With Tom Luongo (@TFL1728) about why Trump humiliated Europe with the trade deal and how it's re-rewriting the new world order with Russia and China in Yelta 2.0 moment  https://t.co/puXX3IVWK0

— Alexej Jordanov (@alexejjordanov) August 3, 2025

China, the United States, and Russia are going to be not friends but not enemies either.  They're going to remake the world.  There's going to be a kind of Yalta 2. The goal is to end the friction and the toll booth system of wealth extraction, for lack of a better term, "sand in the gears," of the global financial system where everything has to go through London and Europe.  Europe has to be brought low.  They have to put all of their unearned wealth on the table to rebuild Europe when the ECB attempts to do this big rug pull of stealing their savings through the SIU or whatever they have planned and starve the European people. I've been calling for the dissolution of the EU for years, but I think I finally see a series of events here.  This is the way the world has to be viewed it has to be viewed in terms of the great game.

AMY NIXON: I keep seeing people say an empty Las Vegas is a harbinger of a US recession. No, an empty Las Vegas is a harbinger of Las Vegas and casinos being a dying Boomer phenomenon. Flashy, loud, tacky, crowded, and inauthentic—younger generations don’t want it

I keep seeing people say an empty Las Vegas is a harbinger of a US recession

No, an empty Las Vegas is a harbinger of Las Vegas and casinos being a dying Boomer phenomenon

Flashy, loud, tacky, crowded, and inauthentic—younger generations don’t want it https://t.co/aWkSKINNWn

— Amy Nixon (@texasrunnerDFW) August 1, 2025

and notice how Trump is not doing anything about this.  I made the point the other day and I will make it again.  Trump controls Israeli politics now.

I'm disappointed in Iran.  They turned out to be bluffing the entire time.  Maybe I'm going to be wrong about that, but as of right now the facts on the ground state pretty clearly that Iran was a paper tiger.  --Tom Luongo

7:40.  And my position is very clear now. Iran never gained a nuclear weapon because they never wanted to gain a nuclear weapon but not for the reasons that Alex and everybody else have been talking about, the fatwa, no, it has nothing to do with that at all.  It's clear that these guys are in bed with freaking GCHQ on both sides. It's the search for the nuclear weapon.  It's the striving for it that is the casus belli, not the actual nuclear weapon.  If they wanted to make a nuclear weapon, they would have done so 20 years ago.  Hell, f*cking North Korean made one.  And if the Russians wanted them to have a nuclear weapon, they would have had one.  If the Chinese wanted them to have a nuclear weapon, they would have had one.  My logic here is not wrong.  My logic here just comes to a different conclusion than your logic, and we're going to find out who's logic is correct, and there's no amount of brow beating me into submission on this.  Because at the end of the day, I understand the strategy of bitches like Christine Lagarde and Andrew Bailey and all the rest of them, and Tony Blair and Benjamin Netanyahu.  The goal is chaos.  Of course, they want regime change in Iran.  Of course, it's playing out like a certain freaking script, and notice how Trump is not doing anything about this.  I made the point the other day and I will make it again.  Trump controls Israeli politics now. The British are trying to resurrect, you know, Reza Pahlavi.  It's not working.  The Russians are going after the NGOs in all of the -stans.  They are arresting people.  Aliyev in Azerbaijan is trying to prop up his failing regime.  He's been caught with his hands in the cookie jar, helping Israel attack Iran from the north, and betray Russia at the same time.  He knows he's in trouble.  

After all of the drama on the slack server for the last couple of days, again I think it's funny that everybody thought I would be upset about this, "Don't tell Tom."  I don't give a s***.  I hope you all found your soulmates being juiceburgs together it's Grand I always want people to find there in the world and if you're not part of mine it's great I don't want you to be in that in this club.  

