Showing posts with label CMS reporting on vaccines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CMS reporting on vaccines. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 26, 2021

REPORTING FROM CMS: Number one cause for underreporting was that the medical professionals didn't know anything about the [reporting] system.

So you're going to have babies; they're going to come out looking normal, and when they turn 18, 19, 20-years-old, they're not going to have any eggs to actually get pregnant with because these chemicals in these shots are known to be toxic to the developing eggs inside the ovaries of the developing females, . . .

The title of this video is Depopulation by Any Means: Dr. Bryan Ardis, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg.

At the 23:17 mark, Dr. Aris refers everybody to Thomas Renz's siteAmerica's Front Line Doctors.  MyFreeDoctor.com.  

32:00  Lawsuit filed on July 19 against the federal government was an injunction to stop the EUA of the vaccines.  Because one of the reporting services for CMS, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, there was a whistleblower who came forward and her statistical review of the data--just in CMS--shows from just 3 days after the shot is 45,000 deaths in that database alone.  And they have not extended the search out yet to 4 days post-vaccine, 5 days post-vaccine but they're going to do it.  That's what this actual lawsuit is about.  

The important thing is that in the FDA document published on October 22, 2020, they actually stated that they were going to be doing a rapid assessment of reporting coming in from injuries from the vaccines.  And they were going to be using this and they stated in that FDA document, "We're going to be trusting the CMS data to give us the best information that we can relay to the American public on these vaccines being safe and effective."  Do you know what system that was?   The CMS system and no one ever talked about that 45,000 deaths that were reported in the first 3 days of the shot reported into Medicare, which is typically the older generation in America, and Medicaid which are the impoverished individuals in America in just that 1 out of 11 reporting systems.  VAERS reported over 12,000 which is the reporting system into the Health and Human Services.  This whistleblower said that all of the numbers being reported are off by a factor of five.  She's a mathematician, 25 years of doing algorithm and health databases.  She said that the total count is off by a factor of FIVE.

34:00  Dr. Zelenko, Dr. Mercola, they're all convinced that the counting is off by TEN or even a HUNDRED times.  About these reporting systems, the University of Harvard in 2010 did a review of all reporting systems on vaccine injuries into the United States' agencies.  After a 3-year review, they found that it is less than 1%.  I hear that doctors and other people in the media that the counting is upwards of only 10% or less.  No, it's not.  The actual number in the document from Harvard Pilgrim--it's less than 1% of all reported.  So it doesn't matter what number you hear reported on deaths, it doesn't matter how many miscarriages or demyelinating diseases, or auto-immune diseases or Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), or how many hundreds now of Bell's Palsy that's been reported, you can add 2 ZEROS for every one of those figures to get close to what Harvard said is the actual data. 

35:35  VIVIANE FISCHER  Because some people [meaning medical care workers, people who do the reporting] think that they are with the vaccination program performing a vital and valuable service on behalf of society, that they might not report the adverse effects of the vaccines for fear of its disasters could bring the vaccine campaign to a halt.  We had problems too at a convalescent home in Berlin, where out of 13 people who were vaccinated 8 died.  That was never reported.  I mean who died shortly after vaccination.

ARDIS  In that document from Harvard, it actually states that the #1 cause for underreporting was that the medical professionals didn't know anything about the [reporting] system.  #2 was that if they wrote it down in their records, the doctor would have to go down to the VAERS data system and actually report it a second time and it got in the way of the workflow experience in the office for the doctors.  When Harvard approached the CDC at the end of the 3 years, they asked them to allow Harvard to help them develop a better system of reporting.  The CDC took the consultant away from the Harvard Review study and told them, "No more that we're going to assist Harvard and all in that initiative."  So there's been no change since then.  And I will say that you guys have had some frontline American doctors on there, Dr. Lee Merritt, who said that it was very obvious that a patient who had just received a vaccine, a teenager, immediately went into Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).  And she looked at the doctor who was trying to get the teenager up onto the gurney and this doctor is the one who is treating this patient, she said, "When did she receive her vaccine?"  

