflation and there is restructuring going on and it's going to take time for China to move away from the lower-end to the high-end stuff up the value chain and for these traditional factories that work for the West to migrate to something else.  That's going to take time.  That's why I see and actually translates into the real estate market as well because the biggest buyers of Chinese real estate are the small factory owners in China.  They were making money for the last 20 years, right?  And now they have to scale back?  Well, they're not buying as many properties in China even when prices have gone down by 50%

13:35  So these small factories that are at the low end of the value chain that are losing market share over to Southeast Asia, some of them are already closing, how much of an impact is this transition going to have on the overall economy, or is it an impact, yes, but the overall Chinese economy can weather this storm and come out of this transition you're talking about in a more powerful way where they don't have as much low-end? 

14:06  So the low-end guys, what they've been doing is opening factories overseas.  Some of them even open factories in Mexico, right?  How do I know?  Because I'm in the industry; I mean these are the people I know.  But then some of the money comes back to China because their families are in China.  They're not really immigrating to Mexico.  I mean they're running a factory in Mexico.  They're running a factory in Vietnam, right?  But they're still living, their families are still living in China, so a lot of that money is still going back to China, right?  So that's part of it.  So that's how they contribute to the Chinese economy.  Another thing that is happening is that some of these low-end guys are trying to find the value chain themselves to make products that have high value, right, for the West.  So we that happening, but again it takes time.  So this transition right now is definitely a painful period for China, for sure, we can see that with the deflation that is happening but I expect it to change or transit out of it by probably the next 3 to 4 years.  That's what I see. 

15:42  Interesting.  It sounds like from what you're describing that the low-end which is being impacted the greatest over there, the low-end manufacturing, they're actually, many of them, not all of them, are adapting already or maybe got out in front of this by moving some of their operations to other countries. 

16:05  Yes, and also some of them are trying to manufacture for the domestic market in China.  Because of what's happening China also online shopping, like Alibaba has really picked up steam in the last couple of years, right, and a lot of factories have sales direct from factory to consumer, who in China we call it
Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

Pay attention to the framing by the Longshoremen union. The Common Man knows the government is printing money and giving it to cronies. The port workers will strike until they get some of the printer proceeds. If they are successful expect this to be replicated by others.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Healthcare System Performance Compared to Spending

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Private pilot Garrett Mitchell on FB is currently helping hurricane victims.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

OWEN BENJAMIN: I’ve been thru quite a few catastrophes and apocalypses and it’s a recurring pattern. They don’t destroy they reveal

Owen Benjamin makes a good point, 

I’ve been thru quite a few catastrophes and apocalypses and it’s a recurring pattern. They don’t destroy they reveal. It’s actually to help you.

One thing they reveal is the value that a community puts on life, on its life and survival. In whose hands did the community put its responsibility to main and lead? 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Outside of the Federal Gov't, This Is What Each State Gives Israel Annually

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

China unveiled its hydrogen-powered train at a trade fair in Germany.

Instead of committing to developments that improve life in the country, we're engaged in a perennial propaganda war, a logistics war, a political war, and a cultural war, all of which we are losing.  We're losing people to a replacement society.  And that has to come from the old colonial European powers who want to extinguish their descendants who have a memory of the Constitution and of revolutions and wars that brought us America.    but most of all a spiritual battle.   

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Sunday, September 29, 2024

Truckers are reporting an active tire slasher interrupting their routes in eastern states.…

This is the second report I'd heard of slashing truckers' tires.  Didn't realize this country hired so many terrorists to sabotage relief efforts.  These activities have the vibe as Maui summer of 2023.

Posted by at No comments:

Hurricane Helene, September 28, 2024

Definitely will be a major clean-up effort.  

Chimney Rock, North Carolina.   

It looks like Governor de Santis of Florida was prepared unless the storm and its greatest impact missed large swathes of that state.  Why couldn't the other states prepare?  Is it a wealth issue?  Or do the governors know that they'll be enriched through federal Emergency Management Administration?

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

The Vicious Ways Women Compete - Dr Tracy Vaillancourt


00:00. Do women have an intolerance of sexy peers?

