LATRICE LITTLETON: what we have here is a former president using his star power to laugh off a serious question thus making the audience around him stop asking questions because they will feel ridiculous if they actually take it seriously.

History is full of warnings that people laughed off until it was too late.  When you think about bad actors who wish us harm as a nation, they don't need you to agree with them; they just need to convince you that any criticism of their movement while they advance on you should just be laughed off and not taken seriously.  Latrice Littleton 

Truth👇👇👇👇👇👇

— John Guandolo (@JGuandolo54271) October 27, 2026

Barack Obama,

Par for the course is running all kinds of scary ads to make you think Democrats are radicals or communist or jihadist or the woke police that will come arrest you and force feed you tofu instead of hamburgers.

Ladies and gentlemen, that is the point of the joke.  If people are laughing, it means that they're not thinking.  Instead, Obama is passing this off as something that we should just laugh at, something that we shouldn't even take seriously.  

So what's the tactic that he's using here?  Number one you want to exaggerate a legitimate concern to the point where it seems absurd.  And then you mock the exaggeration instead of answering the very real question that you should be answering.  The DSA has already told us that they're communists.  So by default, people who are a part of the DSA, you should just look at their Manifesto and their page and you can see exactly what they want to do, so that's not absurd.  They're plainly saying that their communists.

As it relates to Abdul El-Sayed and the comments about his affiliations [ with the Muslim Brotherhood], they never sit down and say, "Hey, there are some legitimate concerns.  Can you walk us through this?"  No they just say, "This is ridiculous."  It's the same thing that Abdul El-Sayed does when he's asked about his affiliations [with Muslim Brotherhood].  He just says, "Is that a real question?" like you are utterly obnoxious and ridiculous for even asking him this.  Basically, what we have here is a former president using his star power to laugh off a serious question thus making the audience around him stop asking questions because they will feel ridiculous if they actually take it seriously.  And this is exactly why this is so dangerous and why I've said time and time again that voting for Barack Obama was a mistake, that he is not who he purports to be.  Why else would you laugh off questions of communists invading the Democratic Party?  Why else would you scoff or laugh at accusations about things that could quite literally disrupt or destroy our national security and our safety that we have here in the United States?  You're trying to encourage people to stop paying attention and turn valid concerns into a punchline.  History is full of warnings that people laughed off until it was too late.  When you think about bad actors who wish us harm as a nation, they don't need you to agree with them; they just need to convince you that any criticism of their movement while they advance on you should just be laughed off and not taken seriously.  And that's how they win.  

SETH GRUBER: they won't define marriage, therefore they won't protect it. They won't define a woman, therefore they won't protect them. They won't define the unborn, therefore they won't protect them.

He’s not wrong! We are sadly allowing this to happen! https://t.co/GqFHS8br7i

— Silverbell4you (@Silverbell4you2) October 25, 2026

Seth Gruber.

Why does it feel like America is falling apart?

Why can't we define what a woman is?  Because for 52 years we've been pretending that we don't know what a baby is.  They won't def--they won't define marriage, therefore they won't protect it.

They won't define a woman, therefore they won't protect them. 

They won't define the unborn, therefore they won't protect them.

Pay attention.  

John Locke says he who defines the words defines the world Language shapes the way we think and it colors the way we see the world if we're not willing to use the correct words and make the right arguments on this most fundamental of all issues we will continue to surrender every other freedom that we have taken for granted in this Republic.

So when we stand for the unborn we're not just obeying God's Commandment that we find in Leviticus 20 to speak up.  He says if you sacrifice children to Moloch or you let them and you pretend not to see, I'll cut you off from the people. I'll cut you off from your tribe.  I'll cut you off from Israel.  For what?  For killing babies?  No, no, no, no, no.  It says, it says "for looking at those who sacrificed their children to Moloch and not doing anything." So this issue is not important just because God says it is; it's important because if we can't get it right and we can't answer those questions, you can kiss America and your freedoms goodbye because we're dealing with the question, "What does it mean to be human?  What does it mean to be a person?  And do we all share those rights equally?"

LINUXHIPPIE: an Operative that was trained by the Islamic Movement. There are tens of thousands of them in the U.S. These incidents will increase exponentially in the coming years.