11:27.  This is my position because I'm trying to end this nightmare.  We have been blackmailed by these evil freaking people for 85 years, 80 years, since the end of World War II, the Cold War, Cold War Redux, the Lost 90s in Russia, all of it.  It's all Downstream of this when you stop to really do the math about how much money is spent trying to deal with minimizing the threat and of nuclear weapon proliferation, and the amount of money that's spent on defense and espionage and cloak-and-dagger stuff, all of it, the Congressional hearings, and the lost wages, all of it, the SG&A costs, [Selling, General, & Administrative Costs] and every corporation in the world.  It's trillions upon trillions upon trillions of dollars every year.  And who does that serve?  Level up and see through the b*******.  The way to end all this is to start cleaving Gordian knots.  Your move, or you get a B2 up your ass.  Your move, or we fly in some F-22s.  Your move.  If you want to know why I have anger in my voice, I'm disappointed in Iran.  They turned out to be bluffing the entire time.  Maybe I'm going to be wrong about that, but as of right now the facts on the ground state pretty clearly that Iran was a paper tiger.  That's what we have and I've been pretty clear, I don't like Israel.  I'm trying not to use the word "hate" because I don't want hate to be the operative means by which I do analysis because that's a bad way to do analysis . . .  because you know that whole anger-fear-aggression path that leads to the dark side, like it's real, folks.  Hate makes you powerful, like yeah.  I'm just not playing that game.  So I want Israel to pay for their crimes, all of them, including the ones where they got us involved and s*** that poured moral stain all over me because I wound up paying for it.  I'm angry about that.  I really wanted to Iran to really knock their freaking teeth in.  Really did. A little angry about that.  A little sad, sad that I was actually sucked into that b******* for a few years.  That being said, they hit them hard enough and hit us hard enough because of the perilous state that our actual military supply lines are in and our ammunition supply lines are in, which has a nugget of truth to it, which is not . . . not untrue that we can't sustain that war for that long.  But we can sustain it longer, long enough to get rid of the assholes who were "fighting the good fight of the resistance." I love Star Wars but it's a bad metaphor for this.  We're not the Empire, they're not the Rebellion or the resistance.  That's not the way this works. Okay so let all that go and let's move forward and say you know what I don't want to be blackmailed by evil f****** shitbags anymore you guys want to fight amongst yourselves for resources you want to text us for military's and all that great great you developed weapons now where you only have to fight each other we're back to where the wars are fought by the King's armies.  And only the king's armies need to be targeted, and the civilians can be left alone.  You know, gentlemanly warfare.  Lob ballistic missiles and drones at each other's ammo dumps and weapons development sites and research departments and Skunk Works and all the rest of it and their barracks.  You sign up for the military, your life is forfeit.  My dad was NYPD.  I never once was under any illusions about the fact that my dad had to put himself In harm's way in order to protect and serve.  And I found it offensive the older I got here in the United States, as time went on, we sat here protecting cops.  F*** protecting cops. Cops are forfeit in service of protecting and serving civilians.  If you've read this month's newsletter I think you understand my perspective on this if you haven't read this month's newsletter maybe consider spending an extra $7 a month on it, or $8 bucks, whatever it is. 

17:50.  I've just come into a different state of mind about all of these things watching this play itself out brought a lot of clarity I'm tired of watching the Vorlons in the Shadows manipulate us into fighting their f****** wars for them.  I want a new way even for people like us.

TOM LUONGO: What do all of these regions have in common? Unbelievable natural resource wealth. Europe has no collateral. I learned that from Alex Krainer.

"That model has made perfect sense to explaining how everybody is acting.

Europe's only path forward is to plunder Canada. THAT'S WHY THEY HATE ALBERTA.

That's why Ottawa hates Alberta. That's why Mark Carney is Prime Minister and that's what has to end."

What an awesome clip… pic.twitter.com/WoynY42QTq

— Bonnie Meikle (@BonnieMeikle1) June 2, 2025

It's very obvious at this point, I think, that Trump is, that Trump, Putin, and to a lesser extent, I believe Xi, but I'm not quite, I'm still a little on the fence about this, they understand who the real enemy is, and the real enemy is Continental Europe, and it's the old banking interests of Old Colonial Europe that need to be destroyed, and that would include the City of London, not Britain, the City of London, the square mile.  That's very important.  That includes the Vatican, I hate to say it.  And the goal is, if you look at everything that's happening, just look at all the little hot spots around the world and the way that things are shaping up, they are trying to bottle up the old Pirates of colonial Europe so that they have no places to plunder.  So they've lost Russia.  They're losing the Middle East. Trump said very nice things about Erdogan about Turkey taking Syria, which blocks Israel from going to war with Iran.  The French have lost the Sahel region of Africa.  That's all gone.  The United States?  Nope, we are changing the way we do business.  We're not going to allow Janet Yellen to spend us into debtors prison, and everything else. The United States is secured.  What do all of these regions have in common?  Unbelievable natural resource wealth. Europe has no collateral.  I learned that from Alex Krainer.  And since then, that model has made perfect sense to explaining how everybody is acting.  Europe's only path forward is to plunder Canada.  That's why they hate Alberta, [known for its oil reserves.] That's why Ottawa hates Alberta.  That's why Mark Carney is prime minister, and that's what has to end. When I read the geopolitical game board, folks, and I'm playing Donald Trump's faction, that's how I'm taking out all of y'all.

