THE AMERICAN CULTURIST: Apple Computer team in 1978. Not a single H-1B present.

Apple Computer team in 1978.

Not a single H-1B present. https://t.co/P1bLkWIp7b pic.twitter.com/iwJ2DIsBoO

— 🇺🇸 The American Culturist 🇺🇸 (@MericaCulture) September 2, 2026

DR. TOM COWAN: Tom claims that the descriptor of "Self-Reported Cancer Outcomes" means that nobody was checking or there was no testing done to see whether these were accurate. Everything in this so-called "study" is self-reported.

Ivermectin & Fenbendazole: Revolutionary Cure for Cancer or Scam? - 9/2/26  #drtomcowan #cancer #ivermectin #fenbendazole #health pic.twitter.com/khyeuRw0et

— Dr. Tom Cowan (@drtomcowan) September 2, 2026

Tom's talk on Ivermectin and Fenbendazole starts @ the 12-minute mark.  

At the 17:40 mark, he shows a chart with the results of the study.  Among the 122 cancer patients who completed a 6-month follow-up:

84.4%  Reported clinical benefit.  What benefit?  They don't identify it.  Why not? 

48.4%  Reported the strongest positive outcomes--either tumor shrinkage or no current evidence of disease.  Okay, so this is something.  Tumor shrinkage is good, as is " no current evidence of disease."

36.1%  Reported their disease stayed about the same.

15.6%  Reported disease progression.  Okay, not good, not good at all. 

The study began with 197 cancer patients and 122 completed follow-up.  Patients were prescribed capsules containing 25 mg of Ivermectin and 250 mg of Menbendazole.  They took up to 4 capsules per day, according to Physicians recommendation.

75 patients, or 40% of patients on we have no information about what happened to them maybe they all died or maybe they had horrible side effects and stopped taking it or maybe nothing happened to them and they ran out of money or maybe they were all cured of cancer and so they didn't want to do the follow-up questionnaire.  Many more possibilities could be true, but we have no way of knowing that.  Patients were prescribed this dose, 4 capsules a day.  

Tom claims that the descriptor of "Self-Reported Cancer Outcomes" means that nobody was checking or there was no testing done to see whether these were accurate.  Everything in this so-called "study" is self-reported.  In other words the people self-reported without any seemingly attempt to check whether it was accurate or not; that they, in fact, did have this disease that they said they did and then they self-reported without any lab tests, without any x-rays, without any studies, without any examinations, just self-reported how they had done.  [Okay, so how would they know that their tumors shrank or that the progression of their disease stabilized?].

Of the 84.4% who benefited, 32.8% had no current evidence of disease; 15.6% had regression of the disease; and in 36.1% of patients, their disease stabilized.  

21:32. Presents the authors of the study.  

For a medication that's a 1% the cost of chemotherapy, it showed a remarkable efficacy rate:

84.4% reported clinical benefit defined as improved or stabilization of disease. 

Nearly 1 in 2 reported the strongest positive outcomes: tumor shrinkage or no evidence of disease.

15.6% reported progression of disease.

23:02.  Baseline cancer, this is the type of cancer, and again when they say this was actively spreading or stable this is simply the patient self-reporting, no tests done, no doctor checking, no lab tests, no x-rays, no radiographic studies, this was just patient self-reporting, where their status was.

He's referencing this study here: 

Study showing ivermectin's 12 anti-cancer mechanisms: https://t.co/M418zlpcPF

Study finds ivermectin has 84.4% clinical benefit in human cancer patients: https://t.co/dAm4WZiKUI

Study reports COMPLETE REMISSION of Stage IV cancers with fenbendazole: https://t.co/o6LqxGswnH… pic.twitter.com/QYOrecL0tg

— Nicolas Hulscher, MPH (@NicHulscher) September 2, 2026

This right here👇 https://t.co/25ULsAoyEF

— Linuxhippie (@linuxhippie) September 2, 2026

The Clancy case has provided yet another opportunity for us to witness the moral derangement of Western civilization. People who think this case is just another distraction; it matters. It matters because it fits right within the framework of dialectical political warfare & the objective of aufheben dur kultur: destroy the culture by eroding the populace’s ability to recognize moral wrongs from moral truths. Deracinate individuals from the grounding of reality. Inversion is the name of the game. Evil is actually victimhood, actual victims are somehow instead the oppressors, the burdens, the cause of the harm, the obstacles to be overcome by ruthless actions that can always be justified by virtue of the inverted “victim’s” struggles.

A few moral truths.