DOCTOR:  It was just an hour earlier.  

38:00  And she said, "This is Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).  This is the first listed side-effect on the FDA's guide in October.  And she looked at the doctor, who is a colleague of hers, and asked, "Are you going to report this to VAERS?"

And his response was, "What's VAERS?"

So, yes, there is a huge amount of underreporting, for sure.  I would suspect, for sure, based on this whistleblower coming out, that Thomas Renz has filed this lawsuit on behalf of America's Frontline Doctors, that when it's a factor of FIVE, you have to estimate that it's at least a [factor of] TEN.  For sure, the actual numbers are 45,000 just within 3 days of getting the shots.  

WOLFGANG WODARG:  I just spoke about the incentives for the doctors to tell something or not to tell it.  And that depends on what to charge for it and it depends on whether they feel they have made a mistake, then they would not like to say it.  If they gave a vaccination, they would not like so much to tell it to anybody if something happens.  So there are such problems, which distort all statistics, and we have to keep this in mind.  And I mam very sure that we have much more side effects with this so-called vaccination than we have in the numbers and the statistics in all administrations 

39:30  In Germany, it wouldn't be just the doctor who does the vaccination who would need to report this but if a doctor has a patient, just what we heard earlier from Ardis, so if someone comes to the doctor and says, "I just had a vaccination, and I have a rash or headache or something, the doctor at a vaccination clinic would also have to report in fact.  

40:35  On the FDA slide #16, in October 22, 2020, there is a side effect listed on there.  It is called Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in Children, MIS-C, a brand new disease that's only been created and given a diagnostic code since 2020.  We all know that COVID, or SARS-CoV-2, was a very little threat to children and to pregnant women.  We already knew that.  but there were very rare occurrences where the spike protein of the Coronavirus could create this Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in Children. It's a known side effect of the vaccine.  The FDA knew it.  by definition, if you look up the Mayo Clinic's definition of what Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in Children, it is a severe inflammation of multiple organs in the body, including the brain, the kidneys, the spleen, the gastrointestinal tract, the eyes, the skin.  This is all part of that.  If you look up complications on their definition of this actual syndrome, it can be deadly.  Now, in VAERS, I have not seen a single one of these reported into VAERS, but if you go to CDC.gov.com, there are already reports recorded since the shots have started.  There have already been 4,200 cases reported to the CDC of occurrences of Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in Children, and already over 40 deaths of children, reported to the CDC.  [Ardis does not touch on the fact that since June 2020, scores of cases of Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in adults, MIS-A, in adults have also been reported.  Oh, God.]  And this is what you want to push on all the masses of children in America and across the world to allow them to go to school?  I find this atrocious and disgusting.  And everyone needs to know that this is a known side-effect because the mRNA, and the spike protein in the shots or anything else that might be in those shots, are going to cause this debilitating, horrible reaction of inflammation in multiple organs at one time in the body of children.  There have been trials by, like Stanford.  Stanford has been setting up a study to allow vaccination of 6-month-olds, 2-year-olds, so you're seeing some of these being given to children, pushed out to children.  So these have actually already started to be corresponded (meaning that they're being recorded and evaluated?).

TRANSMISSION

44:00  Also, you're going to see what Wolfgang can talk about: transmission, shedding from the vaccinated parents to their children.  Oh, God.  You're seeing reports that all MIS-C started spiking.  You can actually look on CDCgov, the spike for MIS-C starts in December 2020, spikes in January, and continues to go up.  The chart below is a 7-day moving average.   

Children, toddlers, babies being vaccinated?  Oh, yeah, there are reports of 2-year-olds having menstruating blood clots after an hour of their parents being vaccinated?  This is already being reported in 2-year-old, 4-year-old, 6-year-old daughters.  In girls, this is the attempt in those female bodies to remove the toxic effects they're being exposed to by their vaccinated parents, or whom ever they're around.  