You're watching an Operative that was trained by the Islamic Movement. There are tens of thousands of them in the U.S. These incidents will increase exponentially in the coming years.

— Linuxhippie (@linuxhippie) October 26, 2026

The jihadi mentions the Jinn and the shayatin.  These are very dark, demonic people who have a penchant for violence.  Though the representatives within your own country will tell you they're from a peaceful religion.

KEVIN MCKERNAN: Psilocybin has a much larger therapeutic index than IVM.

I suspect your trolling the means.. But in case you’re not, psilocybin has a much larger therapeutic index than IVM. The therapeutic index (TI) is a ratio that compares the toxic dose (usually TD50 or LD50) to the effective dose (ED50) of a drug. A higher TI means a wider margin of safety. Here’s a side-by-side comparison: Psilocybin •ED50 (effective dose): ~6–10 mg orally in humans •LD50 (lethal dose): ~280 mg/kg in rats (oral) •Estimated human LD50 extrapolated: >17,000 mg for a 70 kg adult (very high) •Therapeutic Index: >1000 •Notes: •Extremely low toxicity; no known fatal overdose from pure psilocybin. •Primary risks are psychological (e.g., panic, psychosis) rather than physiological. Ivermectin •ED50 (effective antiparasitic dose): ~150–400 µg/kg (human standard dose) •LD50 (lethal dose): ~10–30 mg/kg in mammals •Therapeutic Index: ~50–100 depending on species and route •Notes: •High safety margin in antiparasitic use. •Neurotoxicity becomes a concern at very high doses or in certain dog breeds lacking MDR1 gene; rare in humans at therapeutic levels. Summary •Psilocybin has a much higher therapeutic index (>1000), reflecting its extremely low physical toxicity. •Ivermectin has a high but lower TI (~50–100), still considered safe within prescribed doses.

— Kevin McKernan (@Kevin_McKernan) May 10, 2025

I suspect your trolling the means. But in case you’re not, psilocybin has a much larger therapeutic index than IVM. The therapeutic index (TI) is a ratio that compares the toxic dose (usually TD50 or LD50) to the effective dose (ED50) of a drug. A higher TI means a wider margin of safety. Here’s a side-by-side comparison: PSILOCYBIN •ED50 (effective dose): ~6–10 mg orally in humans •LD50 (lethal dose): ~280 mg/kg in rats (oral) •Estimated human LD50 extrapolated: >17,000 mg for a 70 kg adult (very high) •Therapeutic Index: >1000 •Notes: •Extremely low toxicity; no known fatal overdose from pure psilocybin. •Primary risks are psychological (e.g., panic, psychosis) rather than physiological. IVERMECTIN •ED50 (effective antiparasitic dose): ~150–400 µg/kg (human standard dose) •LD50 (lethal dose): ~10–30 mg/kg in mammals •Therapeutic Index: ~50–100 depending on species and route •Notes: •High safety margin in antiparasitic use. •Neurotoxicity becomes a concern at very high doses or in certain dog breeds lacking MDR1 gene; rare in humans at therapeutic levels. SUMMARY •Psilocybin has a much higher therapeutic index (>1000), reflecting its extremely low physical toxicity. 

•Ivermectin has a high but lower TI (~50–100), still considered safe within prescribed doses. 

Duck Eggs vs. Chicken Eggs

https://t.co/aO9LVd96BK

— SGAnon (@TheQNewsPatriot) October 25, 2026

Duck eggs have a harder shell so they last a lot longer on your counter than chicken eggs.

Ducks lay all through the winter, and they can give you 250 to 350 + eggs in a year, which is more than a chicken.

Making a coop for [ducks] is so much easier than the ones you have to make for chickens.  You don't need all these roosting boxes or purchase.  They just lay their eggs on the ground in here.  So it's a lot simpler.

Ducks are more disease resistant than chickens, and especially if you feed them red pepper flakes that keeps the parasites down and egg production up. 

Way more protein in one duck egg than you would in a chicken egg, and the yolk is so rich.  As long as you keep clean water and a good feed for them, then their eggs taste exactly like chicken.

Ducks also eat bugs and slugs off of your garden.

Ducks are like less dramatic.  They don't fight like chickens do.

Ducks lay eggs for 5+ plus years; that's longer than chickens who slow down at 2 to 3 years.