CHRISTOPHER WALKEN: Because every once in a while, the lion has to show the jackals who he is. It's too late to be scared. It's time to kill.

Were we not told exactly what would happen?

The jackals and the hyenas are circling. Rs and Ds alike have blocked every single attorney appointment.

It's coming. Mark my words. It's coming.  https://t.co/KfCPHrD3Nz

— Fred Bastiat (@fbastiat17) February 2, 2026

You ever watch those nature documentaries on the cable? 
Yeah. 
You see that one about lions? Look at this lion. He's the king of the jungle, huge mane out there. He's laying down under a tree in the middle of Africa. He's so big, he's so hot . . . he doesn't want to move.
Now the little lions come, they start messing with him, biting his tail, biting his ears. He isn't doing anything. The lioness, she starts pestering 'em, coming over and making trouble. Still nothing.
Now the jackals and hyenas, they start to move in. They're barking at him, laughing at him. They nip his toes and eat the food that's in his domain. They do this and get closer and closer and bolder . . . until one day, that lion gets up and tears the shit out of everybody. Runs like the wind, eats everything in his path.
Because every once in a while, the lion has to show the jackals who he is.  It's too late to be scared. It's time to kill.

I'm going to the other room. You come out when you're ready. Don't beat him . . . kick his ass. 

STEPHEN MILLER: There are no “asylum seekers” on the Southern Border. “Asylum” is limited to individuals fleeing extremely narrow categories of state persecution (eg high-ranking Soviet defectors during the Cold War) — none of the groups illegally crossing the border fit that criteria.

Thank you to Tom Luongo. 

A little primer on “asylum”:

1. There are no “asylum seekers” on the Southern Border. “Asylum” is limited to individuals fleeing extremely narrow categories of state persecution (eg high-ranking Soviet defectors during the Cold War) — none of the groups illegally crossing the…

— Stephen Miller (@StephenM) February 2, 2026

A little primer on “asylum”: 1. There are no “asylum seekers” on the Southern Border. “Asylum” is limited to individuals fleeing extremely narrow categories of state persecution (eg high-ranking Soviet defectors during the Cold War) — none of the groups illegally crossing the border fit that criteria. No one in Mexico or Ecuador or Honduras etc live in nations where there is any state persecution of any protected class. It’s all fake, all the way down.

2. All non-Mexican illegals have transited through additional countries on the way to America where there are no forms of state persecution, thereby further disproving any hypothetical claim.

3. As yet further proof the claims are fake, aliens turn down the opportunity to avoid this fabricated persecution by being safely resettled in another nation.

4. Illegal aliens receive free and functionally unlimited legal services. When facing deportation, they and their lawyers (as a matter of course) automatically file fake asylum applications. It’s a multibillion dollar fraudulent industry. It’s gross, unethical, and deeply immoral. Everyone involved in this system understands and knows these claims are false. Adjudicating these knowingly false claims is a full-time job for thousands of people.

5. Federal law requires illegal aliens to be detained pending a hearing for their (fake) asylum claim. These are not prisons. They are not being punished. No one is being sentenced. Civil detention and removal is not part of the Article III justice system (in fact, Congress stripped Article III of jurisdiction over civil immigration procedure). The goal of the US government is to send aliens home immediately (they get cash and a free plane ticket) with the fewest days in custody as logistically possible. Any delay is caused by the fake asylum claim.

6. When the fake asylum claim is heard on the “non-detained” docket, the illegal aliens rarely show for their hearings. Those few who do show stay in the country regardless after losing (unless placed into detention). Removal orders are ignored as a matter of course. If and when absconders are eventually found (at great time and expense) they still have to be detained to actually effectuate the removal. At this point in time their lawyers will file a motion to reopen their asylum claim or otherwise appeal the finding and seek release again. Regardless, no removal of any alien anywhere can occur unless in a detained setting. If the alien has children they are, by law, supposed to stay in a family residential center (that costs more per night than a high-end hotel, and includes full medical, dental, scholastic and other services). 

7. Biden officials did not even bother with the pretext of performing intake interviews for the millions and millions and millions they released into the US. The aliens were simply released on sight, no questions asked, with court dates years away, in the hope and expectation that by the time their fake asylum claims were adjudicated and rejected years later, Democrats would be able to scream that these illegals have now lived here for X years and they and their children must be allowed to stay at our permanent expense. No one in the prior Administration responsible for these decisions actually believed the or now this has anything to do with asylum. To them, it is just useful propaganda in service of infinite mass migration. 