This was highly illuminating! https://t.co/xY8lJaPpVL

— Alex (Sasha) Krainer (@NakedHedgie) May 31, 2025

EM Burlingame

PREVIEW

Continental Europeans control the Bank of England.  They have since its creation.

It's always about the theft of the commons, and how do you financialize them use those as collateral.  It's a backdoor way of going around the Brexit Referendum.

It's Continental wealth and power using it ownership of parliamentarians in the Parliament. 

For all intents and purposes the city of London has been the headquarters for the Dutch East Indian company for 360 years.  

What was the Marshall Plan?  Who paid for that?  Oh, and by the way, 7% of that had to be immediately paid to MI6 and the CIA.  That's actually in the Marshall Plan documentation.  Our history about our people and time at all has been spied this occupying force, then retold and retold and retold, so that we don't really know our own history, our own story, our own reality.  

They believe that they have the absolute right to enslave everybody to serve them do you think that we actually defeated the slave mind no we just force them to be more sophisticated more clever.

The English are a bloody brilliant people.  We are a wonderful people we are a civilization.  Let's just remember that.  Let's get back to that.  If we can get back to that, it's a couple simple principles.  You just sum them up very nicely.

TRANSCRIPT

Rich opens with a reference to a podcast EM did with Luongo, Episode #216: EM Burlingame and How to Kill the Financial Kill Chain of Europe, May 1, 2025. 

TOM LUONGO: since Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown, 1781, we have never really had financial independence in the United States, and if you don't have financial independence you don't really have political independence either.

Tom Luongo and Caitlin Long explore the significant financial shifts in the US monetary system, including the transition from LIBOR to SOFR, the role of stablecoins, and the potential decoupling of the US financial system from European control. https://t.co/7aB98UUPrQ

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) May 19, 2025

Find the full transcript here. 

My transcript below starts where Tom says, "Oh, wow."

2:45. Donald Trump is a tempting the first real decoupling of the American financial system, broaden that as wide as you want, from the old Colonial European system if you look over the history of the United States has it pertains to money since our conception, since Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown, 1781, we have never really had financial independence in the United States, and if you don't have financial independence you don't really have political independence either.  How do you feel about the American Revolution?  Since the American Revolution was declared and we are still fighting the vestiges of that system over the course of the past few years, the advent of SOFR, secured overnight financing rate, and the true end of LIBOR [ London Inter-Bank Offered Rate] on March 31st because LIBOR ended on September 30th the 6th month synthetic Library contract that were floating around out there they didn't mature until March 31st.

4:10. LONG.  Can I pause you there and explain the difference between SOFR and LIBOR, and why that means the US is taking power back from London?

4:19.  Sure because the Libor rate is an unsecured rate, decided upon by 18 City of London Banks, only one of which represents American interests in many people's parlance.  And JP Morgan does not represent America's interest at all.  It's only that JP Morgan's London office, their subsidiary, that sat on the board of LIBOR. The secured overnight financing rate . . . LIBOR was a way to price offshore dollars without ever really having to post collateral because you could just pass LIBOR contracts, rehypothecate the maximum themselves, and we had this massive growth the shadow banking system and the euro dollar market over the last 60 or 70 year. . . 

5:03.  Okay let me pause you there.  For people who are just starting to listen to this for the first time and underscore that meant that London Banks set the most important interest rate in US dollar markets . . .

5:15.  . . . and which then would be the most important markets in the world.  So now that we have that established in the LIBOR system was codified in 1984 when LIBOR was unofficially established as the US dollar rate around the world, interestingly enough we had the G5 get together 1985 to create the Plaza Accord so now read currency markets.  That system was really in play all the way up until the global financial crisis of 2008 and that's when the system started to break, really broke, and then, since then years after that around 2011 when the central banks all got together and created swap lines amongst all the major G7 Banks, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of England the Fed, the ECB, they all got together and coordinated monetary policy, and that's actually what broke the last gold bull market.  If you remember it was at that moment in time . That gold peaked and then there was the announcement the coordination of Central Bank policy we were dealing with the potential Greg's it at the time Germany leaving the euro at the time that stabilized markets by the time we got into October November of that year and then that system

Short history of Europe trying to conquer Russia . . . But Russia is somehow the threat to Europe!