45:15  I call it transmission, you call it shedding, but when you put in 50 billion particles of mRNA, you're going to get 50 billion spike proteins.  You're going to get more than that in antibodies.  And the human body is going to start to shed these things.  You're going to transmit it through coughing, through sweating, through urine, through semen.  You have to excrete it out of your body, this is not healthy; it's an overabundance of immune reactions.  So the body is going to try to shed the spike proteins, it's going to try to shed the antibodies.  We already know how detrimental these antibodies are.  The antibodies themselves have already been proven with the Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca shot, those actual antibodies against double-stranded DNA, which is what is in those shots--the transgenes--we already know they cause Systemic lupus erythematosus, which I referenced earlier.  You're going to see auto-immune diseases come from the shots.  You're going to see the shedding of antibodies and spike proteins in other people.  It's just a horrible thing.  They knew this was going to happen.  It's in the FDA documents, and the FDA logo is on every slide.  These side-effects are permanent and lifelong?  

48:00  When we came out in October of 2020 with the FDA document myocarditis was listed as one of the known side effects.  Now, what are you hearing reported by all the teenagers that are now being given the shots?  You're hearing hundreds of thousands of reports of myocardidits.  And some of these athletes and teenagers are dying in high schools, high school ages.  But the FDA already knew this.  What's incredible to me is that the FDA said this week, "Because of the concerns about myocarditis in children before they start putting this into all children in America, we want Pfizer literally to expand how many children they put in the trial.  Why would you want to give any more children a shot that is causing myocarditis, whether it's in a trial of any kind or to the masses?  Why would you encourage any more children, or risk their life for health, over an experimental shot?  

49:40  Also, all pregnant women need to beware--there is polyethylene glycol 2000 in the Pfizer and Moderna shots; there's polysorbate 80 in the Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca shots; there's graphene oxide that's been determined to be inside of the Pfizer shot.  If you're pregnant with a female baby, there are two trimesters in which the female body's ovaries, inside your baby, will be creating all the eggs it will ever have for its whole life.  Infertility that's going to be coming from this is not in this generation--your babies are going to be born unable to have children of their own.  So you're going to have babies; they're going to come out looking normal, and when they turn 18, 19, 20-years-old, they're not going to have any eggs to actually get pregnant with because these chemicals in these shots are known to be toxic to the developing eggs inside the ovaries of the developing females.  So you're going to look back and say, "You know what--that shot didn't cause any harm to my child.  I got the vaccines when I was pregnant with you.  At 10-years-old, you're fine; at 20-years-old, you're fine; and then you go to get pregnant and try to have children, you never will be able to.  This is a great attempt to try to sterilize and infertilize the world, it appears.  Every pregnant woman should be warned that they should never take these shots.  Outside of the miscarriages that are being reported within days of the shots, think about the baby inside.   

51:38  Two things should be disturbing to people, I think, especially in America.  We've been raised to trust this one agency to do its due diligence, to approve things to be safe and effective medically.  That's called the FDA.  They do this FDA approval process.  Why in the world has any American been okay with the fact that they mandated, the NIH didn't, Anthony Fauci didn't, a never FDA-approved to be the only treatment for COVID?  It has been FDA-approved in October only after they already killed 500,000 Americans.  But it was never FDA approved when the pandemic started because the Ebola study proved that it was not safe and effective, and the FDA was not going to approve it.  Why then the next step--a vaccine that's never been tried on humans before.  And it's never been FDA-approved.  Why in the world did we drop all common sense and respect for what we thought was an agency that was doing some kind of review on medical devices and drugs to determine if they were safe and effective?  Why didn't we just throw that out the window and just trust you to just throw anything you want at us?  They've used every cultic tactic that they could think of through the media.  53:00