"Concerns about the safety and efficacy of [Moderna's] products . . . evaporated in the wave of panic surrounding COVID-19 . . ."

A fascinating and disturbing article about Moderna and its shady past.  https://t.co/IEFH8imun3

— Stephanie Seneff (@stephanieseneff) October 9, 2021

A few highlights from the damning article on Moderna. 

As STAT noted in 2016, the people who were tasked with making “the science work” were those who most frequently resigned, which led to Moderna losing two heads of chemistry within a single year, followed shortly by losing its chief scientific officer and its head of manufacturing. Many top executives, including the heads of its cancer research and rare disease research branches, ended up lasting fewer than eighteen months in their respective positions. The abrupt resignations weren’t exclusive to Moderna’s science-focused executive positions either, as the chief information officer and top financial executive roles were also affected. Bancel ultimately sought advice from the human resources departments of Facebook, Google, and Netflix on employee retention. 

It looks like all of these biotech companies are overvalued, and so find some way to connect themselves with military intelligence for a Hail Mary rescue.  And clearly, the last thing on the minds of these corporate assholes is the well-being of those receiving their toxic products.  

Arguably, the most critical difference between Moderna and Theranos is that Moderna, whose numerous issues and challenges only came to light after the collapse of Theranos had begun, has never faced the same degree of scrutiny from the US government or mainstream investigative journalists. There are many possible reasons for this, including Moderna’s close relationship with the US Department of Defense through the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), or concern that its exposure post-Theranos would bring scrutiny to any company existing at the intersection of Silicon Valley and the health-care industry. However, such a reckoning would likely have been inevitable for Moderna had it not been for the COVID-19 crisis, which could not have come at a more convenient time for the company.  

Anytime you see a company joining forces with the military, think of democide.  Given how Americans are in love with their military and fawn over the image of one of their soldiers, dead or alive, it's hard for Americans to perceive contradictions, a conflict of interest, or something more sinister.  It's apple pie, hotdogs, and Chevrolet.   

MODERNA'S "SOFTWARE" ENCOUNTERS BUGS

Many of the problems with Moderna that Garde identified in 2016 continued to plague the company right up until the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis. Chief among these was Moderna’s struggle to prove that its technology worked and that it was safe. Concerns about the safety and efficacy of the company’s products, which were publicly reported beginning in 2017, evaporated in the wave of panic surrounding COVID-19 and the simultaneous “Warp Speed” race for a vaccine that would “end the pandemic.” Yet, there is little, if any, evidence that these once-well-recognized concerns were addressed prior to the US government’s emergency use authorization of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine and its now widespread use in many countries around the world. To the contrary, there is evidence that these concerns were covered up both prior to and during the development of its vaccine. 

I just don't see how this can be good for the American consumer. 

A few weeks later, Moderna’s Bancel  attended the World Economic Forum’s 2019 annual meeting alongside Johnson & Johnson executive Paul Stoffels and other pharmaceutical and biotech leaders in order to “rub elbows with world leaders and one-percenters—and talk about the future of healthcare.” Other healthcare figures in attendance included the head of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, and “global health philanthropist” Bill Gates, whose foundation entered into “a global health project framework” with Moderna in 2016 to “advance mRNA-based development projects for various infectious diseases.” The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the only foundation listed as a “strategic collaborator” on the Moderna website. Other “strategic collaborators” include the US government’s Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), the US military’s DARPA, and pharmaceutical giants AstraZeneca and Merck.

It should be noted that John Hopkins University is integrally involved in the great vaccine rollout, running cover for and with DARPA.  Unlimited Hangout explains it thus:

The simulation was a collaborative effort led by the John Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies (part of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security) in collaboration with the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the Analytic Services (ANSER) Institute for Homeland Security and the Oklahoma National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism. The concept, design and script of the simulation were created by Tara O’Toole and Thomas Inglesby of the Johns Hopkins Center along with Randy Larsen and Mark DeMier of ANSER. The full script of the exercise can be read here. 

What this tells me is that John Hopkins has been involved in military biowarfare since at least 9/11.  The planes crashing into the Twin Towers is the least of our worries, if you have all these american institutions coordinating an effort to poison millions of Americans.  And to what end?  Some have argued that just as the Nazis backpacked through Europe stealing the wealth of its citizens there, that the military intelligence assets are trying to steal the assets of Americans.