Short history of Europe trying to conquer Russia:

🔹~800 years ago: Sweden attacked Russia
🔹~400 years ago, it was Poland-Lithuania
🔹~300 years ago, Sweden again, with UK
🔹~200 years ago, France (Napoleon) tried it
🔹~175 years ago, France + UK (Crimean War)
🔹~100 years ago,… pic.twitter.com/TyHOk6BDH5

— S.L. Kanthan (@Kanthan2030) March 2, 2025

Short history of Europe trying to conquer Russia: ~800 years ago, Sweden attacked Russia ~400 years ago, it was Poland-Lithuania ~300 years ago, Sweden again, with UK ~200 years ago, France (Napoleon) tried it ~175 years ago, France + UK (Crimean War) ~100 years ago, Russian revolution & WW1 ~80 years ago, Hitler backed by globalists Now, NATO waging proxy war thru Ukraine  

But Russia is somehow the threat to Europe! 

TOM LUONGO: They're going to carve the world back up and what Europe is not happy about, because they know what's coming, is that Russia is going to wind up being the guarantor over Europe

So spoke with @TFL1728 on Friday. And let me say, mind-blown (again) and extremely entertaining. Thanks, brother. All who watch, you are getting a treat. My favorite clip and full interview below: https://t.co/jbhpziW946 pic.twitter.com/zUSM8BjUYp

— Andy Millette (@theandymillette) February 22, 2025

It'll start with Eastern Europe but by the time they're done with the sovereign . . . with us engendering a sovereign debt crisis in Europe, stripping them of their gold, stripping the Bank of England of all its leverage, stripping the city of London of its Forex business and its Insurance business, which is what is coming you can see it and you know exactly what I'm getting at.  They are not kidding. 

2:02.  Taking a wrecking ball to Europe and Davos.

2:10.  The wrecking ball that I had in my head after the election, coming into the election, and then after the election, I have a couple of patrons who are close to the transition team, specifically the Office of Management Budget, 1970, with the plan was going to be, my commentary came from that, and that's all turned out to be true. 

4:00.  The era of consensus politics is over, and that now we've moved back into the world of power politics. 

RICHARD POE: It was never FEMA's purpose to provide disaster relief. That was just a cover. FEMA's true purpose is Continuity of Government (COG).

2/2
I exposed FEMA's hidden role in militarizing local police forces, in a 1986 cover story in the EAST VILLAGE EYE.  https://t.co/MqrAVay2jv

— Richard Poe 🇺🇸 (@RealRichardPoe) January 24, 2025

VERNON: Biden pardoning Hunter now & not waiting until January? He knows he might not make it until then.

from Vernon, 

"An interesting weekend..." Add to the developments in Syria, Biden pardoning Hunter now & not waiting until January. He knows he might not make it until then. All eyes on London, they have something planned this month as you & Alex suggested.

Something planned this month?  Is he referring to a possible false-flag terror attack?  

Luongo says that [Biden] made a deal with Trump to not escalate the war and so, stopped the steal.  So if the deal a kind of advanced pardon of Joe to preempt any effort to imprison him or worse, then that kind of handcuffs the boys running Biden's only 4 years as president, boys who really want war in Ukraine to cover up their massive crimes there.

There's a reason why "we can't lose in Ukraine"

And it's because Joe made a deal with Trump to not escalate the war and stopped the steal.

Now, the False Flag of "Biden authorized ATACMS" has us on a very predictable path towards the 25th amendment and a coup by Harris… https://t.co/BlMficawOL

— Tom Luongo (Head Sneetch) (@TFL1728) December 2, 2024

TOM LUONGO: Under Biden, we had a bunch of Ukrainian Nazis. We don't have that [now]. We may have a lot of people who are Israeli first, or owned by AIPAC, or whatever you want to call them, they are not ideologically related to this conflict with blood

11:00.  Under Biden, we had a bunch of Ukrainian Nazis.  We had Anthony Blinkin, Nuland, and all the other people.  We don't have that.  We may have a lot of people who are Israeli first, or owned by AIPAC, or whatever you want to call them, they are not ideologically related to this conflict with blood.  And that's a massive upgrade.  That means that ultimately these people are going to be transactional about this stuff, whereas Nuland and Blinkin and the others were not transactional about it.  This was personal to them.  Yeah, they were put in those positions to execute on that personal animus, and that's reality and as clear as day with Blinkin and it's clear as day with Nuland and Kagan and Bill Crystal, and all the rest of them.  Those people are not in power here.  What we have are a bunch of people who are . . . two things.  I'm trying to take the other side of the Pearl collection on this

from Tom Luongo's Market Report for August 7, 2024.  