00:05. Absolutely.  100%.  We say we don't we say that we just love women and we promote women but we love certain women and we promote certain women so yeah we're not the angels that we purport to be I think we do a lot of impression management.

00:29.  Who are the women support that we do support in love? 

00:34. It depends.  Obviously we're going to have different qualities that we admire in a person, so, if they have those and that's who we're going to promote we're pretty good at tolerating our friends and promoting our friends, but I don't think we are universally kind to all women.  And it's interesting because I think that there's been this change in Zeitgeist where people or women talk about the "Sisterhood has never been stronger and we support each other unconditionally," and yet we really don't.

19:35. There's a number of interesting studies going on at the moment to do with female sports I think tennis players in basketball players on opposite teams given that you've been doing your ethnographic in place what have you observed about inter, intra team love and distaste and all that stuff.

19:58.  I've noticed so much and in fact I've studied a lot of the things that I've noticed one of the things that I've noticed and then we actually have a study that show this to be true more so for adolescent girls than for adolescent boys but adolescent girls make a lot of social comparisons is she prettier than me is she better than me is she smarter than me is she more popular those social comparisons elicit jealousy and the way that jealousy is manage is either it's turned inward maybe come depressed and anxious or the like or I'm not as good as so and so or they turn it outward which is more common and they tear down their rival so the only reason that she's playing Left fullback and I'm a left fullback is because her dad's the coach or her mom's coach that sort of thing

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

[GOV'T AGENCIES] cannot suspend constitutional rights on the whim of a statute.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

JOE LAURIA: [Putin] restored the sovereignty of this country, the dignity of Russia, and that pissed off a lot of people on Wall Street and in Washington

[Putin] restored the sovereignty of this country, the dignity of Russia, and that pissed off a lot of people on Wall Street and in Washington.  --Joe Lauria

The speaker is Joe Lauria, a contributor to Consortium News.