The woman who have been mystified into rallying behind Clancy have been enchanted by an ideology that portrays struggle as the process through which to achieve liberation & transformation. Feminism demands the destruction of repressive social structures that oppress women & prevent them from achieving their “true” potential. Men, The Patriarchy™️, motherhood, the needs of children, the biological reality of being a female mammal, the natural differences between men & women, the traditions & norms, or hegemony of Western society. All oppressive & harmful obstacles that necessitate ruthless & perpetual criticism & destruction. Feminism, Critical Theories, etc. are conflict theories. They require dialectical poles coming into conflict, & the energy generated from this conflict drives transformation. The struggle is the process for emancipation. Young women today are embracing victimhood because it gives them a pathway into this emancipatory, transformational process. The young moms posting TikToks about “Same, Lindsay” or “postpartum anxiety be like” are participating in this process by identifying into <The Struggle>. It’s like the autism, ADHD, Tourette’s, “neurodivergent,” etc. Tiktoks/Instagram social media trends that pop up like periodic ephemeral mass mania; everyone gets to self-identify into The Struggle & who are you to question their legitimacy? Their Lived Experience gives them their legitimacy. And this identification gives them a pathway into & a process to follow. It gives them social capital. It gives them an identity, a group, & a cause. And, very importantly, an enemy. Someone & something to be blamed for their discontent & dissatisfaction. What happens today is that an event occurs, the event is seized on by people who embrace a particular (critical) framework, social media amplifies these interpretations, people’s perceptions are influenced, & very importantly — BEFORE they are influenced by these interpretations, their minds have already been conditioned & shaped by this same particular framework for interpreting & understanding the world at large—so the interpretation of the current event can slot right into this framework. The moral inversion process has already begun long ago. Specific narratives “make sense” - women are burdened, men are privileged, motherhood may not be worth the costs, no matter what, women will always be at a disadvantage. It doesn’t matter how much men or fathers do, women are always struggling *more*. These ideas are already dominant in the cultural context.

It doesn’t take a grand conspiracy by some group of actors to use current events to derange & manipulate people. The ideological framework is already in place. We do it to ourselves, & social media has become a major tool in the process. We really are in crisis. The West is in a crisis of morality. 

NAS: As NAS research has documented, Qatar’s $7.7B in higher ed funding isn't philanthropY . . . it purchases campus silence.

As NAS research has documented, Qatar’s $7.7B in higher ed funding isn't philanthropy...it purchases campus silence.  https://t.co/YrqD4OeOQr

— National Association of Scholars (@NASorg) September 2, 2026

Jail Sentence Suspended, yes, but Karyann Parkinson's conviction remains. And now she's on the state's child abuse and neglect registry.

Her son is already under supervision whereever he goes, under the intellectual instructions taught and observed by him of adults, his mom and dad, siblings, and friends and classmates.  There's a fucking community of supervision yet CPS is jealous because they weren't invited.  Either that or the security company overpaid for the 24-hour video surveillance.  Is the HOA community really concerned about child safety and welfare?  Really?  Remember, it's leafy Williamsburg, Virginia.

While the judge immediately suspended the sentence, pending good behavior and compliance with CPS' conditions, the conviction remains.

Virginia Mom Gets 6-Month Suspended Jail Sentence for Letting 5-Year-Old Walk to the Pond https://t.co/2L67I3FlZd via @reason

— Mike Walgenbach (@Walgenbach82743) September 3, 2026

Freedom and trust in your neighbors is prohibited in the U.S.?  

Reason covers the story.

The cops, meanwhile, charged her with contributing to the delinquency of a minor. CPS found the allegations substantiated and placed Parkinson on the state's child abuse and neglect registry. She will remain there for seven years. 

The ordeal reached its nadir last week when a judge convicted Parkinson of the delinquency of a minor charge, a first-degree misdemeanor. This comes with a six-month jail sentence. 

While the judge immediately suspended the sentence, pending good behavior and compliance with CPS' conditions, the conviction remains. Parkinson assumes this means she will not be able to volunteer in her kids' schools. She fears it could also mean she will not get her law license. 

Parkinson is not new to parenting.  She's got 5 kids plus a degree in parenting.  

Parkinson is no newbie to parenting. She graduated Brigham Young University in 2012 with a degree in family science. She then became a family life educator and spent three years as a live-in behavioral specialist at a residential treatment center. There, she and her husband, a marriage and family therapist, oversaw the care of 35 girls. 

Plus this,

In Virginia, Parkinson spent one summer interning at the Institute for Justice and another working in the law office of former Virginia state Sen. Jill Vogel (R–Winchester). Vogel was actually co-sponsor of the reasonable childhood independence law that passed in Virginia, unanimously, in 2023. 

All this to say that she's got character references that should have been taken into consideration before convicting her "with contributing to the delinquency of a minor."  

And now she's on the state's child abuse and neglect registry.