Tom's remarks about Mark Walz, Kamala Harris' new VP pick, were extremely interesting. 

33:36. And as Alexander Mercouris pointed out ages ago, he said "But then that effect of this has been to hold everything in this band and hold everything and Innovation behind the curve technology then the lack of competitive then the lack of competitiveness of German industry is exposed badly, especially with the rise of China.  So now Germany is ultimately the target.  Now you can kill the ECB, and you can kill the EU.  If you were a bunch of predatory Fed and New York and Tokyo bankers and you like more open Capital markets than the Europeans do, well then you're going to not argue; you're not going to be down there.  That's why they hate Trump who put Powell in place and they replaced Libor with Sofr.  This is the story I've been telling for 3 years.

from Luongo's Gold, Goats, and Guns:

What is SOFR? The Secured Overnight Funding Rate. It is the U.S. domestic replacement for LIBOR. SOFR is market-driven and arrived at through actual transactions in the U.S. money markets with the daily quote arrived at by real data from real US banks.

LIBOR, on the other hand, is a rate set by 17 foreign banks and 1 U.S. bank (JP Morgan Chase’s London Division). It’s still not market-driven but arrived at by consensus. Regardless of that, it represents the activity within London’s and Europe’s banking system, not the U.S.’s.

Ad therein lies the rub.

For all intents and purposes for decades, LIBOR was the mechanism by which the City of London and Europe controlled the flow of dollars into and out of their banking system. No wonder the Fed had no real control.

Broadly speaking, when the Fed raises rates and it causes a drain on the eurodollar system, it puts upward pressure on LIBOR. If Europe’s banks are more exposed to a rise in the cost of dollars then LIBOR should blow out faster than the Fed raises rates.

In past cycles, before SOFR, all US debt was indexed to LIBOR. So, it didn’t matter if the Fed raised rates domestically, our mortgages, lease rates, and credit lines blew out with LIBOR even if there was no underlying stress in these domestic markets.

With the gold medal win, he is without question, the GOAT of tennis.

With the gold medal win, he is without question, the GOAT of tennis.
🙌 https://t.co/aJUo33fRtm

— Santiago Capital (@SantiagoAuFund) August 5, 2024

Novak Djokovic.  

 

VBL's GHOST: Oil is needed every month every day every minute. You can push gold and silver out on the timeline. Can’t do that with oil.

That’s right. Oil is needed every month every day every minute. You can push gold and silver out on the timeline. Can’t do that with oil.

— VBL’s Ghost (@Sorenthek) July 10, 2024

The Signers of the Declaration of Independence were not wild-eyed, rabble-rousing ruffians. They were soft-spoken men of means and education. They had security, but they valued liberty more.

Thank you to Tom Luongo.

Here’s in video form pic.twitter.com/PfS9E1J40i

— unlikenine (@unlikenine) July 4, 2024

“Have you ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence? Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died.

Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned.

Two lost their sons in the Revolutionary Army, and another had two sons captured.

Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the Revolutionary War.

They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.

What kind of men were they?

Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists.

Eleven were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners, men of means, well educated. But they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well that the penalty would be death if they were captured.

Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his ships swept from the seas by the British Navy. He sold his home and properties to pay his debts and died in rags.

Thomas McKean was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly. He served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions were taken from him, and poverty was his reward.

Vandals or soldiers or both, looted the properties of Ellery, Clymer, Hall, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Ruttledge, and Middleton.

At the battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson Jr., noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the Nelson home for his headquarters. The owner quietly urged General George Washington to open fire. The home was destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt.

Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few months.

John Hart was driven from his wife’s bedside as she was dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and his gristmill were laid to waste. For more than a year he lived in forests and caves, returning home to find his wife dead and his children vanished. A few weeks later, he died from exhaustion and a broken heart. Norris and Livingston suffered similar fates.