00:00. And now we see a revival of that because the Neocons are pushing to send missiles deep into Russia which could cause a nuclear exchange.  So they are then infused with this idea that they could use nukes, we can do it, the same sick world-dominating mentality.  Before this event, we were having a chat, we did a round table, and Scott was saying that the US is the rabid dog in the world.  The United States is seen by us . . . it's very hard for people to realize that we could be the bad guys, that our government is bad, and that gives a lot of advantage to the government.  And through the media pushing their public or noble lie that we are special people, we are exceptional, we bring democracy to everyone, we only care and only want to do good in the world that's only those bad guys, those Russians, those Iranians.  What a coincidence that those are the really ugly countries, the ones that the US wants to get out of the way for various reasons.  Because Russia, if you see, and I'll get to this . . . .  In 1948, the US made a deal with Mikola Lebed, a right-hand man of Stefan Bandera, who was the fascist Ukrainian leader during the war.  He killed thousands of Poles and Jews.  They brought him to New York City, and they set him up in an office in 1948, a year after the CIA was born, and they put him in that office.  Then they sent him to Ukraine for sabotage and propaganda operations.  Now Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, of course, so they went to Soviet Ukraine to work to undermine the Soviet Union.  They wouldn't touch Bandera by the way.  The British did, and MI6 worked with Bandera and, of course, the KGB finally assassinated him in 1959.  But the Americans worked with this guy, Lebed, until 1991, until Independence in Ukraine when the Soviet Union collapsed.  And when the Soviet Union collapsed, Wall Street rushed in and saw an incredible country.  The resources of Russia were beyond any other country, the territories large with gold, gas, oil, and all kinds of other minerals there.  This is a prize, and they went in there and they acid-stripped a formerly state-controlled and state-owned economy and then enriched themselves unbelievably in the process, created this oligarchy class and impoverished the Russian people.  I went to Moscow in 1995 under Yeltsin.  I couldn't believe what I saw, a Wild West.  Hundreds of people living in front of the train stations burning fires trying to survive outside.  Cops taking bribes right in front of me on a cab that I was in from the cab driver, they didn't care.  Two guys saw my camera, and they came running after me. I had to ditch them in the Moscow Metro.  Wild scenes.  Exactly 20 years later, that was October 1995; in October 2015, I went back again to Moscow.  It was a complete coincidence, that exactly 10 years later, I'd left Berlin and I thought I was still in Western Europe.  Clean, orderly.  Why? What happened?  This is not the crazy country that I . . . .  Putin, who we don't have any real right to say whether he should rule this country or not; that's up to the Russian people.  [Putin] restored the sovereignty of this country, the dignity of Russia, and that pissed off a lot of people on Wall Street and in Washington.  His 2006 Munich Security Conference speech, listen to that.  He says, "they [the U.S.] were not supposed to expand NATO, and now you're expanding NATO.  You're just playing us for fools.  We're not going to take it anymore."  And guess what?  From 2006 to 2022, 16 years, he did take it, but he didn't take it anymore.  And that's what led us to this invasion, the overthrow of [Viktor] Yanukovych, and then the launching of a civil war against Russian speakers in the east of Ukraine, who were defending democracy.  They had voted for Yanukovych, and it was overthrown in a coup.  [The West] called it a revolution.  Tell me one revolution where a democratic-elected government was overthrown.  Revolutions [war against]  kings and dictators.  This was a coup that the US organized.  Why?  Because Yanukovych decided he was going to take a Russian economic package and not the EU one, so they overthrew him and then a Civil War was launched.  Thousands of people were killed over 8 years in Donbass that was launched with U.S. help, and they were training Ukraine forces; NATO was training the Ukrainian forces, arming them.  It was a defacto NATO State already.  And we then learn from Angela Merkel after she left office, the German Chancellor, that they purposely did not implement a deal that the Russians worked very hard with the Germans and the French to sign, which was the Minsk Accords.  The UN Security Council endorsed it unanimously. The US voted for it.  This was supposed to allow eastern Ukraine to remain inside Ukraine [and] have autonomy, and Merkel admitted that they never took that seriously for a minute.  They used the time.  They were buying time to arm Ukraine.  Then in 2021, of course, in December, the Russians offered a treaty to NATO, and a treaty to the United States to create a new security architecture in Europe.  [The Russians] couldn't put up with this anymore.  They tried that in 2008.  It failed.  They repeatedly tried this, and now, after that failure, Putin said "If you don't take these deals or negotiate these deals, we will take military-technical measures."  What does that mean?  They wanted, the US wanted this invasion.  Biden needed it, he said so in Poland.  The aim here is to overthrow Putin.  Lloyd Austin also said it's to weaken Russia.  They needed to do this through an economic war and an information war and a ground proxy war.  They're losing all three.  Only people in the United States and Western Europe believed any of the crap about Ukraine, sorry.  And why?  Because the history is not there.  It's being excised, it's being taken out, and the Russian point of view is being removed they are de-fanging journalism on purpose because we are meddling with the state narrative, the noble lie.  Speaking of which, I invited Howard Zinn, the Great American historian, late now, great historian, to the UN to address UN correspondents, and I asked him then, what is the American Noble lie?  Without any hesitation, he said Democracy.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

MARY HOLLAND:🔥"The PREP Act, it...displants all law, and that can't be right...we absolutely have to get rid of the PREP Act. We have to get rid of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and we have to restore true prior free and informed consent."

🔥"The PREP Act, it...displants all law, and that can't be right...we absolutely have to get rid of the PREP Act. We have to get rid of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and we have to restore true prior free and informed consent." (1/2) Children's Health Defense CEO Mary Holland (@maryhollandnyc) describes for retired pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas how the PREP Act—which provides immunity from liability, except for willful misconduct, for entities involved in the development, manufacturing, distribution, and administration of medical countermeasures during a public health emergency declared by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service—must be repealed. "The PREP Act, it...displants all law, and that can't be right...we absolutely have to get rid of the PREP Act," Holland says. She notes that the latest wildly egregious usage of PREP Act cover occurred in Vermont, where the state's supreme court ruled that the Windham Southeast Supervisory Union that oversees the public school system was immune from legal challenges brought by parents of a child who was "accidentally" given a COVID injection. See the story link in tweet two. Furthermore, Holland says that "We have to get rid of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and we have to restore true prior free and informed consent." Partial transcription of clip: "A terrible decision just came down from the Vermont Supreme Court that in a case where parents, said that they didn't want their child to get a COVID shot, but the COVID shot was given anyway at school. The case that the court dismissed it, saying, "Well, it's the PREP Act." The PREP Act, it suggests that it displants all law, and that can't be right. And that's one of the things it's a stepping stone in that fight against the PREP Act. But we absolutely have to get rid of the PREP Act. We have to get rid of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and we have to restore true prior free and informed consent. People need to be able to make their own health decisions on an individual basis. "We are not all the same. The idea that everybody gets the same I mean, so crazy, It's so at odds with everything else in medicine. Right? What's your weight? 