MASSIMO: Just 28 days without parabens and phthalates turned off breast cancer genes.

Just 28 days without parabens and phthalates turned off breast cancer genes.

Researchers followed a group of healthy women who routinely used common personal-care products containing parabens and phthalates—chemicals found in everything from shampoo and lotion to makeup and… pic.twitter.com/w8K1nj494g

— Massimo (@Rainmaker1973) February 2, 2026

Just 28 days without parabens and phthalates turned off breast cancer genes. Researchers followed a group of healthy women who routinely used common personal-care products containing parabens and phthalates—chemicals found in everything from shampoo and lotion to makeup and fragrance. These compounds can act like estrogen in the body, and excess estrogen-like activity has long been tied to higher breast-cancer risk. For 28 days, 36 women did one simple thing: they switched to paraben- and phthalate-free alternatives. No drugs, no diet changes—just cleaner cosmetics and toiletries. The results were striking: urine tests confirmed that levels of the chemicals’ breakdown products plummeted, proving exposure had been sharply reduced. But the bigger revelation came from breast-tissue biopsies taken before and after the switch. In just four weeks, the women’s breast cells began behaving less like precancerous or cancerous cells. They regained the ability to respond to normal “cell-death” signals (a safeguard tumors often disable). Protective estrogen receptors, which are typically shut down in breast cancer, switched back on. Gene-expression patterns shifted away from high-risk profiles and toward healthier patterns. This is the first human evidence that routine exposure to these everyday chemicals can nudge normal breast cells in a cancer-like direction—and, crucially, that removing the exposure can begin to reverse the process remarkably quickly. It’s not definitive proof that changing your body wash will prevent breast cancer. But it does show that the body notices—and starts to repair itself—almost immediately when you stop putting these substances on your skin.

["Reduction of daily-use parabens and phthalates reverses accumulation of cancer-associated phenotypes within disease-free breast tissue of study subjects," Chemosphere, 2023] 

When Land Acknowledgements are honest about the traditional caretakers of the land.

When Land Acknowledgements are honest about the traditional caretakers of the land pic.twitter.com/j4gnaqL819

— The Real Mr Bench (@therealmrbench) November 26, 2025

For more on this deceitful trick to divest you from your property, check out this page. 

RICH HIGGINS: Critical thinking and reason do not exist in the Middle East as we understand them here, and the purpose of the term like Islamophobia is to enforce that Islamic law of slander on westerners to shut down critical thinking and reason that would actually enable us to understand why the enemy fights,

Higgins' book.

The Memo: Twenty Years Inside the Deep State Fighting for America First, Rich Higgins, 2020. 

H. R. McMaster.  On February 20, 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump nominated McMaster for National Security Advisor following the resignation of Michael T. Flynn on February 13.  Trump asked McMaster to remain on active duty while he served as national security advisor.  

Rich Higgins, 1974-2022.  Frank Gaffney provides a eulogy.

Stunning.  Play this interview of Rich Higgins and follow the transcription below, starting at the 8:15 mark titled, "Patriotic." 

 

8:16.  For people that hear the term "narrative," it's not a simple thing to grasp beyond the fact that repetition and purposeful statements, factual or counterfactual, true or not true, have this ability to penetrate into a society and to shape societal thinking.  So what we see is by our enemy in this war a deliberate and purposeful attempt to marry our perception of who they are with left-wing political narratives, terms like "phobia." They know how to use terms that are common to westerners to fulfill their objectives.  So they put together a concept, for example, Islamophobia.  15 years ago we never heard the term Islamophobia, and we have to ask ourselves, where did that come from?  And when you walk it back, you realize that Islamophobia is a term concocted by the generators of these narratives, oftentimes Muslim Brotherhood front organizations, groups like Council of American Islamic Relations, CAIR, or Muslim Public Affairs Council, who generate this term, but from their side it's actually a weaponized version of what is in Islamic law, the law of slander, prohibiting any discussion of Islam that is critical of Islam.  And so by doing this, you've collapsed our ability to do two things that are absolutely pivotal to Western civilization anybody who has spent time in the Middle East will recognize this.  Critical thinking and reason do not exist in the Middle East as we understand them here, and the purpose of the term like Islamophobia is to enforce that Islamic law of slander on westerners to shut down critical thinking and reason that would actually enable us to understand why the enemy fights, why Omar Mateen was drawn to shoot 100 people, 49 who passed at the Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando Florida, in 2016.