Such were the stories and sacrifices of the American Revolution. These were not wild-eyed, rabble-rousing ruffians. They were soft-spoken men of means and education. They had security, but they valued liberty more. Standing tall, straight, and unwavering, they pledged: ‘For the support of this declaration, with firm reliance on the protection of the divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other, our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.’” ~Michael W. Smith

GREG REESE: Chevron deference: It's how OSHA was able to decide that everyone who worked for a large company had to get the jab or be fired. No law gave them that authority. They just made it up.

Greg Reese on the Chevron Deference, 

It's how OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, was able to decide that everyone who worked for a large company had to get the jab or be fired.  No law gave them that authority.  They just made it up.  

It's how the ATF, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, was able to decide a piece of plastic was a machine gun.  

It's how the USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service, the NRCS, is able to decide that a small puddle is a protected wetland.  --Greg Reese

Recent Key Decisions of Supreme Court pic.twitter.com/8VRdMObfL5

— Greg Reese (@gregreese) July 2, 2024

1:40. A family fishing company, Loper Bright Enterprises, was being driven out of business because they couldn't afford the $700 per day they were being charged by the NMFS, the National Marine Fisheries Service to monitor their company.  The thing is federal law doesn't authorize the NMFS to charge businesses for this.  They just decided to start doing it in 2013.  Why did they think they could get away with just charging people without any legal authorization?  Because in 1984 in the Chevron decision, the Supreme Court decided that regulatory agencies were the experts in their field, and the courts should defer to their interpretation of the law.  So for the past 40 years, federal agencies have been able to interpret laws to mean whatever they want, and the courts had to just go with it.  It was called "Chevron deference," and it put bureaucrats in charge of the country.  

It's how OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, was able to decide that everyone who worked for a large company had to get the jab or be fired.  No law gave them that authority.  They just made it up.  

It's how the ATF, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, was able to decide a piece of plastic was a machine gun.  

It's how the USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service, the NRCS, is able to decide that a small puddle is a protected wetland.  

It's how out-of-control agencies have been able to create rules out of thin air and force you to comply, and the courts had to simply defer to them because they were the experts.  

Imagine if your local police could just arrest you for any reason, and no judge or jury was allowed to determine if you'd actually committed a crime or not, just off to jail you go.  That's what "Chevron deference" was.  It was not only blatantly unconstitutional, it caused immeasurable harm to everyone.  Thankfully, it's now gone.  We haven't even begun to feel the effects of this decision in the courts.  It will be used for years to come to roll back federal agencies, and we'll all be better off for it.  And that's why politicians and corporate media are freaking out about it.

Spike Cohen,

In an era of bad news, the US Supreme Court has brought us some good tools that we the people can wield to work on restoring America.  Happy Independence Day.  

Reporting for Infowars this is Greg Reese. 

As a follow-up, please read this by James T. Moodey @ Lew Rockwell.  Looks like there was momentum building for this at least since last year, January 2023.  Check out Judge Napolitano's essay, titled, "A Government by Experts," January 12, 2023.

Tom Luongo has got his claws on this as well at least since March 23, 2024, 

This is yet another example of the desperate need for the Supreme Court to take up the Chevron Deference and strike it down. The agencies should not be making law. That’s Congress’ job.

And I don’t care if Congress is allergic to doing its job, new emission regulations should not be in the hands of unelected bureaucrats run by chiefs who are chosen by the current political party. 

The gist from Luongo: 

Ultimately, Davos cannot deviate from their Gantt chart of their takeover of the West lest they get torn apart like a narc at a biker rally (H/T Dennis Miller). This is why Mark Rutte is being moved from being PM of The Netherlands to NATO Gen. Sec. and why Jens Stoltenberg is moving to the Norwegian Central Bank.

The wildcard here is quickly becoming Nigel Farage in the UK, who could embarrass them again like he did in 2016 with Brexit. Regardless of the outcome of the elections, Farage, Geert Wilders, Marine Le Pen in France and others will all be blamed for a European sov. debt crisis that was baked into the financial cake (and Gantt chart) ages ago.

The big news item for me this week all center on Europe.  U. S. domestic politics at this point are pretty much obvious.  They're trying to do everything imaginable to stop Donald Trump from becoming president and they are failing miserably. I could have just as easily put Nigel Farage up here and talked about next week's election in France and the U.K.  I was all over Twitter yesterday because Nigel Farage came out on national television and basically came out and said, "We provoked Putin into a war, and that's just the reality of it, and if you don't like it, well, you know it's the truth.  