What's your height? What's your What's your medical history? That's normal medicine or used to be normal. And then they come out with a chemical that's in a bottle that you can't test, and they wanna have it be one size fits all. It's absurd." 

Story Link. 

Complete interview with Dr. Paul Thomas and Mary Holland.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

SARHA WAGENKNECHT: The USA, in particular, has seen our energy price crisis as an opportunity and has set up a huge subsidy program for themselves with the Inflation Reduction Act, 2022.

from Bundestag member, Sahra Wagenknecht, 

00:00. Cheap gas from Russia with long-term supply contracts has been an important reason for Germany's economic success for decades.  With the outbreak of the war, the suspension of ineffective, nonsensical sanctions against Russia, which, however, have greatly damaged us, and the explosion of the pipelines [2022], gas, and thus all energy costs, have risen steeply.  Even if the Greens like to claim other things, the electricity prices for an average household are still around 36% above the 2019 level.  For large-scale consumers in the industry, the electricity prices are even 83% above the 2019 prices.  This means a massive location and that's a problem for all of us.  Instead of cheap gas from the pipeline, we are now buying expensive liquid gas from the USA, or from such exemplary democracies as Qatar  However, this LNG, in other words, liquid gas, is not only significantly more expensive but also significantly more environmentally harmful because it first has to be transported around the world by heavy oil-powered tankers until it arrives [in Germany].  The Greens obviously have no problem with that and a fifth of the industrial value-added products in Germany are now massively endangered.

01:24. The industry prefers to invest in foreign countries or relocate production entirely like China or the USA.  The USA, in particular, has seen our energy price crisis as an opportunity and has set up a huge subsidy program for themselves with the Inflation Reduction Act, 2022.  This promotes their own economy and should encourage European Industries to emigrate to the USA with success.  More than half of large industrial companies are already considering relocating their production abroad, and we have to spend more money on energy and have less money in our pockets for a restaurant visit or just for a stroll through the city center.  More than a fifth of us can no longer afford a one-week holiday a year.  Countless people are at risk of losing their jobs, and the German economy is at risk of losing its engine.  

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

THOMAS MASSIE: John Kerry and other elite democrats hate the Constitution. They see it as a road block to ruling over people. As a matter of fact, that is why it was written.

Posted by at No comments:

Saturday, September 28, 2024

Bravo, Renato Moicano!

The UFC fighter is Renato Moicano. Following his victory in Paris, he lets the French government and Macron have it. Bravo, Renato!

One of the best books you'll read on ruling systems in your lifetime.  Democracy--the God that Failed: The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy, and Natural Order (Perspectives on Democratic Practice), Hans-Hermann Hoppe, 2001.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

GEORGE WILLIAM WINTERBURN:Acting on his [Jenner’s] suggestion, the King of Spain, in 1804, ordered all the children in the Foundling Hospital of Madrid to be vaccinated with goat-pox

