Thursday, November 16, 2023

DAVE SMITH: The Middle East has suffered 1,000s 9/11s at the hands of US foreign policy.

Here is the full debate.  

My first real look at how retarded Laura Loomer is. 

Dave Smith is destroying the inflammatory Laura Loomer with facts.  He cites the 1947 UN charter that allocated 56% of Palestine via the British Mandate to the Zionists, who prior to the charter owned about 10% of the land.  See the 138:45 mark.  Zionists accepted the agreement, and the Arabs said no, which by the way the UN had no authority to just create nations out of thin air.  There I might disagree with Smith, otherwise, what binding value can treaties have?  A civil war broke out immediately, and Israel won.  And 750,000 Arabs were driven out of their land and never allowed to come back to their homes.  So then Israel took over 80% of Palestine.  At first, it was the UN that recommended 56% of Palestine be given to the Zionists, which they had no legitimate right to claim.  And then they took over 80%.  This was in 1948 when they declared their independence.  In 1967, Israel launched a preemptive war as they call it, and they won that again, and then they took control over 100% of it and they've had it ever since.  It has happened throughout history in war.  140:00  But, no, the entire tradition of modern Western civilization, particularly post-WWII, has been to reject the idea that you can annex territory through war.  Again, I'm not saying that we didn't do that with the Native Americans, and there were other examples that happened a lot earlier when that was more permissible.  And since 1967, both Gaza and the West Bank have been completely dominated by Israel.  And if we're going to pretend that that is not even a factor as to why there is this hatred toward Israelies and that it's just "Islamism" and has nothing to do with the policy of the Israeli government, I think we do that at our own peril.

At 141:20, Loomer cites Article 8 of the 1988 Hamas charter.  

Allah is its target.  The prophet is its model.  The Quran its Constitution.  Jihad is its path.  And death for the sake of Allah, the loftiest of its wishes.

The very beginnings of the opening statement of the Hamas charter, which a majority of the Palestinian people support, says, 

Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it. 

It doesn't say until Hamas will obliterate it, it says "until Islam will obliterate it."   just as it obliterated others before

CHRIS MASTERJOHN, PhD: Italian roast, so-called heavy roast, darker than dark, triples the amount of available niacin.

The nice and content in coffee is useless unless the coffee is processed right.

Roasting coffee frees the niacin.

Decaffeinating coffee gets rid of the niacin.

So we want a dark roast.  We want a strong coffee.  And we want that caffeine. 

Compared to light roast, dark roast coffee doubles the niacin content in coffee.

Italian roast, so-called heavy roast, darker than dark, triples the amount of available niacin.  

Decaffeination, by contrast, cuts the amount of niacin by half.

No it also depends on how strong you like your coffee the niacin is not in the water the niacin is in the beans.  When you make coffee about 85% of the niacin in the coffee beans will come into your cup.  But if you make your coffee with 5 G of niacin versus 10 G of niacin you're getting half the

As a rule of thumb you want about 10 G of coffee per cup to consider that a good source of niacin.  I just measured mine and when I make a double shot of expresso, I weighed it out and I get about 12 grams of coffee in that doubt shot.  It all depends on how strong you want it.  If you make weak coffee, it'll be a weak source of niacin.  If he makes strong coffee it'll be a proportionately better source of niacin.

Science says you want your coffee strong and you want your coffee dark.  

Ancestral Supplements, Collagen



Wednesday, November 15, 2023

Neurotoxic Hexane needed to turn rice bran into food item? Thanks, Chipotle, meaning no thanks.

None of us repair too well from these toxins.  And don't expect your doctor to know anything to get you out of this minefield.  

 

Waco, Texas, 1993. The 30th Anniversary

This Is Not An Assault, David Hardy, 2001. 


Waco: The Rules of Engagement, Dan Gifford, 1997.

It is a strange building, and, of course, the government insists that we call it a compound, that we pretend that there was a wall around it, even though there was no wall; that we pretend it was multiple buildings, even though there were no multiple buildings.  It's actually not a compound but they demanded that we call their house a compound to militarize the situation from the very beginning.  What it really was was sort of like a redneck Mansion, right, it was a giant plywood and sheetrock house where about 120 people lived, and it was sort of a commune and it was their Church and dormitory where they lived.  The sect had been in Waco since the 1930s, and they had been at this property at Mount Carmel since the 1950s.  So this group had long predated their leader David Koresh, and essentially it was a break off group from The Seventh-Day Adventists, and the Adventists are Protestant Christians who emphasized the Book of Revelations and the end times and the Seven Seals.  Founded in the mid-19th century, by the time you get to the Branch Davidians, this is a break off group of a break off group, maybe add one more in there and this is something that's very common in American religious history, especially among lower social class Protestant sects that a lot of times they divide off into much smaller and smaller separate groups.  To put all the cards on the table, an important part of the story, at least from the government's view, was that the leader of the Branch Davidian, Vernon Howell, a.k.a., David Koresh was not a very good guy. He clearly was exploiting his position to power over these people.  He wasn't only their minister.  He claimed to be foretold in the Bible as the final Lamb of God who will come and interpret the Seven Seals for the end of the world.  Quite contrary to claims by the FBI and the television media especially, he never claimed to be Jesus.  They were Christians that worshiped Jesus.  He claimed to be this other figure prophesied in some of the Bible passages, who had this special talent to interpret the Seals.  Then he used his followers' belief in that really to exploit them.  He was taking advantage of very young kids, not prepubescent but right at the line, young girls even though it's legal in the state of Texas or at least it was then I'm not sure now, it was legal to marry 14-year-olds with parental consent in Texas at the time.  He was clearly guilty of statutory rape, marrying "and having sex with girls as young as 12 and 13 years old."  He's also taking the lives of of his followers in saying that, "Well, it says here in the Bible that these should live as celibates and the Lamb should be able to create this ruling Council of 24 children to take over the planet after Christ returns, and these are going to be my 24 children," and all this.  By telling the people this and convincing them this, he was taking advantage of his followers wives and young girls.  That much is true.

6:40. And he was guilty of statutory rape, and if he'd been convicted for it he probably would have gone to the penitentiary for it in the state of Texas.  It's not a federal crime, and no part of David Koresh's sins against his own followers or he didn't sin against anyone else, but no part of what he did, I guess his own people that we would consider transgressions whether they thought so or not, none of that has anything to do with federal law whatsoever.  Any mention of that frankly is a red herring by the war party. 

Reward for a job well done ensuring the pointless deaths of a few hundred thousand Slavs by his Neocon... I mean, British masters