This is giving me Ron Paul/Rudy Guiliani vibes folks.

Please …. Continue…. https://t.co/Mgj2bRj1Jr

— Tom Luongo (Head Sneetch) (@TFL1728) June 22, 2024

And Farage knows what he's doing.  He's time-tested that idea for a long, long time.  I said I wouldn't talk about Farage, but here I am going on about him already.  Farage's Reform Party is making sincere strides in the polls.  I don't know if he's going to have the kind of coattails that will allow him to really upset the apple cart in the U.K., meaning the planned coronation of Keir Starmer with a massive Labor majority which he'll use to destroy what's left of the U.K. and make it subservient to Davos in Europe.  Well, that's the most likely scenario, but if Reform comes in with 150 or 200 seats, that's going to be an earthshattering result even though it will leave Starmer in a huge majority position, Nigel Farage leading the opposition Party in the U.K. government, aside from the fact that it would be hilariously entertaining, would be tremendous.  Now, at the same time, this is a lead into what's happening in NATO.  I was asked directly by people to discuss Mark Ruta

Starts with the headline that the Biden Administration leading a campaign to persuade leaders of G7 nations--UK, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan to sign off on this plan that it views as vital to to giving Ukraine a shot at turning around it's prospects against Russia.  I recently had Jim Rickards on, the author of Currency Wars, and he says that the US is set to steal Russian-owned treasury securities have to G7 which he says this theft will not only destroy the US Treasury market overnight, but potentially do far more damage.  What are your thoughts, Tom, on this US-led campaign, and do you agree with Rickards?

3:02. I frame it a more complicated way than that but I don't disagree with Jim that yes if the US were to take the catastrophic move to seize Russia's Frozen foreign exchange assets that this would be an unprecedented event change the nature of pretty much global finance and it would change the nature of pretty much of global finance.  My problem with that view is that I don't want to let Europe off the hook hear first Ursula von der Leyen and her acceptance speech, for lack of a better term, winning another term as European Commission president, effectively made it abundantly clear yes we're going to take 1.7 billion dollars from Russian foreign exchange assets this month and the next month basically they're going to use they have set up a facility I've always viewed this.  And I don't view the Biden Administration is working for the best interest of the United States I never have I never will I think there are a bunch of vandals and I think they're a bunch of vandals that take their orders from Europe.

Davos have claimed that they will be using Russian assets frozen in the United States to execute the war in Ukraine.  This theft will not only destroy the treasury overnight but potentially do far mor  

TOM LUONGO: Davos, the old colonial powers of Europe, want their colonies back [Louisiana, the United States, etc]

The #WEF, #Davos, #EU are little more than covers for European imperial elites, fighting for supremacy over us all. @TFL1728 explains.  https://t.co/NLn58EmYS1 #Israel #gaza #Palestine #UK #USA pic.twitter.com/GMeJK0hAQt

— Crypto Rich (@CryptoRichYT) June 2, 2024

26:15--28:00  Davos wants control, wants to remove Israel from the scene.  Why?  Because they want to finally put to bed the remnants of the British Empire; that includes the British Empire's proxy, the United States.  

I see Davos, the old colonial powers of Europe, as the primary drivers here because psychologically they map to the most aggressive and the most entitled because they've always controlled natural resources of the 3rd world.  They still see the U.S. as one of the colonies.  The French still want Louisiana back.   They still want Quebec back.  They still make a big deal to get Louisiana back [from] the United States.  They still want to rape the Sahel region of Africa for pennies on the dollar.  Same thing with the Germans.  Same thing with the British.  Same thing with the Portuguese, the Dutch, and the Italians, all of them.  They all want it back the way it was before.  

Luongo cites the vitriol of Ambassador Londo Mollari from Babylon 5 as the best depiction in culture of what the Davos crowd wants, "I want it all back the way that it was."  

"You really want to know what I want? You really want to know the truth, yes? I want my people to reclaim their rightful place in the galaxy. I want to see the Centauri stretch forth their hand again, and command the stars. I want a rebirth of glory, a renaissance of power. I want to stop running through my life like a man late for an appointment...afraid to look back, or to look forward. I want us to be what we used to be! I want...I want it all back the way that it was!"

That's why all of a sudden the world is saying, "Hey man, it's okay to hate Israel.  We're all pro-Palestine."  Everybody's like, "That doesn't make any sense.  [Then] why is Sunak pro-Palestinian?"  Because he works for Davos.  It's not that hard.  