The original vaccine (Vacca is Latin for cow) used “cowpox” to supposedly defeat smallpox, as the vaccine promoter Edwards Jenner claimed. It was not a nice, clean hypodermic needle after you cleaned the arm with alcohol, as you might imagine. Vaccination involved using a lancet, which was a sharp knife, to make scratches and cuts repeatedly into an arm and then insert the “vaccine virus” into those freshly made incisions. That “vaccine virus” was more often than not from someone’s arm, as arm-to-arm vaccination was practiced for 100 years. The original material could have been from a cow, horse, goat, donkey, sheep, buffalo (often used in India), or other animal, or even smallpox lesions scratched onto an animal from someone who had smallpox or from a corpse of someone who had died from smallpox. “Jenner believed that smallpox, swine-pox, cow-pox, and grease [horse-pox] were merely varieties of the same disease… He employed the grease virus (horse-pox) in a large number of cases and furnished it to other vaccinators... Acting on his [Jenner’s] suggestion, the King of Spain, in 1804, ordered all the children in the Foundling Hospital of Madrid to be vaccinated with goat-pox.” [George William Winterburn, PhD, MD, The Value of Vaccination: A Non-partisan Review of Its History and Results, 1886, F.E. Boericke, Philadelphia, pp. 36–37.] “In the report of the Local Government Board of London, Eng., for 1906, it is admitted that the virus then used was obtained from the deadhouses on the smallpox hospital ships because they found it most effective. This vaccine was called corpse virus, and it cannot be denied that it carried with it the frightful danger of inoculation with cadaveric poison, one of the most deadly toxins known to science.” [Audubon Republican, February 28, 1918.] Unsurprisingly, this mystery mixture, which was being used as the best medical “science” of the time, was inadvertently mixed with blood, fungus, and bacteria. “With the best of care, heavy bacterial contamination of vaccine lymph is inevitable during its preparation, and as many as 500 million organisms per ml. may be present…” [V. N. Krishnamurthy, “Effects of Penicillin and Streptomycin on Vaccine Lymph,” BMJ, vol. 2, no. 4687, November 4, 1950, pp. 1035–1047.] So, it’s not hard to imagine many people getting enormously sick or even dying from such a procedure. Many doctors noticed this, but they were the minority, and the mythology of “safe and effective” had already been deeply embedded and persists to this day. “Is there any wonder with such abominable fouling of the human body [vaccination], that consumption, scrofula, syphilis, cancer, and the whole vile train of skin diseases, should start up, and rage on with maddening intensity, making life miserable, swelling, to a dreadful extent, the bills of mortality, and curtailing by many years, the length of human life?” — Dr. Samuel Eadon, M. A. Gloucester, England [“Medical Opinion on Vaccination,” Journal of Hygeio-therapy, vol. II, no. 2, February 1888, p. 34.]
Posted by at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , ,

INSANE: The Irish government has vowed to mass arrest citizens who refuse to take the mRNA jabs during the next pandemic.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Friday, September 27, 2024

Kidnap and Kill: An FBI Terror Plot

Posted by at No comments:
Posted by at No comments:

NAOMI BROCKWELL: HIPAA is legislation that stripped individuals of the right to consent to medical data sharing

HIPAA, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.   

HIPAA doesn't protect your medical privacy at all and your medical data is being shared all over the place with millions of entities and this is explicitly permitted by the law itself.

A lot of people think that HIPAA actually protects their medical information.  It doesn't!

So this is the first video in a series that explores medical privacy and it's a doozy.  First of all, it's really difficult to get any transparency into the data sharing that goes on in the medical field but I chatted with three people who have managed to get a peek behind the surgical curtain of the behemoth Health Data industry.  There's Twila Brace, a nurse and president of a non-profit that fights for medical privacy.  There's Rob Frommer, senior attorney with a pro bono Law Firm that is currently fighting the state of New Jersey for unlawful infant Medical data collection, and Keith Smith, co-founder of the Surgery Center of Oklahoma and a practicing anesthesiologist. 

What I learned from them and from diving deep into this Rabbit Hole really blew my mind.  Essentially, the state of medical privacy is a mess.  Throughout this series, we explore electronic health records, their vulnerabilities to hacking, and how they share our sensitive Health Data with government entities and all kinds of other third parties.  We uncover how medical practitioners are financially incentivized to collect excess information from you to feed this data machine.  We talk about the warehouses of baby DNA being collected at birth in almost all states in the USA without parent consent no this isn't about a conspiracy theory there have already been lawsuits against Texas Minnesota Michigan and New Jersey for this practice and in this video we'll focus on HIPAA understanding what HIPAA actually is and how it came to allow our data to be shared without us even knowing we'll specifically look at how we've been tricked into thinking we had privacy and steps we can take to reclaim control of our medical data.

So let's begin by understanding the history of how HIPAA came to be.

HIPAA, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.  Clinton, "It offers Opportunity by allowing people to take their health insurance from job to job."

A lot of people don't realize that HIPAA was originally created to make it easier to share medical information for the purpose of insurance.  it set the stage for the eventual digitization of Health records, creating standards for the sharing of that electronic data and expanding who is allowed to get access to information without needing patient consent. Twiler Brace, "HIPPA is permissive data sharing rule."

We can learn more about the goals of HIPAA by looking at those who were pushing for it. We'll dive into entities who stood to benefit financially from the digitization and standardization of medical data sharing in the next video.  But in this video, I want to focus on the government as an organization that played a huge role in shaping and advocating for HIPAA, like the HHS, or the Department of Health and Human Services.  You might not have heard of HHS, but it's one of the largest federal agencies and you've almost surely heard of a bunch of the agencies that fall under their purview.  For example, the CDC, or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  The FDA, or Food and Drug Administration, and the NIH, or the National Institutes of Health all fall under the HHS.  They are also responsible for overseeing Medicare and Medicaid.  Given the extensive responsibilities of HHS, the agency has strong incentives to make it easier to collect medical data, to streamline programs, combat waste, and leverage patient information for research and analytics.  Before HIPAA, the government's ability to access medical data was more limited and fragmented due to varying State privacy laws.  HIPAA would solve this by unlocking medical data that had previously been out of their grasp.  But the reason it had previously been more difficult to share medical data was that this information was highly sensitive and personal, and being able to keep it private has long been a cultural expectation.  On top of that, it's not meant to be easy for the government to obtain your private information.  Checks and balances are essential to protect against abuse of centralized power given that HIPAA has largely undermined patient-doctor confidentiality by broadening permissions for data sharing with third parties.  It was meant with concern and a recognition that it had to be counterbalanced with some privacy protections so HIPAA included a provision that said, "Congress had three years to pass comprehensive privacy legislation and if Congress wasn't able to come to an agreement about the language of this privacy legislation in this time there was a backup plan."  Twila Brace again, "The US Department of Health and Human Services was required to write a rule if Congress did not pass a Privacy Law."  Basically, if Congress couldn't come to a bipartisan consensus on this privacy law within 3 years, then HHS was given the authority to create its own privacy standards.  Let me repeat that part.  The HHS, the Federal agency that wanted to collect people's medical data was put in charge of writing a law that would also protect people's Medical Data from collection. Isn't that a bit like asking the fox to write the rules for protecting the hen house?  We get a sense of HHS's priorities by looking at their recommendations to Congress during this 3-year period.  the priority was not privacy.  Twila Brace, "They actually talked about the age-old rights of privacy, but then they said that we needed to move away from that to use data for publicly useful purposes.  In other words, individuals must sacrifice their privacy for what they call the "common good." Instead of letting patients decide whether their data is shared, HHS recommended doing away with patient consent and replacing it with laws that would allow certain entities to share their information automatically without needing patient approval now the deadline for passing privacy legislation eventually expired, and predictably Congress was unable to agree to a Privacy Law in that time.  Twila Brace, "So after 3 years, the US Department of Health and Human Services wrote the rule."  The regulation created by HHS, known as the HIPAA Privacy Rule, went into effect in 2003 and it did include some restrictions on who could access medical data under these new permissive laws.  "Your doctor giving your boss your health records without your permission that's a HIPAA violation."  

Rob Frommer, "What it protects from is like your medical information being given to like your employer with the idea that I might go see a shrink.  I don't want my employer to know about it."  

Indeed, the most restrictive part of HIPAA is actually the part that consumers themselves come into contact with, which might explain why people think HIPAA improved their medical privacy.  I'm sure many of us have had experiences where we've tried to get access to the medical records of a family member only to be told that the hospital can't hand over because it would violate HIPAA.  But the reality is that although this rule seems to restrict sharing as a consumer level when you pull back curtain of this privacy theater it's a very different story.  Twila Brace, "So HHS when they wrote their rule, they just decimated privacy rights.  They gave the data away to all of these other entities."  