Here is the full interview.  

37:00.  The entire city of London apparatus buying up treasuries like crazy in order to prop up the long end of the US yield curve meaning suppressed rates and hold up prices in the Bank of England has done this and all of the Bank of England's proxies by the way Bermuda the British Virgin Islands the Caymans all the offshore tax savings that are nominally under British crown control they've been buying the crap out of US Treasury so everybody's going to die yeah but the bank of England just bought $600 billion.  They are the 4th highest holder of US debt at this point total within that system, like, up from $350 billion so this is how much of other people's money they have spent to suppress the price to do yield curve control on the US yield curve in order to keep the German yield curve from exploding to the upside and collapsing all of the European Banks.  It's a game of extend and pretend.   That's EU's modus operandi.  Extend and pretend in one Arena in order to create plots and counter plots and subplots in another Arena Financial extended pretend in order to politically advance other agenda and attack another idiot the US legal system, for example, the political system for example why do we go after Donald Trump with non-crimes not because Trump isn't whatever you think of trump is irrelevant what's important is that the Fallout from this case is to destroy the concept that the United States is anything other than a mafia-narco state and that there's no rule of law left. And then if the US were to seize the Russian foreign reserves, your money is not safe there either.  Now who does s*** like this?  Why would the United States do this?  And don't give me the spinal response that's been programmed to trigger into you "Oh that the US is just trying to protect its Empire."  B*******.  That is not what's going on.  This is foreign interference in our f****** system.  So, who are the foreigners?  I happen to choose Europe.  Why? Because they're the ones with the most to f****** lose.  The Chinese aren't doing this because they have so much to lose.  All the Chinese have to do is sit back and buy the yuan and buy gold and make friends across Asia.  Same thing with the Russians.  They don't have to do anything except occasionally lob artillery at the Ukrainians and strategically take out the concentration of NATO guys that wander across the border to run the attacking systems and whatever else we put in place which is all real.  That's all the Russians have to do.  They have to do nothing.  And when the Chinese have no real need to destabilize the US that way, the Chinese would be better served not to do this because you don't want the United States to collapse as a consumer economy, as a productive economy, as an innovation economy.  You don't want that.  It's not a zero-sum game. The real game of geopolitics is a bad model because the game never ends.  It's not a game that ends.  These all people think it ends.  If I go back and watch The Watchmen again when Ozymandias turns to Doctor Manhattan and says in the end, "I did the right thing didn't I, John?"  The world just keeps going on and there's no one singular narrative.  To circle all the way back around to what you said about the people having a hard time understanding what I'm saying is because they need this prima facia evidence of the need for a singular narrative because you cannot deal with the idea that it's just a bunch of people b******* or it's foreign multiple forces competing factions doing their thing.  At the end, there's a bunch of cards on the table and somebody goes "I've got five sites.  I win. Shuffle up the deal, let's do it again."

The plan is civil war.  The plan is secession one way or another.  The whole idea of California and Texas getting together and ousting the . . . I don't buy that, right.  California and New York would go their separate ways if Trump wins.  If Biden wins, Florida, Texas, and the South would go, yeah, we're done.  But that's the big fake out because the real target is the bond war.  The real target is the bond market.  

The way Europe survives, this is all about Europe, it's all about Davos.  Davos still exists.  We could reach peak Davos but they refuse to lose.  They're still trying to make moves.  They're making a lot of moves as a matter of fact.  And they've been making a lot of moves in the last 48 hours that had me ranting into a microphone for 45 minutes before we started here this morning. 

For Europe to survive, you have to break the U.S. financially, legally, politically, culturally, on the border, all of it.  While Europe fiscally integrates, politically integrates and will not tolerate any dissension, they're actively trying to break us apart.  Why?  If you have Janet Yellen and Joe Biden spending more than $2 trillion a year than we are bringing in, then you're just eroding the fiscal position of the United States.  You're undermining the validity of the US Treasury as a reserve asset in the world.  You can't make the Euro a reserve asset but I don't think they actually wanted the Euro to be a reserve asset otherwise it never would have gone into negative interest rates in the first place.  They've always wanted to replace the Euro because it's a faulty structure so they needed to have a new structure, a new Euro with a better structure, one that looks a lot like the United States dollar with one issue, one Central Bank; not 20 central banks issuing euros.