7:50.  So who exactly is allowed to get your information first those who are directly involved with your treatment are naturally going to have access to your data.  Twila Brace, "The clinic, the hospital, the laboratory, the Radiology facility, the nursing home, . . ."  And then the Privacy Rule goes on to explain under which circumstances these entities are allowed to share your protected health information and with whom.  Some of these are what you'd expect: the treatment, the payment, etc.  But one of the permitted uses is for something called, "Healthcare Operations."  Twila Brace,  "The definition of healthcare operations for which your data can be shared is almost 400 words long . . . ."  Let's read it.  "Healthcare operations means any of the following activities of the . . . ," and she scrolls rapidly.  Twila Brace, "It's essentially a list of about 65 non-clinical business activities, so nothing having to do with your medical treatment whatsoever.  If your hospital, if your clinic, if your lab chooses to share your identifiable medical information, they can."  To be clear, these 65 non-clinical business activities permit PHI, or Protected Health Information, to be shared, meaning medical information is still attached to identifiers, like your name and social security number, and most importantly . . . , Twila Brace, "They're allowed to share the data without patient consent."  And you [didn't] even know they were doing it.  

9:22. "One of the most criticized aspects of the Federal Health Privacy Rule," as one Yale Journal [page 344] notes, "is its lax restrictions on the use and disclosure of health information for marketing activities." 

HIPAA allows a provider to use a patient's health information for marketing activities without obtaining the patient's informed consent. In 2010, there was a modification to the HIPAA privacy security and enforcement rules under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, 2009.


Patient Files Opened to Marketers, Fundraisers; Critics Decry Exemptions Won Through Lobbying, Washington Post, January 16th, 2001.

Federal Register The Daily Journal of the United States Government which came after the HITECH Act was passed these rules expanded the scope of HIPAA and broadened the definition of business associates to include all kinds of contractors and subcontractors the healthcare providers and insurers and that's from The Institute for Health Freedom proposed changes to Privacy Rule won't insure privacy September 2010

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

US Veteran Confronts Arizona Assembly Shutting Down Free Speech

Posted by at No comments:

WANT BABIES? EAT A KETOGENIC DIET

Posted by at No comments:

How to make your own Beef Tallow - remove those Seed Oils for better health pic

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

What chemicals are in Starbucks drinks such as pumpkin spice ammonia latte?

Starbucks didn't publish the ingredients for their coffee drinks it was a mystery until I convinced a barista to show me the ingredients from the back of the bottles they were using to make their famous "Spice Lattes."  I found out that here in the United States, Starbucks was coloring their PSL with caramel coloring level 4, an ingredient made from ammonia and linked to cancer by using beta-carotene from carrots to color their drinks.  In the UK after publishing an investigation and widespread media attention, Starbucks removed caramel coloring from all of their drinks in America . . . 

Question: caramel coloring level 4 is ubiquitous in all cola and soda beverages.  Why doesn't she indict Pepsi-Co, Coca-Cola, and others?  Oh, I get it.  

As to the FDA not recognizing any harms from ammonia-sourced caramel food coloring, it's safe to assume that the FDA approves of cancer and is therefore criminally indifferent.  To be honest, the FDA has no legal contract with consumers to regulate what companies actually put in their food.  I will never forget the time that I contacted Muay, a sausage company from Texas to ask if they put MSG in their sausage, which I loved at the time.  Here was their response.  Yes, I got an actual reply: 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Why Does King Soopers Not Want to Display the Ingredients of Food Products They Sell to Buyers?



 

Posted by at No comments:

ERIC YEUNG: Trump will cut Zelenskyy off (no more unlimited USD funding Ukraine) once he wins. @TFL1728

Thank you to Tom Luongo.

Trump has agreed to meet with Zelensky just to humiliate him for being a sniveling goblin: Trump: "I also have a great relationship with Putin..." Zelensky: "I hope you have more good relations with us…"  

Trump: "Well, you know, it takes two to Tango you know…" 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,


Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

OWEN BENJAMIN: a man's use is their moral strength and their ability to provide and protect and to tell the truth. That's your use. You're not beautiful. You're not to be cherished and adorned in silks.

00:36  I might reformat my view on "No victims."  I think women and children can be victims.  Women are super malleable.  There's this book out about neuroplasticity, about regenerating your brain and all that.  Women might not know right from wrong if they don't have a good male role model, and I know that might infuriate some women.  And I'm actually starting to have more compassion for lesbians, not saying it's a good move.  Not saying it should be a public display thing in front of children, but man, have men messed up some ladies!  Dude!  Researching this has sparked some stuff in my childhood.  There was a guy who did something to himself because he was facing charges . . . .  Bad dads, bad husbands, abusive men, . . . these people were branding women, selling them, getting blackmail on them, leverage, humiliation rituals, dude, it's bad.  There's something about women and children where they don't really always know.  Men always know.  Men can go through boot camp, Marines, ooh-aah, go do some crazy stuff.  We can be kind of brainwashed, but we always kind of know.  There's just something about men where we do have the ability of figuring it out.  I don't know because I've never been a woman, allegedly.  [hysterical]  But they might not know.  I see some of these women, like that "Ride or Die" thing that women have for a powerful man can really hijack, and I'm not saying that they shouldn't face prosecution for crimes but it really is the man's responsibility.  When I say there are no victims, only volunteers, I'm talking to men.  Women can be messed up by men because we do have authority over women.  That's not a chauvinism or control thing.  It's a responsibility.  And it's so true.  When I look at women who have it really well having awesome lives, and I know that they could have gone down a horrible road if they had that dedication and connection to a really bad guy.  And if you look at a lot of women in certain lifestyles, you'll see like horrific dads.  I don't mean that the dads didn't play catch with them, worked too much, or had an affair when they were a teen, I'm talking about legit psychological and physical, and sexual abuse.  It's way more common than people think.  

4:00  It really is up to the guys, so I am amending my statement.  Here's the thing I don't know: I don't know when a boy becomes a man.  I don't know.  Other cultures and tribes and groups have a thing they do, a rite of passage [a ritual?].  In 300, it was when that little dude fought the wolf.  America doesn't really have that.  We turn 18, and then we get really, really drunk.  I don't know what age, but there has to be an age where you're responsible now.  And it's not just an age, because I think it's different for everybody, but there's a time when you know right from wrong.  And so if you do something, you are not a victim.  Women, ladies, please comment on this and let me know.  Do you think you guys are as . . . I mean don't get me wrong.  An adult woman should be held accountable for her actions.  I'm not a cuck.  I'm not a white knight, but bad male leadership with a woman is crazy harmful.  Maybe they have like half the ability to discern.  Because, dude, that's why advertisers always aim at women, and they always want to feminize men, because they want to get you in that chaotic, pathological state where you'll accept any bullshit.  Men in their male state, and you can always return to that male state, don't get tricked very easily.  That's why rural American tradesmen are the most despised people by corporate America because they don't fall for stuff.  They're very simple.  They don't need to buy $300 jeans.  They just work and they see utility.  Because . . . I see women that get it completely, wise, incredible moral compass, but you always see strong men in their life--grandfathers, fathers, husbands, you always see a strong male in their life.  When you have horrible men, you'll see them getting branded, and used, and they'll carry out monstrous acts.  And then, of course, they hate men, and they become lesbians.  And it's still the men's fault.  "Oh, you're blaming men."  Dude, I'm taking authority and accountability, and I think men should or else you're effed.  Like a man's use is their moral strength and their ability to provide and protect and to tell the truth.  That's your use.  You're not beautiful.  You're not to be cherished and adorned in silks.  That's why every time I see one of these guys that are just so into their jewelry and being adorned, I don't see a guy.  Don't get me wrong.  You can have a million-dollar car and still be a good guy but it has to be because you value the engineering or that it provides something for you that another car doesn't, not just because it's like beauty, and you're a special boy.  Like that money could be spent on land or gunpowder or gold.  That's why I call it gay; yeah, gay.  
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)